Laparoscopic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy: our experience of 17 cases

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy and modified Frey's procedure for patients of chronic pancreatitis: A 10-year experience

INTRODUCTION

To mitigate the morbidity associated with open procedures for chronic pancreatitis (CP), there is a paradigm shift towards the laparoscopic approach. However, since these procedures are technically demanding, literature is still limited. We present our experience and long-term outcomes in the management of CP with laparoscopic surgical procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent a laparoscopic surgery for CP between 2009 and 2019. Pain scores using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were compared pre- and postoperatively. In patients with diabetes, the pre- and post-operative insulin requirement was compared.

RESULTS

Data of 62 patients were analysed. The mean duration of follow-up was 69 (±22) months. All patients had pain relief post-surgery. The relief of pain was sustained, with the median VAS scores being 1 at 3- and 5-year follow-up. There was a decrease in the median insulin requirement of diabetic patients, which was significant at 3-month and 1-year follow-up ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that laparoscopic surgical procedures offer long-term pain control with low morbidity. Effective ductal decompression may result in a short-term improvement of the endocrine function of the gland.

Changing trends in the minimally invasive surgery for chronic pancreatitis

Chronic pancreatitis is a debilitating pancreatic inflammatory disease characterized by intractable pain resulting in poor quality of life. Conventional management of pancreatic pain consists of a step-up approach with medications and lifestyle modifications followed by endoscopic intervention. Traditionally surgery is reserved for patients who do not improve with other interventions. However, recent studies suggest that early surgical intervention is more beneficial as it can mitigate the progression of the pathological process and prevent loss of pancreatic function. Despite the widespread adoption of minimally invasive approaches in various gastrointestinal surgical disorders, minimally invasive surgery for chronic pancreatitis is slow to evolve. Technical difficulty due to severe inflammatory changes has been the major impediment to the widespread usage of minimally invasive surgery in chronic pancreatitis. With this background, the present review aimed to critically analyze the available evidence on the minimally invasive treatment of chronic pancreatitis. A Pub Med search of all relevant articles was performed using the appropriate keywords, parentheses, and Boolean operators. Most initial laparoscopic series have reported the feasibility of lateral pancreaticojejunostomy, considered an adequate procedure only in a small proportion of patients. The pancreatic head is the pacemaker of pain, so adequate decompression is critical for long-term pain relief. Recent studies have documented the feasibility of minimally invasive duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. With improvements in laparoscopic instrumentation and technological advances, minimally invasive surgery for chronic pancreatitis is gaining momentum. However, more high-quality evidence is required to document the superiority of minimally invasive surgery for chronic pancreatitis.

‘Short’ pancreaticojejunostomy might be a valid option for treatment of chronic pancreatitis in many cases

BACKGROUND

The Partington-Rochelle pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is an essential management option for patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) associated with intractable pain and a dilated pancreatic duct (PD). Wide ductotomy and long PJ (L-PJ) have been advocated as the standard of care to ensure full PD decompression. However, the role of short PJ (S-PJ) in a uniformly dilated PD has not yet been evaluated.

AIM

To evaluate the possible advantages and disadvantages of S-PJ and L-PJ and to interpret the perspective of S-PJ in the treatment of CP.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected cohort data was conducted on surgically treated CP patients subjected to side-to-side PJ. The length of the PJ was adapted to anatomical alterations in PD. A comparison was made of S-PJ (< 50 mm) for uniformly dilated PD and L-PJ (50-100 mm) in the setting of multiple PD strictures, calcifications and dilatations. We hypothesized that S-PJ and L-PJ ensure comparable clinical outcomes. The primary outcomes were pain relief and quality of life (QOL); the secondary outcomes were perioperative characteristics, body weight, patients’ satisfaction with treatment, and readmission rate due to CP.

RESULTS

Overall, 91 patients underwent side-to-side PJ for CP, including S-PJ in 46 patients and L-PJ in 45 patients. S-PJ resulted in better perioperative outcomes: Significantly shorter operative time (107.5 min vs 134 min), lower need for intraoperative (0% vs 15.6%) and total (2.2% vs 31.1%) blood transfusions, and lower rate of perioperative complications (6.5% vs 17.8%). We noted no significant difference in pain relief, improvement in QOL, body weight gain, patients’ satisfaction with surgical treatment, or readmission rate due to CP.

