1
|
Koungoulos LG, Hulme-Beaman A, Fillios M. Phenotypic diversity in early Australian dingoes revealed by traditional and 3D geometric morphometric analysis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:21228. [PMID: 39294146 PMCID: PMC11411105 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65729-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024] Open
Abstract
The dingo is a wild dog endemic to Australia with enigmatic origins. Dingoes are one of two remaining unadmixed populations of an early East Asian dog lineage, the other being wild dogs from the New Guinea highlands, but morphological connections between these canid groups have long proved elusive. Here, we investigate this issue through a morphometric study of ancient dingo remains found at Lake Mungo and Lake Milkengay, in western New South Wales. Direct accelerated mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dates from an ancient Lake Mungo dingo demonstrate that dingoes with a considerably smaller build than the predominant modern morphotype were present in semi-arid southeastern Australia c.3000-3300 calBP. 3D geometric morphometric analysis of a near-complete Mungo cranium finds closest links to East Asian and New Guinean dogs, providing the first morphological evidence of links between early dingoes and their northern relatives. This ancient type is no longer extant within the range of modern dingo variability, but populations from nearby southeastern Australia show a closer resemblance than those to the north and west. Our results reaffirm prior characterisations of regional variability in dingo phenotype as not exclusively derived from recent domestic dog hybridisation but as having an earlier precedent, and suggest further that the dingo's phenotype has changed over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loukas G Koungoulos
- Department of Archaeology, School of Humanities, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, School of Culture, History and Language, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
- Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Ardern Hulme-Beaman
- Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, School of Histories, Languages and Cultures, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Melanie Fillios
- Department of Archaeology, School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, The University of New England, Armidale, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Souilmi Y, Wasef S, Williams MP, Conroy G, Bar I, Bover P, Dann J, Heiniger H, Llamas B, Ogbourne S, Archer M, Ballard JWO, Reed E, Tobler R, Koungoulos L, Walshe K, Wright JL, Balme J, O’Connor S, Cooper A, Mitchell KJ. Ancient genomes reveal over two thousand years of dingo population structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2407584121. [PMID: 38976766 PMCID: PMC11287250 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2407584121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Dingoes are culturally and ecologically important free-living canids whose ancestors arrived in Australia over 3,000 B.P., likely transported by seafaring people. However, the early history of dingoes in Australia-including the number of founding populations and their routes of introduction-remains uncertain. This uncertainty arises partly from the complex and poorly understood relationship between modern dingoes and New Guinea singing dogs, and suspicions that post-Colonial hybridization has introduced recent domestic dog ancestry into the genomes of many wild dingo populations. In this study, we analyzed genome-wide data from nine ancient dingo specimens ranging in age from 400 to 2,746 y old, predating the introduction of domestic dogs to Australia by European colonists. We uncovered evidence that the continent-wide population structure observed in modern dingo populations had already emerged several thousand years ago. We also detected excess allele sharing between New Guinea singing dogs and ancient dingoes from coastal New South Wales (NSW) compared to ancient dingoes from southern Australia, irrespective of any post-Colonial hybrid ancestry in the genomes of modern individuals. Our results are consistent with several demographic scenarios, including a scenario where the ancestry of dingoes from the east coast of Australia results from at least two waves of migration from source populations with varying affinities to New Guinea singing dogs. We also contribute to the growing body of evidence that modern dingoes derive little genomic ancestry from post-Colonial hybridization with other domestic dog lineages, instead descending primarily from ancient canids introduced to Sahul thousands of years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassine Souilmi
- Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
- The Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
| | - Sally Wasef
- Ancient DNA Facility, Defence Genomics, Genomics Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD4059, Australia
- Innovation Division, Forensic Science Queensland, Queensland Health, Coopers Plains, QLD4108, Australia
| | - Matthew P. Williams
- Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
- Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA16802
| | - Gabriel Conroy
- School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD4556, Australia
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD4556, Australia
| | - Ido Bar
- Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD4111, Australia
| | - Pere Bover
- Fundación Agencia Aragonesa para la Investigacióny el Desarrollo (ARAID), Zaragoza50018, Spain
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ciencias Ambientales de Aragón (IUCA)-Grupo Aragosaurus, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza50009, Spain
| | - Jackson Dann
- Grützner Laboratory of Comparative Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
| | - Holly Heiniger
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), AdelaideSA5005, Australia
| | - Bastien Llamas
- Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), AdelaideSA5005, Australia
- National Centre for Indigenous Genomics, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, ActonACT2601, Australia
- Indigenous Genomics, Telethon Kids Institute, Adelaide, SA5000, Australia
| | - Steven Ogbourne
