1
|
Meng W, Ya-di H, Wei-bo C, Ru-dong Z, Ze-wei C, Ou Yang J, Ze-peng Y, Chuan-qi C, Yi-ze L, Dan-ping S, Wen-bin Y. Clinical effect and follow-up of laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy for upper gastric carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1167177. [PMID: 37064085 PMCID: PMC10090458 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1167177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and clinical effect of tubular esophagogastric anastomosis in laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted involving 191 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2017 to October 2020. Patients were divided into tubular esophagogastric anastomosis group (TG group) and traditional esophagogastric anastomosis group (EG group) according to the digestive tract reconstruction. Their intraoperative conditions, perioperative recovery and postoperative follow-up were compared. Patients were also divided into indocyanine green group and non-indocyanine green group according to whether or not indocyanine green tracer technology was used during the operation. Their intraoperative condition and perioperative recovery were compared and analyzed after propensity score matching.ResultsThe operation was successfully completed in all patients. Compared with the EG group, the TG group had less volume of gastric tube drainage, shorter gastric tube drainage time and proton pump inhibitors application time, and lower reuse rate of proton pump inhibitors. However, the TG group had a higher anastomotic stenosis at three months after surgery, as measured using anastomotic width and dysphagia score. Nevertheless, the incidence of reflux esophagitis and postoperative quality of life score in the TG group were lower compared with the EG group at 1st and 2nd year after surgery. In the indocyanine green analysis, the indocyanine green group had significantly shorter total operation time and lymph node dissection time and less intraoperative blood loss compared with the non-indocyanine green group. However, compared with the non-indocyanine green group, more postoperative lymph nodes were obtained in the indocyanine green group.ConclusionLaparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy is safe and effective treatment option for upper gastric cancer. Tubular esophagogastric anastomosis has more advantages in restoring postoperative gastrointestinal function and reducing reflux, but it has a higher incidence of postoperative anastomotic stenosis compared with traditional esophagogastrostomy. The application of indocyanine green tracer technique in laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy has positive significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Meng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Huang Ya-di
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Cao Wei-bo
- Department of General Surgery, Weihai Second Hospital, Weihai, China
| | - Zhao Ru-dong
- Department of General Surgery, Yangxin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yangxin, China
| | - Cheng Ze-wei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jun Ou Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yan Ze-peng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Chen Chuan-qi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Liang Yi-ze
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Sun Dan-ping
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yu Wen-bin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
- *Correspondence: Yu Wen-bin,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Are intra-operative gastric drainage procedures necessary in esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:3287-3295. [PMID: 36163378 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02685-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgical pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy are often performed during esophagectomy with a view of improving gastric conduit drainage. However, the clinical importance of this is not clear, and some centers opt to omit this step. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the rates of pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak, mortality, delayed gastric emptying, and the need for further pyloric intervention, in patients undergoing esophagectomy with and without a drainage procedure. METHODS A database search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed to identify randomized control trials and cohort studies published between 2000 and 2020 which compared outcomes of esophagectomy with and without drainage procedures. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to compare the rates of pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak, mortality, delayed gastric emptying, and the need for further pyloric intervention. RESULTS Three randomized and 12 non-randomized publications were identified, comprising a total of 2339 patients. No significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to pulmonary complications (RR 1.02 [95% CI, 0.78-1.33], p = 0.91), anastomotic leak (RR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.80-1.62], p = 0.48), mortality (RR 0.53 [95% CI, 0.23-1.26], p = 0.15), delayed gastric emptying (RR 0.98 [95% CI, 0.59-1.62], p = 0.93), and the need for further pyloric intervention (RR 1.99 [95% CI, 0.56-7.08], p = 0.29). CONCLUSION Where post-operative pyloric treatment is available on demand, surgical pyloric drainage procedures may not have any significant clinical impact on patient outcomes for patients undergoing esophagectomy, though further good-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ongoing Controversies in Esophageal Cancer I. Thorac Surg Clin 2022; 32:541-551. [DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
