Benchtop testing and comparisons among three types of through-the-scope endoscopic clipping devices

Advancements in endoscopic hemostasis for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, through-the-scope (TTS) clips, thermal therapy, and injection therapies are used to treat GI bleeding. In this review, we provide an overview of novel endoscopic treatments that can be used to achieve hemostasis. Specifically, we discuss the efficacy and applicability of over-the-scope clips, hemostatic agents, TTS doppler ultrasound, and endoscopic ultrasound, each of which offer an effective method of reducing rates of GI rebleeding.

Through-the-scope clip retention rates and performance in a porcine model

Background and study aims Limited comparative data exist to guide optimal through-the-scope (TTS) clip selection. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, retention, and safety of three industry-leading TTS clips on tissue that mimics common clinical scenarios. Methods A survival study involving six domestic pigs was undertaken. Three commonly used clip models were selected: Assurance (STERIS, Mentor, Ohio, United States), Resolution (Boston Scientific, Boston, Massachusetts, United States), and SureClip (Micro-Tech, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States). To mimic clinical practice, the following scenarios were assessed: (1) normal mucosa; (2) cold snare resection; and (3) hot mucosal resection simulating fibrotic ulcers. Deployment of clips was randomized to target sites. Repeat endoscopy was performed 2 weeks following placement. Endoscopists rated the ease of use of clip placement on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Results Fifty-four clips (18 Assurance, 18 Resolution, and 18 SureClip) were placed in six pigs. Mucosal healing was noted at all sites on follow up. Overall retention was nine of 18 (50.0%) SureClip, 10 of 18 (55.6%) Assurance, and 13 of 18 (72.2%) Resolution ( P =0.369). There was no difference in clip retention on normal and cold snare resection sites; however, clip retention was significantly higher for Resolution clips on fibrotic ulcers (50.0% versus 0% for Assurance and 0% SureClip, P =0.03). No adverse events were reported. Ease of use was equivalent across all models. Conclusions All clips were equivalent in efficacy and safety with successful clip deployment and mucosal healing. Overall retention rate was low for fibrotic tissue, with an improved retention rate observed with Resolution clips.

Suturing techniques with endoscopic clips and special devices after endoscopic resection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established method for complete resection of large and early gastrointestinal tumors. However, methods to reduce bleeding, perforation, and other adverse events after endoscopic resection (ER) have not yet been defined. Mucosal defect closure is often performed endoscopically with a clip. Recently, reopenable clips and large-teeth clips have also been developed. The over-the-scope clip enables complete defect closure by withdrawing the endoscope once and attaching the clip. Other methods involve attaching the clip-line or a ring with an anchor to appose the edges of the mucosal defect, followed by the use of an additional clip for defect closure. Since clips are limited by their grasping force and size, other methods, such as endoloop closure, endoscopic ligation with O-ring closure, and the reopenable clip over-the-line method, have been developed. In recent years, techniques often utilized for full-thickness ER of submucosal tumors have been widely used in full-thickness defect closure. Specialized devices and techniques for defect closure have also been developed, including the curved needle and line, stitches, and an endoscopic tack and suture device. These clips and suture devices are applied for defect closure in emergency endoscopy, accidental perforations, and acute and chronic fistulas. Although endoscopic defect closure with clips has a high success rate, endoscopists need to simplify and promote endoscopic closure techniques to prevent adverse events after ER.

Effect of prophylactic endoscopic clipping for prevention of delayed bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm: a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND : Endoscopic clip placement is technically challenging using a duodenoscope, limiting their application for treatment of bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy. This study evaluated the efficacy of newly designed clips to prevent bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy. METHODS : Patients (n = 80) with suspected benign adenomas on the major papilla who were scheduled for endoscopic papillectomy with or without clipping were randomized. A new duodenoscope-compatible clip capable of being rotated, reopened, and repeatedly repositioned was used. The primary end point was incidence of delayed bleeding. RESULTS : The clipping procedure was successful in all patients. The incidence of delayed bleeding was nonsignificantly higher in the no-clipping group than in the clipping group (31.6 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 19.1-47.5] vs. 15.0 % [95 %CI 7.1-29.1]). The incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis did not differ significantly between the groups (clipping vs. no-clipping: 17.5 % [95 %CI 8.7-31.9] vs. 5.3 % [95 %CI 1.5-17.3]), and all cases were mild. CONCLUSIONS : Placement of the newly designed rotatable clip was technically feasible and tended to have a protective effect by preventing delayed bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy, although statistical significance was not reached.

Predicting and managing complications following colonoscopy: risk factors and management of advanced interventional endoscopy with a focus on colorectal ESD

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been introduced widely in Western and Asian countries. The management of the perforation during ESD is crucial.