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD4556, Australia
| | - Michael Archer
- Earth and Sustainability Science Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney, SydneyNSW2052, Australia
| | - J. William O. Ballard
- School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC3052, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Reed
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, AdelaideSA5005, Australia
| | - Raymond Tobler
- Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
- Evolution of Cultural Diversity Initiative, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT2601, Australia
| | - Loukas Koungoulos
- Archaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Acton, ACT2601, Australia
- Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW2010, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT2601, Australia
| | - Keryn Walshe
- School of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Auckland, Auckland1010, New Zealand
| | - Joanne L. Wright
- Queensland Department of Education, Kelvin Grove State College, Kelvin Grove, QLD4059, Australia
| | - Jane Balme
- School of Social Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA6009, Australia
| | - Sue O’Connor
- Archaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Acton, ACT2601, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT2601, Australia
| | - Alan Cooper
- Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW2640, Australia
| | - Kieren J. Mitchell
- Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), AdelaideSA5005, Australia
- Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research, Lincoln, Canterbury7608, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar M, Conroy G, Ogbourne S, Cairns K, Borburgh L, Subramanian S. Genomic signatures of bottleneck and founder effects in dingoes. Ecol Evol 2023; 13:e10525. [PMID: 37732287 PMCID: PMC10508967 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Dingoes arrived in Australia during the mid-Holocene and are the top-order terrestrial predator on the continent. Although dingoes subsequently spread across the continent, the initial founding population(s) could have been small. We investigated this hypothesis by sequencing the whole genomes of three dingoes and also obtaining the genome data from nine additional dingoes and 56 canines, including wolves, village dogs and breed dogs, and examined the signatures of bottlenecks and founder effects. We found that the nucleotide diversity of dingoes was low, 36% less than highly inbred breed dogs and 3.3 times lower than wolves. The number of runs of homozygosity (RoH) segments in dingoes was 1.6-4.7 times higher than in other canines. While examining deleterious mutational load, we observed that dingoes carried elevated ratios of nonsynonymous-to-synonymous diversities, significantly higher numbers of homozygous deleterious Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs), and increased numbers of loss of function SNVs, compared to breed dogs, village dogs, and wolves. Our findings can be explained by bottlenecks and founder effects during the establishment of dingoes in mainland Australia. These findings highlight the need for conservation-based management of dingoes and the need for wildlife managers to be cognisant of these findings when considering the use of lethal control measures across the landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoharan Kumar
- School of Science, Technology, and EngineeringThe University of the Sunshine CoastMoreton BayQueenslandAustralia
| | - Gabriel Conroy
- Centre for BioinnovationThe University of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
- School of Science, Technology, and EngineeringThe University of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
| | - Steven Ogbourne
- Centre for BioinnovationThe University of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
| | - Kylie Cairns
- Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUNSW AustraliaSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUNSW AustraliaSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Liesbeth Borburgh
- School of Science, Technology, and EngineeringThe University of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
| | - Sankar Subramanian
- School of Science, Technology, and EngineeringThe University of the Sunshine CoastMoreton BayQueenslandAustralia
- Centre for BioinnovationThe University of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ballard JWO, Field MA, Edwards RJ, Wilson LAB, Koungoulos LG, Rosen BD, Chernoff B, Dudchenko O, Omer A, Keilwagen J, Skvortsova K, Bogdanovic O, Chan E, Zammit R, Hayes V, Aiden EL. The Australasian dingo archetype: de novo chromosome-length genome assembly, DNA methylome, and cranial morphology. Gigascience 2023; 12:giad018. [PMID: 36994871 PMCID: PMC10353722 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giad018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One difficulty in testing the hypothesis that the Australasian dingo is a functional intermediate between wild wolves and domesticated breed dogs is that there is no reference specimen. Here we link a high-quality de novo long-read chromosomal assembly with epigenetic footprints and morphology to describe the Alpine dingo female named Cooinda. It was critical to establish an Alpine dingo reference because this ecotype occurs throughout coastal eastern Australia where the first drawings and descriptions were completed. FINDINGS We generated a high-quality chromosome-level reference genome assembly (Canfam_ADS) using a combination of Pacific Bioscience, Oxford Nanopore, 10X Genomics, Bionano, and Hi-C technologies. Compared to the previously published Desert dingo assembly, there are large structural rearrangements on chromosomes 11, 16, 25, and 26. Phylogenetic analyses of chromosomal data from Cooinda the Alpine dingo and 9 previously published de novo canine assemblies show dingoes are monophyletic and basal to domestic dogs. Network analyses show that the mitochondrial DNA genome clusters within the southeastern lineage, as expected for an Alpine dingo. Comparison of regulatory regions identified 2 differentially methylated regions within glucagon receptor GCGR and histone deacetylase HDAC4 genes that are unmethylated in the Alpine dingo genome but hypermethylated in the Desert dingo. Morphologic data, comprising geometric morphometric assessment of cranial morphology, place dingo Cooinda within population-level variation for Alpine dingoes. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain tissue shows she had a larger cranial capacity than a similar-sized domestic dog. CONCLUSIONS These combined data support the hypothesis that the dingo Cooinda fits the spectrum of genetic and morphologic characteristics typical of the Alpine ecotype. We propose that she be considered the archetype specimen for future research investigating the evolutionary history, morphology, physiology, and ecology of dingoes. The female has been taxidermically prepared and is now at the Australian Museum, Sydney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J William O Ballard
