Perforation into the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer is not associated with major complications or oncological compromise

[Transanal Tumor Resection: Indication, Surgical Technique and Management of Complications]

Transanal resection procedures are special operations for the minimally invasive treatment of rectal tumours. Apart from benign tumours, this procedure is suitable for the excision of low-risk T1 rectal carcinomas, if these can be completely removed (R0 resection). With stringent patient selection, very good oncological results are achieved. Various international trials are currently evaluating whether local resection procedures are oncologically sufficient if there is a complete or near complete response after neoadjuvant radio-/chemotherapy. Numerous studies have shown that the functional results and the postoperative quality of life after local resection are excellent, especially considering the well-known functional deficits of alternative operations, such as low anterior or abdominoperineal resection.Severe complications are very rare. Most complications, such as urinary retention or subfebrile temperatures, are minor in nature. Suture line dehiscences are usually clinically unremarkable. Major complications comprise significant haemorrhage and the opening of the peritoneal cavity. The latter must be recognized intraoperatively and can usually be managed by primary suture. Infection, abscess formation, rectovaginal fistula, injury of the prostate or even urethra are extremely rare complications.

Complex Procedures in Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: Intraperitoneal Entry, Ultra Large Rectal Tumors, High Lesions, and Resection in the Anal Canal

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) allows the local excision of rectal tumors and achieves lower morbidity and mortality rates than total mesorectal excision. TEM can treat lesions up to 18 to 20 cm from the anal verge, obtaining good oncological results in T1 stage cancers and preserving sphincter function. TEM is technically demanding. Large lesions (>5 cm), those with high risk of perforation into the peritoneal cavity, those in the upper rectum or the rectosigmoid junction, and those in the anal canal are specially challenging. Primary suture after peritoneal perforation during TEM is safe and it does not necessarily require the creation of a protective stoma. We recommend closing the wall defect in all cases to avoid the risk of inadvertent perforation. It is important to identify these complex lesions promptly to transfer them to reference centers. This article summarizes complex procedures in TEM.

Management of intra- and postoperative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a safe procedure and the rates of intra- and postoperative complications are low. The information in the literature on the management of these complications is limited, and so their importance may be either under- or overestimated (which may in turn lead to under- or overtreatment). The present article reviews the most relevant series of TEM procedures and their complications and describes various approaches to their management.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the literature, including TEM series of more than 150 cases each. We analyzed the population characteristics, surgical variables and intraoperative and postoperative complications.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 1043 records were found. After review, 1031 were excluded. The review therefore includes 12 independent cohorts of TEM procedures with a total of 4395 patients. The rate of perforation into the peritoneal cavity was 5.1%, and conversion to abdominal approach was required in 0.8% of cases. The most frequent complications were acute urinary retention (AUR, 4.9%) and rectal bleeding (2.2%). Less common complications included abscesses (0.99%) and rectovaginal fistula (0.62%). Mortality rates were low, with a mean value of 0.29%.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness and knowledge of TEM complications and their management can play an important role in their treatment and patient safety. Here, we present a review of the most important TEM series and their complication rates and describe various approaches to their management.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of early colorectal neoplasms using an endoscopic submucosal dissection knife: a retrospective multicenter study

Background and study aims  Endoscopic full-thickness resection allows resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasms not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection techniques, due to their location, presence of submucosal fibrosis, or suspected deep mural invasion. It is typically achieved using a dedicated over-the-scope device (full-thickness resection device or FTRD). The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic full-thickness resection using an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) knife. Patients and methods  Consecutive patients who underwent full-thickness endoscopic resection at six tertiary care centers from August 2010 to June 2017 were retrospectively included. We conducted a comparative analysis of patient characteristics, technical success, adverse events, and time to discharge between patients treated by a full-thickness resection using an ESD knife. Results  Twenty-one procedures were performed using an ESD knife. En-bloc resection and R0 resection rates were 95.2 % and 65 %, respectively. Clinical symptoms of perforation occurred in 66.7 %. There was no need for surgery or additional endoscopic procedures. Conclusion  Endoscopic full-thickness resection of early colorectal neoplasms using an ESD knife might be feasible and safe. It allows complete resection of lesions with no limitation in size. The technique may be preferable to an other-the-scope resection device in lesions larger than 20 mm, and to surgery in selected cases of low-risk T1 colorectal carcinomas, non-lifting adenomas, submucosal tumors, or technically challenging lesion locations.

Evolution of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision

Minimally invasive techniques continue to transform the field of colorectal surgery. Because traditional surgical approaches for rectal cancer are associated with significant mortality and morbidity, developing less invasive approaches to this disease is paramount. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), commonly known as "no incision surgery," represents the ultimate minimally invasive approach to disease. Although transgastric and transvaginal approaches for NOTES surgery were the initially explored, a transrectal approach for colorectal disease is intuitive given that it makes use of the resected organ for transluminal access. Furthermore, the transanal approach allows for improved, precise visualization of the presacral mesorectal plane compared with an abdominal viewpoint, particularly in the narrow, male pelvis. Finally, experience with existing transanal platforms that have been used for decades for local excision of rectal disease made the development of a transanal approach to total mesorectal excision (TME) feasible. Here, we will review the evolution of minimally invasive and transanal surgical techniques that allowed for the development of transanal TME and its introduction into clinical practice.