4
|
Abdelrahman M, Ariyarathenam A, Berrisford R, Humphreys L, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Chan DSY. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of prophylactic pyloric balloon dilatation in the prevention of early delayed gastric emptying after oesophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6363055. [PMID: 34476470 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early delayed gastric emptying (DGE) occurs in up to 50% of patients following oesophagectomy, which can contribute to increased anastomotic leak and respiratory infection rates. Although the treatment of DGE in the form of pyloric balloon dilatation (PBD) post-operatively is well established, there is no consensus on the optimal approach in the prevention of DGE. The aim of this review was to determine the efficacy of prophylactic PBD in the prevention of DGE following oesophagectomy. METHOD PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (January 1990 to April 2021) were searched for studies reporting the outcomes of prophylactic PBD in patients who underwent oesophagectomy. The primary outcome measure was the rate of DGE. Secondary outcome measures include anastomotic leak rate and length of hospital stay. RESULTS Three studies with a total of 203 patients [mean age 63 (26-82) years, 162 males (79.8%)] were analyzed. PBD with a 20-mm balloon was performed in 165 patients (46 patients had PBD and botox therapy) compared with 38 patients who had either no intervention or botox alone (14 patients). The pooled rates of early DGE [16.27%, 95% CI (12.29-20.24) vs. 39.02% (38.87-39.17) (P < 0.001)] and anastomotic leak [8.55%, 95% CI (8.51-8.59) vs. 12.23% (12.16-12.31), P < 0.001] were significantly lower in the PBD group. CONCLUSION Prophylactic PBD with a 20-mm balloon significantly reduced the rates of early delayed gastric emptying and anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lee Humphreys
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - Grant Sanders
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - Tim Wheatley
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - David S Y Chan
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tham JC, Pournaras DJ, Alcocer B, Forbes R, Ariyarathenam AV, Humphreys ML, Berrisford RG, Wheatley TJ, Chan D, Sanders G, Lewis SJ. Gut hormones profile after an Ivor Lewis gastro-esophagectomy and its relationship to delayed gastric emptying. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6544855. [PMID: 35265988 PMCID: PMC9742676 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is common after an Ivor Lewis gastro-esophagectomy (ILGO). The risk of a dilated conduit is the much-feared anastomotic leak. Therefore, prompt management of DGE is required. However, the pathophysiology of DGE is unclear. We proposed that post-ILGO patients with/without DGE have different gut hormone profiles (GHP). Consecutive patients undergoing an ILGO from 1 December 2017 to 31 November 2019 were recruited. Blood sampling was conducted on either day 4, 5, or 6 with baseline sample taken prior to a 193-kcal meal and after every 30 minutes for 2 hours. If patients received pyloric dilatation, a repeat profile was performed post-dilatation and were designated as had DGE. Analyses were conducted on the following groups: patient without dilatation (non-dilated) versus dilatation (dilated); and pre-dilatation versus post-dilatation. Gut hormone profiles analyzed were glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY) using radioimmunoassay. Of 65 patients, 24 (36.9%) had dilatation and 41 (63.1%) did not. For the non-dilated and dilated groups, there were no differences in day 4, 5, or 6 GLP-1 (P = 0.499) (95% confidence interval for non-dilated [2822.64, 4416.40] and dilated [2519.91, 3162.32]). However, PYY levels were raised in the non-dilated group (P = 0.021) (95% confidence interval for non-dilated [1620.38, 3005.75] and dilated [821.53, 1606.18]). Additionally, after pyloric dilatation, paired analysis showed no differences in GLP-1, but PYY levels were different at all time points and had an exaggerated post-prandial response. We conclude that DGE is associated with an obtunded PYY response. However, the exact nature of the association is not yet established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Chung Tham
- Address correspondence to: Mr Ji Chung Tham MBChB, MSc, FRCS, C/O Mr Grant Sanders, Level 7, Peninsula Oesophago-Gastric Centre, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK. Tel: +44(0)1752430011; Fax: +44(0)1752517576;
