Intraoperative ultrasonography during planned liver resections: why are we still performing it?

Current role of intraoperative ultrasonography in hepatectomy

Hepatectomy had a high mortality rate in the previous decade because of inadequate techniques, intraoperative blood loss, liver function reserve misdiagnoses, and accompanying postoperative complications. However, the development of several modalities, including intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS), has made hepatectomy safer. IOUS can provide real-time information regarding the tumor position and vascular anatomy of the portal and hepatic veins. Systematic subsegmentectomy, which leads to improved patient outcomes, can be performed by IOUS in open and laparoscopic hepatectomy. Although three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging have been widely used, IOUS and contrast-enhanced IOUS are important modalities for risk analyses and making decisions regarding resectability and operative procedures because of the vital anatomical information provided and high sensitivity for liver tumors, including "disappearing" liver metastases. Intraoperative color Doppler ultrasonography can be used to delineate the vascular anatomy and evaluate the blood flow volume and velocity in hepatectomy patients and recipients of deceased- and living-donor liver transplantation after vessel reconstruction and liver positioning. For liver surgeons, IOUS is an essential technique to perform highly curative hepatectomy safely, although recent advances have also been made in virtual modalities, such as real-time virtual sonography with 3D visualization.

Up-to-date intraoperative computer assisted solutions for liver surgery

Computer assisted surgical planning allowed for a better selection of patients, evaluation of operative strategy, appropriate volumetric measurements, identification of anatomical risks, definition of tumour resection margins and choice of surgical approach in liver oncologic resections and living donor liver transplantations. Although preoperative computer surgical analysis has been widely used in daily clinical practice, intraoperative computer assisted solutions for risk analysis and navigation in liver surgery are not widely available or still under clinical evaluation. Computer science technology can efficiently assist modern surgeons during complex liver operations, mainly by providing image guidance with individualized 2D images and 3D models of the various anatomical and pathological structures of interest. Intraoperative computer assisted liver surgery is particularly useful in complex parenchyma-sparing hepatectomies, for intraoperative risk analysis and for the effective treatment of colorectal metastases after neoadjuvant therapy or when they are multiple. In laparoscopic liver surgery, intraoperative computer aid is definitively more important as, apart from a restricted field of view, there is also loss of the fine haptic feedback. Intraoperative computer assisted developments face challenges that prevent their application in daily clinical practice. There is a vast variety of studies regarding intraoperative computer assisted liver surgery but there are no clear objective measurements in order to compare them and select the most effective solutions. An overview of up-to-date intraoperative computer assisted solutions for liver surgery will be discussed.

Manganese-enhanced MRI for the detection of metastatic potential in colorectal cancer

Background

To study manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) expression, manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI) appearance and its relation to metastatic potential in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

CRC cells SW620, HCT116, LoVo, SW480, DLD-1, HCT15, Caco-2 and their normal counterpart CCD841 CoN were chosen, based on differential aggressiveness, to undergo Western blot analysis for assessment of MnSOD expression, reported as proportion of readings to internal reference (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase). Based on the results of the invasion assay, HCT15, DLD-1, LoVo and SW620 cells and corresponding xenografts underwent MEMRI. The differences of average T1-value shortening were compared.

Results

MnSOD expression in SW620, HCT116, LoVo, SW480, DLD-1, HCT15, Caco-2 and CCD841 CoN cells (0.255 ± 0.018 (mean ± standard deviation), 0.289 ± 0.028, 0.438 ± 0.028, 0.337 ± 0.025, 0.777 ± 0.031, 1.045 ± 0.038, 0.163 ± 0.035 and 0.185 ± 0.038, respectively) was not correlated with Invasion Index (22.6 ± 0.7, 17.0 ± 0.6, 20.9 ± 0.6, 9.7 ± 0.4, 7.5 ± 0.3, 8.3 ± 0.2, 12.6 ± 0.5 and 0) (r = − 0.204, p = 0.627). In highly aggressive cells (SW620, LoVo), T1 shortening (289.33 ± 0.57, 268.45 ± 6.87 ms, respectively) was greater than that in lower counterparts (148.68 ± 3.99 ms in DLD-1, 128.60 ± 1.96 in HCT15) (p < 0.001). Both 5- and 10-mm group SW620 and/or LoVo tumours showed greater T1 shortening (≥600 ms) than DLD-1 and HCT15 (≤350 ms) (p < 0.001, p = 0.005, p = 0.010).

