Laparoscopic ultrasound-assisted liposuction for lymph node dissection: a pilot study

Comparison of single-pore non-liposuction near-infrared laparoscopy with conventional open surgery for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early breast cancer: a single-center, small-sample retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effects of single-pore non-liposuction near-infrared (NIR) endoscopic surgery and traditional open surgery for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with early breast cancer (EBC).

METHODS

The clinical pathological data of 61 patients with EBC who underwent axillary SLNB using indocyanine green (ICG) combined with carbon nanoparticle suspension (CNS) were retrospectively collected. Thirty patients received SLNB through single-pore non-liposuction NIR endoscopic surgery (endoscopic group), and the remaining 31 received SLNB through open-incision surgery (open group). The success rate, operation time, volume of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative axillary drainage, axillary extubation time, and the occurrence of postoperative complications were compared between the groups along with the total number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), luminous SLNs, stained SLNs, and the pathological positivity rate of the SLNs.

RESULTS

All patients underwent SLNB with a 100% success rate. SLNB operation times of the endoscopic group were longer than those of the open group (t = 3.963, P = 0.000), and the volume of axillary drainage was inferior (t = 3.035, P = 0.004). However, there were no differences in the intraoperative bleeding volumes, axillary extubation times, and postoperative complications (P > 0.05). In the Open group, the mean number of SLNs was 5.12 ± 2.16, and the pathological positivity rate was 13.53%; in the Endoscopic group, these numbers were 4.89 ± 1.73 and 12.39%. The mean number of SLNs detected (t = 0.458, P = 0.649) and the pathological positivity rates (χ2 = 0.058, P = 0.810) did not differ between the two groups. All 61 patients were followed for a median of 14.6 months. There were no local recurrences or distant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-center results reveal that single-hole non-liposuction NIR endoscopic axillary SLNB is not inferior to open SLNB and may be an appropriate option for patients with early breast cancer who desire breast preservation with fewer incisions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This retrospective study was "retrospectively registered" at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology (no. 2020105) and in National Medical Research Registration and Archival Information System ( https://www.medicalresearch.org.cn , number: MR-44-21-004727).

Proposal for a novel elliptical ultrasonic aspirator and its fundamental performance in cartilage removal

An ultrasonic aspirator with elliptical vibration on the end face is presented in this paper. The ultrasonic vibration relied on a specially designed Langevin transducer. The end face of the transducer was screwed into a surgical tool capable of changing amplitude, which requires resonance to provide sufficient vibration amplitude for cutting cartilage or other biological tissues. Based on the coupling of two vertical bending vibrations, the new design produced the elliptical ultrasonic vibration on the end face of the surgical tool, which differed from the axial vibration of a traditional ultrasonic aspirator. The design greatly increased the mechanical effect of the aspirator. A specially designed blade was employed to remove the cartilage tissue. A prototype device was designed to operate at 20 kHz with a displacement amplitude of 150 μm at 200 V. The measurements of the vibrational and impedance responses showed the mechanical and electrical characteristics of the aspirator. Cutting tests on mice costal cartilage were subsequently conducted. Histological analysis displayed a higher proportion of live cells in the region around the cut site, which exhibited a higher removal efficiency.

Functional and Therapeutic Indications of Liposuction: Personal Experience and Review of the Literature

Liposuction is the most common cosmetic surgical procedure worldwide. It has evolved from being designed primarily for body contouring to becoming essential adjunct to various other aesthetic procedures, greatly enhancing their outcome. Despite its hard clear differentiation between an aesthetic and therapeutic indication for some pathologic conditions, liposuction has been increasingly applied to a gamut of disorders as a therapeutic tool or to improve function. In fact, liposuction has ceased to define a specific procedure and became synonymous to a surgical technique or tool same as the surgical knife, laser, electrocautery, suture material, or even wound-dressing products. At present, there seems to be an enormous potential for the application of the basic liposuction technique in ablative and reconstructive surgery outside the realm of purely aesthetic procedures. The present review contemplates the various nonaesthetic applications of liposuction, displaying the enormous potentials of what should be considered a basic surgical technique rather than a specific aesthetic procedure. Implications of this new definition of liposuction should induce third-party public payers and insurance companies to reconsider their remuneration and reimbursement policies.