Reliability and Validity of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory Among Japanese Patients

A Hard Truth to Swallow: Critically Evaluating the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) as an Endpoint in Human Papillomavirus-associated Oropharyngeal Cancer Trials

The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), a measure of swallowing-related quality of life, has become the preferred patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in contemporary clinical trials evaluating the experience of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPVOPSCC) survivors. With many potentially practice-changing studies using the MDADI composite score as either a primary or coprimary endpoint, or as a key secondary endpoint, it is important to understand its psychometric properties as judged by contemporary PROM standards, with a particular focus on its application to contemporary HPVOPSCC populations. In this critical review, we evaluate contemporary HPVOPSCC studies reporting MDADI outcomes, followed by a detailed evaluation of the psychometric properties of the MDADI. Although the focus of this review was the MDADI, the issues discussed are not unique to the MDADI and have broader applicability to the evaluation and assessment of other PROMs currently in use. First, it may be possible to improve administration of the instrument, as related to missing items, scoring, and the number of items required. Second, although in many instances, the MDADI has been intended as a direct or surrogate measure of swallowing physiology, the MDADI composite score captures a broader health-related quality of life construct affected by both swallowing and eating, the latter of which may be affected by a range of nonswallowing treatment-related toxicities. Finally, a clinically meaningful change of 10 in the MDADI composite score, widely accepted and applied to the clinical trial setting, represents an undoubtably clinically relevant difference in unselected head and neck cancer survivors. However, the smallest difference that might be clinically important to a highly functional HPVOPSCC cohort remains uncertain. Understanding the purpose and properties of the MDADI instrument and furthering the sophistication with which we apply it in this population would improve its interpretation in clinical trials.

Treatment Complications of Head and Neck Cancers and Rehabilitation Measures: A Narrative Review

Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are malignant tumors mainly from squamous cells in the head and neck tissues. Treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, the long-term prognosis for patients with advanced-stage tumors is guarded, with a median survival time of approximately 24 months. HNC patients have very high rates of depression and anxiety and the highest suicide rate among all cancers due to the intense and challenging nature of the treatment, underscoring the importance of our collective efforts. Rehabilitation success depends on various factors, including tumor, patient, and treatment-related factors. Patients may require post-treatment oral rehabilitation measures, including implants, obturators, and flexible dentures. These measures are crucial, but they often need to be more utilized. Patients may face challenges in maintaining oral hygiene and managing mucositis. Additionally, it is essential to address other intricacies such as trismus, xerostomia, gustatory dysfunctions, neuropathy, speech impairments, and psychological disturbances. Unfortunately, there is little literature on post-treatment rehabilitative measures. Despite its crucial role in improving patients' quality of life, rehabilitation often receives inadequate attention compared to treatment. Our narrative review, which covers various factors that affect rehabilitation, including oral rehabilitation measures and post-treatment complications, is anticipated to deliver practical insights to professionals and inspire positive changes in their regular practice.

Patient-reported outcome measures for dysphagia in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and appraisal of content validity and internal structure

Dysphagia is a major head and neck cancer (HNC) issue. Dysphagia-related patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are critical for patient-centred assessment and intervention tailoring. This systematic review aimed to derive a comprehensive inventory of HNC dysphagia PROMs and appraise their content validity and internal structure. Six electronic databases were searched to February 2023 for studies detailing PROM content validity or internal structure. Eligible PROMs were those developed or validated for HNC, with ≥20% of items related to swallowing. Two independent raters screened citations and full-text articles. Critical appraisal followed COSMIN guidelines. Overall, 114 studies were included, yielding 39 PROMs (17 dysphagia-specific and 22 generic). Of included studies, 33 addressed PROM content validity and 78 internal structure. Of all PROMs, only the SOAL met COSMIN standards for both sufficient content validity and internal structure. Notably, the development of 18 PROMs predated the publication of COSMIN standards. In conclusion, this review identified 39 PROMs addressing dysphagia in HNC, of which only one met COSMIN quality criteria. Given that half of PROMs were developed prior to COSMIN guidelines, future application of current standards is needed to establish their psychometric quality.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Persian Version of the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory

