1
|
Geng ZH, Zhou PH, Cai MY. Submucosal Tunneling Techniques for Tumor Resection. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:143-154. [PMID: 36375878 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The concept of third space endoscopy is based on the principle that the deeper layers of the gastrointestinal tract can be accessed by tunneling in the submucosal space and maintaining the integrity of the overlying mucosa. The mucosal flap safety valve enabled endoscopists to use submucosal space securely. The era of third space endoscopy started with peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia and has expanded to treat various other gastrointestinal disorders, such as mucosal lesions, submucosal tumors, extraluminal tumors, and refractory gastroparesis, Zenker diverticulum, and restoration of the completely obstructed esophageal lumen. Third space endoscopy rapidly emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional surgery. Many studies discovered that this technique is safe and effective with excellent outcomes. Our review focused on the indications, techniques, clinical management, and adverse events of submucosal tunneling techniques for tumor resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Han Geng
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping-Hong Zhou
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming-Yan Cai
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Godat S, Marx M, Caillol F, Robert M, Autret A, Bories E, Pesenti C, Ratone JP, Schoepfer A, Poizat F, Giovannini M. Benefit of radiofrequency ablation after widespread endoscopic resection of neoplastic Barrett's esophagus in daily practice. Ann Gastroenterol 2022; 35:34-41. [PMID: 34987286 PMCID: PMC8713341 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2021.0685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background High-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are now well-established indications for endoscopic resection (ER). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be combined with ER in case of flat or long-segment BE ablation. We report here our experience of complementary RFA after widespread ER of neoplastic BE in daily practice. Method We retrospectively reviewed data of 89 patients, treated between 2006 and 2013 by ER alone (group 1) or by ER combined with RFA (group 2). Results Fifty-five patients in group 1 (7F/48M, mean age 68 years) underwent widespread ER with eradication of residual non-dysplastic BE. Complete eradication of HGD/IMC and intestinal metaplasia (IM) was achieved in 32/32 (100%) and 48/55 (87.3%) patients, respectively. Thirty-four patients in group 2 (3F/31M, mean age 67 years) had a multimodal treatment strategy, with widespread ER followed by RFA. Mean Prague classification of BE in this group was significantly longer (C4.4M6.6 vs. C2.7M4.5, P<0.001). Complete eradication of HGD/IMC and non-dysplastic BE was confirmed in 26/27 (96.3%) and 20/34 (58.8%) patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups concerning adverse events (16.4% vs. 23.5%, P=0.58) or recurrence rate of HGD/IMC (9.1% vs. 14.7%, P=0.42). The mismatch rate between preoperative and final histological diagnosis was high in both groups, at 45.5% and 26.5%. Conclusions A combination of ER and RFA can treat significantly longer neoplastic BE than ER alone, with the same efficiency and safety. Widespread ER, in contrast, is the only method of obtaining a reliable histological diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Godat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland (Sébastien Godat, Mariola Marx, Maxime Robert, Alain Schoepfer)
| | - Mariola Marx
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland (Sébastien Godat, Mariola Marx, Maxime Robert, Alain Schoepfer)
| | - Fabrice Caillol
- Division of Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Fabrice Caillol, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Maxime Robert
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland (Sébastien Godat, Mariola Marx, Maxime Robert, Alain Schoepfer)
| | - Aurélie Autret
- Division of Biostatistics, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Aurélie Autret)
| | - Erwan Bories
- Division of Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Fabrice Caillol, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Christian Pesenti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Fabrice Caillol, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Jean Philippe Ratone
- Division of Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Fabrice Caillol, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Alain Schoepfer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland (Sébastien Godat, Mariola Marx, Maxime Robert, Alain Schoepfer)
| | - Flora Poizat
- Division of Pathology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Flora Poizat)
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Fabrice Caillol, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Y, Yan X, Huang Y, Nie D, Wang Y, Chang H, Zhang Y, Yao W, Li K. Efficacy of oral steroid gel in preventing esophageal stricture after extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:402-412. [PMID: 33492500 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08296-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Esophageal stricture is a distressing issue for patients with early esophageal cancer following extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and the current steroid-based approaches are unsatisfactory for stricture prophylaxis. We evaluated the efficacy of oral hydrocortisone sodium succinate and aluminum phosphate gel (OHA) for stricture prophylaxis after extensive ESD. METHODS Patients undergoing > 3/4 circumferential ESD were randomized to either the endoscopic loco-regional triamcinolone acetonide injection (ETI) plus oral prednisone group or the OHA group. The primary endpoint was incidence of esophageal stricture, and the secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and endoscopic balloon dilations (EBDs). RESULTS The incidence of esophageal stricture in OHA group (per-protocol analysis, 9.4%, 3/32; intention-to-treat analysis, 12.1%, 4/33) was significantly less than that of control group (per-protocol analysis, 35.5%, 11/31, P = 0.013; intention-to-treat analysis, 39.4%, 13/33, P = 0.011). Two sessions of EBD were necessary to release all strictures in the OHA group, while the similar EBDs (median 2, range 1-4) for 11 of the control. Operation-related AEs included infection (control vs. OHA group = 9.7% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.034), operation-related hypokalemia (19.4% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.278), perforation (3.2% vs. 3.1%), post-ESD hemorrhage (6.5% vs. 0%), and cardiac arrhythmia (0% vs. 6.3%). Steroid-related AEs included steroid-related hypokalemia (16.1% vs. 25%) and bone fracture (3.2% vs. 0%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that OHA was an independent protective factor for stricture (OR 0.079; 95%CI 0.011, 0.544; P = 0.01) and mucosal defect > 11/12 circumference was an independent risk factor (OR 49.91; 95%CI 6.7, 371.83; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS OHA showed significantly better efficacy in preventing esophageal stricture after > 3/4 circumferential ESD compared to ETI plus oral prednisone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiyang Zhang
- The Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiue Yan
- The Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Yonghui Huang
- The Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China.
| | - Dan Nie
- The Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Yingchun Wang
- The Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Chang
- The Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Yaopeng Zhang
- The Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Yao
- The Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Ke Li
- The Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ishihara R, Arima M, Iizuka T, Oyama T, Katada C, Kato M, Goda K, Goto O, Tanaka K, Yano T, Yoshinaga S, Muto M, Kawakubo H, Fujishiro M, Yoshida M, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H, Inoue H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc 2020; 32:452-493. [PMID: 32072683 DOI: 10.1111/den.13654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has developed endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines. These guidelines present recommendations in response to 18 clinical questions concerning the preoperative diagnosis, indications, resection methods, curability assessment, and surveillance of patients undergoing endoscopic resection for esophageal cancers based on a systematic review of the scientific literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryu Ishihara
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miwako Arima
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiro Iizuka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuneo Oyama
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Motohiko Kato
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Goda
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Goto
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kyosuke Tanaka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomonori Yano
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Manabu Muto
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Hisao Tajiri
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruhiro Inoue
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Progress on the Prevention of Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018; 2018:1696849. [PMID: 29686699 PMCID: PMC5857296 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1696849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely accepted as an effective, minimally invasive treatment for superficial esophageal cancers. However, esophageal stricture often occurs in patients with large mucosal defects after ESD. In this review, we discuss various approaches recently researched to prevent esophageal strictures after ESD. These approaches can be classified as pharmacological treatments, esophageal stent treatments, and tissue engineering approaches. Most of the preventive approaches still have their limitations and require further research. With the improvement of current therapies, ESD can be more widely utilized as a minimally invasive treatment with minimal complications.
Collapse
|
6
|
Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of Complete Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Barrett Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 52:210-216. [PMID: 28134635 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000000800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
GOALS To report the rate of eradication and recurrence of both neoplasia and intestinal mucosa and the rate of adverse events for complete endoscopic resection (CER) of Barrett esophagus (BE). BACKGROUND There is limited composite data on the clinical efficacy of CER of BE with high-grade dysplasia or neoplasia. STUDY We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies that reported the clinical outcome of patients with BE who underwent CER and had at least 15-month follow-up after the time of elimination of BE. Main outcome of interests were pooled estimated rates of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia and neoplasia, recurrence of intestinal metaplasia and neoplasia, and incidence of esophageal stricture, bleeding, and perforation. RESULTS We identified 8 studies reporting on 676 patients (high-grade dysplasia 54%) that met our criteria. Pooled estimated rates of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia and complete eradication of intestinal neoplasia were 85.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 79.4%-89.2%] and 96.6% (95% CI, 94.0%-98.1%), respectively, and rates of recurrence of intestinal metaplasia and recurrence of intestinal neoplasia were 15.7% (95% CI, 8.0%-28.4%) and 5.8% (95% CI, 3.9%-8.6%), respectively. Estimated incidences of adverse events were stricture 37.4 (95% CI, 24.4%-52.6%), bleeding 7.9% (95% CI, 4.4%-13.8%) and perforation 2.3% (95% CI, 1.3%-4.1%). CONCLUSIONS CER achieves an 85% complete eradication rate of BE with recurrent rate of neoplasia of 6%. Estimated rate of postprocedural stricture was 37.4%. On the basis of this high rate of adverse events and significant heterogeneity in the studies included, the present meta-analysis cannot endorse CER as sole therapy for BE.