AREAS COVERED

The rate of intraprocedural perforation, risk factors, prevention, and management of perforation during ESD and EMR were discussed in this review. The perforation rate in ESD and EMR depending on the lesion size is also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The knowledge regarding the risk factor and techniques to manage perforation is important during colorectal ESD and EMR. The development of novel suturing techniques devices is key for colorectal ESD in the future.

Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement - Update 2020

1:  ESGE recommends that each center implements a written policy regarding the management of iatrogenic perforations, including the definition of procedures that carry a higher risk of this complication. This policy should be shared with the radiologists and surgeons at each center. 2 : ESGE recommends that in the case of an endoscopically identified perforation, the endoscopist reports its size and location, with an image, and statement of the endoscopic treatment that has been applied. 3:  ESGE recommends that symptoms or signs suggestive of iatrogenic perforation after an endoscopic procedure should be rapidly and carefully evaluated and documented with a computed tomography (CT) scan. 4 : ESGE recommends that endoscopic closure should be considered depending on the type of the iatrogenic perforation, its size, and the endoscopist expertise available at the center. Switch to carbon dioxide (CO2) endoscopic insufflation, diversion of digestive luminal content, and decompression of tension pneumoperitoneum or pneumothorax should also be performed. 5 : ESGE recommends that after endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic perforation, further management should be based on the estimated success of the endoscopic closure and on the general clinical condition of the patient. In the case of no or failed endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic perforation, and in patients whose clinical condition is deteriorating, hospitalization and surgical consultation are recommended.

Transoral Endoscopic Approach to Repair Early Pharyngeal Perforations After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery without Failure of Instrumentation: Our Experience and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Pharyngoesophageal injury during anterior cervical spine surgery is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication; generally it is the result of intraoperative manipulation or hardware erosion and sometimes may be due to weakness of the pharyngoesophageal wall from pre-existing pathologic conditions, such as diabetes, gastritis, or obesity.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We describe the management strategies in patients with an early postoperative hypopharyngeal perforation that occurred after anterior cervical spine surgery without failure of instrumentation, and we present a case treated endoscopically at our institution.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate treatment for pharyngoesophageal perforations is controversial and not investigated in detail. There is a lack of prospective studies comparing initial conservative versus surgical approaches to treatment. In addition, endoscopic management is growing as a therapeutic option, but no consensus concerning the indications for an endoscopic approach in the treatment of pharyngoesophageal injury in anterior cervical spine surgery is currently reached. A common theme proposed in the literature is that early recognition and aggressive investigation and treatment are essential to ensure a good outcome. A customized interdisciplinary surgical approach is essential for successful treatment. Use of the transoral endoscopic approach is a useful noninvasive method to treat this rare but potentially devastating complication.

Choosing the right through-the-scope clip: a rigorous comparison of rotatability, whip, open/close precision, and closure strength (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many new through-the-scope clips are available, and physicians often select clips based on physical characteristics and/or cost. However, functional profiles may be equally important and have not been methodically assessed. We evaluated 5 commercially available clips: Resolution 360, Instinct, Quick Clip Pro, Dura Clip, and SureClip.

METHODS

We rigorously compared clips on multiple characteristics, including rotatability, overshoot, open/close precision, and tensile/closure strength. Clips were tested in 4 different endoscope configurations: (1) straight, (2) duodenal sweep, (3) full retroflexion, and (4) across the duodenoscope elevator.

RESULTS

For rotatability, the Resolution 360 was the fastest due to its unique functionality in allowing primary MD control in rotation (P < .05). The Resolution 360, SureClip, and Dura Clip were able to rotate through the prescribed sequence across all scope configurations. For overshoot, the SureClip and Resolution 360 had the least overshoot for the straight configuration at 0%. All clips had >75% overshoot at more strained configurations. For open/close precision, the SureClip and Dura Clip showed precise opening/closing with the ability to stop at any point. The remaining clips exhibited abrupt opening with more controlled closure. For tensile strength, the Quick Clip Pro generated the highest peak force as would be required in lateral tissue manipulation (4.8 lb, P < .005). For closure strength, the Instinct overall showed the most gel compression, and along with the Resolution 360, showed 100% deployment success for all gel tissue thicknesses (up to 10 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Each clip has a unique physical and functional profile, which may be a factor in selection depending on the clinical circumstance.