Introduction  Dysphagia is a common issue in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and is known to negatively impact their quality of life. To evaluate the impact of dysphagia on the quality of life of HNC patients, the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire was developed. Objective  The present study aimed to culturally adapt and validate the MDADI for Persian-speaking individuals. The MDADI is a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess the impact of dysphagia on the quality of life of HNC patients. Methods  The original MDADI questionnaire was translated into Persian using the forward-backward method, following the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) for cultural adaptation. The content validity of the Persian version, MDADI-P, was assessed by 10 speech-language pathologists using the content validity index (CVI). Seventy-five HNC patients completed the MDADI-P to evaluate its convergent validity, which was determined by comparing the results with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach α coefficient and intraclass correlation (ICC), respectively. Results  The scale content validity index (S-CVI) for the MDADI-P was 0.90, indicating good content validity. The MDADI-P demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient = 0.728) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91). The total MDADI-P score exhibited a significant correlation with the physical and mental components of the SF-36 (0.456 and 0.349, respectively, p  < 0.05). Conclusion  The findings of the present study confirm the suitability of the MDADI-P in terms of content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.

Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcome measurements in patients with cystinosis

Nephropathic cystinosis is a rare autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder. With the availability of treatment and renal replacement therapy, nephropathic cystinosis has evolved from an early fatal disease to a chronic, progressive disorder with potentially high impairment. We aim to review the literature on the health-related quality of life and identify appropriate patient-reported outcome measurements to assess the health-related quality of life of patients with cystinosis. For this review, we conducted a literature search in PubMed and Web of Science in September 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the selection of articles were defined a priori. We identified 668 unique articles through the search and screened them based on title and abstract. The full texts of 27 articles were assessed. Finally, we included five articles (published between 2009 and 2020) describing the health-related quality of life in patients with cystinosis. All studies, apart from one, were conducted in the United States, and no condition-specific measurement was used. Patients with cystinosis reported a lower health-related quality of life (for certain dimensions) than healthy subjects. Few published studies address the health-related quality of life of patients with cystinosis. Such data must be collected standardized and follow the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of this disorder on health-related quality of life, it is necessary to use generic and condition-specific instruments to measure this, preferably in large samples from longitudinal studies. A cystinosis-specific instrument for measuring health-related quality of life has yet to be developed.

Oral Health Management and Rehabilitation for Patients with Oral Cancer: A Narrative Review

Surgery is the current first choice for oral cancer treatment. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, molecular targeted drugs, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are still used as adjuvant therapy for advanced cancer. In addition, postoperative rehabilitation and multidisciplinary treatment have also been developed in recent years. Multidisciplinary team approaches and supportive care in oral cancer treatment reportedly shorten the time to treatment and improve outcomes. Although there is enough evidence confirming the role of oral and maxillofacial surgeons, dentists, and dental hygienists in supportive care in oral cancer treatment, there are very few systematic studies. In particular, oral health management is a concept that encompasses oral function management, oral hygiene management, and oral care during oral cancer treatment. We provide a narrative review focusing on oral health management from a multidisciplinary and supportive care perspective, applicable in oral cancer treatment.