CONCLUSION

Based on our data, in the setting of a uniformly dilated PD, S-PJ provides adequate decompression of the PD. As the clinical outcomes following S-PJ are not inferior to those of L-PJ, S-PJ should be preferred as a surgical option in the case of a uniformly dilated PD.

Laparoscopic longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis: Systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy, also known as modified Puestow or Partington-Rochelle procedure, is a technique for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. It is usually performed by laparotomy, but in a very small number of cases it has been performed using a laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach. We carried out a systematic literature review to clarify the current status of laparoscopic longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy (LLPJ).

METHODS

Adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search for LLPJ was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for articles published up to 31 December 2017.

RESULTS

357 articles were evaluated for eligibility and 17 were included for critical appraisal: eight case reports, eight retrospective case series, and one series of cases and controls without randomization. All of them had a grade of recommendation C and a level of evidence 4 according to the CEBM. Patients were relatively young (mean age 37 years), with a slight preponderance of males (ratio 1.3: 1). All had long-standing disease, ERCP prior to surgery and a dilated pancreatic duct (mean 11 mm). The surgery was usually performed laparoscopically using four trocars; the conversion rate was low (5%), bleeding was minimal, the morbidity rate was 11% and no mortality was reported. Mean hospital stay was 5.6 days. The follow-up period varied but was usually short (less than two years). The results for pain control were very good since 90% of patients reported no pain, although visual analog scales were rarely used.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, LLPJ seems to be a safe, feasible and effective technique in patients with chronic pancreatitis. However, the number of descriptions published to date is very small, and there are no studies with high scientific evidence comparing LLPJ with open surgery or with endoscopic treatment that would allow us to draw firmer conclusions at the present time.

Laparoscopic longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy and modified Frey's operation for chronic calcific pancreatitis

Background

Chronic pancreatitis is a debilitating disease presenting with pain, diabetes and steatorrhoea. Surgery offers better long-term pain relief than other interventions, but there is still uncertainty about the optimal surgical procedure and approach and a lack of long-term follow-up data in patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis selected for laparoscopic surgical treatment.

Methods

This was an observational cohort study of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for chronic calcific pancreatitis between January 2006 and April 2017, and had completed a minimum follow-up of 1 year at a tertiary-care teaching institute. Eligibility for the laparoscopic approach was main duct diameter greater than 7 mm, absence of extensive head calcification, size of head less than 3·5 cm, absence of local complications, and ASA grade I or II status. The primary outcome variable was a reduction in pain score by 1 year. Secondary outcomes were hospital stay, complications, pain score at 3 and 5 years, and the development or progression of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency.

Results

Some 57 patients were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic surgery for chronic pancreatitis: longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy (39), modified Frey's procedure (15) and pancreatoduodenectomy for suspicion of malignancy (3). The latter three patients were excluded from the analysis. Conversion to open surgery was needed in ten of the 57 patients (18 per cent). The mean(s.d.) age of the analysed cohort was 34·2(3·7) years and there was a predominance of men (34, 63 per cent). Adequate pain relief was achieved in 91, 89 and 88 per cent of patients at 1, 3 and 5 years of follow-up respectively.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgical management of chronic calcific pancreatitis with longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy or modified Frey's procedure is feasible, safe and effective in selected patients for the relief of pain.

Negotiating the Curve of Laparoscopic Hepatopancreaticobiliary Procedures (Basic to Advanced) at a Tertiary Rural Teaching Institute

Background:

We present here our experience of laparoscopic hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgeries at our rural institute and the hurdles we faced overcoming the various challenges.

Aims and Objectives:

The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility, successful completion, operative time, conversions/requirement of assistance, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications on the HPB procedures performed laparoscopically in our surgical unit; and to help young surgeons for smooth navigation through their laparoscopic career.

Materials and Methods:

All the patients admitted under our unit over the past 9 years for elective HPB surgeries operated by a single surgeon were included in this study.

Results:

Total 1304 basic laparoscopic biliary procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically. After getting well versed with the standard procedure, we switched over to difficult cases involving densely adhered gallbladder, frozen Calot's, Mirizzi's syndrome, use of intraoperative cholangiogram, and take down of cholecystoduodenal fistulas. Next step in evolution was doing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and biliary procedures with decreased number of ports. Five hundred and sixty-eight procedures were advanced HPB surgeries. With time, we also started performing a variety of complex advanced laparoscopic procedures such as cystogastrostomy, hepaticojejunostomy, choledochoduodenostomy, and pancreaticojejunostomy. All these procedures have been discussed with respect to operative duration, conversion rates, blood loss, hospital stay, and complication rates in the initial and later parts of the learning curves and further compared with previous standard large case studies on specific surgeries.

