Racial and ethnic disparities in diagnostic efficacy of comprehensive genetic testing for sensorineural hearing loss

Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of OTOGL-Associated Hearing Loss Identified in a Cohort of 7065 Japanese Patients with Hearing Loss

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Hearing loss is one of the most common sensorineural impairments, and approximately 60% of early-onset cases are due to genetic variations. The otogelin-like protein, encoded by the OTOGL gene, is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear, such as the tectorial membrane, and is thought to play an important role in cochlear amplification. OTOGL gene variants are a rare cause of hearing loss such as DFNB84B, a mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss presenting in early childhood with autosomal recessive inheritance. In this study, we aim to enhance our comprehension of the phenotypes of hearing loss caused by OTOGL variants.

METHODS

A total of 7056 Japanese patients with hearing loss were recruited, and based on massively parallel DNA sequencing on 158 target genes, we selected patients with biallelic OTOGL variants.

RESULTS

Ten affected individuals with OTOGL gene variants were detected, the largest group of patients yet to be reported, and eight of the eleven variants were novel. Our results showed that variations in this gene led to mild-to-moderate non-progressive hearing loss, and the accompanying symptoms, mainly vestibular symptoms, were speculated to present in adulthood.

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of the phenotypes of genes causative of hearing loss is expected to greatly benefit patients with hearing loss as it can assist in predicting outcomes and lead to appropriate intervention, which, in OTOGL-associated hearing loss cases, is based around the fact that the patients need not be concerned with deterioration in hearing, but require careful follow-up for vestibular symptoms.

Trends in the diagnosis of paediatric sensorineural hearing loss: a scoping review of gene panels, exome and genome sequencing

OBJECTIVE

To review recent advances in genetic diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) using gene panels, exome, and genome sequencing.

DESIGN

A scoping review. Articles published from January 2022 to May 2024 on gene panels, exome, or genome sequencing for early SNHL diagnosis were reviewed.

STUDY SAMPLE

After removing duplicates and abstract and full-text review, 26 articles met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Approximately, 60% of SNHL cases are genetic, with over 148 genes linked to non-syndromic forms and 700-800 associated but unconfirmed. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has transformed etiologic diagnosis, with yields up to 79% depending on test and population. Exome sequencing achieves 40-60% diagnostic accuracy for bilateral SNHL and 1-5% for unilateral, rising to 18.3% with syndromic cases. However, challenges persist in cost, test performance, and variant interpretation, with newborn screening potentially missing 25-30% of SNHL cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings underscore the need for optimised screening, robust variant interpretation frameworks, and personalised counselling. Diagnostic approaches should be tailored, with NGS gene panels or exome sequencing recommended for bilateral cases and unilateral cases after excluding non-genetic causes. Genome sequencing may be pursued if no genetic cause is found, with follow-up. Integrating genetic diagnostics into standard care could improve outcomes and interventions for SNHL patients.

Systematic comparison of phenome-wide admixture mapping and genome-wide association in a diverse biobank

Biobank-scale association studies that include Hispanic/Latino(a) (HL) and African American (AA) populations remain underrepresented, limiting the discovery of disease associated genetic factors in these groups. We present here a systematic comparison of phenome-wide admixture mapping (AM) and genome-wide association (GWAS) using data from the diverse Bio Me biobank in New York City. Our analysis highlights 77 genome-wide significant AM signals, 48 of which were not detected by GWAS, emphasizing the complementary nature of these two approaches. AM-tagged variants show significantly higher minor allele frequency and population differentiation (Fst) while GWAS demonstrated higher odds ratios, underscoring the distinct genetic architecture identified by each method. This study offers a comprehensive phenome-wide AM resource, demonstrating its utility in uncovering novel genetic associations in underrepresented populations, particularly for variants missed by traditional GWAS approaches.

Genetic testing for pediatric sensorineural hearing loss in the era of gene therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize indications, methods, and diagnostic yields for genetic testing for pediatric hearing loss.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genetic testing has become a cornerstone of clinical care for children with sensorineural hearing loss. Recent studies have shown the efficacy of gene panels and exome sequencing for any child with sensorineural hearing loss. Recent findings have underscored the importance of a diagnosis in clinical care. Clinical trials for gene therapy for hearing loss have begun.

