The role of endoscopic ultrasound in assessing tumor response and staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer

Advances in Diagnostic, Staging, and Restaging Evaluation of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer

The initial endoscopic and staging evaluation of esophagogastric cancers must be accurate and comprehensive in order to select the optimal therapeutic plan for the patient. Esophageal and gastric cancers (and treatment paradigms) are delineated by their proximity to the cardia (within 2 cm). The most frequent and important symptom that informs the initial staging evaluation is dysphagia, which is associated with at least cT3 or locally advanced disease. Endoscopic ultrasound is often needed if earlier stage disease is suspected, preferably in combination with endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection or fine-needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes to enhance staging accuracy.

The role of FDG PET/CT radiomics in the prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer

Background

Attainment of a complete histopathological response following neoadjuvant therapy has been associated with favorable long-term survival outcomes in esophageal cancer patients. We investigated the ability of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) radiomic features to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of medical records of patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal or esophagogastric junctional cancers. Included patients had a baseline FDG PET/CT scan and underwent Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) protocol followed by surgery. Four demographic variables and 107 PET radiomic features were extracted and analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy.

Results

Overall, 53 FDG-avid primary esophageal cancer lesions were segmented and radiomic features were extracted. Seventeen radiomic features and 2 non-radiomics variables were found to exhibit significant differences between neoadjuvant therapy responders and non-responders. An unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis using these 19 variables classified patients in a manner significantly associated with response to neoadjuvant treatment (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the potential of FDG PET/CT radiomic features as a predictor for the response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer patients. The combination of these radiomic features with select non-radiomic variables provides a model for stratifying patients based on their likelihood to respond to neoadjuvant treatment.

FDG PET/CT and Endoscopic Ultrasound for Preoperative T-Staging of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and FDG PET/CT in the preoperative T-staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and determine whether their innovative coordination achieves better prediction. In total, 100 patients diagnosed with ESCC, 57 without (CRT[-]sub) and 43 with (CRT[+]sub) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, undergoing EUS and FDG PET/CT, followed by surgical resection of the tumor, were included in this analysis. EUS classified T-stages based on the depth of primary tumor invasion, and FDG PET/CT used thresholded maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) classifications. By employing pathology results as the reference standard, we assessed the accuracy of EUS and FDG PET/CT, evaluated their concordance using the κ statistic, and conducted a comparative analysis between the two modalities through McNemar's chi-square test. FDG PET/CT had higher overall accuracy than EUS (for CRT[-]sub: 71.9%, κ = 0.56 vs. 56.1%, κ = 0.31, p = 0.06; for CRT[+]sub: 65.1%, κ = 0.50 vs. 18.6%, κ = 0.05, p < 0.01) in predicting pT- and ypT-stage. Our proposed method of incorporating both FDG PET/CT and EUS information could achieve higher accuracies in differentiating between early and locally advanced disease in the CRT[-]sub group (82.5%) and determining residual viable tumor in the CRT[+]sub group (83.7%) than FDG PET/CT or EUS alone. FDG PET/CT had a better diagnostic ability than EUS to predict the (y)pT-stage of ESCC. Our complementary method, which combines the advantages of both imaging modalities, can deliver higher accuracy for clinical applications of ESCC.

Preoperative EUS vs. PET-CT Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophagogastric Cancer and Its Correlation with Survival

BACKGROUND

The objective of our study was to investigate whether Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) restaging can predict survival in upper gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas and to assess their accuracy when compared to pathology.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on all patients who underwent EUS for staging of gastric or esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2021. EUS and PET-CT were performed, and preoperative TNM restaging was conducted using both procedures within 21 days prior to surgery. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 185 patients (74.7% male) were included in the study. The accuracy of EUS for distinguishing between T1-T2 and T3-T4 tumors after neoadjuvant therapy was 66.7% (95% CI: 50.3-77.8%), and for N staging, the accuracy was 70.8% (95% CI: 51.8-81.8%). Regarding PET-CT, the accuracy for N positivity was 60.4% (95% CI: 46.3-73%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant correlation between positive lymph nodes on restaging EUS and PET-CT with DFS. Multivariate COX regression analysis identified N restaging with EUS and PET-CT, as well as the Charlson comorbidity index, as correlated factors with DFS. Positive lymph nodes on EUS and PET-CT were predictors of OS. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the independent risk factors for OS were found to be the Charlson comorbidity index, T response by EUS, and male sex.

CONCLUSION

Both EUS and PET-CT are valuable tools for determining the preoperative stage of esophago-gastric cancer. Both techniques can predict survival, with preoperative N staging and response to neoadjuvant therapy assessed by EUS being the main predictors.

Evaluation of tumor regression by neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs) are treated with multimodal therapy, namely surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) depending on patient and tumor level factors. Yet, there is little consensus on choice of the optimum systemic therapy. To compare the pathological complete response (pCR) after FLOT, non-FLOT-based chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy regimes in patients with EACs. A systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Review and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they had investigated the use of chemo(radio)therapy regimens in the neoadjuvant setting for EAC and reported the pCR rates. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to compare the pooled pCR rates between FLOT, non-FLOT and CRT cohorts. We included 22 studies that described tumor regression post-NAC. Altogether, 1,056 patients had undergone FLOT or DCF regimes, while 1,610 patients had received ECF or ECX. The pCR rates ranged from 3.3% to 54% for FLOT regimes, while pCR ranged between 0% and 31% for ECF/ECX protocols. Pooled random-effects meta-meta-analysis of proportions showed a statistically significant higher incidence of pCR in FLOT-based chemotherapy at 0.148 (95%CI: 0.080, 0.259) compared with non-FLOT-based chemotherapy at 0.074 (95%CI: 0.042, 0.129). However, pCR rates were significantly highest at 0.250 (95%CI: 0.202, 0.306) for CRT. The use of enhanced FLOT-based regimens have improved the pCR rates for chemotherapeutic regimes but still falls short of pathological outcomes from CRT. Further work can characterize clinical responses to neoadjuvant therapy and determine whether an organ-preservation strategy is feasible.

