Endoscopic endoluminal radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: initial results and lessons learned

Durability of radiofrequency ablation for long-segment and ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus over 10 years

BACKGROUND

Long-term durability data for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma in long-segment (LSBE) and ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus (ULSBE) is lacking. This study aimed to determine 10-year cancer progression, eradication, and complication rates in LSBE and ULSBE patients treated with RFA.

METHODS

Single-surgeon prospective database of patients with LSBE (≥ 3 to < 8 cm) and ULSBE (≥ 8 cm) who underwent RFA (2001-2021) were retrospectively analyzed. Ten-year cancer progression calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Eradication rates, including complete remission of dysplasia (CR-D) and intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM), and rates of recurrence and complications, compared between LSBE and ULSBE groups.

RESULTS

Ten years after starting treatment, the cancer rate was 14.3% in 56 patients. CR-D and CR-IM rates were 87.5% and 67.9%, respectively. Relapse rates from CR-D were 1.8% and 3.6% from CR-IM. Eradication rates for dysplasia in LSBE and ULSBE patients (90.6% versus 83.3%) and IM (71.9% versus 62.5%) were not significantly different. ULSBE patients required higher mean number of ablation sessions for IM eradication (4.7 versus 3.7, p = 0.032), while complication rates including strictures (4.2% versus 6.2%), perforation (0 versus 0), and bleeding (4.2% versus 3.1%), were similar between ULSBE and LSBE patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, shorter Barrett's segment and baseline low-grade dysplasia were associated with increased likelihood for eradication of IM and dysplasia. A total number of ablation sessions or endoscopic resections ≥ 3 was associated with reduced likelihood for eradication.

CONCLUSION

RFA was durable in maintaining dysplasia and IM eradication in both LSBE and ULSBE over 10 years, and with low complication rates. IM eradication was more difficult to achieve in ULSBE. Late development of cancer occurred in 14.3%.

Barrett esophagus

Although there are many unanswered questions with Barrett esophagus, we can safely say that the incidence is increasing, chemoprevention strategies for the prevention of Barrett metaplasia and its progression to adenocarcinoma may be in the offing, surveillance should be considered for all patients who are discovered to have Barrett esophagus, RFA is the treatment of choice for those with HGD and strongly considered in those with LGD, EMR should be the treatment of choice for patients with nodular high-grade Barrett esophagus, and, finally, vagal-sparing esophagectomy reserved for patients with persistent HGD or a strong suspicion of carcinoma, with consideration of a concomitant fundoplication.

Systematic review comparing radiofrequency ablation and complete endoscopic resection in treating dysplastic Barrett's esophagus: a critical assessment of histologic outcomes and adverse events

BACKGROUND

With recent advances in endoscopy, endoscopic techniques have surpassed esophagectomy in the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of complete EMR and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of dysplastic BE.

DESIGN

Systematic review of literature.

PATIENTS

Diagnosis of BE with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer.

INTERVENTION

Complete EMR or RFA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia at the end of treatment and after >12 months' follow-up. Adverse event rates associated with treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only 1 trial directly compared the 2 techniques; most studies were observational case series. Dysplasia was effectively eradicated at the end of treatment in 95% of patients after complete EMR and 92% after RFA. After a median follow-up of 23 months for complete EMR and 21 months for RFA, eradication of dysplasia was maintained in 95% of patients treated with complete EMR and 94% treated with RFA. Short-term adverse events were seen in 12% of patients treated with complete EMR but in only 2.5% of those treated with RFA. Esophageal strictures were adverse events in 38% of patients treated with complete EMR, compared with 4% of those treated with RFA. Progression to cancer appeared to be rare after treatment, although follow-up was short.

LIMITATIONS

Small studies, heterogeneous in design, with variable outcome measures. Also follow-up durations were short, limiting evaluation of long-term durability of both treatments.

CONCLUSION

RFA and complete EMR are equally effective in the short-term treatment of dysplastic BE, but adverse event rates are higher with complete EMR.

