Transumbilical endoscopic surgery: a preliminary clinical report

Comparison of Two Different Accesses Single Orifice Percutaneous Endoscopic Surgery in Diagnosis of Ascites of Unknown Origin: A Retrospective Study

Background

Ascites is a common clinical finding caused by many different diseases, so we developed a technique termed single orifice percutaneous endoscopic surgery (SOPES) which can access peritoneal cavity through the contralateral McBurney's point or umbilicus to seek the underlying causes. In this study, we describe the initial clinical experience of SOPES and compare the application of two accesses.

Methods

This is a retrospective study performed between 2007 and 2018. Patients with ascites of unknown origin who underwent these two kinds of SOPES were included. Main outcomes were measured by diagnostic accuracy, complication rate, procedure time, time till stitches removal, length of hospital stay, and hospital cost.

Results

148 patients successfully undergone SOPES via the contralateral McBurney's point (IM group, n = 70) or the umbilicus (UM group, n = 78). 63 patients in the IM group and 71 patients in the UM group reached clear diagnosis (90.0% vs. 91.0%, p = 0.831). The overall complication rate was 5.4%, while the UM group was higher than the IM group (10.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.017). All complications were resolved after medical treatment, and no mortality resulted from this procedure. The procedure time and the time until stitches removal in the UM group were longer than that in the IM group. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay and hospital cost between the two groups.

Conclusions

SOPES, which combines the strength of minimally invasive single orifice incision and flexible angles of examination and instrumentation, is a newly developed flexible endoscopic surgical modality that provides new important clinical valuable in evaluation of ascites of unknown origin. Moreover, SOPES via the contralateral McBurney's point was safer than the umbilicus approach.

Higher cost of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to longer operating time. A study of opportunity cost based on meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to calculate the opportunity cost of the operating time to demonstrate that single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is more expensive than classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).

METHODS

We identified studies comparing use of both techniques during the period 2008-2016, and to calculate the opportunity cost, we performed another search in the same period of time with an economic evaluation of classic laparoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis of the items selected in the first review considering the cost of surgery and surgical time, and we analyzed their differences. We subsequently calculated the opportunity cost of these time differences based on the design of a cost/time variable using the data from the second literature review.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles were selected from the first review: 26 for operating time (3.138 patients) and 3 for the cost of surgery (831 patients), and 3 articles from the second review. Both echniques have similar operating costs. Single incision laparoscopy surgery takes longer (16.90min) to perform (p <0.00001) and this difference represents an opportunity cost of 755.97 € (cost/time unit factor of 44.73 €/min).

CONCLUSIONS

SILC costs the same as CLC, but the surgery takes longer to perform, and this difference involves an opportunity cost that increases the total cost of SILC. The value of the opportunity cost of the operating time can vary the total cost of a surgical technique and it should be included in the economic evaluation to support the decision to adopt a new surgical technique.

Evolution of the Konyang Standard Method for single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the result from a thousand case of a single center experience

Purpose

Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is increasingly performed worldwide. Accordingly, the Konyang Standard Method (KSM) for SILC has been developed over the past 6 years. We report the outcomes of our procedures.

Methods

Between April 2010 and December 2016, 1,005 patients underwent SILC at Konyang University Hospital. Initially 3-channel SILC with KSM was changed to 4-channel SILC using a modified technique with a snake retractor for exposure of Calot triangle; we called this a modified KSM (mKSM). Recently, we have used a commercial 4-channel (Glove) port for simplicity.

Results

SILC was performed in 323 patients with the KSM, in 645 with the mKSM, and in 37 with the commercial 4-channel port. Age was not significantly different between the 3 groups (P = 0.942). The postoperative hospital days (P = 0.051), operative time (P < 0.001) and intraoperative bleeding volume (P < 0.001) were significantly improved in the 3 groups. Drain insertion (P = 0.214), additional port insertion (P = 0.639), and postoperative complications (P = 0.608) were not significantly different in all groups. Postoperative complications were evaluated with the Clavien-Dindo classification. There were 3 cases (0.9%) over grade IIIb (bile duct injury, incisional hernia, duodenal perforation, or small bowel injury) with KSM and 3 (0.5%) with mKSM.

Conclusion

We evaluated the evolution of the KSM for SILC. The use of the mKSM with a commercial 4-channel port may be the safest and most effective method for SILC.

Transumbilical endoscopic technique for complete closure of inguinal hernias in female pediatric patients

Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of inguinal hernia with variable devices as an effective technique in minimal-access surgery for pediatric inguinal hernias in children was investigated in the present study. A Veress needle was inserted into the abdomen. Trocars, laparoscope and needle holder were placed through the umbilical incision. Under laparoscopic monitoring, a round needle was introduced into the peritoneal cavity through the anterior abdominal wall. The end of the suture inside the peritoneal cavity was left outside the peritoneal cavity in favor of ligation. The needle was passed through the peritoneum to place an extraperitoneal purse-string suture around the internal inguinal ring, counterclockwise on the left and clockwise on the right. The needle was then passed back into the peritoneal cavity and out through the abdominal wall, and the needle ends of the stitch were cut. The ends of the suture were tied. We described a technique used for transumbilical endoscopic closure of pediatric inguinal hernias in girls. This technique is simple and can be performed quickly. The cosmetic result is excellent because the two umbilical incisions are only 5-mm long, which make it possible to perform surgery without a visible scar. We performed this procedure in over 96 patients and have had no recurrences. Thus, this method may become the laparoscopic repair of choice for females with inguinal hernias.

Rigid vs articulating instrumentation for task completion in single-port surgery

BACKGROUND

Single-port access surgery (SPA) may provide benefits but there is a steep learning curve. We compare traditional in-line instruments with articulating instruments.

METHODS

Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery peg transfer task was performed using a 3-port approach or SPA device. Standard rigid instrumentation was compared with articulating instrumentation.

RESULTS

Twenty surgeons completed all tasks. Average time using a conventional approach was shorter than SPA (144 ± 54 vs 198 ± 74 seconds, P < .001). Articulating instruments required longer procedural time than rigid instrumentation (201 ± 66 vs 141 ± 58 seconds, P < .001). In the conventional model, task time was lower with rigid instruments than with articulating instruments (108 vs 179 seconds, P < .001). Task time in the SPA model was lower with rigid instruments (173 vs 223 seconds, P =.013).

