Laparoscopic diagnosis of peritoneal tuberculosis

Intraperitoneal tuberculosis abscess: A rare form of tuberculosis

Tuberculosis is related to high rate of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Extra-pulmonary forms are increasing in incidence. The diagnosis of extrapulmonary locations, especially abdominal, is often difficult because the clinical and biological signs are not specific, leading to a delay in diagnosis and treatment. The intraperitoneal tuberculosis abscess is a particular radio-clinical entity, due to its atypical and confusing symptomatology. We report the case of a 36-year-old female patient who had a peritoneal tuberculosis abscess manifested by diffuse abdominal pain in a febrile context.

Feasibility and Safety of Transgastric Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in the Diagnosis of Ascites of Unknown Origin

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (TG-NOTES) combined with biopsy in the diagnosis of unknown ascites. Method: This retrospective study used data from the first affiliated hospital of Nanchang university on 51 patients who were diagnosed with ascites of unknown origin between January 2013 and May 2019 and experienced peritoneal biopsy through TG-NOTES. The outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy and procedure-related adverse events. Results: TG-NOTES was performed successfully in 46 of 51 patients, tuberculous ascites in 38 cases, carcinomatous ascites in 4 cases, cirrhotic ascites in 1 case, and 3 cases showed no obvious abnormalities in pathological result. Five cases failed to be diagnosed because of abdominal adhesions. The diagnostic rate of TG-NOTES was 84.3%. There were no severe procedure-related adverse events and no mortality. All patients had good wound healing and no complaint of discomfort on follow-up. Conclusion: The majority of ascites of unknown origin can be expounded through TG-NOTES combined with biopsy without severe complication, therefore, it is a feasible and safe method to detect the cause of unexplained ascites.

Use of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of suspected tuberculous peritonitis: a retrospective case series of 7 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In cases of ascites of unknown etiology, tuberculosis peritonitis (TBP) is a possible cause but a diagnostic challenge. This retrospective case series assessed the effectiveness and safety of diagnostic natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES(®); American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Oak Brook, IL] and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons [Los Angeles, CA]) in 7 consecutive patients with suspected TBP.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Between September 2011 and August 2012, peritoneal biopsy was performed using transgastric NOTES for subsequent histology in 7 consecutive hospitalized patients who presented with ascites and were diagnosed with suspected TBP. The outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy and procedure-related morbidities.

RESULTS

Diagnostic NOTES was successfully completed in all 7 patients. Peritoneoscopy with NOTES went uneventfully and lasted 5-10 minutes. Typical peritoneal nodules characteristic of TBP were identified in all patients and confirmed pathologically as TBP. No clinically significant adverse events occurred in any patients following NOTES, except for 1 patient who experienced mild and transient pyrexia. Postoperative blood culture detected no microbial growth. Follow-up upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed that the gastric wall wound healed well with minimal scarring. All patients were prescribed a standard four-drug antituberculosis chemotherapy regimen. The treatment outcomes were determined to be effective or curative, and no relapse was detected within the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

NOTES is an effective and safe diagnostic technique in patients with suspected TBP presenting as ascites of unknown etiology.

Role of ascites adenosine deaminase in differentiating between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis

AIM: To investigate the usefulness of tumor markers and adenosine deaminase in differentiating between tuberculous peritonitis (TBP) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data was performed on consecutive patients who underwent peritoneoscopic and abdominal computed tomography (CT) evaluations. Among 75 patients at the Seoul National University Hospital from January 2000 to June 2010 who underwent both tests, 27 patients (36.0%) and 25 patients (33.3%) were diagnosed with TBP and PC, respectively. Diagnosis was confirmed by peritoneoscopic biopsy.

RESULTS: Serum c-reactive protein (7.88 ± 6.62 mg/dL vs 3.12 ± 2.69 mg/dL, P = 0.01), ascites adenosine deaminase (66.76 ± 32.09 IU/L vs 13.89 ± 8.95 IU/L, P < 0.01), ascites lymphocyte proportion (67.77 ± 23.41% vs 48.36 ± 18.78%, P < 0.01), and serum-ascites albumin gradient (0.72 ± 0.49 g/dL vs 1.05 ± 0.50 g/dL, P = 0.03) were significantly different between the two groups. Among tumor markers, serum and ascites carcinoembryonic antigen, serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 showed significant difference between two groups. Abdominal CT examinations showed that smooth involvement of the parietal peritoneum was more common in the TBP group (77.8% vs 40.7%) whereas nodular involvement was more common in the PC group (14.8% vs 40.7%, P = 0.04). From receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves ascites adenosines deaminase (ADA) showed better discriminative capability than tumor markers. An ADA cut-off level of 21 IU/L was found to yield the best results of differential diagnosis; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 92.0%, 85.0%, 88.5% and 89.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Besides clinical and radiologic findings, ascitic fluid ADA measurement is helpful in the differential diagnosis of TBP and PC.