Conclusion:

Several hurdles are met in a new institute, that too, a rural one. The present discussion will help the budding surgeons to identify their deficiencies and chart a way forward in a systematic scientific manner.

Laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision and stone removal and T-type tube drainage for pancreatic duct stone: A case report and review of literature

To study a more micro-invasive procedure for patients having pancreatic duct stones (PDS). Till now, there has been no report of laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision and stone removal and T-type tube drainage for PDS in the English literature. An 82-year-old man suffered from subxiphoid pain associated with a dilated pancreatic duct (7 mm) containing one stone, but without a mass in the head of the pancreas. Laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision, stone removal, and T-type tube drainage were successfully performed without intraoperative or postoperative complications. An uneventful operation was performed with laparoscopically completed procedures in 160 min. The intraoperative loss of blood was around 50 mL. After patient a discharge on day 11, complete relief from the subxiphoid pain was reported at a follow-up visit 15 mo later. Laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision with stone removal and T-type tube drainage is applicable in carefully selected patients and can be effectively and safely used for the treatment of the abdominal pain of chronic pancreatitis.

Laparoscopic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy: an evolution to endostapled technique

BACKGROUND

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a debilitating condition resulting in severe pain with progressive deterioration of pancreatic function. "Tropical" pancreatitis represents a variant of the disease with widely dilated ducts, numerous calculi, and few strictures. Traditionally, modified Puestow's procedure has been the treatment of choice for a dilated pancreatic ductal system. However, it has only recently been adapted to laparoscopic approach which is a technically demanding procedure primarily due to need for extensive intra-corporeal suturing.

METHODS

Symptomatic cases of CP presenting at our center with minimum 8 mm mean ductal diameter at body and head were selected for laparoscopic modified Puestow's procedure. Those with prior pancreatic surgery, pancreatic head masses, endoscopic pancreatic stenting, and portal hypertension were excluded. Twenty-eight cases meeting selection criteria underwent a laparoscopic procedure.

RESULTS

Seven patients (25%) underwent a stapled pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, 17 (60.7%) received a sutured anastomosis. Four patients (14.3%) were converted to open surgery due to failure to localize the pancreatic duct with percutaneous needle aspiration. Of those patients who underwent a successful laparoscopic procedure, a single patient developed a pancreatic fistula which resolved spontaneously; another patient had a difficult post-operative course with prolonged intensive care. We suffered no mortality within the series and no patient had any long-term disability. Anastomotic patency rates of 100% were achieved by the third post-operative month.

CONCLUSION

Lateral pancreaticojejunostomy is an effective surgical management for CP with a dilated ductal system. Its laparoscopic adoption is the rational next surgical step. It allows effective duct decompression with low mortality and morbidity. The procedure demands an advanced surgical skill set with an emphasis on intra-corporeal suturing. Those patients suffering from tropical CP with wide ductal dilatation greater than 12 mm are suited to an endostapled anastomosis which helps significantly reduce operative time without any corrosion of outcomes.

[Laparoscopic pancreatic head resection]

AIM

To analyze the features and efficacy of laparoscopic Frey procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For the period from August 2012 to May 2017 Frey procedure was carried out in 31 patients with chronic calculous pancreatitis Buchler type C. There were 20 men and 11 women aged 48.6±9 years. Mean pancreatic head dimension was 35.5±14 mm, diameter of the main pancreatic duct - 9.6±2.7 mm.

RESULTS

Completely laparoscopic procedure was made in 28 (90.3%) cases. One patient required intraoperatively Beger's technique without conversion. The last was need in 2 (6.5%) cases. Time of surgery and blood loss were 447.3±90.4 min and 215±177.7 ml respectively. Mean postoperative hospital-stay was 8.4±4.5 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 patients. Mortality was absent. Follow-up was 1-41 months. Recurrent pain syndrome was observed in 1 case. However, it was less severe and does not require analgesia.

Safety and feasibility of the robotic platform in the management of surgical sequelae of chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND/AIM

The application of minimally invasive surgery to chronic pancreatitis (CP) procedures is uncommon. Our objective was to report the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach in the treatment of surgical sequelae of CP, and provide insights into the technique, tricks, and pitfalls associated with the application of robotics to this challenging disease entity.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing robotic-assisted resections and/or drainage procedures for CP at the University of Pittsburgh between May 2009 and January 2017 was performed. A video of a robotic Frey procedure is also shown.

