Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in emergency surgery. Because of lack of consensus about the most appropriate technique, appendectomy is still being performed by both open (OA) and laparoscopic (LA) methods. In this retrospective analysis, we aimed to compare the laparoscopic approach and the conventional technique in the treatment of acute appendicitis.

METHODS

Retrospectively collected data from 593 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis were studied. These comprised 310 patients who underwent conventional appendectomy and 283 patients treated laparoscopically. The two groups were compared for operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, complication rate, return to normal activity and cost.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (2.7 ± 2.5 days in LA and 1.4 ± 0.6 days in OA), with a less need for analgesia and with a faster return to daily activities (11.5 ± 3.1 days in LA and 16.1 ± 3.3 in OA). Operative time was significantly shorter in the open group (31.36 ± 11.13 min in OA and 54.9 ± 14.2 in LA). Total number of complications was less in the LA group with a significantly lower incidence of wound infection (1.4 % vs 10.6 %, P <0.001). The total cost of treatment was higher by 150 € in the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic approach is a safe and efficient operative procedure in appendectomy and it provides clinically beneficial advantages over open method (including shorter hospital stay, decreased need for postoperative analgesia, early food tolerance, earlier return to work, lower rate of wound infection) against only marginally higher hospital costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02867072 Registered 10 August 2016. Retrospectively registered.

The feasibility of bipolar tissue sealer for appendix stump closure

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal stump closure is a highly important step in laparoscopic appendectomy, especially for post-operative complications. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of suture ligation and bipolar tissue sealer techniques on burst pressure using flesh appendectomy specimens.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Appendectomy specimens of 32 patients with grade I-II disease were included in the study. Perforated or necrotic appendices and specimens ineligible for pressure measurement were excluded from the study. Appendiceal stumps of 16 patients in group 1 were double-ligated with 2/0 polyglactin sutures, then appendectomy was performed between these sutures. In group 2, the management of the stump was performed through single ligation with polyglactin suture, followed by appendectomy using a bipolar tissue sealing device. Burst pressures were recorded for all specimens.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups in terms of age and sex. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of burst pressure (p = 0.92). Also, no significant difference was found between groups in terms of localization of the perforation (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Bipolar tissue sealer achieves safe stump closure with satisfactory burst pressure values. Based on this, using bipolar tissue sealer for appendiceal stump closure in appendicitis may be safe and reliable.

Appendiceal stump closure by metal endoclip in the management of complicated acute appendicitis

Background

Closure of appendicular stump has been performed in different ways; however, the use of the metal endoclip in complicated grades of acute appendicitis, has not been evaluated yet in a prospective way.

Objective

To establish the effectiveness of appendiceal stump closure by metal endoclip for complicated appendicitis.

Method

From January 2009 to January 2011 were evaluated 131 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis. From those, 118 underwent appendiceal stump closure by metal endoclip. The patient’s age ranged from 12 to 75 years old (31.7 ± 13.3) and 52.7% were male. Complicated appendicitis refers to gangrenous and/or perforated appendix, which may lead to abscess formation and degrees of peritonitis. The outcomes viability, operative time, infection complication, operative complications, and conversion rate were chosen to evaluate the procedure.

Results

The appendiceal stump closure by metal endoclip was used in 90% of cases. The presence of appendix base necrosis was the most important factor involved in failure of the procedure. Laparoscopic knot (1.5%), laparoscopic endo-suture (3.8%) and video assisted laparotomy (4.7%) were the alternatives used in difficult cases. The mean operative time was (67.54 ± 28.13 minutes). The wound and intra-abdominal infection rates were 2.54% and 5.08%, respectively. There were no operative complications and the conversion rate was 0.85%.

Conclusion

The appendiceal stump closure by metal endoclip, in complicated grades of acute appendicitis, is a safe and effective procedure. In patients with appendix base necrosis it should be avoided in favor of other alternatives.

