The Impact of Periventricular Leukoaraiosis in Post-stroke Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Swallowing Biomechanics and MRI-Based Study

Swallowing and Aspiration: How to Evaluate and Treat Swallowing Disorders Associated with Aspiration Pneumonia in Older Persons

Aspiration pneumonia (AP) is the most severe complication of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). It is highly underdiagnosed and undertreated among older patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Our aim is to review the state of the art in the diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders associated with AP. We performed a narrative review, including our experience with prior studies at Hospital de Mataró, on the diagnosis and treatment of AP. AP refers to pneumonia occurring in patients with swallowing disorders, frequently coinciding with poor oral health and vulnerability. Its main risk factors include oropharyngeal aspiration, impaired health status, malnutrition, frailty, immune dysfunction, and oral colonization by respiratory pathogens. Incidence is estimated at between 5 and 15% of cases of CAP, but it is highly underdiagnosed. Diagnostic criteria for AP have not been standardized but should include its main pathophysiological element, oropharyngeal aspiration. Recently, a clinical algorithm was proposed, based on the recommendations of the Japanese Respiratory Society, that includes aspiration risk factors and clinical evaluation of OD. To facilitate the task for health care professionals, new artificial intelligence (AI)-based screening tools for OD combined with validated clinical methods such as the volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST) for the detection of AP are being validated. Prevention and treatment of AP require multimodal interventions aimed to cover the main risk factors: textural adaptation of fluids and diets to avoid oropharyngeal aspiration; nutritional support to avoid malnutrition; and oral hygiene to reduce oral bacterial load. The diagnosis of AP must be based on standardized criteria providing evidence on the main etiological factor, oropharyngeal aspiration. Clinical algorithms are valid in the diagnosis of AP and the identification of its main risk factors. Combination of AI-based tools with V-VST can lead to massive screening of OD and save resources and improve efficiency in the detection of AP.

Cerebral small vessel disease is an independent determinant of dysphagia after acute stroke

BACKGROUND

The high incidence of dysphagia after acute stroke is likely the result of cumulative effects of the stroke and pre-stroke brain health. While cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is recognized as a marker of compromised brain health, it's unclear which neuroanatomical pathologies of cSVD impact post-stroke dysphagia. We assessed the relation between cSVD pathologies, i.e., brain atrophy, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), perivascular spaces, as markers for brain integrity at the time of the stroke, and acute post-stroke dysphagia measured with the Modified Barium Swallow Study (MBSS).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational study of 40 individuals with an acute first-ever ischemic stroke. We segmented T1-weighted images into gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to derive brain atrophy estimates. We scored the presence and severity of periventricular and deep WMH using the Fazekas scale and counted perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia following standard guidelines. Swallow impairments were determined with the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP), Penetration-Aspiration Scale, and timing measures (oral (OTT), and pharyngeal transit times (PTT)). We performed regression to assess the relation between cSVD pathologies and swallowing while controlling for the stroke overlap with the right and left corticobulbar tracts, stroke volume, and the number of days between the MRI and MBSS.

RESULTS

Worse brain atrophy and more severe periventricular WMH were related to more severe MBSImP pharyngeal total scores, and worse deep WMH were related to aspiration events. More severe perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia were related to longer OTT and PTT, with a high explanatory value (27.5% and 25.1%, respectively), even when controlling for chronological age.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that several aspects of pre-stroke brain health impact dysphagia severity after acute stroke independent of the stroke site and size. These findings contribute to our understanding of mechanisms underlying the variability of post-stroke dysphagia and emphasize the importance of brain structural integrity before the stroke. Future larger studies are warranted.

Neurophysiological characterization of oropharyngeal dysphagia in older patients

OBJECTIVE

To characterize swallowing biomechanics and neurophysiology in older patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD).

METHODS

Observational study in 12 young healthy volunteers (HV), 9 older HV (OHV) and 12 older patients with OD with no previous diseases causing OD (OOD). Swallowing biomechanics were measured by videofluoroscopy, neurophysiology with pharyngeal sensory (pSEP) and motor evoked-potentials (pMEP) to intrapharyngeal electrical and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), respectively, and salivary neuropeptides with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

83.3% of OOD patients had unsafe swallows (Penetration-Aspiration scale = 4.3 ± 2.1; p < 0.0001) with delayed time to laryngeal vestibule closure (362.5 ± 73.3 ms; p < 0.0001) compared to both HV groups. OOD patients had: (a) higher pharyngeal sensory threshold (p = 0.009) and delayed pSEP P1 and N2 latencies (p < 0.05 vs HV) to electrical stimulus; and (b) higher pharyngeal motor thresholds to TMS in both hemispheres (p < 0.05) and delayed pMEPs latencies (right, p < 0.0001 HV vs OHV/OOD; left, p < 0.0001 HV vs OHV/OOD).

CONCLUSIONS

OOD patients have unsafe swallow and delayed swallowing biomechanics, pharyngeal hypoesthesia with disrupted conduction of pharyngeal sensory inputs, and reduced excitability and delayed cortical motor response.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings suggest new elements in the pathophysiology of aging-associated OD and herald new and more specific neurorehabilitation treatments for these patients.

Comparing biomechanics and neurophysiology between different phenotypes of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia

The pathophysiology of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) across patient phenotypes may differ. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanics and neurophysiology of swallowing between healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients with dysphagia as a consequence of aging (OOD), post-stroke (PSOD), Parkinson's disease (POD), or dementia (DOD). A retrospective study including 35 HVs and 109 OOD, 195 PSOD, 78 POD, and 143 DOD patients was performed. Videofluoroscopic data of signs of impaired efficacy and safety, penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) score, and the biomechanics of laryngeal vestibule closure (LVC) and opening (LVO) and of upper esophageal sphincter opening (UESO) were collected. Neurophysiology was assessed with pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials and neurotopography maps. All OD phenotypes showed signs of impaired efficacy and safety of swallowing, increased PAS score (p < 0.001), and delayed time to LVC (p < 0.0001). OOD (p < 0.0001), PSOD (p < 0.0001), and POD (p = 0.0065) patients also had delayed time to LVO, and OOD (p = 0.0062) and DOD (p = 0.0016) patients to UESO. Regarding neurophysiology, all phenotypes presented impaired pharyngeal sensitivity, a significant reduction in cortical activation, and impaired sensory input integration. Additionally, only PSOD was associated with impaired conduction of sensory stimuli. In conclusion, we found common but also specific pathophysiological elements. These results improve our understanding of OD pathophysiology and may help pave the way for phenotype-specific treatments.