Timing of surgical intervention does not influence return of esophageal peristalsis or outcome for patients with achalasia

True peristaltic recovery is uncommon following treatment, particularly endoscopic dilation for achalasia cardia, though pseudo-recovery often occurs

BACKGROUND

Relieving esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstruction has been the focus of treatment for achalasia cardia. The recovery of peristalsis has been an elusive goal. Studies analyzing post-intervention peristaltic recovery have several limitations such as the use of conventional manometry or lack of standard definitions of peristalsis. Accordingly, we undertook this study to analyze frequency and pattern of peristaltic recovery following treatment for achalasia cardia on high-resolution manometry (HRM) and standard Chicago definition of peristalsis.

METHODS

Pre and post-intervention HRM records of 71 treatment-naive patients diagnosed as achalasia cardia were retrospectively analyzed. Records with pre and post-intervention HRM on different systems (e.g. solid state and water perfusion) and those with inadequate information were excluded. All HRMs were interpreted as per Chicago classification version 3.0. After pneumatic dilation (PD) or laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM), pseudorecovery of peristalsis was defined as any contraction at least 3 cm in length along 20 mmHg isobaric contour with a distal latency of less than 4.5 seconds. True recovery and premature contractions were defined by standard Chicago classification v3.0 criteria.

RESULTS

Change in diagnosis was observed in 38 of 71 (53.5%) patients after intervention. While pseudo-peristaltic recovery occurred in 11 of 71 (15.5%) patients, only three (4.2%) had a true recovery. Another nine (12.7%) patients showed new premature contractions.

CONCLUSION

True peristaltic recovery is uncommon in achalasia cardia following intervention, particularly PD. Pseudo-peristaltic recovery is more common. Further research is warranted on this issue.

Esophageal Motility Patterns After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients With Achalasia

Background/Aims

Several studies have reported partial recovery of peristalsis in patients with achalasia after myotomy. The aim of our study is to analyze esophageal motility patterns after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and to assess the potential predictors and clinical impact of peristaltic recovery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients with achalasia undergoing POEM at a tertiary center. High-resolution manometry (HRM) studies prior to and after POEM were reviewed and the Chicago classification was applied.

Results

A total of 237 patients were analyzed. The initial HRM diagnoses were achalasia type I, 42 (17.7%); type II, 173 (73.0%); and type III, 22 (9.3%). Before POEM, peristaltic fragments were present in 23 (9.7%) patients. After POEM the Chicago classification diagnoses were 112 absent contractility, 42 type I achalasia, 15 type II, 11 type III, 26 ineffective esophageal motility, 18 esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, 10 fragmented peristalsis, and 3 distal esophageal spasm. Altogether 68 patients (28.7%) had signs of contractile activity, but the contractions newly appeared in 47 patients (47/214, 22.0%). Type II achalasia showed a trend for appearance of contractions (P = 0.097). Logistic regression analysis did not identify any predictors of peristaltic recovery. The post-POEM Eckardt score did not differ between patients with and without contractions nor did the parameters of timed barium esophagogram.

Conclusions

More than 20% of achalasia patients have signs of partial recovery of esophageal peristalsis after POEM. It occurs predominantly in type II achalasia but the clinical relevance seems to be negligible.

Role of Rapid Drink Challenge During Esophageal High-resolution Manometry in Predicting Outcome of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients With Achalasia

Background/Aims

Peroral endoscopy myotomy (POEM) is effective to treat achalasia. We aim to determine POEM effect on esophageal function and search for predictive factors of response to POEM and co-occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods

A total of 64 untreated achalasia patients who underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) before and 3 months after POEM were retrospectively included. Response to treatment was defined as an Eckardt score < 3. Reflux symptoms and patient's satisfaction were evaluated. Data were compared using paired t test, Chi-square test or log rank test.

Results

The 2-year success rate in response to POEM was 90%. All responders reported being satisfied while only 33% of non-responders did (P < 0.001) and 64% of patients with reflux symptoms were satisfied versus 96% of those without (P = 0.009). On HRM, the integrated relaxation pressure and the contractile pattern changed significantly after POEM but were not predictive of response. Between pre and post POEM HRM, a decrease in maximal esophageal pressurization during rapid drink challenge (RDC) was associated with a better response rate than an increase of pressurization (91% vs 50%, P = 0.004). As evidenced by pH monitoring performed after POEM, GERD was pathological or borderline in 50% of patients (18/36) while only 19% (11/59) reported clinically significant reflux symptoms. On post POEM HRM, maximal esophageal pressurization during RDC was lower in patients with pathological or borderline GERD compared to those without (P = 0.054).

