Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: feasibility study

The safety, feasibility, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: a prospective study with 3-year follow-up (FUGES-004 study)

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy (LCTG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) remains controversial.

METHODS

The primary outcome was postoperative morbidity within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), and recurrence. Inverse probability treatment weighted (IPTW) was used to balance the baseline between LCTG and OCTG.

RESULTS

Final analysis included 46 patients with RGC who underwent LCTG at the FJMUUH between June 2016 and June 2020. The historical control group comprised of 160 patients who underwent open completion total gastrectomy (OCTG) in the six tertiary teaching hospitals from CRGC-01 study. After IPTW, no significant difference was observed between the LCTG and OCTG groups in terms of incidence (LCTG vs. OCTG: 28.0 vs. 35.0%, P =0.379) or severity of complications within 30 days after surgery. Compared with OCTG, LCTG resulted in better short-term outcomes and faster postoperative recovery. However, the textbook outcome rate was comparable between the two groups (45.9 vs. 32.8%, P =0.107). Additionally, the 3-year DFS and 3-year OS of LCTG were comparable to those of OCTG (DFS: log-rank P =0.173; OS: log-rank P =0.319). No significant differences in recurrence type, mean recurrence time, or 3-year cumulative hazard of recurrence were observed between the two groups (all P >0.05). Subgroup analyses and concurrent comparisons demonstrated similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study suggested that LCTG was noninferior to OCTG in both short-term and long-term outcomes. In experienced centers, LCTG may be considered as a viable treatment option for RGC.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) remains controversial because of its rarity and heterogeneity of clinical characteristics. Based on our experience, we posited that our established methodology in LG could be applied to the laparoscopic procedure for RGC surgery and introduced LG for RGC at our institution in 2004.

METHODS

This study enrolled 46 patients who underwent LG for RGC between January 2004 and December 2017. Data were obtained through a review of our prospectively maintained database. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) was the standard surgical procedure for RGC. Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LsTG) was performed as an alternative procedure for patients with RGC located near the anastomotic site after primary gastrectomy. The technical and oncological feasibility and safety of LG for RGC were evaluated.

RESULTS

LTG for RGC was performed on 36 patients. LsTG for RGC was performed on 10 patients. All patients completed LG procedure and succeeded R0 resection. Complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ IIIa occurred in 4 (8.7%) patients. The retrospective video reviews showed that the time for adhesiotomy around the suprapancreatic area and the lesser curvature of the remnant stomach was significantly shorter in the primary-benign group than in the primary-malignant group. With the median follow-up period of 40 months, the 3-year recurrence-free survival and 3-year overall survival rates were 72.3% and 80.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LG for RGC represents a safe and feasible surgical option with favorable short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with RGC.

Laparoscopic Completion Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer Compared to Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy in Short- and Medium-Term Results

Introduction: The incidence of remnant gastric cancer is increasing in recent years. The advantages of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer are well established. However, laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer harbors difficulties due to adhesions, changed configuration of the anatomical organs, and changes on the lymphatic flow. We aim to investigate the feasibility, safety, and the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy compared to laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent total gastrectomy from January 2018 to December 2021 at Shamir Medical Center were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups-completion gastrectomy and total gastrectomy. The groups were compared for demographics, operative, and clinical outcomes. Results: Overall, 22 patients were included in the study. Eight were completion gastrectomy following subtotal gastrectomy for malignancy and 14 were primary total gastrectomy. All operations were performed by minimal invasive surgery technique. Average age was 64 years, with no differences in gender. Two major intraoperative complications were noted in completion group (25% versus 0%, P = .12). Both length of surgery (3:03 versus 3:40, P = .049) and length of stay (7 days versus 9 days, P = .5) were shorter in completion group. There were fewer postoperative complications (12.5% versus 28.5%, P = .61). Average number of harvested lymph nodes was significantly lower in completion group (10 versus 33, P = .002). Conclusion: Laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer is safe and feasible having comparable oncological surrogate's parameters and recurrence profile. Clinical Registration Number: 0015-22-ASF.