Conclusions

MEMRI has the potential to noninvasively distinguish different metastatic potential CRCs. However, the MnSOD expression is not correlated to malignant potential in CRC cells.

FIRST BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON MULTIMODAL TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES. MODULE 1: PRE-TREATMENT EVALUATION

Background

: Liver metastases of colorectal cancer are frequent and potentially fatal event in the evolution of patients with these tumors.

Aim

: In this module, was contextualized the clinical situations and parameterized epidemiological data and results of the various treatment modalities established.

Method:

Was realized deep discussion on detecting and staging metastatic colorectal cancer, as well as employment of imaging methods in the evaluation of response to instituted systemic therapy.

Results

: The next step was based on the definition of which patients would have their metastases considered resectable and how to expand the amount of patients elegible for modalities with curative intent.

Conclusion

: Were presented clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors, validated to be taken into account in clinical practice.

Feasibility of Routine Application of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Combination with Diffusion-Weighted MRI for the Preoperative Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination with diffusion-weighted MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI) has become popular for evaluating colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This retrospective observational study aimed to determine whether this procedure should be indicated prior to hepatectomy in all patients with CRLM.

METHODS

A retrospective survey of relevant data of patients who had undergone hepatectomy for CRLM from 2008 to 2014 was performed. The rates of detection by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI were evaluated. In addition, relapse-free and overall survivals after primary hepatectomy were compared between patients who had undergone only CE-CT versus those who had undergone both CE-CT and Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI.

RESULTS

In all, 419 pathologically confirmed CRLM were resected in 202 hepatectomies in 177 patients. The sensitivity of detection of CRLM was 77 % for CE-CT and 93 % for Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI (P < 0.01). The sensitivity of detection of 1-5, 6-10, and 11-15 mm CRLM by CE-CT was 9.6 % (5/52), 47 % (26/55), and 76 % (57/75), respectively, whereas that by Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI was 54 % (28/52), 91 % (50/55), and 99 % (74/75), respectively; these differences are significant (P < 0.01 for all three groups). Relapse-free (P = 0.99) and overall survival (P = 0.79) did not differ significantly between 37 patients evaluated preoperatively by only CE-CT and 168 patients evaluated by both CE-CT and Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI.

CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI detects small CRLM (≤15 mm) with higher sensitivity than CE-CT. However, whether Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI should be a routine component of preoperative evaluation remains unclear in terms of survival benefit.

Intraoperative ultrasonography and surgical strategy in hepatic resection: What difference does it make?

BACKGROUND

With modern advancements in preoperative imaging for liver surgery, intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) may be perceived as superfluous. Our aim was to determine if IOUS provides new information that changes surgical strategy in hepatic resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 121 consecutive liver resections performed at a single institution. Preoperative computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging determined the initial surgical strategy. The size, location and number of lesions were compared between IOUS and preoperative imaging. Reviewing the operative report helped determine if new IOUS findings led to changes in surgical strategy. Pathology reports were analyzed for margins.

RESULTS

Of 121 procedures analyzed, IOUS was used in 88. It changed the surgical plan in 15 (17%) cases. Additional tumours were detected in 10 (11%) patients. A change in tumour size and location were detected in 2 (2%) and 3 (4%) patients, respectively. Surgical plans were altered in 7 (8%) cases for reasons not related to IOUS. There was no significant difference (p = 0.74) in average margin length between the IOUS and non-IOUS groups (1.09 ± 1.18 cm v. 1.18 ± 1.05 cm).

CONCLUSION

Surgical strategy was altered owing to IOUS results in a substantial number of cases, and IOUS-guided resection planes resulted in R0 resections in nearly all procedures. The best operative plan in hepatic resection includes IOUS.

Is intraoperative ultrasound still useful for the detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases?

BACKGROUND

Debate on the optimal mode of preoperative imaging in the management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is ongoing and, despite its longstanding use, the precise role of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) is not well established. This study evaluates the impact of IOUS in the era of high-quality, cross-sectional imaging techniques.