SUMMARY

Genetic testing has become critical for personalized care for children with hearing loss. Recent studies have shown a 43% overall diagnostic yield for genetic testing for pediatric hearing loss, though the diagnostic yield may range from 10 to 60% depending on clinical features. Syndromic diagnoses comprise 25% of positive genetic tests for pediatric sensorineural hearing loss. While diagnostic yield is lower for children with unilateral or asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss, the likelihood of syndromic hearing loss finding is higher. An early and accurate genetic diagnosis is required for participating in clinical trials for gene therapy for hearing loss.

Molecular genetic diagnostics for inherited retinal dystrophies in the clinical setting

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the success of diagnostic genetic testing in inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) patients in the clinical setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 446 consecutive participants from diverse ethnic backgrounds living in western Canada.

METHODS

Clinical information was collected from participants, including family history, and they underwent a full ophthalmic examination with chart review. Those with a suspected IRD were offered panel-based genetic testing of 351 genes between March 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022. The main outcome measure was effect of the genetic testing results on clinical diagnosis.

RESULTS

Genetic testing established a conclusive molecular diagnosis in 249 of 446 cases (55.8%), a clearly negative result in 90 of 446 cases (20.1%), and an inconclusive diagnosis in 108 of 446 cases (24.2%). Conclusive disease-causing variants were identified in 69 genes, and the most commonly affected genes were ABCA4 (31 variants), USH2A (25 variants), and RPGR (19 variants). The inconclusive group included likely novel autosomal dominant variants or a pathogenic variant with a variant of uncertain significance in the same gene for a recessive phenotype. Notably, an inconclusive molecular genetic diagnosis was seen in as many as 47.3% of East Asian participants with an outer retinal dystrophy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the largest review of molecular genetic testing in IRDs in Canada. That negative or inconclusive results obtained in approximately 45% of cases demonstrates that there is an important need for new research into molecular genetic causes of IRDs. This is particularly true in addressing the problem of interpreting a variant of uncertain significance in ethnic minorities.

Prevalence of Mendelian Kidney Disease Among Patients With High-Risk APOL1 Genotypes Undergoing Commercial Genetic Testing in the United States

Introduction

Among individuals with high-risk APOL1 genotypes, the lifetime risk of developing kidney failure is ∼15%, indicating that other genetic variants or nongenetic modifiers likely contribute substantially to an individual patient's risk of progressive kidney disease. Here, we estimate the prevalence and distribution of Mendelian kidney diseases among patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes undergoing commercial genetic testing in the United States.

Methods

We analyzed clinical exome sequencing data from 15,181 individuals undergoing commercial genetic testing for Mendelian kidney disease in the United States from 2020 to 2021. We identified patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes by the presence of G1/G1, G1/G2, or G2/G2 alleles. Patients carrying single risk APOL1 alleles were identified as G1/G0, G2/G0; the remainder of patients were G0/G0. We estimated the prevalence and distribution of Mendelian kidney disease stratified by APOL1 genotype and genetically predicted ancestry.

Results

Of 15,181 patients, 3119 had genetic testing results consistent with a molecular diagnosis of Mendelian kidney disease (20.5%). Of 15,181 patients, 1035 (6.8%) had high-risk APOL1 genotypes. Among patients with recent genomic African ancestry, the prevalence of Mendelian kidney diseases was lower in those with high-risk APOL1 genotypes (9.6%; n = 91/944) compared with single risk APOL1 allele carriers (13.6%; n = 198/1453) and those with G0/G0 APOL1 genotypes (16.6%; n = 213/1281). Among patients with Mendelian kidney disease and recent genomic African ancestry, we observed differences in the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in PKD1 (19.8% in high-risk vs. 30.2% in low-risk genotypes), and COL4A4 (24.2% in high-risk vs. 10.5% in low-risk genotypes).

Conclusion

In this selected population of patients undergoing clinical genetic testing, we found evidence of Mendelian kidney disease in ∼10% patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes.

Shortcomings of ethnicity-based carrier screening for conditions associated with Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry

Purpose

Carrier screening identifies reproductive risk for autosomal recessive and X-linked genetic conditions. Currently, some medical society guidelines continue to recommend ethnicity-based carrier screening for conditions associated with Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) ancestry. We assessed the utility and limitations of these guidelines in a large, ethnically and genetically diverse cohort of genotyped individuals.

Methods

We characterized the self-reported ethnicity and genetic ancestry of over 110,000 consenting research participants identified as heterozygous for pathogenic variants associated with 15 autosomal recessive conditions recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for screening in individuals of AJ descent.