RESULTS

Of 812 robotic pancreatic resections and reconstructions 39 were for CP indications. These included 11 total pancreatectomies [with and without auto islet transplantation], 8 Puestow procedures, 4 Frey procedures, 6 pancreaticoduodenectomies, and 10 distal pancreatectomies. Median age was 49, and 41% of the patients were female. The most common etiology for CP was idiopathic pancreatitis (n = 16, 46%). Median operative time was 324 min with a median estimated blood loss of 250 ml. None of the patients required conversion to laparotomy. A Clavien III-IV complication rate was experienced by 5 (13%) patients, including one reoperation. Excluding the eleven patients who underwent TP, rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula was 7% (Grade B = 2, Grade C = 0). No 30 or 90 day mortalities were recorded. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the robotic platform is safe and feasible when tackling complex pancreatic resections for sequelae of chronic pancreatitis.

Robotic longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis: Comparison of clinical outcomes and cost to the open approach

BACKGROUND

This study compares clinical and cost outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) and open longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy (LPJ) for chronic pancreatitis.

METHODS

Clinical and cost data were retrospectively compared between open and RAL LPJ performed at a single center from 2008-2015.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients underwent LPJ: 19 open and 7 RAL. Two robot-assisted cases converted to open were included in the open group for analysis. Patients undergoing RAL LPJ had less intraoperative blood loss, a shorter surgical length of stay, and lower medication costs. Operation supply cost was higher in the RAL group. No difference in hospitalization cost was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Versus the open approach, RAL LPJ performed for chronic pancreatitis shortens hospitalization and reduces medication costs; hospitalization costs are equivalent. A higher operative cost for RAL LPJ is mitigated by a shorter hospitalization. Decreased morbidity and healthcare resource economy support use of the robotic approach for LPJ when appropriate.

Laparoscopic side-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis in children

Surgical pancreatic duct (PD) drainage for chronic pancreatitis in children is relatively rare. It is indicated in cases of recurrent pancreatitis and PD dilatation that have not responded to medical therapy and therapeutic endoscopy. We performed laparoscopic side-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy for two paediatric patients with chronic pancreatitis. The main PD was opened easily by electrocautery after locating the dilated PD by intraoperative ultrasonography. The dilated PD was split longitudinally from the pancreatic tail to the pancreatic head by laparoscopic coagulation shears or electrocautery after pancreatography. A laparoscopic side-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy was performed by a one-layered technique using continuous 4-0 polydioxanone (PDS) sutures from the pancreatic tail to the pancreatic head. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications or recurrences. This procedure has cosmetic advantages compared with open surgery for chronic pancreatitis. Laparoscopic side-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy in children is feasible and effective for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis.

Surgical Management of Chronic Pancreatitis

Advances over the past decade have indicated that a complex interplay between environmental factors, genetic predisposition, alcohol abuse, and smoking lead towards the development of chronic pancreatitis. Chronic pancreatitis is a complex disorder that causes significant and chronic incapacity in patients and a substantial burden on the society. Major advances have been made in the etiology and pathogenesis of this disease and the role of genetic predisposition is increasingly coming to the fore. Advances in noninvasive diagnostic modalities now allow for better diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis at an early stage of the disease. The impact of these advances on surgical treatment is beginning to emerge, for example, patients with certain genetic predispositions may be better treated with total pancreatectomy versus lesser procedures. Considerable controversy remains with respect to the surgical management of chronic pancreatitis. Modern understanding of the neurobiology of pain in chronic pancreatitis suggests that a window of opportunity exists for effective treatment of the intractable pain after which central sensitization can lead to an irreversible pain syndrome in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Effective surgical procedures exist for chronic pancreatitis; however, the timing of surgery is unclear. For optimal treatment of patients with chronic pancreatitis, close collaboration between a multidisciplinary team including gastroenterologists, surgeons, and pain management physicians is needed.

