Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: 100 consecutive cases

Trends and benefits of prophylactic ureter catheters in the era of minimally invasive surgery

BACKGROUND

The recent spike in ureter injury (UI) amidst the rise of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has focused attention on the propriety of prophylactic ureter catheters (PUCs) for abdominopelvic operations.

METHODS

A retrospective review of PUCs for rectal cancer resection following neoadjuvant therapy, combined with a comprehensive literature review.

RESULTS

There were zero UI in the current study. Literature review revealed a nationwide spike in PUCs in the last 30 years, dependent on operation: 1) colorectal resection-increased from 1.1% to 4.4%, 2) sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis-increased from 6.7% to 16.3%. This 2-4 fold increase parallels the rise of MIS: 15 of the 20 latest studies (75%) either combined open operations and MIS (4 studies) or focused solely on MIS (11 studies). Medial-to-lateral dissection identified as a UI risk factor. Only 20-30% of UI identified intraoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative UI is missed in 70-80% of cases. The prevention, identification, ease of ureter repair, and net decrease in operative time support the use of PUCs. Medial-to-lateral dissection is identified as a potential contributing factor to UI.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of undergoing restorative proctocolectomy through ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (RPC-IPAA) with hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALS) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 40 consecutive patients who underwent RPC-IPAA with HALS or open technique for treatment of UC between 2010 and 2013. Moreover, the intra-/post-operative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

We found the median operative time was significantly longer in the HALS group while the blood loss was significantly less in patients with HALS than with open surgery. In the HALS group, the median duration of bed rest and the length of hospital stay were significantly shorter. Moreover, the rate of early post-operative complications in the HALS group was significantly less than that in the open surgery group, among which one patient died in the 30th day after surgery for the extensive use of steroids before the operation.

CONCLUSION

These findings clearly show that HALS RPC is safe and less invasiveness. HALS can become a more comfortable and standardised procedure for UC with the adoption of evolving technologies.

Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Reoperative Abdomen or Pelvis

Laparoscopy has become widely accepted as the preferred surgical approach in the management of benign and malignant colorectal diseases. Once considered a relative contraindication in patients with prior abdominal surgery (PAS), as surgeons have continued to gain expertise in advanced laparoscopy, minimally invasive approaches have been increasingly incorporated in the reoperative abdomen and pelvis. Although earlier studies have described conversion rates, most contemporary series evaluating the impact of PAS in laparoscopic colorectal resection have reported equivalent conversion and morbidity rates between reoperative and non-reoperative cases, and series evaluating the impact of laparoscopy in reoperative cases have demonstrated improved short-term outcomes with laparoscopy. The data overall highlight the importance of case selection, careful preoperative preparation and planning, and the critical role of surgeons' expertise in advanced laparoscopic techniques. Challenges to the widespread adoption of minimally invasive techniques in reoperative colorectal cases include the longer learning curve and longer operative time. However, with the steady increase in adoption of minimally invasive techniques worldwide, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is likely to continue to be applied in the management of increasingly complex reoperative colorectal cases in an effort to improve patient outcomes. In the hands of experienced MIS surgeons and in carefully selected cases, laparoscopy is both safe and efficacious for reoperative procedures in the abdomen and pelvis, with measurable short-term benefits.

Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies

OBJECTIVE

To review the published studies reporting various specimen retrieval incisions being used by colorectal surgeons in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections (LCR).

METHODS

Standard medical electronic databases were searched to find relevant articles and a summary conclusion was generated.

RESULTS

There were 43 studies reporting various approaches used for the purpose of specimen retrieval in 2388 patients undergoing LCR. The most common approaches were periumbilical midline incision (1260 reported case in the literature), transverse incision (583 reported cases in the literature) in the right- or left iliac fossa, depending on the side of colonic resection, and Pfannensteil incision (293 reported cases in the literature). Periumbilical midline incision was associated with the higher risk of developing incisional hernia (odds ratio 53.72; 95% confidence interval 7.48-386.04; Z = 3.96; P = 0.0001). In terms of surgical site infection (SSI), there was no difference between the three common approaches to specimen retrieval. Transanal and transvaginal approaches were associated with higher risk of SSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Midline, transverse and Pfannensteil incisions were the most commonly used approaches for specimen retrieval following LCR. Midline incision was associated with higher risk of incisional hernia. Risk of SSI was similar in all three common approaches. The transanal and transvaginal approaches pose a higher risk of SSI. These conclusions are based on the combined outcome of published case series, case reports and comparative studies. Randomized, controlled trials with longer follow-up are required before recommending the routine use of any approach for specimen retrieval in patients undergoing LCR.

Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery: an analysis of trends, outcomes, and risk factors over a 10-year period in the United States

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic ureteral injuries during colorectal surgical procedures are rare. Little is known about their incidence, associated outcomes, and predisposing factors.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the trends of iatrogenic ureteral injuries in the United States over a decade, as well as their outcomes and risk factors.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

SETTINGS

The nationwide inpatient sample from 2001 to 2010 was analyzed.

PATIENTS

Included were patients with colorectal cancer, benign polyps, diverticular disease, or inflammatory bowel disease undergoing colorectal surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Trends of iatrogenic ureteral injuries occurring in colon and rectal surgical procedures were examined over a 10-year period. Mortality, morbidity, length of stay and total charge associated with ureteral injuries were analyzed on multivariate analysis. Finally, a predictive model for ureteral injuries was built using patient, hospital, and operative variables.

RESULTS

An estimated 2,165,848 colorectal surgical procedures were performed in the United States over the study period, and 6027 ureteral injuries were identified (0.28%). The rate of ureteral injuries was higher in the second half of the decade (2006-2010) compared with the first half (2001-2005; 3.1/1000 vs 2.5/1000; p < 0.001). Ureteral injuries were independently associated with higher mortality (OR, 1.45; p < 0.05), morbidity (OR, 1.66; p < 0.001), longer length of stay (mean difference, 3.65 days; p < 0.001), and higher hospital charges by $31,497 (p< 0.001). Risk factors for ureteral injuries included rectal cancer (OR, 1.85), adhesions (OR, 1.83), metastatic cancer (OR, 1.76), weight loss/malnutrition (OR, 1.08), and teaching hospitals (OR, 1.05). Protective factors included the use of laparoscopy (OR, 0.91), transverse colectomy (OR, 0.90), and right colectomy (OR, 0.43).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study from an administrative database.

CONCLUSIONS

Iatrogenic ureteral injuries are rare complications in colorectal surgery; however, their incidence appears to be rising. Ureteral injuries are associated with higher mortality, morbidity, hospital charge, and length of stay, and their incidence can be predicted by several factors.

The role of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in subtotal and total colectomy for Crohn's colitis

BACKGROUND

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has gained wide clinical acceptance as a practical alternative to laparoscopically assisted surgery (LAP) for the surgical treatment of complex colorectal diseases (e.g., ulcerative colitis and diverticulitis). However, its role in the further challenging operation for Crohn's colitis (i.e., subtotal or total colectomy) has yet to be established. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential benefit of HALS subtotal and total colectomy for Crohn's colitis.

METHODS

The study reviewed 38 consecutive patients who underwent subtotal or total colectomy as their initial abdominal surgery for Crohn's extensive colitis (involvement of 3 or more colonic segments) between 1992 and 2006. The patients were divided into three groups (open, LAP, and HALS), and their background and postoperative data were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The reviews included 14 open, 6 LAP, and 18 HALS cases. The groups were comparable in terms of age at surgery, gender, body mass index, extent and type of disease, indications, and procedures. The median operative time was significantly longer for LAP (330 min; range, 154-540 min) than for HALS (251 min; range, 165-340 min) or open surgery (200 min; range, 172-315 min). The blood loss was significantly less with LAP (170 ml; range, 115-257 ml) and HALS (225 ml; range, 35-890 ml) than with open surgery (438 ml; range, 280-780 ml). No difference was seen in postoperative complications, and no mortality occurred in the series.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings showed that HALS subtotal and total colectomies are feasible and safe. The HALS procedure currently seems potentially beneficial for patients with extensive Crohn's colitis by reducing the operative time for laparoscopic surgery while retaining its less invasiveness.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review

AIM

This systematic review was performed to answer the question whether hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) can preserve the advantages of laparoscopic compared with open surgery in colorectal disease.

METHOD

Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases (Medline, Embase Cochrane) and cross-reference search. The database search, quality assessment and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. Outcome criteria were operative time, number of trocars used, conversion rate, incision length, blood loss, time to passage of flatus, use of analgesia, postoperative morbidity, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, number of lymph nodes and costs.