The Effect of Surgical Approach on Clinical Outcomes in 535 Patients with Remnant Gastric Cancer

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) on clinical outcomes in patients with remnant gastric cancer (RGC). Materials and Methods: The databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were used to search for eligible studies from inception to April 1st, 2023. Hazard ratios (HRs), mean difference (MD), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled up to analyze. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) scores were used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. This study was performed with RevMan 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) software. Results: A total of 11 studies involving 535 RGC patients were included in this study. In terms of basic information, we found that the OG group had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (≥2) (OR = 0.24, I2 = 54%, 95% CI = 0.08-0.71, P = .01) than the LG group. In terms of postoperative outcomes, we found that the LG group had longer operative time (MD = 33.95, I2 = 58%, 95% CI = 15.05-52.85, P < .01), shorter postoperative hospital stay (MD = 5.08, I2 = 84%, 95% CI = -9.74 to -0.42, P = .03), shorter length of incision (MD = -7.15, I2 = 94%, 95% CI = -10.99 to -3.31, P < .01), earlier food intake (MD = -3.09, I2 = 76%, 95% CI = -4.84 to -1.35, P < .01), and earlier time to first flatus (MD = -0.84, I2 = 0%, 95% CI = -1.09 to -0.59, P < .01). We found that there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (HR = 0.96, I2 = 0%, 95% CI = 0.48-1.93, P = .92) between the LG group and the OG group. Conclusion: LG for RGC patients had longer surgical time, shorter postoperative hospital stay, shorter length of incision, earlier food intake, and earlier time to first flatus.

Appraisal of gastric stump carcinoma and current state of affairs

Gastric stump carcinoma, also known as remnant gastric carcinoma, is a malignancy arising in the remnant stomach following gastrectomy for a benign or malignant condition. Enterogastric reflux and preexisting risk factors in a patient with gastric cancer are the major contributors to the development of gastric stump carcinoma. The occurrence of gastric stump carcinoma is time-dependent and seen earlier in patients operated on for malignant rather than benign diseases. The tumor location is predominantly at the anastomotic site towards the stomach. However, it can occur anywhere in the remnant stomach. The pattern of lymph node involvement and the type of surgery required is distinctly different compared to primary gastric cancer. Gastric stump carcinoma is traditionally considered a malignancy with a dismal outcome. However, recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have improved outcomes. Recent advances in molecular profiling of gastric stump carcinoma have identified distinct molecular subtypes, thereby providing novel therapeutic targets. Also, reports of gastric stump carcinoma following pancreatoduodenectomy and bariatric surgery highlight the need for more research to standardize the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of these tumors. The present review aims to provide an overview of gastric stump carcinoma highlighting the differences in clinicopathological profile and management compared to primary gastric carcinoma.

3D laparoscopic-assisted vs open gastrectomy for carcinoma in the remnant stomach: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic technique has gradually been applied to the treatment of carcinoma in the remnant stomach (CRS), but its clinical efficacy remains controversial.