Collapse
|
7
|
Shimamura Y, Iwaya Y, Goda K, Teshima CW. Endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus: What can we learn from the Western perspective? Dig Endosc 2018; 30:182-191. [PMID: 28816408 DOI: 10.1111/den.12950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia in Western countries has increased in the past several decades and, even in Eastern countries, it appears to be increasing. Endoscopic therapies are the first-line treatment for BE-related neoplasia; however, there is still no standardized treatment strategy. Most of the data have been published from Western countries where the ultimate goal of treatment is complete eradication of BE mucosa removing subtle synchronous lesions and preventing metachronous neoplasia. A multimodality approach that combines endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been widely accepted in the West. In contrast, the lack of access to RFA treatment in the East has meant that endoscopic resection is the only feasible option. There is a wide divergence in treatment strategies for BE-related neoplasia between the East and the West. It is very important to consider these basic differences in the context of the currently available evidence to date. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review the recent literature and to provide an overview of the endoscopic treatment options for BE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuto Shimamura
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yugo Iwaya
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kenichi Goda
- Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Christopher W Teshima
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abe S, Iyer PG, Oda I, Kanai N, Saito Y. Approaches for stricture prevention after esophageal endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86:779-791. [PMID: 28713066 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic resection of extensive esophageal lesions has become more common as endoscopic resection techniques and equipment have developed. However, extensive esophageal endoscopic resections can cause postoperative esophageal strictures, which have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients. We aimed to review current treatments and innovative approaches to prevent esophageal strictures after widespread endoscopic resection of esophageal lesions. METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature search from 2000 to 2016 using predetermined search terms to identify relevant articles and summarized their results as a narrative review. RESULTS A total of 21 original articles and case series were identified. A circumferential mucosal defect involving more than three fourths of the esophageal luminal circumference was the primary risk factor for developing an esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection. Oral and injectable steroid therapy demonstrated promise in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection esophageal strictures, with both strategies significantly reducing the number of required endoscopic balloon dilations. More data are needed on prophylactic self-expandable metal stents, local botulinum toxin injection, and oral tranilast as a strategy to prevent post-endoscopic submucosal dissection esophageal strictures. Although preliminary studies of tissue-shielding resection sites with polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue and autologous cell sheet transplantation have demonstrated promising results, additional larger validation studies are needed. CONCLUSIONS Oral and locally injected/administered steroids are first-line options for the prevention of esophageal strictures, but additional innovative solutions are being developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiichiro Abe
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Prasad G Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ichiro Oda
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuo Kanai
- Institute of Advanced Biomedical Engineering and Science, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fujii-Lau LL, Cinnor B, Shaheen N, Gaddam S, Komanduri S, Muthusamy VR, Das A, Wilson R, Simon VC, Kushnir V, Mullady D, Edmundowicz SA, Early DS, Wani S. Recurrence of intestinal metaplasia and early neoplasia after endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5:E430-E449. [PMID: 28573176 PMCID: PMC5451278 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-106578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conflicting data exist with regard to recurrence rates of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and dysplasia after achieving complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) patients. AIM (i) To determine the incidence of recurrent IM and dysplasia achieving CE-IM and (ii) to compare recurrence rates between treatment modalities [radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with or without endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) vs stepwise complete EMR (SRER)]. METHODS A systematic search was performed for studies reporting on outcomes and estimates of recurrence rates after achieving CE-IM. Pooled incidence [per 100-patient-years (PY)] and risk ratios with 95 %CI were obtained. Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses, decided a priori, were performed to explore heterogeneity in results. RESULTS A total of 39 studies were identified (25-RFA, 13-SRER, and 2 combined). The pooled incidence of any recurrence was 7.5 (95 %CI 6.1 - 9.0)/100 PY with a pooled incidence of IM recurrence rate of 4.8 (95 %CI 3.8 - 5.9)/100 PY, and dysplasia recurrence rate of 2.0 (95 %CI 1.5 - 2.5)/100 PY. Compared to the SRER group, the RFA group had significantly higher overall [8.6 (6.7 - 10.5)/100 PY vs. 5.1 (3.1 - 7)/100 PY, P = 0.01] and IM recurrence rates [5.8 (4.3 - 7.3)/100 PY vs. 3.1 (1.7 - 4)/100 PY, P < 0.01] with no difference in recurrence rates of dysplasia. Significant heterogeneity between studies was identified. The majority of recurrences were amenable to repeat endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). CONCLUSION The results of this study demonstrate that the incidence rates of overall, IM, and dysplasia recurrence rates post-EET are not inconsiderable and reinforce the importance of close surveillance after achieving CE-IM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Birtukan Cinnor
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Srinivas Gaddam
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Ananya Das
- Arizona Center for Digestive Health, Gilbert, AZ, USA
| | - Robert Wilson
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel Mullady
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Dayna S. Early
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA,Corresponding author Sachin Wani, MD Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CenterMail Stop F7351635 Aurora CourtRm 2.031AuroraCO 80045USA+1-720-848-2749
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yamashita DT, Li C, Bethune D, Henteleff H, Ellsmere J. Endoscopic mucosal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: a Canadian experience. Can J Surg 2017; 60:129-133. [PMID: 28338468 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.013515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is increasingly being used as a first-line treatment for Barrett esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC). We reviewed our experience with endoscopic treatment of BE with HGD and IMC at our institution with respect to eradication rates, complications and long-term recurrence. METHODS We performed a single-centre retrospective review of all patients referred between October 2010 and August 2014 for EMR with dysplastic BE or IMC. We performed EMR using a cap-fitted endoscope, and the procedure was repeated every 3 months until eradication or progression of disease. RESULTS A total of 28 patients were identified: 16 with dysplastic BE (14 HGD, 1 low-grade dysplasia, 1 intermediate dysplasia) and 12 with IMC. Complete eradication of HGD was achieved in 11 of 14 (79%) patients. Three of 12 (25%) patients initially referred with suspected IMC were found to have invasive adenocarcinoma on EMR. Eradication was successful in 8 of 9 (89%) patients with true IMC, with 1 patient progressing to salvage esophagectomy. Complications occurred in 2 of 28 (7%) patients; both had esophageal strictures managed with dilatation. Median duration of follow-up was 371 days. CONCLUSION Our experience supports the safety of EMR as a first-line treatment for patients with BE with dysplasia and IMC in early short-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Tami Yamashita
- From the Division of General, Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Yamashita, Li, Ellsmere); and the Division of Thoracic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Bethune, Henteleff)
| | - Chao Li
- From the Division of General, Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Yamashita, Li, Ellsmere); and the Division of Thoracic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Bethune, Henteleff)
| | - Drew Bethune
- From the Division of General, Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Yamashita, Li, Ellsmere); and the Division of Thoracic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Bethune, Henteleff)
| | - Harry Henteleff
- From the Division of General, Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Yamashita, Li, Ellsmere); and the Division of Thoracic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Bethune, Henteleff)
| | - James Ellsmere