CONCLUSIONS

All tasks required longer time to complete in SPA when compared with a conventional approach. Articulating instruments have an increased benefit in SPA surgery.

Single-incision pediatric endosurgery in newborns and infants

This study focuses on the successful application of single-incision pediatric endosurgery in the treatment of congenital anomalies and acquired diseases in neonates and infants. The purpose of this scientific review consists in highlighting the spectrum, indications, applicability, and effectiveness of single-port endosurgery in children during the first 3 postnatal months.

Transumbilical endoscopic surgery for incarcerated inguinal hernias in infants and children

PURPOSE

To describe transumbilical laparoscopic herniorrhaphy after unsuccessful attempted manual reduction of incarcerated inguinal hernias in infants and children.

METHODS

In our two hospitals, two-trocar transumbilical endoscopic surgery (TUES) is the standard technique used to repair incarcerated inguinal hernias in infants and children. Seventeen patients (aged 8months to 2.5years; median, 15months; 15 boys, 2 girls) with incarcerated inguinal hernias underwent urgent laparoscopy after unsuccessful attempted manual reduction. Two 3- or 5-mm trocars were inserted into the abdomen through two intraumbilical incisions, under laparoscopic guidance. The hernia was reduced by combined external manual pressure and internal pulling with bowel forceps. After inspection of the bowel, a round needle with a 2-0 nonabsorbable suture was introduced into the peritoneal cavity through the anterior abdominal wall near the internal inguinal ring. The hernial orifice was closed with an extraperitoneal purse-string suture around the internal inguinal ring, and tied with an intraperitoneal knot. A similar procedure was performed on the contralateral side if the processus vaginalis was patent.

RESULTS

The TUES procedure was successful in all patients. No conversions to open surgery were required. The mean operating time was 30min (range, 25-40min). All patients were discharged on the second postoperative day. No complications such as postoperative bleeding, hydrocele, or scrotal edema were observed. The mean follow-up period was 15months. No cases of testicular atrophy, hypotrophy, or hernia recurrence were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary experience with using TUES for the treatment of incarcerated inguinal hernias in infants and children had satisfactory outcomes. This technique appeared to be safe, effective, and reliable, and had excellent cosmetic results.

Controversies in single-port laparoscopic surgery

Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is a rapidly involving minimally invasive surgical technique. SPLS has been applied to a variety of surgical procedures, including appendectomy, cholecystectomy, colectomy, and bariatric surgery. The true advantage of SPLS over conventional laparoscopic surgery has been always a topic of debate. Here, we discuss few controversies related to SPLS, starting from nomenclature, access techniques, true technical challenges, port-site hernia, and ideal patient for SPLS.

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to analyze systematically the randomized, controlled trials that compared single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).

METHODS

The meta-analysis was conducted according to the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysis (QUORUM) standards. The included studies were analyzed systematically using the statistical software package RevMan. The summated outcomes were expressed as the risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous variables and standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized trials encompassing 858 patients were retrieved from the electronic databases. In the random effects model, postoperative pain, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, cosmesis score, conversion rate, and time to return to normal activities were statistically comparable between the two cholecystectomy techniques. SILC was associated with a longer operating time [SMD 0.71; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.38, 1.05; z = 4.18; p < 0.0001) and an increased requirement for additional port insertion (RR 6.54; 95 % CI 2.19, 19.57; z = 3.36; p < 0008). However, there was significant heterogeneity among the trials.

CONCLUSIONS

SILC does not offer any advantage over CLC for treating benign gallbladder disorders. CLC may be used assiduously for this purpose.

Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A review on the complications

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to establish the incidence of postoperative complications after single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A literature search was performed using the PubMed database. Search terms included single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, single port cholecystectomy, minimal invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy, nearly scarless cholecystectomy and complications.

RESULTS:

A total of 38 articles meeting the selection criteria were reviewed. A total of 1180 patients were selected to undergo single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Introduction of extra ports was necessary in 4% of the patients. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in 0.4% of the patients. Laparoscopic cholangiography was attempted in 4% of the patients. The incidence of major complications requiring surgical intervention or ERCP with stenting was 1.7%. The mortality rate was zero.

CONCLUSION:

Although the number of complications after single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems favourable, it is too early to conclude that single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure. Large randomised controlled trials will be necessary to further establish its safety.

Systemic inflammatory response after single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus standard laparoscopic approach

PURPOSE

The extent of surgical trauma is reflected by systemic inflammatory response (SIR). The aim of this study was to assess SIR after single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus the standard laparoscopic approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty pigs were assigned into 4 groups: SILS (group SILS), laparoscopy using 4 trocars (group LAPSC), pneumoperitoneum (group PNE), or a sham-operation (group Sham) group. Blood samples were taken at 0, 1, 3, 6, 24, and 48 hours and 1 week postoperation to measure tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, and C-reactive protein serum levels.

RESULTS

No significant changes were noted among groups for each time point studied regarding tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6, and IL-18. C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower (P<0.05) in group PNE compared with the other groups at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1 week.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in SIR after SILS versus the standard laparoscopic approach.

Glove technique in single-port access laparoscopic surgery: results of an initial experience

Introduction. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a virtually "scarless" technique. A retrospective analysis is performed to evaluate an initial experience of this surgical approach. Materials and Methods. From January 2010 to October 2011, SILS was considered as a minimally invasive approach to abdominal disease. The access was made by a standard wound protector and a size 6 glove. A series of little accesses were made on the tips of the glove-fingers to induce pneumoperitoneum and to create a working channel for the laparoscopic instruments. An analysis of costs of this technique was made too. Results. SILS was successfully completed with low cost in 34 patients: 20 appendectomy, 12 cholecystectomy, and 2 right colectomy were performed with a median operative time of 35, 45, and 67.5 minutes, respectively. In no patient any conversion to standard laparoscopy or to open surgery was needed. The postoperative course was uneventful in all patients. In right hemicolectomy, the oncological parameters were respected. Conclusions. In this paper the glove-port technique showed multiple advantages. The SILS is a feasible approach for some pathologies in selected patients. The glove-port is a simple, low-cost, reproducible, and sure method to perform SILS in a high-experienced laparoscopic surgical centre.