Results

Out of 7.2 million research participants, 116,517 research participants were identified as heterozygous for pathogenic variants associated with 15 conditions evaluated. The majority (54.9%) of heterozygotes did not report qualifying ethnicity under American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ethnicity-based screening guidelines. Approximately half (51.3%) of all individuals heterozygous for pathogenic variants in genes associated with 1 or more conditions recommended to be screened exclusively in individuals of AJ descent had <20% computed AJ ancestry.

Conclusion

Ethnicity-based carrier screening leads to the under detection of heterozygotes and associated reproductive risk for conditions historically associated with AJ ancestry.

Sociodemographic Disparities in Educational Services in Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

OBJECTIVE

Examine the association between sociodemographic factors and Individualized Education Program (IEP) establishment.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Participants included deaf or hard-of-hearing children who were eligible for an IEP with "deafness" or "hard of hearing" as a primary or secondary disability. Primary outcome measures were time intervals between initial referral for services and parental consent; parental consent to determination of eligibility; and initial referral to eligibility (the sum of the previous 2 intervals). Student's t tests and linear regression were used to examine the association between sociodemographic factors and the primary outcome variables.

RESULTS

Of the 88 participants, 51 (58%) were male, 45 (51%) were from underrepresented minority (URM) groups, 35 (40%) spoke a primary language other than English, and 53 (60%) utilized public insurance. IEP establishment was significantly delayed in participants who required an English-language interpreter. Most of the delay occurred in the time between the initial referral and parental consent (mean: 115 vs 37 days, P = .02). There were also significant delays from the time of referral for services to eligibility in URM participants (mean: 159 vs 85 days, P = .04). Significant delays were also associated with Minority Status and Language within social vulnerability index percentile rankings.

CONCLUSION

This study found that IEP establishment was delayed in both URM participants and those who required an English-language interpreter. These results highlight the importance of clear communication between the school system and caregivers in the IEP establishment process, particularly with families who require an English-language interpreter or identify as URM.

Hearing Loss: Genetic Testing, Current Advances and the Situation in Latin America

Congenital hearing loss is the most common birth defect, estimated to affect 2-3 in every 1000 births, with ~50-60% of those related to genetic causes. Technological advances enabled the identification of hundreds of genes related to hearing loss (HL), with important implications for patients, their families, and the community. Despite these advances, in Latin America, the population with hearing loss remains underdiagnosed, with most studies focusing on a single locus encompassing the GJB2/GJB6 genes. Here we discuss how current and emerging genetic knowledge has the potential to alter the approach to diagnosis and management of hearing loss, which is the current situation in Latin America, and the barriers that still need to be overcome.

Genetic ancestry and diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in a diverse population

It has been suggested that diagnostic yield (DY) from Exome Sequencing (ES) may be lower among patients with non-European ancestries than those with European ancestry. We examined the association of DY with estimated continental/subcontinental genetic ancestry in a racially/ethnically diverse pediatric and prenatal clinical cohort. Cases (N = 845) with suspected genetic disorders underwent ES for diagnosis. Continental/subcontinental genetic ancestry proportions were estimated from the ES data. We compared the distribution of genetic ancestries in positive, negative, and inconclusive cases by Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and linear associations of ancestry with DY by Cochran-Armitage trend tests. We observed no reduction in overall DY associated with any genetic ancestry (African, Native American, East Asian, European, Middle Eastern, South Asian). However, we observed a relative increase in proportion of autosomal recessive homozygous inheritance versus other inheritance patterns associated with Middle Eastern and South Asian ancestry, due to consanguinity. In this empirical study of ES for undiagnosed pediatric and prenatal genetic conditions, genetic ancestry was not associated with the likelihood of a positive diagnosis, supporting the equitable use of ES in diagnosis of previously undiagnosed but potentially Mendelian disorders across all ancestral populations.

Are children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss receiving cochlear implants?

INTRODUCTION

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted its first approval for cochlear implants (CI) in children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in 1990. In 2019, the FDA expanded CI indications to include children with unilateral SNHL.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of children with unilateral SNHL in the population of new pediatric CI recipients between 2012 and 2021.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Pediatric database examined patients under 18 years of age with bilateral or unilateral SNHL who underwent CI between 2012 and 2021. Current Procedural Terminology code 69930 identified patients with 'cochlear device implantation, with or without mastoidectomy.' The percentage of children undergoing CI for unilateral versus bilateral SNHL during the study period was calculated and subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

9863 pediatric CI patients were included with a mean age of 5.1 (95 % CI 5.1-5.2) years at the time of implantation. 7.5 % (N = 739) of patients had unilateral SNHL and 92.5 % (N = 9124) had bilateral SNHL. Children with bilateral SNHL undergoing CI were significantly younger (5.0 years versus 6.9 years for those with unilateral SNHL, p < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of children receiving CI for unilateral versus bilateral SNHL (3.3 % in 2012 to 14.3 % in 2021, p < .001) before and after the FDA changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of CIs placed for unilateral SNHL has increased annually even before 2019 when the FDA expanded its CI indications to include children with unilateral SNHL for the first time.

