1
|
Sugase T, Michiura T, Urabe S, Sasaki K, Hayashi N, Yamabe K. Optimal treatment and complications of patients with the perforated upper gastrointestinal tract. Surg Today 2021; 51:1446-1455. [PMID: 33608745 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02247-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The perforation of the upper gastrointestinal tract is still associated with a high risk of complications and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the optimal treatment and post-treatment complications for this condition. METHODS This was a retrospective, single-center study conducted between 2010 and 2019. We analyzed 50 patients with intraperitoneal free air caused by peptic ulcer (44 cases) or cancer (six cases). RESULTS All patients initially received either conservative therapy (n = 7) or surgery (n = 43). The nonsurgically cured patients were significantly younger and had mild peritonitis and also had a shorter hospital stay. Two patients were converted to surgery due to worsening symptoms, and one of them was elderly and had a long perforation-to-treatment time. Regarding postoperative complications, patients with Grade II-V (n = 21) were significantly older and had a poorer physical status, longer perforation-to-surgery time, and higher preoperative CRP and lactate than those with Grade 0-I (n = 24). Multivariable analyses identified elevated preoperative lactate as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. The patients with noncurative surgery for perforated advanced gastric cancer all died within 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Consideration should be given to the nonsurgical indications in elderly and delayed treatment patients and the postoperative outcomes of patients with preoperatively elevated lactate levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahito Sugase
- Department of Surgery, Kinan Hospital, 46-70 Shinjo, Tanabe, Wakayama, 646-8588, Japan.
| | - Toshiya Michiura
- Department of Surgery, Kinan Hospital, 46-70 Shinjo, Tanabe, Wakayama, 646-8588, Japan
| | - Shoichiro Urabe
- Department of Surgery, Kinan Hospital, 46-70 Shinjo, Tanabe, Wakayama, 646-8588, Japan
| | - Kazuki Sasaki
- Department of Surgery, Kinan Hospital, 46-70 Shinjo, Tanabe, Wakayama, 646-8588, Japan
| | - Nobuyasu Hayashi
- Department of Surgery, Kinan Hospital, 46-70 Shinjo, Tanabe, Wakayama, 646-8588, Japan
| | - Kazuo Yamabe
- Department of Surgery, Kinan Hospital, 46-70 Shinjo, Tanabe, Wakayama, 646-8588, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tarasconi A, Coccolini F, Biffl WL, Tomasoni M, Ansaloni L, Picetti E, Molfino S, Shelat V, Cimbanassi S, Weber DG, Abu-Zidan FM, Campanile FC, Di Saverio S, Baiocchi GL, Casella C, Kelly MD, Kirkpatrick AW, Leppaniemi A, Moore EE, Peitzman A, Fraga GP, Ceresoli M, Maier RV, Wani I, Pattonieri V, Perrone G, Velmahos G, Sugrue M, Sartelli M, Kluger Y, Catena F. Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 2020; 15:3. [PMID: 31921329 PMCID: PMC6947898 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-019-0283-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Peptic ulcer disease is common with a lifetime prevalence in the general population of 5-10% and an incidence of 0.1-0.3% per year. Despite a sharp reduction in incidence and rates of hospital admission and mortality over the past 30 years, complications are still encountered in 10-20% of these patients. Peptic ulcer disease remains a significant healthcare problem, which can consume considerable financial resources. Management may involve various subspecialties including surgeons, gastroenterologists, and radiologists. Successful management of patients with complicated peptic ulcer (CPU) involves prompt recognition, resuscitation when required, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and timely surgical/radiological treatment. Methods The present guidelines have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. To create these guidelines, a panel of experts was designed and charged by the board of the WSES to perform a systematic review of the available literature and to provide evidence-based statements with immediate practical application. All the statements were presented and discussed during the 5th WSES Congress, and for each statement, a consensus among the WSES panel of experts was reached. Conclusions The population considered in these guidelines is adult patients with suspected complicated peptic ulcer disease. These guidelines present evidence-based international consensus statements on the management of complicated peptic ulcer from a collaboration of a panel of experts and are intended to improve the knowledge and the awareness of physicians around the world on this specific topic. We divided our work into the two main topics, bleeding and perforated peptic ulcer, and structured it into six main topics that cover the entire management process of patients with complicated peptic ulcer, from diagnosis at ED arrival to post-discharge antimicrobial therapy, to provide an up-to-date, easy-to-use tool that can help physicians and surgeons during the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Tarasconi
- Emergency Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Tomasoni
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Sarah Molfino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Cimbanassi
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Dieter G. Weber
- Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia & The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| | - Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Fabio C. Campanile
- Division of Surgery, ASL VT - Ospedale “Andosilla”, Civita Castellana, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Claudio Casella
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michael D. Kelly
- Department of General Surgery, Albury Hospital, Albury, Australia
| | - Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
- General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta Canada
| | | | - Ernest E. Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, CO USA
| | - Andrew Peitzman
- University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, UPMC – Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Gustavo Pereira Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP Brazil
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Ronald V. Maier
- Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Centre, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Imtaz Wani
- Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India
| | | | - Gennaro Perrone