Efficacy and durability of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's Esophagus: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) safely and effectively eradicates dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia. We aimed to determine the efficacy and durability of RFA for patients with dysplastic and nondysplastic BE.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies identified in PubMed and EMBASE that reported the proportion of patients treated with RFA who had complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM), and the proportion of patients with recurrent IM after successful treatment. Pooled estimates of CE-D, CE-IM, IM recurrence, and adverse events were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies of 3802 patients reporting efficacy and 6 studies of 540 patients reporting durability. Ten were prospective cohort studies, 9 were retrospective cohort studies, and 1 was a randomized trial. CE-IM was achieved in 78% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-86%) and CE-D was achieved in 91% (95% CI, 87%-95%). After eradication, IM recurred in 13% (95% CI, 9%-18%). Progression to cancer occurred in 0.2% of patients during treatment and in 0.7% of those after CE-IM. Esophageal stricture was the most common adverse event and was reported in 5% of patients (95% CI, 3%-7%). Confidence in most summary estimates was limited by a high degree of heterogeneity, which did not appear to be caused by single outlier studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of BE with RFA results in CE-D and CE-IM in a high proportion of patients, with few recurrences of IM after treatment and a low rate of adverse events. Despite the large amount of study heterogeneity, these data provide additional information for patients and providers to make informed treatment decisions.

Radiofrequency ablation for long- and ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus: a comparative long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

The safety, efficacy, and durability of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), with or without EMR, have been established for long-segment Barrett's esophagus (LSBE). Ablating ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus (ULSBE) may be associated with increased stricture formation, eradication failure, and treatment session requirements.

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to compare eradication and stricture rates between LSBE (≥3 to <8 cm) and ULSBE (≥8 cm). Our secondary objective was to evaluate treatment durability and session requirements.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Tertiary care facility.

PATIENTS

A total of 72 patients (34 ULSBE, 38 LSBE; mean Barrett's segment length of 10.8 and 4.7 cm) underwent RFA between August 2005 and September 2010. Mean follow-up was 45 and 34 months, respectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Eradication and complication rates for ULSBE and LSBE.

RESULTS

Eradication rates for dysplasia (90% vs 88%, P = 1.0) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) (77% vs 82%, P = .77) were similar. ULSBE patients required more overall (P < .01) and circumferential (P < .01) RFA; however, stricture rates were identical (14%). There was no dysplasia recurrence, and IM recurrence was similar (ULSBE, 23%; LSBE, 16%; P = .52). At 3 years, IM remained eradicated in 65% of ULSBE and 82% of LSBE, without maintenance RFA. On multivariate regression analysis, increasing Barrett's length was associated with a reduced likelihood for eradicating IM (odds ratio 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.00), but not dysplasia (odds ratio 1.13; 95% CI, 0.95-1.35).

LIMITATIONS

Single center.

CONCLUSION

ULSBE can be treated in its entirety at each session with efficacy and safety comparable to LSBE. ULSBE requires more effort to achieve IM eradication, and RFA is less durable in maintaining this eradication at 3-year follow-up.

Patterns of recurrent and persistent intestinal metaplasia after successful radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVE

Radiofrequency ablation can eradicate Barrett's esophagus successfully in the majority of cases. We sought to determine (1) how often intestinal metaplasia is detected during follow-up endoscopy after successful ablation and (2) patterns of persistent/recurrent intestinal metaplasia.

METHODS

Patients ablated successfully during a phase II clinical trial of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus were followed using endoscopic surveillance according to a defined protocol. Systematic biopsies were performed in all patients throughout the neosquamous epithelium as well as at the gastroesophageal junction, and patterns of recurrent or persistent intestinal metaplasia were documented.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were ablated successfully during this single-institution clinical trial. A total of 151 follow-up endoscopies were performed (range, 1-5 endoscopies per patient) and 2492 biopsies were obtained, of which 604 (24%) were from the gastroesophageal junction. The median follow-up period was 18 months (range, 3-50 months). Recurrent/persistent intestinal metaplasia was detected in 14 patients (26%) in 3 distinct patterns: endoscopically invisible intestinal metaplasia underneath the neosquamous epithelium (buried glands) in 3 patients, visible recurrence in the tubular esophagus in 3 patients, and intestinal metaplasia of the gastroesophageal junction (with a squamous-lined tubular esophagus) in 10 patients. Dysplasia or cancer was not detected in any patient during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent/persistent intestinal metaplasia after successful radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus is relatively common. This finding has implications for the continued surveillance of patients who are ablated successfully.

Article Commentary: Management of Barrett's Esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is a pathologic change of the normal squamous epithelium of the esophagus to specialized columnar metaplasia. Barrett's esophagus is a result of prolonged exposure of the esophagus to gastroduodenal refluxate. Although Barrett's itself is not symptomatic, and, in fact, patients with Barrett's esophagus may be completely asymptomatic, it does identify patients at higher risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. Traditionally, antireflux surgery was reserved for patients with symptoms, because it was believed that antireflux surgery did not eliminate Barrett's esophagus and reduce cancer risk. Rationale for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus beyond treating symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease stems from the hope to decrease, if not eliminate, the risk of adenocarcinoma. Treatment options ranged from medical acid suppression without surveillance to resection. Ablation, particularly endoscopic radio-frequency ablation, has become the standard of care for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. It role in nondysplastic or low-grade dysplastic Barrett's is less clear. Combined endoscopic mucosal resection with ablation is effective in nodular high-grade Barrett's esophagus. Resection should be reserved for patients with persistent high-grade dysplasia despite multiple attempts at endoscopic ablation or resection or for patients with evidence of carcinoma.