Dispersed DNA variants underlie hearing loss in South Florida's minority population

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the genetic causes of sensorineural hearing loss in racial and ethnic minorities of South Florida by reviewing demographic, phenotypic, and genetic data on 136 patients presenting to the Hereditary Hearing Loss Clinic at the University of Miami. In our retrospective chart review, of these patients, half self-identified as Hispanic, and the self-identified racial distribution was 115 (86%) White, 15 (11%) Black, and 6 (4%) Asian. Our analysis helps to reduce the gap in understanding the prevalence, impact, and genetic factors related to hearing loss among diverse populations.

RESULTS

The causative gene variant or variants were identified in 54 (40%) patients, with no significant difference in the molecular diagnostic rate between Hispanics and Non-Hispanics. However, the total solve rate based on race was 40%, 47%, and 17% in Whites, Blacks, and Asians, respectively. In Non-Hispanic Whites, 16 different variants were identified in 13 genes, with GJB2 (32%), MYO7A (11%), and SLC26A4 (11%) being the most frequently implicated genes. In White Hispanics, 34 variants were identified in 20 genes, with GJB2 (22%), MYO7A (7%), and STRC-CATSPER2 (7%) being the most common. In the Non-Hispanic Black cohort, the gene distribution was evenly dispersed, with 11 variants occurring in 7 genes, and no variant was identified in 3 Hispanic Black probands. For the Asian cohort, only one gene variant was found out of 6 patients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the diagnostic rate of genetic studies in hearing loss varies according to race in South Florida, with more heterogeneity in racial and ethnic minorities. Further studies to delineate deafness gene variants in underrepresented populations, such as African Americans/Blacks from Hispanic groups, are much needed to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in genetic diagnoses.

Characteristics of hearing loss-associated gene mutations: A multi-center study of 119,606 neonates in Gannan

BACKGROUND

HL is the second most common congenital disability in China, and its high incidence brings a serious burden of medical and educational sequelae. HL genetic screening enables the identification of individuals with inherited HL and carriers in a large scale.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure the detection rates of hearing loss (HL)-associated gene mutations in the Gannan population. The molecular etiology and risk factors of hereditary HL were also analyzed.

METHODS

In total, 119,606 newborns from 18 districts of Gannan were enrolled in this multi-center study conducted between April 2019 and April 2021. Otoacoustic Emission (OAE) was used for primary hearing screening 3 days after birth in quiet conditions, and OAE combined with automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) was applied 29-42 days after birth for those who failed or missed the initial screening. Meanwhile, high-throughput sequencing of hotspot HL-associated mutations in GJB2, GJB3, MTRNR1, and SLC26A4 were performed.

RESULTS

Among the 119,606 newborns, 7796 (6.52%) failed the hearing screening. Genetic screening revealed that 5092 neonates (4.26%) carried HL-associated mutations. The detection rate of GJB2, SLC26A4, MTRNR1 and GJB3 mutations were 2.09%, 1.51%, 0.42% and 0.24%, respectively. The most prevalent variant was GJB2 c.235delC (1.74%). The second most prevalent variant was SLC26A4 c.919-2A > G (0.93%). The population who failed the hearing screening had a lower proportion (24.64%) of SLC26A4 gene variants compared to the population who passed (37.46%). Genetic screening identified 4612 (3.86%) carriers who were normal in hearing screenings. The concurrent hearing and genetic screening identified 480 (0.40%) neonates at high risk for hereditary HL.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the concurrent hearing screening and high-throughput genetic screening would greatly improve the effectiveness of newborn HL programs. This integration also facilitates the management of congenital HL, and aids in the prevention of aminoglycoside antibiotics-induced HL.

Rates and Classification of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Hereditary Disease Genetic Testing

Importance

Variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) are rampant in clinical genetic testing, frustrating clinicians, patients, and laboratories because the uncertainty hinders diagnoses and clinical management. A comprehensive assessment of VUSs across many disease genes is needed to guide efforts to reduce uncertainty.