Why is endosonography insufficient for residual diagnosis after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer? Solutions using muscle layer evaluation

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of residual tumors using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer is considered challenging. However, the reasons for this difficulty are not well understood.

AIM

To investigate the ultrasound imaging features of residual tumors and identify the limitations and potential of EUS.

METHODS

This exploratory prospective observational study enrolled 23 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy [15 patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and 8 patients after chemoradiotherapy (CRT)] at the Department of Surgery, Chiba University Hospital, between May 2020 and October 2021. We diagnosed the T stage for specimens using ultrasound just after surgery and compared ultrasound images with the cut surface of the fixed specimens of the same level of residual tumor. The ratio of esophageal muscle layer defect measured by ultrasound was compared with clinicopathological factors. Furthermore, the rate of reduction for the muscle layer defect was evaluated using EUS images obtained before and after neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

The accuracy of T stage rate was 61% (n = 14/23), which worsened after CRT (38%, n = 3/8) than after NAC (73%, n = 11/15) because of overstaging. Moreover, pT0 could not be diagnosed in all cases. The detection rate of residual tumor for specimens using ultrasound retrospectively was 75% (n = 15/20). There was no correlation between after-NAC (79%, n = 11/14) and after-CRT (67%, n = 4/6) detection rate. The detection of superficial and submucosal types was poor. The pathologic tumor size and pathological response were correlated. Tumor borders were irregular and echogenicity was mixed type after CRT. There was a correlation between the pT stage (pT0/1 vs pT2/3) and the length of muscle layer circumference (P = 0.025), the length of muscle layer defect (P < 0.001), and the ratio of muscle layer defect (P < 0.001). There was also a correlation between the pT stage and the rate of muscle layer defect reduction measured by EUS (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to pathological images, some tumors are undetectable by ultrasound. Focusing on the esophageal muscle layer might help diagnose the depth of the residual tumor.

Difference in Computed Tomography Image Quality between Central Vein and Peripheral Vein Enhancement in Treatment Naive Esophageal Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

A chest CT via central vein enhancement not only eliminates peripheral vein regurgitation but also provides better image quality that facilitates precise clinical staging. A chest CT via central vein enhancement may be considered after tissue proof in order to better discriminate disease severity.

Abstract

The differences in chest computed tomography (CT) image quality may affect the tumor stage. The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and accuracy of chest CT via central vein and peripheral vein enhancement. Fifty consecutive patients were enrolled from a tertiary medical center in Taiwan from May 2016 to March 2019. All the patients received a chest CT via central vein enhancement prior to neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation in order to compare the chest CT that was obtained via the peripheral vein. In addition, blind independent central reviews of chest CT via central vein and peripheral vein enhancement were conducted. For T and N stage, chest CT via central vein enhancement had a greater consistency with endoscopic ultrasonography and positron-emission tomography-computed tomography findings (kappa coefficients 0.4471 and 0.5564, respectively). In addition, chest CT via central vein enhancement also showed excellent agreement in the blind independent central review (kappa coefficient 0.9157). The changes in the T and N stage resulted in stage migration in 16 patients. Chest CT via central vein enhancement eliminated peripheral vein regurgitation and also provided more precise clinical staging. This study is registered under the registered NCT number 02887261.

Beyond the Guidelines: The Grey Zones of the Management of Gastric Cancer. Consensus Statements from the Gastric Cancer Italian Network (GAIN)

BACKGROUND

Management of gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains challenging, because of the heterogeneity in tumor biology within the upper gastrointestinal tract. Daily clinical practice is full of grey areas regarding the complexity of diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic procedures. The aim of this paper is to provide a guide for clinicians facing challenging situations in routine practice, taking a multidisciplinary consensus approach based on available literature.

METHODS

The GAIN (GAstric cancer Italian Network) group was established with the aims of reviewing literature evidence, discussing key issues in prevention, diagnosis, and management of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma, and offering a summary of statements. A Delphi consensus method was used to obtain opinions from the expert panel of specialists.

RESULTS

Forty-nine clinical questions were identified in six areas of interest: role of multidisciplinary team; risk factors; diagnosis; management of early gastric cancer and multimodal approach to localized gastric cancer; treatment of elderly patients with locally advanced resectable disease; and treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The statements presented may guide clinicians in practical management of this disease.

Preoperative EUS evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant therapy for gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer is correlated with survival: A single retrospective study of 97 patients

Background and Objectives:

The European Society for Medical Oncology suggests performing EUS staging for esophagogastric junction and gastric cancers to further assess the T and N stages. The use of EUS after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is still under debate. We aimed to evaluate the contribution of EUS after NT to staging, therapeutic choices, and prognosis prediction.

