Comparative study of balloon and metal olive dilators for endoscopic management of benign anastomotic rectal strictures: clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes

The Safety of Dilation of Ileoanal Strictures With Mechanical or Balloon Dilation Is Similar Among Patients After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic strictures occur in up to 38% of patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). We sought to compare the safety, effectiveness, and durability of mechanical dilation using a Hegar dilator to endoscopic through-the-scope balloon dilation (EBD) among IPAA patients with a rectal or ileoanal anastomotic stricture.

METHODS

We identified adult patients with an IPAA for ulcerative colitis (UC) who underwent a pouchoscopy between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, at a single institution. We compared the effectiveness (median maximum diameter of dilation [MMD]), safety, and durability of mechanical and balloon dilation using standard statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

A total 74 patients had a stricture at the ileoanal anastomosis and underwent at least 1 mechanical or balloon dilation. The MMD with mechanical dilation was 19 (interquartile range [IQR], 18-20) mm for the first dilation and 20 (IQR, 18-20) mm for the second and third dilations. With balloon dilation, the MMD was 12 (IQR, 12-18) mm for the first dilation, 15 (IQR, 12-16.5) mm for the second dilation, and 18 (IQR, 15-18.5) mm for the third dilation. Patients undergoing mechanical dilation experienced a longer duration to second dilation (median 191 days vs 53 days: P < .001), with no difference in complications such as bleeding or perforation noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ileoanal and rectal strictures, mechanical and balloon approaches to dilation demonstrated similar safety profiles and effectiveness. Mechanical dilation with Hegar dilators appears to be an effective and safe approach to the treatment of distal strictures after IPAA.

Endoscopic Stricturoplasty with Linear Stapler: An Efficient Alternative for the Refractory Rectal Anastomotic Stricture

INTRODUCTION

Symptomatic anastomotic stricture is a rare but major complication after left-sided colorectal surgery. Hydraulic balloon dilatation is the first-line treatment in cases where the complication occurs, but 20% of patients present with refractory strictures after multiple sessions. Endoscopic stricturoplasty with the use of a linear stapler is a novel therapeutic alternative for those difficult cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all patients in our department who underwent endoscopic stricturoplasty with a linear stapler between 2004 and 2022. The technical, periinterventional, and follow-up data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified nine patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The procedure was technically possible in eight cases, whereas in one case, the anatomy of the anastomosis did not allow for a correct placement of the stapler. All patients with a technically successful procedure were relieved from their symptoms and could have their ostomy reversed. There was no periprocedural morbidity and mortality. Two patients presented with a recurrent stricture eight and 26 months after the initial stricturoplasty, and the procedure was successfully repeated in both cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic stricturoplasty is a feasible, safe, and minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of refractory anastomotic strictures in the distal colon and rectum for patients with a suitable anatomy.

Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Anastomotic Stenosis After Colorectal Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic stenosis is a common complication of colorectal cancer surgery with anastomosis. Transanal minimally invasive surgery is a novel approach to the treatment of anastomotic stenosis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transanal minimally invasive surgery for anastomotic stenosis treatment.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center.

PATIENTS

This study included patients with rectal anastomotic stenosis who after undergoing colorectal surgery were admitted to the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital between September 2017 and June 2019.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the operative success rate. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, stoma closure conditions, and stenosis recurrence risks.

RESULTS

Nine patients, aged 52 to 80 years, with a history of colorectal cancer with end-to-end anastomosis underwent transanal minimally invasive surgery for anastomotic stenosis. The distance between the stenosis and the anal verge ranged from 5 to 12 cm. The mean stenosis diameter was 0.3 cm. Four patients had completely obstructed rectal lumens. Eight of 9 patients successfully underwent transanal minimally invasive surgery radial incision and cutting. The average operation time was 50 minutes. After the procedure, 1 patient had symptomatic procedure-associated perforations but recovered with conservative treatment. No perioperative mortality occurred. One patient underwent transverse colostomy 1 month after transanal minimally invasive surgery because of proximal colon ischemia induced by primary rectal surgery. Eight patients underwent protective loop ileostomy. After transanal minimally invasive surgery, stoma closure was performed in 88% of patients with no stenosis recurrence or obstruction at follow-up (21-42 mo).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its small sample size and single-center design.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal minimally invasive surgery provides an excellent operative field, good maneuverability, and versatile instrumentation and is a safe and effective treatment for rectal anastomotic stenosis, especially for severe fibrotic stenosis or complete obstruction. See Dynamic Article Video at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B965 .