RESULTS

Out of 162 publications seven publications were selected for comprehensive review. Three randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four non-RCTs, comprising 571 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Because of heterogeneity, the data could not be pooled. The operative time was significantly longer in HALS in four of the seven studies (addition in median operative time of 13-81 min). The conversion rate varied from 0 to 10%. Two of the four reporting studies demonstrated a significantly shorter time to passage of flatus in HALS (averagely one day in advance). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in HALS in four of the seven studies (average gain between 2 and 4 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of laparoscopic surgery over open surgery while reducing some of the disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery (shorter operative time, lower conversion rates). Especially for indications in which an incision to extract the resection specimen is required, HALS provides an excellent treatment option.

Prospective randomized comparison of clinical results between hand-assisted laparoscopic and open splenectomies

BACKGROUND

Although some studies have compared laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS) in splenomegaly cases, no study has analyzed the differences between HALS and open splenectomy (OS). This study aimed to compare the HALS and OS techniques in splenomegaly cases.

METHODS

This prospective study included 27 patients undergoing splenectomy for splenic disorders at the Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty between February and October 2007. Open splenectomy was performed for 14 patients and HALS for the remaining 13 patients.

RESULTS

The end points compared included incision length, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drain output and duration, postoperative pain scores, length of postoperative hospitalization, and perioperative complications. The authors found benefits of HALS over OS for incision length, postoperative pain score, postoperative drain output and duration, and hospital stay. The main advantages of the HALS technique over OS were less postoperative pain (p = 0.0002), shorter hospital stay (p = 0.004), and shorter abdominal incision (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

For splenomegaly, HALS significantly facilitates the surgical procedure and reduces the hospital stay while maintaining the advantages of OS such as tactile sense as well as easy and atraumatic manipulation of enlarged spleens.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare short-term outcomes after hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. straight laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Eleven surgeons at five centers participated in a prospective, randomized trial of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sigmoid/left colectomy and total colectomy. The study was powered to detect a 30-minute reduction in operative time between hand-assisted laparoscopic and straight laparoscopic groups.

RESULTS

There were 47 hand-assisted patients (33 sigmoid/left colectomy, 14 total colectomy) and 48 straight laparoscopic patients (33 sigmoid/left colectomy, 15 total colectomy). There were no differences in the patient age, sex, body mass index, previous surgery, diagnosis, and procedures performed between the hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic groups. Resident participation in the procedures was similar for all groups. The mean operative time (in minutes) was significantly less in the hand-assisted laparoscopic group for both the sigmoid colectomy (175 +/- 58 vs. 208 +/- 55; P = 0.021) and total colectomy groups (time to colectomy completion, 127 +/- 31 vs. 184 +/- 72; P = 0.015). There were no apparent differences in the time to return of bowel function, tolerance of diet, length of stay, postoperative pain scores, or narcotic usage between the hand-assisted laparoscopic and straight laparoscopic groups. There was one (2 percent) conversion in the hand-assisted laparoscopic group and six (12.5 percent) in the straight laparoscopic group (P = 0.11). Complications were similar in both groups (hand-assisted, 21 percent vs. straight laparoscopic, 19 percent; P = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective, randomized study, hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulted in significantly shorter operative times while maintaining similar clinical outcomes as straight laparoscopic techniques for patients undergoing left-sided colectomy and total abdominal colectomy.

A single training center's experience with 200 consecutive cases of diverticulitis: can all patients be approached laparoscopically?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes for consecutive patients with diverticular disease who underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy.

METHODS

Data for this patient population were collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Between December 2001 and March 2007, 200 consecutive patients (93 men and 107 women) with an average age of 55 years were identified. All cases were managed by one of two colorectal surgeons. Of the 200 patients, 158 had recurrent diverticulitis, 20 had fistulas, 12 had abscesses, 8 had strictures, 1 had a mass, and 1 had a bleed. The mean operative time was 159 min, and the conversion rate was 8%. A total of 30 early postoperative complications occurred for 26 patients including wound infection (n = 9), ileus (n = 8), Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 3), urinary retention (n = 3), pelvic abscess (n = 2), deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 1) urinary tract infection (n = 1), anastomotic leak (n = 1), and small bowel obstruction (n = 1). Late complications experienced by 11 patients included Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 3), incisional hernia (n = 3), wound infection (n = 3), wound hematoma (n = 1), and intraabdominal hemorrhage (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors believe it is feasible to offer elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy to all patients with symptomatic diverticular disease despite preoperative risk factors.