|
1
|
Wellington J, Canakis A, Kim R. Endoscopic closure devices: A review of technique and application for hemostasis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2019. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii190012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Wellington
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew Canakis
- Department of Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Raymond Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Saxena P, Ji-Shin E, Haito-Chavez Y, Valeshabad AK, Akshintala V, Aguila G, Kumbhari V, Ruben DS, Lennon AM, Singh V, Canto M, Kalloo A, Khashab MA. Which clip? A prospective comparative study of retention rates of endoscopic clips on normal mucosa and ulcers in a porcine model. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:360-5. [PMID: 25434317 PMCID: PMC4271011 DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.145328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM There are currently no data on the relative retention rates of the Instinct clip, Resolution clip, and QuickClip2Long. Also, it is unknown whether retention rate differs when clips are applied to ulcerated rather than normal mucosa. The aim of this study is to compare the retention rates of three commonly used endoscopic clips. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six pigs underwent upper endoscopy with placement of one of each of the three types of clips on normal mucosa in the gastric body. Three mucosal resections were also performed to create "ulcers." Each ulcer was closed with placement of one of the three different clips. Repeat endoscopy was performed weekly for up to 4 weeks. RESULTS Only the Instinct and Resolution clips remained attached for the duration of the study (4 weeks). At each time point, a greater proportion of Instinct clips were retained on normal mucosa, followed by Resolution clips. QuickClip2Long had the lowest retention rate on normal mucosa. Similar retention rates of Instinct clips and Resolution clips were seen on simulated ulcers, although both were superior to QuickClip2Long. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance. All QuickClip2Long clips were dislodged at 4 weeks in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS The Resolution and Instinct clips have comparable retention rates and both appeared to be better than the QuickClip2Long on normal mucosa-simulated ulcers; however this did not reach statistical significance. Both the Resolution clip and the Instinct clip may be preferred in clinical situations when long-term clip attachment is required, including marking of tumors for radiotherapy and anchoring feeding tubes or stents. Either of the currently available clips may be suitable for closure of iatrogenic mucosal defects without features of chronicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Payal Saxena
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eun Ji-Shin
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yamile Haito-Chavez
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ali K. Valeshabad
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Venkata Akshintala
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gerard Aguila
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dawn S. Ruben
- Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anne-Marie Lennon
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vikesh Singh
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marcia Canto
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anthony Kalloo
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mouen A. Khashab
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA,Address for correspondence: Asst. Prof. Mouen A. Khashab, Director of Therapeutic Endoscopy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans St, Suite 7125B, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Not all through-the-scope endoscopic clipping devices are born equal: some can be rotated while others cannot. Surg Endosc 2013; 27:3934. [PMID: 23636529 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2972-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2013] [Accepted: 04/08/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|