AIM

To compare the short-term and long-term results of 3D laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (3DLAG) with open gastrectomy (OG) for CRS.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients diagnosed with CRS and admitted to the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2016 to January 2021 were retrospectively collected. A total of 84 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. All their clinical data were collected and a database was established. All patients were treated with 3DLAG or OG by experienced surgeons and were divided into two groups based on the different surgical methods mentioned above. By using outpatient and telephone follow-up, we were able to determine postoperative survival and tumor status. The postoperative short-term efficacy and 1-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among 84 patients with CRS, 48 were treated with OG and 36 with 3DLAG. All patients successfully completed surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index, ASA score, initial disease state (benign or malignant), primary surgical anastomosis method, interval time of carcinogenesis, and tumorigenesis site. Patients in the 3DLAG group experienced less intraoperative blood loss (188.33 ± 191.35 mL vs 305.83 ± 303.66 mL; P = 0.045) and smaller incision (10.86 ± 3.18 cm vs 20.06 ± 5.17 cm; P < 0.001) than those in the OG group. 3DLAGC was a more minimally invasive method. 3DLAGC retrieved significantly more lymph nodes than OG (14.0 ± 7.17 vs 10.73 ± 6.82; P = 0.036), whereas the number of positive lymph nodes did not differ between the two groups (1.56 ± 2.84 vs 2.35 ± 5.28; P = 0.413). The complication rate (8.3% vs 20.8%; P = 0.207) and intensive care unit admission rate (5.6% vs 14.5%; P = 0.372) were equivalent between the two groups. In terms of postoperative recovery, the 3DLAGC group had a lower visual analog score, shorter indwelling time of gastric and drainage tubes, shorter time of early off-bed motivation, shorter time of postoperative initial flatus and initial soft diet intake, shorter postoperative hospital stay and total hospital stay, and there were significant differences, showing better short-term efficacy. The 1-year and 3-year OS rates of OG group were 83.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 72.4%-95.6%] and 73.3% (95%CI: 60.0%-89.5%) respectively. The 1-year and 3-year OS rates of the 3DLAG group were 87.3% (95%CI: 76.4%-99.8%) and 75.6% (95%CI: 59.0%-97.0%), respectively. However, the 1-year and 3-year OS rates were similar between the two groups, which suggested that long-term survival results were comparable between the two groups (P = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Compared with OG, 3DLAG for CRS achieved better short-term efficacy and equivalent oncological results without increasing clinical complications. 3DLAG for CRS can be promoted safely and effectively in selected patients.

Postoperative Complications and Their Risk Factors of Completion Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer Following an Initial Gastrectomy for Cancer

PURPOSE

Completion total gastrectomy (CTG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is a technically demanding procedure and associated with increased morbidity. The present study aimed to evaluate postoperative complications and their risk factors following surgery for RGC after initial partial gastrectomy due to gastric cancer excluding peptic ulcer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 107 patients who had previously undergone an initial gastric cancer surgery and subsequently underwent CTG for RGC between March 2002 and December 2020. The postoperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors for complications.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications occurred in 34.6% (37/107) of the patients. Intra-abdominal abscess was the most common complication. The significant risk factors for overall complications were multi-visceral resections, longer operation time, and high estimated blood loss in the univariate analysis. The independent risk factors were multi-visceral resection (odds ratio [OR], 2.832; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.094-7.333; P=0.032) and longer operation time (OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.001-1.011; P=0.036) in the multivariate analysis. Previous reconstruction type, minimally invasive approach, and current stage were not associated with the overall complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-visceral resection and long operation time were significant risk factors for the occurrence of complications following CTG rather than the RGC stage or surgical approach. When multi-visceral resection is required, a more meticulous surgical procedure is warranted to improve the postoperative complications during CTG for RGC after an initial gastric cancer surgery.

Robot-assisted completion gastrectomy preserving interposed jejunum in remnant gastric cancer following a proximal gastrectomy reconstructed by jejunal interposition: A case report

Minimally invasive completion gastrectomy is technically demanding and comprises a variety of procedures depending on the previous operation. We present herein a case of robot-assisted completion gastrectomy preserving the interposed jejunum in remnant gastric cancer following a proximal gastrectomy reconstructed by jejunal interposition. A 76-year-old, male patient experienced newly developed stage cT1bN0M0 gastric cancer in the distal remnant stomach 5 years after his initial proximal gastrectomy. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was not feasible because of tumor depth and poor cancer cell differentiation. The robotic approach was chosen because of the early cancer stage, prior laparoscopic surgery, and the patient's advanced age. The interposed jejunum was successfully preserved, and a new overlap anastomosis was created between it and the retrocolic Roux-en-Y limb. Robot-assisted completion gastrectomy was safely performed even after a proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition.