The outcomes of two robotic platforms performing transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal neoplasia: a case series of 21 patients

Colorectal cancer remains the third most common cancer effecting adults. Surgical guidelines recommend transanal excision of early rectal neoplasia up to 8 cm from the anal verge. A retrospective review of two novel approaches for transanal robotic local excision with R0 resections of rectal cancers which was, on average, higher than 8 cm. Twenty-one cases of robotic assisted transanal surgery for early stage disease (T0-T1, N0) were reviewed. The first 10 cases performed with the da Vinci^® Si robotic platform between 2013 and 2016, and the first 11 cases performed using the Flex^® Medrobotics platform between August 2017 and August 2018. The average distance from the anal verge was 11.1 cm and 9.5 cm for the da Vinci^® Si and Flex^® Colorectal Drive, respectively. The average operative time was 167.6 min for the da Vinci^® Si and 110.1 min for the Flex^® Colorectal Drive; the average EBL was 37.5 cc and 9.1 cc for the da Vinci^® Si and Flex^® Colorectal Drive. In the da Vinci^® series, four cases required intraoperative conversion. In the Flex^® series, one case was aborted due to unfavorable robotic positioning. All margins were histologically negative when surgically complete with no recurrences to date. Transanal robotic surgery may provide a method to address rectal lesions farther from the anal verge than previously described. The Flex^® Colorectal Drive platform may provide superior ability to navigate the nonlinear anatomy of the rectum and distal sigmoid colon.

Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Local Excision of Benign and Malignant Rectal Neoplasia: Outcomes From 200 Consecutive Cases With Midterm Follow Up

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the outcomes for 200 consecutive transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) local excision (LE) for rectal neoplasia.

BACKGROUND

TAMIS is an advanced transanal platform that can result in high quality LE of rectal neoplasia.

METHODS

Consecutive patients from July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2015 from a prospective institutional registry were analyzed. Indication for TAMIS LE was endoscopically unresectable benign lesions or histologically favorable early rectal cancers. The primary endpoints were resection quality, neoplasia recurrence, and oncologic outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to describe disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma that did not receive immediate salvage radical surgery.

RESULTS

There were 200 elective TAMIS LE procedures performed in 196 patients for 90 benign and 110 malignant lesions. Overall, a 7% margin positivity and 5% fragmentation rate was observed. The mean operative time for TAMIS was 69.5 minutes (SD 37.9). Postoperative morbidity was recorded in 11% of patients, with hemorrhage (9%), urinary retention (4%), and scrotal or subcutaneous emphysema (3%) being the most common. The mean follow up was 14.4 months (SD 17.4). Local recurrence occurred in 6%, and distant organ metastasis was noted in 2%. Mean time to local recurrence for malignancy was 16.9 months (SD 13.2). Cumulative DFS for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma was 96%, 93%, and 84% at 1-, 2-, and 3-years.

CONCLUSIONS

For carefully selected patients, TAMIS for local excision of rectal neoplasia is a valid option with low morbidity that maintains the advantages of organ preservation.

Cirugía mínimamente invasiva transanal (TAMIS): técnica y resultados de la experiencia inicial

Antecedentes: la cirugía transanal endoscópica es un abordaje mínimamente invasivo recientemente descrito, que provee una exposición superior y permite el acceso a las lesiones del recto en toda su extensión. Además, provee un riesgo menor de compromiso de los márgenes de resección, menores tasas de recurrencia y una menor morbimortalidad en comparación con la escisión transanal convencional o las remociones endoscópicas. Objetivos: se pretende describir la experiencia inicial y los resultados con la cirugía transanal mínimamente invasiva (transanal minimally invasive surgery, TAMIS) en términos de resecciones completas y posibles complicaciones relacionadas con el procedimiento. Materiales y métodos: esta una serie de casos con un seguimiento prospectivo de los pacientes con TAMIS. Se analizaron los resultados de 27 pacientes intervenidos en varios centros de Medellín, Colombia, entre enero de 2012 y diciembre de 2016, realizados con cirugía laparoscópica monopuerto (single-port laparoscopic surgery, SILS) (21 casos) o el GelPOINT® Path (6 casos), junto con el apoyo de la óptica del laparoscopio (16 pacientes) y del endoscopio flexible (11 pacientes). Resultados: se realizaron 27 TAMIS en el mismo número de pacientes, 10 mujeres (37 %) y 17 hombres fueron evaluados. Se realizó un seguimiento a los pacientes durante aproximadamente 12 meses, en promedio 32 meses. La edad promedio fue de 68 años (52-83 años). El tamaño promedio del tumor fue de 5,3 cm (2-9 cm) y la distancia promedio desde el margen anal fue de 7 cm (5-9 cm) Las complicaciones posoperatorias se dieron en 6 casos (22 %) Una perforación rectal se corrigió por vía laparoscópica en el mismo acto quirúrgico y otra por la misma vía transanal. Una estenosis rectal se manejó con dilatación digital, y hubo un caso de sangrado rectal menor, uno de retención urinaria y un paciente presentó un cáncer rectal avanzado a los tres meses de la resección con margen microscópico positivo (4 %). No hubo reingresos. La mortalidad por la intervención fue nula. La patología operatoria reportó la presencia de adenoma de bajo grado en 3 casos (11 %), de alto grado en 11 (41 %), adenocarcinoma in situ en 6 (22 %), tumor neuroendocrino en 5 pacientes (18 %), 1 caso de fibrosis cicatricial (4 %) y 1 de leiomioma (4 %). Limitaciones: los resultados no son extrapolables a la población general debido al poco número de intervenciones y la ejecución limitada a solo dos autores. Conclusiones: en nuestra experiencia inicial, TAMIS es un procedimiento mínimamente invasivo con una baja morbilidad posoperatoria, es curativa para lesiones benignas y para pacientes seleccionados con cáncer temprano.