Endoscopic and medical therapy for chronic radiation proctopathy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chronic radiation proctopathy is associated with significant morbidity. The effectiveness of endoscopic and medical therapies has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of endoscopic and comparative medical therapies for chronic radiation proctopathy.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search Medline and PubMed was performed.

STUDY SELECTION

A comprehensive literature search was performed for studies of endoscopic and medical therapy for clinical and endoscopic improvement in chronic radiation proctopathy from January 1990 until December 2010. The quality of the overall evidence was rated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group.

SETTING

Patients in both inpatient and outpatient settings were assessed.

PATIENTS

Patients experiencing chronic radiation proctopathy were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients had undergone medical or endoscopic treatments for chronic radiation proctopathy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcomes measured were the resolution or improvement in symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies were found, of which 27 evaluated endoscopic therapy and 12 evaluated medical therapy chronic radiation proctopathy. Overall, there is low-level evidence for the effectiveness of endoscopic therapy with argon plasma coagulation in reducing short-term (≤6 weeks) symptoms of chronic radiation proctopathy and insufficient evidence for long-term improvement. There is moderate-level evidence for the use of sucralfate enemas and low-level evidence for use of short-chain fatty acid enemas and hyperbaric oxygen. There is insufficient evidence for other agents: topical formalin, 5-aminosalicylic acid compounds, sulfasalazine, vitamin A, and pentoxifylline.

LIMITATIONS

Individual authors were not contacted, and the search was limited to English language journals only.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment with argon plasma coagulation appears effective in the short-term outcome of chronic radiation proctopathy. There is a moderate level of evidence for the use of sucralfate enemas. Large, randomized, placebo-controlled studies evaluating endoscopic and medical therapies for chronic radiation proctopathy are needed.

Increased risk for persistent intestinal metaplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus and uncontrolled reflux exposure before radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe alternative to esophagectomy for patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). Although some studies have indicated that RFA is effective at eradicating dysplasia, most have found that RFA is not as effective in eradicating intestinal metaplasia. We investigated whether uncontrolled reflux is associated with persistent intestinal metaplasia after RFA.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with BE underwent RFA, high-resolution manometry, and 24-hour impedance-pH testing; they received proton pump inhibitors twice daily. Patients returned every 2 months for repeat treatment or standard surveillance. Patients were classified as complete responders (CRs) if all intestinal metaplasia was eradicated in fewer than 3 ablation sessions. We analyzed clinical parameters to identify factors associated with a CR or incomplete responder (ICR).

RESULTS

Among the 37 patients, 22 had a CR and 15 had an ICR. Mann-Whitney U tests revealed that length of BE, size of hiatal hernia, and frequency of reflux, but not acid reflux, differed between CRs and ICRs. CRs had fewer weakly acidic events than ICRs (29.5 vs 52; P < .05) and total reflux events (33.5 vs 60; P < .05), and a trend toward fewer weakly alkaline events (1.0 vs 5.0; P = .06). No other clinical or manometric features differed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncontrolled, predominantly weakly acidic reflux despite twice-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy before RFA increases the incidence of persistent intestinal metaplasia after ablation in patients with BE. Length of BE and size of hiatal hernia also were associated with persistent intestinal metaplasia after RFA.

The cost effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) reduces the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD), but its effects in patients without dysplasia are debatable. We analyzed the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of RFA for the management of BE.

METHODS

We constructed a decision analytic Markov model. We conducted separate analyses of hypothetical cohorts of patients with BE with dysplasia (HGD or low-grade [LGD]) and without dysplasia. In the analysis of the group with HGD, we compared results of initial RFA with endoscopic surveillance with surgery when cancer was detected. In analyzing the group with LGD or no dysplasia, we compared 3 strategies: endoscopic surveillance with surgery when cancer was detected (S1), endoscopic surveillance with RFA when HGD was detected (S2), and initial RFA followed by endoscopic surveillance (S3).