"Obama system:" a new easy, safe, and economical technique for laparoscopic single-port surgery

INTRODUCTION

Various approaches to laparoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) have been developed to reduce pain and other complications, promote recovery, and improve cosmetic outcomes, particularly relative to conventional open or laparoscopic surgery. Three-port procedures for LESS have been reported to be superior to single-port access, but they usually require expensive, technically sophisticated instruments. To avoid these problems, we have developed a modified procedure for performing LESS with a single port, referred to as the "Obama system."

METHODS

From January 2009 through December 2010, we performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in 61 patients. Conventional LC with three ports was performed in 39 patients, LESS with a SILS Port was performed in 4 patients, and modified LESS was performed using the Obama system in 18 patients. The operative results were compared.

RESULTS

LC was successfully completed in all 61 patients, with no postoperative complications. The mean operating time was 102.3 min (C-reactive protein [CRP] ≤ 2) and 160.1 min (CRP > 2) in the 39 patients who underwent conventional LC, 108.3 min (CRP ≤ 2) in the 4 patients who underwent LESS with a SILS Port, and 116.5 min (CRP ≤ 2) and 186.5 min (CRP > 2) in the 18 patients who underwent LESS using the Obama system. No morbidity or mortality was associated with any technique.

CONCLUSION

The Obama system is easier to use and more efficient and reliable than any other technique currently available for LESS. This system is expected to greatly contribute to the further development and wider acceptance of LESS.

Learning curve of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS): a preliminary study of 80 selected patients with benign gallbladder diseases

BACKGROUND

Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new laparoscopic procedure in which only one transumbilical incision is made, demonstrated as a scarless procedure. Here we report a single-center preliminary experience of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) in the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases, defining a single surgeon's learning curve.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients underwent SILC successfully by a single experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The operation was performed following the routine LC procedure. Then the perioperative demographics were recorded and the operative time was used to define the learning curve.

RESULTS

The study group included 27 male and 53 female patients with gallstones (56 cases), cholesterol polyps (16 cases), an adenomatous polyp (3 cases), adenomyomatosis (1 case), or complex diseases (4 cases), and all consented to undergo SILC. No patient was converted to normal LC or open surgery. There were no perioperative port-related or surgical complications. The average operative time was 46.9 ± 14.6 min. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.8 ± 1.3 days. The learning curve of the SILC procedures for this series of selected patients confirmed that SILC is a feasible, safe, and effective approach to the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

For experienced laparoscopic surgeons, SILC is an easy and safe procedure. Patients benefit from milder pain, a lower incidence of port-related complications, better cosmesis, and fast recovery. The SILC procedure may become another option for the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases for selected patients.

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct exploration via the umbilical port

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy currently is the gold standard technique for gallbladder removal. The use of routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) is widely practiced during conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC) to confirm biliary anatomy and allow for immediate management of unexpected choledocholithiasis. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) offers a more aesthetic technique for gallbladder removal and has been reported by several groups. However, no series to date have included routine IOC without a separate incision. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of the SILS technique for cholecystectomy with routine IOC (LCIOC) and common bile duct (CBD) exploration as needed via the umbilical port.

METHODS

A database was prospectively completed for a series of 60 consecutive patients undergoing single-incision LCIOC via the umbilical port. Details of the patients, operations, indications, outcomes, and follow-up evaluation were included.

RESULTS

Of the 60 patients included in the database, 55 (91.7%) successfully underwent single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), whereas the remaining five patients required conversion to 4PLC. No patient required conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC). Of the 55 successful SILC patients, 53 (88.3%) successfully received IOCs, 48 of which were normal. The remaining five IOCs demonstrated choledocholithiasis, four of which could be managed laparoscopically without the need for conversion to either 4PLC or OC. One patient required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Complications included four wound infections (7.8%), one incisional hernia (2.0%), and one bile leak (3.2%). The operating time ranged from 35 to 180 min and decreased with experience.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the largest series to date of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomies with routine IOC via the umbilical port and is the first study to demonstrate that the laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis during SILC is feasible.

Learning curve of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy determined using the non-linear ordinary least squares method based on a non-linear regression model: An analysis of 150 consecutive patients

INTRODUCTION

Single port laparoscopic surgery has come to the forefront of minimally invasive surgery. For those familiar with conventional techniques, however, this type of operation demands a different type of eye/hand coordination and involves unfamiliar working instruments. Herein, the authors describe the learning curve and the clinical outcomes of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for 150 consecutive patients with benign gallbladder disease.

METHOD

All patients underwent single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a homemade glove port by one of five operators with different levels of experiences of laparoscopic surgery. The learning curve for each operator was fitted using the non-linear ordinary least squares method based on a non-linear regression model.

RESULTS

Mean operating time was 77.6 ± 28.5 min. Fourteen patients (6.0%) were converted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Complications occurred in 15 patients (10.0%), as follows: bile duct injury (n = 2), surgical site infection (n = 8), seroma (n = 2), and wound pain (n = 3). One operator achieved a learning curve plateau at 61.4 min per procedure after 8.5 cases and his time improved by 95.3 min as compared with initial operation time. Younger surgeons showed significant decreases in mean operation time and achieved stable mean operation times. In particular, younger surgeons showed significant decreases in operation times after 20 cases.

CONCLUSION

Experienced laparoscopic surgeons can safely perform single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional or angled laparoscopic instruments. The present study shows that an operator can overcome the single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy learning curve in about eight cases.

Are natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision surgery viable techniques for cholecystectomy?

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision surgery (SIS) are less invasive alternatives to traditional laparoscopic techniques. Concerns exist over the safety of these new approaches, and randomized controlled trials have yet to confirm a net benefit. If NOTES and SIS techniques are to become standard practice, then they should be shown to be safe and hold clear benefits to patients. We aim at comparing the available results by using these techniques in a standard laparoscopic operation (cholecystectomy).