Endoscopic Stricturotomy for Patients With Postoperative Benign Anastomotic Stricture for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Postoperative benign anastomotic stricture is associated with colorectal anastomosis following surgery for colorectal cancer. Endoscopic stricturotomy is a novel technique that has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for the treatment of colorectal anastomotic stricture in several case reports and series.

OBJECTIVE

We designed this study to investigate the efficacy of endoscopic stricturotomy for postoperative benign anastomotic stricture in patients for colorectal cancer. The primary outcomes were stricture-recurrence-free survival and reoperation-free survival.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTING

This study presents a single-center experience.

PATIENTS

This retrospective study included patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection and developed anastomotic stricture between January 2014 and June 2019 and were treated with endoscopic stricturotomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Immediate technical success of endoscopic stricturotomy and the factors associated with success and recurrence were investigated.

RESULTS

Endoscopic stricturotomy was performed in 57 patients, and immediate technical success was achieved in 84% of the patients. The mean follow-up was 31.3 (15.8) months (range, 9-74 months). Postoperative benign anastomotic stricture recurred in 11 patients after initial successful endoscopic stricturotomy; 10 of the 11 recurrent patients accepted reoperation. Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that length of stricture ≥1 cm was an independent risk factor for failure of the initial endoscopic stricturotomy (OR, 9.423; 95% CI, 1.729-51.350; p = 0.010) and the recurrence of postoperative benign anastomotic stricture after the initial endoscopic stricturotomy (OR, 13.521; 95% CI, 2.305-79.306; p = 0.004).

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its small sample size and retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic stricturotomy is a safe and effective technique for postoperative benign anastomotic stricture. However, if the length of the stricture is ≥1 cm, endoscopic stricturotomy may not be effective, and recurrence of postoperative benign anastomotic stricture is also likely. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B739.

ESTRICTUROTOMA ENDOSCPICA PARA PACIENTES CON ESTRICCIN ANASTOMTICA BENIGNA POSTOPERATORIA PARA EL CNCER COLORRECTAL

ANTECEDENTES:La estenosis anastomótica benigna postoperatoria se asocia con anastomosis colorrectal después de la cirugía para el cáncer colorrectal. La estricturotomia endoscópica es una técnica novedosa que se ha demostrado que es segura y efectiva para el tratamiento de la estenosis anastomótica colorrectal en varios informes de casos o series.OBJETIVO:Diseñamos este estudio para investigar la eficacia de la estricturotomia endoscópica para la estenosis anastomótica benigna postoperatoria en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. El resultado primario fue la supervivencia libre de restricción estricta y la supervivencia libre de reoperación.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio retrospectivo.CONFIGURACIÓN:Este estudio presenta una experiencia de un solo centro.PACIENTES:Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó pacientes con cáncer colorrectal que se sometieron a resección quirúrgica y desarrollaron estenosis anastomótica entre enero de 2014 y junio de 2019 y tratados con estricturotomia endoscópica.MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES DE RESULTADO:Éxito técnico inmediato y estenosurotomía endoscópica, los factores asociados con el éxito y la recurrencia.RESULTADOS:Se realizó estricturotomia endoscópica en 57 pacientes, y se logró un éxito técnico inmediato en el 84% de los pacientes. El seguimiento medio fue de 31,3 (15,8) meses (rango, 9 a 74 meses), el POBAS se repitió en 11 pacientes después del éxito inicial de ESt. 10 de los 11 pacientes recurrentes aceptaron la reoperación. El análisis univariado y multivariado indicó que la longitud de la estenosis ≥1 cm era un factor de riesgo independiente para el fracaso de la estricturotomia endoscópica inicial (odds ratio = 9,423; IC del 95% = 1.729-51.350; p = 0.010) y la recurrencia de estenosis anastomótica benigna postoperatoria después de la estricturotomia endoscópica inicial (odds ratio = 13,521; IC del 95% = 2,305-79,306; p = 0.004).LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por su pequeño tamaño de muestra y diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:La estricturotomia endoscópica es una técnica segura y efectiva para la estructura anastomótica benigna postoperatoria. Sin embargo, si la longitud de la estenosis es ≥1 cm, la estricturotomia endoscópica puede no ser efectiva y también es probable que se repita la estenosis anastomótica benigna postoperatoria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B739.