- From the Division of General, Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Yamashita, Li, Ellsmere); and the Division of Thoracic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Bethune, Henteleff)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Efficacy and safety outcomes of multimodal endoscopic eradication therapy in Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85:482-495.e4. [PMID: 27670227 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Focal EMR followed by radiofrequency ablation (f-EMR + RFA) and stepwise or complete EMR (s-EMR) are established strategies for eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC)/intramucosal carcinoma (IMC). The objective of this study was to derive pooled rates of efficacy and safety of individual methods in a large cohort of patients with BE and to indirectly compare the 2 methods. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and major conference proceedings were searched. A systematic review and pooled analysis were carried out to determine the following outcomes in patients with BE undergoing either f-EMR + RFA or s-EMR: (1) complete eradication rates of neoplasia (CE-N) and intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM); (2) recurrence rates of cancer (EAC), dysplasia, and IM; (3) incidence rates of adverse events. Mixed logistic regression was performed as an exploratory analysis to examine differences in outcomes between the 2 methods. RESULTS Nine studies (774 patients) of f-EMR + RFA and 11 studies (751 patients) of s-EMR were included. Patients undergoing f-EMR + RFA had high BE eradication rates (CE-N, 93.4%; CE-IM, 73.1%), whereas strictures occurred in 10.2%, bleeding in 1.1%, and perforations in 0.2% of patients. Recurrence of EAC, dysplasia, and IM was 1.4%, 2.6%, and 16.1%, respectively, in this group. Patients undergoing s-EMR also showed high BE eradication rates (CE-N, 94.9%; CE-IM, 79.6%) but a higher rate of adverse events (strictures in 33.5%, bleeding in 7.5%, and perforation in 1.3%). Recurrence of EAC, dysplasia, and IM was 0.7%, 3.3%, and 12.1%, respectively, in the s-EMR group. Mixed logistic regression showed that patients undergoing s-EMR might be more likely to develop esophageal strictures (odds ratio [OR], 4.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-13.85; P = .005), perforation (OR, 7.00; 95% CI, 1.56-31.33; P = .01), and bleeding (OR, 6.88; 95% CI, 2.19-21.62; P = 0.001) compared with f-EMR + RFA. CONCLUSIONS In patients with HGD/EAC, f-EMR followed by RFA seems to be equally effective as and safer than s-EMR.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ratone JP, Bories E, Caillol F, Pesenti C, Godat S, Poizat F, Cassan CD, Giovannini M. Oral steroid prophylaxis is effective in preventing esophageal strictures after large endoscopic resection. Ann Gastroenterol 2016; 30:62-66. [PMID: 28042239 PMCID: PMC5198248 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2016.0085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Strictures are frequent complications of large endoscopic mucosal resections (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissections of the esophagus. Local or systemic steroid therapy has shown promise in the prevention of secondary stenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of systemic steroid therapy following endoscopic resection of at least hemi-circumferential esophageal mucosa. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study in a tertiary center. We evaluated patients who were treated with oral steroids between July 2013 and September 2015, after undergoing a large EMR for Barrett’s esophagus associated with dysplasia or carcinoma. The steroid protocol used was an initial dose of 30 mg prednisolone, tapered over 8 weeks. Exclusion criteria were a previous attempt at radiofrequency ablation or resection. Results Thirty-one patients (27 men) were analyzed: 13 with low-grade dysplasia Barrett’s esophagus, 16 with in situ adenocarcinoma, 1 with pT1SM1 adenocarcinoma, and 1 with pT1SM2 adenocarcinoma. Twenty-eight resections (28/31) were completed (R0) in 1-3 sessions (median 2), while 3 resections were R1. The median length of Barrett’s esophagus was C3M5 (range C0M2-C10M11) according to the Prague classification. The median follow up was 10 months (range 4-17), during which 4 patients (13%) developed a secondary stenosis. All stenoses were successfully treated by endoscopic dilation (range 1-4). No complications related to dilation or to the steroid therapy were observed. Conclusions Our rate of secondary stricture was lower than expected, given the rates of 17-88% in published studies. Systemic oral steroid therapy seems to be effective in reducing potential esophageal stenosis after EMR. Complementary randomized studies are required to confirm whether systemic steroids are an effective primary prophylaxis for esophageal stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Philippe Ratone
- Endoscopy Unit (Jean-Philippe Ratone, Erwan Bories, Fabrice Caillol, Christian Pesenti, Sebastien Godat, Chiara De Cassan, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Erwan Bories
- Endoscopy Unit (Jean-Philippe Ratone, Erwan Bories, Fabrice Caillol, Christian Pesenti, Sebastien Godat, Chiara De Cassan, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Fabrice Caillol
- Endoscopy Unit (Jean-Philippe Ratone, Erwan Bories, Fabrice Caillol, Christian Pesenti, Sebastien Godat, Chiara De Cassan, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Christian Pesenti
- Endoscopy Unit (Jean-Philippe Ratone, Erwan Bories, Fabrice Caillol, Christian Pesenti, Sebastien Godat, Chiara De Cassan, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Sebastien Godat
- Endoscopy Unit (Jean-Philippe Ratone, Erwan Bories, Fabrice Caillol, Christian Pesenti, Sebastien Godat, Chiara De Cassan, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Flora Poizat
- Pathology Unit (Flora Poizat), Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Chiara De Cassan
- Endoscopy Unit (Jean-Philippe Ratone, Erwan Bories, Fabrice Caillol, Christian Pesenti, Sebastien Godat, Chiara De Cassan, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Endoscopy Unit (Jean-Philippe Ratone, Erwan Bories, Fabrice Caillol, Christian Pesenti, Sebastien Godat, Chiara De Cassan, Marc Giovannini)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Macías-García F, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Update on management of Barrett's esophagus. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2016; 7:227-234. [PMID: 27158538 PMCID: PMC4848245 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2015] [Revised: 10/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common condition that develops as a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The significance of Barrett's metaplasia is that predisposes to cancer development. This article provides a current evidence-based review for the management of BE and related early neoplasia. Controversial issues that impact the management of patients with BE, including definition, screening, clinical aspects, diagnosis, surveillance, and management of dysplasia and early cancer have been assessed.
Collapse
|
14
|
Neoplastic Barrett’s oesophagus and long-term follow-up after endoscopic therapy: complete histological eradication of Barrett associated with high-grade dysplasia significantly decreases neoplasia relapse. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:5410-5418. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4898-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 03/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
15
|
Management of Barrett's esophagus: Screening to newer treatments. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO (ENGLISH EDITION) 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2016.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
16
|
Thoguluva Chandrasekar V, Vennalaganti P, Sharma P. Management of Barrett's esophagus: From screening to newer treatments. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO 2016; 81:91-102. [PMID: 26964773 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Accepted: 07/15/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus is a premalignant condition of the esophagus in which the squamous epithelium of the lower end of the esophagus is replaced with columnar epithelium. Since the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is on the rise, the major gastroenterology societies have come up with their recommendations for screening and surveillance. Specific factors like obesity, white race, age over 50 years, early age of onset of GERD, smoking and hiatal hernia have been identified as increasing the risk of Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma. The diagnosis requires both endoscopic identification of columnar-lined mucosa and histological confirmation with biopsy. Most medical societies recommend screening people with GERD and other risk factors with endoscopy, but other alternatives employing less invasive methods are currently being studied. Surveillance strategies vary depending on the endoscopic findings and the Seattle biopsy protocol with random 4-quadrant sampling is recommended. Biomarkers have shown promising results, but more studies are needed in the future. White light endoscopy is the standard practice, but other advanced imaging modalities have shown variable results and hence more studies are awaited for further validation. Endoscopic eradication techniques, including both resection and ablation, have shown good but variable results for treating dysplastic lesions confined to the mucosa. Resection procedures to remove visible lesions followed by ablation of the dysplastic mucosa have shown the best results with higher eradication rates and lower recurrence rates. Surgical management is reserved for lesions with sub-mucosal invasion and lymph node spread with increased risk of metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - P Vennalaganti
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas city, Missouri, EE. UU
| | - P Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas city, Missouri, EE. UU..