Endoscopic Treatment of Transesophageal Echocardiography-Induced Esophageal Perforation

BACKGROUND

Perforation of the esophagus is the most severe complication of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and can lead to mediastinitis, pleural empyema, or peritonitis. Currently, the majority of patients receive operative treatment with only 6% treated endoscopically. We report our experience with endoscopic and conservative approaches.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for esophageal perforation and included all patients with perforation caused by TEE. All patients with perforation of the esophagus by TEE probe underwent conservative or endoscopic treatment, drainage of pleural and mediastinal retentions, and adjusted to antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

From January 2004 to December 2014 a total of 109 patients were treated for esophageal perforation in our department. In 6 patients (5.5%) the perforation was caused by TEE. Location was cervical and midthoracic in 2 and 4 cases, respectively. All patients underwent successful endoscopic treatment and no further surgical procedure, such as esophageal suture or resection was necessary. The mean time between TEE and therapy of the perforation was 7.3 days. In all patients closure of the leakage could be achieved within 30 days. Mortality rate was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal perforations caused by TEE are typically small, in the cervical and mid esophagus, and minimally contaminated. These are good prognostic factors for successful endoscopic treatment with preservation of the esophagus. Operative treatment should only be considered in cases of failed endoscopic treatment.

Novel endoscopic multi-firing-clip applicator for endoscopic closure of large colonic perforations

BACKGROUND

Existing endoclip closure devices have difficulty in closing large colonic perforation. We developed a novel endoscopic multi-firing-clip applicator (EMFCA) system to address these limitations, and report on its initial evaluation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The functionality and efficacy of the prototype EMFCA equipped with re-openable clamp and preloaded with four clips were assessed using standardized 1.5 cm incisions created in ex-vivo porcine colonic segments. Endoscopic closure of the lacerations with two, three and four clips (n = five for each group) was followed by measurement of the leakage pressure of the three groups. Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to validate the clip behavior and reliability during deployment.

RESULTS

All 15 perforations were sealed without leakage until fully distended. The leakage pressures of colonic lacerations sealed with two, three, and four clips were 26.1 ± 2.8 mmHg, 37.3 ± 7.3 mmHg and 42.3 ± 7.4 mmHg, respectively. The mean operation time to deploy one clip was 25.4 ± 5.2 seconds. On FEA, the deformation of the shape of the clip matched that of the intended design, with each clip sustaining a maximum stress of 648.5 MPa without any material failure during deployment.

CONCLUSIONS

These initial results confirm the efficacy of the EMFCA prototype system for endoscopic closure of colonic perforations.

Endoscopic hemostasis state of the art - Nonvariceal bleeding

New endoscopic techniques for hemostasis in nonvariceal bleeding were introduced and known methods further improved. Hemospray and Endoclot are two new compounds for topical treatment of bleeding. Initial studies in this area have shown a good hemostatic effect, especially in active large scale oozing bleeding, e.g., tumor bleedings. For further evaluation larger prospective studies comparing the substanced with other methods of endoscopic hemostasis are needed. For localized active arterial bleeding primary injection therapy in the area of ​​bleeding as well as in the four adjacent quadrants offers a good method to reduce bleeding activity. The injection is technically easy to learn and practicable. After bleeding activity is reduced the bleeding source can be localized more clearly for clip application. Today many different through-the-scope (TTS) clips are available. The ability to close and reopen a clip can aid towards good positioning at the bleeding site. Even more important is the rotatability of a clip before application. Often multiple TTS clips are required for secure closure of a bleeding vessel. One model has the ability to use three clips in series without changing the applicator. Severe arterial bleeding from vessels larger than 2 mm is often unmanageable with these conventional methods. Here is the over-the-scope-clip system another newly available method. It is similar to the ligation of esophageal varices and involves aspiration of tissue into a transparent cap before closure of the clip. Thus a greater vascular occlusion pressure can be achieved and larger vessels can be treated endoscopically. Patients with severe arterial bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract have a very high rate of recurrence after initial endoscopic treatment. These patients should always be managed in an interdisciplinary team of interventional radiologist and surgeons.

Cap-assisted hemoclip application with forward-viewing endoscope for hemorrhage induced by endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective case series study

Background

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is a therapeutic technique developed as an advanced application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). An important adverse event associated with this procedure is hemorrhage, which may sometimes be uncontrollable. We sought to examine whether cap-assisted hemoclip application is effective in controlling ES–induced hemorrhage.

Methods

In this prospective study, we investigated the outcomes in 10 patients who had uncontrolled ES–induced hemorrhage and were treated by cap-assisted application of hemoclip with a forward-viewing endoscope.