METHODS

All patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM in a tertiary care referral centre from January 2006 to December 2013 were included. All patients were submitted to computed tomography (CT) and/or liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before surgery. Intraoperative US was performed mainly to detect previously non-diagnosed tumours that would change the surgical strategy.

RESULTS

A total of 225 liver resections were performed. Liver MRI and CT scans were available for 202 patients (89.8%) and 225 patients (100%), respectively. Radiological reports recorded 632 liver tumours in 219 patients (i.e. 2.9 lesions per patient). The median time between preoperative liver MRI and surgical resection was 36 days. Intraoperative inspection, palpation and US found 20 additional lesions in 18 patients (8.0%), in three of whom lesions were diagnosed only on IOUS (1.4%). Overall, only 12 of the 20 lesions were malignant.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CT and liver MRI are commonly used, IOUS alone allows the discovery of a few additional lesions that result in a change of surgical strategy in 1.4% of cases.

Differential diagnosis of liver tumours using intraoperative real-time tissue elastography

Background

Real-time tissue elastography is an innovative tool that informs the surgeon about tissue elasticity by applying the principle of ultrasonography. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of intraoperative real-time tissue elastography (IORTE) for the detection and characterization of liver tumours.

Methods

Between October 2010 and November 2011, IORTE was performed for liver lesions after the completion of routine B-mode intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS). The elasticity images of all tumours, except those of cysts, were classified into six categories according to modified criteria (types 1–6), according to the degree of strain contrast with the surrounding liver. The concordance of IORTE with pathological examination of the tumour, B-mode IOUS and clinical diagnosis after follow-up was assessed.

Results

Images were obtained from 92 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 92 adenocarcinomas, 19 other malignant tumours and 18 benign tumours in 158 patients. Using a minilinear probe, 73 of 88 HCCs were classified as having a ‘HCC pattern’ (type 3, 4 or 5), resulting in a sensitivity of 83·0 per cent, a specificity of 67·2 per cent and an accuracy of 73·7 per cent. Some 66 of 90 adenocarcinomas were classified as ‘adenocarcinoma pattern’ (type 6), resulting in a sensitivity of 73·3 per cent, specificity of 95·1 per cent and accuracy of 85·9 per cent. IORTE detected seven new lesions (8 per cent).

Conclusion

IORTE is useful for the detection and characterization of liver tumours.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Improving the preoperative staging of hepatocellular carcinoma and guiding individual treatment

AIM: To investigate the clinical role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) or magnetic resonance imaging to improve the preoperative staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and guide surgical decision-making.

METHODS: Sixty-nine patients who underwent liver resection for HCC in our center were enrolled prospectively in the study. CEUS and CE-CT/MRI were performed before surgery. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) was carried out after liver mobilization. Lesions depicted by each imaging modality were counted and mapped. To investigate the impact of tumor size on the study, we divided the patients into two groups, the “Smaller group”(S-group, ≤ 5 cm in diameter) and the “Larger-group” (L-group, > 5 cm in diameter). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CE-CT/MRI, CEUS, IOUS, CEUS+CE-CT/MRI and the tumor node metastasis staging of tumors were calculated and compared. Changes in the surgical strategy as a result of CEUS and IOUS were analyzed.

RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven nodules, comprising 94 HCCs confirmed by histopathology and 33 benign lesions confirmed by histopathology and follow-up, were identified in 69 patients. The overall diagnostic sensitivity rates of CE-CT/MRI, CEUS, IOUS and CEUS+ CE-CT/MRI were 78.7%, 89.4%, 89.4% and 89.4%, respectively. There was a significant difference between CEUS + CE-CT/MRI and CE-CT/MRI (P = 0.046). Combining CEUS with CT or MRI increased, the diagnostic specificity compared with CT/MRI, CEUS and IOUS, and this difference was statistically significant (100%, 72.7%, 97.0%, and 69.7%, P = 0.004, P = 0.002, P = 0.002, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher for CEUS + CT/MRI compared with CT/MRI (92.1% vs 77.2%, P = 0.001). The TNM staging of tumors based on CEUS + CE-CT/MRI approximated to the final pathological TNM staging (P = 0.977). There was a significant difference in the accuracy of TNM staging when comparing CEUS + CE-CT/MRI with CE-CT/MRI (P = 0.002). Before surgery, strategies were changed in 15.9% (11/69) of patients as a result of CEUS. Finally, only 5.7% (4/69) of surgical strategies were changed because of IOUS findings. In the S-group, CEUS revealed 12 false positive lesions, including seven false positive lesions that were diagnosed by preoperative imaging examinations and five by IOUS. In contrast, in the L-group, IUOS revealed eight new malignant lesions; six of these lesions were true HCCs that were also identified by preoperative CEUS.