RESULTS

Among patients with HGD, initial RFA was more effective and less costly than endoscopic surveillance. Among patients with LGD, when S3 was compared with S2, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $18,231/quality-adjusted life-year, assuming an annual rate of progression rate from LGD to EAC of 0.5%/year. For patients without dysplasia, S2 was more effective and less costly than S1. In a comparison of S3 with S2, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $205,500, $124,796, and $118,338/quality-adjusted life-year using annual rates of progression of no dysplasia to EAC of 0.12%, 0.33%, or 0.5% per year, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

By using updated data, initial RFA might not be cost effective for patients with BE without dysplasia, within the range of plausible rates of progression of BE to EAC, and be prohibitively expensive, from a policy perspective. RFA might be cost effective for confirmed and stable LGD. Initial RFA is more effective and less costly than endoscopic surveillance in HGD.

High-grade dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: the role of esophagectomy in the era of endoscopic eradication therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to evaluate the role of esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC) in light of recent advances in endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus.

RECENT FINDINGS

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are proven well tolerated and effective, at least in midterm follow-up. The application of these techniques has opened a new road for the local treatment of esophageal HGD and IMC. To safely employ these techniques, reliable and accurate staging of the esophageal neoplasm is essential. EMR has taken a central role, as it allows the pathologist to provide tumor-staging information necessary for an appropriate clinical management decision process. Unfortunately, both RFA and EMR have limitations that preclude their universal use in the treatment of early esophageal cancer. In some cases, esophagectomy still remains the best treatment option. The evolution of the minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy may improve outcomes of this major operation.

SUMMARY

A better understanding of the indications and limitations of endoscopic therapy for HGD and IMC permits a tailored approach to the management of patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma. When indicated, the selection of a less morbid surgical technique has the potential to improve overall surgical and oncological outcomes.

Outcomes from a prospective trial of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of early squamous cell neoplasia of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is safe and effective for eradicating neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate RFA for eradicating early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia (ESCN) defined as moderate-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (MGIN) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and early flat-type esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Esophageal unstained lesions (USLs) were identified using Lugol's chromoendoscopy. Inclusion criteria were at least 1 flat (type 0-IIb) USL 3 cm or larger, USL-bearing esophagus 12 cm or less, and a consensus diagnosis of MGIN, HGIN, or ESCC by 2 expert GI pathologists. Exclusion criteria were previous endoscopic resection or ablation, stricture, or any nonflat mucosa.

INTERVENTIONS

Circumferential RFA creating a continuous treatment area (TA) including all USLs. At 3-month intervals thereafter, chromoendoscopy with biopsies followed by focal RFA of USLs, if present.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Complete response (CR) at 12 months defined as absence of MGIN, HGIN, or ESCC in the TA, CR after 1 RFA session, neoplastic progression from baseline, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (14 male, mean age 60.3 years) with MGIN (n = 18), HGIN (n = 10), or ESCC (n = 1) participated. Mean USL length was 6.2 cm (TA 8.2 cm). At 3 months after 1 RFA session, 86% of patients (25/29) had a CR. At 12 months, 97% of patients (28/29) had a CR. There was no neoplastic progression. There were 4 strictures, all dilated to resolution.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study with limited number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early ESCN (MGIN, HGIN, flat-type ESCC), RFA was associated with a high rate of histological complete response (97% of patients), no neoplastic progression, and an acceptable adverse event profile.

Ablative therapies for Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus has gained increased clinical attention because of its association with esophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with increasing incidence and poor survival rates. The goals of ablating Barrett's esophagus are to decrease esophageal cancer rates and to improve overall survival and quality of life. Different techniques have been developed and tested for their effectiveness eradicating Barrett's epithelium. This review assesses the literature associated with different ablative techniques. The safety and efficacy of different techniques are discussed. This review concludes with recommendations for the clinician, including specific strategies for patient care decisions for patients with Barrett's esophagus with varying degrees of dysplasia.

Endoscopic management of early esophageal neoplasia: an emerging standard

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and ablation technologies have markedly changed the treatment of early esophageal neoplasia. We analyzed treatment and outcomes of patients undergoing multimodal endoscopic treatment of early esophageal neoplasia at our institution.

METHODS

Records of patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for esophageal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN, n = 11), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN, n  = 24), or T1N0M0 neoplasia (n = 10), presenting between 2007 and 2009, were reviewed. Outcomes included eradication of neoplasia/intestinal metaplasia, development of metachronous neoplasia, and progression to surgical resection.