Laparoscopic Completion Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer

Background: Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is increasing due to past use of subtotal gastrectomy to treat benign diseases, improvements in the detection of gastric cancer, and increased survival rates after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Laparoscopic access provides the advantages and benefits of minimally invasive surgery. However, laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy (LCTG) for RGC is technically demanding, even for experienced surgeons. Because of its rarity and heterogeneity, no standard surgical strategy has been established and few surgeons will develop technical expertise to carry out this procedure. Aim: To describe our standard technique, giving surgeons a head start in LCTG and report the early experience with this stepwise approach. Materials and Methods: We detail all the steps involved in the procedure, including trocar placement and surgical description. Results: Between 2009 and 2019, a total of 8 patients with past history of RGC were operated with this technique. All patients had been previously operated by open method, 7 due to peptic ulcer disease and 1 due to gastric cancer. Their mean age at the time of the first surgery was 38.9 years (range 25-56 years) and the mean interval between the first and the second gastrectomy was 32.1 years (range 13.6-49). Billroth II was the previous reconstruction in all cases. A 5-trocar technique was used followed by total gastrectomy with side-to-side stapled intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy anastomosis and Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The mean operation time was 272 minutes (range 180-330) and median blood loss was 247 mL (range 50-500). There was no conversion and no major intraoperative complication. Major postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients. Conclusion: Completion total gastrectomy for RGC is a morbid procedure and laparoscopic access is technically feasible, hopefully carrying the benefits of faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain, and wound complications. By standardizing the approach, the learning curve may be shortened and better results achieved.

Laparoscopic Completion Total Gastrectomy as a Standardized Procedure for Gastric Stump Cancer: A Case Control Study

Objective

Complete gastrectomy for gastric stump cancer (GSC) can be challenging due to severe adhesions; therefore, advanced techniques are required when being performed by laparoscopic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy (LCTG) for the treatment of GSC.

Methods

Patient records from January 2010 to October 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were classified into 2 groups depending on whether they underwent open or laparoscopic gastrectomy. We compared patient characteristics; operative, clinical, and pathological data between the groups.

Results

Twenty open and 17 LCTGs were performed. Laparoscopic gastrectomy resulted in a significantly longer operation time (230 versus 182.5 min; P = 0.026), lower blood loss (14 versus 105 mL; P &lt; 0.001), and shorter period to the first flatus passage (2 versus 3 days; P &lt; 0.001) than open gastrectomy. No significant differences in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, duration of hospital stay, complication rate, and postoperative analgesic usage between the 2 groups were observed. No patients required conversion to open surgery in the laparoscopic-treatment group. Pathologic findings revealed that the laparoscopic group had a smaller tumor size (not pathologic T category) and fewer metastatic lymph nodes than the open group, leading to an earlier distribution of the pathologic stage in the laparoscopic group.

Conclusions

LCTG for the treatment of GSC was safely conducted with fewer complications and mortalities than previously reported results. Advanced technologies and sophistication of laparoscopic skills may further yield minimal invasiveness with better short-term outcome.

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer compared with open gastrectomy: Single-center experience

The usefulness, safety and oncological validity of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) have not been widely reported.A total of 38 patients who underwent gastrectomy for RGC were enrolled at Wakayama Medical University Hospital between April 2008 and December 2018. All consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study; the patients were divided into the open gastrectomy group and the laparoscopic group according to the sequential nature of their operation. Fifteen patients underwent open gastrectomy for RGC (OGR) between April 2008 and December 2013, and 23 patients underwent LG for RGC (LGR) after 2014.In the OGR group, all initial operations were performed by open surgery, whereas in the LGR group, 11 patients (47%) initially underwent laparoscopic surgery and 12 patients (53%) initially underwent open surgery (P = .002), 3 patients of which (25%) converted to open gastrectomy. There was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissections or in operative time between the 2 groups, but blood loss was significantly lower in the LGR group than that in the OGR group (P = .002). Furthermore, although there was no difference between the 2 groups in C-reactive protein value on postoperative day 1, C-reactive protein value on postoperative day 3 was significantly lower in the LGR group than in the OGR group (P = .012). There were no differences in postoperative complications or long-term outcomes, including recurrence-free survival and overall survival.LGy is suitable in cases in which the initial surgery is performed by laparoscopic surgery. Even if the initial surgery is open surgery, it is oncologically equivalent to open gastrectomy and can be performed safely with less blood loss.

Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer: A Single-institution Experience and Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND/AIM

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of LTG with open total gastrectomy (OTG) for RGC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients who underwent total gastrectomy for RGC were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

LTG was carried out in seven patients, and OTG was performed in the remaining 15 patients. The mean operation time in the LTG group was longer than that in the OTG group. The estimated blood loss in the LTG group was less than that in the OTG group. No cases in the LTG group required open conversion. Postoperatively, the first meal and defecation were earlier in the LTG group than in the OTG group. The overall survival rates of the two groups were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a feasible surgical option for RGC.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for upper-middle advanced gastric cancer: analysis based on lymph node noncompliance

BACKGROUND

Increasing number of clinical studies have shown that laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D2 lymph node (LN) dissection is an effective method for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, reports on the technical feasibility and oncology efficacy of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in the treatment of AGC are rare.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the clinicopathologic data of 1313 patients with clinical stage of cT2-4aN0-3M0 undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 LN dissection from June 2007 to December 2013 was performed. Noncompliance was defined as patients with more than one LN station absence as described in the protocol for D2 lymphadenectomy in the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA). According to the literature, it was subdivided into LN compliance group (all LN stations were detected), minor LN noncompliance group (1-2 LN stations were not detected), major LN noncompliance group (more than 2 LN stations were not detected). Based on the LN noncompliance, the surgical indications of LTG were analyzed with LDG as control.

RESULTS

Among the 1313 patients, 197 (39.20%) patients and 321(39.71%) patients in the LDG group and the LTG group had minor LN noncompliance, 59(11.70%) patients and 163(20.10%) patients had major LN noncompliance. The difference in the extent of LN noncompliance between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). COX proportional hazards regression analysis elucidated that the LN noncompliance was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² and the history of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) were independent risk factors for major LN noncompliance in LTG group (p < 0.05), with which patients were defined as a LN noncompliance high-risk group. With the exception of LN noncompliance high-risk group, the difference in the extent of LN noncompliance between LTG group and LDG group was still statistically significant (p = 0.008). Tumor diameter > 60 mm is a preoperative risk factor for station #5 LN noncompliance, and no preoperative risk factors for station #6 LN noncompliance were found, with which patients were defined as LN noncompliance middle-risk group.

CONCLUSION

LN noncompliance is an independent prognostic factor for poor prognosis in patients after LTG. Based on this finding, patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², history of PAS and tumor diameter > 60 mm in the advanced stage of upper-middle gastric cancer represent high/middle-risk groups with LN noncompliance in LTG surgery, which should be carefully selected.

"Five-step" laparoscopic lymph node dissection for remnant gastric cancer following Billroth-II gastrectomy: A safe and feasible procedure

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery (LS) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is gaining interest [1-3]. However, due to adhesions to adjacent organs, displacement of anatomical structures, and changes in lymphatic flow triangulation, LS for RGC is considered challenging. In this study, we report our experience performing laparoscopic lymph node dissection for RGC following Billroth-II gastrectomy.

METHODS

The procedure was separated into five steps: (1) exploration and separation of adhesions and the greater omentum; (2) dissection of the lymph nodes (LNs) in the suprapancreatic area; (3) exposing the right side of the esophagus; (4) exposing the left gastroepiploic vessels and dissection of the LNs in the splenic hilar area; and (5) exposing the left side of the esophagus. The above procedure was performed for 45 RGC patients with stage cT1-4aN0/+ disease from January 2008 to June 2017.

RESULTS

There were no conversions to open surgery. The mean operation time was 195.0 ± 52.5 min, the mean blood loss was 104.3 ± 90.4 ml, and the mean times to first flatus, fluid diet, and soft diet were 3.6 ± 1.1 days, 4.5 ± 1.4 days, and 9.0 ± 5.1 days, respectively. A mean of 19.8 ± 12.7 LNs were retrieved. The overall postoperative morbidity rate, major postoperative morbidity [4] rate and mortality rate were 22.2%, 11.1%, and 0%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 47 months, the cumulative 3-year overall survival rate was 56.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel "five-step" laparoscopic lymph node dissection approach was technically safe and feasible in RGC patients following Billroth-II gastrectomy.