Objective

To describe the sources, gene distribution, and population-level attributes of VUSs and to evaluate the impact of the different types of evidence used to reclassify them.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used germline DNA variant data from individuals referred by clinicians for diagnostic genetic testing for hereditary disorders. Participants included individuals for whom gene panel testing was conducted between September 9, 2014, and September 7, 2022. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2022, to April 1, 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcomes of interest were VUS rates (stratified by age; clinician-reported race, ethnicity, and ancestry groups; types of gene panels; and variant attributes), percentage of VUSs reclassified as benign or likely benign vs pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and enrichment of evidence types used for reclassifying VUSs.

Results

The study cohort included 1 689 845 individuals ranging in age from 0 to 89 years at time of testing (median age, 50 years), with 1 203 210 (71.2%) female individuals. There were 39 150 Ashkenazi Jewish individuals (2.3%), 64 730 Asian individuals (3.8%), 126 739 Black individuals (7.5%), 5539 French Canadian individuals (0.3%), 169 714 Hispanic individuals (10.0%), 5058 Native American individuals (0.3%), 2696 Pacific Islander individuals (0.2%), 4842 Sephardic Jewish individuals (0.3%), and 974 383 White individuals (57.7%). Among all individuals tested, 692 227 (41.0%) had at least 1 VUS and 535 385 (31.7%) had only VUS results. The number of VUSs per individual increased as more genes were tested, and most VUSs were missense changes (86.6%). More VUSs were observed per sequenced gene in individuals who were not from a European White population, in middle-aged and older adults, and in individuals who underwent testing for disorders with incomplete penetrance. Of 37 699 unique VUSs that were reclassified, 30 239 (80.2%) were ultimately categorized as benign or likely benign. A mean (SD) of 30.7 (20.0) months elapsed for VUSs to be reclassified to benign or likely benign, and a mean (SD) of 22.4 (18.9) months elapsed for VUSs to be reclassified to pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Clinical evidence contributed most to reclassification.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study of approximately 1.6 million individuals highlighted the need for better methods for interpreting missense variants, increased availability of clinical and experimental evidence for variant classification, and more diverse representation of race, ethnicity, and ancestry groups in genomic databases. Data from this study could provide a sound basis for understanding the sources and resolution of VUSs and navigating appropriate next steps in patient care.

Newborn Screening for Neurodevelopmental Disorders May Exacerbate Health Disparities

Newborn screening (NBS) began in the early 1960s with screening for phenylketonuria on blood collected on filter paper. The number of conditions included in NBS programs expanded significantly with the adoption of tandem mass spectrometry. The recommended uniform screening panel provides national guidance and has reduced state variability. Universality and uniformity have been supported to promote equity. Recently, a number of researchers have suggested expanding NBS to include genomic sequencing to identify all genetic disorders in newborns. This has been specifically suggested for genes that increase the risk for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), with the presumption that early identification in the newborn period would reduce disabilities. We offer arguments to show that genomic sequencing of newborns for NDDs risks exacerbating disparities. First, the diagnosis of NDD requires clinical expertise, and both genetic and neurodevelopmental expertise are in short supply, leading to disparities in access to timely follow-up. Second, therapies for children with NDDs are insufficient to meet their needs. Increasing early identification for those at risk who may never manifest developmental delays could shift limited resources to those children whose parents are more poised to advocate, worsening disparities in access to services. Rather, we suggest an alternative: genomic sequencing of all children with diagnosed NDDs. This focused strategy would have the potential to target genomic sequencing at children who manifest NDDs across diverse populations which could better improve our understanding of contributory genes to NDDs.

Molecular diagnostic yield of genome sequencing versus targeted gene panel testing in racially and ethnically diverse pediatric patients

PURPOSE

Adoption of genome sequencing (GS) as a first-line test requires evaluation of its diagnostic yield. We evaluated the GS and targeted gene panel (TGP) testing in diverse pediatric patients (probands) with suspected genetic conditions.

METHODS

Probands with neurologic, cardiac, or immunologic conditions were offered GS and TGP testing. Diagnostic yield was compared using a fully paired study design.