| | - Dimitri J Pournaras
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Bruno Alcocer
- Peninsula Oesophago-Gastric Centre, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Rosie Forbes
- Peninsula Oesophago-Gastric Centre, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Martyn L Humphreys
- Peninsula Oesophago-Gastric Centre, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Tim J Wheatley
- Peninsula Oesophago-Gastric Centre, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - David Chan
- Peninsula Oesophago-Gastric Centre, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Grant Sanders
- Peninsula Oesophago-Gastric Centre, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mertens A, Gooszen J, Fockens P, Voermans R, Gisbertz S, Bredenoord A, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Treating Early Delayed Gastric Tube Emptying after Esophagectomy with Pneumatic Pyloric Dilation. Dig Surg 2022; 38:337-342. [PMID: 34727541 PMCID: PMC8820434 DOI: 10.1159/000519785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic pneumatic pyloric balloon dilation is a treatment option for early postoperative delayed gastric tube emptying following esophageal resection. This study aimed to determine the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic balloon dilation. METHODS Between 2015 and 2018, patients with delayed gastric emptying 8-10 days after esophageal resection with gastric tube reconstruction due to esophageal carcinoma were considered for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were ≥1 of the following: nasogastric tube production ≥500 mL/24 h, ≥300 mL gastric retention, ≥50% gastric tube dilatation on X-ray, or nasogastric tube replacement. Patients were excluded on evidence of anastomotic leakage or reintervention. Success was defined as the ability to expand intake without needing to replace the nasogastric tube. Dilation was performed using a 30-mm Rigiflex balloon. RESULTS Fifteen patients underwent pyloric dilation, 12 according to the study protocol. Treatment was performed at a median of 12 days (IQR 9-15) postoperatively. Success was achieved in 58%. At 3 months, 8 patients progressed to exclusively oral intake. The remaining 4 patients had supplementary nightly enteral tube feeding. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSION Endoscopic balloon dilation of the pylorus is a safe, feasible therapy for early postoperative delayed gastric emptying. With a success rate of 58%, a clinical trial is a necessary next step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Mertens
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands,*Alexander Mertens,
| | - Jan Gooszen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier Voermans
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Ivo van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,**Mark Ivo Van Berge Henegouwen,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Endoscopic pyloromyotomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a novel approach. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2341-2348. [PMID: 33948713 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08511-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pyloric drainage procedures, namely pyloromyotomy or pyloroplasty, have long been considered an integral aspect of esophagectomy. However, the requirement of pyloric drainage in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been brought into question. This is in part because of the technical challenges of performing the pyloric drainage laparoscopically, leading many surgical teams to explore other options or to abandon this procedure entirely. We have developed a novel, technically facile, endoscopic approach to pyloromyotomy, and sought to assess the efficacy of this new approach compared to the standard surgical pyloromyotomy. METHODS Patients who underwent MIE for cancer from 01/2010 to 12/2019 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database and were divided into two groups according to the pyloric drainage procedure: endoscopic or surgical pyloric drainage. 30-day outcomes (complications, length of stay, readmissions) and pyloric drainage-related outcomes [conduit distension/width, nasogastric tube (NGT) duration and re-insertion, gastric stasis] were compared between groups. RESULTS 94 patients were identified of these 52 patients underwent endoscopic PM and 42 patients underwent surgical PM. The groups were similar with respect to age, gender and comorbidities. There were more Ivor-Lewis esophagectomies in the endoscopic PM group than the surgical PM group [45 (86%), 15 (36%) p < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications and readmissions. Gastric stasis requiring NGT re-insertion was rare in the endoscopic PM group and did not differ significantly from the surgical PM group (1.9-4.7% p = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic pyloromyotomy using a novel approach is a safe, quick and reproducible technique with comparable results to a surgical PM in the setting of MIE.