Robotic transanal microsurgery for high early rectal neoplasia (T0-T1, N0 lesions), case series of 10 patients

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

In 2017, an estimated 39 910 people will receive a new diagnosis of rectal cancer. Current surgical guidelines limit transanal excision of early rectal neoplasia to 8 cm from the anal verge. We report that R0 resection of higher rectal cancers is possible using transanal robotic microsurgery.

METHODS/INTERVENTIONS

Ten cases of robotic assisted transanal surgery for early stage disease (T0-T1, N0) between 2013 and 2016 were reviewed.

RESULTS/OUTCOMES

All cases were diagnosed preoperatively with colonoscopy, and the average distance from the anal verge was 11.1 cm. The average operative time was 167 minutes, and the average blood loss was 37.5 cc. Four cases required intraoperative conversion; one conversion required robotic abdominal access to repair a proctotomy. All margins were histologically negative, and 6-month follow-up showed no recurrences.

CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION

Transanal robotic surgery may provide the colorectal surgeon a method to address rectal lesions farther from the anal verge.

Peritoneal perforation during transanal endoscopic microsurgery is not associated with significant short-term complications

BACKGROUND

In patients treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), breach of the peritoneal cavity is a feared intraoperative challenge. Our aim is to analyze predictors and short-term outcomes of patients with peritoneal perforation (TEM-P) when compared to similar patients with no peritoneal compromise (TEM-N).

METHODS

At St. Paul's Hospital, demographic, surgical, pathologic, and follow-up data for all patients treated by TEM is maintained in a prospectively populated database. A retrospective review was performed and two groups were established for comparison: TEM-P and TEM-N. Statistical analysis was performed using student's t or chi-squared test, where appropriate.

RESULTS

Of 619 patients treated by TEM between 2007 and 2016, 39 (6%) patients were in the TEM-P group and 580 (94%) in the TEM-N group. There were no differences between the groups in patient age, gender, histology, or tumor size. Patients who had peritoneal perforations had more proximal lesions (11 vs. 7 cm, p < 0.0001), anterior lesions (56 vs. 43%, p < 0.05), and longer operations (80 vs. 51 min, p < 0.005). While most defects were closed endoluminally, 2 patients with perforation were converted to transabdominal surgery. There was a difference in overall hospital stay with TEM-P patients staying on average 2 days in hospital with fewer patients managed as day surgery (31 vs. 73%, p < 0.0001). There were no mortalities or significant 30-day complications in the TEM-P group and only one patient required readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

The St. Paul's Hospital TEM experience suggests patients with peritoneal breach during TEM can be safely managed with outcomes similar to patients without peritoneal entry. Proximal, anterior lesions are at highest risk of peritoneal perforation.

How to deal with rectal lesions more than 15 cm from the anal verge through transanal endoscopic microsurgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess postoperative morbidity and mortality in tumors with a proximal margin 15 cm or more from the anal verge operated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

METHODS

This observational study of consecutive rectal tumor patients undergoing TEM was carried out from July 2004 to June 2017. We compared the results of rectal tumors at distances of ≥15 cm (group A) and <15 cm (group B) from the anal verge.

RESULTS

During the study period 667 patients were included: 118 in group A and 549 in group B. In the comparative analysis there were no significant differences in morbidity (p = 0.23), mortality (p = 0.32) or free margin involvement (p = 0.545). Differences were observed in terms of lesion size (p < 0.001), surgical time (p < 0.001) and peritoneal cavity perforation, which were all increased in group A.

CONCLUSION

TEM for lesions in the rectosigmoid junction is feasible and is not associated with higher morbidity or mortality.

Local excision for rectal cancer: a minimally invasive option

Transanal excision (TAE) with conventional retractors and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) are two well established minimally invasive surgical options for the treatment of selected rectal cancers. TEM is nowadays considered the standard of care for the transanal excision of rectal tumors, since it is associated with significantly better quality of excision and lower rates of recurrence than TAE. When compared with rectal resection and total mesorectal excision, TEM has lower postoperative morbidity and better functional outcomes, with similar long-term survival rates in selected early rectal cancers. More recently, transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) has been developed as an alternative to TEM. Possible benefits of TAMIS are under evaluation.

Peritoneal perforation is less a complication than an expected event during transanal endoscopic microsurgery: experience from 194 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

Indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) have been extended to technically challenging tumors, which may be associated with an increased risk of peritoneal perforation (PP). The aim of the present study was to investigate the occurrence, management and outcome of PP in patients having TEM.

METHODS

All the patients who had TEM for rectal adenoma or adenocarcinoma in our unit were included. Patients in whom PP occurred (Group A) were compared to those without PP (Group B).

