Length of Barrett's segment predicts success of extensive endomucosal resection for eradication of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia

Durability of radiofrequency ablation for long-segment and ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus over 10 years

BACKGROUND

Long-term durability data for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma in long-segment (LSBE) and ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus (ULSBE) is lacking. This study aimed to determine 10-year cancer progression, eradication, and complication rates in LSBE and ULSBE patients treated with RFA.

METHODS

Single-surgeon prospective database of patients with LSBE (≥ 3 to < 8 cm) and ULSBE (≥ 8 cm) who underwent RFA (2001-2021) were retrospectively analyzed. Ten-year cancer progression calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Eradication rates, including complete remission of dysplasia (CR-D) and intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM), and rates of recurrence and complications, compared between LSBE and ULSBE groups.

RESULTS

Ten years after starting treatment, the cancer rate was 14.3% in 56 patients. CR-D and CR-IM rates were 87.5% and 67.9%, respectively. Relapse rates from CR-D were 1.8% and 3.6% from CR-IM. Eradication rates for dysplasia in LSBE and ULSBE patients (90.6% versus 83.3%) and IM (71.9% versus 62.5%) were not significantly different. ULSBE patients required higher mean number of ablation sessions for IM eradication (4.7 versus 3.7, p = 0.032), while complication rates including strictures (4.2% versus 6.2%), perforation (0 versus 0), and bleeding (4.2% versus 3.1%), were similar between ULSBE and LSBE patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, shorter Barrett's segment and baseline low-grade dysplasia were associated with increased likelihood for eradication of IM and dysplasia. A total number of ablation sessions or endoscopic resections ≥ 3 was associated with reduced likelihood for eradication.

CONCLUSION

RFA was durable in maintaining dysplasia and IM eradication in both LSBE and ULSBE over 10 years, and with low complication rates. IM eradication was more difficult to achieve in ULSBE. Late development of cancer occurred in 14.3%.

Clinical and pathological predictors of failure of endoscopic therapy for Barrett's related high-grade dysplasia and early esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multimodal endoscopic treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE) related high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is safe and effective. However, there is a paucity of data to predict the response to endoscopic treatment. This study aimed to identify predictors of failure to achieve complete eradication of neoplasia (CE-N) and complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all HGD/EAC cases treated endoscopically at a tertiary referral center. Only patients with confirmed HGD/EAC from initial endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were included. Potential predictive variables including clinical characteristics, endoscopic features, and index histologic parameters of the EMR specimens were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 457 patients were diagnosed with HGD/EAC by initial EMR from January 2008 to January 2019. Of these, 366 patients who underwent subsequent endoscopic treatment with or without RFA were included. Cumulative incidence rates at 3 years for CE-N and CE-IM were 91.4% (95% CI 87.8-94.2%) and 66.8% (95% CI 61.2-72.3%), respectively during a median follow-up period of 35 months. BE segment of 3-10 cm (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.36-0.57) and > 10 cm (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.15-0.40) were independent clinical predictors associated with failure to achieve CE-N. With respect to CE-IM, increasing age (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-1.00) was another predictor along with BE segment of 3-10 cm (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28-0.49) and > 10 cm (HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.07-0.30). Lymphovascular invasion increased the risk of CE-N and CE-IM failure in EAC cases.

CONCLUSION

Failure to achieve CE-N and CE-IM is associated with long-segment BE and other clinical variables. Patients with these predictors should be considered for a more intensive endoscopic treatment approach at expert centers.

The impact of flexible endoscopy in esophageal surgery

Achalasia and Treatment of esophageal Adenocarcinoma are commonly associated to surgical resection. Newer technologies in interventional endoscopy gave way to a substantial paradigm shift in the management of these conditions. In the case of achalasia, endoscopic myotomy is rapidly displacing Heller's myotomy as the gold standard in many centers. Early stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE) comprising high-grade dysplasia (HGD), intramucosal and, in some cases, submucosal carcinoma is now being treated without the need of esophagectomy. This review presents a summary of the most relevant endoscopic techniques for both achalasia and esophageal cancer. Endoscopic advances in diagnostic and therapeutic arenas allow for minimally invasive therapies and organ preservation in most settings of achalasia and early stage neoplasia of the esophagus provided that the clinical setting and physician's expertise are prepared for this approach.

Radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's-associated intramucosal carcinoma: a multi-center follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), with or without endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), has been validated as a safe, effective and durable treatment option for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Its durability in eradicating Barrett's-associated intramucosal carcinoma (IMC), however, is unclear. We set out to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of RFA for IMC.

METHODS

Retrospective review of two tertiary care facility records for patients undergoing RFA, with or without EMR, for biopsy-proven IMC. Our primary outcome of interest was to quantify the rate of durable complete eradication for intestinal metaplasia and for IMC and associated dysplasia. A multi-variate regression analysis was performed to identify features which correlate with durable eradication of IMC/dysplasia. Our secondary outcome of interest was treatment-related complications.

