A comparison of the effects of pneumoperitoneum and laparotomy on natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity and Walker tumor growth in Wistar rats

Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted surgery and laparotomy for treating locally advanced distal gastric antral cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety, feasibility and mid-term results of laparoscopy-assisted surgery in the treatment of locally advanced gastric antral cancer. The clinical data of 50 patients who received laparoscopy-assisted surgery (Group A) and 62 patients who were treated by conventional laparotomy (Group B) from August 2009 to January 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical incision length, the volume of blood loss, the intestinal function recovery time, the postoperative complications, the postoperative 1- and 3-year cumulative survival rates and the average survival time in the two groups were observed. The results of the two groups were compared using the χ² test for the enumeration data, a t-test for the numerical data and a Wilcoxon rank sum test for the skewed data. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier method of single factor analysis was utilized to comwpare the 1- and 3-year cumulative survival rates, as well as the average survival time of the two groups. The results indicated that the duration of surgery for Group A was significantly longer compared with that of Group B (P<0.05); however, the incision length and the volume of intraoperative blood loss in Group A were significantly smaller compared with those of Group B (P<0.01). Furthermore, in Group A, the recovery of intestinal function was more rapid and the time spent in hospital was shorter. However, between Groups A and B, the respective number of dissected lymph nodes (16.3 and 17.2), 1-year survival rates (86.0 and 88.6%) and 3-year survival rates (52.6 and 53.7%) were not significantly different (P<0.05). The results indicate that laparoscopy-assisted surgery is a safe approach for the treatment of locally advanced gastric antral cancer and has beneficial treatment effects. Laparoscopy-assisted surgery is advantageous compared with laparotomy, due to the smaller incision length and reductions in intraoperative blood loss, invasiveness, postoperative recovery time and the number of complications.

Decreased expression of hepatic signaling phosphoproteins after laparoscopic and hand-assisted surgery in a porcine model

OBJECTIVE

Minimally-invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with a decreased activation of both systemic and peritoneal immunity compared with the open technique. However, hepatic response to laparoscopic (LAP) and hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) surgery has not been defined well. We postulated that both LAP and HAL approaches are associated with a diminished activation of hepatic inflammatory signaling pathways compared with the traditional open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen pigs underwent a transabdominal nephrectomy via Open, HAL, or LAP approach. Liver samples were obtained 24 h postoperatively and spot frozen. Frozen tissue samples were then homogenized and the nuclear pellets were separated and stored. Nuclear extracts were analyzed for activation of three nuclear signaling phosphoproteins: nuclear factor-kappaB (NFκB)-p65, heat-shock protein 27 (HSP27), and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (p38MAPK) using a standard Bioplex technique. Statistical comparison was performed using ANOVA and Student's t-test.

RESULTS

The average expression of HSP27 was significantly higher in the Open versus either the LAP or the HAL groups (P = 0.028 and P = 0.039). The average expression of NFκB-p65 was significantly higher in the Open versus either the LAP or the HAL groups (P = 0.032 and P = 0.049). The average expression of p38MAPK was significantly higher in the Open versus either the LAP or the HAL groups (P = 0.007 and P = 0.036). There was no significant difference in the expressions of HSP27 and NFκB-p65 between LAP and HAL groups (P = 0.38 and P = 0.20), however, detection of p38MAPK generated statistical difference between these two groups (P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been widely accepted as an effective alternative to traditional laparoscopic procedures. We demonstrated that both laparoscopic and hand-assisted approaches resulted in blunted hepatic stress manifested by diminished expression of hepatic HSP27, NFκB, and p38-MAPK. In addition, the hand-assisted approach was equal to the laparoscopic approach in two of the three phosphoproteins studied. It appears that the use of hand-assisted techniques did not abrogate immunologic benefits of pure laparoscopy. Overall, in addition to the clinical benefits of minimal access, both hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques may also confer an immunologic advantage over laparotomy.

The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed? : A single-center review of a 15-year experience

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy has been practiced more and more in the management of abdominal emergencies. The aim of the present work was to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control 5-year experience of laparoscopic versus open surgery for abdominal emergencies carried out at our institution, especially with regard to whether our attitude toward use of this procedure has changed as compared with the beginning of our laparoscopic emergency experience (1991-2002).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2002 to January 2007 a total of 670 patients underwent emergent and/or urgent laparoscopy (small bowel obstruction, 17; gastroduodenal ulcer disease, 16; biliary disease, 118; pelvic disease and non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP), 512; colonic perforations, 7) at the hands of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy

RESULTS

The conversion rate was 0.15%. Major complications ranged as high as 1.9% with no postoperative mortality. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 98.3% of the cases, and all such patients were treated successfully by laparoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that laparoscopy is not an alternative to physical examination/good clinical judgment or to conventional noninvasive diagnostic methods in treating the patient with symptoms of an acute abdomen. However it must be considered an effective option in treating patients in whom these methods fail and as a challenging alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal emergencies.