Autocrine activation of the pheromone response pathway in matalpha2- cells is attenuated by SST2- and ASG7-dependent mechanisms

Limits to transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mating-type switching in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae relies on the Sir protein complex to silence HML and HMR, the two loci containing copies of the alleles of the mating type locus, MAT. Sir-based transcriptional silencing has been considered locus-specific, but the recent discovery of rare and transient escapes from silencing at HMLα2 with a sensitive assay called to question if these events extend to the whole locus. Adapting the same assay, we measured that transient silencing failures at HML were more frequent for the α2 gene than α1, similarly to their expression level in unsilenced cells. By coupling a mating assay, at HML we found that one of the two genes at that locus can be transiently expressed while the other gene is maintained silent. Thus, transient silencing loss can be a property of the gene rather than the locus. Cells lacking the SIR1 gene experience epigenetic bistability at HML and HMR. Our previous result led us to ask if HML could allow for two independent epigenetic states within the locus in a sir1Δ mutant. A simple construct using a double fluorescent reporter at HMLα1 and HMLα2 ruled out this possibility. Each HML locus displayed a single epigenetic state. We revisited the question of the correlation between the states of two HML loci in diploid cells, and showed they were independent. Finally, we determined the relative strength of gene repression achieved by Sir-based silencing with that achieved by the a1-α2 repressor.

Mechanisms that ensure monogamous mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Haploid cells of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae communicate using secreted pheromones and mate to form diploid zygotes. Mating is monogamous, resulting in the fusion of precisely one cell of each mating type. Monogamous mating in crowded conditions, where cells have access to more than one potential partner, raises the question of how multiple-mating outcomes are prevented. Here we identify mutants capable of mating with multiple partners, revealing the mechanisms that ensure monogamous mating. Before fusion, cells develop polarity foci oriented toward potential partners. Competition between these polarity foci within each cell leads to disassembly of all but one focus, thus favoring a single fusion event. Fusion promotes the formation of heterodimeric complexes between subunits that are uniquely expressed in each mating type. One complex shuts off haploid-specific gene expression, and the other shuts off the ability to respond to pheromone. Zygotes able to form either complex remain monogamous, but zygotes lacking both can re-mate.

Heterotrimeric G Protein-coupled Receptor Signaling in Yeast Mating Pheromone Response

The DNAs encoding the receptors that respond to the peptide mating pheromones of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae were isolated in 1985, and were the very first genes for agonist-binding heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to be cloned in any organism. Now, over 30 years later, this yeast and its receptors continue to provide a pathfinding experimental paradigm for investigating GPCR-initiated signaling and its regulation, as described in this retrospective overview.

Engineered quorum sensing using pheromone-mediated cell-to-cell communication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Population-density-dependent control of gene expression, or quorum sensing, is widespread in nature and is used to coordinate complex population-wide phenotypes through space and time. We have engineered quorum sensing in S. cerevisiae by rewiring the native pheromone communication system that is normally used by haploid cells to detect potential mating partners. In our system, populations consisting of only mating type "a" cells produce and respond to extracellular α-type pheromone by arresting growth and expressing GFP in a population-density-dependent manner. Positive feedback quorum sensing dynamics were tuned by varying α-pheromone production levels using different versions of the pheromone-responsive FUS1 promoter as well as different versions of pheromone genes (mfα1 or mfα2). In a second system, pheromone communication was rendered conditional upon the presence of aromatic amino acids in the growth medium by controlling α-pheromone expression with the aromatic amino acid responsive ARO9 promoter. In these circuits, pheromone communication and response could be fine-tuned according to aromatic amino acid type and concentration. The genetic control programs developed here are responsive to dynamic spatiotemporal and chemical cellular environments, resulting in up-regulation of gene expression. These programs could be used to control biochemical pathways for the production of fuels and chemicals that are toxic or place a heavy metabolic burden on cell growth.

Asymmetry in sexual pheromones is not required for ascomycete mating

BACKGROUND

We investigated the determinants of sexual identity in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The higher fungi are divided into the ascomycetes and the basidiomycetes. Most ascomycetes have two mating types: one (called α in yeasts and MAT1-1 in filamentous fungi) produces a small, unmodified, peptide pheromone, and the other (a in yeasts and MAT1-2 in filamentous fungi) produces a peptide pheromone conjugated to a C-terminal farnesyl group that makes it very hydrophobic. In the basidiomycetes, all pheromones are lipid-modified, and this difference is a distinguishing feature between the phyla. We asked whether the asymmetry in pheromone modification is required for successful mating in ascomycetes.

RESULTS

We cloned receptor and pheromone genes from a filamentous ascomycete and a basidiomycete and expressed these in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, to generate novel, alternative mating pairs. We find that two yeast cells can mate even when both cells secrete a-like or α-like peptides. Importantly, this is true regardless of whether the cells express the a- or α-mating-type loci, which control the expression of other, sex-specific genes, in addition to the pheromones and pheromone receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that the asymmetric pheromone modification is not required for successful mating of ascomycete fungi and confirm that, in budding yeast, the primary determinants of mating are the specificity of the receptors and their corresponding pheromones.

How a mycoparasite employs g-protein signaling: using the example of trichoderma

Mycoparasitic Trichoderma spp. act as potent biocontrol agents against a number of plant pathogenic fungi, whereupon the mycoparasitic attack includes host recognition followed by infection structure formation and secretion of lytic enzymes and antifungal metabolites leading to the host's death. Host-derived signals are suggested to be recognized by receptors located on the mycoparasite's cell surface eliciting an internal signal transduction cascade which results in the transcription of mycoparasitism-relevant genes. Heterotrimeric G proteins of fungi transmit signals originating from G-protein-coupled receptors mainly to the cAMP and the MAP kinase pathways resulting in regulation of downstream effectors. Components of the G-protein signaling machinery such as Gα subunits and G-protein-coupled receptors were recently shown to play crucial roles in Trichoderma mycoparasitism as they govern processes such as the production of extracellular cell wall lytic enzymes, the secretion of antifungal metabolites, and the formation of infection structures.