Current controversies in treating remnant gastric cancer: Are minimally invasive approaches feasible?

The incidence of remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is still increasing. Minimally invasive approaches including endoscopic resection, laparoscopic and robotic approaches, and function-preserving gastrectomy have been utilized as curative treatment methods for primary gastric cancer. However, adhesions and anatomical alterations due to previous gastrectomy make the use of minimally invasive approaches complicated and difficult for RGC. Application of these approaches for the treatment of RGC is still controversial. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a favorable alternative therapy for the resection of early gastric cancer that occurs in the remnant stomach and can prevent unnecessary complications. The majority of retrospective studies have shown that endoscopic submucosal dissection is an effective and oncologically safe treatment modality for RGC. Subtotal gastrectomy could serve as a function-preserving gastrectomy for patients with early RGC and improve postoperative late-phase function. However, there are only two studies that demonstrate the feasibility and oncological efficacy of subtotal gastrectomy for RGC. The non-randomized controlled trials showed that compared to open gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy for RGC led to better short-term outcomes and similar oncologic results. Because of the rarity of RGC, future multicenter studies are required to determine the indications of minimally invasive treatment for RGC.

Laparoscopic completion gastrectomy in elderly patients with remnant gastric cancer: a case series

Background

Open completion gastrectomy (OCG) has been selected to treat remnant gastric cancer (RGC) due to severe adhesions and difficulty recognizing anatomical orientation after primary gastrectomy. In general, elderly individuals’ physiological reserves gradually decrease. Moreover, elderly patients (EPs) often have multiple complicating factors (i.e., frailty and comorbidities), leading to more postoperative complications after abdominal surgery. Recently, several trials revealed the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for EPs with gastric cancer in early recovery. However, there are limited studies investigating the use of laparoscopic completion gastrectomy (LCG) for RGC in EPs. This study aims to assess the efficacy of LCG in EPs aged ≥ 70 years. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes of LCG with those of OCG.

Case presentation

Twenty-one EPs who underwent completion gastrectomy for RGC between 2007 and 2017 were enrolled and classified into two groups according to the surgical approach, namely the LCG (n = 6) and OCG (n = 15) groups. We adopted the G8 geriatric screening tool to comprehensively evaluate the EPs’ physical, mental, and social functions. Patient characteristics, clinicopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, and survival were retrospectively reviewed and compared between groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in the preoperative modified G8, indicating that the EPs’ backgrounds between the groups were comparable. Of note, blood loss during surgery was significantly reduced in the LCG group [median (range); LCG, 50 ml (20.0–65.0); OCG, 465 ml (264.5–714.0); p = 0.002]. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes in the LCG and OCG groups were 7 (range 4–10) versus 3 (range 1–6), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospitalization, intake of solid food, and Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications. In patients with a history of gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the LCG group, operative time tended to be longer in patients who underwent D2 lymph node dissection as primary surgery.

Conclusions

LCG was comparable to OCG for the treatment of RGC in EPs with significantly reduced blood loss. While LCG should be selected with caution in patients who have undergone D2 lymph node dissection as primary surgery, it could be considered as a surgical procedure in EPs with RGC.

Is Laparoscopic Approach Also Safe for the Treatment of Remnant Gastric Cancer?