METHODS

A systematic review using available databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) and the published English language medical literature was performed. All the archived articles were cross-referenced. Outcome data obtained from a Cochrane review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were used as the control group. All the operations performed via a single incision were grouped under SIS, and operations in which a natural orifice (alone or as a hybrid technique) was analyzed, under NOTES group. Mortality and complications were the primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five papers including 4703 patients (714 NOTES, 3989 SIS) were selected for analysis. Overall complication rate was 4.2% in the NOTES group versus 4.3% in the SIS group, with a distinct complication profile. No mortality was reported in either group. NOTES procedures had a longer mean operative time than SIS techniques (107 versus 79 minutes). The conversion rate between NOTES and SILS was similar (3.4% versus 3.3%, respectively).

DISCUSSION

No difference in the incidence of complications was observed with the newer techniques. Adequately powered randomized control trials are needed to clarify whether SIS/NOTES cholecystectomy has a similar length of hospital stay to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The increased occurrence of specific types of complications and their use in acute pathology needs further investigation to warrant further use in routine surgical practice.

Transumbilical endoscopic surgery for completely enclosing inguinal hernias in children

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

There has been great interest in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in recent years. We report another new approach for pediatric inguinal hernia repair: transumbilical endoscopic surgery (TUES). Compared with the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery technique, TUES can obtain similar scarless results on the abdomen.

METHODS

In our hospital, 2-trocar TUES was the standard procedure used to repair pediatric inguinal hernias. Through 2 intraumbilical incisions, two 5-mm trocars were inserted into the abdomen under laparoscopic guidance. With the use of a needle-holding forceps, a round needle with 2-0 nonabsorbable suture material was introduced into the peritoneal cavity through the anterior abdominal wall near the internal inguinal ring. The orifice of the hernial sac was closed extraperitoneally with a purse-string suture around the internal inguinal ring, and intraperitoneal knot-tying was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 76 inguinal repairs were performed in 64 children (age range, 6 months to 9 years; median, 3.8 years; 44 boys, 20 girls). All operations were completed successfully by TUES, with the exception of one case of intraoperative bleeding because the inferior epigastric vein was punctured. The mean operating time was 20 minutes (range, 15-30 minutes). No postoperative bleeding, hydrocele, or scrotal edema in this group of patients was found, and there were no known cases of postoperative testicular atrophy or hypotrophy nor hernia recurrence on the symptomatic side.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary experience shows satisfactory outcomes with TUES for completely enclosing inguinal hernias in children. This technique appears to be safe, effective, and reliable. The cosmetic result is excellent.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for gallbladder removal and the most common laparoscopic procedure worldwide. With the advent of laparoscopic surgery and its continuous development, the focus has shifted to 'scarless' surgery. In recent times, the innovative technique of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been applied in gallbladder removal and even more complex biliopancreatic procedures to further minimize the invasiveness of the surgery. Newer developments in laparoscopic equipments and instrumentation have helped to further evolve this field of minimally invasive surgery. Literature search was performed using the following online search engines: Google, Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and the online Springer link library. The terms used for the search were as follows: SILS, LESS, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, single-port laparoscopic surgery, SILS cholecystectomy, and SILS pancreatic surgery. Articles that matched the search criteria were selected and extensively reviewed. Moreover, pertinent information on instrumentation and technology for SILS and LESS was obtained by accessing websites of manufacturers. Although SILS represents the search for an essentially scarless surgery, there is still not a widespread use and uniformity of this procedure. SILS is performed either by single- or multiple-port technique. In the present article, we present a review of the potential benefits, limitations, and risks of SILS in biliary and pancreatic diseases. There are many studies showing benefits in cholecystectomy. A few case reports have also emerged about its feasibility in procedures such as cystogastrostomy and limited pancreatic resection. Further research and development of this technique is needed to arrive at a tangible conclusion about the perceived benefits of SILS. Randomized studies to compare SILS with traditional laparoscopy are essential.

Bile duct injury after single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

This study notes that the development of single-incision laparoscopic surgery is not without risk and that obtaining the critical view in appropriately selected patients is essential for safe single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

Background:

The advancement and development of laparoscopic cholecystectomy revolutionized surgery and case management. Many procedures are routinely performed laparoscopically. Single incision laparoscopic surgery has been introduced with the hope of further reduction of scarring and possibly procedural pain. With no established technique for this procedure, the safety of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not been determined.

Methods and Results:

A 30-year-old man underwent single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis at an outside hospital. The operation was uneventful, and the patient was discharged home. The patient returned to the Emergency Department 4 days postoperatively, and a bile duct injury was diagnosed. A percutaneous drain was placed, and the patient was transferred to the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) service of a tertiary care center for definitive care. A delayed repair approach was used to allow the inflammation around the porta to decrease. Six weeks after injury, the patient underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The patient did well postoperatively.

Conclusion:

Although single incision laparoscopic surgery will play a prominent role in the future, its development and application are not without risks as demonstrated from this case. It is imperative that surgeons better define the surgical approach to achieve the critical view and select appropriate patients for single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A clinical review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery

Laparoscopic surgery is one of the most significant surgical advances of the twentieth century. Recently, the focus has been on the development of minimally invasive techniques in the form of single-incision laparoscopic surgery. The single-incision technique provides a less invasive alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery, requiring only one incision disguised within the umbilical folds in contrast to the three to five incisions in conventional laparoscopic surgery. The availability of a number of specialised ports has aided the development of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and led to its widespread use. The successful use of single-incision laparoscopic surgery has been reported for a number of surgical procedures, and offers several potential benefits versus conventional laparoscopic surgery, including reduced pain, reduced time to recovery and improved cosmesis. This review of international literature assesses the current status, as well as the experience, of single-incision laparoscopic surgery within general, colorectal, bariatric, metabolic, gynaecological and urological surgery. The challenges faced with single-incision laparoscopic surgery are discussed, as well as the clinical studies that are required in order to establish single-incision surgery as a significant improvement to conventional laparoscopic surgery in terms of reduced pain and improved cosmesis.