Management of benign anastomotic strictures following rectal resection: a systematic review

AIM

Benign anastomotic strictures following colorectal surgical resection are a commonly under-reported complication in up to 30% of patients, with a significant impact upon quality of life. In this systematic review, we aim to assess the utility of endoscopic techniques in avoiding the need for surgical reintervention.

METHOD

A literature search was performed for published full text articles using the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases. Additional papers were found by scanning the references of relevant papers.

RESULTS

A total of 34 papers were included, focusing upon balloon dilatation, endoscopic stenting, electroincision, stapler stricturoplasty and cortiocosteroids alone and in combination, with success rates varying from 20% to 100%. The most challenging strictures were reported as those with a narrow lumen, frequently observed following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or an anastomotic leak. Endoscopic balloon dilatation was the most commonly used first-line method; however, repeated dilatations were often required and this was associated with an increased risk of perforation. Although initial success rates for stents were good, patients often experienced stent migration and local symptoms. Only a small number of patients experienced endoscopic management failure and progressed to surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Following identification of an anastomotic stricture and exclusion of underlying malignancy, endoscopic management is both safe and feasible as a first-line option, even if multiple treatment exposures or multimodal management is required. Surgical resection or a defunctioning stoma should be reserved for emergency or failed cases. Further research is required into multimodal and novel therapies to improve quality of life for these patients.

UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice

These are updated guidelines which supersede the original version published in 2004. This work has been endorsed by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the oesophageal section of the BSG. The original guidelines have undergone extensive revision by the 16 members of the Guideline Development Group with representation from individuals across all relevant disciplines, including the Heartburn Cancer UK charity, a nursing representative and a patient representative. The methodological rigour and transparency of the guideline development processes were appraised using the revised Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool.Dilatation of the oesophagus is a relatively high-risk intervention, and is required by an increasing range of disease states. Moreover, there is scarcity of evidence in the literature to guide clinicians on how to safely perform this procedure. These guidelines deal specifically with the dilatation procedure using balloon or bougie devices as a primary treatment strategy for non-malignant narrowing of the oesophagus. The use of stents is outside the remit of this paper; however, for cases of dilatation failure, alternative techniques-including stents-will be listed. The guideline is divided into the following subheadings: (1) patient preparation; (2) the dilatation procedure; (3) aftercare and (4) disease-specific considerations. A systematic literature search was performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Develop-ment and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and decide on the strength of recommendations made.

Anastomotic stricture after ultralow anterior resection or intersphincteric resection for very low-lying rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic stricture following colorectal cancer surgery is not a rare complication, but proper management of anastomotic stricture located close to the anal verge is uncertain. This study aimed to investigate risk factors and management strategies for anastomotic stricture after ultralow anterior resection (ULAR).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a database of patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery between January 2007 and June 2015, and included patients with an anastomosis within 4 cm from the anal verge. Clinical outcomes and risk factors for anastomotic stricture were investigated.

