Advances in renal genetic diagnosis

A targeted gene panel illuminates pathogenesis in young people with unexplained kidney failure

BACKGROUND

Kidney failure in young people is often unexplained and a significant proportion will have an underlying genetic diagnosis. National Health Service England pioneered a comprehensive genomic testing service for such circumstances accessible to clinicians working outside of genetics. This is the first review of patients using this novel service since October 2021, following its introduction into clinical practice.

METHODS

The 'Unexplained Young-Onset End-Stage Renal Disease' (test-code R257) gene panel uses targeted next generation sequencing to analyse 175 genes associated with renal disease in patients under 36 years of age. All tests undertaken between October 2021 and February 2022 were reviewed. Phenotypic data were extracted from request forms and referring clinicians contacted where additional details were required.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients underwent R257 testing over the study period. Among them, 23/71 patients (32%) were confirmed to have a genetic diagnosis and 2/71 (3%) had a genetically suggestive variant. Nephronophthisis and Alport syndrome were the most common conditions identified, (4/23 (17%) with pathogenic variants in NPHP1 and 4/23 (17%) with pathogenic variants in COL4A3/COL4A4). Positive predictors of a genetic diagnosis included a family history of renal disease (60% of positive cases) and extra-renal disease manifestations (48% of positive cases).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate the R257 gene panel in unexplained young-onset kidney failure, freely accessible to patients meeting testing criteria in England. A genetic diagnosis was identified in 32% of patients. This study highlights the essential and expanding role that genomic testing has for children and families affected by renal disease today.

Comparison of different genetic testing modalities applied in paediatric patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) are monogenic in some cases, however, there are still no clear guidelines on genetic testing in the clinical practice of SRNS in children.

METHODS

Three hundred thirty-two children were diagnosed with SRNS, and all children underwent genetic testing, including gene panels and/or whole-exome/genome sequencing (WES/WGS), during treatment. We analysed the relationship between clinical manifestation and genotype, and compared different genetic testing methods' detection rates and prices.

RESULTS

In this study, 30.12% (100/332) of children diagnosed with SRNS had monogenic causes of the disease. With 33.7% (122/332) of children achieving complete remission, 88.5% (108/122) received steroids combined with tacrolimus (TAC). In detectability, WES increased by 8.69% (4/46) on gene panel testing, while WGS increased by 4.27% (5/117) on WES, and WES was approximately 1/7 of the price of WGS for every further 1% increase in pathogenicity.

CONCLUSIONS

We verified that steroids combined with TAC were the most effective option in paediatric SRNS. In detection efficiency, we found that WGS was the highest, followed by WES. The panel was the lowest, but the most cost-effective method when considering the economic-benefit ratio, and thus it should be recommended first in SRNS.

The same heterozygous Col4A4 mutation triggered different renal pathological changes in Chinese family members

Background: Mutations in the collagen components of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) often lead to hereditary glomerulonephritis. Previous studies have identified that autosomal dominant mutations of Col4A3, Col4A4 or Col4A5 are associated with thin basement membrane nephropathy (TBMN), Alport syndrome and other hereditary kidney diseases. However, the genetic mutations underlying other glomerulonephritis types have not been elucidated. Methods: In this study, we investigated a Chinese family with hereditary nephritis using the methods of genetic sequencing and renal biopsy. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood of the proband and her sister, and subsequently was performed genetic sequencing. They were found to have the similar mutation sites. Other family members were then validated using Sanger sequencing. The proband and her sister underwent renal puncture biopsies, and experienced pathologists performed PAS, Masson, immunofluorescence, and immunoelectron microscopic staining of the kidney tissue sections. Results: Through genetic sequencing analysis, we detected a novel heterozygous frameshift mutation c.1826delC in the COL4A4 (NM_000092.4) gene coding region, and 1 hybrid missense variation c.86G>A (p. R29Q) was also detected in the TNXB (NM_019105.6) gene coding region in several members of this Chinese family. Interestingly, we found that the same mutations caused different clinical features and distinct pathological changes in individual family members, which confirmed that pathological and genetic testing are crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary kidney diseases. Conclusion: In this study, we found a novel heterozygous mutation in Col4A4 and co-mutations of the TNXB gene in this Chinese family. Our study indicated that the same Col4A4 mutated variants produced different pathological and clinical changes in different family members. This discovery may provide novel insights into the study of hereditary kidney disease. In addition, new genetic biology techniques and renal biopsy of individual family members are essential.

