Whiplash-Associated Dysphagia and Dysphonia: A Scoping Review

A Systematic Review of Interventions for Late Talkers: Intervention Approaches, Elements, and Vocabulary Outcomes

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to examine the empirical evidence on interventions for late talkers between 18 and 42 months according to type of intervention approach (direct, indirect, and hybrid), reporting of intervention elements, and outcomes for receptive and expressive vocabulary.

METHOD

This review was registered with PROSPERO and followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Eleven databases were systematically searched with 34 intervention studies involving 1,207 participants meeting criteria. Studies were categorized as using a direct, indirect, or hybrid intervention approach, then examined according to intervention elements, vocabulary outcomes, as well as reported tools and type of score used to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

Across 34 studies, nine used a direct intervention approach, 10 an indirect intervention approach, and 14 a hybrid intervention approach. One study compared direct and hybrid intervention approaches. All indirect and hybrid approaches included parent training; direct approaches did not. The type and degree of reporting of other intervention elements, as well as the tools and type of score used to evaluate outcomes, varied within and across approaches. Overall, improvements in expressive vocabulary were reported by 93% of studies, with variable results for the nine studies reporting receptive vocabulary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The direct, indirect, and hybrid intervention approaches were typified by specific intervention elements; however, there was diversity in how other elements comprising the approaches were arranged. When making decisions about which intervention approach to use, clinicians need to be mindful of the differences among approaches, how they discuss those differences with parents, and which approaches and elements might be best suited to individual children and their families.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21291405.

Shape modelling of the oropharynx distinguishes associations with body morphology but not whiplash-associated disorder

Characterization of the oropharynx, a subdivision of the pharynx between the soft palate and the epiglottis, is limited to simple measurements. Structural changes in the oropharynx in whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) cohorts have been quantified using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) measures but the results are inconsistent. Statistical shape modelling (SSM) may be a more useful tool for systematically comparing morphometric features between cohorts. This technique has been used to quantify the variability in boney and soft tissue structures, but has not been used to examine a hollow cavity such as the oropharynx. The primary aim of this project was to examine the utility of SSM for comparing the oropharynx between WAD cohorts and control; and WAD severity cohorts. The secondary aim was to determine whether shape is associated with sex, height, weight and neck length. Magnetic resonance (MR) T1-weighted images were obtained from healthy control (n = 20), acute WAD (n = 14) and chronic WAD (n = 14) participants aged 18-39 years. Demographic, WAD severity (neck disability index) and body morphometry data were collected from each participant. Manual segmentation of the oropharynx was undertaken by blinded researchers between the top of the soft palate and tip of the epiglottis. Digital 3D oropharynx models were constructed from the segmented images and principal component (PC) analysis was performed with the PC weights normalized to z-scores for consistency. Statistical analyses were undertaken using multivariate linear models. In the first statistical model the independent variable was group (acute WAD, chronic WAD, control); and in the second model the independent variable was WAD severity (recovered/mild, moderate/severe). The covariates for both models included height, weight, average neck length and sex. Shape models were constructed to visualize the effect of perturbing these covariates for each relevant mode. The shape model revealed five modes which explained 90% of the variance: mode 1 explained 59% of the variance and primarily described differences in isometric size of the oropharynx, including elongation; mode 2 (13%) primarily described lateral (width) and AP (depth) dimensions; mode 3 (8%) described retroglossal AP dimension; mode 4 (6%) described lateral dimensions at the retropalatal-retroglossal junction and mode 5 (4%) described the lateral dimension at the inferior retroglossal region. There was no difference in shape (mode 1 p = 0.52; mode 2 p = 0.96; mode 3 p = 0.07; mode 4 p = 0.54; mode 5 p = 0.74) between control, acute WAD and chronic WAD groups. There were no statistical differences for any mode (mode 1 p = 0.12; mode 2 p = 0.29; mode 3 p = 0.56; mode 4 p = 0.99; mode 5 p = 0.96) between recovered/mild and moderate/severe WAD. Sex was not significant in any of the models but for mode 1 there was a significant association with height (p = 0.007), mode 2 neck length (p = 0.044) and in mode 3 weight (p = 0.027). Although SSM did not detect differences between WAD cohorts, it did detect associations with body morphology indicating that it may be a useful tool for examining differences in the oropharynx.

Features and impact of dysphagia, dysphonia and laryngeal hypersensitivity in whiplash associated disorder - a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Investigation into dysphagia, dysphonia and laryngeal hypersensitivity after whiplash is limited, offering minimal insight into specific features and impact. This study aimed to explore these symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A qualitative interpretive description design was used. Eleven participants with chronic Whiplash Associated Disorder and self-reported swallowing, voice and/or throat-related problems completed baseline symptom questionnaires and were offered a videofluroscopic swallow study to investigate baseline swallowing biomechanics. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore features of swallowing, voice and laryngeal sensory complaints and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

There were high baseline levels of self-reported neck, pain- and throat-related disability and psychological distress. There was no evidence of baseline deficits in swallow biomechanics. Thematic analysis revealed 5 themes: (1) A range of features of dysphagia and dysphonia exist after whiplash with varied clinical course; (2) Activity and participation in swallow and voice activities have changed; (3) There are psychological and emotional impacts; (4) Features of laryngeal hypersensitivity co-exist and (5) There are barriers to management.

CONCLUSIONS

Swallow, voice and laryngeal sensory problems after whiplash were described, with impacts on quality of life and barriers to management. These insights broaden understanding of post-whiplash sequalae, indicating the need for better detection.Implications for rehabilitationDysphagia, dysphonia and laryngeal hypersensitivity are under-recognised consequences of whiplash.Individuals presenting with dysphagia, dysphonia and laryngeal sensory symptoms after whiplash experience significant implications to wellbeing, activity and participation.Improved understanding of these symptoms may facilitate better detection and subsequent referral to speech-language pathology.Greater understanding into the functional and psychosocial implications of these symptoms may guide more effective post-whiplash assessments and informed rehabilitation.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Sarcopenic Dysphagia: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenic dysphagia is a swallowing disorder due to sarcopenia involving the whole-body skeletal muscles and swallowing muscles. This scoping review aimed to explore the currently known information on the diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenic dysphagia and to clarify the types of research required to develop the field.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from their inception to October 2020, using the search terms "(sarcopenia or sarcopenic or myopenia or dynapenia) and (dysphagia or swallowing or deglutition) and (diagnosis or treatment)". Articles reporting diagnosis method and treatment of sarcopenic dysphagia were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-one and eight articles reported on the diagnostic and treatment method, respectively. A diagnostic algorithm for sarcopenic dysphagia was most frequently used (n = 10). Other diagnostic methods included consensus diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic dysphagia (n = 4), sarcopenia and dysphagia without other causes of dysphagia (n = 4), and both sarcopenia and dysphagia (n = 3). The medical treatments for patients with sarcopenic dysphagia were described in single-patient case reports (n = 8) only. There were six articles reporting on a combination of rehabilitation and nutritional support. These reports showed the importance of interdisciplinary rehabilitation nutrition for improving patients' nutritional status and sarcopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

A reliable and validated diagnostic algorithm was the most widely used diagnostic method for sarcopenic dysphagia. Only case reports have been published for the medical treatment of patients with sarcopenic dysphagia. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation nutrition may be useful for treating patients with sarcopenic dysphagia.