RESULTS

Among the 586 patients included, 46 (7.8%) were diagnosed as having anastomotic stricture. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that intersphincteric resection (ISR) with hand-sewn anastomosis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.070; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.247-7.557) and postoperative radiotherapy (OR 6.237; 95% CI 1.961-19.841) were independent risk factors of anastomotic stricture. Forty-one (89.1%) underwent anastomotic dilatation with a Hegar dilator; while three patients (6.5%) underwent endoscopic balloon dilatation and two (4.3%) underwent surgery initially. Among the patients with initial nonoperative management (n = 44), 21 (47.7%) were completely cured with nonoperative management alone, 12 (27.3%) experienced complications, such as bowel perforation, anastomotic rupture, and perirectal abscess; and 21 (47.7%) underwent further surgical management. Fifteen patients (32.6%) eventually had permanent stoma.

CONCLUSION

ISR with a hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis, compared to ULAR with double-stapling anastomosis, and postoperative radiotherapy were independent risk factors of anastomotic stricture after surgery for very low-lying rectal cancer. Nonoperative anastomotic dilatation showed poor clinical outcome, with high complication rates, and subsequent surgical management. Therefore, nonoperative management of such patients should be carefully selected.

Diagnosis and treatment of iatrogenic anorectal stenosis

Iatrogenic anorectal stenosis is one of serious complications after anorectal surgery, and it is often caused by improper operation in surgical resection of hemorrhoids and anal fistula, procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH), internal hemorrhoid agent injection and saving anal sphincter in low rectal cancer. Because of the difficulty of defecation, severe anal pain may occur. Stenotic ring can be directly touched in anal and low rectal stenosis. The degree and extent of the stenosis can be observed by colonoscopy in upper rectal stenosis. Mild stenosis can be temporarily treated with conservative therapy. If the degree of stenosis does not relieve or stenosis is more severe, we can choose different types of surgery according to the position, scope and the reasons of stenosis, which include scar closed procedure, longitudinal incision and transverse suture procedure, thread-drawing procedure, reconstruction of the anus by skin flap transposition or colostomy. Although only one procedure was adopted in the majority of cases, two or more procedures can be combined. This article reviews the diagnosis and treatment of anorectal stenosis.

Bougie dilators: simple, safe and cost-effective treatment for Crohn's-related fibrotic anal strictures

Anal strictures with fibrotic induration have been shown to develop in up to 50% of all patients with Crohn's disease (CD) with anal ulceration. We evaluate the technical feasibility, safety and long-term efficacy of bougie dilation for a subgroup of patients with symptomatic Crohn's-related fibrotic anal strictures. Bougie dilation is simple to perform, relatively inexpensive and has a low risk of complications.

Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis is a surgical challenge, but despite its technical difficulties and the high associated morbidity risk, it may represent the only valuable option to improve patients' quality of life by avoiding a permanent stoma and decreasing chronic pelvic symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze postoperative and long-term outcomes, with particular focus on functional results, in patients undergoing redo surgery in comparison with previously published studies.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data in an institutional database.

SETTING

The study was conducted in the colorectal unit of a tertiary referral teaching hospital in France.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients who underwent redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis from 1998 to 2011 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients (23 men, 27 women) were included. The median age at redo surgery was 62 years (range, 40-84). Twenty-six patients (52%) underwent a redo colorectal anastomosis and 24 patients a redo coloanal anastomosis (48%). Indications were anastomotic stricture (n = 20), chronic pelvic sepsis (n = 14), rectovaginal fistula (n = 3), prior Hartmann's procedure for complication of initial anastomosis (n = 8), and anastomotic cancer recurrence (n = 5). The median operative time was 435 minutes. Postoperative mortality was 0% and morbidity was 26%. No anastomotic leakage occurred. After a median follow-up of 21 (range, 1-137) months, 44 patients (88%) were evaluated for functional results. The median number of bowel movements per day was 2 (range, 1-10), with 70% of patients having fewer than 3 per day.

LIMITATION

The study was limited by its retrospective nature and lack of data on quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis is a valuable surgical option which allows avoidance of a permanent stoma in nearly 90% of patients. It remains a major undertaking with high intraoperative and postoperative morbidity.