Discrepancy between subjective and objective postoperative oral dysfunction assessment after oral cancer treatment: A single-center cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

It has been reported that in many cancer types, the evaluation of complications and side effects of treatment differs between subjective and objective evaluations. The purpose of this study is to verify whether the evaluation of postoperative oral dysfunction following oral cancer treatment was consistent subjective and objective evaluations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study collected background data and evaluated the oral function (microorganisms, oral dryness, occlusal force, tongue pressure, masticatory function and eating assessment tool [EAT-10]) of 75 patients from September 2019 to December 2021. The postoperative oral dysfunction-10 (POD-10) was used for the subjective assessment of dysfunction in oral cancer patients. Also, Matsuda-Kanno classification was used for the objective assessment. The kappa coefficient between POD-10 and oral dysfunction was calculated for the degree of agreement. The relationship between oral function measurements and POD-10 was examined by multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

The patients' median age was 72.0 (25-75 percentile: 64.0-78.0) and 69.3% were male. The kappa coefficients indicating the degree of agreement with POD-10 were 0.41 (P < 0.01) for occlusal force, 0.27 (P = 0.01) for masticatory function, and 0.59 (P < 0.01) for EAT-10. Multiple regression analysis showed a significant association of occlusal force (β = -0.33, P = 0.03) and EAT-10 (β = 0.80, P < 0.01) with POD-10.

CONCLUSIONS

For postoperative oral dysfunction type III (occlusal type), the evaluations of subjective and objective evaluations tended to be consistent. However, for type I (transport type) and II (oral hygiene type), these evaluations may be prone to overestimation or underestimation by either the medical professional or the patient.

Validity and Reliability of an Arabic Version of MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

Dysphagia is a common adverse event among head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. We aimed, for the first time, to validate the Arabic version of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) among 82 Saudi Arabian patients with H&N cancer. We followed established validation guidelines and translated the 20-item MDADI using the forward-backward method. Our results revealed 100% feasibility. Test-retest reliability demonstrated acceptable interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the subscale domains (emotional = 0.973, physical = 0.971, and functional = 0.956) and composite score (ICC = 0.984). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the emotional, functional, and physical subscales were 0.937, 0.825, and 0.945, respectively (composite score = 0.975). We confirmed concurrent validity by demonstrating significant correlations between the domains of the Arabic MDADI and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Head and Neck Module (QLQ-H&N35). Our study validated the Arabic version of the MDADI among H&N cancer patients from Saudi Arabia.

Postoperative oral dysfunction following oral cancer resection and reconstruction: A preliminary cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Oral cancer treatment reportedly causes decreased oral function, but few studies have examined the effects of oral cancer treatment on oral function in depth. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the oral function after treatment and classify the conditions related to oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We recruited participants, collected their background data, and evaluated their oral function from September 2019 to March 2021. Principal component analysis was used to identify the components of oral function measurement and oral health perception. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to investigate the accuracy of oral function measurements in predicting oral intake and nutritional status.

RESULTS

Fifty patients treated for oral cancer, including 33 (66.0%) males and 17 (34.0%) females, were included. Their median age was 71.0 years (interquartile range: 63.0-76.0). There were significant differences in oral dryness between males and females, occlusal force among different age groups, tongue pressure based on the tumor stage and performance of reconstructive procedures, and masticatory function and Eating Assessment Tool scores based on whether radiotherapy was performed (P < 0.05). The principal component analysis proposed that oral function measurements and subjective oral health perception could be divided into three main components (transport, oral hygiene, and occlusion type), which explain 61.5% of the variance of the phenomenon.

CONCLUSION

A significant decrease in oral function after oral cancer treatment should be diagnosed as postoperative oral dysfunction. Postoperative oral dysfunction can be classified into three types, each of which may present with different pathologies.

Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Questionnaires for Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life with Dysphagia in Different Countries: A Systematic Review