- School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
- Department of Environment and Genetics, SABE, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia
| | - Matt A Field
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Science, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia
- Immunogenomics Lab, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Richard J Edwards
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Laura A B Wilson
- School of Archaeology and Anthropology, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2600, Australia
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Loukas G Koungoulos
- Department of Archaeology, School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Benjamin D Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Barry Chernoff
- College of the Environment, Departments of Biology, and Earth & Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA
| | - Olga Dudchenko
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Center for Theoretical and Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Arina Omer
- Center for Theoretical and Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Jens Keilwagen
- Institute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Julius Kühn-Institut, Quedlinburg 06484, Germany
| | - Ksenia Skvortsova
- Developmental Epigenomics Lab, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Ozren Bogdanovic
- Developmental Epigenomics Lab, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Eva Chan
- Developmental Epigenomics Lab, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- Statewide Genomics, New South Wales Health Pathology, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
| | - Robert Zammit
- Vineyard Veterinary Hospital,Vineyard, NSW 2765, Australia
| | - Vanessa Hayes
- Developmental Epigenomics Lab, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Erez Lieberman Aiden
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Center for Theoretical and Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
- UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Examination of Shape Variation of the Skull in British Shorthair, Scottish Fold, and Van Cats. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:ani13040614. [PMID: 36830403 PMCID: PMC9951682 DOI: 10.3390/ani13040614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
A variety of skull shapes are frequently used for discrimination between animal species, breeds, and sexes. In this study, skulls of three different breeds of cats were examined by the geometric morphometric method, with the aim of revealing skull shape differences. For this purpose, 27 cats (6 British Shorthair, 7 Scottish Fold, and 14 Van cats) were used. The skulls of cats were modeled by computed tomography. Geometric morphometrics was applied using dorsal (8 landmarks, 63 semilandmarks) and lateral (8 landmarks, 63 semilandmarks) skull projections on these models. Centroid size differences between the breeds were statistically insignificant. However, the differences in shape were statistically significant for both the dorsal view and lateral view. Shape variation was less in the British Shorthair than in other breeds. Shape differences generally occurred around the orbit. In the skull of Scottish Folds, the orbit was situated more caudally than in other breeds. The British Shorthair had the largest orbital ring. In dorsal view, the Scottish Fold had the largest orbital diameter. The orbital ring of Van cats was smallest in both dorsal and lateral views. In the canonical variate analysis, it was seen that the breeds were separated from each other. The shape difference in the skull between different cat breeds could be revealed by geometric morphometrics. The results of this study provide useful information for taxonomy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ballard JWO, Field MA, Edwards RJ, Wilson LAB, Koungoulos LG, Rosen BD, Chernoff B, Dudchenko O, Omer A, Keilwagen J, Skvortsova K, Bogdanovic O, Chan E, Zammit R, Hayes V, Aiden EL. The Australasian dingo archetype: De novo chromosome-length genome assembly, DNA methylome, and cranial morphology. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.01.26.525801. [PMID: 36747621 PMCID: PMC9900879 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.26.525801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Background One difficulty in testing the hypothesis that the Australasian dingo is a functional intermediate between wild wolves and domesticated breed dogs is that there is no reference specimen. Here we link a high-quality de novo long read chromosomal assembly with epigenetic footprints and morphology to describe the Alpine dingo female named Cooinda. It was critical to establish an Alpine dingo reference because this ecotype occurs throughout coastal eastern Australia where the first drawings and descriptions were completed. Findings We generated a high-quality chromosome-level reference genome assembly (Canfam_ADS) using a combination of Pacific Bioscience, Oxford Nanopore, 10X Genomics, Bionano, and Hi-C technologies. Compared to the previously published Desert dingo assembly, there are large structural rearrangements on Chromosomes 11, 16, 25 and 26. Phylogenetic analyses of chromosomal data from Cooinda the Alpine dingo and nine previously published de novo canine assemblies show dingoes are monophyletic and basal to domestic dogs. Network analyses show that the mtDNA genome clusters within the southeastern lineage, as expected for an Alpine dingo. Comparison of regulatory regions identified two differentially methylated regions within glucagon receptor GCGR and histone deacetylase HDAC4 genes that are unmethylated in the Alpine dingo genome but hypermethylated in the Desert dingo. Morphological data, comprising geometric morphometric assessment of cranial morphology place dingo Cooinda within population-level variation for Alpine dingoes. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain tissue show she had a larger cranial capacity than a similar-sized domestic dog. Conclusions These combined data support the hypothesis that the dingo Cooinda fits the spectrum of genetic and morphological characteristics typical of the Alpine ecotype. We propose that she be considered the archetype specimen for future research investigating the evolutionary history, morphology, physiology, and ecology of dingoes. The female has been taxidermically prepared and is now at the Australian Museum, Sydney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J William O Ballard
- School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
- Department of Environment and Genetics, SABE, La Trobe University, Melbourne Victoria 3086, Australia
| | - Matt A Field
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Science, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia
- Immunogenomics Lab, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard J Edwards
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Laura A B Wilson
- School of Archaeology and Anthropology, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2600, Australia
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Loukas G Koungoulos
- Department of Archaeology, School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia 2006
| | - Benjamin D Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705
| | - Barry Chernoff
- College of the Environment, Departments of Biology, and Earth & Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA
| | - Olga Dudchenko
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030 USA
- Center for Theoretical and Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Arina Omer
- Center for Theoretical and Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Jens Keilwagen
- Julius Kühn-Institut, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27 06484 Quedlinburg, Germany
| | | | - Ozren Bogdanovic
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Eva Chan
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- Statewide Genomics, New South Wales Health Pathology, 45 Watt St, Newcastle NSW 2300, Australia
| | - Robert Zammit
- Vineyard Veterinary Hospital, 703 Windsor Rd, Vineyard, NSW 2765, Australia
| | - Vanessa Hayes
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Erez Lieberman Aiden
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030 USA
- Center for Theoretical and Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
- UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
- Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, ShanghaiTech, Pudong 201210, China
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cairns KM, Crowther MS, Nesbitt B, Letnic M. The myth of wild dogs in Australia: are there any out there? AUSTRALIAN MAMMALOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1071/am20055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Hybridisation between wild and domestic canids is a global conservation and management issue. In Australia, dingoes are a distinct lineage of wild-living canid with a controversial domestication status. They are mainland Australia’s apex terrestrial predator. There is ongoing concern that the identity of dingoes has been threatened from breeding with domestic dogs, and that feral dogs have established populations in rural Australia. We collate the results of microsatellite DNA testing from 5039 wild canids to explore patterns of domestic dog ancestry in dingoes and observations of feral domestic dogs across the continent. Only 31 feral dogs were detected, challenging the perception that feral dogs are widespread in Australia. First generation dingo × dog hybrids were similarly rare, with only 27 individuals identified. Spatial patterns of genetic ancestry across Australia identified that dingo populations in northern, western and central Australia were largely free from domestic dog introgression. Our findings challenge the perception that dingoes are virtually extinct in the wild and that feral dogs are common. A shift in terminology from wild dog to dingo would better reflect the identity of these wild canids and allow more nuanced debate about the balance between conservation and management of dingoes in Australia.
Collapse
|
8
|
Greig K, Rawlence NJ. The Contribution of Kurī (Polynesian Dog) to the Ecological Impacts of the Human Settlement of Aotearoa New Zealand. Front Ecol Evol 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.757988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The pre-human Aotearoa New Zealand fauna was dominated by avian and reptilian species. Prior to first human settlement by East Polynesian colonists, the top predators were two giant raptorial birds. Aside from humans themselves, colonisation also resulted in the simultaneous introduction of two novel mammalian predators into this naive ecosystem, the kiore (Pacific rat) and kurī (Polynesian dog). While the ecological impacts of kiore are relatively well understood, those of kurī are difficult to assess, and as such kurī have frequently been disregarded as having any meaningful impact on New Zealand’s biodiversity. Here we use the archaeological and palaeoecological record to reassess the potential impacts of kurī on this ecosystem. We argue that far from being confined to villages, kurī could have had a significant widespread but relatively localised impact on New Zealand’s avian, reptilian and marine mammal (seals and sea lions) fauna as a novel predator of medium-sized species. In this way, kurī potentially amplified the already significant impacts of Polynesian colonists and their descendants on New Zealand’s ecosystem, prior to European arrival. As such, kurī should be included in models of human impact in addition to over-hunting, environmental modification and predation by kiore.
Collapse
|