Subjects and Methods:

In 97 patients with esophagogastric junction and gastric cancers who received NT (chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy) followed by carcinologic surgery, EUS was performed before (uT, uN) and after (yuT, yuN) NT. We compared the results of EUS staging after NT (yuT and yuN) and final histology (ypT and ypN). We analyzed the correlation between overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and the objective and subjective responses to NT evaluated by EUS (comparison of uT and yuT and uN and yuN with OS and DFS).

Results:

EUS staging detected metastasis that went undetected by computed tomography in 16% of metastatic patients. The accuracy between EUS after NT and postoperative pathological findings was 44.4% (34.2%; 54.7%) for T stage and 49.3% (37.5%; 61.1%) for N stage. On multivariate analysis, OS had significantly correlated with the objective response to NT. In the case of a response to NT, the median OS was 64.77 months, and in the case of stable disease, the median OS was 22.9 months (P = 0.01).

Conclusion:

EUS after NT can be used for staging. Despite its moderate accuracy, the evaluation of the response to NT by EUS seems to be correlated with patient prognosis.

Contribution of FDG-PET/CT to the management of esophageal cancer patients at multidisciplinary tumor board conferences

Background

A multidisciplinary team approach to the management of esophageal cancer patients leads to better clinical decisions.

Purpose

The contribution of CT, endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasound to clinical staging and treatment selection by multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB) in patients with esophageal cancer is well documented. However, there is a paucity of data addressing the role that FDG-PET/CT (PET/CT) plays to inform the clinical decision-making process at MTB conferences. The aim of this study was to assess the impact and contribution of PET/CT to clinical management decisions and to the plan of care for esophageal cancer patients at the MTB conferences held at our institution.

Materials and methods

This IRB approved study included all the cases discussed in the esophageal MTB meetings over a year period. The information contributed by PET/CT to MTB decision making was grouped into four categories. Category I, no additional information provided for clinical management; category II, equivocal and misguiding information; category III, complementary information to other imaging modalities, and category IV, information that directly changed clinical management. The overall impact on management was assessed retrospectively from prospectively discussed clinical histories, imaging, histopathology, and the official minutes of the MTB conferences.

Results

79 patients (61 males and 18 females; median age, 61 years, range, 33–86) with esophageal cancer (53 adenocarcinomas and 26 squamous cell carcinomas) were included. The contribution of PET/CT-derived information was as follows: category I in 50 patients (63%); category II in 3 patients (4%); category III in 8 patients (10%), and category IV information in 18 patients (23%). Forty-five patients (57%) had systemic disease, and in 5 (11%) of these, metastatic disease was only detected by PET/CT. In addition, PET/CT detected previously unknown recurrence in 4 (9%) of 43 patients. In summary, PET/CT provided clinically useful information to guide management in 26 of 79 esophageal cancer patients (33%) discussed at the MTB.

Conclusion

The study showed that PET/CT provided additional information and changed clinical management in 1 out of 3 (33%) esophageal cancer cases discussed at MTB conferences. These results support the inclusion whenever available, of FDG-PET/CT imaging information to augment and improve the patient management decision process in MTB conferences.

Clinical outcomes according to the modified endoscopic criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) followed by surgery is one of the standard treatments for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, endoscopic evaluation of a primary lesion is not recommended during nCT because of reduced objectivity. This study aimed to develop and validate endoscopic evaluation criteria for nCT.

METHODS

This study retrospectively investigated patients with T2/3 ESCC who underwent nCT followed by radical esophagectomy across two institutions (test and validation sets). We retrospectively estimated the therapeutic effect by classifying patients according to degree of tumor shrinkage (evaluated with endoscopy) as follows: marked reduction (MR), half reduction (HR), insufficient reduction (IR), and progressive disease (PD). Three endoscopists evaluated patients in the test set. Another three endoscopists evaluated patients in the validation set. We analyzed recurrence-free survival (RFS) 3 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Of 129 patients in the test set, 44 had MR, 35 had HR, 44 had IR, and six had PD. The 3-year RFS rates were 55% (overall), 79% (MR), 54% (HR), 35% (IR), and 33% (PD). Of 91 patients in the validation set, 22 had MR, 49 had HR, 18 had IR, and two had PD. The 3-year RFS rates were 54% (overall), 77% (MR), 55% (HR), 22% (IR), and 50% (PD).

CONCLUSIONS

Our endoscopic criteria for nCT predicted prognosis; however, future studies are needed to further investigate our criteria before general application in the clinical setting.

Detecting Pathological Complete Response in Esophageal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on Imaging Techniques: A Diagnostic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Up to 32% of patients with esophageal cancer show a pathological complete response (ypCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. To prevent overtreatment, the indication to perform esophagectomy in these patients should be reconsidered. Implementing an organ-preserving strategy for patients with ypCR requires an accurate assessment of residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effectiveness of imaging techniques used for detection of ypCR after neoadjuvant therapy but before resection in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed from January 1, 2000, to December 13, 2017. Eligible studies were diagnostic studies that compared results of imaging modalities after neoadjuvant therapy to histopathological findings in the resection specimen after esophagectomy. Methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, version 2, model. Primary outcome measures were true positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true negative values of imaging techniques predicting ypCR. A meta-analysis was performed by pooling sensitivities and specificities by using a bivariate model.