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Perrod G, Rahmi G, Pidial L, Camilleri S, Bellucci A, Casanova A, Viel T, Tavitian B, Cellier C, Clement O. Cell Sheet Transplantation for Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Porcine Model. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0148249. [PMID: 26930409 PMCID: PMC4773126 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 01/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Extended esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is highly responsible for esophageal stricture. We conducted a comparative study in a porcine model to evaluate the effectiveness of adipose tissue-derived stromal cell (ADSC) double cell sheet transplantation. Methods Twelve female pigs were treated with 5 cm long hemi-circumferential ESD and randomized in two groups. ADSC group (n = 6) received 4 double cell sheets of allogenic ADSC on a paper support membrane and control group (n = 6) received 4 paper support membranes. ADSC were labelled with PKH-67 fluorophore to allow probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopie (pCLE) monitoring. After 28 days follow-up, animals were sacrificed. At days 3, 14 and 28, endoscopic evaluation with pCLE and esophagography were performed. Results One animal from the control group was excluded (anesthetic complication). Animals from ADSC group showed less frequent alimentary trouble (17% vs 80%; P = 0.08) and higher gain weight on day 28. pCLE demonstrated a compatible cell signal in 4 animals of the ADSC group at day 3. In ADSC group, endoscopy showed that 1 out of 6(17%) animals developed a severe esophageal stricture comparatively to 100% (5/5) in the control group; P = 0.015. Esophagography demonstrated a decreased degree of stricture in the ADSC group on day 14 (44% vs 81%; P = 0.017) and day 28 (46% vs 90%; P = 0.035). Histological analysis showed a decreased fibrosis development in the ADSC group, in terms of surface (9.7 vs 26.1 mm²; P = 0.017) and maximal depth (1.6 vs 3.2 mm; P = 0.052). Conclusion In this model, transplantation of allogenic ADSC organized in double cell sheets after extended esophegeal ESD is strongly associated with a lower esophageal stricture’s rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Perrod
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Laboratoire imagerie de l’angiogenèse et plateforme d’imagerie du petit animal, UMR-S970, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Laboratory of biosurgical research, UMR-U633, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Laboratoire imagerie de l’angiogenèse et plateforme d’imagerie du petit animal, UMR-S970, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Laboratory of biosurgical research, UMR-U633, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Laetitia Pidial
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Laboratoire imagerie de l’angiogenèse et plateforme d’imagerie du petit animal, UMR-S970, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Sophie Camilleri
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Pathology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Bellucci
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Laboratoire imagerie de l’angiogenèse et plateforme d’imagerie du petit animal, UMR-S970, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Radiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Amaury Casanova
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Laboratoire imagerie de l’angiogenèse et plateforme d’imagerie du petit animal, UMR-S970, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Thomas Viel
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Laboratoire imagerie de l’angiogenèse et plateforme d’imagerie du petit animal, UMR-S970, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Tavitian
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Laboratoire imagerie de l’angiogenèse et plateforme d’imagerie du petit animal, UMR-S970, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Radiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Cellier
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Olivier Clement
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité, Laboratoire imagerie de l’angiogenèse et plateforme d’imagerie du petit animal, UMR-S970, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris cité Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Radiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Balmadrid B, Hwang JH. Endoscopic resection of gastric and esophageal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2015; 3:330-8. [PMID: 26510452 PMCID: PMC4650978 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gov050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2015] [Accepted: 08/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques have reduced the need for surgery in early esophageal and gastric cancers and thus has lessened morbidity and mortality in these diseases. ESD is a relatively new technique in western countries and requires rigorous training to reproduce the proficiency of Asian countries, such as Korea and Japan, which have very high complete (en bloc) resection rates and low complication rates. EMR plays a valuable role in early esophageal cancers. ESD has shown better en bloc resection rates but it is easier to master and maintain proficiency in EMR; it also requires less procedural time. For early esophageal adenocarcinoma arising from Barrett’s, ESD and EMR techniques are usually combined with other ablative modalities, the most common being radiofrequency ablation because it has the largest dataset to prove its success. The EMR techniques have been used with some success in early gastric cancers but ESD is currently preferred for most of these lesions. ESD has the added advantage of resecting into the submucosa and thus allowing for endoscopic resection of more aggressive (deeper) early gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Balmadrid
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joo Ha Hwang
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Singh A, Chak A. Advances in the management of Barrett's esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2015; 3:303-15. [PMID: 26486568 PMCID: PMC4650977 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gov048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2015] [Accepted: 08/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has markedly increased in the United States over the last few decades. Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the most significant known risk factor for this malignancy. Theoretically, screening and treating early BE should help prevent EAC but the exact incidence of BE and its progression to EAC is not entirely known and cost-effectiveness studies for Barrett’s screening are lacking. Over the last few years, there have been major advances in our understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis and endoscopic management of BE. These developments focus on early recognition of advanced histology and endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia. Advanced resection techniques now enable us to endoscopically treat early esophageal cancer. In this review, we will discuss these recent advances in diagnosis and treatment of Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajaypal Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Barret M, Beye B, Leblanc S, Beuvon F, Chaussade S, Batteux F, Prat F. Systematic review: the prevention of oesophageal stricture after endoscopic resection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 42:20-39. [PMID: 25982288 DOI: 10.1111/apt.13254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2015] [Revised: 02/28/2015] [Accepted: 04/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extensive endoscopic resections for the treatment of early oesophageal neoplasia can result in fibro-inflammatory strictures that require repeated interventions, which significantly alter the patients' quality of life. AIMS To review current evidence about the prevention of oesophageal strictures following endoscopic resections. METHODS Systematic search of PubMed and Embase from inception to March 2015 using appropriate keywords. All original publications in English were included, and articles on the treatment of oesophageal stricture were excluded. RESULTS Of the 461 hits, 62 studies were included in the analysis. Among the wound-protective strategies, polyglycolic acid sheets showed the most convincing evidence with a 37.5% stricture rate and excellent safety. Regenerative medicine, using cell sheets of autologous keratinocytes, resulted in a 25% stricture rate, although with cost and availability concerns. Among anti-proliferative treatment modalities, steroid treatment, either endoscopically injected triamcinolone in the resection wound or orally administered prednisolone, proved effective with an overall stricture rate of 13.5%, with safety concerns regarding late oesophageal perforations and infectious morbidity. Among mechanical treatment options, poorly effective and high-risk preventive balloon dilation tend to be replaced by prophylactic covered stent, with 18-28% stricture rates. CONCLUSIONS Although oral or locally injected steroids are promising options, no currently available technique is sufficiently efficient and devoid of significant safety concerns to recommend its routine use for the prevention of strictures after extensive endoscopic resection. Improving our knowledge in the mechanisms of oesophageal wound healing will guide the development of novel methods for stricture prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Barret
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,UI 1016, Faculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - B Beye
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,UI 1016, Faculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - S Leblanc
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - F Beuvon
- Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - S Chaussade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - F Batteux
- UI 1016, Faculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France.,Department of Immunology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - F Prat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,UI 1016, Faculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Konda VJA, Gonzalez Haba Ruiz M, Koons A, Hart J, Xiao SY, Siddiqui UD, Ferguson MK, Posner M, Patti MG, Waxman I. Complete endoscopic mucosal resection is effective and durable treatment for Barrett's-associated neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12:2002-10.e1-2. [PMID: 24732285 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2013] [Revised: 04/08/2014] [Accepted: 04/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) is treated by complete eradication of areas of BE by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). By using this approach, histologic analysis also can be performed. We investigated the effectiveness, safety, and durability of this approach, as well as its use in diagnosis after a single referral. METHODS We collected data from 107 patients who were referred to the Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics at the University of Chicago for BE (mean length, 3.6 cm) with suspected HGD or IMC, from August 2003 through December 2012. All patients underwent EMR and were followed up through January 2014 (mean follow-up time, 40.6 mo). The primary outcome was treatment efficacy (complete eradication of BE and associated neoplasia); secondary outcomes included safety, durability, and accuracy of diagnosis. RESULTS BE was eradicated completely by EMR in 80.4% (86 of 107) of patients based on intention-to-treat analysis, and in 98.8% (79 of 80) of patients based on per-protocol analysis. The diagnosis was changed for 25% of patients after EMR, including 4 cases that initially were diagnosed as HGD by biopsy analysis and subsequently were found to have evidence of submucosal invasion when EMR specimens were assessed. Strictures and symptomatic dysphagia developed in 41.1% and 37.3% of patients, respectively, with an average of 2.3 dilations required. Perforations occurred in 2 patients after EMR and in 1 patient after dilation. HGD and IMC recurred in 1 patient each; both were treated successfully with EMR. Based on pathology analysis of the most recently collected specimens, 71.6% of patients (53 of 74) were in complete remission from intestinal metaplasia and 100% were in complete remission from HGD (74 of 74) or cancer (74 of 74). CONCLUSIONS For patients with BE with HGD or neoplasia, complete EMR is an effective and durable treatment and is a relatively safe technique. Specimens collected by EMR also can be analyzed histologically to aid in diagnosis. The common complication of EMR is esophageal stricture, which can be addressed with endoscopic dilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vani J A Konda
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mariano Gonzalez Haba Ruiz
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ann Koons
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John Hart
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Shu-Yuan Xiao
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Uzma D Siddiqui
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark K Ferguson
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mitchell Posner
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Marco G Patti
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Irving Waxman