Multiple signals converge on a differentiation MAPK pathway

An important emerging question in the area of signal transduction is how information from different pathways becomes integrated into a highly coordinated response. In budding yeast, multiple pathways regulate filamentous growth, a complex differentiation response that occurs under specific environmental conditions. To identify new aspects of filamentous growth regulation, we used a novel screening approach (called secretion profiling) that measures release of the extracellular domain of Msb2p, the signaling mucin which functions at the head of the filamentous growth (FG) MAPK pathway. Secretion profiling of complementary genomic collections showed that many of the pathways that regulate filamentous growth (RAS, RIM101, OPI1, and RTG) were also required for FG pathway activation. This regulation sensitized the FG pathway to multiple stimuli and synchronized it to the global signaling network. Several of the regulators were required for MSB2 expression, which identifies the MSB2 promoter as a target “hub” where multiple signals converge. Accessibility to the MSB2 promoter was further regulated by the histone deacetylase (HDAC) Rpd3p(L), which positively regulated FG pathway activity and filamentous growth. Our findings provide the first glimpse of a global regulatory hierarchy among the pathways that control filamentous growth. Systems-level integration of signaling circuitry is likely to coordinate other regulatory networks that control complex behaviors.

Signal integration is an essential feature of information flow through signal transduction pathways. The mechanisms by which signals from multiple pathways become integrated into a coordinated response remain unclear. We show that multiple pathways that regulate filamentous growth converge on a differentiation-dependent MAPK pathway. Our findings indicate that more extensive communication occurs between signaling pathways that control the filamentation response than has previously been appreciated. We suggest that global communication hierarchies regulate information flow in other systems, particularly higher eukaryotes where multiple pathways typically function simultaneously to modulate a complex response.

Yeast mating: a model system for studying cell and nuclear fusion

Haploid yeast cells mate to form a zygote, whose progeny are diploid cells. A fundamentally sexual event, related to fertilization, yeast mating nevertheless exhibits cytological properties that appear similar to somatic cell fusion. A large collection of mutations that lead to defects in various stages of mating, including cell fusion, has allowed a detailed dissection of the overall pathway. Recent advances in imaging methods, together with powerful methods of genetic analysis, make yeast mating a superb platform for investigation of cell fusion. An understanding of yeast cell fusion will provide insight into fundamental mechanisms of cell signaling, cell polarization, and membrane fusion.

Magnificent seven: roles of G protein-coupled receptors in extracellular sensing in fungi

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of transmembrane receptors and are responsible for transducing extracellular signals into intracellular responses that involve complex intracellular-signaling networks. This review highlights recent research advances in fungal GPCRs, including classification, extracellular sensing, and G protein-signaling regulation. The involvement of GPCRs in pheromone and nutrient sensing has been studied extensively over the past decade. Following recent advances in fungal genome sequencing projects, a panoply of GPCR candidates has been revealed and some have been documented to play key roles sensing diverse extracellular signals, such as pheromones, sugars, amino acids, nitrogen sources, and even photons. Identification and deorphanization of additional putative GPCRs may require the development of new research tools. Here, we compare research on GPCRs in fungi with information derived from mammalian systems to provide a useful road map on how to better understand ligand-GPCR-G protein interactions in general. We also emphasize the utility of yeast as a discovery tool for systemic studies of GPCRs from other organisms.

Interspecies variation reveals a conserved repressor of alpha-specific genes in Saccharomyces yeasts

The mating-type determination circuit in Saccharomyces yeast serves as a classic paradigm for the genetic control of cell type in all eukaryotes. Using comparative genetics, we discovered a central and conserved, yet previously undetected, component of this genetic circuit: active repression of alpha-specific genes in a cells. Upon inactivation of the SUM1 gene in Saccharomyces bayanus, a close relative of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a cells acquired mating characteristics of alpha cells and displayed autocrine activation of their mating response pathway. Sum1 protein bound to the promoters of alpha-specific genes, repressing their transcription. In contrast to the standard model, alpha1 was important but not required for alpha-specific gene activation and mating of alpha cells in the absence of Sum1. Neither Sum1 protein expression, nor its association with target promoters was mating-type-regulated. Thus, the alpha1/Mcm1 coactivators did not overcome repression by occluding Sum1 binding to DNA. Surprisingly, the mating-type regulatory function of Sum1 was conserved in S. cerevisiae. We suggest that a comprehensive understanding of some genetic pathways may be best attained through the expanded phenotypic space provided by study of those pathways in multiple related organisms.

A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway

The intracellular signal transduction pathway by which the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to the presence of peptide mating pheromone in its surroundings is one of the best understood signaling pathways in eukaryotes, yet continues to generate new surprises and insights. In this review, we take a brief walk down the pathway, focusing on how the signal is transmitted from the cell-surface receptor-coupled G protein, via a MAP kinase cascade, to the nucleus.

A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway

The intracellular signal transduction pathway by which the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to the presence of peptide mating pheromone in its surroundings is one of the best understood signaling pathways in eukaryotes, yet continues to generate new surprises and insights. In this review, we take a brief walk down the pathway, focusing on how the signal is transmitted from the cell-surface receptor-coupled G protein, via a MAP kinase cascade, to the nucleus.