Transumbilical endoscopic surgery: History, present situation and perspectives

Transumbilical endoscopic surgery or laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) surgery has become an exciting area of surgical development as innovation continues to move in the 21^st century to minimally invasive surgery. The history, present situation and perspectives are reviewed and the nomenclature of this technique is discussed in this article. The range of this technique has been applied in almost all abdominal diseases, surgeries for morbid obesity, hernia and so on, in recent years. It is estimated that 50%-80% of traditional laparoscopic surgery could be performed transumbilically in the next five years according to the LESSCAR consensus. Although the concept of transumbilical laparoscopic surgery is gaining traction rapidly and the instruments have been improved greatly, we should not advocate for slightly improved cosmetic value over safety. Multicenter, randomized and clinical trials are necessary to further elucidate the safety and efficiency of this new technique. Research that examines the efficacy of the new instruments on the market may be helpful to simplify the confusing landscape of new and novel products designed for this purpose.

[Single port transumbilical cholecystectomy [SILS] -- 30 non-selected cases]

Single port laparoscopic surgery became popular all over the world, and cholecystectomy represents the most frequent intervention with this technique. We compared transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomies (SILS) to conventional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC), which were performed by the same surgeon between 2008-2010. As regards SILS cases, they represent a non-selected series. Transabdominal sutures were not applied in any of those, but one additional 5 mm port was inserted in two SILS cases. Only straight instruments were used in all but two SILS cholecystectomies. Mean age of patients was lower in the SILS group, however male:female ratio and BMI were similar. While none of the procedures were converted in the SILS group, one needed to be done so in the LC patients. One of the SILS patients underwent a transumbilical laparoscopic wash-out for an intrabdominal haematoma, which developed due to non-surgical reasons. Mean operative time and postoperative hospitalisation was 75.9 ± 25 minutes and two days in the SILS group, while 55.7 ± 17 minutes and 2.8 days in the LC group, respectively. We concluded that transumbilical single port cholecystectomy can be performed safely by using conventional straight instruments. We could not identify any publication about non-selected SILS cholecystectomy series in the English language literature.

Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy via 12-mm trocar incision site

BACKGROUND

Single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (S-LAVH) uses only one transumbilical incision site and has better cosmetic result than conventional multiport LAVH. This study aimed to evaluate our initial experience with S-LAVH compared with the more conventional three-port LAVH in women with benign uterine diseases.

METHODS

Between April 2009 and April 2010, S-LAVH was attempted on 183 patients with benign uterine diseases through a transumbilical incision for a 12-mm trocar, and conventional LAVH was performed on 275 patients by the same surgeon. The medical records of patients were reviewed. The age, body mass index, operative time, blood loss, and uterine weight on pathologic report were compared.

RESULTS

Two of 183 patients in the S-LAVH group were converted to two- or three-port surgery, compared with none in the conventional group. Data analysis was done for 181 patients in the S-LAVH group and 275 patients in the conventional LAVH group. No major complications, including ureteral or bladder injuries, occurred in any of the patients. No statistically significant differences were found in mean age, mean body mass index, mean operative time, mean anesthesia time, mean estimated blood loss, or mean postoperative days to passage of flatus, but the mean uterine weights on the pathologic reports were significantly reduced in the S-LAVH group.

CONCLUSION

S-LAVH could be a feasible alternative method for removal of the uterus with a better cosmetic outcome resulting from single wound in selected patients. For patients with large-sized uterus, more surgical experience and improvement in instruments suitable for S-LAVH are needed.

Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center experience

INTRODUCTION

Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is a variation in which trocar scars are hidden in the umbilicus. We sought to determine whether SILS cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our series of 205 SIL cholecystectomies (SILC) performed between May 2008-June 2010. The first 50 cases were done by initially insufflating the abdomen with a veress needle through the umbilicus and then placing 3, 5 mm ports in the umbilicus. The remaining cases were performed using a cut down approach at the umbilicus, followed by placement of a three-trocar SILS port under direct vision.

RESULTS

Two hundred and five patients (M:F = 48:157) underwent SILC during the study period. Median age was 45 (range = 21-62). Mean BMI range was 35 (range = 21-44). Mean operative time was 60 min (range = 40-120 min) and a follow up period that ranges from 1 to 21 months. Patient pathologies included: Chronic cholecystitis (74%), Acute cholecystitis (17%), Choledocholithiasis (6.8%), Gallstone pancreatitis (2%) and gallbladder polyp (0.5%). An additional port was placed in the umbilicus in 3% of cases. No cases were converted to open. Complications occurred in 4% of cases including: 3 patients with retained stones, 2 patients with post-op wound infection, 2 patients with incisional hernias in the umbilical region and 1patient with a veress injury.

CONCLUSION

SIL cholecystectomy can be done safely. It offers a better cosmetic result, which may lead to greater patient satisfaction.

No visible scar (NVIS) colectomy: a new approach to minimal access surgery to the colon

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgery continues to revolutionize surgical standards with trends toward further minimalization and improved cosmesis. Approaches such as laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) have thus emerged. The authors devised an alternative method for a more efficient approach to minimally invasive surgery called no visible scar (NVIS). This study describes NVIS and its ability to provide operative capacity and outcomes similar to other minimal access techniques, but with improved cosmesis and possibly decreased associated complications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing colectomy between June 2009 and March 2010 to evaluate our outcomes with the NVIS technique (surgical approach via a 4-5 cm suprapubic site for inserting trocars/multiport and specimen extraction, with a 5-mm umbilical incision for a single trocar). Outcome measures included intraoperative complications, postoperative morbidity, and cosmetic outcome.

RESULTS

Ten patients with a mean age of 60.3 years underwent NVIS colectomy. The average operating time was 161.3 minutes with a mean blood loss of 56.5 mL. There were no conversions to open surgery. One patient required additional trocar placement. No perioperative complications were encountered. On follow-up, no wound complications were noted and all patients appeared satisfied with their cosmetic outcome. One patient was readmitted for a low-grade fever, but the NVIS technique was not identified as a contributor.

CONCLUSION

NVIS is a safe and feasible minimal access alternative, which improves cosmesis and may decrease complications associated with other minimally invasive techniques. Further analysis in a larger patient population is warranted to support our findings.

