Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

The Diagnostic Impact of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) in Evaluating Lymph Node Involvement in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health burden, necessitating accurate staging and treatment planning for optimal patient outcomes. Lymph node involvement is a critical determinant of prognosis in CRC, emphasizing the importance of reliable imaging techniques for its evaluation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) has emerged as a cornerstone in CRC imaging, offering high-resolution anatomical detail and vascular assessment. This comprehensive review synthesizes the existing literature to evaluate the diagnostic impact of CECT in assessing lymph node involvement in CRC. Key findings highlight CECT's high sensitivity and specificity in detecting lymph node metastases, facilitating accurate staging and treatment selection. However, challenges such as limited resolution for small lymph nodes and potential false-positives call for a cautious interpretation. Recommendations for clinical practice suggest the integration of CECT into multidisciplinary treatment algorithms, optimizing imaging protocols and enhancing collaboration between radiologists and clinicians. Future research directions include refining imaging protocols, comparative effectiveness studies with emerging modalities, and prospective validation of CECT's prognostic value. Overall, this review stresses the pivotal role of CECT in CRC management and identifies avenues for further advancements in imaging-guided oncology care.

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing bone invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in detecting bone invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients and to explore clinicopathological factors associated with its reliability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

417 patients underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT followed by radical surgery. The presence or absence of bone invasion served as the outcome variable, with histopathologic examination of the resection specimen considered the gold standard. Statistical analyses, comprising correlation analyses and the determination of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were conducted.

RESULTS

CT exhibited 76.85% sensitivity, 82.20% specificity, 47.14% PPV, and 89.67% NPV. False-positive and false-negative rates were 11.27% and 5.99%, respectively. Artifacts affected assessment in 44 patients, but not in those with bone invasion. Tumor size, depth of invasion (DOI), tumor localization at the upper jaw, lymphatic invasion, and perineural invasion correlated with incorrect identification of bone invasion (Chi-square, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite utilizing thin-section CT, notable false-positive and false-negative results persisted. Patients with T3 tumors, DOI ≥ 10 mm, or upper jaw tumors are at higher risk for misidentification of bone invasion. Combining multiple methods may enhance diagnostic accuracy, and the integration of artificial intelligence or tracking electrolyte disturbances by tumor depth profiling shows promise for further assessment of bone invasion before histopathology.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons should consider these insights when planning tumor resection. Supplementary imaging may be warranted in cases with high risk factors for misidentification. Further methodological advancements are crucial for enhancing diagnostic precision.

Prevalence and implications of bilateral and solely contralateral lymph node metastases in oral squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Effective management of neck in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is pivotal for oncological outcomes. Although consensus exists for ipsilateral neck dissection (ND), the necessity for contralateral ND remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and implications of bilateral/solely contralateral (B/SC) lymph node metastases (LNMs) to determine the need for contralateral elective ND. Additionally, it examined the prevalence and implications of occult B/SC metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, 420 OSCC patients underwent primary surgical treatment following German guidelines at a tertiary center. Preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography was conducted, and ND adhered to a standardized approach.

RESULTS

Solely contralateral metastases occurred in 0.95% of patients, with bilateral metastases observed in 7.13%. Occult B/SC metastases occurred in 3.81% of the cases. Correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant association between B/SC metastases and higher tumor stages, tumor localization at the upper jaw or floor of the mouth, proximity to the midline, ipsilateral LNMs, and lymphatic invasion (all p < 0.05). Patients with B/SC metastases showed poorer disease-free survival, with statistical significance reached in the bilateral LNMs group (p = 0.010). Similarly, a significant difference was noted in overall survival between patients with bilateral and solely ipsilateral metastases (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

B/SC LNMs are rare in patients with OSCC, especially in those who present with clinico-radiologically negative ipsilateral necks. Higher rates of B/SC metastases occur in case of advanced tumors and those localized at the upper jaw or floor of the mouth. Ipsilateral LNMs significantly elevate the risk of contralateral LNMs, tripling the associated risk.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings provide valuable insights for surgeons considering contralateral ND or extended adjuvant treatment for OSCC patients. However, the absence of high-level evidence from randomized controlled trials impedes the establishment of a definitive standard of care.

Occult metastasis is no burden factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients when adhering to a standardized approach in neck dissection

OBJECTIVES

Management of the neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is pivotal to oncologic control and survival. However, there is controversy regarding necessity of neck dissection (ND) in patients with clinically node-negative neck. We aimed to assess risk factors for occult metastasis and to explore whether the presence of occult lymph node metastases (LNMs) has an impact on recurrence and survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with primary OSCC who underwent radical tumor resection and ND in a high-volume center adhering to the prevailing German guideline. The ND was performed according to a standardized approach.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-one patients with primary surgically treated OSCC were included. The incidence of occult metastasis was 14.49%. A pathological T stage > 1 (multivariate analysis, odds ratio (OR) 3.958, p = 0.042) and the presence of extranodal extension in LNMs (multivariate analysis, OR 0.287, p = 0.020) were identified as independent risk factors for occult metastasis. When comparing patients with and without occult metastasis, there were no significant differences in terms of progression-free survival (log-rank, p = 0.297) and overall survival (log-rank, p = 0.320). There were no cases of ipsilateral neck recurrence. One patient developed contralateral neck metastasis; however, he initially presented with a unilateral pT1 pN0 tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our findings suggest that conducting a standardized approach in ND should be applied in terms of management of the neck in order to maintain survival rates and to prevent neck recurrence in OSCC patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

None of the risk factors for occult metastasis can be reliably assessed preoperatively. Although elective ND does not guarantee the complete prevention of neck recurrence, it increases the likelihood of either timely removal of micrometastases or strengthens the justification for adjuvant therapy. Consequently, this approach leads to improvements in clinical outcomes.