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2015, 194 TEM (116 men, median age 66 [range 21-100] years) were divided into Groups A (n = 28, 14%) and B (n = 166). The latter group included four patients, in whom a laparoscopy did not confirm suspicion of PP made during TEM. In 2 of 28 patients (7%), the diagnosis of PP was made postoperatively during reoperation for peritonitis. For the 26 other patients (93%), routine exploratory laparoscopy was performed with suture of the peritoneal defect on the pouch of Douglas in 24 cases and a rectal suture alone in 2 cases. Independent predictive factors for PP were: distance from the anal verge >10 cm (OR = 3.6), circumferential tumor (OR = 3.0) and anterior location (OR = 2.7). Hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A (7.5 [3-31] days) than in Group B (4 [1-38] days; p < 0.0001), whereas there was no significant difference regarding postoperative morbidity and recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that PP is not a very rare event during TEM, especially in anterior, circumferential and/or high rectal tumors. Laparoscopic treatment of PP is feasible and safe. The occurrence of PP is not associated with poor oncologic results.

Establishing the learning curve of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an endoscopic operating platform for local excision of rectal neoplasms. However, it may be technically demanding, and its learning curve has yet to be adequately defined. The objective of this study was to determine the number of TAMIS procedures for the local excision of rectal neoplasm required to reach proficiency.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

All TAMIS cases performed from 07/2009 to 12/2016 at a single high-volume tertiary care institution for local excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia were identified from a prospective database. A cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was performed to determine the number of cases required to reach proficiency. The main proficiency outcome was rate of margin positivity (R1 resection). The acceptable and unacceptable R1 rates were defined as the R1 rate of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM-10%) and traditional transanal excision (TAE-26%), which was obtained from previously published meta-analyses. Comparisons of patient, tumor, and operative characteristics before and after TAMIS proficiency were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 254 TAMIS procedures were included in this study. The overall R1 resection rate was 7%. The indication for TAMIS was malignancy in 57%. CUSUM analysis reported that TAMIS reached an acceptable R1 rate between 14 and 24 cases. Moving average plots also showed that the mean operative times stabilized by proficiency gain. The mean lesion size was larger after proficiency gain (3.0 cm (SD 1.5) vs. 2.3 cm (SD 1.3), p = 0.008). All other patient, tumor, and operative characteristics were similar before and after proficiency gain.

CONCLUSIONS

TAMIS for local excision of rectal neoplasms is a complex procedure that requires a minimum of 14-24 cases to reach an acceptable R1 resection rate and lower operative duration.

Indications and Outcomes From 32 Consecutive Patients for the Treatment of Rectal Lesions by Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, perioperative morbidity, and short-term outcomes of the transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) technique.

METHODS

This is a descriptive review of prospectively collected data from 32 consecutive patients who underwent TAMIS procedures in our colorectal unit over a 40-month period. GelPOINT Path port was used in all cases. Demographic data, indications, tumor characteristics, morbidity, and follow-up data were collected. Primary endpoints included feasibility, safety, perioperative morbidity, and resection quality.

RESULTS

Fifteen adenomas, 12 carcinomas, 1 gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and 1 neuroendocrine tumor were locally excised. Additionally, 3 pelvic abscesses were drained transanally using the TAMIS port. Mean distance from the anal verge was 5.6 ± 1.5 cm. Early postoperative complications occurred in 22%, with only one case of major complication (3.1%) requiring reoperation, and no postoperative mortality. Four carcinomas were understaged (33.3%) and 1 adenoma overstaged (6.7%) preoperatively. Three carcinomas were not suspected preoperatively (25%). Microscopic positive lateral margin was found in one case, and no affected deep margin was found. Fragmentation rate was 6.9%, 2 cases, both lesions over 20 cm². In cases of fit patients with high-risk carcinomas, 2 underwent immediate salvage surgery and another 2 refused and were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. With a median follow-up of 26 months, the overall recurrence rate was 10.3%, 1 adenoma and 2 carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

TAMIS seems to be a safe and reproducible procedure for local excision of well-selected rectal lesions with low morbidity and good functional outcomes.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was developed by Professor Gerhard Buess 30 years ago at the dawn of minimally invasive surgery. TEM utilizes a closed proctoscopic system whereby endoluminal surgery is accomplished with high-definition magnification, constant CO2 insufflation, and long-shafted instruments. The end result is a more precise excision and closure compared to conventional instrumentation. Virtually any benign lesion can be addressed with this technology; however, proper patient selection is paramount when using it for cancer.

Practice parameters for early rectal cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines

The introduction of new technologies for diagnosis and screening programs led to an increasing rate of early detection of colorectal cancer. This, associated with the evolution of endoscopic techniques of local excision, led to the assessment of new strategies to reduce morbidity related to treatment, especially for early rectal cancer (ERC). Nevertheless, the definition of ERC and its staging and treatment algorithm are still under debate. The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery developed practice guidelines to provide recommendations on the diagnosis, staging and treatment of ERC. A systematic review on the topic was performed by a multidisciplinary group of experts selected based on their clinical and scientific expertise in endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance and surgery, with the aid of an external international audit.

Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal entry during transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) can usually be managed transanally with full-thickness suture closure by experienced operators. The preliminary safety of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) has been demonstrated, but the reported experience with upper rectal tumors is limited. The incidence and management of peritoneal entry during transanal endoscopic surgery across various platforms have not been previously evaluated.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all transanal endoscopic resections performed at a single institution between January 2008 and December 2014 was conducted. Cases with and without peritoneal entry were evaluated with respect to transanal platform used, surgical indication, size, location and distance from the anal verge, and incidence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 78 transanal endoscopic procedures were performed on 76 patients using the rigid transanal endoscopic operation (TEO, 65.4 %), TEM (26.9 %), and TAMIS platform (7.7 %). The most common surgical indication included endoscopically unresectable adenomas (50 %). The average distance of lesions from the anal verge (AV) was 9.6 cm (range 4-20 cm). Peritoneal entry occurred in 22 cases (28.2 %). Platform used (TAMIS vs. rigid, p < 0.05), mean distance from the AV (p < 0.0001), location along the rectum (p = 0.01), and mean specimen size (p = 0.01) were associated with a higher likelihood of peritoneal entry. All rectal defects associated with peritoneal entry were successfully closed transanally except for two (TEM and TEO) cases that required conversion to laparoscopic low anterior resection and laparoscopic Hartmann's, respectively. There were four TAMIS cases that required conversion to TEO platforms.

CONCLUSION

In this high-risk TEM, TEO, and TAMIS series (one-third of rectal lesions located in the upper rectum), 91 % of all peritoneal entries were managed transanally without increased morbidity. TAMIS for upper rectal lesions was associated with a high risk of complicated peritoneal entry requiring conversion to a rigid platform.

[Management of complications in anal and transanal tumor surgery]

Anal and transanal tumor operations are safe and are associated with a very low morbidity. Perianal and anal lesions as well as low rectal tumors can be excised by direct exposure using an anal retractor. For lesions situated in the middle or upper third of the rectum, special instrumentation, such as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) should be used to avoid unnecessary R1 resections. Fatal complications are extremely rare and most complications, such as urinary retention or temporary subfebrile temperatures, are minor. Suture line dehiscences are usually clinically unremarkable. Major complications comprise significant hemorrhage and opening of the peritoneal cavity. The latter must be recognized intraoperatively and can usually be managed by primary suturing. Infections, abscess formation, rectovaginal fistula, injury of the prostate or even urethra are extremely rare complications.

Local resection of early rectal cancer

The introduction of the National Danish screening programme for colorectal cancer will result in the detection of more early rectal cancers (ERC), which may be considered for local excision. For the low risk≤T1 cancer, the oncological outcome at local excision in smaller patient series has shown similar results to conventional surgery, but with a significantly lower rate of serious complications, morbidity and mortality. The challenge is correct preoperative staging, and a meticulous systematic histopathological staging of the excised specimen to distinguish the low risk from high-risk cases, where rescue surgery may be considered. The establishment of a regional or national clinical database is necessary to improve the local treatment of ERC.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with entrance into the peritoneal cavity: is it safe?

BACKGROUND

Relative contraindications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery include high, anterior-based lesions for full-thickness excisions because of worries about entering the peritoneal cavity. Concerns exist regarding safety and oncological outcome.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery excisions with entry into the peritoneal cavity and compared them with those that did not to address our hypothesis that entry is safe with no ill infectious or oncological consequences.

DESIGN

This single-institution retrospective review uses a prospectively maintained database.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a tertiary colorectal surgery referral center.

PATIENTS

From 1997 to 2012, we identified 303 patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery resections, with 26 patients having entrance into the peritoneal cavity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Perioperative data, postoperative morbidities, delayed morbidities, and oncological outcomes were the primary outcomes measured.

RESULTS

Of 26 patients, there were 8 women with a mean age of 67.5 years. Mean BMI was 31 kg/m, and ASA class was III or IV in 69%. Mean superior border of the lesion was 10.4 cm (4.5-16). Forty-eight percent had anterior-based lesions. Anterior location, level from anorectal ring, and diagnosis of cancer were significantly higher in the peritoneal entry group (p = 0.003, p = 0.007, and p = 0.007). Preoperative diagnoses included 16 adenocarcinomas, 8 polyps, and 2 carcinoid tumors. Thirteen patients had preoperative chemoradiation. Median estimated blood loss was 15 mL (5-400), and 3 patients underwent diversions. Median time to discharge was 3 days (2-10). There were no perioperative mortalities. Median follow-up time was 21.0 months. There was 1 local recurrence (3.8%), and there was no development of carcinomatosis.

LIMITATIONS

This review was limited by its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

High anterior location rectal lesions should be considered candidates for transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision in experienced hands. After obtaining considerable transanal endoscopic microsurgery experience, our use of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in a high-risk patient population allowed us to definitively treat 88% of patients without an abdominal operation and the need for a temporary or permanent colostomy. Theoretic concerns of abscess or carcinomatosis were not experienced (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A154).

Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign and malignant rectal neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS), an alternative technique to transanal endoscopic microsurgery, was developed in 2009. Herein, we describe our initial experience using TAMIS for benign and malignant rectal neoplasia.

METHODS

This is an institutional review board approved, retrospective case series report.