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chadwick G, Groene O, Markar SR, Hoare J, Cromwell D, Hanna GB. Systematic review comparing radiofrequency ablation and complete endoscopic resection in treating dysplastic Barrett's esophagus: a critical assessment of histologic outcomes and adverse events. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79:718-731.e3. [PMID: 24462170 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2013] [Accepted: 11/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With recent advances in endoscopy, endoscopic techniques have surpassed esophagectomy in the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of complete EMR and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of dysplastic BE. DESIGN Systematic review of literature. PATIENTS Diagnosis of BE with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer. INTERVENTION Complete EMR or RFA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia at the end of treatment and after >12 months' follow-up. Adverse event rates associated with treatment. RESULTS A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only 1 trial directly compared the 2 techniques; most studies were observational case series. Dysplasia was effectively eradicated at the end of treatment in 95% of patients after complete EMR and 92% after RFA. After a median follow-up of 23 months for complete EMR and 21 months for RFA, eradication of dysplasia was maintained in 95% of patients treated with complete EMR and 94% treated with RFA. Short-term adverse events were seen in 12% of patients treated with complete EMR but in only 2.5% of those treated with RFA. Esophageal strictures were adverse events in 38% of patients treated with complete EMR, compared with 4% of those treated with RFA. Progression to cancer appeared to be rare after treatment, although follow-up was short. LIMITATIONS Small studies, heterogeneous in design, with variable outcome measures. Also follow-up durations were short, limiting evaluation of long-term durability of both treatments. CONCLUSION RFA and complete EMR are equally effective in the short-term treatment of dysplastic BE, but adverse event rates are higher with complete EMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina Chadwick
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Groene
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Hoare
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Cromwell
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - George B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nakagawa K, Koike T, Iijima K, Shinkai H, Hatta W, Endo H, Ara N, Uno K, Asano N, Imatani A, Shimosegawa T. Comparison of the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109:348-56. [PMID: 24394751 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2013] [Accepted: 11/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Few studies have simultaneously evaluated the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) of the esophagus in Japan. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of ER for superficial esophageal cancer in consecutive patients. METHODS This was a retrospective study from a single institution. From April 2001 to June 2012, 204 patients with SCC and 26 patients with AC were included from a total of 355 consecutive patients who were treated by esophageal ER at the Tohoku University Hospital. Patients with submucosal invasion deeper than 200 μm and lymphovascular involvement were excluded. The intervention followed was endoscopic therapy. RESULTS Overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence rates were evaluated as long-term outcomes. In the SCC group, during the median observation time of 36.5 months (range, 6-120 months), 22 (10.8%) patients experienced metachronous recurrence, 4 (2.0%) patients experienced local recurrence, and 27 (13.2%) patients died from causes unrelated to SCC. In the AC group, during the median observation time of 45.5 months (range, 6-131 months), one patient (3.8%) experienced metachronous recurrence and two (7.7%) died from causes unrelated to AC. The cumulative 5-year overall survival rates were not significantly different between SCC (75.9%) and AC (88.9%) (P=0.120). The cumulative 5-year disease-free survival rates of SCC (57.1%) were significantly lower than those of AC (85.2%; P=0.017). The cumulative 5-year recurrence rates of SCC (32.0%) were significantly higher than those of AC (4.2%; P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS The rate of recurrence after ER was higher in patients with SCC than that in patients with AC. These findings suggest that, by detecting AC of the esophagus earlier, a satisfactory prognosis without recurrence can be expected after ER in Japan, and more rigorous endoscopic follow-up is necessary after ER in patients with SCC than in those with AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichiro Nakagawa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Koike
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Katsunori Iijima
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Hirohiko Shinkai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Waku Hatta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Endo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Ara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Kaname Uno
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Naoki Asano
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Akira Imatani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tooru Shimosegawa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Conio M, Fisher DA, Blanchi S, Ruggeri C, Filiberti R, Siersema PD. One-step circumferential endoscopic mucosal cap resection of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2014; 38:81-91. [PMID: 23856637 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2013.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2013] [Revised: 05/24/2013] [Accepted: 05/29/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Focal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of visible intraepithelial lesions arising within Barrett's esophagus (BE) may miss synchronous lesions that are not endoscopically apparent. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection would obviate this concern by removing all BE; however, it requires repeated endoscopy which may increase the risk of complications, particularly for patients with circumferential BE. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of one-step complete circumferential resection of BE by cap-assisted EMR (EMR-C) among patients with circumferential BE and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2003 and March 2010, 47 patients with circumferential BE and biopsy-proven high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer underwent EMR-C. We evaluated: (1) complete eradication of neoplasia, (2) complete eradication of metaplasia, and (3) complications including bleeding and esophageal stricture. RESULTS Complete eradication of neoplasia and complete eradication of metaplasia were achieved after a median follow-up of 18.4 months in 91% (43/47) of patients. After EMR-C, two patients (one IMC, one invasive cancer) underwent esophagectomy. Histology of the resected specimens showed no residual disease and a T1bN0 lesion, respectively. Two patients had progression of neoplasia. A stenosis occurred in 18 out of 45 patients (40%). All stenoses were treated with dilations and two required temporary placement of a covered stent. CONCLUSION One-step complete EMR-C is a safe and effective technique which can be considered in patients with early neoplastic lesions. Although 40% of patients developed dysphagia, this could well be managed endoscopically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Conio
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
| | - Deborah A Fisher
- Department of Gastroenterology, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke Medical Center, NC, USA
| | - Sabrina Blanchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital, Sanremo, Italy
| | | | - Rosa Filiberti
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS, San Martino - IST National Institute for Cancer Research, Genova, Italy
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Aranda-Hernandez J, Cirocco M, Marcon N. Treatment of dysplasia in barrett esophagus. Clin Endosc 2014; 47:55-64. [PMID: 24570884 PMCID: PMC3928493 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2014.47.1.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2013] [Revised: 12/27/2013] [Accepted: 12/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Barrett esophagus is recognized as a risk factor for the development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage with a 5-year survival rate of 15%. Most of these patients present de novo and are not part of a surveillance program. Endoscopic screening with improvement in recognition of early lesions may change this pattern. In the past, patients diagnosed with dysplasia and mucosal cancer were best managed by esophagectomy. Endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection and radiofrequency ablation have resulted in high curative rates and a shift away from esophagectomy. This pathway is supported by the literature review of esophagectomies performed for mucosal disease, as well as pathologists' interpretation of endoscopic mucosal specimens, which document the low risk of lymph node metastasis. The role of endoscopic therapy for superficial submucosal disease continues to be a challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Aranda-Hernandez
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Cirocco
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Norman Marcon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bronner MP. Barrett's Esophagus. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF HELICOBACTER AND UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL RESEARCH 2014. [DOI: 10.7704/kjhugr.2014.14.3.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary P. Bronner
- Division of Anatomic Pathology & Molecular Oncology, University of Utah and ARUP Laboratories, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K, Ang Y, Kang JY, Watson P, Trudgill N, Patel P, Kaye PV, Sanders S, O'Donovan M, Bird-Lieberman E, Bhandari P, Jankowski JA, Attwood S, Parsons SL, Loft D, Lagergren J, Moayyedi P, Lyratzopoulos G, de Caestecker J. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus. Gut 2014; 63:7-42. [PMID: 24165758 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 826] [Impact Index Per Article: 82.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
These guidelines provide a practical and evidence-based resource for the management of patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related early neoplasia. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument was followed to provide a methodological strategy for the guideline development. A systematic review of the literature was performed for English language articles published up until December 2012 in order to address controversial issues in Barrett's oesophagus including definition, screening and diagnosis, surveillance, pathological grading for dysplasia, management of dysplasia, and early cancer including training requirements. The rigour and quality of the studies was evaluated using the SIGN checklist system. Recommendations on each topic were scored by each author using a five-tier system (A+, strong agreement, to D+, strongly disagree). Statements that failed to reach substantial agreement among authors, defined as >80% agreement (A or A+), were revisited and modified until substantial agreement (>80%) was reached. In formulating these guidelines, we took into consideration benefits and risks for the population and national health system, as well as patient perspectives. For the first time, we have suggested stratification of patients according to their estimated cancer risk based on clinical and histopathological criteria. In order to improve communication between clinicians, we recommend the use of minimum datasets for reporting endoscopic and pathological findings. We advocate endoscopic therapy for high-grade dysplasia and early cancer, which should be performed in high-volume centres. We hope that these guidelines will standardise and improve management for patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia.
Collapse
|
28
|
Clermont MP, Chawla S, Woods KE, Keilin SA, Cai Q, Willingham FF. Impact of endoscopic mucosal resection in patients referred for endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus. GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gii.2013.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
29
|
Binmoeller KF, Shah JN, Bhat YM, Kane SD. "Underwater" EMR of sporadic laterally spreading nonampullary duodenal adenomas (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78:496-502. [PMID: 23642790 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.1330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2012] [Accepted: 03/13/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND EMR for the treatment of duodenal adenomas is challenging due to a thin wall and rich vascularity. OBJECTIVE To evaluate a novel technique of "underwater" EMR without prior submucosal injection for the removal of large (≥2 cm) laterally spreading nonampullary duodenal adenomas. DESIGN Prospective, observational study. SETTING Tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS Twelve patients (median age, 60 years) meeting the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS Piecemeal EMR technique after sterile water submersion when using a double-channel endoscope. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Technical success, adverse events, completeness of resection on follow-up endoscopy. RESULTS Median adenoma size was 35 mm (25% greater than one-half circumference, 50% equal to one-third to one-half circumference, and 25% less than one-third circumference). Median procedure time was 65 minutes (range, 32-151). Final histology was tubular adenoma (7), tubulovillous adenoma (1), villous adenoma (3), and high-grade dysplasia (1). Eleven patients (92%) met the primary endpoint (technical success) and all patients met the secondary endpoint (completeness of resection). Median interval until follow-up endoscopy was 16 weeks (range, 11-56). Adverse events were as follows: delayed bleeding (3 patients, of whom 2 required transfusions), water intoxication syndrome manifested by altered mental status and hyponatremia (1), and stricture formation (1) that responded to balloon dilation. No perforation or postresection abdominal pain was found. LIMITATIONS Single operator, single center, small sample size, limited follow-up. CONCLUSION Underwater EMR for large sessile duodenal adenomas has high success rates for complete removal. The risk of delayed bleeding is significant, and precautions are needed when infusing a large volume of fluid into the GI tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth F Binmoeller
- Paul May & Frank Stein Interventional Endoscopy Center, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94115, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Lang H. Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:1424-37. [PMID: 23539431 PMCID: PMC3602502 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i9.1424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2012] [Revised: 08/22/2012] [Accepted: 08/25/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate potential therapeutic recommendations for endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms.