CONCLUSION: CEUS combined with CT or MRI improves the accuracy of preoperative staging for hepatocellular carcinoma and may help to guide individualized treatment for patients with HCC. CEUS may better identify non-malignant lesions in patients with small tumors and discover new malignant lesions in patients with large tumors.

A comparison of diagnostic imaging modalities for colorectal liver metastases

AIMS

The aims of this study were to compare the diagnostic performance of CT scan, MR liver, PET-CT and intra-operative ultrasound (IOUS) for the detection of liver metastases against the histopathological findings, and to compare PET-CT with CT for the detection of distant disease in metastatic colorectal cancer patients eligible for surgical treatment.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed that measured concordance between the number and stage of metastatic lesions identified with various preoperative imaging modalities and histology of patients undergoing surgical treatment for CRLM.

RESULTS

Compared with histopathology, concordance for the number of metastatic liver lesions was moderate for CT scan (K = 0.477, 95% CI: 0.28-0.66), moderate for MR scan (K = 0.574, 95% CI: 0.39-0.75), good for FDG PET-CT (K = 0.703, 95% CI: 0.52-0.87) and very good for IOUS (K = 0.904, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99). Additional CRLM were identified intraoperatively in six patients (9.1%) with IOUS and in 7.5% of the cases surgical strategy was changed according to the new intraoperative findings. The diagnosis of intra abdominal lymph node metastatic disease was made with PET-CT only in nine patients (13.6%)

DISCUSSION

Our study supports the recent recommendations of the Oncosurg Multidisciplinary International Consensus regarding the importance of high quality CT and MR in the staging of CRLM but provides further evidence for the added value of PET-CT, especially in detecting extrahepatic intra-abdominal metastatic disease that may be amenable to potentially curative resection. Despite these advances in preoperative staging, there still remains a role for IOUS in detecting additional metastases at the time of surgery.

Selection for hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases: expert consensus statement

Hepatic resection offers a chance of a cure in selected patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). To achieve adequate patient selection and curative surgery, (i) precise assessment of the extent of disease, (ii) sensitive criteria for chemotherapy effect, (iii) adequate decision making in surgical indication and (iv) an optimal surgical approach for pre-treated tumours are required. For assessment of the extent of the disease, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) is recommended depending on the local expertise and availability. Positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT may offer additive information in detecting extrahepatic disease. The RECIST criteria are a reasonable method to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy. However, they are imperfect in predicting a pathological response in the era of modern systemic therapy with biological agents. The assessment of radiographical morphological changes is a better surrogate of the pathological response and survival especially in the patients treated with bevacizumab. Resectability of CLM is dependent on both anatomic and oncological factors. To decrease the surgical risk, a sufficient volume of liver remnant with adequate blood perfusion and biliary drainage is required according to the degree of histopathological injury of the underlying liver. Portal vein embolization is sometimes required to decrease the surgical risk in a patient with small future liver remnant volume. As a complete radiological response does not signify a complete pathological response, liver resection should include all the site of a tumour detected prior to systemic treatment.

Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS

Initially, a set of guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004 dealing only with liver applications. A second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some non-liver applications. Time has moved on, and the need for international guidelines on the use of CEUS in the liver has become apparent. The present document describes the third iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using contrast specific imaging techniques. This joint WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative has implicated experts from major leading ultrasound societies worldwide. These liver CEUS guidelines are simultaneously published in the official journals of both organizing federations (i.e., Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology for WFUMB and Ultraschall in der Medizin/European Journal of Ultrasound for EFSUMB). These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of all currently clinically available ultrasound contrast agents (UCA). They are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis and improve the management of patients worldwide.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open intraoperative ultrasonography for staging liver tumours

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver surgery must reproduce open surgical steps. Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) is mandatory, but reliability of laparoscopic IOUS has been poorly evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic versus open IOUS in staging liver tumours.