Pancreaticojejunostomy sleeve reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy in laparoscopic and open surgery

This report suggests that sleeve-joint pancreaticojejunostomy reduces the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Introduction:

Laparoscopic procedures for pancreatic surgery have been significantly improved recently; however, only a limited number of successful laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have been reported. The limitations could be attributed to the complexity of the reconstruction procedures under laparoscopic observation and the high incidence of complications. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) has been regarded traditionally as the most frequent major complication and is a potentially serious and life-threatening event. It remains the single most important cause of morbidity after PD and contributes significantly to prolonged mortality. Several modified methods of pancreas anastomosis were introduced to prevent POPF. However, few methods with a satisfactory leakage rate have yet to be seen. Collating principle of theoretical mechanics, we introduce a new method of reconstruction by performing an asymmetric sleeving-joint pancreaticojejunostomy (SJPJ). The aim of this study is to summarize the results of a new technique that is designed to decrease the POPF.

Methods:

From January 2004 to December 2010, SJPJ was performed on 86 patients undergoing PD by 1 surgeon: a laparoscopic reconstruction was completed in 9 cases, a hand-assisted laparoscopic reconstruction in 2 cases, and an open SJPJ reconstruction in 75 cases.

Discussion:

We used SJPJ, an asymmetric pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). The time of operation ranged from 300 minutes to 640 minutes. Postoperatively there were no major morbidities and no deaths. Although POPF was observed in the laparoscopic SJPJ group with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 3 patients developed POPF in the open SJPJ group with ampullary adenocarcinoma (n=1) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n=2). The POPF rate was 9.30% in the open SJPJ group and 9.10% in the laparoscopic SJPJ group. The SJPJ procedure facilitates PJ, both laparoscopically and in open surgery. It is safe, effective, and feasible in experience hands.

Laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreatic ductal dilatation in children

PURPOSE

The application of laparoscopic surgery in pancreatic surgery in children is limited. In this article, we describe laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy for children with congenital pancreatic ductal dilatation.

METHODS

Four children with recurrent pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal dilatation underwent laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy between July 2009 and November 2011. Longitudinal incision of the dilated pancreatic ducts and side-to-side Roux-Y pancreaticojejunostomy were performed.

RESULTS

Operative time ranged from 103 to 154 min, and blood loss was minimal. The average postoperative hospital stay was 4 to 6 days. There were no pancreatic leaks. None of the patients experienced recurrence of pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy for children with congenital pancreatic ductal dilatation is safe and effective.

Minimally invasive treatment of pancreatic disease

Minimally invasive surgery has been widely accepted as an alternative to conventional open surgery in many gastrointestinal fields and is now considered the standard of care in bariatric surgery as well as oncologic surgery of the colon and stomach. Despite the advancements in laparoscopic surgery instrumentation and technique, the anatomic relationships of the pancreas and the need for complex reconstructions have slowed similar progress in management of pancreatic disease. However, numerous recent studies show promising results in laparoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocyst, necrosis, and benign and malignant pancreatic neoplasms. We present the current status of clinical application of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of complicated pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic neoplasms, and provide a review of the relevant literature. Present day and probable future developments, such as the use of robotics, natural orifice techniques, and major vascular reconstruction are also presented.

The minimally invasive approach to surgical management of pancreatic diseases

Laparoscopic pancreas surgery has undergone rapid development over the past decade. Although acceptability among traditional surgeons has been low, emerging specialty centers are reporting excellent outcomes for advanced and complex operations, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy. A note of caution is necessary: These outstanding results are from skilled surgeons, many of whom are pioneers in the field, who have overcome the learning curve over many years of innovation. As the procedures gain wider practice, outcomes need to be carefully watched because many of these procedures are extremely demanding technically. Although many have suggested that controlled, randomized studies comparing laparoscopic pancreatic resections with open resections are necessary to establish the efficacy of laparoscopic procedure, the cumulative data on the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic procedure argues against such an approach. The logistic difficulties of conducting such studies will be considerable given patient preferences, the need for multicenter studies, and the rapid adoption of the laparoscopic procedure among experienced pancreatic surgeons. A more reasonable approach to truly evaluate the safety of these procedures is the establishment of a national registry that can measure progress of the field and record outcomes in the wider, nonspecialty community. Hepatobiliary training programs should also establish a minimal standard of training for many of the advanced procedures, such as the pancreaticoduodenectomy, so that the benefit of laparoscopic surgery can be made available outside of just a few specialty centers.

