Perioperative inflammatory response in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery

Feasibility of a Portable Abdominal Insufflation Device for Controlling Intraperitoneal Bleeding After Abdominal Blunt Trauma

Uncontrolled bleeding contributes to 30% to 40% of trauma-related deaths and is the leading cause of potentially preventable deaths. Currently, there is no effective method available to first responders for temporary control of noncompressible intraabdominal bleeding while patients are transported to the hospital. Our previous studies demonstrated that abdominal insufflation provides effective temporary bleeding control. The study aims to prove the feasibility (insufflation to a target pressure) and safety (cardiovascular and respiratory effects) of a novel portable abdominal insufflation device (PAID) designed to control the intraperitoneal bleeding caused by abdominal trauma. The PAID prototype is based on a patented design and manufactured via additive manufacturing. PAID contains a 16-g CO2cartridge and an electronic pressure transducer. PAID was tested on a bench top and a swine animal model. For the animal model study, the intraperitoneal pressure as well as cardiorespiratory parameters (hearth rate, SpO2[peripheral capillary oxygen saturation], and blood pressure) were continuously monitored during the insufflation procedure. The prototype functioned according to specifications on both bench top and animal models. CO2insufflation of the peritoneal cavity was delivered up the target 20 mm Hg and maintained for 30 minutes from 1 or 2 cartridges in the swine model. No intraoperative incidents were registered, and all the recorded physiological parameters were within normal limits. The PAID prototype is a feasible, easy to use device that provides quick, controlled, and safe insufflation of the peritoneal cavity. Future studies will focus on testing the next-generation, semiautomatic PAID prototype in a severe intraabdominal injury model.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided puncture suture device versus metal clip for gastric defect closure after endoscopic full-thickness resection: A randomized, comparative, porcine study

Objective:

The secure closure of the wall defect is a critical stage of endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). The aim of this study was to compare the closure of post-EFTR defects using an endoscopic ultrasound-guided puncture suture device (PSD) with the metal clip (MC) technique in a randomized, comparative, porcine study.

Methods:

We performed a randomized comparative survival study that included 18 pigs. The circular EFTR defects with a diameter of approximately 20 mm were closed with either a PSD or MC. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined preoperatively and on a postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, and 7. Three animals from each group were sacrificed at the end of the 7^th, 14^th, and 30^th POD. Tissue samples retrieved from the closure sites were examined macroscopically and microscopically.

Results:

Resection and closure were performed in 18 pigs (100%) without major perioperative complications. The mean closure time was significantly longer in the MC group than in the PSD group (25.00 ± 3.16 min vs. 1.56 ± 0.39 min; P < 0.05). Preoperative and POD 7 serum levels of IL-6 did not differ between the two groups. However, on POD 1, the IL-6 levels were observed to be significantly greater in the MC group than in the PSD group (P < 0.005). No significant differences between the PSD and MC groups were observed at necropsy.

Conclusion:

In this in vivo porcine model, PSD is a feasible device that achieves post-EFTR defect closure with a much shorter closure time and with less immunological responses than the MC technique.

Surgical Trauma Caused by Different Abdominal Access Routes-Comparison of Open Surgical, Laparoscopic, and NOTES Transgastric Techniques in a Porcine Model

BACKGROUND

Investigations indicate that natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures induce a less pronounced postoperative inflammatory response than open or laparoscopic surgery, inflicting less trauma. In NOTES procedures, no skin incision is performed. We compare the inflammatory response added by the type of incision by measuring C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumors necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-α).

METHODS

Twenty-seven pigs were randomized to open surgical, laparoscopic, or transgastric NOTES abdominal access. After completion of the accesses, no surgery was performed. All accesses were left open for 40 minutes followed by closure, animals were survived for 7 days. Blood samples were drawn at the start of the accesses, at 20 and 40 minutes during the procedure, and at postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, and 7. Analyses of CRP and TNF-α were performed.

RESULTS

CRP increased in all animals until POD1. This increase was greater in the open group (P = .006). No significant differences in CRP-levels were found at POD 1, 3, or 7. TNF-α showed a peak during the procedure, at 20 and 40 minutes, with normalization at POD1 for 1/3 of the open and laparoscopic animals, but not for the NOTES animals. Due to variations within the groups, no statistical difference was shown between them. At postmortem, 1/3 of the pigs in the laparoscopic and open groups had wound infections, while no NOTES animals showed infections.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides no statistically significant differences in inflammatory response after the different abdominal accesses. However, the lack of a TNF-α-peak in the NOTES group might indicate a less pronounced response, supporting the initial theories.

Anesthetic management of transoral natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: two cases report

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an evolving field of minimally invasive surgery. NOTES reaches the target organ by inserting the endoscope through a natural orifice (e.g. mouth, anus, urethra, vagina) and offers advantages of less postoperative pain and lower complication rate. Since its first description in 2004, NOTES has progressed from use on animal models to humans. We experienced anesthetic care of two patients who underwent transoral NOTES under general anesthesia.