METHODS

All patients scheduled for liver resection between September 2009 and March 2011 were considered. Inclusion criteria were primary and metastatic tumours. Exclusion criteria were: hilar/gallbladder cholangiocarcinoma, ten or more lesions, repeat resection, laparoscopic hepatectomy, adhesions and unresectability. Following percutaneous ultrasonography and thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT), and on indication contrast-enhanced (CE) liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, patients were scheduled for laparoscopy, laparoscopic IOUS, then laparotomy, open IOUS and Partial hepatectomy. Data were collected prospectively. Reference standards were final pathology and 6-month follow-up results.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included, who had a median of 3 preoperative imaging studies (ultrasonography/CT 100 per cent, CE-MRI 67 per cent, PET-CT 54 per cent). A total of 119 lesions were diagnosed. Laparoscopic IOUS detected 22 additional lesions (+18·5 per cent) in 14 patients. Open IOUS detected two additional lesions, but did not confirm four lesions; overall 20 additional lesions (+16·8 per cent) were detected in ten patients. Pathology confirmed 14 newly detected malignant nodules (+11·8 per cent) in eight patients. After 6 months ten new nodules were identified in six patients. The sensitivity of preoperative imaging, laparoscopic IOUS and open IOUS was 83·1, 92·3 and 93·0 per cent respectively; accuracy was 79, 82 and 88 per cent. In comparison with open IOUS, the sensitivity and accuracy of laparoscopic IOUS were 98·6 and 94 per cent.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic IOUS is a reliable tool for staging liver tumours with a performance similar to that of open IOUS in detecting new nodules.

Value of visual inspection, bimanual palpation, and intraoperative ultrasonography during hepatic resection for liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative detection of new nodules is common in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases, although the value of intraoperative diagnosis is not well assessed.

METHODS

A prospectively collected and recorded database was retrospectively analyzed. Helical computed tomography (CT) results were correlated with those of the intraoperative diagnosis in 183 consecutive patients undergoing 254 consecutive hepatectomies, including repeated resection for colorectal liver metastases.

RESULTS

In total, 270 nodules were newly detected during 65 hepatectomies. The sensitivity of CT to detect metastatic nodules was 72.8% (722/992), but it decreased to 34.6% (125/361) for small (≤ 1 cm diameter) tumors. Intraoperative visual inspection and/or palpation detected 207 of 270 nodules. Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) played an important role in identifying deep (≥ 1 cm from the surface) and comparatively small (≤ 1 cm diameter) nodules (4/9 vs. 16/18, respectively, for those >1 cm vs. ≤ 1 cm diameter). The likelihood of intraoperative detection of new nodules increased from 10 in 112 to 6 in 9 when the preoperative tumor number increased from solitary to ≥ 10, resulting in an overall likelihood of 65 in 254 (25.6%). Of 65 patients with new nodules, 21 had at least one nodule that was detected only by IOUS. Preoperatively scheduled hepatectomy was altered in 47 (72%) patients, although additional limited resection(s) were sufficient to remove these nodules in 43 (91%) of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual inspection, palpation, and IOUS had equally indispensable roles in detecting new nodules during hepatectomy. Detection was common and usually necessitated alteration, albeit moderately, of the surgical plan.

Is intra-operative ultrasound still useful for the detection of a hepatic tumour in the era of modern pre-operative imaging?

BACKGROUND

The current role of intra-operative ultrasound (IOUS) is questioned because of recent progress in medical imaging. The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy of IOUS in the detection of a hepatic tumour (HT) compared with a pre-operative multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 418 patients evaluated using an 8-slice MDCT scan (SCAN8), 64-slice MDCT scan (SCAN64) and MRI alone or combined with a computed tomography (CT) scan. The pathological result was used as a gold standard.