Targeted detection of 65 kDa heat shock protein gene in endometrial biopsies for reliable diagnosis of genital tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical utility of PCR compared with other available diagnostic modalities in prompt diagnosis of female genital tuberculosis causing infertility.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case-controlled trial. Premenstrual endometrial biopsy specimens were collected from 150 infertile women of reproductive age group suspected of having genital tuberculosis. All patients underwent diagnostic endoscopy (laparoscopy and hysteroscopy) and the samples obtained were subjected to microscopy, culture by the BACTEC 460 TB System, histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of 165 bp region of 65 kDa gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The results were correlated with the laparoscopic findings.

RESULTS

While the laparoscopy/hysteroscopy findings were indicative of tuberculosis in 12.6% of cases, 14.6% of the specimens showed evidence of 65 kDa gene of M. tuberculosis and only 3.33%, 1.33% and 0.66% were positive by culture, smear and histopathology, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Since laparoscopy, hysteroscopy other endoscopic procedures are associated with operative risks and may cause flaring of infection, and other conventional laboratory tests including histopathology have poor sensitivity, PCR-based detection of 65 kDa gene of M. tuberculosis in endometrial biopsy specimens could be a promising molecular diagnostic technique compared to conventional methods of diagnosis.

Peritoneal tuberculosis

The peritoneum is one of the locations outside the most common pulmonary tuberculosis. Peritoneal tuberculosis poses a public health problem in endemic regions of the world. The phenomenon of migration, the increased use of immunosuppressive therapy and the epidemic of AIDS have contributed to a resurgence of this disease in regions where it was previously controlled. The aim of this review is to expose the clinical, biologic end radiologic futures of the peritoneal tuberculosis and to present the methods of diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis of this disease is difficult and still remains a challenge because of its insidious nature, the variability of presentation and limitations of available diagnostic tests. The disease usually presents a picture of lymphocytic exudative ascites. There are many complementary tests with variable sensitivities and specificities to confirm the diagnosis of peritoneal tuberculosis. Isolation of mycobacteria by culture of ascitic fluid or histological examination of peritoneal biopsy ideally performed by laparoscopy remains the investigation of choice. The role of PCR, ascitic adenosine deaminase, interferon gamma and the radiometric BACTEC system can improve the diagnostic yield. An antituberculous treatment with group 1 of the WHO for 6 months is sufficient in most cases.

Emergency laparoscopy for acute abdominal conditions: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Currently, emergency laparoscopic surgery for acute abdominal conditions has become the favored surgical approach; therefore, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopy in acute abdominal pain in Saudi Arabian patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 176 patients with acute abdominal pain (113 patients with pain localized to the right iliac region [group A] and 63 patients with generalized abdominal pain [group B] underwent emergency laparoscopy between January 2002 and December 2006. We evaluated the initial clinical diagnosis, the laparoscopic diagnosis, and the outcome in these two groups of patients.

RESULTS

In group A, a definitive diagnosis was established at laparoscopy in 89% of patients, and it was therapeutic in 81.4% of the patients, and in 9 patients (8%) a conversion to laparotomy was necessary a to manage their condition. In group B, the diagnosis was accurate in 87% of patients, and it was therapeutic in 79.4% of the patients, and in 5 patients (8%) a conversion to laparotomy was necessary. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The emergency laparoscopy is a diagnostic and therapeutic option in the majority of acute abdominal pain conditions.

Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies

BACKGROUND

Emergency laparoscopic exploration can be used to identify the causative pathology of acute abdominal pain. Laparoscopic surgery also allows treatment of many intraabdominal disorders. This report was prepared to describe the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery compared to laparotomy or nonoperative treatment.

METHODS

A panel of European experts in abdominal and gynecological surgery was assembled and participated in a consensus conference using Delphi methods. The aim was to develop evidence-based recommendations for the most common diseases that may cause acute abdominal pain.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Laparoscopic surgery was found to be clearly superior for patients with a presumable diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer, acute cholecystitis, appendicitis, or pelvic inflammatory disease. In the emergency setting, laparoscopy is of unclear or limited value if adhesive bowel obstruction, acute diverticulitis, nonbiliary pancreatitis, hernia incarceration, or mesenteric ischemia are suspected. In stable patients with acute abdominal pain, noninvasive diagnostics should be fully exhausted before considering explorative surgery. However, diagnostic laparoscopy may be useful if no diagnosis can be found by conventional diagnostics. More clinical data are needed on the use of laparoscopy after blunt or penetrating trauma of the abdomen.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to diagnostic and therapeutic advantages, laparoscopic surgery is useful for the majority of conditions underlying acute abdominal pain, but noninvasive diagnostic aids should be exhausted first. Depending on symptom severity, laparoscopy should be advocated if routine diagnostic procedures have failed to yield results.