RESULTS

There were 45 patients, 96% male, with a mean age 67 years. The degree of neoplasia prior to intervention was intramucosal (8) or submucosal (2) carcinoma in 10, HGIN in 24, and LGIN in 11. Patients underwent a total of 166 procedures (median 3/patient, range 1-9). These included 120 radiofrequency ablation sessions, 38 EMRs, and 8 cryoablations. Mean follow-up was 21.3 months. Neoplasia and intestinal metaplasia were eradicated in 87.2% and 56.4% of patients, respectively, while 15.4% developed metachronous neoplasia. Three patients underwent esophagectomy. No patient developed unresectable disease or died.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment of early esophageal neoplasia is safe and effective in the short term. A minority of treated patients developed recurrent neoplasia, which is usually amenable to further endoscopic therapy. Complications are relatively minor and uncommon. Endoscopic therapy as the initial treatment for early esophageal neoplasia is an emerging standard of care.

Barrett's esophagus: endoscopic treatments I

The following on endoscopic treatments of Barrett's esophagus includes commentaries on indications for endoscopic treatments; endo-luminal plication procedures; the cellular modifications induced by the endoscopic ablation therapies; eradication by banding without resection; the evaluation of complete ablation; recurrence after ablation; association of antireflux surgery; radiofrequency ablation; and nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Endoscopic resection techniques and ablative therapies for Barrett’s neoplasia

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is the most rapidly increasing cancer in western countries. High-grade dysplasia (HGD) arising from Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the most important risk factor for its development, and when it is present the reported incidence is up to 10% per patient-year. Adenocarcinoma in the setting of BE develops through a well known histological sequence, from non-dysplastic Barrett’s to low grade dysplasia and then HGD and cancer. Endoscopic surveillance programs have been established to detect the presence of neoplasia at a potentially curative stage. Newly developed endoscopic treatments have dramatically changed the therapeutic approach of BE. When neoplasia is confined to the mucosal layer the risk for developing lymph node metastasis is negligible and can be successfully eradicated by an endoscopic approach, offering a curative intention treatment with minimal invasiveness. Endoscopic therapies include resection techniques, also known as tissue-acquiring modalities, and ablation therapies or non-tissue acquiring modalities. The aim of endoscopic treatment is to eradicate the whole Barrett’s segment, since the risk of developing synchronous and metachronous lesions due to the persistence of molecular aberrations in the residual epithelium is well established.

Barrett's esophagus: endoscopic treatments II

The following on endoscopic treatments of Barrett's esophagus includes commentaries on animal experiments on cryotherapy; indications for cryotherapy, choice of dosimetry, number of sessions, and role in Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma; recent technical developments of RFA technology and long-term effects; the comparative effects of diverse ablation procedures and the rate of recurrence following treatment; and the indications for treatment of dysplasia and the role of radiofrequency ablation.

Effect of hiatal hernia size and columnar segment length on the success of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus: a single-center, phase II clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Hiatal hernia is common in patients with Barrett's esophagus. We sought to evaluate the effect of hiatal hernia size and initial columnar segment length on the success of radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

A phase II clinical trial was conducted aimed at evaluating the success of radiofrequency ablation in eradicating Barrett's esophagus. Success was defined as complete replacement of the columnar lining with squamous mucosa and lack of intestinal metaplasia using light microscopy. Hiatal hernia size and columnar segment length were measured endoscopically.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were accrued to the protocol. In the 55 patients who completed radiofrequency ablation (43 successes, 12 failures), the mean hiatal hernia size was 3.3 cm (range, 0-10 cm), and the mean columnar segment length was 5.4 cm (range, 1-18 cm). The median length of the columnar segment was 3 cm in the successful cases and 8.5 cm in the failed cases (P = .002). Although the median hiatal hernia size was identical in the successful and failed cases (3 cm, P = .38), the median hiatal hernia size was 7 cm (P = .001) in the 6 patients who experienced nonhealing after the initial ablation. Patients who were successfully ablated but had larger hiatal hernias and longer columnar segment lengths required significantly more radiofrequency ablation sessions than those with smaller hernias and shorter segments (P = .003 and P = .007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with larger hiatal hernias and longer columnar segments are more likely to experience failure or nonhealing after radiofrequency ablation. These patients also require more radiofrequency ablation treatments to achieve successful eradication of Barrett's esophagus.

The role of radiofrequency ablation in the management of Barrett's esophagus

Studies in the last several years have consistently shown radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of nondysplastic and dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). The results found at academic medical centers have been reproduced in the community setting. RFA provides a safe and cost-effective alternative to surgery or surveillance in the management of high-grade dysplasia (HGD). RFA should be given serious consideration as first-line therapy for HGD. This article reviews the evidence behind RFA to differentiate it from other management strategies in terms of efficacy, durability, safety, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness. The role of RFA in the management of BE is described, including endoscopic resection. Future directions are identified for research that will help to better define the role of RFA in the management of BE.