The underestimated burden of monogenic kidney disease in adults waitlisted for kidney transplantation

Purpose

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major health-care burden. Increasing evidence suggests that a considerable proportion of patients are affected by a monogenic kidney disorder.

Methods

In this study, the kidney transplantation waiting list at the Charité was screened for patients with undetermined cause of CKD. By next-generation sequencing (NGS) we targeted all 600 genes described and associated with kidney disease or allied disorders.

Results

In total, 635 patients were investigated. Of these, 245 individuals had a known cause of CKD (38.5%) of which 119 had a proven genetic disease (e.g., ADPKD, Alport). The other 340 patients (53.5%) were classified as undetermined diagnosis, of whom 87 had kidney failure (KF) onset <40 years. To this latter group genetic testing was offered as well as to those patients (n = 29) with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and all individuals (n = 21) suspicious for thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in kidney biopsy. We detected diagnostic variants in 26 of 126 patients (20.6%) of which 14 of 126 (11.1%) were pathogenic or likely pathogenic. In another 12 of 126 (9.5%) patients, variants of unknown significance (VUS) were detected.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates the diagnostic value of comprehensive genetic testing among patients with undetermined CKD.

Look Alike, Sound Alike: Phenocopies in Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a clinical picture defined by the lack of response to standard steroid treatment, frequently progressing toward end-stage kidney disease. The genetic basis of SRNS has been thoroughly explored since the end of the 1990s and especially with the advent of next-generation sequencing. Genetic forms represent about 30% of cases of SRNS. However, recent evidence supports the hypothesis that "phenocopies" could account for a non-negligible fraction of SRNS patients who are currently classified as non-genetic, paving the way for a more comprehensive understanding of the genetic background of the disease. The identification of phenocopies is mandatory in order to provide patients with appropriate clinical management and to inform therapy. Extended genetic testing including phenocopy genes, coupled with reverse phenotyping, is recommended for all young patients with SRNS to avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful diagnostic procedures and treatment, and for the reclassification of the disease. The aim of this work is to review the main steps of the evolution of genetic testing in SRNS, demonstrating how a paradigm shifting from "forward" to "reverse" genetics could significantly improve the identification of the molecular mechanisms of the disease, as well as the overall clinical management of affected patients.

Genetic Study in Korean Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome or Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is one of the major causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in childhood and is mostly associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). More than 50 monogenic causes of SRNS or FSGS have been identified. Recently, the mutation detection rate in pediatric patients with SRNS has been reported to be approximately 30%. In this study, genotype-phenotype correlations in a cohort of 291 Korean pediatric patients with SRNS/FSGS were analyzed. The overall mutation detection rate was 43.6% (127 of 291 patients). WT1 was the most common causative gene (23.6%), followed by COQ6 (8.7%), NPHS1 (8.7%), NUP107 (7.1%), and COQ8B (6.3%). Mutations in COQ6, NUP107, and COQ8B were more frequently detected, and mutations in NPHS2 were less commonly detected in this cohort than in study cohorts from Western countries. The mutation detection rate was higher in patients with congenital onset, those who presented with proteinuria or chronic kidney disease/ESRD, and those who did not receive steroid treatment. Genetic diagnosis in patients with SRNS provides not only definitive diagnosis but also valuable information for decisions on treatment policy and prediction of prognosis. Therefore, further genotype-phenotype correlation studies are required.