METHODS: A thorough search of electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane Library, from 1997 up to January 2011 was performed. An analysis was carried out, pooling the effects of outcomes of 4241 patients enrolled in 80 retrospective studies. For comparisons across studies, each reporting on only one endoscopic method, we used a random effects meta-regression of the log-odds of the outcome of treatment in each study. “Neural networks” as a data mining technique was employed in order to establish a prediction model of lymph node status in superficial submucosal esophageal carcinoma. Another data mining technique, the “feature selection and root cause analysis”, was used to identify the most important predictors of local recurrence and metachronous cancer development in endoscopically resected patients, and lymph node positivity in squamous carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) separately in surgically resected patients.
RESULTS: Endoscopically resected patients: Low grade dysplasia was observed in 4% of patients, high grade dysplasia in 14.6%, carcinoma in situ in 19%, mucosal cancer in 54%, and submucosal cancer in 16% of patients. There were no significant differences between endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the following parameters: complications, patients submitted to surgery, positive margins, lymph node positivity, local recurrence and metachronous cancer. With regard to piecemeal resection, ESD performed better since the number of cases was significantly less [coefficient: -7.709438, 95%CI: (-11.03803, -4.380844), P < 0.001]; hence local recurrence rates were significantly lower [coefficient: -4.033528, 95%CI: (-6.151498, -1.915559), P < 0.01]. A higher rate of esophageal stenosis was observed following ESD [coefficient: 7.322266, 95%CI: (3.810146, 10.83439), P < 0.001]. A significantly greater number of SCC patients were submitted to surgery (log-odds, ADC: -2.1206 ± 0.6249 vs SCC: 4.1356 ± 0.4038, P < 0.05). The odds for re-classification of tumor stage after endoscopic resection were 53% and 39% for ADC and SCC, respectively. Local tumor recurrence was best predicted by grade 3 differentiation and piecemeal resection, metachronous cancer development by the carcinoma in situ component, and lymph node positivity by lymphovascular invasion. With regard to surgically resected patients: Significant differences in patients with positive lymph nodes were observed between ADC and SCC [coefficient: 1.889569, 95%CI: (0.3945146, 3.384624), P < 0.01). In contrast, lymphovascular and microvascular invasion and grade 3 patients between histologic types were comparable, the respective rank order of the predictors of lymph node positivity was: Grade 3, lymphovascular invasion (L+), microvascular invasion (V+), submucosal (Sm) 3 invasion, Sm2 invasion and Sm1 invasion. Histologic type (ADC/SCC) was not included in the model. The best predictors for SCC lymph node positivity were Sm3 invasion and (V+). For ADC, the most important predictor was (L+).
CONCLUSION: Local tumor recurrence is predicted by grade 3, metachronous cancer by the carcinoma in-situ component, and lymph node positivity by L+. T1b cancer should be treated with surgical resection.
Collapse
|
31
|
Koike T, Nakagawa K, Iijima K, Shimosegawa T. Endoscopic resection (endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection) for superficial Barrett's esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc 2013; 25 Suppl 1:20-8. [PMID: 23480400 DOI: 10.1111/den.12047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2012] [Accepted: 01/08/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Recently developed endoscopic resection (endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD]/ endoscopic mucosal resection) has dramatically changed the therapeutic approach for Barrett's esophageal cancer. The rationale for endoscopic resection is that lesions confined to the mucosal layer have negligible risk for developing lymph node metastasis and can be successfully eradicated by endoscopic treatment as a curative treatment with minimal invasiveness. According to some reports that analyzed the rate of lymph-node involvement relative to the depth of mucosal or submucosal tumor infiltration, endoscopic resection is clearly indicated for intramucosal carcinoma and might be extended to lesions with invasion into the submucosa (<200 μm, sm1) because of the low risk for lymph node metastasis. Most Japanese experts recommend ESD for Barrett's esophageal cancer after accurate diagnosis of the margin of cancer using narrow band imaging with magnifying endoscopy because of its high curative rate. However, few studies have evaluated the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for Barrett's esophageal cancer in Japan. Further investigations should be conducted to establish endoscopic resection for Barrett's esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Koike
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
The treatment of esophageal cancer has evolved considerably in the past decade and depends largely on the extent of disease at the time of presentation. For disease confined to the esophageal mucosa, endoscopic therapy is replacing esophagectomy as the standard of care. For locoregional disease, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy is the best strategy for optimizing long-term survival. In the minority of patents who present with metastatic disease, the prognosis is poor. Palliative therapies available for these patients include chemotherapy, radiation, endoscopic therapies to ameliorate obstruction or bleeding, and surgical intervention to optimize nutritional status or to relieve obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan R Nieman
- Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: advances in endoscopic techniques. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57:3055-64. [PMID: 22760590 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2279-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2012] [Accepted: 06/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a well-known premalignant condition that can be associated with the development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. In the past, esophagectomy was the standard treatment for patients with BE with high grade dysplasia (HGD) and early cancer (EC). However, esophagectomy is not necessarily the only treatment response to HGD and EC anymore. Over the past decade, a number of endoscopic therapies have been developed for management of BE. These include endoscopic mucosal resection, thermal ablation techniques that use laser irradiation, multipolar electrocoagulation, argon plasma coagulation, photodynamic therapy, and the recently developed cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation.
Collapse
|
34
|
Fabricated autologous epidermal cell sheets for the prevention of esophageal stricture after circumferential ESD in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76:873-81. [PMID: 22867446 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2012] [Accepted: 06/14/2012] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an accepted treatment for early esophageal carcinoma. However, resection of a large mucosal area, as with circumferential ESD, induces severe stricture formation. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of cultured autologous epidermal cell sheets to prevent severe esophageal constriction after circumferential ESD. DESIGN Animal study. SETTING University institute. INTERVENTION Eight pigs underwent circumferential esophageal ESD while under general anesthesia. In 4 pigs, fabricated autologous epidermal cell sheets were endoscopically transplanted to the central ESD sites immediately after the ESD. The other 4 pigs underwent circumferential ESD only. Necropsy and histological assessment were performed at 1 and 2 weeks post-ESD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Weight gain, degree of mucosal constriction, and histological assessments. RESULTS All pigs in the control group showed severe esophageal constriction after 2 weeks. The control and transplanted groups had weight gains of -10.3% and 0.3% (P = .03), respectively, and the mean degrees of constriction were 88% and 56% (P < .01), respectively. Early re-epithelialization and mild fibrosis in the muscularis were observed in the transplanted group. LIMITATIONS Animal study, small sample size. CONCLUSIONS Fabricated autologous skin epidermal cell sheets would be useful in preventing severe esophageal constriction after circumferential ESD.