RESULTS

A total of 4420 articles were identified. After exclusion of irrelevant titles and abstracts, 360 articles were reviewed in full text. In total, four imaging modalities (computed tomography [CT], positron emission tomography [PET-CT], endoscopic ultrasound [EUS], and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were used for restaging. The meta-analysis was conducted with data from 56 studies involving 3625 patients. The pooled sensitivities of CT, PET-CT, EUS, and MRI for detecting ypCR were 0.35, 0.62, 0.01 and 0.80, respectively, whereas the pooled specificities were 0.83, 0.73, 0.99, and 0.83, respectively. The positive predictive value in detecting ypCR was 0.47 for CT, 0.41 for PET-CT, not applicable for EUS, and 0.61 for MRI.

CONCLUSION

Current imaging modalities such as CT, PET-CT, and EUS seem to be insufficiently accurate to identify complete responders. More accurate diagnostic tests are needed to improve restaging accuracy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Low-dose spectral insufflation computed tomography protocol preoperatively optimized for T stage esophageal cancer - preliminary research experience

AIM

To evaluate the T stage of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) using preoperative low-dose esophageal insufflation computed tomography (EICT).

METHODS

One hundred and twenty ESCC patients confirmed by surgery or esophagoscopy were divided into three groups. Groups B and C were injected with 300 mgI/kg contrast medium for automatic spectral imaging assist (GSI assist), while group A underwent a conventional 120 kVp computed tomography (CT) scan with a 450 mgI/kg contrast medium injection. EICT was performed in group C. Group A was reconstructed with filtered back projection, and groups B and C were reconstructed with 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. The contrast-to-noise ratio of lesion-to-mediastinal adipose tissue and the radiation dose were measured. Specific imaging features were observed, and T stage ESCCs were evaluated.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and accuracy of the T1/2 stage were higher in group C than in groups A and B (sensitivity: 43.75% vs 31.82% and 33.33%; accuracy: 54.29% vs 46.67% and 52.50%, respectively). With regard to the T3 stage, the sensitivity and specificity in group C were higher than those in groups A and B (sensitivity: 56.25% vs 41.17% and 44.44%; specificity: 73.68% vs 67.86% and 63.64%, respectively). The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the T4 stage were similar among all groups. There were no significant differences in volume CT dose index [(5.91 ± 2.57) mGy vs (3.24 ± 1.20) vs (3.65 ± 1.77) mGy], dose-length product [(167.10 ± 99.08) mGy•cm vs (113.24 ± 54.46) mGy•cm vs (117.98 ± 32.32) mGy•cm] and effective dose [(2.52 ± 1.39) vs (1.63 ± 0.76) vs (1.73 ± 0.44) mSv] among the groups (P > 0.05). However, groups B and C received similar effective doses but lower iodine loads than group A [(300 vs 450) mgI/kg].

CONCLUSION

EICT combined with GSI assist allows differential diagnosis between the T1/2 and T3 stages. The ability to differentially diagnose the T3 and T4 stages of medullary ESCC can be improved by quantitatively and qualitatively analyzing the adipose tissue in front of the vertebral body.

Endoscopic evaluation of the esophageal cancer patient after chemoradiotherapy for persistent/recurrent cancer

Endoscopy has an important role in the pre- and post-treatment staging of esophageal cancer. Complete pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy occurs in approximately 25% of patients. However, the ability to accurately detect this preoperatively with currently available endoscopic modalities is limited such that the default pathway is for fit patients to proceed with surgical resection. This article discusses the available endoscopic modalities (primarily Esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD] with mucosal biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography with or without fine needle aspiration) used for post-treatment staging of esophageal cancer. We present data regarding the benefits and limitations of endoscopic methods in assessing for residual disease. Unfortunately, endoscopic modalities are not accurate enough to identify complete pathological responsers who may avoid surgical resection.

Prognostic relevance of serial endoscopic ultrasound after chemoradiation in esophageal cancer

The objective of this study is the feasibility of sequential endoscopic and endosonographic measurement of locoregional tumor load for the prediction of tumor recurrence in patients after neoadjuvant or definitive chemoradiotherapy, treated in curative intent for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. In 67 patients with esophageal cancer, serial endoscopic ultrasound was performed before and after neoadjuvant (25) or definitive (42) chemoradiotherapy. Rate of complete endoscopic and endosonographic tumor response, reduction in tumor length or circumferential tumorous extension, maximal tumor thickness, lymph node size, and endosonographic uT- and uN-stage shift was measured. Results were correlated with tumor recurrence rate. After chemoradiotherapy, endosonography revealed a complete response of the primary tumor in 27 patients, and complete resolution of suspicious lymph nodes in 24 patients. According to uTN-stage, 43 patients showed a therapeutic response, with stage shift to a lower tumor stage. In patients with macroscopic residual disease, mean tumor thickness decreased from 13 to 9 mm, with nine patients presenting with a decrease of >50%. Mean tumor length decreased from 5.6 to 4.6 cm, with 10 patients showing a decrease of >50%. Mean lymph node size decreased from 14.5 to 12 mm, with four patients having a reduction in size of >50%. Tumor response was generally more pronounced after definitive than after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. During follow-up, 33 patients developed a tumor recurrence. None of the endoscopic and endosonographic parameter analyzed was predictive for patient's prognosis, irrespective of the kind of chemoradiotherapy (neoadjuvant or definitive). Sequential measurement of locoregional tumor load with endoscopic ultrasound before and after chemoradiotherapy is not suitable for the prediction of tumor recurrence risk.

