Development of an articulating ultrasonically activated device for laparoscopic surgery

Treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infection in the groin with ultrasound debridement: A case report

Introduction

Prosthetic graft infection (PGI) is associated with low patient survival rates. The effectiveness of ultrasound debridement in chronic wound healing has been previously reported; however, data on the use of ultrasound technology and its effect on the treatment of PGI are still lacking. We report a case in which PGI in the groin was managed by graft removal using ultrasound debridement.

Presentation of case

A 70-year-old man was diagnosed with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and underwent a femoral-femoral bypass with a polytetrafluoroethylene graft. Eight months postoperatively, he developed an infection at the femoral incision site. Graft removal was performed using ultrasound debridement. The estimated blood loss was 10 mL. The wound healed, and the patient has remained in good health for 2 years postoperatively.

Discussion

When the ultrasonic probe is applied to the wound, ultrasonic energy penetrates into the tissue, and a fibrinolytic action removes necrotic or infected tissue without removing healthy tissue, thereby minimizing bleeding. Using this technique, we were able to perform effective debridement at not only the wound but also the anastomosis.

Conclusion

It is our opinion that this technique can be used to achieve adequate debridement with little bleeding during graft removal and may provide a new option for the treatment of PGI.

Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted surgery and laparotomy for treating locally advanced distal gastric antral cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety, feasibility and mid-term results of laparoscopy-assisted surgery in the treatment of locally advanced gastric antral cancer. The clinical data of 50 patients who received laparoscopy-assisted surgery (Group A) and 62 patients who were treated by conventional laparotomy (Group B) from August 2009 to January 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical incision length, the volume of blood loss, the intestinal function recovery time, the postoperative complications, the postoperative 1- and 3-year cumulative survival rates and the average survival time in the two groups were observed. The results of the two groups were compared using the χ² test for the enumeration data, a t-test for the numerical data and a Wilcoxon rank sum test for the skewed data. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier method of single factor analysis was utilized to comwpare the 1- and 3-year cumulative survival rates, as well as the average survival time of the two groups. The results indicated that the duration of surgery for Group A was significantly longer compared with that of Group B (P<0.05); however, the incision length and the volume of intraoperative blood loss in Group A were significantly smaller compared with those of Group B (P<0.01). Furthermore, in Group A, the recovery of intestinal function was more rapid and the time spent in hospital was shorter. However, between Groups A and B, the respective number of dissected lymph nodes (16.3 and 17.2), 1-year survival rates (86.0 and 88.6%) and 3-year survival rates (52.6 and 53.7%) were not significantly different (P<0.05). The results indicate that laparoscopy-assisted surgery is a safe approach for the treatment of locally advanced gastric antral cancer and has beneficial treatment effects. Laparoscopy-assisted surgery is advantageous compared with laparotomy, due to the smaller incision length and reductions in intraoperative blood loss, invasiveness, postoperative recovery time and the number of complications.

Minimally invasive single-site surgery for the digestive system: A technological review

Minimally Invasive Single Site (MISS) surgery is a better terminology to explain the novel concept of scarless surgery, which is increasingly making its way into clinical practice. But, there are some difficulties. We review the existing technologies for MISS surgery with regards to single-port devices, endoscope and camera, instruments, retractors and also the future perspectives for the evolution of MISS surgery. While we need to move ahead cautiously and wait for the development of appropriate technology, we believe that the “Ultimate form of Minimally Invasive Surgery” will be a hybrid form of MISS surgery and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery, complimented by technological innovations from the fields of robotics and computer-assisted surgery.