Feasibility of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic radiation proctitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic radiation proctitis can be difficult to manage. Radiofrequency ablation has recently been shown to be effective in the management of gastric antral vascular ectasia and Barrett's esophagus, but its utility in the treatment of chronic radiation proctitis is undetermined.

METHOD

A 77-year-old man with extensive chronic radiation proctitis had continued bleeding despite argon plasma coagulation. The HALO(90) radiofrequency system (BARRX Medical, Sunnyvale, CA) was used for treatment regions of proctitis at an energy density of 12 J/cm(2).

RESULTS

At monthly intervals, over 3 months, radiofrequency ablation was performed with a mean of 7 regions ablated at a time. The mean treatment time was 29 minutes. There was no significant bleeding after the first treatment session. The patient was symptom free at 6 months follow-up with minimal evidence of residual mucosal abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency ablation appears feasible for treatment of refractory chronic radiation proctitis, with further studies required.

Endoscopic treatments for Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review of safety and effectiveness compared to esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Recently, several new endoscopic treatments have been used to treat patients with Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia. This systematic review aimed to determine the safety and effectiveness of these treatments compared with esophagectomy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify studies of endoscopic treatments for Barrett's esophagus or early stage esophageal cancer. Information from the selected studies was extracted by two independent reviewers. Study quality was assessed and information was tabulated to identify trends or patterns. Results were pooled across studies for each outcome. Safety (occurrence of adverse events) and effectiveness (complete eradication of dysplasia) were compared across different treatments.

RESULTS

The 101 studies that met the selection criteria included 8 endoscopic techniques and esophagectomy; only 12 were comparative studies. The quality of evidence was generally low. Methods and outcomes were inconsistently reported. Protocols, outcomes measured, follow-up times and numbers of treatment sessions varied, making it difficult to calculate pooled estimates.The surgical mortality rate was 1.2%, compared to 0.04% in 2831 patients treated endoscopically (1 death). Adverse events were more severe and frequent with esophagectomy, and included anastomotic leaks (9.4%), wound infections (4.1%) and pulmonary complications (4.1%). Four patients (0.1%) treated endoscopically experienced bleeding requiring transfusions. The stricture rate with esophagectomy (5.3%) was lower than with porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy (18.5%), but higher than aminolevulinic acid (ALA) 60 mg/kg PDT (1.4%). Dysphagia and odynophagia varied in frequency across modalities, with the highest rates reported for multipolar electrocoagulation (MPEC). Photosensitivity, an adverse event that occurs only with photodynamic therapy, was experienced by 26.4% of patients who received porfimer sodium.Some radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or argon plasma coagulation (APC) studies (used in multiple sessions) reported rates of almost 100% for complete eradication of dysplasia. But the study methods and findings were not adequately described. The other studies of endoscopic treatments reported similarly high rates of complete eradication.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatments offer safe and effective alternatives to esophagectomy for patients with Barrett's esophagus and high grade dysplasia. Unfortunately, shortcomings in the published studies make it impossible to determine the comparative effectiveness of each of the endoscopic treatments.

Effects of Nissen fundoplication on endoscopic endoluminal radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endoluminal radiofrequency ablation is achieving increasing acceptance as a mode of eliminating Barrett's metaplasia and, thus, reducing the risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. It is believed that reducing exposure of the esophageal epithelium to acid is essential to achieve long-term ablation of Barrett's esophagus. However, it is unclear whether use of proton pump inhibitors or antireflux operations are more effective to accomplish this goal.

METHODS

All patients who underwent endoscopic endoluminal radiofrequency ablation with the BARRx device (BARRx Medical, Sunnyvale, CA) were reviewed for date of initial ablation, length of Barrett's epithelium, presence or performance of Nissen fundoplication, all follow-up endoscopy and treatment, and posttreatment biopsy results. Patients were categorized by presence of Nissen fundoplication and presence of Barrett's metaplasia or dysplasia by biopsy at least 12 months following ablation and at last endoscopic follow-up. Data were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