RESULTS

36 patients (26 male; mean age 64 ± 12 years), with a mean Barrett's length of 3.5 ± 2.5 cm, underwent RFA for biopsy-proven IMC. EMR was performed in 31 (86%) prior to or during RFA. Complete eradication of IMC/dysplasia was achieved in 32/36 (89%) and patients required a mean of 1 ± 1 EMR and 2 ± 1 RFA sessions to achieve eradication. During a mean follow-up period of 24 ± 19 months, durable complete eradication of IMC/dysplasia was achieved in 29/36 (81%) patients. On multi-variate regression analysis, undergoing an EMR prior to RFA was associated with an increased likelihood of maintaining durable eradication of IMC/dysplasia (p = 0.03). Treatment-related complications included: bleeding (3%) and stricture formation (19%).

CONCLUSION

RFA is an effective and durable treatment option for Barrett's-associated IMC. Greater than 80% of patients will achieve and maintain complete eradication of IMC at a mean of 2 years follow-up.

EMR is not inferior to ESD for early Barrett's and EGJ neoplasia: An extensive review on outcome, recurrence and complication rates

Background and study aims In recent years, it has been reported that early Barrett's and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) neoplasia can be effectively and safely treated using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) appears to be the safest EMR method. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the safety and efficacy of MBM compared with ESD for the treatment of early neoplasia in Barrett's or at the EGJ. Methods A literature review of studies published up to May 2013 on EMR and ESD for early Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia and adenocarcinoma at the EGJ was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Results on outcome parameters such as number of curative resections, complications and procedure times are compared and reported. Results A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis in this study. There were no significant differences in recurrence rates when comparing EMR (10/380, 2.6 %) to ESD (1/333, 0.7 %) (OR 8.55; 95 %CI, 0.91 - 80.0, P = 0.06). All recurrences after EMR were treated with additional endoscopic resection. The risks of delayed bleeding, perforation and stricture rates in both groups were similar. The procedure was considerably less time-consuming in the EMR group (mean time 36.7 min, 95 %CI, 34.5 - 38.9) than in the ESD group (mean time 83.3 min, 95 %CI, 57.4 - 109.2). Conclusions The MBM technique for EMR is as effective as ESD when comparing outcomes related to recurrence and complication rates for the treatment of early Barrett's or EGJ neoplasia. The MBM technique is considerably less time-consuming.

Systematic review comparing radiofrequency ablation and complete endoscopic resection in treating dysplastic Barrett's esophagus: a critical assessment of histologic outcomes and adverse events

BACKGROUND

With recent advances in endoscopy, endoscopic techniques have surpassed esophagectomy in the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of complete EMR and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of dysplastic BE.

DESIGN

Systematic review of literature.

PATIENTS

Diagnosis of BE with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer.

INTERVENTION

Complete EMR or RFA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia at the end of treatment and after >12 months' follow-up. Adverse event rates associated with treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only 1 trial directly compared the 2 techniques; most studies were observational case series. Dysplasia was effectively eradicated at the end of treatment in 95% of patients after complete EMR and 92% after RFA. After a median follow-up of 23 months for complete EMR and 21 months for RFA, eradication of dysplasia was maintained in 95% of patients treated with complete EMR and 94% treated with RFA. Short-term adverse events were seen in 12% of patients treated with complete EMR but in only 2.5% of those treated with RFA. Esophageal strictures were adverse events in 38% of patients treated with complete EMR, compared with 4% of those treated with RFA. Progression to cancer appeared to be rare after treatment, although follow-up was short.

LIMITATIONS

Small studies, heterogeneous in design, with variable outcome measures. Also follow-up durations were short, limiting evaluation of long-term durability of both treatments.

CONCLUSION

RFA and complete EMR are equally effective in the short-term treatment of dysplastic BE, but adverse event rates are higher with complete EMR.

Management of early-stage esophageal neoplasia (MESEN) consensus

BACKGROUND

Treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma often involves surgical resection. Newer technologies in interventional endoscopy have led to a substantial paradigm shift in the management of early-stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus comprising high-grade dysplasia (HGD), intramucosal carcinoma, and, in some cases, submucosal carcinoma. However, there has been no consensus regarding the indications for esophageal preservation in these cases. In this work, consensus guidelines were established for the management of early-stage esophageal neoplasia considering clinically relevant aspects (age, comorbidities, and social environment) in each scenario.

METHODS

Seventeen experts were invited to participate based on their background and clinical expertise at high-volume centers. A questionnaire was created that included four clinical scenarios covering a wide range of situations within HGD and/or early esophageal neoplasia, particularly where controversies are likely to exist. Each of the clinical scenarios was open to discussion subdivided by patient age (20, 50, and 80 s). For each clinical scenario an expert was chosen to defend that position. Each defense triggered a subsequent discussion during a consensus meeting. Conclusions of that discussion together with an accompanying literature analysis allowed experts to confirm or change their original choices and served as the basis for the recommendations stated in this article.