Sterilization of tumor-positive lymph nodes of esophageal cancer by neo-adjuvant treatment is associated with worse survival compared to tumor-negative lymph nodes treated with surgery first

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Lymph node (LN) involvement by esophageal cancer is associated with compromised long-term prognosis. This study assessed whether LN downstaging by neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) might offer a survival benefit compared to patients with a priori negative LN.

METHODS

Patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer between 2005 and 2014 were screened for inclusion. Group 1 included cN0 patients confirmed as pN0 who were treated with surgery first, whereas group 2 included patients initially cN+ and down-staged to ypN0 after NAT. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included in our study, 24 in group 1 and 33 in group 2. Group 2 patients had more locally advanced lesions compared to a priori negative patients, and despite complete LN sterilization by NAT they still had worse long-term survival. Overall 3-year survival was 86.8% for a priori LN negative versus 63.3% for downstaged patients (P = 0.013), while disease-free survival was 79.6% and 57.9%, respectively (P = 0.021). Tumor recurrence was also earlier and more disseminated for the down-staged group.

CONCLUSIONS

Downstaged LN, despite the systemic effect of NAT, still inherit an increased risk for early tumor recurrence and worse long-term survival compared to a priori negative LN.

FDG PET using SUVmax for preoperative T-staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Accurate T-staging is pivotal for predicting prognosis and selecting appropriate therapies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for its T-staging is uncertain. We investigated use of FDG PET/CT for preoperative T-staging of patients with ESCC.

METHODS

Patients with ESCC given preoperative FDG PET/CT scans, either with (CRT[+] group) or without (CRT[-] group) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, were retrospectively reviewed. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumors on FDG PET/CT scans were measured, and histopathological results were used as the reference standard. The associations between pathological T-stage and potential factors of age, tumor location, tumor grade, tumor size, and tumor SUVmax were analyzed. The cut-off levels of SUVmax for predicting different T-stages and for residual viable tumors after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were determined using receiver operating characteristic analyses.

RESULTS

We enrolled 103 patients (45 in the CRT[-] group; 58 in the CRT[+] group). SUVmax, an independent predictive factor, positively correlated with the pathological T-stage in both groups (CRT[-] group: ρ = 0.736, p < 0.001; and CRT[+] group: ρ = 0.792, p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of the PET/CT with thresholded SUVmax for predicting the pathological T-stage was 73.3% in the CRT[-] group (SUVmax of T0: 0-1.9, T1: 2.0-4.4, T2: 4.5-6.5, T3: 6.6-13.0, T4: >13.0) and 67.2% in the CRT[+] group (SUVmax of T0: 0-3.4, T1: 3.5-3.9, T2: 4.0-5.5, T3: 5.6-6.2, T4: > 6.2). For CRT[-] group, the accuracy using an SUVmax cut-off of 4.4 to differentiate early (T0-1) from locally advanced disease (T2-4) was 82.2% (95% CI, 71.1-93.4%). For CRT[+] group, the accuracy using an SUVmax cut-off of 3.4 to predict residual viable tumors (non-T0) after completion of chemoradiotherapy was 82.8% (95% CI, 73.0-92.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The FDG avidity of a primary esophageal tumor significantly positively correlated with the pathological T-stage. PET/CT with thresholded SUVmax was useful for predicting T-stage and differentiating residual viable tumors.

Persistent Dysphagia After Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Predicts Poor Post-Operative Outcomes

PURPOSE

Preoperative therapy is frequently employed in the management of esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, many patients are found to have advanced pathologic stage and have poor outcomes. A prognostic factor which identifies this patient population before surgery would be desirable, as alternative treatment strategies may be warranted.

METHODS

Between 2/08 and 1/12, 60 evaluable patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma enrolled in single-arm phase II trial of induction chemotherapy, surgery, and post-operative adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). A clinical stage of T3, N1, or M1a (AJCC 6th) was required for eligibility. Induction chemotherapy with epirubicin 50 mg/m² d1, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² d1, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m²/day continuous infusion for 3 weeks, was given every 21 days for 3 cycles and was followed by surgical resection. Adjuvant CRT consisted of 50-55 Gy @ 1.8-2.0 Gy/day and 2 cycles of cisplatin (20 mg/m²/day) and fluorouracil (1000 mg/m²/day) given as 96-h infusions during weeks 1 and 4 of radiotherapy. Dysphagia was assessed at baseline and after induction chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Persistent dysphagia was associated with worse distant metastatic control [HR 3.48 (1.43-8.43), p = 0.006], recurrence free survival [HR 3.04 (1.34-6.92), p = 0.008], and overall survival [HR 3.31 (1.43-7.66), p = 0.005]. Persistent dysphagia was associated with more advanced pathologic T descriptor (pT) (p = 0.048) and N descriptor (pN) (p = 0.002), a greater median number of involved lymph nodes (3 v 1, p = 0.003), and greater residual tumor viability (p = 0.05). No patients with persistent dysphagia had pT0-T2 or pN0 disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent dysphagia after induction chemotherapy is associated with more advanced pathologic stage and inferior outcomes.

Characterization of residual tumours at the primary site in patients with a near pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

A 'surgery as needed' strategy has been proposed for patients with oesophageal cancer who truly achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). However, the ability to detect residual disease remains problematic. This study investigated the anatomical locations and pathological characteristics of residual cancer in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who achieved a near pCR following nCRT.

METHODS

Patients with oesophageal SCC who achieved a near pCR after nCRT were eligible. Near pCR was defined as residual cancer in the resection specimen representing less than 10 per cent of the apparent original tumour area.

