Hydroxy-propyl-methyl-cellulose is a safe and effective lifting agent for endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps

The Next Generation COVID-19 Antiviral; Niclosamide-Based Inorganic Nanohybrid System Kills SARS-CoV-2

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a serious global threat with surging new variants of concern. Although global vaccinations have slowed the pandemic, their longevity is still unknown. Therefore, new orally administrable antiviral agents are highly demanded. Among various repurposed drugs, niclosamide (NIC) is the most potential one for various viral diseases such as COVID-19, SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), MERS (middle east respiratory syndrome), influenza, RSV (respiratory syncytial virus), etc. Since NIC cannot be effectively absorbed, a required plasma concentration for antiviral potency is hard to maintain, thereby restricting its entry into the infected cells. Such a 60-year-old bioavailability challenging issue has been overcome by engineering with MgO and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), forming hydrophilic NIC-MgO-HPMC, with improved intestinal permeability without altering NIC metabolism as confirmed by parallel artificial membrane permeability assay. The inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV-2  replication is confirmed in the Syrian hamster model to reduce lung injury. Clinical studies reveal that the bioavailability of NIC hybrid drug can go 4 times higher than the intact NIC. The phase II clinical trial shows a dose-dependent bioavailability of NIC from hybrid drug  suggesting its potential applicability as a game changer in achieving the much-anticipated endemic phase.

Improving packed red blood cell storage with a high-viscosity buffered storage solution

BACKGROUND

Massive transfusion with older packed red blood cells is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. As packed red blood cells age, they undergo biochemical and structural changes known as the storage lesion. We developed a novel solution to increase viscosity in stored packed red blood cells. We hypothesized that packed red blood cell storage in this solution would blunt storage lesion formation and mitigate the inflammatory response after resuscitation.

METHODS

Blood was obtained from 8- to 10-week-old C57BL/6 male donor mice or human volunteers and stored as packed red blood cell units for 14 days for mice or 42 days for humans in either standard AS-3 storage solution or EAS-1587, the novel packed red blood cell storage solution. Packed red blood cells were analyzed for microvesicles, cell-free hemoglobin, phosphatidylserine, band-3 protein, glucose utilization, and osmotic fragility. Additional mice underwent hemorrhage and resuscitation with packed red blood cells stored in either AS-3 or EAS-1587. Serum was analyzed for inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

Murine packed red blood cells stored in EAS-1587 demonstrated reductions in microvesicle and cell-free hemoglobin accumulation as well as preserved band-3 expression, increase glucose utilization, reductions in phosphatidylserine expression, and susceptibility to osmotic stress. Serum from mice resuscitated with packed red blood cells stored in EAS-1587 demonstrated reduced proinflammatory cytokines. Human packed red blood cells demonstrated a reduction in microvesicle and cell-free hemoglobin as well as an increase in glucose utilization.

CONCLUSION

Storage of packed red blood cells in a novel storage solution mitigated many aspects of the red blood cell storage lesion as well as the inflammatory response to resuscitation after hemorrhage. This modified storage solution may lead to improvement of packed red blood cell storage and reduce harm after massive transfusion.

Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends

Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps and sessile serrated lesions. Screening colonoscopy and therapeutic polypectomy can potentially reduce colorectal cancer burden by early detection and removal of these polyps, thus decreasing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Most endoscopists are skilled in detecting and removing the vast majority of polyps endoscopically during a routine colonoscopy. Polyps can be considered “complex” based on size, location, morphology, underlying scar tissue, which are not amenable to removal by conventional endoscopic polypectomy techniques. They are technically more challenging to resect and carry an increased risk of complications. Most of these polyps were used to be managed by surgical intervention in the past. Rapid advancement in endoscopic resection techniques has led to a decreasing role of surgery in managing these complex polyps. These endoscopic resection techniques do require an expert in the field and advanced equipment to perform the procedure. In this review, we discuss various advanced endoscopic techniques for the management of complex polyps.

Endoscopic resection is cost-effective compared with laparoscopic resection in the management of complex colon polyps: an economic analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an efficacious treatment for complex colon polyps (CCPs). Many patients are referred for surgical resection because of concerns over procedural safety, incomplete polyp resection, and adenoma recurrence after ER. Efficacy data for both resection strategies are widely available, but a paucity of data exist on the cost-effectiveness of each modality. The aim of this study was to perform an economic analysis comparing ER and laparoscopic resection (LR) strategies in patients with CCP.

METHODS

A decision analysis tree was constructed using decision analysis software. The 2 strategies (ER vs LR) were evaluated in a hypothetical cohort of patients with CCPs. A hybrid Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was used. Patients entered the model after colonoscopic diagnosis at age 50. Under Strategy I, patients underwent ER followed by surveillance colonoscopy at 3 to 6 months and 12 months. Patients with failed ER and residual adenoma at 12 months were referred for LR. Under Strategy II, patients underwent LR as primary treatment. Patients with invasive cancer were excluded. Estimates regarding ER performance characteristics were obtained from a systematic review of published literature. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2012-2013) and the 2012 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases were used to determine the costs and loss of utility. We assumed that all procedures were performed with anesthesia support, and patients with adverse events in both strategies required inpatient hospitalization. Baseline estimates and costs were varied by using a sensitivity analysis through the ranges.