Robotic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy (Puestow)

A lateral pancreaticojejunostomy (LPJ), also known as the Puestow procedure, is a complex procedure performed for chronic pancreatitis when the pancreatic duct is dilated and unable to drain properly. Traditionally, these procedures are performed with open surgery. A minimally invasive approach to the LPJ using rigid handheld nonarticulating instruments is tedious and rarely performed. In fact, there are no prior laparoscopic case reports for LPJ in children and only a small handful of cases in the adult literature. This lack of laparoscopic information may be an indication of the difficulty in performing this complex operation with nonarticulating laparoscopic instruments. The advantages of robotic surgery may help overcome these difficulties. We present the first robotic LPJ ever reported in a 14-year-old child with idiopathic chronic pancreatitis. This case demonstrates the utility of this advanced surgical technology and may lead to a new minimally invasive option for both adults and children with chronic pancreatitis requiring surgical intervention.

Has the Partington procedure for chronic pancreatitis become a thing of the past? A review of the evidence

INTRODUCTION

For the surgical management of chronic pancreatitis with an inflammatory pancreatic head mass, extended drainage operations such as Beger and Frey procedures were established in the 1980s as an alternative to resectional procedures like pancreaticoduodenectomy and as opposed to simple drainage operations such as lateral pancreaticojejunostomy, that is, the Partington procedure. With the relatively rapid adoption of the two procedures, it seems that the Partington procedure has become a thing of the past.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Partington procedure was re-evaluated with regard to the historical aspects and its present status by a literature review.

RESULTS

The results show that this procedure relieves chronic abdominal pain in 66-91% of patients with a mean follow-up of 3.5-9.1 years. It is important to note that this procedure is generally used for inflammatory disease left of the gastroduodenal artery and is specifically not used as the procedure of choice for inflammatory disease of the pancreatic head.

CONCLUSION

For patients with a dilated main pancreatic duct but without an inflammatory pancreatic head mass, the Partington procedure is still the procedure of choice, since it is technically simple to perform with a minimum of morbidity and mortality, preserving pancreatic endocrine and exocrine function. Because it is a relatively simple technique, the laparoscopic approach will be justified as a treatment of appropriate patients in the near future.

Minimally invasive treatment of pancreatic disease

Although open surgical procedures remain the standard for both benign and malignant diseases of the pancreas, in recent years a wide variety of surgical procedures performed on the pancreas have been completed laparoscopically. This article reviews the application of minimally invasive surgery to the management of both benign and malignant diseases of the pancreas.

Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

For patients with chronic pancreatitis and a dilated pancreatic duct, ductal decompression is recommended. We conducted a randomized trial to compare endoscopic and surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct.

METHODS

All symptomatic patients with chronic pancreatitis and a distal obstruction of the pancreatic duct but without an inflammatory mass were eligible for the study. We randomly assigned patients to undergo endoscopic transampullary drainage of the pancreatic duct or operative pancreaticojejunostomy. The primary end point was the average Izbicki pain score during 2 years of follow-up. The secondary end points were pain relief at the end of follow-up, physical and mental health, morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, number of procedures undergone, and changes in pancreatic function.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients underwent randomization: 19 to endoscopic treatment (16 of whom underwent lithotripsy) and 20 to operative pancreaticojejunostomy. During the 24 months of follow-up, patients who underwent surgery, as compared with those who were treated endoscopically, had lower Izbicki pain scores (25 vs. 51, P<0.001) and better physical health summary scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey questionnaire (P=0.003). At the end of follow-up, complete or partial pain relief was achieved in 32% of patients assigned to endoscopic drainage as compared with 75% of patients assigned to surgical drainage (P=0.007). Rates of complications, length of hospital stay, and changes in pancreatic function were similar in the two treatment groups, but patients receiving endoscopic treatment required more procedures than did patients in the surgery group (a median of eight vs. three, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct was more effective than endoscopic treatment in patients with obstruction of the pancreatic duct due to chronic pancreatitis. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN04572410 [controlled-trials.com].).

Pancreatic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This is a review and summary of pertinent publications that have affected the surgical management of pancreatic disease in 2004.

RECENT FINDINGS

The surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer continues to advance. Over the past year, there have been several reports of collected experiences with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Most patients with pancreatic cancer do not have resectable disease, and the recent thoughts on palliation are discussed. Three institutions published large series on the treatment of intraductal pancreatic mucinous neoplasms. Laparoscopic surgery is being used more widely to manage islet cell tumors of the pancreas and chronic pancreatitis. The complications of acute and chronic pancreatitis continue to be serious concerns for clinicians.

SUMMARY

The surgical management of pancreatic diseases continues to evolve as surgical techniques and our knowledge of the disease processes improve. A renewed clinical and scientific focus on this organ is changing the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms and holds the promise of improved outcomes.