RESULTS

TAMIS was performed in 32 patients for rectal adenoma (13), adenocarcinoma (16), and carcinoid (3). There were 14 women, with mean age 62 ± 15 years and body mass index 28 ± 5 kg/m(2). Lesion size ranged from .5 to 8.5 cm, distance from the dentate line 1 to 11 cm, and circumference of the lesion 10% to 100%. The mean operative time was 123 ± 62 minutes. Mean hospital length of stay was 2.5 ± 2 days. Complications included urinary tract infection (1), Clostridium difficile diarrhea (1), atrial fibrillation (1), rectal stenosis (1), and rectal bleeding (1).

CONCLUSION

TAMIS using a disposable transanal access platform is a safe and effective method to remove rectal lesions in this case series.

Outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery with intraperitoneal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery has gained increasing popularity as a treatment alternative for early stage rectal neoplasms. With continued advances in technique and experience, more proximal rectal tumors are being surgically managed by using transanal endoscopic microsurgery with an intraperitoneal anastomosis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who have undergone intraperitoneal anastomosis with the use of the transanal endoscopic microsurgery technique.

DESIGN

A prospective, single-surgeon database documented 445 consecutive patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery from October 1, 1996 through January 1, 2012. We retrospectively reviewed information from all patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery with an intraperitoneal anastomosis in this prospective database.

SETTINGS

All procedures took place in an inpatient hospital setting.

PATIENTS

All patients satisfied workup criteria to undergo surgery for rectal neoplasm.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Size and pathology of lesion, length of procedure, hospital stay, estimated blood loss, margin status, and complications were the outcomes measured.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery had definitively documented intraperitoneal entry and anastomosis. Median follow-up was 12 months (range, 0.5-111 months). There were no operative mortalities. Procedure-related complications included urinary retention (11%), fever (11%), and fecal seepage (4%). Four patients (14%) had positive margins on final pathology. One patient (3%) required abdominal exploration for an anastomotic leak but did not require diversion.

LIMITATIONS

Although this study analyzes prospectively collected data, it is nonetheless a retrospective analysis that can introduce bias. Because this is a single-center study with a relatively homogenous population, the results may not be generalizable. Our sample size may also be underpowered to detect clinically significant outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with intraperitoneal anastomosis can be safely performed without fecal diversion by experienced surgeons.

Transanal colorectal resection using natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)

The surgical management of rectal cancer has evolved over the past century, with total mesorectal excision (TME) emerging as standard of care. As a result of the morbidity associated with open TME, minimally invasive techniques have become popular. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has been held as the next revolution in surgical techniques, offering the possibility of 'incisionless' TME. Early clinical series of transanal TME with laparoscopic assistance (n = 72) are promising, with overall intraoperative and postoperative complication rates of 8.3% and 27.8%, respectively, similar to laparoscopic TME. The mesorectal specimen was intact in all patients, and 94.4% had negative margins. There was no oncological recurrence in average-risk patients at short-term follow up, and 2-year survival rates in high-risk patients were comparable to that after laparoscopic TME. These preliminary studies demonstrate transanal NOTES TME with laparoscopic assistance to be clinically feasible and safe given careful patient selection, surgical expertise, and appropriate procedural training. We are hopeful that with optimization of transanal instruments and surgical techniques, pure transanal NOTES TME will become a viable alternative to open and laparoscopic TME in the future.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery

There is increasing interest in organ-preserving options in the management of rectal cancer. Excision of small, early stage cancers by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is an important part of this approach. Carefully selected cancers can be treated successfully by TEM with acceptably low risk of recurrent disease and overall cancer outcomes similar to radical surgery. The impact of recurrence can be mitigated by early detection of luminal or nodal disease for which a robust surveillance programme is essential. However, patients with high risk features on post-TEM pathology should be offered completion radical surgery which is associated with good oncological results. There may be an opportunity to expand the population of patients who can be offered rectal preservation with the use of radiotherapy in either adjuvant or neo-adjuvant context. Full thickness excision by TEM may be particularly valuable in those demonstrating a clinical complete response to radiotherapy, where diagnosis of complete pathological response can be confirmed. The use of TEM in managing more advanced rectal cancers is exciting, but must be tested within formal clinical trials before being adopted as routine practice.

[Transanal endoscopic operations for rectal tumours]

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) may be the technique of choice for the treatment of rectal lesions, both benign and selected malignant lesions, with similar survival rates to conventional surgery but with lower morbidity.

METHODS

In this article we present a series of 70 patients operated on with this procedure (TEO) in our center. The indications were benign rectal lesions and malignant lesions at early stages (T1) 86%. The surgical procedure was performed with the the transanal endoscopic operation platform (TEO; Karl Storz, Tüttlingen, Germany) and ultrasonic scalpel (Harmonic scalpel, Ethicon Endo-surgery,…).

RESULTS

The indication in 43 patients was a benign lesion (adenoma), in the other 27 the diagnosis was adenocarcinoma. After the resection, 61% of the series had a malignant lesion in the pathology report: 13 patients of the 43 with a benign lesion initially had a malignant lesion in the pathology report. Postoperative morbidity was 36%, Clavien III (5,7%). 3 patients (4%) needed emergency surgery. All of the benign lesions were completely excised, but 7 malignant lesions had resection margin involvement The median follow-up time was 26,4 months (range, 1-71 months), the overall recurrence for benign tumors was 9%, 8% for malignant pT1 and 12,5% for malignant pT2. Early salvage surgery was performed on 8 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

TEO allows us to excise benign rectal lesions that could not be excised with a conventional approach (endoscopic or transanal resection) with a low morbidity rate. TEO can be used for malignant rectal tumors in early stages (pT1) with pathological confirmation.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: what indications in 2013?