RESULTS

Correlation rates for the number of detected lesions compared with pathology results were 0.627 for SCAN8, 0.785 for SCAN64, 0.657 for MRI and 0.913 for IOUS. Compared with pathology, the rate of concordance was significantly higher with IOUS (0.871) than with SCAN8 (0.736; P=0.011), SCAN64 (0.792; P<0.001) and MRI (0.742; P<0.001). IOUS was responsible for a change in operative strategy in 16.5% of patients. Surgery was extended in 12.4%, limited in 1.7% and abandoned in 2.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with cross-sectional pre-operative imaging, IOUS is still superior for the detection of HT and the planning of surgery. IOUS remains recommended as a routine procedure in patients having a hepatic resection in the era of modern pre-operative imaging.

Multi-modality curative treatment of salivary gland cancer liver metastases with drug-eluting bead chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, and surgical resection: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Liver metastases are rare in salivary gland tumors and have been reported only once to be the first manifestation of the disease. They are usually treated with surgical resection of the primary tumor and systemic chemotherapy. Drug-eluting bead chemoembolization has an evolving role in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as in the treatment of metastatic disease of the liver. Nevertheless, it has never been used in a patient with salivary gland liver metastases.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 51-year-old Caucasian Greek woman who presented to our hospital with liver metastases as the first manifestation of an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the left submandibular gland. The liver lesions were deemed inoperable because of their size and multi-focality and proved resistant to systemic chemotherapy. She was curatively treated with a combination of doxorubicin eluting bead (DC Beads) chemoembolization, intra-operative and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation, and radiofrequency-assisted surgical resection. The patient remained disease-free one year after the surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this complex case is an example of inoperable liver metastatic disease from the salivary glands that was refractory to systemic chemotherapy but was curatively treated with a combination of locoregional therapies and surgery. A multi-disciplinary approach and the adoption of modern radiological techniques produced good results after conventional therapies failed and there were no other available treatment modalities.

The impact of intraoperative ultrasonography on the surgical treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases

Introduction

Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) has been the standard in surgical decision making in oncologic liver surgery. Preoperative imaging techniques have improved substantially in resent years; therefore, the importance of IOUS might change. The current results of IOUS were compared with preoperative high-resolution helical CT scanning and the impact of IOUS on surgical decision making was evaluated.

Methods

A total of 100 consecutive patients who underwent open surgery for colorectal liver metastases within 4 weeks after preoperative imaging, performed with high-speed helical CT scanners, were included for this study. During surgery, IOUS was performed by a liver specialized radiologist. The findings on preoperative and intraoperative imaging and surgical exploration were compared regarding number, site, and size of the hepatic lesions. The preoperative surgical plan was compared with the final surgical treatment.

Results

One hundred patients with CRLM underwent 117 surgical treatments. In 38 patients IOUS differed from preoperative data. In 23 cases IOUS identified more metastatic lesions. In five patients, intraoperative findings identified smaller or less hepatic lesions. Additional information on the localization of the hepatic lesions was gathered by IOUS and changed the surgical treatment in ten cases. IOUS alone altered the surgical strategy 35 times during 117 procedures. In nearly all cases, discrepancy between the preoperative CT scan and IOUS resulted in a change of surgical treatment.

Conclusions

Despite improvement in preoperative imaging technology, the intraoperative use of ultrasonography remains of crucial importance. The detection of preoperatively unknown lesions remains high with great consequence on surgical therapy.

[Practice guidelines for management of hepatocellular carcinoma 2009]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cancer in Korea, typically has a poor prognosis, and constitutes the majority of primary hepatic malignancies. It is the number one cause of death among people in their 50s in Korea. The five-year survival rate of liver cancer is poor; at 18.9%. Efforts to increase the survival rate through early diagnosis of HCC and optimal treatments are keenly needed. Western guideline for the management of HCC were developed, but these guidelines are somewhat unsuitable for Korean patients. Thus, the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group (KLCSG) and the National Cancer Center (NCC), Korea jointly produced the Clinical Practice Guidelines for HCC for the first time in Korea in 2003. Owing to medical advances over the following six years, diagnosis and treatment of HCC has changed considerably. As more national and foreign data are accumulated, KLCSG and NCC, Korea recently revised the Clinical Practice Guidelines for HCC. Forty or more specialists in the field of hepatology, general surgery, radiology and radiation oncology participated, and meticulously reviewed national and foreign papers, and collected opinions through advisory committee conferences. These multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines summarized diagnosis, surgical resection, liver transplantation, local treatments, transarterial chemoembolization, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, preemptive antiviral treatments, and response evaluation of HCC. These Korean guidelines are expected to be useful for clinical management of and research on HCC.