RESULTS

A total of 645 probands (median age 9 years) underwent genetic testing, and 113 (17.5%) received a molecular diagnosis. Among 642 probands with both GS and TGP testing, GS yielded 106 (16.5%) and TGPs yielded 52 (8.1%) diagnoses (P < .001). Yield was greater for GS vs TGPs in Hispanic/Latino(a) (17.2% vs 9.5%, P < .001) and White/European American (19.8% vs 7.9%, P < .001) but not in Black/African American (11.5% vs 7.7%, P = .22) population groups by self-report. A higher rate of inconclusive results was seen in the Black/African American (63.8%) vs White/European American (47.6%; P = .01) population group. Most causal copy number variants (17 of 19) and mosaic variants (6 of 8) were detected only by GS.

CONCLUSION

GS may yield up to twice as many diagnoses in pediatric patients compared with TGP testing but not yet across all population groups.

Exome Sequencing Expands the Genetic Diagnostic Spectrum for Pediatric Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

Genetic testing is the standard-of-care for diagnostic evaluation of bilateral, symmetric, sensorineural hearing loss (HL). We sought to determine the efficacy of a comprehensive genetic testing method, exome sequencing (ES), in a heterogeneous pediatric patient population with bilateral symmetric, bilateral asymmetric, and unilateral HL.

METHODS

Trio-based ES was performed for pediatric patients with confirmed HL including those with symmetric, asymmetric, and unilateral HL.

RESULTS

ES was completed for 218 probands. A genetic cause was identified for 31.2% of probands (n = 68). The diagnostic rate was 40.7% for bilateral HL, 23.1% for asymmetric HL, and 18.3% for unilateral HL, with syndromic diagnoses made in 20.8%, 33.3%, and 54.5% of cases in each group, respectively. Secondary or incidental findings were identified in 10 families (5.52%).

CONCLUSION

ES is an effective method for genetic diagnosis for HL including phenotypically diverse patients and allows the identification of secondary findings, discovery of deafness-causing genes, and the potential for efficient data re-analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:2417-2424, 2023.

Applications of artificial intelligence in clinical laboratory genomics

The transition from analog to digital technologies in clinical laboratory genomics is ushering in an era of "big data" in ways that will exceed human capacity to rapidly and reproducibly analyze those data using conventional approaches. Accurately evaluating complex molecular data to facilitate timely diagnosis and management of genomic disorders will require supportive artificial intelligence methods. These are already being introduced into clinical laboratory genomics to identify variants in DNA sequencing data, predict the effects of DNA variants on protein structure and function to inform clinical interpretation of pathogenicity, link phenotype ontologies to genetic variants identified through exome or genome sequencing to help clinicians reach diagnostic answers faster, correlate genomic data with tumor staging and treatment approaches, utilize natural language processing to identify critical published medical literature during analysis of genomic data, and use interactive chatbots to identify individuals who qualify for genetic testing or to provide pre-test and post-test education. With careful and ethical development and validation of artificial intelligence for clinical laboratory genomics, these advances are expected to significantly enhance the abilities of geneticists to translate complex data into clearly synthesized information for clinicians to use in managing the care of their patients at scale.

Sarcomeric gene variants among Indians with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A scoping review

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic heart muscle disease that frequently causes sudden cardiac death (SCD) among young adults. Several pathogenic mutations in genes encoding the cardiac sarcomere have been identified as diagnostic factors for HCM and proposed as prognostic markers for SCD. The objective of this review was to determine the scope of available literature on the variants encoding sarcomere proteins associated with SCD reported among Indian patients with HCM. The eligibility criteria for the scoping review included full text articles that reported the results of genetic screening for sarcomeric gene mutations in HCM patients of Indian south Asian ancestry. We systematically reviewed studies from the databases of Medline, Scopus, Web of Science core collection and Google Scholar. The electronic search strategy included a combination of generic terms related to genetics, disease and population. The protocol of the study was registered with Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/53gde/). A total of 19 articles were identified that reported pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants within MYH7, MYBPC3, TNNT2, TNNI3 and TPM1 genes, that included 16 singletons, one de novo and one digenic mutation (MYH7/ TPM1) associated with SCD among Indian patients. Evidence from functional studies and familial segregation implied a plausible mechanistic role of these P/LP variants in HCM pathology. This scoping review has compiled all the P/LP variants reported to-date among Indian patients and summarized their association with SCD. Single homozygous, de novo and digenic mutations were observed to be associated with severe phenotypes compared to single heterozygous mutations. The abstracted genetic information was updated with reference sequence ID (rsIDs) and compiled into freely accessible HCMvar database, available at https://hcmvar.heartfailure.org.in/. This can be used as a population specific genetic database for reference by clinicians and researchers involved in the identification of diagnostic and prognostic markers for HCM.

Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in a Diverse Pediatric and Prenatal Population is not Associated with Genetic Ancestry

Purpose

It has been hypothesized that diagnostic yield (DY) from Exome Sequencing (ES) may be lower among patients with non-European ancestries than those with European ancestry. We examined the association of DY with estimated continental genetic ancestry in a racially/ethnically diverse pediatric and prenatal clinical cohort.

Methods

Cases (N=845) with suspected genetic disorders underwent ES for diagnosis. Continental genetic ancestry proportions were estimated from the ES data. We compared the distribution of genetic ancestries in positive, negative, and inconclusive cases by Kolmogorov Smirnov tests and linear associations of ancestry with DY by Cochran-Armitage trend tests.

Results

We observed no reduction in overall DY associated with any continental genetic ancestry (Africa, America, East Asia, Europe, Middle East, South Asia). However, we observed a relative increase in proportion of autosomal recessive homozygous inheritance versus other inheritance patterns associated with Middle Eastern and South Asian ancestry, due to consanguinity.

Conclusions

In this empirical study of ES for undiagnosed pediatric and prenatal genetic conditions, genetic ancestry was not associated with the likelihood of a positive diagnosis, supporting the ethical and equitable use of ES in diagnosis of previously undiagnosed but potentially Mendelian disorders across all ancestral populations.

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Children With Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Diagnostic Yield and Predictors of a Genetic Cause

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic yield of targeted next-generation sequencing using hearing loss panels and to identify patient-related factors that are associated with a definite genetic cause.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Children with congenital or late-onset, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

INTERVENTIONS

Diagnostic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of patients with a definite genetic diagnosis.

RESULTS

We report on 238 patients with hearing loss: 130 were male and 108 were female. About 55% had congenital hearing loss. A genetic cause was identified in 94 of the patients (39.5%), with 72.3% of these showing nonsyndromic and 27.6% showing syndromic hearing loss. The diagnostic yield was highest among North African patients (66.7%). A multiple linear regression model shows that profound hearing loss, family history of hearing loss, congenital hearing loss, and North African ethnicity are significantly related to identifying a genetic cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted next-generation sequencing using a panel of hearing loss genes identified a genetic diagnosis in almost 40% of children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. We describe the predictors of a genetic diagnosis, and this information may be used during genetic counseling.

Molecular diagnostic yield of genome sequencing versus targeted gene panel testing in racially and ethnically diverse pediatric patients

Purpose

Adoption of genome sequencing (GS) as a first-line test requires evaluation of its diagnostic yield. We evaluated the GS and targeted gene panel (TGP) testing in diverse pediatric patients (probands) with suspected genetic conditions.

Methods

Probands with neurologic, cardiac, or immunologic conditions were offered GS and TGP testing. Diagnostic yield was compared using a fully paired study design.

Results

645 probands (median age 9 years) underwent genetic testing, and 113 (17.5%) received a molecular diagnosis. Among 642 probands with both GS and TGP testing, GS yielded 106 (16.5%) and TGPs yielded 52 (8.1%) diagnoses ( P < .001). Yield was greater for GS vs . TGPs in Hispanic/Latino(a) (17.2% vs . 9.5%, P < .001) and White/European American (19.8% vs . 7.9%, P < .001), but not in Black/African American (11.5% vs . 7.7%, P = .22) population groups by self-report. A higher rate of inconclusive results was seen in the Black/African American (63.8%) vs . White/European American (47.6%; P = .01) population group. Most causal copy number variants (17 of 19) and mosaic variants (6 of 8) were detected only by GS.

Conclusion

GS may yield up to twice as many diagnoses in pediatric patients compared to TGP testing, but not yet across all population groups.

[Genetics of pediatric hearing loss]

With the rapid development of sequencing technology and bioinformatics, the genetic research and related clinical practice of pediatric hearing loss have also made significant progress. This review summarized and analyzed the genetic causes of hearing impairment in children and the research progress of related genetic diagnosis and screening, in order to provide reference for the prevention and treatment of pediatric hearing loss and related research.

Impact of Genetic Testing on Hearing Interventions

OBJECTIVE

Clinical guidelines recommend genetic testing when evaluating congenital and late-onset sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Genetic diagnoses can provide parents additional information regarding anticipated hearing loss progression, comorbid conditions, and family planning. Additionally, obtaining a genetic diagnosis may increase parental acceptance of hearing loss and subsequent pursuit of intervention. This study evaluates the association between genetic diagnoses and hearing loss intervention.