Collapse
|
35
|
Konda VJ, Waxman I. Low risk of prevalent submucosal invasive cancer among patients undergoing esophagectomy for treatment of Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia. J Gastrointest Oncol 2012; 2:1-4. [PMID: 22811818 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2011.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2011] [Accepted: 02/06/2011] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vani Ja Konda
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
BENNETT CATHY, VAKIL NIMISH, BERGMAN JACQUES, HARRISON REBECCA, ODZE ROBERT, VIETH MICHAEL, SANDERS SCOTT, GAY LAURA, PECH OLIVER, LONGCROFT–WHEATON GAIUS, ROMERO YVONNE, INADOMI JOHN, TACK JAN, CORLEY DOUGLASA, MANNER HENDRIK, GREEN SUSI, DULAIMI DAVIDAL, ALI HAYTHEM, ALLUM BILL, ANDERSON MARK, CURTIS HOWARD, FALK GARY, FENNERTY MBRIAN, FULLARTON GRANT, KRISHNADATH KAUSILIA, MELTZER STEPHENJ, ARMSTRONG DAVID, GANZ ROBERT, CENGIA GIANPAOLO, GOING JAMESJ, GOLDBLUM JOHN, GORDON CHARLES, GRABSCH HEIKE, HAIGH CHRIS, HONGO MICHIO, JOHNSTON DAVID, FORBES–YOUNG RICKY, KAY ELAINE, KAYE PHILIP, LERUT TONI, LOVAT LAURENCEB, LUNDELL LARS, MAIRS PHILIP, SHIMODA TADAKUZA, SPECHLER STUART, SONTAG STEPHEN, MALFERTHEINER PETER, MURRAY IAIN, NANJI MANOJ, POLLER DAVID, RAGUNATH KRISH, REGULA JAROSLAW, CESTARI RENZO, SHEPHERD NEIL, SINGH RAJVINDER, STEIN HUBERTJ, TALLEY NICHOLASJ, GALMICHE JEAN, THAM TONYCK, WATSON PETER, YERIAN LISA, RUGGE MASSIMO, RICE THOMASW, HART JOHN, GITTENS STUART, HEWIN DAVID, HOCHBERGER JUERGEN, KAHRILAS PETER, PRESTON SEAN, SAMPLINER RICHARD, SHARMA PRATEEK, STUART ROBERT, WANG KENNETH, WAXMAN IRVING, ABLEY CHRIS, LOFT DUNCAN, PENMAN IAN, SHAHEEN NICHOLASJ, CHAK AMITABH, DAVIES GARETH, DUNN LORNA, FALCK–YTTER YNGVE, DECAESTECKER JOHN, BHANDARI PRADEEP, ELL CHRISTIAN, GRIFFIN SMICHAEL, ATTWOOD STEPHEN, BARR HUGH, ALLEN JOHN, FERGUSON MARKK, MOAYYEDI PAUL, JANKOWSKI JANUSZAZ. Consensus statements for management of Barrett's dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a Delphi process. Gastroenterology 2012; 143:336-46. [PMID: 22537613 PMCID: PMC5538857 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 271] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2011] [Revised: 03/26/2012] [Accepted: 04/06/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is increasingly common among patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aimed to provide consensus recommendations based on the medical literature that clinicians could use to manage patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or early-stage EA. METHODS We performed an international, multidisciplinary, systematic, evidence-based review of different management strategies for patients with BE and dysplasia or early-stage EA. We used a Delphi process to develop consensus statements. The results of literature searches were screened using a unique, interactive, Web-based data-sifting platform; we used 11,904 papers to inform the choice of statements selected. An a priori threshold of 80% agreement was used to establish consensus for each statement. RESULTS Eighty-one of the 91 statements achieved consensus despite generally low quality of evidence, including 8 clinical statements: (1) specimens from endoscopic resection are better than biopsies for staging lesions, (2) it is important to carefully map the size of the dysplastic areas, (3) patients that receive ablative or surgical therapy require endoscopic follow-up, (4) high-resolution endoscopy is necessary for accurate diagnosis, (5) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surveillance, (6) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surgery, (7) the combination of endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation is the most effective therapy, and (8) after endoscopic removal of lesions from patients with HGD, all areas of BE should be ablated. CONCLUSIONS We developed a data-sifting platform and used the Delphi process to create evidence-based consensus statements for the management of patients with BE and early-stage EA. This approach identified important clinical features of the diseases and areas for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - NIMISH VAKIL
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | - ROBERT ODZE
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - LAURA GAY
- Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - JAN TACK
- Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - SUSI GREEN
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | - HAYTHEM ALI
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS trust, Maidstone, UK
| | | | - MARK ANDERSON
- City Hospital, Birmingham, UK and Sandwell Hospital, West Midlands, UK
| | | | - GARY FALK
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | - ROBERT GANZ
- Bloomington Medical Centre, Bloomington, Minnesota
| | | | | | - JOHN GOLDBLUM
- Anatomic Pathology, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - PHILIP KAYE
- Digestive Diseases Centre, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - LARS LUNDELL
- Karolinska Institutet, CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - KRISH RAGUNATH
- Digestive Diseases Centre, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - NEIL SHEPHERD
- Gloucestershire Royal Hospitals, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - RAJVINDER SINGH
- Lyell McEwin Hosptial, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | - JEAN–PAUL GALMICHE
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU and University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | | | - LISA YERIAN
- Anatomic Pathology, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - THOMAS W. RICE
- Anatomic Pathology, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - JOHN HART
- University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - STUART GITTENS
- ECD Solutions, PO Box 862, Bridgetown, St. Michael, Barbados
| | - DAVID HEWIN
- Gloucestershire Royal Hospitals, Gloucestershire, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - PRATEEK SHARMA
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas
| | | | | | | | - CHRIS ABLEY
- University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - NICHOLAS J. SHAHEEN
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - AMITABH CHAK
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - LORNA DUNN
- Northern Oesophagogastric Cancer Unit Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - S. MICHAEL GRIFFIN
- Northern Oesophagogastric Cancer Unit Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - HUGH BARR
- Gloucestershire Royal Hospitals, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - JOHN ALLEN
- University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | - JANUSZ A. Z. JANKOWSKI
- University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK,Queen Mary University London, London, UK,University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Endotherapy is now the mainstay of therapy for Barrett's associated neoplasia. The approach should begin with confirmation of neoplasia by a gastrointestinal pathologist, patient counseling, and appropriate endoscopic work up. Detailed examination with high-resolution white light endoscopy is the most important tool for detection of neoplasia. Further validation studies are needed for many enhanced imaging modalities before being recommended as part of the standard work up and assessment of patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). Endoscopic mucosal resection is required for any visible lesion in the setting of dysplasia for accurate histological diagnosis. The remainder of the epithelium may be treated with resection or ablative therapy, followed by adequate surveillance. Patients with nondysplastic Barrett's require further risk stratification before incorporation of ablative therapy for this population. The future will fortify the endoscopic role in Barrett's with validation trials for endoscopic assessment, further long-term results for each of the treatment modalities, potential risk stratification for patients with BE, and improved guidelines for surveillance after therapy.
Collapse
|
38
|
Konda VJ, Dalal K. Optimal management of Barrett's esophagus: pharmacologic, endoscopic, and surgical interventions. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2011; 7:447-58. [PMID: 22162921 PMCID: PMC3233528 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s23425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal adenocarcinoma and its precursor, Barrett’s esophagus, are rapidly rising in incidence. This review serves to highlight the role of pharmacologic, endoscopic, and surgical intervention in the management of Barrett’s esophagus, which requires acid suppression and endoscopic assessment. Treatment with a proton pump inhibitor may decrease acid exposure and delay the progression to dysplasia. Patients who require aspirin for cardioprotection or other indications may also benefit in terms of a protective effect against the development of esophageal cancer. However, without other indications, aspirin is not indicated solely to prevent cancer. A careful endoscopic examination should include assessment of any visible lesions in a Barrett’s segment. An expert gastrointestinal pathologist should confirm neoplasia in the setting of Barrett’s esophagus. For those patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma, careful consideration of endoscopic therapy or surgical therapy must be given. All visible lesions in the setting of dysplasia should be targeted with focal endoscopic mucosal resection for both accurate histopathologic diagnosis and treatment. The remainder of the Barrett’s epithelium should be eradicated to address all synchronous and metachronous lesions. This may be done by tissue acquiring or nontissue acquiring means. Radiofrequency ablation has a positive benefit-risk profile for flat Barrett’s esophagus. At this time, endoscopic therapy is not indicated for nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. Esophagectomy is still reserved for selected cases with evidence of lymph node metastasis, unsuccessful endoscopic therapy, or with high-risk features of high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vani Ja Konda
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Efficacy and safety of EMR to completely remove Barrett's esophagus: experience in 41 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74:761-71. [PMID: 21824611 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2011] [Accepted: 06/14/2011] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND EMR is typically used to remove focal abnormalities of the esophageal mucosa. However, larger areas of Barrett's esophagus (BE) can be resected through side-by-side resections. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of EMR to completely remove BE. DESIGN Retrospective, single-center study. SETTING University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. PATIENTS Between January 2006 and December 2010, 46 patients underwent EMR for complete removal of BE. Three were lost to follow-up, one died of unrelated causes before completion, and one was still undergoing EMR treatment at the conclusion of the study. The remaining 41 patients were included for analysis. The worst histologic grade was low-grade dysplasia in 4 patients, high-grade dysplasia without cancer in 26 patients, and high-grade dysplasia with superficial adenocarcinoma in 11 patients. BE was circumferential in 65.9% of cases, and the mean (± SD) length was 3.3 ± 2.3 cm. INTERVENTION EMR was performed by using a cap (n = 4), a multiband ligator device (n = 31), or both (n = 6), with a mean (± SD) of 2.4 ± 1.2 sessions per patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Remission rates and complications. RESULTS Remission of high-grade dysplasia and cancer, all dysplasia, and all BE was achieved in 94.6%, 85.4%, and 78.0%, respectively. Complications included minor bleeding (31.7%), perforations (4.9%), and strictures (43.9%). All complications were managed conservatively. LIMITATIONS Retrospective design. CONCLUSION Complete removal of BE with EMR is effective but associated with a high complication rate, which is mainly related to stricture formation. This needs to be considered when choosing between available treatment modalities.