- Emergency Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - George Velmahos
- Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal Clinical Research Academy Centre for Personalized Medicine, Donegal, Ireland
| | | | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Fausto Catena
- Emergency Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Durai R, Razvi A, Uzkalnis A, Ng PCH. Duodenal ulcer perforation: a district hospital experience. Acta Chir Belg 2011; 111:23-5. [PMID: 21520783 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2011.11680698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Duodenal ulcer perforation still occurs frequently in the 21st century inspite of the wide availability of proton pump inhibitors. METHOD During 2005-2008, 34 patients underwent treatment of duodenal ulcer perforation at the University Hospital Lewisham, London. Laparoscopic or open repair of the perforation was used. In this study, we analysed the outcome of treatment in terms of complications, mortality and hospital stay with relevant to laparoscopy and open approach. RESULTS Ten patients underwent laparoscopic closure and the remaining 24 patients underwent laparotomy. The mean hospital stay for the laparoscopic group was 6.6 days and for open repair group was 12.8 days. There were two wound infection related to open approach and four patients died during the post operative period however the cause of death was not related to the procedure. DISCUSSION Laparoscopy has the advantage of avoiding a big incision and will enable the patient to get discharged home early. However, the only limiting factor is availability of expertise and competency of the surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Durai
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, London, SE13 6LH
| | - A. Razvi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, London, SE13 6LH
| | - A. Uzkalnis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, London, SE13 6LH
| | - Ph. C. H. Ng
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, London, SE13 6LH
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bertleff MJOE, Lange JF. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:1231-9. [PMID: 20033725 PMCID: PMC2869436 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0765-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2009] [Accepted: 11/05/2009] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU), despite antiulcer medication and Helicobacter eradication, is still the most common indication for emergency gastric surgery associated with high morbidity and mortality. Outcome might be improved by performing this procedure laparoscopically, but there is no consensus on whether the benefits of laparoscopic closure of perforated peptic ulcer outweigh the disadvantages such as prolonged surgery time and greater expense. METHODS An electronic literature search was done by using PubMed and EMBASE databases. Relevant papers written between January 1989 and May 2009 were selected and scored according to Effective Public Health Practice Project guidelines. RESULTS Data were extracted from 56 papers, as summarized in Tables 1-7. The overall conversion rate for laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer was 12.4%, with main reason for conversion being the diameter of perforation. Patients presenting with PPU were predominantly men (79%), with an average age of 48 years. One-third had a history of peptic ulcer disease, and one-fifth took nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Only 7% presented with shock at admission. There seems to be no consensus on the perfect setup for surgery and/or operating technique. In the laparoscopic groups, operating time was significant longer and incidence of recurrent leakage at the repair site was higher. Nonetheless there was significant less postoperative pain, lower morbidity, less mortality, and shorter hospital stay. CONCLUSION There are good arguments that laparoscopic correction of PPU should be first treatment of choice. A Boey score of 3, age over 70 years, and symptoms persisting longer than 24 h are associated with higher morbidity and mortality and should be considered contraindications for laparoscopic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariëtta J O E Bertleff
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital Maastricht, P.Debeyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Endoscopic closure of duodenal perforations by using an over-the-scope clip: a randomized, controlled porcine study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:131-8. [PMID: 19883907 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2009] [Accepted: 07/02/2009] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Duodenal perforations during diagnostic upper endoscopy are rare; however, when therapeutic techniques are performed, the reported incidence is as great as 2.8%. Surgical repair is usually mandated, but it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE To compare closure of duodenal perforations by using an over-the-scope clip (OTSC) with a surgical closure. DESIGN Randomized, controlled animal study. SETTING Animal facility laboratory. ANIMALS Domestic pigs (24 females). INTERVENTIONS Large (10-mm) duodenal perforations were created by using an endoscopic needle-knife. The animals were randomly assigned to either open surgical repair (n=12) or endoscopic closure by using the OTSC system (n=12). Pressurized leak tests were performed during necropsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS One major bleed occurred because of a liver injury during creation of the duodenotomy. Mean time for endoscopic closure was 5 minutes (range, 3-8 min; SD +/- 2). No complications occurred during any of the closure procedures. At necropsy, all OTSC and surgical closures demonstrated complete sealing of duodenotomy sites. Pressurized leak tests demonstrated a mean burst pressure of 166 mm Hg (range, 80-260; SD +/- 65) for OTSC closures and 143 mm Hg (range, 30-300, SD +/- 83) for surgical sutures. Ex vivo intact duodenal specimens exhibited a mean burst pressure of 247 mm Hg (range, 200-300; SD +/- 35), which was significantly higher compared with in vivo OTSC and surgical closures (P < .01). There were no significant differences between burst pressures of OTSC and surgical closures (P = .461). LIMITATIONS Nonsurvival setting. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic closure of duodenal perforations by using the OTSC system is comparable with surgical closure in a nonsurvival porcine model. This technique is easy to perform and seems suitable for repairing duodenal perforations.
Collapse
|