Thanks to major advances in the field of surgical techniques and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, along with more accurate pre-operative staging tools and the widespread introduction of population-based screening programs, treatment of rectal cancer has been evolving over the past few decades, moving towards a more tailored approach. This has brought a shift in the treatment algorithm of benign rectal lesions and selected early rectal cancers, for which today transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is accepted as an effective alternative to abdominal surgery.

In 2013, topics of controversy are the role of TEM in the treatment of more advanced rectal cancers, in cases of complete pathological response after chemoradiation therapy and the role of TEM as a platform for single-port surgery and NOTES. This article reviews the current indications for TEM and the future perspectives of this approach in the treatment of rectal tumors.

eTAMIS: endoscopic visualization for transanal minimally invasive surgery

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgical (TEM) resection is associated with improved outcomes compared to transanal excision of rectal lesions. However, TEM equipment requires additional operative setup time, and tumor location dictates patient positioning. In 2010, Drs. Attallah, Albert, and Larach developed an alternative technique, transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). Herein, we describe our novel experience using endoscopic visualization to perform TAMIS (eTAMIS) to remove a large rectal polyp.

METHODS

This is a technical note describing a new surgical technique, eTAMIS. The technique is performed with the Gelpoint Path TAMIS platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) and a standard single-channel endoscope for visualization. Patient demographics, operative data, and pathologic data were recorded.

RESULTS

eTAMIS was initially performed in a 50-year-old woman with an endoscopically defiant rectal mass discovered on routine screening colonoscopy. The lesion was a tubulovillous adenoma, 10 cm from the anal verge, anterior, and occupied 15-20 % of the circumference. The rectal mass was removed by eTAMIS. The operative time was 101 minutes, and the patient was discharged within 24 h without event. Final pathology revealed a focus of well-differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma with focal invasion into the muscularis mucosa (Haggit level 0, pTis) arising in the head of a pedunculated tubulovillous adenoma. At 1-year follow-up endoscopy, the patient had no evidence of recurrent mass or polyp.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first technical report describing endoscopic visualization for TAMIS. Endoscopic visualization facilitates intraluminal articulation and lens cleaning while minimizing extraluminal instrument collisions. eTAMIS is a practical and logical evolution of the visual approach to natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and laparoendoscopic surgery.

Does peritoneal perforation affect short- and long-term outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery?

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal perforation (PP) is frequently reported as a complication of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Nevertheless, these concerns have only rarely been addressed in the literature, with no mention of the long-term oncologic consequences of PP.

METHODS

A prospective database was analyzed with the intent to evaluate the influence of PP on the short- and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing TEM.

RESULTS

Peritoneal perforation occurred in 28 (5.8%) of 481 patients who underwent TEM for a rectal neoplasm. The conversion rate to abdominal surgery was 10.7% (3/28). All the conversions occurred during the first 100 TEM procedures (3/100 vs 0/381; p = 0.007). The postoperative morbidity rate was 3.6% (1/28), and the 30-day mortality was nil. Compared with the group of patients who had no peritoneal perforation, the PP group showed a significantly longer operating time (120 vs 60 min; p < 0.001) and a significantly longer hospital stay (6 vs 4 days; p = 0.003). Nevertheless, the global morbidity rate and the type of complications according to Dindo's classification were similar. In the multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of PP was tumor distance from the anal verge (p = 0.010). During a median follow-up period of 48 months (range, 12-150 months), no liver or peritoneal metastases were detected in 13 patients with rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal perforation does not seem to affect short-term or oncologic outcomes for patients submitted to TEM with full-thickness resection for upper rectum neoplasms. The use of TEM to resect rectal lesions involving the intraperitoneal rectum may therefore represent an intermediate step toward the development of transrectal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery-based transanal access for colorectal surgery: experience on human cadavers

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was described in 1983 for local excision of rectal tumors. In the context of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery, we have modified the original TEM system and developed a new set of instruments. These are more curved and, in addition, steerable. After extensive studies in an ex-vivo model, we developed a novel technique for transanal rectosigmoid resection and colorectal anastomosis. The technique comprises closure of the rectal lumen by purse-string suture, transection of the rectal wall distal to the closure, circumferential mobilization of rectum and mesorectal tissue in the anatomical plane from below upward, control of the inferior mesenteric vessel, removal of mobilized colorectum through the anus, and, finally, the colorectal anastomosis by either stapled or hand-sutured technique. This procedure was performed on three alcohol-glycerol preserved well-built human cadavers (M:F=2:1). The average operating time was 190 minutes. The average length of the resected specimen was 23 cm. There was no fecal contamination or injury to the resected specimen. Postprocedure laparotomy revealed adequate mesorectal resection and no inadvertent injury to other viscera. During dissection in the pelvis, as the resected rectum was pushed upward, an unobstructed "empty pelvis" situation was developed in the operating site, thus facilitating the mesorectal resection. Transanal access for colorectal surgery seems feasible. It provides a precise definition of the distal safety margin, good view of the pelvis for meticulous mesorectal resection, and reduces the abdominal wall trauma. These may enhance the outcome of colorectal resection. However, further clinical studies can only substantiate these findings.