Collapse
|
40
|
Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo J, Parra-Blanco A, García-Varona A, Rodríguez-Peláez M, Madrigal-Hoyos E, Waxman I, Rodrigo L. Endoscopic resection techniques and ablative therapies for Barrett’s neoplasia. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 3:171-82. [PMID: 21954414 PMCID: PMC3180609 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i9.171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2010] [Revised: 07/04/2011] [Accepted: 08/15/2011] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal adenocarcinoma is the most rapidly increasing cancer in western countries. High-grade dysplasia (HGD) arising from Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the most important risk factor for its development, and when it is present the reported incidence is up to 10% per patient-year. Adenocarcinoma in the setting of BE develops through a well known histological sequence, from non-dysplastic Barrett’s to low grade dysplasia and then HGD and cancer. Endoscopic surveillance programs have been established to detect the presence of neoplasia at a potentially curative stage. Newly developed endoscopic treatments have dramatically changed the therapeutic approach of BE. When neoplasia is confined to the mucosal layer the risk for developing lymph node metastasis is negligible and can be successfully eradicated by an endoscopic approach, offering a curative intention treatment with minimal invasiveness. Endoscopic therapies include resection techniques, also known as tissue-acquiring modalities, and ablation therapies or non-tissue acquiring modalities. The aim of endoscopic treatment is to eradicate the whole Barrett’s segment, since the risk of developing synchronous and metachronous lesions due to the persistence of molecular aberrations in the residual epithelium is well established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacobo Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo
- Jacobo Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo, Adolfo Parra-Blanco, Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Central University Hospital of Asturias, Celestino Villamil S/N, Oviedo 33006, Asturias, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Preemptive dilatation gives good outcome to early esophageal stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011; 20:e25-7. [PMID: 20173605 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e3181c922a7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is gaining popularity over endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of superficial upper gastrointestinal cancers. It allows a more controlled en-bloc resection of intramucosal neoplasia allowing larger lesion in both stomach and esophagus to be resected. Lower local recurrence rate can be achieved. This is particularly important in the esophagus, as luminal stricture and deep fibrosis often hinder the possibility of repeat endoscopic resection of recurrences. The exact incidence of benign luminal strictures after the ESD of the esophagus lesion is unknown, but the risk is related to the circumferential extent of the lesion being resected, which is expected to develop in cases with post-ESD ulcer more than two-thirds of the circumference. We report 2 patients with early stenosis after circumferential ESD. We have also showed that scheduled early regular endoscopic balloon dilatation was effective in controlling and preventing post-ESD stricture. In conclusion, we suggest early follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy to be done for patients with circumferential ESD to determine the need of preemptive dilatation.
Collapse
|
42
|
Vienne A, Prat F. [Endoscopic treatments for Barrett oesophagus]. Presse Med 2011; 40:516-28. [PMID: 21474270 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2011.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2011] [Accepted: 02/07/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
High grade dysplasia and superficial carcinomas (with no extension under muscularis mucosae) can be indications for endoscopic treatments of Barrett oesophagus. When an endoscopic treatment is considered, a gastroscopy with use of acetic acid and planimetry and the confirmation of high-grade dysplasia by a new examination after PPI treatment and a pathologic second confirmation is needed. For high-grade dysplasia in focalised and visible lesions, an endoscopic resection by EMR or ESD should be proposed: it allows a more accurate pathologic examination and can be an effective curative treatment. After endoscopic resection of visible high grade dysplasia lesions, a complete eradication of Barrett oesophagus may be proposed to prevent dysplasia recurrence. In case of extensive high-grade dysplasia or to eradicate Barrett oesophagus residual lesions, radiofrequency ablation is the preferred endoscopic technique. Photodynamic therapy may also be proposed for more invasive lesions or after other endoscopic techniques with mucosal scars. Surgical oesophagus resection is still recommended for diffuse high-grade dysplasia in young patients or in case of pathologic pejorative criteria in endoscopic resection specimen. In case of Low-grade dysplasia, either endoscopic surveillance should be performed every six or 12 months or radiofrequency ablation could be proposed in the yield of prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Vienne
- Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital Cochin, service de gastro-entérologie, 75014 Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Both stepwise radical endoscopic resection (SRER) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are effective endoscopic strategies for the treatment of patients with flat, dysplastic Barrett esophagus. Findings from a randomized, controlled trial indicate that the two treatments have similar efficacy, but considerably more complications are associated with SRER compared with RFA.
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus is an acquired metaplastic abnormality in which the normal stratified squamous epithelium lining of the esophagus is replaced by an intestinal-like columnar epithelium. While in itself a benign and asymptomatic disorder, the clinical importance of this relatively common condition relates to its role as a precursor lesion to esophageal adenocarcinoma, the incidence of which has dramatically increased in Western populations in recent years. Although known to arise as a consequence of chronic gastroesophageal reflux, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying development Barrett's esophagus and its progression to cancer remain unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne A Phillips
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hudson M, Lin CL, Habr F. Current state of endoscopic therapies in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer. Hosp Pract (1995) 2011; 39:170-80. [PMID: 21441773 DOI: 10.3810/hp.2011.02.388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition that predisposes patients to esophageal adenocarcinoma. This risk increases with increasing dysplasia, especially in patients with BE and high-grade dysplasia. Radical esophagectomy had long been the only option for these patients; however, it has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic therapies have been increasingly used as an alternative to radical esophagectomy given the minimally invasive nature and tolerability of the procedure relative to surgery. Currently, the most widely used endoscopic therapies include endoscopic mucosal resection, photodynamic therapy, CryoSpray ablation, and radiofrequency ablation. Retrospective and prospective studies on the use of each of these modalities in patients with nondysplastic BE, dysplastic BE, and early esophageal cancer have demonstrated their effectiveness in eradication of dysplasia with or without reversion of Barrett's epithelium to normal squamous epithelium of the esophagus. These modalities are well tolerated, safe, and have few side effects. Ultimately, more research is needed regarding their ability to fully displace surgical intervention as the gold standard, although at this point their role in poor operative candidates or patients seeking conservative approaches remains promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Hudson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Warren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Badylak SF, Hoppo T, Nieponice A, Gilbert TW, Davison JM, Jobe BA. Esophageal preservation in five male patients after endoscopic inner-layer circumferential resection in the setting of superficial cancer: a regenerative medicine approach with a biologic scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A 2011; 17:1643-50. [PMID: 21306292 DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
As a result of injury caused by chronic gastroesophageal reflux, Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma are rapidly increasing problems in the United States. The current standard of care involves esophagectomy, a procedure associated with a high morbidity, a negative impact on long term quality of life, and a mortality rate of 1-6 percent. An entirely endoscopic technique for circumferential, long segment en bloc removal of the mucosa and submucosa with subsequent placement of a biologic scaffold material that promotes a constructive remodeling response and minimizes stricture is described herein. The results of this approach are reported for five patients with 4-24-month follow-up. Restoration of normal mature, K4+/K14+, squamous epithelium, and return to a normal diet without significant dysphagia is reported for all patients. Two of five patients show a small focus of recurrent Barrett's esophagus at the gastroesophageal junction, but the entire length and circumference of the reconstituted esophageal mucosa remains free of disease. This experience provides evidence that a regenerative medicine approach may, for the first time, enable aggressive endoscopic resection of early stage neoplasia without the need for esophagectomy and its associated complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen F Badylak
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
SPECHLER STUARTJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, Inadomi JM, Shaheen NJ. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2011; 140:e18-52; quiz e13. [PMID: 21376939 PMCID: PMC3258495 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 773] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
48
|
Fernández-Esparrach G, Rodríguez-D'Jesús A. [Radiofrequency in the treatment of Barrett's esophagus]. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2011; 34:35-40. [PMID: 21216043 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2010.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2010] [Accepted: 10/21/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Currently, there is ample evidence that endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and related neoplasms is safe and effective, suggesting that this approach should be preferred to esophagectomy in selected patients. Among new endoscopic tools, radiofrequency ablation is the latest to be developed. Due to its simplicity, effectiveness and safety, this technique may change the management of patients with BE since it appears to be effective not only in removing dysplasia but also in completely eradicating all Barrett's mucosa in most treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
- Unidad de Endoscopia, Servicio de Gastroenterología, ICMDiM, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, CIBERehd, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chennat J, Konda VJA, Waxman I. Endotherapy for Barrett's esophagus: Which, how, when, and who? Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2011; 21:119-33. [PMID: 21112502 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Recent developments in endoscopic therapeutic options for Barrett's esophagus (BE) early neoplasia have resulted in a dramatic paradigm shift in its clinical management. With multiple endoscopic choices available, it is important to discern subtle differences between these approaches based on the available current data and known limitations of each modality. The goals of endoscopic therapy of Barrett's neoplasia are to preserve the esophagus while ablating or removing the entire BE segment. This article reviews the currently available BE endoscopic treatments with emphasis on appropriate selection of patients, indications and timing of use, and clinical management considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Chennat
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, 5758 South Maryland Avenue, MC 9028, Chicago, IL 60637-1463, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Endoscopic resection (ER) has become the most important endoscopic treatment method of early cancers of the upper GI tract. ER serves as a therapeutic but also as a diagnostic tool by providing a specimen for histologic assessment. In expert hands ER is easy to performe and has a very low complication rate. Long-term results in early esophageal and gastric cancer are excellent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pech
- Department of Internal Medicine 2, HSK Wiesbaden, Ludwig-Erhard-Strasse 100, 65199, Wiesbaden, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|