Sequential treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients after first-line vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy in a real-world setting: epidemiologic, noninterventional, retrospective-prospective cohort multicentre study

Cabozantinib and Axitinib After Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study from England

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors cabozantinib and axitinib have been widely used in England to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma following prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy, but data on real-world usage remain limited. Our objective was to describe the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received second-line or later-line (≥ 2L) cabozantinib or axitinib after vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in clinical practice in England.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used clinical practice data (collected 2011-20) from the English Cancer Analysis System database. Patient characteristics, treatment sequence and duration, and overall survival (time from initiation of cabozantinib/axitinib treatment to death) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Data from 1485 eligible adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma were analyzed: 440 received ≥  2L cabozantinib (2L for 88.6% of them); 1045 received ≥  2L axitinib (2L for 89.5%). The most common first-line treatments were sunitinib (2L cabozantinib subcohort, 48%; 2L axitinib subcohort, 46%) and pazopanib (46% and 54%, respectively); nivolumab was the most common third-line treatment (18% and 19%, respectively). Median (interquartile range) 2L therapy duration was 5.52 (2.73-11.74) months for cabozantinib and 4.60 (1.45-12.36) months for axitinib. Following adjustment for potential confounders using inverse probability weighting, overall survival (median [interquartile range]) was longer for ≥ 2L cabozantinib (11.2 [5.7-28.0] months) than for ≥  2L axitinib (10.4 [4.7-22.0] months; log-rank p = 0.0034).

CONCLUSIONS

The Cancer Analysis System database is a valuable research resource providing extensive real-world clinical data. Real-world overall survival was longer with ≥  2L cabozantinib than with axitinib.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04637204; registered November 2020.

RENO Study: Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and survival results in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Northern Spain

BACKGROUND

The current available evidence on the management of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) in real life is scarce in our environment. We present a summary of the existing real-world data and the results of an analysis describing the clinical characteristics, treatments, and health outcomes of patients with mRCC in northern Spain.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study. Adult patients diagnosed with mRCC between Jan 2007 and Dec 2019 were included. Epidemiological, efficacy and toxicity data were collected. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 829 patients were included (median age at diagnosis:63 years;73% men). Median follow-up was 180 months. The preponderant histology was clear cell (85%). In 50% the initial diagnosis was advanced disease. The distribution according to IMDC prognosis was good (24%), intermediate (50%) and poor (26%). The most frequent metastatic locations were lung (68.3%) and lymph node (41.0%). Most patients (95%) received a first line (1L) systemic treatment, 60% were treated with a second line (2L) of therapy and 37% received third line (3L). A VEGFR-TKIs was the most common treatment (1L: 90%, n = 507; 2L: 49%, n = 233; 3L: 54%, n = 156) followed by mTOR inhibitors (1L: 2%, n = 4; 2L: 27%, n = 126; 3L: 23%, n = 68) and immunotherapy (1L: 3.7%, n = 25; 2L: 27%, n = 126). Median OS was 24.5 months in the general population. According to IMDC prognostic groups, OS was 52.5, 25.7 and 9 months respectively. From the start of the 1L, 2L, and 3L treatment, median PFS was: 1L: 7.8 (6.8-9.0); 2L: 4.9 (4.3-5.5); 3L: 4.3 (3.8-4.8) months. No unexpected toxicity was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The Real-World Data on the management of mRCC in Northern Spain are comparable in epidemiology, efficacy, and safety to studies conducted in other areas of the world. The significant reduction in the number of patients receiving second and subsequent lines of therapy hampers the access to new therapies developed in this context.

Impact of primary resistance to front-line targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on subsequent immune-checkpoint-inhibition

INTRODUCTION

Synergistic effects have been discussed for tyrosine kinase (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Primary resistance to TKI might disturb subsequent ICI effectiveness. The objective was to investigate, if primary resistance to 1st line TKI monotherapy predicts response to ICI in subsequent therapy lines and impacts overall survival (OS) in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, aRCC patients which received front-line TKI from 2016 to 2019 were analyzed for the outcomes primary resistance (1LR), response to sequential ICI therapy, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier-estimates, Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression were used.

RESULTS

Primary resistance to front-line TKI was observed in 27 (53%) of 51 patients. Groups with disease control (DC) and 1st line TKI resistance (1LR) were not different at baseline with regard to clinicopathological features. Median duration on 1st line therapy was significantly shorter in the 1LR (5.1 months) than in the DC (14.7 months) group (p = 0.01). Sequential therapy was started in 21 (75%) and 12 (52%) patients of 1LR and DC groups using nivolumab in 16 (76%) vs. 11 (92%) cases (p > 0.05). Logistic regression revealed that 1LR status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio < 3, IMDC favorable prognosis and clear cell histology had no significant impact on responsiveness to ICI in subsequent therapy lines. Cox proportional hazards demonstrated no significant association of 1LR status with PFS and OS in patients who received subsequent ICI treatment.

CONCLUSION

Primary TKI resistance of aRCC was neither significantly associated with responsiveness to ICI during sequential therapy nor with PFS and OS. This adds the evidence for ICI based sequential therapy in primary TKI resistant aRCC.