Results

Nine of the 10 investigated patients were successfully treated using the cap-assisted hemoclip technique with forward-viewing endoscope, yielding a success rate of 90 %. The patient with hemorrhage non-responsive to hemoclipping required catheter embolization of the bleeding artery after its identification by digital subtraction angiography. One of the 10 patients developed mild pancreatitis after the procedure, but was successfully managed conservatively.

Conclusions

Cap-assisted hemoclip application with a forward-viewing endoscope appears to be an effective therapeutic modality for achieving hemostasis in cases of ES–induced hemorrhage, without the occurrence of any severe adverse events; we believe that this method should be considered as an option in the management of ES–induced hemorrhage.

'It's all foreign to me': how to decipher gastrointestinal intraluminal foreign bodies

In evaluating the gastrointestinal tract, whether in the emergency room setting, the inpatient setting or the outpatient setting, the radiologist may encounter a myriad of intraluminal radio-opaque, non-anatomic entities. It is the radiologist's role to distinguish between true foreign bodies and medical paraphernalia. Further, the later must be evaluated for proper positioning vs. improper, potentially detrimental positioning. While many foreign bodies from the community may be distinctly familiar to the radiologist, the large variety of medical tools in existence may not be. Furthermore, many medical devices are designed to transiently traverse, or interact with the gastrointestinal tract, requiring the radiologist to become familiar with their natural history. We explore a select group of common and uncommon intraluminal foreign bodies and will divide them into medical paraphernalia that are properly positioned; medical paraphernalia that are in abnormal locations and miscellaneous foreign bodies from the community. For each medical tool, we will discuss its development and medical utility, natural history as it relates to the gastrointestinal tract, optimal positioning as assessed radiologically, malpositioning, and subsequent complications. A small selection of unusual foreign bodies from the community will be presented. Finally, a selection of medical conditions which produce symptoms due to acquired intraluminal objects will be reviewed.

Deployment of a Short, Single-Opening Endoscopic Clip Versus a Long, Reopening Endoscopic Clip in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic clips vary in their designs and costs. Clip wastage is a common problem, and this is dependent on the success of its deployment.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to compare the rates of successful deployment between two different commonly used endoscopic clips.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. Endoscopy reports of patients with clips deployed over 24 months were reviewed. We compared a long-pronged, reopening endoscopic clip (type A: Resolution clip; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) versus a short-pronged, single-opening clip (type B: QuickClip2; Olympus Medical Systems Corp, Japan). The main outcome was clip deployment success rate. Secondary outcomes were predictors of successful deployment, cost, and wastage.

RESULTS

Of 14,690 endoscopic cases, 472 clips (171 type A and 301 type B) were deployed in 262 procedures. Type A clips had a significantly higher successful deployment rate (147/171, 86.0 %) than type B clips (221/301, 73.4 %) (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, variables independently associated with successful deployment included using type A clips (OR 2.07, 95 % CI 1.20-3.55; p = 0.009) and clips placed in the lower gastrointestinal tract (OR 3.48, 95 % CI 1.64-7.40; p = 0.001). The cost of using type A clips was higher than type B clips (p < 0.001). Type B clips were associated with more wastage (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-pronged, reopening clips (type A) have a better deployment rate than short-pronged, single-opening clips (type B). Although type A clips had less wastage, the cost per procedure was higher.

New and emerging endoscopic haemostasis techniques

Endoscopic treatment has been accepted as first-line treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, both for variceal as well as for non-variceal haemorrhage. Dual modality treatment including injection therapy with mechanical or thermal haemostatic techniques has shown superior outcome compared with injection monotherapy in non-variceal bleeding. During recent years, new endoscopic devices have been developed and existing endoscopic techniques have been adapted to facilitate primary control of bleeding or achieve haemostasis in refractory haemorrhage. For mechanical haemostasis, larger, rotatable and repositionable clips have been developed; multiple-preloaded clips are also available now. Over the scope clips allow to ligate larger vessels and can close ulcer defects up to 20 mm. Topical, easily applied substances withdraw fluid from the blood and thereby initiate blood clotting. This can be helpful in diffuse oozing bleeding, for example, from tumour or hypertensive gastropathy and has also shown promising results in variceal and arterial bleeding as bridging before definitive treatment is available. Radiofrequency ablation and multiband ligation have emerged as new tools in the endoscopic management of gastric antral vascular ectasia. In acute refractory variceal bleeding, a covered and removable oesophagus stent can provide tamponade and gain time for transport to an interventional endoscopic centre or for radiological intervention such as TIPS.