Single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiogram

BACKGROUND

While laparoscopy is now the standard for cholecystectomy, recent papers have focused on single-incision approaches. Intraoperative cholangiography remains an integral part of laparoscopic cholecystectomy but has not yet been well described within the single-access literature. We discuss our method of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiograms.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our surgical database was completed. One hundred twenty-three patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were identified (83 standard laparoscopy, 40 single-incision laparoscopy). Patient demographics including age and body mass index (BMI), and indications for surgery, operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, and ability to complete cholangiography were analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients with standard laparoscopy had successful cholangiograms. Two patients did not undergo cholangiography based on a preoperative decision (pregnancy). In the 40 patients who underwent single-incision cholecystectomy, 38 cholangiograms were completed (95%). One patient with acute cholecystitis had a small cystic duct which could not be cannulated. The second had a cystic duct through which the cholangiocatheter could not be advanced. Comparative analysis of patient demographics showed a significant difference in patient age between the two groups, as well as a significantly greater number of patients undergoing single-incision cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis as opposed to acute cholecystitis.

DISCUSSION

Completion of intraoperative cholangiography is an important aspect of cholecystectomy in order to identify choledocholithiasis and verify anatomy. With the advent of single-access laparoscopy, standard operative principles should not be compromised. Cholangiography may provide a safer approach to cholecystectomy when adopting a new technique. We present our technique of single-incision cholecystectomy and routine cholangiography with a 95% success rate. The ability to perform single-incision intraoperative cholangiograms will allow a safe, more minimally invasive approach to cholecystectomy with suspected choledocholithiasis and obviate the need to convert to standard multiport laparoscopy for the sole reason of completing cholangiograms.

On the road to single-site laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: lessons learned from 60 cases

BACKGROUND

Single-site laparoscopic surgery is a promising emerging technique with potential to decrease postoperative pain, reduce port-site complications, and improve cosmetic results. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LapGB) is a procedure that lends itself well to single-site laparoscopic surgery because the surgery is confined to a single region of the body, the need for a larger incision for port implantation and the fact that bariartric patients are more likely to be body image conscious. The procedure is, however, technically challenging and potentially more time consuming and hazardous. To simplify learning, a hybrid technique that used multiple conventional trocars and laparoscopic equipment through a single periumbilical incision while retaining the use of the Nathanson retractor via a separate epigastric incision was developed. The authors' experience and results with this technique are described.

METHODS

This retrospective review describes the prospectively collected data for the first 60 consecutive cases completed using the minimally invasive technique described.

RESULTS

The 60 cases in this study comprised 12 men and 48 women with an average age of 39 years (range 20-59 years). Their average body mass index (BMI) was 39.1 kg/m(2) (range 32-52 kg/m(2)). Four patients (6.7%) needed an additional port either for hemostasis or for access difficulties. Concomitant hiatal hernia repair was performed for 13 patients. Five patients (8.3%) had superficial wound infection requiring oral antibiotic therapy and dressings. No other complications were observed. Overall, the average operating time was 55 min (range 30-160 min). For both surgeons, the learning curve was six cases, with a significant difference in the operating times between the first six cases and the remaining cases (p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' early experience with the minimally invasive LapGB technique shows that it is feasible and safe. It can be used either as a bridging technique to single-site LapGB or on its own as a minimally invasive technique.

Single-access transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy using new curved reusable instruments: a pilot feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The umbilicus can be considered as the embryological opening for single-access laparoscopic procedures. We report on single-access transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy (SATLA) and cholecystectomy (SATLC), performed using new curved reusable instruments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of 30 patients who underwent SATLA and 20 patients who underwent SATLC between May and November 2009 was undertaken. All procedures were performed with an 11-mm nondisposable trocar for the scope, and curved reusable instruments (Karl Storz-Endoskope, Tuttlingen, Germany) placed transumbilically without trocars. Outcome measures were conversion to standard laparoscopy, operative time, scar length, complications, hospital stay, and use of pain medication.

RESULTS

All SATLA patients had acute appendicitis, and SATLC patients had symptomatic gallstones (15), chronic cholecystitis (3), and acute cholecystitis (2). No extraumbilical trocars were necessary. Mean total operative times were 57.3 ± 15.9 min (SATLA) and 73.9 ± 20.1 min (SATLC). Mean laparoscopic times were 39 ± 13.1 min (SATLA) and 57.5 ± 18.9 min (SATLC). Mean scar lengths were 14.8 ± 2.2 mm (SATLA) and 15.8 ± 2.3 mm (SATLC). Five SATLA patients and one SATLC patient developed postoperative complications. Mean hospital stay was 2.9 ± 1.3 days for SATLA patients and 1.8 ± 0.8 days for SATLC patients. Pain medication used was minimal. At the minimum follow-up of 3 months no late complications were registered.

CONCLUSIONS

SATLA and SATLC can be performed safely using curved reusable instruments, which helps avoid the conflict between the surgeon's hands or between the instruments' tips and allows the surgeon to operate in an ergonomic position. The reusable instruments kept the cost similar to that of classic laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy: initial experience and comparison with three-port appendectomy

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic appendectomy usually needs 3 ports, 1 for the videoscope and 2 as working channels. The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy with conventional three-port appendectomy.

METHODS

From October 2008 to January 2009, 35 patients underwent single-port appendectomy (SA). Surgical outcomes such as operation time, number of times of parenteral analgesic injected, complication, and hospital stay of 35 patients receiving SA were analyzed and compared with those of 37 patients receiving three-port appendectomy (TA) during the same period.

RESULTS

Comparing SA with TA, there were no statistically significant differences in operation time (75.9+/-27.4 vs. 66.4+/-21.7 min), times of injected analgesic (0.86+/-1.3 vs. 0.97+/-1.47 times), complication rate (8.6% vs. 2.7%), and hospital stay (3.0+/-1.3 vs. 3.2+/-1.4 d). The most common complication was wound infection (2 cases for SA and 1 for TA). One instance of intra-abdominal fluid accumulation occurred in a patient with perforated appendicitis during SA, and this was managed with image-guided drainage. In contrast to the TA, the abdominal scar in SA was nearly inconspicuous.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed SA to be feasible, and it did not show any difference in postoperative outcomes compared with TA. Moreover, SA can produce scarless surgery without the need for specialized instrumentation.

Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) are both increasingly being used to treat symptomatic gallstones. The present study compared SILC and MLC with respect to outcome in a prospective randomized trial.

METHODS

Seventy patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomized to SILC or MLC (35 in each group). The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation, complications, postoperative analgesic requirements, length of hospital stay, cosmetic result, wound length and time to return to work.

RESULTS

Surgical complications, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements and time to return to work were similar for both procedures. Statistically significant advantages of SILC were a shorter hospital stay, shorter total wound length and better cosmetic appearance. Duration of operation was significantly shorter for MLC.

CONCLUSION

SILC is superior to MLC in terms of cosmetic outcome, but not in postoperative pain and requirement for analgesics.

Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with abdominal wall lift in general surgery: initial experience

BACKGROUND

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) was motivated by the desire to make minimally invasive surgery even more "minimal." We performed gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (GLESS) with abdominal wall lift (AWL) for cholecystectomy and fenestration of liver cyst. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of the techniques.

METHODS

From June to December 2009, 18 cases of gasless laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (GLESC) and 4 cases of fenestration of liver cyst (GLESF) were performed in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong, China. Subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting system, LAP protector, flexible laparoscopes, and bent and articulating instruments were used during the procedures. Clinical data regarding patient demographics, operating time, blood loss, complications, and postoperative hospital stay were collected and analyzed retrospectively in the study.

RESULTS

17 cases of GLESC and 4 cases of GLESF were performed successfully, and 1 case of GLESC was converted to laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy using AWL combined with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Mean body mass index was 23.7 ± 3.1 kg/m(2) for GLESC and 22.9 ± 1.5 kg/m(2) for GLESF. Mean operating time was 64 ± 17 min for GLESC and 101 ± 10 min for GLESF. Mean blood loss was 8 ± 3 ml for GLESC and 24 ± 11 ml for GLESF. Despite minor wound complication, no postoperative complications were observed during mean follow-up of 118 and 95 days for GLESC and GLESF, respectively.

CONCLUSION

GLESS with AWL is safe and feasible for cholecystectomy and fenestration of liver cyst. The techniques provide satisfactory operative field exposure and an easier access method for LESS. Instrument collisions are greatly ameliorated both extra- and intracorporeally through use of flexible laparoscopes and bent and articulating instruments. This may prove to be a better approach for LESS techniques.

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is emerging as a potentially less invasive alternative to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy. As this technique is more widely used, it is important to maintain well-established practices of the critical view of safety (CVS) dissection and intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). We present our initial experience with SILC using CVS dissection and routine IOC.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-four patients with biliary colic were offered SILC, which was performed through the umbilicus. CVS with photo documentation was attained before clipping and transecting the cystic structures. IOC was done using various needle puncture techniques. Assessment of CVS was carried out by independent surgeon review of operative still photos or videos using a 3-point grading scale: visualization of only 2 ductal structures entering the gallbladder; a clear triangle of Calot; and separation of the base of the gallbladder from the cystic plate.

RESULTS

SILC was performed in 54 patients (15 male and 39 female). Six patients required 1 supplementary 3- or 5-mm port. Complete IOC was successful in 50 of 54 patients (92.6%). CVS was achieved at the time of operation in all 54 patients. Photo documentation review confirmed 3 of 3 CVS criteria in 32 (64%) patients, 2 of 3 in 12 patients (24%), 1 of 3 in 3 patients (6%), and 0 in 3 patients (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

As laparoscopic cholecystectomy becomes less invasive, proven safe dissection techniques should be maintained. Dissection to obtain the CVS should be the goal of every patient and IOC can be accomplished in a high percentage of patients. This approach places patient safety considerations foremost in the evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy.

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Single institution experience and literature review

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is a rapidly evolving field as a bridge between traditional laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. We report one of the initial clinical experiences in Japan with this new technique. Four cases of gallbladder diseases were selected for this new technique. A single curved intra-umbilical 25-mm incision was made by pulling out the umbilicus. A 12-mm trocar was placed through an open approach, and the abdominal cavity was explored with a 10-mm semi-flexible laparoscope. Two 5-mm ports were inserted laterally from the laparoscope port. A 2-mm mini-loop retractor was inserted to retract the fundus of the gallbladder. Dissection was performed using an electric cautery hook and an Endograsper roticulator. There were two women and two men with a mean age of 50.5 years (range: 40-61 years). All procedures were completed successfully without any perioperative complications. In all cases, there was no need to extend the skin incision. Average operative time was 88.8 min. Postoperative follow-up didnot reveal any umbilical wound complication. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible and a promising alternative method as scarless abdominal surgery for the treatment of some patients with gallbladder disease.

Single-port laparoscopic surgery

Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single-incision is gaining popularity. The demand from the public for even less invasive procedures will motivate surgeons, industry, and academic centers to explore the possibilities and refine the technology. Although the idea seems quite attractive, there are several technological obstacles that are yet to be conquered by improved technology or additional training. The question of safety has yet to be answered and will require well-designed randomized control trials. Opponents to the approach argue that the size of the single incision (see Table 1) is frequently larger than all the standard laparoscopy incisions combined. On the other hand, proponents remember a similar argument from traditional open surgeons during the initial development of laparoscopy. That argument was quickly discredited when the immediate benefits oflaparoscopy were compared with patients undergoing surgery with small laparotomy incisions. During the development of a new technique, the learning curve exposes patients to risk and society to expense. LESS pioneers appear to have reached a level of comfort with technology and techniques that paves the way for scientific scrutiny. Perhaps, the surgical community will capitalize on this situation with randomized, controlled studies and sound evidence to support or refute the benefits of LESS. If we do not seize this opportunity, patient demand and industry's dual edge message of financial success versus fear of losing referrals will lead to a scenario similar to the development of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the 1990s. Regardless of its future, the surgical community will still benefit from a renewed excitement as surgeons aim to continually reduce the amount of pain and trauma our patients must endure. In addition, technological advances on instrumentation will benefit the field of laparoscopy and improve patient care.

