Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Functional Chewing Training Compared with Standard Treatment in a Population of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Functional Chewing Training (FuCT) was designed as a holistic approach to improve chewing function by providing postural alignment, sensory and motor training, and food and environmental adjustments. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of FuCT in improving chewing function and the severity of tongue thrust and drooling in children with cerebral palsy as compared with standard treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. The search was performed between October 2021 and January 2022 using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL. The review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 56 articles. After reading the studies in full, 3 articles were chosen based on the inclusion criteria. Included participants were people with PCI; the studies reported a sample size ranging from 40-80 individuals, one study was on a pediatric population, while the others on adults. The selected studies were then evaluated using Jadad and PEDro scales.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the value of FuCT in improving chewing function and the severity of tongue thrust and drooling. Our results may be useful in optimizing appropriate therapeutic management.

A study of validity and reliability for Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment in outpatient children with cerebral palsy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the reproducibility, stability, internal consistency and the ability to grade malnutrition of Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA) in outpatient children with cerebral palsy.

METHODS

This was a part of a larger, cross-sectional study (ChiCTR2000033869) at the outpatient of a tertiary hospital. The recruitment and data collection of children with Cerebral Palsy aged from 1 to 18 years were from August 2020 to March 2021. The concurrent validity, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of SGNA were tested. To analyze data, specificity, sensitivity, Kendall coefficient, Cohen's kappa coefficient, Spearman coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficient were used.

RESULTS

The agreement between SGNA and anthropometric data was moderate to strong (k = 0.540-0.821). The sensitivity (71.70% to 89.74%) and specificity (77.67% to 91.03%) of SGNA to identify participants with z-score ≤-2 were good. The sensitivity of SGNA to identify participants with weight for age z-score ≤-3 was poor (30.00%). The interrater reliability (k = 0.703) and test-retest reliability (k = 0.779) were good. The item of edema was with poor agreement to SGNA nutritional grades (r_s = 0.072), and after deleting it from SGNA, the Cronbach's α coefficient of SGNA increased from 0.736 to 0.871.

FINDINGS

SGNA is good at identifying malnourished outpatient children with cerebral palsy, with excellent reproducibility and short-time stability. However, the ability to grade malnutrition is unsatisfactory. For further application in this group, a more appropriate item should be designed to replace the item of edema.

Reliability and Validity of the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System in Adults with Cerebral Palsy

The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS) was developed to evaluate dysphagia in children with cerebral palsy (CP). This study aimed to investigate the interrater reliability and validity of the EDACS in adults with CP. This cross-sectional study included 117 community-dwelling adults (mean age, 37.9 ± 12.5 years) with a confirmed CP diagnosis. A swallowing occupational therapist (SwOT) conducted detailed interviews with participants and/or caregivers to classify the EDACS. Another SwOT and participants/caregivers evaluated the EDACS. Correlations were evaluated between the EDACS and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL), Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). Interrater reliabilities between SwOTs (κ = 0.866, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.867), and between SwOT and participant/caregiver (κ = 0.884, ICC = 0.717) were reported. The EDACS correlated with the FOIS, SWAL-QOL, and MACS, although no significant correlation was found with the GMFCS. The EDACS of spastic-type showed better correlation than that of dyskinetic-type with the FOIS, MACS, and GMFCS. There was a significant correlation between the EDACS and the GMFCS in those aged ≤ 30 years, whereas there was no correlation in those aged ≥ 30 years. The EDACS is a reliable and valid tool for classifying eating and drinking ability in adults with CP. The correlation between the EDACS with gait or hand function was more prominent in individuals with spastic CP and in younger individuals. The EDACS is a valuable adjunct to comprehensive functional classification in adults with CP.