RESULTS

LR was found to be more costly and yielded fewer quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with ER. The cost of ER of a CCP was $5570 per patient and yielded 9.640 QALYs. LR of a CCP cost $18,717 per patient and yielded fewer QALYs (9.577). For LR to be more cost-effective, the thresholds of 1-way sensitivity analyses were (1) technical success of ER for complete resection in <75.8% of cases, (2) adverse event rates for ER > 12%, and (3) LR cost of <$14,000.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that ER is a cost-effective strategy for removal of CCPs. The effectiveness is driven by high technical success and low adverse event rates associated with ER, in addition to the increased cost of LR.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps.

DESIGN

Relevant publications were identified in MEDLINE/EMBASE/Cochrane Central Register for the period 1966-2014. Studies in which ≥20 mm colorectal neoplastic lesions were treated with endoscopic resection were included. Rates of postendoscopic resection surgery due to non-curative resection or adverse events, as well as the rates of complete endoscopic removal, invasive cancer, adverse events, recurrence and mortality, were extracted. Study quality was ascertained according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Forest plot was produced based on random effect models. I2 statistic was used to describe the variation across studies due to heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

50 studies including 6442 patients and 6779 large polyps were included in the analyses. Overall, 503 out of 6442 patients (pooled rate: 8%, 95% CI 7% to 10%, I2=78.6%) underwent surgery due to non-curative endoscopic resection, and 31/6442 (pooled rate: 1%, 95% CI 0.7% to 1.4%, I2=0%) to adverse events. Invasive cancer at histology, non-curative endoscopic resection, synchronous lesions and recurrence accounted for 58%, 28%, 2.2% and 5.9% of all the surgeries, respectively. Endoscopic perforation occurred in 96/6595 (1.5%, 95% CI 1.2% to 1.7%) polyps, while bleeding in 423/6474 (6.5%, 95% CI 5.9% to 7.1%). Overall, 5334 patients entered in surveillance, 502/5836 (8.6%, 95% CI 7.9% to 9.3%) being lost at follow-up. Endoscopic recurrence was detected in 735/5334 patients (13.8%, 95% CI 12.9% to 14.7%), being an invasive cancer in 14/5334 (0.3%, 95% CI 0.1% to 0.4%). Endoscopic treatment was successful in 664/735 cases (90.3%, 95% CI 88.2% to 92.5%). Mortality related with management of large polyps was reported in 5/6278 cases (0.08%, 95% CI 0.01% to 0.15%).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection of large polyps appeared to be an extremely effective and safe intervention. However, an adequate endoscopic surveillance is necessary for its long-term efficacy.

Improved Techniques for Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) in Colorectal Adenoma

Background

Endoscopic therapy of colorectal adenomas and early cancers is a standard method. Besides oncological criteria, the method is limited by polyp location, size, and texture.

Method

Based on the current literature, technical modifications and developments in endoscopic mucosal resection are described.

Results

Numerous approaches exist to improve the conditions of resection, including optimisation of mucosal elevation and modification of techniques, tools, and devices.

Conclusion

Endoscopic therapy of sessile and flat colorectal polyps remains a challenge. Some of the presented modifications can help to address this challenge.

Endoscopic mucosal resection

EMR has become an established therapeutic option for premalignant and early-stage GI malignancies, particularly in the esophagus and colon. EMR can also aid in the diagnosis and therapy of subepithelial lesions localized to the muscularis mucosa or submucosa. Several dedicated EMR devices are available to facilitate these procedures. Adverse event rates, particularly bleeding and perforation, are higher after EMR relative to other basic endoscopic interventions but lower than adverse event rates for ESD. Endoscopists performing EMR should be knowledgeable and skilled in managing potential adverse events resulting from EMR.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric neoplastic lesions: a western series

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been found to be effective and safe for endoscopic removal of early gastric neoplasia in large Asian series. However, few data are available on the use of ESD in western countries. We assessed the efficacy of ESD performed in patients with early gastric neoplastic lesions.

METHODS

We analyzed prospectively collected data of consecutive patients who underwent the ESD procedure for gastric neoplasia at a single Italian center. Procedure-related outcomes, including complete histological resection rate (i.e. R0 resection), immediate and late complication rate, procedure-related mortality, and follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients underwent gastric ESD. The en-bloc removal of lesions was successful in all cases, whereas R0 was achieved in 39 (92.8%) patients. A bleeding episode was observed in three (7.1%) patients, which was successfully managed by endoclip positioning. No perforations and procedure-related deaths were observed. The median follow-up period was 19 months (range: 9-53). A small residue of adenomatous lesion and a recurrent dysplastic lesion were removed by endoscopic mucosal resection in two (5%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Our data are comparable with those of larger Asian series. Use of ESD for removal of gastric neoplastic lesions should be implemented in western countries.