Is there a role for endoscopic ultrasonography in evaluation of the left liver in colorectal liver metastasis patients selected for right hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Meticulous assessment of the left liver for patients scheduled for right hepatectomy is essential. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is frequently used for the locoregional staging or biopsy of pancreatic tumours and has shown some value in the evaluation of the left liver.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 24 consecutive patients who were scheduled for at least a right hepatectomy and who underwent laparotomy for colorectal liver metastasis (CLMs). The left liver was assessed preoperatively with standard techniques [computed tomography (CT) scan, percutaneous ultrasonography] and EUS. These results were compared with those of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS).

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 12 men and 12 women (mean age 64 years, range 47-79 years). Mean body mass index was 26 kg/m(2) (range 20-35 kg/m(2)). Standard preoperative evaluation detected 28 lesions in the left liver; EUS detected just 17 lesions, whereas IOUS detected 30 lesions in the left liver. For the left lobe of the liver (segments II and III), the standard evaluation had sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 64%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 50% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 91%; EUS had sensitivity of 55%, specificity of 86%, PPV of 71% and NPV of 76%; IOUS had sensitivity of 85.2%, specificity of 92%, PPV of 96.6% and NPV of 75%. In terms of the left liver (i.e. segments II, III and IV), the results of EUS were less good than for the left lobe of the liver.

CONCLUSION

For segments II and III, EUS had higher specificity and positive predictive value than standard evaluation, but only changed our therapeutic strategy in three cases. Even though EUS can provide some valuable information, the technique is not accurate enough to merit systematic performance as part of a standard preoperative evaluation. This study underlines the main role of IOUS in the left liver, with better sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value than EUS and standard evaluation.

Value of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A report of 20 cases

AIM: To assess the clinical value of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) as a novel tool in partial hepatectomy for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS: From January 2007 to September 2007, a total of 20 consecutive cirrhotic patients with HCC scheduled to undergo partial hepatectomy were studied. Preoperative contrast enhanced computer tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance (MR) scans were performed within 1-2 wk before operation. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) and CE-IOUS were carried out after mobilization of the liver. Lesions on precontrast and postcontrast scans were counted and mapped. CE-IOUS was performed with intravenous injection of ultrasound contrast agents SonoVue (Bracco Imaging, Milan, Italy). Arterial, portal and late phases of contrast enhancement were recorded and analyzed. Nodules showing arterial phase hyper-enhancing and/or hypo-enhancing in late parenchymal phase were considered malignant and removed surgically. Ultrasound-guided biopsy and ethanol ablation would be an option if the nodule could not be removed surgically. Newly detected nodules on IOUS showing iso-enhancement in both arterial and late phases were considered benign. These nodules were either removed surgically if they were close to the main lesion or followed by examinations of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and ultrasound and/or CT/MR every 3 mo.

RESULTS: IOUS found 41 nodules in total, among which 17 (41.46%) were newly detected compared to preoperative imaging. Thirty-three nodules were diagnosed malignant by CE-IOUS, including one missed by IOUS. The sensitivity and specificity of CE-IOUS on detecting HCC nodules are 100% (33/33 and 100% (9/9), respectively. Nine nodules were considered benign by CE-IOUS, four was confirmed at histology and five by follow-up. CE-IOUS changed the surgical strategy in 35% (7/20) of patients and avoid unnecessary intervention in 30% (6/20) of patients.

CONCLUSION: CE-IOUS is a useful means to charac-terize the nodules detected by IOUS in cirrhotic liver, to find isoechoic HCC nodules which can not be shown on IOUS and to improve the accuracy of conventional IOUS, thus it can be used as an essential tool in the surgical treatment of cirrhotic patients with HCC.