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang HC, Choi JH, Kim MS, Lee JM. Delayed Gastric Emptying after Esophagectomy: Management and Prevention. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2020; 53:226-232. [PMID: 32793457 PMCID: PMC7409889 DOI: 10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.4.226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The quality of life associated with eating is becoming an increasingly significant problem for patients who undergo esophagectomy as a result of the improved survival rate after esophageal cancer surgery. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication after esophagectomy. Although several strategies have been proposed for the management and prevention of DGE, no clear consensus exists. The purpose of this review is to present a brief overview of DGE and to help clinicians choose the most appropriate treatment through an analysis of DGE by cause. Furthermore, we would like to suggest some tips to prevent DGE based on our experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Chul Yang
- Center for Lung Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jin Ho Choi
- Center for Lung Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Moon Soo Kim
- Center for Lung Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jong Mog Lee
- Center for Lung Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nevins EJ, Rao R, Nicholson J, Murphy KD, Moore A, Smart HL, Stephens N, Grocock C, Kaul A, Gunasekera RT, Hartley MN, Howes NR. Endoscopic Botulinum toxin as a treatment for delayed gastric emptying following oesophagogastrectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2020; 102:693-696. [PMID: 32538118 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) following oesophagogastrectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction is reported to be between 1.7% and 50%. This variation is due to differing practices of intraoperative pylorus drainage procedures, which increase the risk of postoperative biliary reflux and dumping syndrome, resulting in significant morbidity. The aim of our study was to establish rates of DGE in people undergoing oesophagogastrectomy without routine intraoperative drainage procedures, and to evaluate outcomes of postoperative endoscopically administered Botulinum toxin into the pylorus (EBP) for people with DGE resistant to systemic pharmacological treatment. METHODS All patients undergoing oesophagogastrectomy between 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2018 at our unit were included. No intraoperative pyloric drainage procedures were performed, and DGE resistant to systemic pharmacotherapy was managed with EBP. RESULTS Ninety-seven patients were included. Postoperatively, 29 patients (30%) were diagnosed with DGE resistant to pharmacotherapy. Of these, 16 (16.5%) were diagnosed within 30 days of surgery. The median pre-procedure nasogastric tube aspirate was 780ml; following EBP, this fell to 125ml (p<0.001). Median delay from surgery to EBP in this cohort was 13 days (IQR 7-16 days). Six patients required a second course of EBP, with 100% successful resolution of DGE before discharge. There were no procedural complications. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest series of patients without routine intraoperative drainage procedures. Only 30% of patients developed DGE resistant to pharmacotherapy, which was managed safely with EBP in the postoperative period, thus minimising the risk of biliary reflux in people who would otherwise be at risk following prophylactic pylorus drainage procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Nevins
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - R Rao
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - J Nicholson
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - K D Murphy
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - A Moore
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - H L Smart
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - N Stephens
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - C Grocock
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - A Kaul
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - R T Gunasekera
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - M N Hartley
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - N R Howes
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hadzijusufovic E, Tagkalos E, Neumann H, Babic B, Heinrich S, Lang H, Grimminger PP. Preoperative endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation decreases the rate of delayed gastric emptying after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32:5223194. [PMID: 30508077 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Revised: 08/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy occurs postoperatively in up to 50% of the patients. This pyloric dysfunction can lead to severe secondary complications postoperatively such as early aspiration, pneumonia or may even have an impact on anastomotic healing and therefore leakage. Early detection of DGE is essential to prevent further complications. The common treatment postoperatively is endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation (EPBD) after symptoms already occurred. In our work, we analyzed patients who received a preoperative EPBD during the routine restaging endoscopy and compared those patients to a control group to analyze if preoperative EPBD may prevent postoperative DGE and secondary additional complications. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 115 patients who received an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy by the same surgeon between June 2015 and October 2017. Out of these 115 patients, 91 (79.1%) patients received EPBD preoperatively during the staging/restaging endoscopy (PDG, pyloric dilatation group). In 24 (20.9%) patients, preoperative EPBD was not performed due to stenotic esophageal tumors or logistic reasons (NDG, non-pyloric dilatation group). Data of the PDG and NDG group were compared regarding the rate of postoperative DGE as well as DGE and EPBD related complications. In total, 21 (18.3%) patients developed pyloric dysfunction requiring a total of 27 EPBD during follow-up. There were 12 (13.2%) patients in the PDG and 9 (37.5%) patients in the NDG (p = 0.014), respectively. DGE-related complications such as anastomotic leaks (p = 0.466), pulmonary complications (p = 0.466) and longer median hospital stay (p = 0.685) were more frequent in the NDG group; however this difference did not reach statistical significance. The success rate for postoperative EPBD with 20-mm balloons was lower (58.5%) compared to the usage of 30-mm balloons (93.3%). All pre- and postoperative EPBD were performed without any complications. Preoperative EPBD is feasible, safe and can be combined with restating endoscopy. It seems that preoperative EPBD reduces the incidence of DGE and can prevent the need for early postoperative endoscopic interventions. Our recommendation is therefore to perform an EPBD preoperatively when possible to reduce postoperative complications to a minimum. For postoperative EPBD, we recommend the use of the 30-mm balloon due to lower redilatation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Hadzijusufovic