RESULTS

Detailed histopathological reassessment of 76 consecutive patients (mean age 54·4 years) with a near pCR was undertaken. Some 32 patients (42 per cent) with a near pCR had no detectable mucosal lesions. Residual tumour was identified most frequently in the submucosal layer (54, 71 per cent), followed by the mucosa (44, 58 per cent), muscle layer (36, 47 per cent) and adventitia (22, 29 per cent) (P < 0·001). Among patients without ypT1a disease, increasing depth of tumour invasion correlated negatively with the likelihood of mucosal involvement. Of patients with ypT3 disease, 16 of 22 had no detectable cancer located in the mucosa, compared with six of 29 with ypT1b disease (P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

Better tools for predicting pCR are required before considering a 'surgery as needed' approach in the management of oesophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer: anatomic particularities, staging, and imaging techniques

Cancer of the esophagus is a tumor with aggressive behavior that is usually diagnosed in advanced stages. The absence of serosa allows it to spread quickly to neighboring mediastinal structures, and an extensive lymphatic drainage network facilitates tumor spread even in early stages. The current TNM classification, harmonized with the classification for gastric cancer, provides new definitions for the anatomic classification, adds non-anatomic characteristics of the tumor, and includes tumors of the gastroesophageal junction. Combining endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging provides greater accuracy in determining the initial clinical stage, and these imaging techniques play an essential role in the selection, planning, and evaluation of treatment. In this article, we review some particularities that explain the behavior of this tumor and we describe the current TNM staging system; furthermore, we discuss the different imaging tests available for its evaluation and include a diagnostic algorithm.

Endoscopic biopsy and EUS for the detection of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Accurate determination of residual cancer status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer could assist in selecting the optimal treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic biopsy and EUS after nCRT for detecting residual cancer at the primary tumor site (ypT+) and regional lymph nodes (ypN+) as opposed to a pathologic complete response (ypT0 and ypN0).

METHODS

PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched. The analysis included diagnostic studies reporting on the accuracy of endoscopic biopsy or EUS in detecting residual cancer versus complete response after nCRT for esophageal cancer with histopathology as the reference standard. Bivariate random-effects models were used to estimate pooled sensitivities and specificities and examine sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies comprising 12 endoscopic biopsy studies (1281 patients), 11 EUS studies reporting on ypT status (593 patients), and 10 EUS studies reporting on ypN status (602 patients), were included. Pooled estimates for sensitivity of endoscopic biopsy after nCRT for predicting ypT+ were 34.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.0%-44.1%) and for specificity 91.0% (95% CI, 85.6%-94.5%). Pooled estimates for sensitivity of EUS after nCRT were 96.4% (95% CI, 91.7%-98.5%) and for specificity were 10.9% (95% CI, 3.5%-29.0%) for detecting ypT+, and 62.0% (95% CI, 46.0%-75.7%) and 56.7% (95% CI, 41.8%-70.5%) for detecting ypN+, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic biopsy after nCRT is a specific but not sensitive method for detecting residual esophageal cancer. Although EUS after nCRT yields a high sensitivity, only a limited number of patients will have negative findings at EUS with still a substantial false-negative rate. Furthermore, EUS provides only moderate accuracy for detecting residual lymph node involvement. Based on these findings, these endoscopic modalities cannot be used to withhold surgical treatment in test-negative patients after nCRT. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015016527.).

Recent Advances From Basic and Clinical Studies of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most aggressive squamous cell carcinomas and is highly prevalent in Asia. Alcohol and its metabolite, acetaldehyde, are considered definite carcinogens for the esophagus. Polymorphisms in the aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 gene, which encodes an enzyme that eliminates acetaldehyde, have been associated with esophageal carcinogenesis. Studies of the mutagenic and carcinogenic effects of acetaldehyde support this observation. Several recent large-scale comprehensive analyses of the genomic alterations in ESCC have shown a high frequency of mutations in genes such as TP53 and others that regulate the cell cycle or cell differentiation. Moreover, whole genome and whole exome sequencing studies have frequently detected somatic mutations, such as G:C→A:T transitions or G:C→C:G transversions, in ESCC tissues. Genomic instability, caused by abnormalities in the Fanconi anemia DNA repair pathway, is also considered a pathogenic mechanism of ESCC. Advances in diagnostic techniques such as magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging or positron emission tomography have increased the accuracy of diagnosis of ESCC. Updated guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network standardize the practice for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer. Patients with ESCC are treated endoscopically or with surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, based on tumor stage. Minimally invasive treatments help improve the quality of life of patients who undergo such treatments. We review recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of ESCC and advances gained from basic and clinical research.

Different accuracy of endosonographic tumor staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment response to neoadjuvant therapy is histologically associated with more or less intensive inflammation and fibrosis. In consequence, accuracy of endosonographic TN-tumor staging after neoadjuvant treatment is hampered. We analyzed whether the kind of treatment chosen [chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or chemotherapy (CT)] differently influences the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound after neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We performed serial endoscopic ultrasound examinations in 18 patients after neoadjuvant CRT and 30 patients after neoadjuvant CT. TN-stage was classified according to the standard parameter. Histological examination of the surgical resection specimen served as gold standard.