Conclusions

Esophageal HRM parameters changed significantly after POEM. Maximal esophageal pressurization during RDC may be useful to predict outcome.

Mechanical dilation, botulinum toxin A injection, and surgical myotomy with fundoplication for treatment of lower esophageal sphincter achalasia-like syndrome in dogs

Background

Megaesophagus (ME) carries a poor long‐term prognosis in dogs. In people, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) achalasia is a rare cause of ME that may respond to targeted intervention. Dogs with lower esophageal sphincter achalasia‐like syndrome (LES‐AS) have been described recently, warranting investigation of analogous targeted treatment.

Hypothesis/Objectives

Evaluate response of dogs with LES‐AS to LES mechanical dilation and botulinum toxin A (BTA) injections, with or without surgical myotomy and fundoplication. We hypothesized that clinical and videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) features of LES‐AS would improve after treatment targeting functional LES obstruction.

Animals

Fourteen client‐owned dogs with LES‐AS diagnosed by VFSS.

Methods

Retrospective study. Dogs diagnosed with LES‐AS underwent treatment between April 2015 and December 2017. Outcome measures included client perception of clinical severity, body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS), regurgitation frequency, and VFSS parameters (ME, esophageal motility, gastric filling). Dogs with positive responses were considered candidates for LES myotomy with fundoplication.

Results

By a median IQR of 21 (IQR, 14‐25) days after mechanical dilation and BTA, clients reported clinical improvement in 100% of dogs, BW increased 20.4% (IQR, 12.7%‐25%), pre‐ and post‐treatment BCS was 3 (IQR, 3‐4) and 5 (IQR, 4‐5), respectively, and frequency of regurgitation decreased by 80% (IQR, 50%‐85%). Duration of effect was 40 (IQR, 17‐53) days. Despite clinical improvement, ME and abnormal esophageal motility persisted in 14 dogs. Six dogs subsequently underwent myotomy and fundoplication and maintained improvement observed after mechanical dilation and BTA.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Dogs with LES‐AS experienced significant, temporary, clinical improvement after mechanical dilation and BTA. Preliminary results suggest myotomy with fundoplication provide lasting clinical benefit despite persistence of ME.

Partial recovery of peristalsis after myotomy for achalasia: more the rule than the exception

IMPORTANCE

Although successful treatment of achalasia depends on alleviating the obstruction at the esophagogastric junction, the postintervention contractile and pressurization pattern may also play a role in outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether myotomy that alleviates the esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction in achalasia might improve peristalsis.

DESIGN

Retrospective study from August 1, 2004, through January 30, 2012.

SETTING

Two tertiary care hospitals in Chicago and Lyon.

PATIENTS

We included 30 patients (18 male; mean age [range], 43 [17-78] years), of whom 8 had type 1 (26.6%), 17 had type 2 (56.7%), and 5 (16.7%) had type 3 achalasia according to the Chicago classification.

INTERVENTIONS

Esophageal high-resolution manometry before and after laparoscopic or endoscopic myotomy.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE

The integrity of peristalsis, characterized as intact, weak contractions; frequent failed peristalsis; or premature contractions.

RESULTS

Although peristaltic fragments were evident only in patients with type 3 achalasia before treatment, intact, weak, or frequent failed peristalsis was encountered in 5 patients with type 1 (63%), 8 with type 2 (47%), and 4 with type 3 (80%) achalasia after myotomy. One patient with type 3 achalasia had distal esophageal spasm after treatment. In patients with a postmyotomy integrated relaxation pressure of less than 15 mm Hg, only 10 (40%) had persistent absent peristalsis. Panesophageal pressurization disappeared after myotomy in 16 of 19 patients. In the 5 patients with postmyotomy integrated relaxation pressure of more than 15 mm Hg, 4 had weak peristalsis and 1 had absent peristalsis.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Reduction or normalization of the esophagogastric junction relaxation pressure achieved by myotomy in achalasia is associated with partial recovery of peristalsis in some patients, suggesting that the disease process progresses from the esophagogastric junction to the esophageal body. Whether the return of peristalsis is predictive of an improved therapeutic outcome requires further study.