Dysphagia can have devastating and long-lasting effects on the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In recent years, a number of questionnaires for the evaluation of the HRQoL of patients with dysphagia have been developed and have been adapted for use in different countries and cultures. However, problems may arise in the process of cultural adaptation and validation, which can affect the quality of the questionnaires and their measurements. This study was conducted to systematically summarize the cultural adaptation and validation of questionnaires for the evaluation of dysphagia-related HRQoL in different countries, assessing the varieties, measurement properties, and qualities of these questionnaires, with the aim of identifying the status of their adaptation and validation and ways in which they might be improved. Four databases were searched, and relevant articles were screened, with data from eligible reports extracted and reviewed. The methodological quality of the included articles was evaluated using the QualSyst critical appraisal tool. The HRQoL questionnaires for patients with dysphagia were assessed using the quality criteria for the measurement properties of health status questionnaires proposed by Terwee et al. and Timmerman et al. 29 studies published between 2008 and 2020 were included. The questionnaires described in these 29 studies were translated into 19 languages and culturally adapted to 21 countries. The adapted questionnaires were based on the Swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) by Mchorney et al., the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) by Silbergleit et al., the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) by Chen et al., and the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) by Belafsky et al. It was found that the questionnaires were reliable and valid instruments for the assessment of dysphagia-related HRQoL, but the quality criteria for cultural adaptation and validation were not strictly followed, especially in the categories of criterion validity, agreement, responsiveness, and interpretability. In conclusion, although the questionnaires were found to be both reliable and valid, the quality criteria should be considered and strictly followed in the cultural adaptation and validation process in the future.

Impact of rehabilitation treatment on swallowing during adjuvant radiotherapy following surgery in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced oral or oropharyngeal cancer sometimes require surgery and adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy (PORT), which may cause dysphagia. However, the efficacy of rehabilitation treatment for PORT-induced dysphagia remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether rehabilitation treatment during PORT after surgery is effective for dysphagia.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 55 patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer who received PORT. Of these, 25 received rehabilitation treatment for swallowing during PORT. The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) score at 6 months after treatment was used as the swallowing outcome. We performed multivariate linear regression and stratified analyses using the FOIS score (poor oral intake group: FOIS score <5, good oral intake group: FOIS score ≧5) before PORT.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) FOIS scores at 6 months post-PORT were 6 (5-6) and 6 (4-7) in the non-rehabilitation and rehabilitation groups, respectively. Multivariate linear regression revealed that rehabilitation treatment was a significant independent factor for a better FOIS score. Stratified analysis of the changes in the FOIS score from pre-PORT values to those obtained 6 months after treatment showed a significant difference in the good oral intake group between the rehabilitation and non-rehabilitation groups. There was no significant difference in the FOIS score from pre-PORT values to those obtained 6 months after treatment between the rehabilitation and non-rehabilitation groups in the poor oral intake group.

CONCLUSION

Rehabilitation treatment during PORT may achieve better swallowing outcomes in patients with advanced oral or oropharyngeal cancer.

The presence of dysphagia in patients with cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS): a subjective and objective study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of dysphagia in patients with cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS), characterizing this condition, both in its objective dimension and in terms of quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was developed in 11 patients diagnosed of CANVAS. In all patients, clinical records were reviewed and the Eating assessment tool 10 (EAT-10) was performed as screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia. To evaluate the QoL impairment secondary to dysphagia, we applied the swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). To evaluate the deglutition mechanisms impaired, two objective-instrumental studies were performed: the volume-viscosity swallow test (V-VST) and the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).

RESULTS

82% of the patients presented an abnormal EAT-10 score. A correlation was found between the EAT-10 and MDADI and between both QoL questionnaires. After the FEES and V-VST analysis, all 11 patients presented some degree of swallow effectiveness impairment, and most of them safety alterations as well.

CONCLUSION

CANVAS remains an underestimated and underdiagnosed condition and the prevalence of swallowing disorders in those patients is higher than expected. Despite the possibility that EAT-10 works as a useful screening test to predict the results in the QoL questionnaires, the absence of correlation between QoL test and instrumental results suggests that to properly evaluate the patients swallowing status, objective instrumental procedures must be conducted.