The appendiceal stump closure during laparoscopy: historical, surgical, and future perspectives

During a laparoscopic appendectomy, the closure of the appendiceal stump is an important step because of postoperative complications from its inappropriate management. The development of life-threatening events such as stercoral fistulas, postoperative peritonitis, and sepsis is feared and unwanted. The tactical modification of the appendiceal stump closure with a single endoligature, replacing the invaginating suture, adjusted very well to laparoscopic appendectomy, and nowadays is the procedure of choice, whenever possible. Among the alternatives that do not make use of an invaginating suture, studies advocate the use of an endostapler, endoligature (endo-loop), metal clips, bipolar endocoagulation, and polymeric clips. All alternatives have advantages and disadvantages against the different clinical stages of acute appendicitis, and it should be noted that the different forms of appendiceal stump closure have never been assessed in prospective randomized studies. Knowledge about and appropriate use of all of them are important for a safe and more cost-effective procedure.

Laparoscopic appendectomies: experience of a surgical unit

Appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen in adults and appendectomy is the most common emergency abdominal procedure. Laparoscopic appendectomy has gained popularity only in recent years and the optimal approach for the treatment of acute appendicitis is still under debate. This retrospective study aimed at examining the current indications for laparoscopic appendectomy. 1024 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy between February 1992 and December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. 39.9% of patients (n=408) underwent emergency surgery. In 616 cases (60.1%) conservative management was performed in vain and these patients underwent an elective operation. In the 36 patients with an intraoperative normal appendix, other pathological findings were laparoscopically detected and treated. Conversion to an open procedure was required for 13 (1.3%) cases. The mean operative time was 38 min and the average length of postoperative hospitalization was 2.5 days. The overall morbidity rate was 2.6%. Laparoscopic appendectomy should be considered a procedure of choice for the treatment of non-complicated appendicitis. We stress the possibility to laparoscopically treat even complicated appendicitis in the surgical setting with substantial experience in minimally invasive surgery.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Which way to go?

AIM: To compare the outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 293 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis were studied. These comprised of 165 patients who underwent conventional appendectomy and 128 patients treated laparoscopically. The two groups were compared with respect to operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, complication rate and cost.

RESULTS: There were no statistical differences regarding patient characteristics between the two groups. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 2 patients (1.5%). Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (2.2 d vs 3.1 d, P = 0.04), and lower incidence of wound infection (5.3% vs 12.8%, P = 0.03). However, in patients with complicated disease, intra-abdominal abscess formation was more common after laparoscopic appendectomy (5.3% vs 2.1%, P = 0.002). The operative time and analgesia requirements were similar in the two groups. The cost of treatment was higher by 370 € in the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe and efficient as open appendectomy, provided surgical experience and equipment are available.

Efetividade e segurança da apendicectomia videoassistida em porta única transumbilical em adolescentes e adultos

OBJETIVO: Aplicar o método apendicectomia videoassistida em porta única transumbilical (AVATU) e avaliar a sua efetividade e a sua segurança. MÉTODO: A AVATU visa combinar os benefícios do acesso laparoscópico com a segurança e simplicidade da remoção do apêndice pela técnica convencional. Analisou-se, retrospectivamente, 300 adolescentes e adultos, com diagnóstico pressuposto de apendicite aguda, nos quais indicou-se a AVATU como abordagem inicial, entre junho de 2001 e junho de 2006. A exeqüibilidade do procedimento no tratamento da apendicite aguda em todos os seus estágios de evolução, tempo operatório e a necessidade de conversão para apendicectomia convencional ou laparoscópica, foram os parâmetros utilizados para avaliação da efetividade do método. A segurança foi avaliada pela incidência de complicações transoperatórias, pós-operatórias e mortalidade. RESULTADOS: Houve necessidade de conversão para a via convencional ou laparoscópica em 9% dos casos. As principais causas de conversão foram aderências inflamatórias locais densas e apendicite aguda nas suas formas mais avançadas. A incidência de complicações pós-operatórias foi de 6,6%, incluindo 1,3% de abscesso intra-abdominal e 2,0% de infecção de sítio cirúrgico. Não ocorreram óbitos. O resultado histopatológico confirmou 11,7% de apendicite em estágio avançado. CONCLUSÃO: A AVATU mostrou-se exeqüível, efetiva e segura. Os resultados deste estudo e os atrativos da técnica, podem avalizar a recomendação do método na abordagem inicial de pacientes adolescentes e adultos, com suspeita de apendicite aguda.