Warning for unprincipled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment strategy

Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is generally indicated for laterally spreading tumors (LST) >2 cm in diameter. However, the segmentation of adenomatous parts does not affect the histopathological diagnosis and completeness of cure. Thus, possible indications for piecemeal EMR are both adenomatous homogenous-type granular-type LST (LST-G) and LST-G as carcinoma in adenoma without segmentalizing the carcinomatous part. Diagnosis of the pit pattern using magnifying endoscopy is essential for determining the correct treatment and setting segmentation borders. In contrast, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is indicated for lesions requiring endoscopic en bloc excision, as it is difficult to use the snare technique for en bloc excisions such as in non-granular-type LST (LST-NG), especially for the pseudodepressed type, tumors with a type VI pit pattern, shallow invasive submucosal carcinoma, largedepressed tumors and large elevated lesions, which are often malignant (e.g. nodular mixed-type LST-G). Other lesions, such as intramucosal tumor accompanied by submucosal fibrosis, induced by biopsy or peristalsis of the lesion; sporadic localized tumors that occur due to chronic inflammation, including ulcerative colitis; and local residual early carcinoma after endoscopic treatment, are also indications for ESD. In clinical practice, an efficient endoscopic treatment with segregation of ESD from piecemeal EMR should be carried out after a comprehensive evaluation of the completeness of cure, safety, clinical simplicity, and cost-benefit, based on an accurate preoperative diagnosis.

Endoscopic resection of large colon polyps

Endoscopic resection, including polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection, is the preferred treatment method of large colorectal polyps. Its safety and efficacy have been shown. Endoscopic removal techniques are important because they provide a resection specimen for precise histopathologic staging to further direct diagnosis, prognosis, and management decisions. Used according to its indications, it provides curative resection and obviates the higher morbidity, mortality, and cost associated with alternative surgical treatment.

Submucosal injection of 0.4% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose facilitates endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastrointestinal tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Submucosal injection of a viscoelastic solution prolongs submucosal lift, thus, facilitating endoscopic mucosal resection. Our objective was to assess the safety and clinical effectiveness of 0.4% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) as a submucosal injectant for endoscopic mucosal resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study was conducted at 2 academic institutions in Brazil. Eligible participants included patients with early gastrointestinal tumors larger than 10 mm. Outcomes evaluated included complete resection rates, volume of HPMC injected, duration of the submucosal cushion as assessed visually, histology of the resected leisons, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Over a 12-month period, 36 eligible patients with superficial neoplastic lesions (stomach 14, colon 11, rectum 5, esophagus 3, duodenum 3) were prospectively enrolled in the study. The mean size of the resected specimen was 20.4 mm (10 to 60 mm). The mean volume of 0.4% HPMC injected was 10.7 mL (range 4 to 35 mL). The mean duration of the submucosal fluid cushion was 27 minutes (range 9 to 70 min). Complete resection was successfully completed in 89%. Five patients (14%) developed immediate bleeding requiring endoclip and APC application. Esophageal perforation occurred in 1 patient requiring surgical intervention. There were no local or systemic adverse events related to HPMC use over the follow-up period (mean 2.2 mo).

CONCLUSION

HPMC solution (0.4%) provides an effective submucosal fluid cushion and is safe for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal neoplastic lesions.

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps

PURPOSE

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection has been used to treat superficial esophageal and gastric cancers. Efficacy data in the colon are limited. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique in the treatment of sessile polyps and lateral spreading tumors in the colorectum.

METHODS

Two-hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients with sessile polyps or lateral spreading tumors >or=20 mm were treated between January 2000 and December 2007.

RESULTS

A total of 146 sessile polyps and 136 lateral spreading tumors were treated with cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection. Complications occurred in 22 (8.6%) patients (5.5% in sessile polyps and 10.3% in lateral spreading tumors). Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 21 (7%) of polypectomies (6% in sessile polyps and 10% in lateral spreading tumors); all were controlled endoscopically. Postcoagulation syndrome occurred in 1 patient with lateral spreading tumor. No perforation occurred. Invasive adenocarcinoma was found in 35 patients, of whom 15 underwent surgery. Endoscopic follow-up in 200 patients with 216 adenomas for a median of 12.1 months showed recurrence in 8 (4%) who were treated with resection and/or ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection is an effective treatment for sessile polyps and lateral spreading tumors. A disadvantage of the technique is that the resection is piecemeal. Close surveillance provides the opportunity for additional tissue ablation, when required, to achieve complete lesion removal.