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - E Tagkalos
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - H Neumann
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - B Babic
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - S Heinrich
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - H Lang
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - P P Grimminger
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
With increasing survival after esophagectomy for cancer, a growing number of individuals living with the functional results of a surgically altered anatomy calls for attention to the effects of delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) on health-related quality of life and nutritional impairment. We here give an overview of the currently available literature on DGCE, in terms of epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostics, prevention and treatment. Attention is given to controversies in the current literature and obstacles related to general applicability of study results, as well as knowledge gaps that may be the focus for future research initiatives. Finally, we propose that measures are taken to reach international expert agreement regarding diagnostic criteria and a symptom grading tool for DGCE, and that functional radiological methods are established for the diagnosis and severity grading of DGCE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus Konradsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC) and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC) and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGE) is a common complication after esophagectomy. Currently, pyloric interventions are the major prevention and treatment for DGE. In this review, we attempt to evaluate the clinical effect and safety of different pyloric interventions in esophagectomy patients. Moreover, other important management of DGE, including size of esophageal substitute, erythromycin and nasogastric tube (NGT) will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rusi Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510080, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.,Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Lanjun Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510080, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marchese S, Qureshi YA, Hafiz SP, Dawas K, Turner P, Mughal MM, Mohammadi B. Intraoperative Pyloric Interventions during Oesophagectomy: a Multicentre Study. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:1319-1324. [PMID: 29667092 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3759-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Denervation of the pylorus after oesophagectomy is considered the principal factor responsible for delayed gastric emptying. Several studies have attempted to delineate whether surgical or chemical management of the pylorus during oesophagectomy is of benefit, but with conflicting results. The aim of this multicentre study was to assess whether there was any difference in outcomes between different approaches to management of the pylorus. METHODS A prospectively maintained database was used to identify patients who underwent oesophagectomy for malignancy. They were divided into separate cohorts based on the specific pyloric intervention: intra-pyloric botulinum toxin injection, pyloroplasty and no pyloric treatment. Main outcome parameters were naso-gastric tube duration and re-siting, endoscopic pyloric intervention after surgery both as in- and outpatient, length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality and delayed gastric emptying symptoms at first clinic appointment. RESULTS Ninety patients were included in this study, 30 in each group. The duration of post-operative naso-gastric tube placement demonstrated significance between the groups (p = 0.001), being longer for patients receiving botulinum treatment. The requirement for endoscopic pyloric treatment after surgery was again poorer for those receiving botulinum (p = 0.032 and 0.003 for inpatient and outpatient endoscopy, respectively). CONCLUSION We did not find evidence of superiority of surgical treatment or botulinum toxin of the pylorus, as prophylactic treatment for potential delayed gastric emptying after oesophagectomy, compared to no treatment at all. Based on our findings, no treatment of the pylorus yielded the most favourable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Marchese
- Department of Oesophago-Gastric Surgery, University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Yassar A Qureshi
- Department of Oesophago-Gastric Surgery, University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Shazia P Hafiz
- Upper Gastrointestinal Service, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - Khaled Dawas
- Department of Oesophago-Gastric Surgery, University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Paul Turner
- Upper Gastrointestinal Service, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - M Muntzer Mughal
- Department of Oesophago-Gastric Surgery, University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Borzoueh Mohammadi
- Department of Oesophago-Gastric Surgery, University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gastric Outlet Obstruction After Esophagectomy: Retrospective Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Postoperative Endoscopic Pyloric Dilatation. World J Surg 2017; 40:2405-11. [PMID: 27216809 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3575-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy with gastric replacement can pose a significant postoperative problem, often leading to aspiration and pneumonia. The present study analyzes retrospectively the effectiveness of endoscopic pyloric dilatation for post-surgical gastric outlet obstruction. METHODS Between March 2006 and March 2010, 403 patients underwent a transthoracic en-bloc esophagectomy and reconstruction with a gastric tube and intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy. In patients with postoperative symptoms of an outlet dysfunction and the confirmation by endoscopy, pyloric dilatations were performed without preference with either 20- or 30-mm balloons. RESULTS A total of 89 balloon dilatations of the pylorus after esophagectomy were performed in 60 (15.6 %) patients. In 21 (35 %) patients, a second dilatation of the pylorus was performed. 55 (61.8 %) dilatations were performed with a 30-mm balloon and 34 (38.2 %) with a 20-mm balloon. The total redilatation rate for the 30-mm balloon was 20 % (n = 11) and 52.9 % (n = 18) for the 20-mm balloon (p < 0.001). All dilatations were performed without any complications. CONCLUSIONS Pylorus spasm contributes to delayed gastric emptying leading to postoperative complications after esophagectomy. Endoscopic pyloric dilatation after esophagectomy is a safe procedure for treatment of gastric outlet obstruction. The use of a 30-mm balloon has the same safety profile but a 2.5 lower redilatation rate compared to the 20-mm balloon. Thus, the use of 20-mm balloons has been abandoned in our clinic.
