Guidelines for deep venous thrombosis prophlaxis during laparoscopic surgery

Routine anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism prevention following laparoscopic gastric bypass

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) by using routine postoperative enoxaparin versus early ambulation, SCDs, hydration, and selective prophylactic pharmacologic anticoagulation.

METHODS

1,692 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass from October 2001 to October 2008 were included and divided into 2 groups based on when they were operated upon. Group A (435 patients) received routine enoxaparin 12 hours after surgery. Group B (1,257 patients) received selective pharmacologic anticoagulation, in high-risk patients only.

RESULTS

Mean operating time was 144±26 minutes (Group A) and 126±15 minutes (Group B). Mean length of stay was 2.3±1.5 days for Group A and 1.4±1.2 for Group B. Intraluminal bleeding occurred in 21 patients (4.8%) in Group A and 5 (0.9%) in Group B; none required intervention. Five pulmonary embolisms occurred in Group A (1.1%) and none in Group B. Seven patients in Group A (1.7%) and 6 (0.47%) in Group B had clinically evident DVT. Two non-VTE related deaths occurred in Group A.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate VTE prophylaxis is achieved using SCDs, early ambulation, emphasis on hydration, and shorter operating times. Bariatric surgery can be safely performed without pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in all but the high-risk population. Fewer bleeding complications occur without the use of anticoagulants.

Complications of laparoscopic surgery for renal masses: prevention, management, and comparison with the open experience

CONTEXT

The initial excitement about the laparoscopic treatment of renal masses has been tempered by concerns related to increased operative time, technical complexity, and the suitability of laparoscopic approaches to oncologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of intraoperative and postoperative complications and their prevention and management during laparoscopic surgery of renal tumors.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature review of the Medline and Google Scholar databases was performed, searching for renal cell carcinoma, renal mass, laparoscopy, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, open radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, open partial nephrectomy, laparoscopic cryoablation, laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation, complications, intra-operative, and post-operative. English-language articles published between 1990 and 2008 were reviewed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN), whether transperitoneal or retroperitoneal, can be performed safely. The overall complication rate is low and does not significantly differ from that of the open experience. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), in contrast, is a technically challenging procedure. Although the intermediate oncologic outcomes are comparable to those of the open experience, there are concerns related to warm ischemia time, and there is a risk of major complications such as urinary leakage and hemorrhage requiring transfusion. Laparoscopic-assisted ablative therapies (cryotherapy and radiofrequency) are being performed more commonly for the treatment of small exophytic renal lesions with a low complication rate and intermediate oncologic outcomes similar to LRN and LPN.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications associated with the laparoscopic management of renal masses vary among the different procedures and with surgeon experience. The rate of complication appears to be similar to that of open surgery.