Functional analysis of long-term outcome after Heller's myotomy for achalasia

Treatment of achalasia aims at reducing the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and palliate symptoms. Our objective in this study was to investigate functional changes of the esophagus after Heller myotomy and evaluate their influence on postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal morphologic changes. Between 1980 and 2003, 216 patients with achalasia underwent Heller myotomy, associated with anterior partial fundoplication (Dor fundoplication). Preoperative and long-term outcome data were collected from these patients at our hospital. The objective was to analyze esophageal functional results after Heller myotomy in the long term. Results were classified as excellent, good, fair, or poor, according to Vantrappen and Hellemans' modified classification. One-year, 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 20-year postoperative follow-up information was available in 100% of all patients, 91.7%, 85.1%, 60%, 52.6%, and 45.9%, respectively. There were no perioperative deaths. One year after the surgery, all patients had a significant reduction in symptoms of dysphagia and regurgitation. Five years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years after surgery, there were 77.2% of patients (142 in 184), 68.1%, 57.1%, and 54.5%, respectively, who were satisfied (excellent to good) with surgery. No esophageal peristalsis was demonstrated in patients during follow-up. Contractile waves in the body of the esophagus were simultaneous. The difference in the distal esophageal amplitude, the LES relaxation rate, and LES pressures in the anterior wall and/ or two sides was significant (P < 0.05) when compared before and after operation. However, there was no significant difference in the LES length and LES pressure in the posterior side. The change of direction of the LES pressure and the relaxation of LES correlate with long-term outcomes. Postoperative gastroesophageal reflux rates, including nocturnal reflux, increased with time. The percentage of patients whose esophageal diameter became normal or remained mildly increased with time in the first 10 years after surgery changed significantly. Myotomy is an effective way to palliate symptoms in patients with achalasia. Adequate myotomy can lead to reduction of LES pressure in two or three directions, which may facilitate esophageal emptying by gravity. Surgical intervention does not lead to the return of esophageal peristalsis. Functional damage of LES in patients with achalasia is irreversible.

A pneumatic dilation strategy in achalasia: prospective outcome and effects on oesophageal motor function in the long term

BACKGROUND

Long-term follow-up studies of achalasia after pneumatic dilation, mostly retrospective, have shown variable results.

AIM

To examine the outcome of achalasia after pneumatic dilation using a prospective follow-up programme.

METHODS

One or two dilations (first dilation treatment) in 77 patients to achieve stable (>1 year) remission and patients followed up with yearly clinical and manometric assessments. Endoscopy, pH monitoring and barium swallow were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients achieved stable remission and were followed up for 5.6 years (3-10.7) [median (IQ range)], whereas six patients underwent cardiomyotomy and two experienced a perforation. Twelve of the 69 patients relapsed after 2.6 years (1.7-5.1): nine of 12 underwent one to two further dilations. Six-year remission rate (by Kaplan-Meyer estimates) was 82% after first dilation treatment and 96% after all dilations. Continuous antisecretory treatment was clinically needed in 16%, oesophagitis present in 7% and reflux pathological in 28% of the patients. Beneficial effects of dilation on oesophageal motility and on diameter of the oesophageal body at barium swallow were maintained during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A management strategy including sessions of pneumatic dilation until stable remission and a standardized follow-up is highly successful in the long term. Gastro-oesophageal reflux is clinically relevant in a minority of patients.

Current clinical approach to achalasia

Idiopathic achalasia is a rare primary motility disorder of the esophagus. The classical features are incomplete relaxation of a frequently hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and a lack of peristalsis in the tubular esophagus. These motor abnormalities lead to dysphagia, stasis, regurgitation, weight loss, or secondary respiratory complications. Although major strides have been made in understanding the pathogenesis of this rare disorder, including a probable autoimmune mediated destruction of inhibitory neurons in response to an unknown insult in genetically susceptible individuals, a definite trigger has not been identified. The diagnosis of achalasia is suggested by clinical features and confirmed by further diagnostic tests, such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), manometry or barium swallow. These studies are not only used to exclude pseudoachalasia, but also might help to categorize the disease by severity or clinical subtype. Recent advances in diagnostic methods, including high resolution manometry (HRM), might allow prediction of treatment responses. The primary treatments for achieving long-term symptom relief are surgery and endoscopic methods. Although limited high-quality data exist, it appears that laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication is superior to endoscopic methods in achieving long-term relief of symptoms in the majority of patients. However, the current clinical approach to achalasia will depend not only on patients’ characteristics and clinical subtypes of the disease, but also on local expertise and patient preferences.