Collapse
|
15
|
Fabian T, Federico JA. The Impact of Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2017; 97:763-770. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
16
|
Risk factors for delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 402:547-554. [PMID: 28324171 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1576-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common functional disorder after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. Little is known about risk factors that can predict this debilitating complication. METHODS Patients who underwent elective esophagectomy from 2008 to 2016 in a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnosis of DGE was based on clinical, radiological, and endoscopic findings. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient-, tumor-, and procedure-related factors that increase the risk of DGE. RESULTS One hundred eighty-two patients were included. Incidence of DGE was 39.0%. Overall, 27 (14.8%) needed an endoscopic intervention. Patients in the DGE group had a longer hospital stay (p < 0.01). No differences were found for the 30-day (p = 1.0) and hospital mortality (p = 1.0). On univariate analyses, a significant influence on DGE was demonstrated for pre-existing pulmonary comorbidity (p = 0.04), an anastomotic leak (p < 0.01), and postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia: p = 0.02, pleural empyema: p < 0.01, and adult respiratory distress syndrome: p = 0.03). Furthermore, there was a non-significant trend toward an increased risk for DGE for the following variable: female gender (p = 0.09) and longer operative time (p = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, only female gender (p = 0.03) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with an increased risk for DGE. CONCLUSIONS DGE is a frequent complication following esophagectomy that can successfully be managed with conservative or endoscopic measures. DGE did not increase mortality but was associated with increased morbidity and prolonged hospitalization. We identified risk factors that increase the incidence of DGE. However, this has to be confirmed in future studies with standardized definition of DGE.
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang L, Hou SC, Miao JB, Lee H. Risk factors for delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing esophagectomy without pyloric drainage. J Surg Res 2017; 213:46-50. [PMID: 28601331 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 01/18/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after esophagectomy is 10%-50%, which can interfere with postoperative recovery in the short-term and result in poor quality of life in the long term. Pyloric drainage is routinely performed to prevent DGE, but its role is highly controversial. The aim of this study was to report the rate of DGE after esophagectomy without pyloric drainage and to investigate its risk factors and the potential effect on recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 2010 and January 2015, we analyzed 285 consecutive patients who received an esophagectomy without pyloric drainage. Possible correlations between the incidence of DGE and its potential risk factors were examined in univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. The outcomes of DGE were reviewed with a follow-up of 3 mo. RESULTS The overall rate of DGE after esophagectomy was 18.2% (52/285). Among perioperative factors, gastric size (gastric tube versus the whole stomach) was the only significant factor affecting the incidence of DGE in the univariate analysis. The patients who received a whole stomach as an esophageal substitute were more likely to develop DGE than were patients with a gastric tube (13.2% versus 22.4%; P = 0.05). No independent risk factor for DGE was found in the multivariate analysis. The incidence of major postoperative complications, including anastomotic leak, respiratory complications, and cardiac complications, was also not significantly different between both groups, with or without DGE. Within 3 mo of follow-up, most patients could effectively manage their DGE through medication (39/52) or endoscopic pyloric dilation (12/52), with only one patient requiring surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS In our study, the overall incidence of DGE is about 20% for patients undergoing esophagectomy without pyloric drainage. Compared with prior findings, this does not result in a significantly increased incidence of DGE. In patients with symptoms of DGE after esophagectomy, prokinetic agents and endoscopic balloon dilation of the pylorus can be effective, as indicated by the high success rate and lack of significant complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Sheng-Cai Hou
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jin-Bai Miao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Lee
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chao HC. Update on endoscopic management of gastric outlet obstruction in children. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8:635-645. [PMID: 27803770 PMCID: PMC5067470 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i18.635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2016] [Revised: 06/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) and surgical intervention are two most common and effective treatments for gastric outlet obstruction. Correction of gastric outlet obstruction without the need for surgery is an issue that has been tried to be resolved in these decades; this management has developed with EBD, advanced treatments like local steroid injection, electrocauterization, and stent have been added recently. The most common causes of pediatric gastric outlet obstruction are idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, peptic ulcer disease followed by the ingestion of caustic substances, stenosis secondary to surgical anastomosis; antral web, duplication cyst, ectopic pancreas, and other rare conditions. A complete clinical, radiological and endoscopic evaluation of the patient is required to make the diagnosis, with complimentary histopathologic studies. EBD are used in exceptional cases, some with advantages over surgical intervention depending on each patient in particular and on the characteristics and etiology of the gastric outlet obstruction. Local steroid injection and electrocauterization can augment the effect of EBD. The future of endoscopic treatment seems to be aimed at the use of endoscopic electrocauterization and balloon dilatations.