Relationship between the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and the Self-Efficacy Scale among Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

A few studies have provided detailed reports suggesting that subjective swallowing disorders may be related to dysphagia. Therefore, we verified the relationship between oral health-related self-efficacy and dysphagia severity in cancer treatment using a cross-sectional study. Participants included patients undergoing treatment for cancer at Shimane University Hospital in Shimane, Japan, and those receiving outpatient treatment at the hospital's Oral Care Center between August 2018 and April 2019. In all, 203 participants enrolled in the study and completed the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), the Self-efficacy Scale for Advanced Cancer (SEAC), and the Oral Health-related Self-Efficacy Scale for Patients with Cancer (OSEC). Multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between the low FOIS score and the SEAC subscales of Activities of Daily Living Self-efficacy (ADE) (odds ratio 1.04, 95% [CI] 1.00-1.07) and Symptom Coping Self-efficacy (SCE) (odds ratio 0.61, 95% [CI] 0.42-0.88). Based on the Jonckheere-Terpstra test, the SEAC and the OSEC tended to increase as the category of the FOIS progressed. To conclude, self-efficacy played an important role in dysphagia and may affect the severity of dysphagia in cancer patients.

Validity and reliability of a French version of M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory

OBJECTIVE

To assess the internal consistency, reliability, and clinical validity of a French version of the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (Fr-MDADI).

METHODS

Patients addressed in the Swallowing Clinics of CHU Saint-Pierre Hospital (Brussels) and EpiCURA hospital (Ath, Belgium) for dysphagia completed Fr-MDADI, eating assessment tool-10 (EAT-10), dysphagia handicap index (DHI), and benefited from fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopy. Seventy-two asymptomatic individuals composed the control group. The reliability of Fr-MDADI was assessed through a test-retest procedure. The validity was assessed by comparing Fr-MDADI with EAT-10 scores. Normative value of Fr-MDADI was calculated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients and 77 healthy individuals completed the evaluations (33 males). The main etiology of dysphagia was head and neck cancers. The internal consistency was high regarding the Cronbach's alpha (0.864). The test-retest reliability was high for Fr-MDADI total scores (r_s = 0.849). The Fr-MDADI emotional, functional and physical subscores, and the total score exhibited high positive correlations with EAT-10 (r_s = 0.770) and DHI (r_s = 0.811), exhibiting high external validity. Patients had significant higher item and total score of Fr-MDADI compared with healthy individuals (control group), which indicated an adequate internal validity. About normative data, a Fr-MDADI > 13 was considered to be reflective of abnormalities. The 'swallowing-induced cough' item of the Fr-MDADI was significantly associated with the occurrence of aspirations regarding objective examinations (FEES or videofluoroscopy; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Fr-MDADI is a reliable and valid self-administered tool in the evaluation of the dysphagia of French-speaking patients.

Validation of the Dutch Version of the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory for Neurogenic Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch-language version of the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) for patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD).

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-eight patients with neurogenic OD and 92 healthy control subjects completed the MDADI and the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL-NL). Exclusion criteria were: suffering from a concurrent head-and-neck oncological disease, scoring below 23 on a Mini Mental State Examination, being older than 85 years, and being illiterate or blind. None of the patients was in a palliative state of disease. Floor and ceiling effects, known-groups validity, internal consistency, construct validity, and criterion validity were assessed.

RESULTS

The MDADI total score showed no floor or ceiling effects for the patient group. Known-groups validity was confirmed by group differences in score distributions between patients and healthy control subjects. The internal consistency showed Cronbach's α-values ranging from 0.77 to 0.92. Correlations between the MDADI subscales and SWAL-QOL-NL domains were moderate to strong: 0.71, 0.70, and 0.62 (convergent construct validity). Correlations between the MDADI scores and the SWAL-QOL-NL domains general burden, food selection, eating duration, communication, mental health, social functioning, and frequency of symptoms were moderate to strong, ranging from 0.41 to 0.75. Weak correlations (<0.4) were found between the MDADI scores and the SWAL-QOL-NL domains eating desire, sleep, and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that the Dutch translation of the MDADI is a psychometrically validated and suitable dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with neurogenic OD.