RESULTS

There was 100 % consensus supporting esophageal preservation in patients with HGD, independent of patient age or Barrett's length. In patients with T1a adenocarcinoma, consensus for preservation was not reached (65 %) for young and middle-aged individuals but was supported for elderly patients (100 %). For T1b adenocarcinoma, consensus was reached for surgical resection (90 %), leaving organ preservation for patients with very low risk of nodal invasion or poor surgical candidates.

CONCLUSION

Advances in endoscopic imaging and therapy allow for organ preservation in most settings of early-stage neoplasia of the esophagus, provided that the patient understands the implications of this decision.

Barrett's esophagus: review of diagnosis and treatment

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is an acquired condition characterized by replacement of stratified squamous epithelium by a cancer predisposing metaplastic columnar epithelium. Endoscopy with systemic biopsy protocols plays a vital role in diagnosis. Technological advancements in dysplasia detection improves outcomes in surveillance and treatment of patients with BE and dysplasia. These advances in endoscopic technology radically changed the treatment for dysplastic BE and early cancer from being surgical to organ-sparing endoscopic therapy. A multimodal treatment approach combining endoscopic resection of visible and/or raised lesions with ablation techniques for flat BE mucosa, followed by long-term surveillance improves the outcomes of BE. Safe and effective endoscopic treatment can be either tissue acquiring as in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection or tissue ablative as with photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy. Debatable issues such as durability of response, recognition and management of sub-squamous BE and optimal management strategy in patients with low-grade dysplasia and non-dysplastic BE need to be studied further. Development of safer wide field resection techniques, which would effectively remove all BE and obviate the need for long-term surveillance, is another research goal. Shared decision making between the patient and physician is important while considering treatment for dysplasia in BE.

Radiofrequency ablation for long- and ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus: a comparative long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

The safety, efficacy, and durability of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), with or without EMR, have been established for long-segment Barrett's esophagus (LSBE). Ablating ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus (ULSBE) may be associated with increased stricture formation, eradication failure, and treatment session requirements.

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to compare eradication and stricture rates between LSBE (≥3 to <8 cm) and ULSBE (≥8 cm). Our secondary objective was to evaluate treatment durability and session requirements.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Tertiary care facility.

PATIENTS

A total of 72 patients (34 ULSBE, 38 LSBE; mean Barrett's segment length of 10.8 and 4.7 cm) underwent RFA between August 2005 and September 2010. Mean follow-up was 45 and 34 months, respectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Eradication and complication rates for ULSBE and LSBE.

RESULTS

Eradication rates for dysplasia (90% vs 88%, P = 1.0) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) (77% vs 82%, P = .77) were similar. ULSBE patients required more overall (P < .01) and circumferential (P < .01) RFA; however, stricture rates were identical (14%). There was no dysplasia recurrence, and IM recurrence was similar (ULSBE, 23%; LSBE, 16%; P = .52). At 3 years, IM remained eradicated in 65% of ULSBE and 82% of LSBE, without maintenance RFA. On multivariate regression analysis, increasing Barrett's length was associated with a reduced likelihood for eradicating IM (odds ratio 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.00), but not dysplasia (odds ratio 1.13; 95% CI, 0.95-1.35).

LIMITATIONS

Single center.

CONCLUSION

ULSBE can be treated in its entirety at each session with efficacy and safety comparable to LSBE. ULSBE requires more effort to achieve IM eradication, and RFA is less durable in maintaining this eradication at 3-year follow-up.

Evolving changes in the management of early oesophageal adenocarcinoma in a tertiary centre

OBJECTIVES

Series from high volume oesophageal centres highlight an increasing prevalence of early malignant (EM) lesions. The advent of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offer alternatives to traditional surgery. The evolution of this pattern of care in a high volume centre is analysed.

METHODS

Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database. 96 patients were treated with an EM lesion from 2000 to 2011. Surgery was the standard approach during the initial period (2000-2006). In 2007, with the introduction of EMR±RFA to our Centre, a rising trend toward definitive endoscopic treatment was seen. This study details the selection of cases into treatment groups and their outcomes.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2006, 23 patients were treated with EM lesions, 96% by surgery. Seventy-three were treated from 2007 to 2011, 55% surgically and 45% by EMR±RFA. In the entire experience, there was one death from surgery and morbidity was higher in the surgery group compared with EMR±RFA (p<0.001). Three surgical patients (4.8%) relapsed with HGD or cancer, and one patient with T1N1 disease died of disease recurrence. At a median of 13 months, EMR±RFA offered 100% disease control, 72% had no endoscopic or histological evidence of Barrett's oesophagus and one patient represented with low grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the changing pattern of care in the management of early oesophageal cancer. EMR±RFA appears an acceptable alternative to surgery in carefully selected cases. However, long-term outcome analysis using these methods is required and close interdisciplinary collaboration of specialists in gastroenterology, surgery, pathology and radiology is mandatory to achieve optimum outcomes.