Development of a feasible transrectal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES®) approach in a cadaveric appendectomy model: anterior is better

BACKGROUND

The transrectal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach is a potentially promising alternative to transgastric or transvaginal approaches for intraperitoneal procedures. However, whether the optimal transrectal approach for intraperitoneal surgery is anterior or posterior remains unknown. To evaluate this, a prospective comparison of anterior and posterior transrectal NOTES approaches in a cadaveric appendectomy model was performed.

METHODS

Operations were performed on human cadavers using a transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) scope to assist with access and closure. Posterior access was achieved by tunneling cephalad through the retrorectal space into the peritoneal cavity. Anterior transrectal access was established through the rectal wall just above the peritoneal reflection. A dual-channel flexible endoscope was used to perform appendectomies. Rectotomies were closed using sutures or staples. Operative time, degree of laparoscopic assistance, complications, and leak-testing results were recorded.

RESULTS

This study investigated 10 cadavers with access and closure attempted using both anterior (n = 10) and posterior (n = 5) approaches, whereas appendectomies were performed using either an anterior (n = 8) or a posterior (n = 2) approach. The anterior approach required less time than the posterior approach for peritoneal access (4 ± 1 vs. 61 ± 14 min; p < 0.001), specimen extraction (2 ± 1 vs. 5 ± 1 min; p < 0.01), and the total operation (99 ± 35 vs. 176 ± 26 min; p = 0.02). A "pure" NOTES dissection was possible with the anterior approach using rigid transanal instruments for assistance. Dissection time, closure time, and the incidence of complications were similar between the two approaches. Leak testing of closures showed significant variability for all closure types.

CONCLUSION

Transrectal NOTES appendectomy is feasible in a cadaveric model using an anterior transrectal approach. This approach is technically easier, results in shorter operative times, and allows for a "pure" NOTES dissection compared with a posterior transrectal approach. Leak pressure testing of NOTES closures is unreliable in the cadaveric model.

A novel single-port technique for transanal rectosigmoid resection and colorectal anastomosis on an ex vivo experimental model

BACKGROUND

In the context of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), we developed a new set of rigid instruments according to the principles of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).These instruments are long, curved, and steerable by rotating two wheels near its handle. Our success in transvaginal cholecystectomy in human with these instruments motivated us to explore the feasibility of rectosigmoid resection through the anus.

METHODS

The young bovine large bowel with attached organs is collected en bloc and reintegrated into an anatomically designed trainer to reproduce the human anatomy. The technique comprises the following: (1) closure of the rectal lumen by an endolumenal pursestring suture; (2) transection of the rectal wall 1 cm distal to the pursestring suture and continuation of the dissection toward the fascia and upward excising the mesorectal tissue; (3) inferior mesenteric artery is divided near its origin; (4) the colon is mobilized up to the splenic flexure; (5) the mobilized colon is brought down to the pelvis, ligated twice at the intended proximal resection site, and divided between the ligatures; (6) specimen is delivered transanally; and (7) intestinal continuity is restored by stapled or hand-sutured anastomosis.

RESULTS

Twelve rectosigmoid resections, 20 stapled, and 27 hand-sutured anastomoses were performed in two experimental setups. Mean operation time for the resection part was 78.6 min (standard deviation (SD)=9.9). The average specimen length was 37.2 cm. During dissection in the pelvis, as the specimen was pushed upward and toward abdomen, an "empty pelvis" view of the working field was achieved, facilitating dissection. The mean operation time for hand-sutured and stapled anastomoses were 47.7 (SD=6.9) and 43.3 (SD=7.1) min, respectively. Both groups had one anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal rectosigmoid resection is feasible with TEM technology. The unobstructed "empty pelvis" view is likely to enhance the quality of mesorectal dissection.

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: The state of the art

At present time, there is evidence from randomized controlled studies of the success of laparoscopic resection for the treatment of colon cancer with reported smaller incisions, lower morbidity rate and earlier recovery compared to open surgery. Technical limitations and a steep learning curve have limited the wide application of mini-invasive surgery for rectal cancer. The present article discusses the current status of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. A review of the more recent retrospective, prospective and randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer including the role of trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery and robotics was performed. A particular emphasis was dedicated to mid and low rectal cancers. Few prospective and RCT trials specifically addressing laparoscopic rectal cancer resection are currently available in the literature. Improved short-term outcomes in term of lesser intraoperative blood loss, reduced analgesic requirements and a shorter hospital stay have been demonstrated. Concerns have recently been raised in the largest RCT trial of the oncological adequacy of laparoscopy in terms of increased rate of circumferential margin. This data however was not confirmed by other prospective comparative studies. Moreover, a similar local recurrence rate has been reported in RCT and comparative series. Similar findings of overall and disease free survival have been reported but the follow-up time period is too short in all these studies and the few RCT trials currently available do not draw any definitive conclusions. On the basis of available data in the literature, the mini-invasive approach to rectal cancer surgery has some short-term advantages and does not seem to confer any disadvantage in term of local recurrence. With respect to long-term survival, a definitive answer cannot be given at present time as the results of RCT trials focused on long-term survival currently ongoing are still to fully clarify this issue.