RESULTS

The most frequent error was overstaging, especially in patients with complete tumor response or minimal residual disease. Accuracy of T-staging was significantly worse after CRT (0.16) than after CT (0.43), obviously due to difficulty in distinguishing residual tumor from treatment-associated fibrosis and inflammation. Accuracy of N-staging was also hampered, but to a less extent (sensitivity/specificity 0.85/0.36 after CRT, and 0.5/0.42 after CT).

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy of endosonographic TN-tumor staging is significantly more hampered by neoadjuvant CRT than after CT. However, endoscopic ultrasound is insufficient for TN-staging irrespective of the kind of neoadjuvant therapy performed.

Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment

Patients with advanced esophageal cancer (T3-4, N) have a poor prognosis. Chemoradiation or chemotherapy before esophagectomy with adequate lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for patients with resectable advanced esophageal carcinoma. However, only patients with major histopathologic response (regression to less than 10% of the primary tumor) after preoperative treatment will have a prognostic benefit of preoperative chemoradiation. Using current therapy regimens about 40% to 50% of the patients show major histopathological response. The remaining cohort does not benefit from this neoadjuvant approach but might benefit from earlier surgical resection. Therefore, it is an aim to develop tools for response prediction before starting the treatment and for early response assessment identifying responders. The current review discusses the different imaging techniques and the most recent studies about molecular markers for early response prediction. The results show that [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has a good sensitivity but the specificity is not robust enough for routine clinical use. Newer positron emission tomography detector technology, the combination of FDG-PET with computed tomography, additional evaluation criteria and standardization of evaluation may improve the predictive value. There exist a great number of retrospective studies using molecular markers for prediction of response. Until now the clinical use is missing. But the results of first prospective studies are promising. A future perspective may be the combination of imaging technics and special molecular markers for individualized therapy. Another aspect is the response assessment after finishing neoadjuvant treatment protocol. The different clinical methods are discussed. The results show that until now no non-invasive method is valid enough to assess complete histopathological response.

Factors associated with false-negative endoscopic biopsy results after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The usefulness of endoscopic biopsy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is limited because of its high false-negative (FN) rates. However, data on the factors associated with FN biopsy results remain scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors associated with FN results on endoscopic biopsies in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) following nCRT. We retrospectively reviewed the records of ESCC patients who were treated at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, between 1999 and 2013. Inclusion criteria were receiving nCRT as first-line treatment before esophagectomy and having been preoperatively submitted to an endoscopic biopsy. Endoscopic findings at the lesion site were classified into 6 distinct categories: stricture, tumor, ulcer, scar, other findings, or normal. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with FN biopsy findings. A total of 227 patients were selected, of which 92 (41.9%) had positive biopsy results. Among patients with negative biopsy findings (n = 135), 85 were found to have residual cancer on the resected esophagus. Multivariate analysis identified endoscopic findings as the only independent predictor of FN biopsy results. The negative predictive values were 77.8%, 61.9%, 52.6%, 30.3%, 23.1%, and 20.0% for the normal, scar, other findings, ulcer, stricture, and tumor categories, respectively (P < 0.001). In ESCC patients, the FN rate of endoscopic biopsy after nCRT is associated with the type of residual lesion.

Staging accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the staging of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Articles were searched in Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews, Google scholar, and EMBASE. Two reviewers independently searched and extracted data. Meta-analysis of the accuracy of EUS was analyzed by calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Pooling was conducted using either fixed-effects model or random-effects model depending on the heterogeneity across studies. Sixteen studies (n = 724) were included in this analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS to diagnose T1 stage tumor was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16-32%) and 95% (95%CI 93-97%), respectively. For T2 stage, EUS had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 29% (95%CI 19-41%) and 84% (95%CI 77-88%). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS were 81% (95%CI 72-88%) and 42% (95%CI 33-52%) in determining T3 stage tumor. To diagnose T4 stage tumor, EUS had a pooled sensitivity of 43% (95%CI 31-56%) and specificity of 96% (95%CI 94-97%), respectively. In determining N stage, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS were 69% (95%CI 58-79%) and 52% (95%CI 42-62%). EUS is a moderately accurate technique in staging esophageal cancer after NAC. Its sensitivity is relatively high in T3 while specificity is high in other T stages (T1, T2, and T4). Tumors restaged by EUS as T4 should not be assigned to surgery because it is very likely to be inoperable. EUS is not reliable for N staging with its poor sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup analysis shows that staging accuracy did not improve with time.

Esophageal cancer: A Review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, staging workup and treatment modalities

Esophageal cancer is a serious malignancy with regards to mortality and prognosis. It is a growing health concern that is expected to increase in incidence over the next 10 years. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histological type of esophageal cancer worldwide, with a higher incidence in developing nations. With the increased prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity in developed nations, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has dramatically increased in the past 40 years. Esophageal cancer is staged according to the widely accepted TNM system. Staging plays an integral part in guiding stage specific treatment protocols and has a great impact on overall survival. Common imaging modalities used in staging include computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound and positron emission tomography scans. Current treatment options include multimodality therapy mainstays of current treatment include surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Tumor markers of esophageal cancer are an advancing area of research that could potentially lead to earlier diagnosis as well as playing a part in assessing tumor response to therapy.

Comparison of survival among neoadjuvant chemoradiation responders, non-responders and patients receiving primary resection for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: does neoadjuvant chemoradiation benefit all?