The most important advantages of laparoscopic gastrectomy are the minimal invasiveness, including less postoperative pain, shorter recovery, and minimal complications. A laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is accepted widely as a standard treatment for gastric cancer. On the other hand, a laparoscopic total gastrectomy has not been popularized as a distal gastrectomy because of the complexity of a lymph node dissection and the diversity of reconstruction. In terms of laparoscopic surgery for a remnant gastrectomy, there are three key points, which are critical for safe operation: adequate lymph node dissection, meticulous adhesiolysis, and reconstruction. After radical surgery for gastric cancer, the intra-abdominal condition is greatly changed. In addition, the lymphatic anatomy around the stomach is broken and surgeons should be aware of a newly developed lymphatic system to perform adequate node dissection. An esophago-jejunal reconstruction is at risk of leakage. Until evidence that is more concrete can be obtained, experienced surgeons should consider the laparoscopic approach.

Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: A single-institution experience and systematic review of the literature

AIM

Application of laparoscopic approaches for the treatment of remnant gastric cancers (RGC) is still controversial. Therefore, in the present study, the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for RGC was investigated.

METHODS

A total of 27 patients who underwent gastrectomy for RGC from June 2008 to September 2017 were enrolled in this study. A comprehensive review of the literature on LG for RGC published before December 2017 using the PubMed database was carried out.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic gastrectomy was carried out in seven patients, and open gastrectomy (OG) was done in the remaining 20 patients. LG was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss (70 ± 71 vs. 1066 ± 1428 g; P < 0.001), significantly more retrieved lymph nodes (22 ± 13 vs. 12 ± 9; P = 0.03), a relatively lower postoperative complication rate, and a relatively shorter postoperative hospital stay than OG. A comprehensive review of the literature showed that LG for RGC was more likely to correlate with longer operative time, less blood loss, lower postoperative complication rate, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and more retrieved lymph nodes than OG.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcome of our patients with RGC and the literature indicated that a laparoscopic approach contributed to faster recovery after surgery than an open approach without sacrificing its radicality and was a safe and secure treatment option for RGC.

Transverse colon stenosis following laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric remnant carcinoma

Laparoscopic surgery for remnant gastric cancer has been reported in a limited number of cases, and data on post-operative complications are lacking. A 58-year-old male was admitted with remnant gastric cancer. He had undergone open subtotal gastrectomy 9 years ago for gastric cancer. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy was performed, and he was discharged on the 10^th day uneventfully. The patient had complained of nausea and vomiting in the 2^nd post-operative month. He clinically and radiologically diagnosed as ileus and required open emergency surgery. There was a transverse colon stenosis near the splenic flexure. Hartmann's procedure was done, and he was discharged on day 17. We have limited knowledge about colonic complications after laparoscopic gastric surgery. The development of stenosis in the transverse colon is one of these complications that should be kept in mind. As far as we know, such a complication has never been reported before.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: A single-institution experience

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of remnant gastric cancer is increasing because of past use of subtotal gastrectomy to treat peptic ulcer and increased survival rates after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The feasibility and advantages of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for remnant gastric cancer remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and clinical short-term outcomes of LTG for remnant gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer between April 2007 and October 2017 were divided into two groups: the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group and the LTG group. Clinicopathological data and short-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 31 remnant gastrectomies (23 OTG, 8 LTG) were performed. Blood loss was significantly lower in the LTG group than in the OTG group (135.5 vs 568.3 mL, P = 0.013). However, there was no significant difference in the operation time, days to food intake, or length of hospital stay between the two groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the postoperative complications, number of retrieved lymph nodes, or pathological findings. Two LTG patients (25.0%) required conversion to open surgery. There was no mortality in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

LTG for remnant gastric cancer can be a safe treatment option and may have an advantage of less blood loss than OTG.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) between elderly and non-elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using clinical and follow-up data from 168 patients treated with LTG for gastric cancer at our institution from January 2010 to December 2017. For this study, the short- and long-term outcomes (including tumor recurrence rate, disease-free survival rate, and overall survival rate) were compared between the elderly group (≥70 years) and non-elderly group (<70 years).

Results: The preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score and Charlson Comorbidity Index were higher in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group, while there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, and rate of conversion to laparotomy. The incidence of postoperative 30-day complications in the elderly group was higher than that in the non-elderly group due to a higher incidence of pulmonary infection, while the incidence of major complications was similar in both groups. The tumor recurrence rate was also similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of 5-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival rate.