Clinical, radiological, and manometric profile in 145 patients with untreated achalasia

BACKGROUND

Esophageal achalasia is characterized by the absence of esophageal peristalsis and by a dysfunctional lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Descriptions of clinical, radiological, and manometric findings in patients with achalasia usually have been based on small numbers of patients. This study was designed to determine in patients with untreated achalasia: (1) clinical presentation; (2) how often a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was erroneously made based on the presence of heartburn; (3) manometric profile; (4) relationship between chest pain and the manometric finding of vigorous achalasia.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2004, a diagnosis of esophageal achalasia was established in 145 patients. None of them had been previously treated (no previous endoscopic or surgical treatment). We evaluated the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the results of the endoscopy, barium swallow, esophageal manometry, and ambulatory pH monitoring. We also compared the clinical and the manometric profile of patients with classic and patients with vigorous achalasia.

RESULTS

Most patients with untreated achalasia had dysphagia (94%). Regurgitation was present in 76% and heartburn in 52%. Chest pain (41%) and weight loss (35%) were less common. Acid-suppressing medications had been prescribed to 65 patients (45%) who complained of heartburn on the assumption that GERD was present. The LES was hypertensive in 43% of patients only. There was no significant difference in the prevalence, severity, and duration of chest pain in patients with classic and with vigorous achalasia.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that in patients with untreated achalasia: (1) dysphagia was the most frequent complaint, but regurgitation and heartburn were frequently present; (2) a diagnosis of GERD based on the presence of heartburn was highly unreliable; (3) the LES was hypertensive in less than half of patients; and (4) the prevalence, severity, and duration of chest pain did not correlate with the manometric finding of vigorous achalasia.

Return of esophageal function after treatment for achalasia as determined by impedance-manometry

BACKGROUND

Treatment for achalasia is aimed at the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), although little is known about the effect, if any, of these treatments on esophageal body function (peristalsis and clearance). We sought to measure the effect of various treatments using combined manometry (peristalsis) with Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance (MII) (esophageal clearance).

METHODS

We enrolled 56 patients with Achalasia referred to the University of Washington Swallowing Center between January 2003 and January 2006. Each was grouped according to prior treatment: 38 were untreated (untreated achalasia), 10 had undergone botox injection or balloon dilation (endoscopic treatment), and 16 a laparoscopic Heller myotomy. The preoperative studies for 8 of the myotomy patients were included in the untreated achalasia group. Each patient completed a dysphagia severity questionnaire (scale 0-10). Peristalsis was analyzed by manometry and esophageal clearance of liquid and viscous material by MII.

RESULTS

Mean dysphagia severity scores were significantly better in patients after Heller Myotomy than in either of the other groups (2.0 vs. 5.3 in the endoscopic group and 6.5 in untreated achalasia, p < 0.05). Peristaltic contractions were observed in 63% of patients in the Heller myotomy group, compared with 40% in the endoscopic group and 8% in untreated achalasia (p < 0.05 for both treatment groups vs. untreated achalasia). Liquid clearance rates were significantly better in both treatment groups: 28% in Heller myotomy and 16% in endoscopic treatment compared to only 5% in untreated achalasia (p < 0.05). Similarly, viscous clearance rates were 19% in Heller myotomy and 11% in endoscopic treatment, vs. 2% in untreated achalasia (p < 0.05). In the subset of patients who underwent manometry/MII both pre- and postoperatively, peristalsis was observed more frequently postoperatively than in preop studies (63% of patients exhibiting peristalsis vs. 12%), as was complete clearance of liquid (35% of swallows vs. 14%) and viscous boluses (22% of swallows vs. 14%). These differences were not significant, however. In the patients who had a myotomy the return of peristalsis correlates with effective esophageal clearance (liquid bolus: r = 0.46, p = 0.09 and viscous bolus: r = 0.63, p < 0.05). There is no correlation between peristalsis and bolus clearance in the endoscopic treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

With treatment Achalasia patients exhibit some restoration in peristalsis as well as improved bolus clearance. After Heller Myotomy, the return of peristalsis correlates with esophageal clearance, which may partly explain its superior relief of dysphagia.