Genetic tests in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a common cause of chronic kidney disease in children, and a considerable number of patients progress to end-stage renal disease. SRNS is a highly heterogeneous disorder, both clinically and genetically, and more than 50 monogenic causes of SRNS, including isolated and syndromic forms, have been identified. Recent large-cohort studies indicate that at least 30% of childhood-onset SRNS cases are genetic. The benefits of definitive molecular diagnosis by genetic testing include the avoidance of unnecessary and potentially harmful diagnostic procedures (e.g., kidney biopsy) and treatment (e.g., steroid and immunosuppressants), detection of rare and potentially treatable mutations (e.g., coenzyme Q10 biosynthesis pathway defect), prediction of prognosis (e.g., posttransplant recurrence), and providing precise genetic counseling. Furthermore, the identification of novel disease-causing genes could provide new insights into the pathogenic mechanisms of SRNS. Therefore, whenever accessible and affordable, genetic testing is recommended for all pediatric patients with SRNS, and should certainly be performed in patients with a higher probability of genetic predisposition based on genotype-phenotype correlation data. The genetic testing approach should be determined for each patient, and clinicians should, therefore, be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of methods currently available, which include Sanger sequencing, gene panel testing, and whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing. Importantly, the need for precise and thorough phenotyping by clinicians, even in the era of genomics, cannot be overemphasized. This review provides an update on recent advances in genetic studies, a suggested approach for the genetic testing of pediatric patients with SRNS.

Unraveling the genetic causes in large pedigrees with gout by whole‑exome sequencing

Gout is a common type of inflammatory arthritis that is clinically and genetically heterogeneous. The genetic aetiology remains unclear, and mainly relies on previous genome-wide association studies focused on sporadic cases. The present study aimed to identify the genetic basis of gout in three families using whole-exome sequencing (WES). WES was performed in the probands, and family members were involved in the co-segregation analysis. In total, three deleterious rare or novel missense mutations were identified in ATP-binding cassette super-family G member 2 (ABCG2), protein kinase CGMP-dependent 2 (PRKG2) and adrenoceptor β3 (ADRB3) genes in three different families. In addition, certain gout-associated candidate genes were revealed to be shared among the co-expression and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks of ABCG2, PRKG2 and ADRB3. Furthermore, the disease ontology analysis of the genes present in the co-expression network exhibited significant (P<0.05) enrichment in hyperuricemia, gout, cardiovascular system disease and metabolic disease. In addition, genes involved in the PPI network were significantly enriched in the purine nucleoside monophosphate biosynthetic process, urate transport and biological processes associated with glycose metabolism. Collectively, to the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to use WES to identify three candidate rare or novel deleterious mutations in three families with gout. The present results provided novel insights that may improve the current understanding of the molecular genetic basis underlying gout. Importantly, the present results may facilitate the improvement of clinical diagnosis and the development of novel personalized therapies.

Problems of Unknown Significance: Counseling in the Era of Next Generation Sequencing

Dear Editor

Next generation sequencing (NGS) has changed the way we approach the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of genetic disorders. It gave us base pair (bp) precision, multi-gene approach that can be executed in a timely and cost-effective manner. Despite some minor technical issues in NGS, it comes with great advantages. However, the clinical, and especially, genetic counseling profession will need to rise to the challenge to face some of the new issues, dilemmas and problems this new technology is bringing to the table. Some of the counseling guidelines predate the NGS era and will urgently need to be brought up to par with the technology.

Detection of copy number variations by pair analysis using next-generation sequencing data in inherited kidney diseases

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive genetic approaches for diagnosing inherited kidney diseases using next-generation sequencing (NGS) have recently been established. However, even with these approaches, we are still failing to detect gene defects in some patients who appear to suffer from genetic diseases. One of the reasons for this is the difficulty of detecting copy number variations (CNVs) using our current approaches. For such cases, we can apply methods of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) or multiplex ligation and probe amplification (MLPA); however, these are expensive and laborious and also often fail to identify CNVs. Here, we report seven cases with CNVs in various inherited kidney diseases screened by NGS pair analysis.

METHODS

Targeted sequencing analysis for causative genes was conducted for cases with suspected inherited kidney diseases, for some of which a definitive genetic diagnosis had not been achieved. We conducted pair analysis using NGS data for those cases. When CNVs were detected by pair analysis, they were confirmed by aCGH and/or MLPA.

RESULTS

In seven cases, CNVs in various causative genes of inherited kidney diseases were detected by pair analysis. With aCGH and/or MLPA, pathogenic CNV variants were confirmed: COL4A5 or HNF1B in two cases each, and EYA1, CLCNKB, or PAX2 in one each.

CONCLUSION

We presented seven cases with CNVs in various genes that were screened by pair analysis. The NGS-based CNV detection method is useful for comprehensive screening of CNVs, and our results revealed that, for a certain proportion of cases, CNV analysis is necessary for accurate genetic diagnosis.