Of 77 patients ablated, 47 had documented endoscopic follow-up at 12 months or longer following the ablation. Of these, 19 patients had Nissen fundoplication before, at the same time, or after ablation. Median length of Barrett's epithelium, with interquartile range (IQR), was 3 (2-12) cm in patients with fundoplication compared with 3 (2-7) cm without fundoplication (P = NS). Median follow-up was 15 (12-24) months in fundoplication patients compared with 12.5 (12-17) months without (P = NS). One of 19 patients with fundoplication had persistent or recurrent Barrett's epithelium, compared with 7 of 28 without fundoplication (P = 0.03). Of patients without fundoplication, those who had persistent or recurrent Barrett's had median Barrett's length of 10 cm (6-12 cm) compared with 3 cm (2-5 cm) in patients who had ablated Barrett's (P = 0.03). Follow-up length was similar in those with ablated epithelium, 15 months (12-19 months), compared with those with persistent or recurrent Barrett's, 12 months (12-13 months) (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had fundoplication in conjunction with endoluminal radiofrequency ablation were more likely to achieve durable ablation compared with patients who were treated with proton pump inhibitor therapy. It appears that patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus are at higher risk for persistent or recurrent Barrett's metaplasia. Consideration should be given for an antireflux operation in patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus and planned endoluminal radiofrequency ablation.

Diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus for the endoscopist

In Barrett's esophagus, the stratified squamous epithelium lining the esophagus is replaced by specialized intestinal-type columnar epithelium. The prevalence of Barrett's esophagus has ranged from 0.9% to 4.5%. The rate of progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma is 0.5% per patient-year. Proton-pump inhibitors are the mainstay of symptom control in Barrett's patients. Nondysplastic Barrett's and Barrett's with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) are typically managed by periodic surveillance. Radiofrequency ablation is being evaluated as a modality for managing nondysplastic Barrett's and Barrett's with LGD. The options for the management of Barrett's patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) include endoscopic therapy, surgery, and intensive surveillance until biopsy reveals adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic therapy involves endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and ablation. More aggressive techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and larger segment endoscopic mucosal resection are under study. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus. The recommendations from the major gastroenterologic societies and the current and investigational endoscopic modalities for the management of Barrett's esophagus with and without dysplasia are reviewed.

When to consider endoscopic ablation therapy for Barrett's esophagus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate timing and patient selection for endoscopic ablative therapy in Barrett's esophagus.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been an explosion in the literature describing ablative therapy in Barrett's esophagus. Most recent data describe radiofrequency ablation (RFA), but other data pertain to photodynamic therapy (PDT) and other modalities. Most studies are cohort or case series. Reversion to squamous epithelium is the most common primary outcome. Cancer incidence data are scarce. RFA appears well tolerated. The main side-effect is chest pain, which can be managed with oral analgesics. Stricture occurs in 0-8% and is amenable to endoscopic dilatation. Infrequent side-effects include bleeding and perforation. Complete reversion to squamous epithelium occurs in more than 90% of nondysplastic and low-grade dysplasia and more than 80% in high-grade dysplasia patients, and the treatment appears durable for at least 2-5 years of available follow-up. Treatment of low-grade or nondysplastic disease may be cost-effective. PDT data suggest that all-cause mortality is similar to surgery for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. The stricture rate appears higher, and rates of complete reversion to neosquamous epithelium are lower than that of RFA, although definitive comparisons are lacking.

SUMMARY

The excellent efficacy, side-effect profile, and cost-effectiveness appear to make RFA the intervention of choice in cases of high-grade dysplasia. RFA for low-grade dysplasia may be of value in young patients and/or those with long segment or multifocal disease. Treatment of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus is of uncertain value. PDT appears to have a higher stricture rate and to be more expensive than RFA.

The case for endoscopic treatment of non-dysplastic and low-grade dysplastic Barrett's esophagus

Non-dysplastic mucosa (ND-) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) shows clonal molecular aberrations, loss of cell cycle control, and other features of "neoplasia." These changes occur prior to morphologic expression of neoplasia (dysplasia). Morphologic evaluation of dysplasia is fraught with error, and, as a result, often leads to false-negative and false-positive diagnoses. Early "crypt dysplasia" is difficult to detect, and is often missed in routine biopsy specimens. Some studies show substantial progression rates of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and crypt dysplasia, to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Dysplasia, even when fully developed, may, in certain circumstances, be difficult to differentiate from non-dysplastic (regenerating) BE. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe and effective method for removing mucosa at risk of cancer. Given the difficulties of dysplasia assessment in mucosal biopsies, and the molecular characteristics of ND-BE, this technique should be considered for treatment of all BE patients, including those with ND or LGD. Post-ablation neo-squamous epithelium reveals no molecular abnormalities, and is biologically stable. Given that prospective randomized controlled trials of ablative therapy for ND-BE aiming at reducing EAC incidence and mortality are unlikely to be completed in the near future, endoscopic ablation is a valid management option. The success of RFA in achieving safe, uniform, reliable, and predictable elimination of BE allows surgeons to combine fundoplication with RFA. Currently, there is no type of treatment for dysplastic or non-dysplastic BE that achieves a complete response in 100% of patients, eliminates all risk of developing cancer, results in zero adverse events, is less expensive in terms of absolute costs than surveillance, is durable for 20+ years, or eliminates the need for surveillance. Regardless, RFA shows established safety, efficacy, durability, and cost-effective profiles that should be considered in the management of patients with non-dysplastic or low-grade dysplastic BE.