OBJECTIVES

While neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery has been shown to improve the survival of patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer, it is not known whether neoadjuvant chemoradiation has a beneficial or harmful effect on the non-responders. We aimed to compare the outcomes among neoadjuvant chemoradiation responders, non-responders and patients receiving primary oesophagectomies for resectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Eighty-four non-T1-2N0 oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients were included. Thirty-eight patients received primary resection and 46 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The overall survival of chemoradiation responders (<50% residual tumour), non-responders (>50% residual tumour and those who shifted to definitive chemoradiation instead of surgery due to tumour progression) and patients receiving primary resection were compared. Clinical parameters were also compared between responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

There was no overall difference in survival between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and primary resection groups (2-year overall survival rates: 45.6 vs 54.3%, P = 0.442). In patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, pathological responders had significantly higher 2-year overall survival rates than non-responders (64.5 vs 38.9%, P = 0.043). While the pathological responders had the highest survival rate, clinicopathological non-responders (pathological non-responders and patients with tumour progression during the neoadjuvant chemoradiation period) demonstrated significantly worse outcomes than those receiving primary resection (32.0 vs 54.3%, P = 0.036). However, none of the clinical parameters, including blood profiles, images and baseline tumour characteristics, predicted the response to chemoradiation before treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation non-responders demonstrated no benefit and an even worse outcome compared with those receiving primary resection for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, no significant clinical parameters could be implemented in the clinics to predict the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation before treatment.

Endoscopic ultrasound in staging esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results of a multicenter cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered a gold standard in the initial staging of esophageal cancer. There is an ongoing debate whether EUS is useful for tumor staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Ninety-five patients with esophageal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. In 45 patients, EUS was performed prior to and after NAC, while 50 patients had no induction therapy. Histological correlation through surgery was available. uT/uN classifications were compared to pT/pN stages. Statistical analysis included calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates. Agreement between endosonography and T staging was assessed with Cohen's kappa statistics.

RESULTS

For those patients with prior NAC, overall accuracy of yuT and yuN classification was 29 and 62%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates for local tumor extension after NAC were as follows (%): T1: -/97/84, T2: 13/76/53, T3:86/29/46, T4:20/100/91, T1/2: 27/83/56, T3/4: 89/31/56. Cohen's kappa indicated poor agreement (kappa = 0.129) between yuT classification and ypT stage. Relative to positive lymph node detection, sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 6%, respectively (kappa = 0.06). T stage was overstaged in 23 (51%) and understaged in seven (16%) patients.

CONCLUSION

EUS is an unreliable tool for staging esophageal cancer after NAC. Overstaging of the T stage is common after NAC.

Accuracy of multidetector-row CT for restaging after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with oesophageal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector CT (MDCT) for restaging of patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Results of pathological staging were correlated with those from 64-MDCT before and after neoadjuvant treatment in 35 patients using the American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM classification (7th edition). CT response was determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) method, modified for one-dimensional tumour diameter measurement.

RESULTS

64-MDCT predicted T stage correctly in 34 % (12/35), overstaged in 49 % (17/35) and understaged in 17 % (6/35). Sensitivity/specificity values were as follows: T0, 20 %/92 %; T1-T2, 31 %/59 %; T3, 60 %/64 %; T4, 100 %/4 %. Negative predictive values for T3/T4 were 80 %/100 %. MDCT accurately predicted complete histopathological response in 20 % (accuracy 74 %) and overstaged in 80 %. Tumour regression grade was predicted correctly in only 8 % (2/25) and underestimated in 68 % (17/25). Accurate N stage was noted in 69 % (24/35).

CONCLUSION

Although MDCT tends to be able to exclude advanced tumour stages (T3, T4) with a higher likelihood, the diagnostic accuracy of high resolution MDCT for restaging oesophageal cancer and assessing the response to neoadjuvant therapy has not improved in comparison to older-generation CT. Therefore, the future assessment of oesophageal tumour response should focus on combined morphologic and metabolic imaging.

KEY POINTS

• Multidetector CT (MDCT) has been beneficial for the evaluation of many tumours. • However diagnostic accuracy for restaging oesophageal cancer has not improved with MDCT. • MDCT tends to be able to exclude advanced tumour stages (T3/T4). • MDCT has a low accuracy for determining lymph node metastasis. • Oesophageal tumour response should be assessed by combined morphological and metabolic imaging.

The new era of staging as a key for an appropriate treatment for esophageal cancer

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT) have become the gold standard for staging of esophageal cancer by detecting distant metastases, but metastatic lymph nodes are often difficult to diagnose from the size and standardized uptake value (SUV). If we compare the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), CT, and FDG-PET in staging of esophageal cancer, EUS is the most sensitive method to identify the detection of regional lymph node metastases, whereas CT and FDG-PET are more specific tests. Combination study with CT, EUS and PETCT cannot make a precise diagnosis after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). A precise staging might be determined by the fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) under EUS and US screening in the neck and the abdomen even after NAT. Indication of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial cancer is sensitive because of difficulty in T1b cancer diagnosis. Detailed examination about vessel invasion and the possibility of residual tumor with dissected specimen will offer an appropriate additional therapy. New strategy like sentinel lymph node (SLN) navigation could supply more information about lymphatic routes and metastatic nodes. SLN navigation with ESD might become a new less invasive strategy for superficial esophageal cancer.

Multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer

This article reviews the current management of esophageal cancer, including staging and treatment options, as well as providing support for using multidisciplinary teams to better manage esophageal cancer patients.