Cholecystectomy by Single Trocar Access (SITRACC): The First Multicenter Study

Background: The advent of endoscopic surgery has radically changed surgery worldwide.The concept of minimally invasive procedures has spread quickly, allowing less pain and more rapid recovery for patients. The authors have developed a device for a new surgical approach, the so-called single trocar access (SITRACC). This study report the first multicenter study of cholecystectomies performed with SITRACC. Methods: Between December 2008 and June 2009, 81 single trocar cholecystectomies were performed in 9 Brazilian surgery centers. Results: The average operative time was 68 minutes. In all, 10 surgeries required 1 additional trocar because of technical problems, and 3 cholecystectomies were converted to standard video laparoscopies. Conclusion: A cholecystectomy using the SITRACC method is feasible and safe.

[The development of laparoscopic technology in light of cholecystectomies performed between 1994 and 2007]

The spread of laparoscopy has required surgeons to familiarize with a completely new surgical method and by today this method has clearly become of major importance in gastrointestinal surgery. The evolution of laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers many good lessons to learn for the purposes of advanced laparoscopic surgeries and surgeons may benefit from this experience in any process of introducing new minimal invasive techniques.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

We have made a retrospective analysis of the data of the cholecystectomies made in the 1st. Department of Surgery, Semmelweis University, right after laparoscopy had become a widely spread, routine surgical method (1994) as well as 13 years later (2007). The data have been processed using the SPSS 16.0 application package. Significance levels have been established with the chi-square probe.

RESULTS

Within the analyzed timeframe we could clearly see a growing use of laparoscopic techniques (52.09% vs. 90.13%) with a growing number of cases (263/304), unchanged average age (approximately 53.5 years) and constant male/female ratio (75/25%). The BMI increased moderately (26.5 vs. 27.6), but the frequency of laparoscopic interventions on extremely obese patients grew (BMI: 25-30 37.93% vs. 44.39%, 30-35 13.79% vs. 20.6% 35-40 6.89% vs. 5.82% and 40 \lt; 0% vs. 1.34%) while the postoperative hospitalization decreased dramatically from 5.9 days to 2.3. In year 1994, patients spent on the average 2.9 days in hospital after a laparoscopic surgery, while in year 2007 nearly 25% of the patients left the hospital 1 day after surgery. The duration of a laparoscopic surgery decreased from 78 minutes to 53, and the occurrence of intraoperative bleeding, gall bladder perforation and gallstone spillage also decreased. The conversion ratio increased from 2.7% to 4.9%. In 3% of the laparoscopic cholecystectomies (10 patients) only 3 ports were used during surgery.

DISCUSSION

As surgeons have come to master the new technique, the previous relative and absolute pros and cons have been revised and at present 90% of cholecystectomies are made using laparoscopy. The data collected in the analysis of laparoscopic techniques can be used to research, learn and eventually introduce Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery.

Optimized transumbilical endoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized comparison of two procedures

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and transumbilical endoscopic surgery (TUES) are being developed to improve minimally invasive surgery further. In 2006, the authors developed TUES using a single triple-channel trocar or single-trocar (ST) technique. To minimize the risk and improve the surgical efficiency further, the procedure was optimized using a two-trocar (TT) technique, with both trocars in the umbilicus. This study compared the clinical results for the TT and ST techniques.

METHODS

For this study, 32 patients with chronic gallbladder disease and indications for cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to undergo surgery with either the TT technique (17 patients) or the ST technique (15 patients). With the TT procedure, two modified 5-mm trocars with small handles were inserted through the navel, one above and one below the umbilicus. Another 2-mm trocar was inserted for a grasper in the right upper abdomen. With the ST procedure, one 15-mm umbilical incision was made for insertion of a previously developed triple-channel trocar to apply the laparoscope, grasper, and dissector individually. Operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative pain were compared between the two procedures.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was significantly shorter with the TT technique (35.71 +/- 9.74 min) than with the ST technique (125.25 +/- 18.9 min (p < 0.001). Use of analgesics after surgery also was less in the TT group than in the ST group (0 vs. 7, respectively; p < 0.05). The postoperative hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both procedures were based on the transumbilical approach, the TT approach was found to be faster and less painful than the ST approach. The difference in the cosmetic result was minimal.

[NOTES and other minimally invasive surgical techniques (hybrid NOTES, NOTUS, SPS, SILS), and their effect on surgical approaches]

A new surgical technique--called Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES)--evolved in 2004. Although numerous problems arose regarding this method--and most of them are unresolved yet--several new articles about the human application have been published. In order to find solutions of a certain extent, new techniques have been developed (hybrid NOTES, NOTUS, SPS, SLIS, etc). Although these could not eliminate difficulties completely, they do provide some solutions in many cases. It is very important for the surgeon of modern days to be familiar with these techniques and analyze them in a critically. Application of these methods requires a review of principles of surgery and flexible endoscopy. Although in many cases these are considered axioms, there data exist in literature of different management principles, as well. It is fundamental that critically review of the basic questions of NOTES (which natural orifice is the best, how to close the viscerotomy, how to avoid infection, who should carry out the NOTES surgery) is carried out in relation of the complications of the original 'gold standard' methods (e.g. frequency of infection or hernia after laparoscopy). Based on human data there is minimal postoperative pain after the NOTES procedure, and patients in general will leave the hospital on the same day. Is such a short postoperative stay enough and can we entirely dismiss drainage after cholecystectomy? Results of the human procedures are adequate to draw further conclusions regarding the new technique. Retrospective analysis of problems occurring during the evolution of laparoscopy can make it possible to avoid mistakes that can be made in the development of NOTES.

A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Surgery of the gallbladder has evolved tremendously over the last century. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for gallbladder removal and the most common laparoscopic procedure worldwide. In recent times, innovative techniques of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) have been applied in gallbladder removal as a step towards even more less-invasive procedures.

DISCUSSION

While NOTES and SILS represent the advent of essentially scarless surgery, limited applications of these technologies in human subjects exists. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of the potential benefits, limitations and risks of these novel techniques.

CONCLUSION

While much remains unknown and unanswered surrounding these procedures, it is clear that extensive research and development with regards to the ethics and the technical aspects of these procedures as well as randomized studies to compare them with traditional laparoscopy are essential.