A systematic review of the evidence for radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation with the HALO system is a new option for the treatment of patients with Barrett's esophagus. This systematic review summarizes the results of all relevant publications on this topic to answer patient-relevant clinical questions and to evaluate the potential benefit and harm of this new therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE and CENTRAL up to May 2009 was performed. To identify the relevant literature, references were evaluated by two reviewers independently. The inclusion criteria for the review required that studies investigated patients with Barrett's esophagus, used radiofrequency ablation as the intervention, and had a minimum follow-up period of 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of nine relevant observational studies (involving 429 patients) were identified. Complete eradication of Barrett's esophagus dysplasia and metaplasia was achieved respectively for 71-100% and for 46-100% of the patients. Only six cases of stenosis and one case of buried intestinal metaplasia were reported among all the patients. Only a few mild adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the evidence of observational studies, the summary of the current data suggests that radiofrequency ablation with the HALO system could be a promising method associated with a low complication rate, low risk of stricture formations, and a minor probability of buried glands. To evaluate the potential benefit at a higher level of evidence, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a direct comparison with other more established endoscopic methods such as photodynamic therapy are necessary.

A systematic review of the evidence for radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation with the HALO system is a new option for the treatment of patients with Barrett's esophagus. This systematic review summarizes the results of all relevant publications on this topic to answer patient-relevant clinical questions and to evaluate the potential benefit and harm of this new therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE and CENTRAL up to May 2009 was performed. To identify the relevant literature, references were evaluated by two reviewers independently. The inclusion criteria for the review required that studies investigated patients with Barrett's esophagus, used radiofrequency ablation as the intervention, and had a minimum follow-up period of 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of nine relevant observational studies (involving 429 patients) were identified. Complete eradication of Barrett's esophagus dysplasia and metaplasia was achieved respectively for 71-100% and for 46-100% of the patients. Only six cases of stenosis and one case of buried intestinal metaplasia were reported among all the patients. Only a few mild adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the evidence of observational studies, the summary of the current data suggests that radiofrequency ablation with the HALO system could be a promising method associated with a low complication rate, low risk of stricture formations, and a minor probability of buried glands. To evaluate the potential benefit at a higher level of evidence, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a direct comparison with other more established endoscopic methods such as photodynamic therapy are necessary.

Treatment of ultralong-segment Barrett's using focal and balloon-based radiofrequency ablation

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) is being evaluated as definitive treatment for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). Guidelines have yet to be developed for the application of this technology to patients with ultralong-segment BE (ULBE, > or = 8 cm). This study reports a single institution's experience with ERFA of ULBE.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with ULBE undergoing ERFA from August 2005 to February 2009 was conducted. The entire segment of intestinal metaplasia (IM) was treated at each session using balloon- and/or plate-based devices (BARRX Medical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). Retreatments, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), dilations, and biopsies were performed based on endoscopic findings. Surveillance was conducted according to standard guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (22 male) with a median age of 66 years [interquartile range (IQR) 57-74 years] were included. The length of BE treated was 10 cm (median; IQR 8-12 cm). Intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) was present in 3 patients, 15 had high-grade dysplasia (HGD), 6 had low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and 1 had IM without dysplasia. Complications for all 25 patients included hemorrhage (n = 1), stricture (n = 2), and nausea and vomiting (n = 2). Time from the initial procedure was such that 15 patients had postablation biopsies at least once. One patient with biopsies elected to undergo esophagectomy. Of these patients, 78.5% (11/14) had complete response (CR; no residual IM), two patients regressed from HGD to IM, and one patient with IMC had residual HGD and was treated with repeat EMR. The number of ablations in this group was 2.5 (median, IQR 2-3) during a median follow-up time of 20.3 months (IQR 10.4-29.2 months).

CONCLUSION

ERFA is safe and feasible in patients with ULBE and can be applied to the entire length of IM during one session. Eradication of BE can be achieved with few repeat ablations and continued, vigilant surveillance.