METHODS

We included children ages 0-18 years with SNHL who were hearing aid or cochlear implant candidates but non-users and underwent hearing-loss gene panel testing prior to initiating intervention. Univariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of hearing aid fitting or cochlear implantation. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated the impact of demographic and clinical factors on subsequent intervention.

RESULTS

Of the 385 children with SNHL who underwent hearing loss gene panel testing, 111 were included. Median age was 7.5 years. 56% were underrepresented minorities, 71% were non-White, and 71% were publicly insured. Those found to have a genetic diagnosis were 4.6 times as likely to subsequently undergo intervention (p = 0.035). Additionally, bilateral hearing loss and earlier age of genetic testing were associated with increased likelihood of intervention.

CONCLUSION

Up to half of children with SNHL are suspected to have an underlying genetic etiology. Children diagnosed with a genetic diagnosis are significantly more likely to subsequently utilize hearing aids or cochlear implantation. This provides additional support for clinical guidelines recommending genetic testing not only due to the impact of prognostication but also on treatment decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2022.

Outcomes of Gene Panel Testing for Sensorineural Hearing Loss in a Diverse Patient Cohort

IMPORTANCE

A genetic diagnosis can help elucidate the prognosis of hearing loss, thus significantly affecting management. Previous studies on diagnostic yield of hearing loss genetic tests have been based on largely homogenous study populations.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in a diverse population of children, accounting for sociodemographic and patient characteristics, and assess whether these diagnoses are associated with subsequent changes in clinical management.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study included 2075 patients seen at the Children's Communications Clinic, of whom 517 completed hearing loss gene panel testing between January 1, 2015, and November 1, 2021, at the University of California, San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospital system. From those 517 patients, 426 children with at least 2 audiograms were identified and analyzed. Data were gathered from November 2021 to January 2022 and analyzed from January to February 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The measures of interest were sociodemographic characteristics (age at testing, gender, race and ethnicity, primary language, and insurance type), hearing loss characteristics, and medical variables. The outcome was genetic testing results. Variables were compared with univariate and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 2075 patients seen at the Children's Communications Clinic, 517 (median [range] age, 8 [0-31] years; 264 [51.1%] male; 351 [67.9%] from an underrepresented minority [URM] group) underwent a hearing loss panel genetic test between January 1, 2015, and November 1, 2021. Among those 517 patients, 426 children (median [range] age, 8 [0-18] years; 221 [51.9%] male; 304 [71.4%] from an URM group) with 2 or more audiograms were included in a subsequent analysis. On multivariable logistic regression, age at testing (odds ratio [OR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97), URM group status (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.66), comorbidities (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.53), late-identified hearing loss (passed newborn hearing screen; OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.86), and unilateral hearing loss (OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.005-0.33) were the only factors associated with genetic diagnosis. No association was found between genetic diagnosis yield and other sociodemographic variables or hearing loss characteristics. Patients in URM and non-URM groups had statistically similar clinical features. A total of 32 of 109 children (29.4%) who received a genetic diagnosis received diagnoses that significantly affected prognosis because of identification of syndromic or progressive sensorineural hearing loss or auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder relating to otoferlin.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study's findings suggest that genetic testing may be broadly useful in improving clinical management of children with hearing loss. More research is warranted to discover and characterize diagnostic genes for those who have been historically underrepresented in research and medicine.

Racial and ethnic disparities in genetic testing for hearing loss: a systematic review and synthesis

Racial/ethnic disparities in the diagnostic efficacy of genetic testing for hearing loss have been described. These disparities may relate to differences in variant classification between different racial/ethnic groups, which may, in turn, derive from disparate representation of these groups in the published literature. We sought to quantify racial/ethnic disparities in the published literature on the human genetics of hearing loss. We conducted a search of PubMed for articles describing single-gene, multiple-gene, or whole-exome sequencing for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. Data on the included subjects, including race/ethnicity and/or region of origin, a number of subjects tested, and method of testing, were extracted. 1355 populations representing 311,092 subjects from 1165 studies were included. Overall, subjects of European and Asian ancestry were equivalently represented, but those of Latino American, African, and indigenous North American ancestry were significantly underrepresented; over 96% of all subjects in the published literature were European or Asian. Within populations, the majority of subjects derived from a small subset of countries. The observed disparity was greater for multiple-gene and whole-exome sequencing than for single-gene sequencing. These findings illustrate the large disparity in the published literature on the genetics of hearing loss, and demonstrate the need for increased representation of Latino American, African, and indigenous North American populations.