Immediate technical and delayed clinical outcome of fistula closure using an over-the-scope clip device

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

An over-the-scope clip (OTSC) device was designed for closure of acute perforations, fistulas, leaks, and non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding. Previous data show a high rate of early fistula closure using the OTSC; however, data on long-term fistula closure are scant. We report our experience using an OTSC for closure of chronic gastrointestinal fistulas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients, who underwent OTSC placement at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Virginia Mason Medical Center for closure of chronic fistulas from October 2011 to September 2012, was performed. Initial technical success was defined by lack of contrast extravasation immediately after OTSC placement. Delayed success was defined by resolution of the fistula without the need for additional therapies. Recurrent fistula was defined by the recurrence of symptoms and/or re-demonstration of fistula after initial success.

RESULTS

Forty-seven unique patients (24 men; mean age 57 ± 14 years) underwent 60 procedures using the OTSC for closure of gastrointestinal fistulas. Fistula locations were: small bowel (n = 18), stomach (n = 16), colo-rectum (n = 10), and esophagus (n = 3). Fistulas related to previous percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy (n = 10) or prior bariatric procedure (n = 10) were the most common etiologies. Initial technical success occurred in 42/47 (89%) index cases; however, 19/41 (46%) patients developed fistula recurrence at a median of 39 days (IQR 26-86 days). The retained OTSC was present adjacent to the fistula in 16/19 (84%) at repeat intervention. Patients were followed for a median length of 178 days (IQR 63-326 days), and only 25/47 (53%) patients demonstrated delayed clinical success using OTSC.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial technical fistula closure can be achieved using OTSCs. Recurrent fistulas at the same location occur in approximately 50% of cases despite frequent OTSC clip retention.

Endoscopic band ligation for closure of GI perforations in a porcine animal model (with video)

BACKGROUND

GI perforations occur rarely during endoscopy but have life-threatening implications.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for closure of acute GI perforations by using a porcine model.

DESIGN

Investigator-initiated interventional pilot study by using an in vivo porcine model.

SETTING

Tertiary-care institution.

SUBJECTS

Ten domestic pigs.

INTERVENTION

Each animal underwent a single endoscopic procedure, with creation of a single GI lumen perforation. Perforations of 10 to 20 mm were created in the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and colon. EBL was used for closure. Fourteen days later, the pigs were killed, microbial cultures were obtained, and histologic review was done.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Immediate and delayed endoscopic closure of the perforation site, evidence of clinical peritonitis during the 14-day follow-up.

RESULTS

Ten pigs completed the protocol and survived without clinical peritonitis during the 14-day follow-up. Endoscopic closure of a 15-mm esophageal perforation failed, thus, no attempt was made to close a 20-mm esophageal perforation. Closure of all other perforations was successful. At necropsy, fibrinous peritonitis was suspected in one animal with a 10-mm duodenal perforation. Chronic inflammation and fibroplasia at the perforation sites were the most common histologic findings.

LIMITATIONS

The applicability of widespread use in humans remains unknown despite successful case reports in the medical literature.

CONCLUSION

EBL can be used successfully to close 10 to 20 mm perforations within normal stomach, duodenum, and colon and can prevent clinically relevant intra-abdominal infections. However, for esophageal perforations, closure may be limited to small (≤10 mm), iatrogenic perforations.

Which clip? A prospective comparative study of retention rates of endoscopic clips on normal mucosa and ulcers in a porcine model

BACKGROUND/AIM

There are currently no data on the relative retention rates of the Instinct clip, Resolution clip, and QuickClip2Long. Also, it is unknown whether retention rate differs when clips are applied to ulcerated rather than normal mucosa. The aim of this study is to compare the retention rates of three commonly used endoscopic clips.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six pigs underwent upper endoscopy with placement of one of each of the three types of clips on normal mucosa in the gastric body. Three mucosal resections were also performed to create "ulcers." Each ulcer was closed with placement of one of the three different clips. Repeat endoscopy was performed weekly for up to 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Only the Instinct and Resolution clips remained attached for the duration of the study (4 weeks). At each time point, a greater proportion of Instinct clips were retained on normal mucosa, followed by Resolution clips. QuickClip2Long had the lowest retention rate on normal mucosa. Similar retention rates of Instinct clips and Resolution clips were seen on simulated ulcers, although both were superior to QuickClip2Long. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance. All QuickClip2Long clips were dislodged at 4 weeks in both the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The Resolution and Instinct clips have comparable retention rates and both appeared to be better than the QuickClip2Long on normal mucosa-simulated ulcers; however this did not reach statistical significance. Both the Resolution clip and the Instinct clip may be preferred in clinical situations when long-term clip attachment is required, including marking of tumors for radiotherapy and anchoring feeding tubes or stents. Either of the currently available clips may be suitable for closure of iatrogenic mucosal defects without features of chronicity.