Collapse
|
19
|
Däster S, Soysal SD, Stoll L, Peterli R, von Flüe M, Ackermann C. Long-term quality of life after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Surg 2014; 38:2345-51. [PMID: 24756548 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2576-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy has a potentially high impact on physical, emotional, and social functions. The aim of this study was to assess long-term health-related quality of life (QOL) after esophageal cancer surgery. METHODS We analyzed all patients who underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer in our hospital from 1999 to 2010. QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer general questionnaire QLQ-C30 and esophagus-specific questionnaire QLQ-OES18. RESULTS A total of 150 patients were operated in the surveyed 12-year period. At the time of analysis, 46 patients (31 %) were eligible for assessment, 97 patients (65 %) had died or experienced tumor recurrence, and seven patients (5 %) were lost to follow-up. Of the 46 eligible patients, 43 (94 %) returned the questionnaires. The median observation interval between the operation and QOL assessment was 40 (range 21-135) months. The QLQ-C30 mean score of global health status and general QOL was similar to that of a healthy reference population. Most of the QLQ-C30 mean scores of functional and symptom scales and QLQ-OES18 symptom scales showed a worse result than for a healthy reference population. The highest mean scores were reflux and eating problems. CONCLUSIONS In the long term, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy provides a generally good QOL for patients with esophageal cancer, which is comparable to a healthy reference population. However, some patients suffer from significant symptoms. Reflux and eating problems were the most relevant complaints. Dietary counseling is therefore important in the postoperative course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvio Däster
- Department of Surgery, Claraspital, Kleinriehenstrasse 30, 4058, Basel, Switzerland,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess the necessity of a pyloric drainage procedure during an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Earlier data recommend performing a pyloric drainage procedure for all esophagectomies; however, recent studies have questioned this. A thorough literature search (January 2001-November 2011) was performed using the terms esophagectomy, pyloroplasty, pyloromyotomy, botulinum toxin, and pyloric drainage. Only studies that compared patient outcome after undergoing an esophagectomy with a pyloric drainage procedure with those undergoing an esophagectomy without a pyloric drainage procedure were selected. Only four studies, comprising 668 patients in total, were identified that compared patient outcome after undergoing an esophagectomy with or without a pyloric drainage procedure, and two additional meta-analyses were identified and selected for discussion. All studies were retrospective, and because of the heterogeneity of studies, patient demographics, reporting, and statistical analysis of patient outcome, pooling of data and meta-analysis could not be performed. Careful analysis demonstrated that pyloric drainage procedure was associated with a non-significant trend for delayed gastric emptying and biliary reflux, while not affecting the incidence of dumping. No correlation was determined between a pyloric drainage procedure and anastomotic leaks, postoperative pulmonary complications, length of hospital stay, and overall perioperative morbidity. While there are risks associated with a pyloric drainage procedure and data exist supporting its omission during an esophagectomy, no good conclusion can be drawn from the current literature. Larger multi-institutional, prospective studies are required to definitively answer this question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Gaur
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Antonoff MB, Puri V, Meyers BF, Baumgartner K, Bell JM, Broderick S, Krupnick AS, Kreisel D, Patterson GA, Crabtree TD. Comparison of pyloric intervention strategies at the time of esophagectomy: is more better? Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97:1950-7; discussion 1657-8. [PMID: 24751155 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2013] [Revised: 02/09/2014] [Accepted: 02/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controversy remains regarding the role of pyloric drainage procedures after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. We aimed to compare the effect of pyloric drainage strategies upon subsequent risk of complications suggestive of conduit distention, including aspiration and anastomotic leak. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted reviewing patients undergoing esophagectomy between January 2007 and April 2012. Prospectively collected data included baseline comorbidities, operative details, hospital course, and complications. Statistical comparisons were performed using analysis of variance for continuous variables and χ(2) testing for categorical variables. RESULTS There were 361 esophagectomies performed during the study period; 68 were excluded from analysis (for prior esophagogastric surgery or benign disease or both). Among 293 esophagectomies included, emptying procedures were performed as follows: 44 (15%), no drainage procedure; 197 (67%), pyloromyotomy/pyloroplasty; 8 (3%), dilation alone; 44 (15%), dilation plus onabotulinumtoxinA. Aspiration occurred more frequently when no pyloric intervention was performed (5 of 44 [11.4%] versus 6 of 249 [2.4%], p = 0.030). The incidences of anastomotic leak (18 [6.1%]) and gastric outlet obstruction (5 [1.7%]) were statistically similar among groups. Subgroup analysis demonstrated persistence of these findings when limiting the comparison to transthoracic esophagectomies. Major complications directly related to pyloroplasty/pyloromyotomy occurred in 2 patients (0.6%), including 1 death (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that omission of pyloric intervention at the index operation results in more frequent aspiration events. The combination of dilation plus onabotulinumtoxinA provided for a similar complication profile compared with surgical drainage. Future prospective comparisons are needed to evaluate these short-term effects of pyloric intervention as well as long-term sequelae such as dumping syndrome and bile reflux.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara B Antonoff
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Varun Puri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Bryan F Meyers
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kevin Baumgartner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer M Bell
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Stephen Broderick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - A Sasha Krupnick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Daniel Kreisel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - G Alexander Patterson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Traves D Crabtree
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Li B, Zhang JH, Wang C, Song TN, Wang ZQ, Gou YJ, Yang JB, Wei XP. Delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy for malignancy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014; 24:306-11. [PMID: 24742329 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controversy still exists about the need for pyloric drainage procedures after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Although pyloric drainage may prevent postoperative delayed gastric emptying (DGE), it may also promote dumping syndrome and bile reflux. The aims of this study were to audit the incidence and management of DGE in patients without routine pyloric drainage after esophagectomy in a university medical center. PATIENTS AND METHODS From July 2006 to June 2012, data from 356 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy with a gastric conduit without pyloric drainage for esophageal or gastric cardia carcinoma were reviewed. Major observation parameters were the incidence, management, and outcomes of DGE. RESULTS Overall incidence of DGE was 15.7% (56 of 356). Early DGE developed in 26 patients, and late DGE developed in 30 patients. There were no differences in demographic and intraoperative data between the two groups with or without DGE. More DGE was documented in patients with an intra-right thoracic gastric conduit (P=.031). A higher incidence of postoperative pneumonia was observed in patients exhibiting early DGE, but without significance (P=.254). There were also no significant impacts on respiratory failure (P=.848) and anastomotic leakage (P=.257). There was an increased postoperative hospital stay with DGE, but without significance (P=.089). Endoscopic balloon dilatation of the pylorus was used to manage 33.9% of patients with DGE, yielding a 78.9% (15 of 19) success rate without complications. In 3 patients endoscopy showed the pylorus was open, and their symptoms improved over time. One patient with tumor-related DGE was treated by pyloric stent. The remaining patients were adequately treated with conservative management. CONCLUSIONS Omitting the operative drainage procedure does not lead to an increased frequency of DGE after esophagectomy with a gastric conduit. Many patients responded to conservative management, and endoscopic balloon pyloric dilatation can be effective in managing the DGE postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lanzhou University Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Complications following esophagectomy significantly affect the outcome, including perioperative mortality, costs and survival. Pulmonary complications and anastomotic leaks still remain the most serious complications and early recognition and appropriate initial treatment are essential. Mortality associated with esophageal leaks is decreasing due in part to the increased use of computed tomography (CT) scanning and endoscopy for diagnosis and subsequent appropriate multidisciplinary therapy. In this respect, it is critically important to differentiate between leaks and conduit necrosis, and endoscopic examination is the best method for making this assessment. Endoscopic and interventional radiology techniques are being applied increasingly for detection of intrathoracic leaks but appropriate patient selection is important. Adequate external drainage of the leak and prevention of further contamination are the primary therapeutic goals. The spectrum of therapeutic options ranges from simple conservative treatment for smaller, well drained leaks, interventional placement of drains, to endoscopic intervention with closure of the fistula or placement of stents and reoperation or discontinuity resection for conduit necrosis.
Collapse
|