Conclusions: LTG is safe and feasible for elderly patients with gastric cancer and is associated with relatively good long-term outcomes.

The Feasibility of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer

We compared laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer (LRG) with open gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer (ORG) to assess the safety and invasive nature of LRG. This study was a retrospective study. The study population consisted of 27 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer. Of these, 15 underwent ORG between January 2003 and April 2007, and 12 underwent LRG between May 2007 and January 2013. The operation time was not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, blood loss was significantly less in the LRG group than in the ORG group. No intraoperative blood transfusion was required. There was no significant difference in morbidity rate between the LRG (1/12, 8.3%) and ORG (4/15, 26.7%) groups, and no patients died in either group. Body temperature on postoperative day (POD) 7 (P = 0.034); systolic blood pressure on PODs 6 (P = 0.042) and 7 (P = 0.035); and heart rate on POD 7 (P = 0.049) were significantly lower in the LRG group than in the ORG group. No significant differences were observed in white blood cell count, or C-reactive protein and serum albumin levels between the groups. Serum total protein levels were significantly higher on POD 1 (P = 0.020), and the number of lymphocytes was significantly higher on POD 7 in the LRG group than in the ORG group (P = 0.036). Pain scores on POD 7 were significantly lower in the LRG group than in the ORG group (P = 0.033). LRG is a technically feasible and safe procedure.

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with a history of abdominal surgery

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer patients with a history of abdominal surgery (HAS).

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data collected from gastric cancer patients with HAS, who underwent LG between 2004 and 2015. We compared the clinicopathological features that correlated with conversion to open surgery and the development of severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification of grade III or higher).

RESULTS

Of the 41 patients identified, 6 (14.6%) required conversion to open surgery. The incidence of conversion to open surgery was associated with a history of lower gastrointestinal tract surgery (p = 0.009), attempted laparoscopic total gastrectomy (p = 0.002), and excessive blood loss (p < 0.001). Severe postoperative complications developed in six patients (14.6%). Although the development of complications was associated with high postoperative serum C-reactive protein, the type of past abdominal surgery was not significantly correlated with severe complications.

CONCLUSIONS

LG was feasible for gastric cancer patients with a HAS, but for those with a history of lower abdominal surgery or those who require total gastrectomy, surgeons should carefully consider the indications for LG.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: Risk factors associated with conversion and a systematic analysis of literature

BACKGROUND

In traditional opinion, history of abdominal surgery was the relative contraindication for Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) with high rate of conversion to Open gastrectomy (OG).Use of LG for treatment of remnant gastric cancer (RGC) has been documented in some case studies and controlled clinical trials. However, whether LG is superior, equal or inferior to OG in these patients is not clear.

METHODS

English language articles published between January 2005 and January 2016 were searched in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Main outcome measures were: conversion of LG to OG, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, tumor size, positive proximal resection margin, lymph node dissection, disease stage, post-operative resumption of oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, complications, mortality and follow-up findings. Published clinical data which was in the situation of conversion to OG was collected, and the factors associated with conversion to open surgery were examined.

RESULTS

Five non-randomized controlled trials and seven LG case studies were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis of the data could not be performed due to high variation and heterogeneity in study design, study population, LG technique, and outcome measures among the included studies. Systematic analysis of the included studies showed that LG was associated with significantly shorter mean operative time, early resumption of oral intake, and shorter hospital stay, as compared to that with OG. No significant difference in complications was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

LG in the hands of experienced surgeons is relative feasibility and safety for RGC. Previous surgical anastomosis, previous open surgery and surgical experience were associated with conversion to OG. However, these findings should be validated with robust prospective comparative studies.

A Case of Laparoscopic Resection for Carcinoma of the Gastric Remnant following Proximal Gastrectomy Reconstructed with Jejunal Interposition

A 72-year-old Japanese man had a history of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach in 2007. Our usual treatment strategy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach in 2007 was open proximal gastrectomy reconstructing by jejunal interposition with a 10 cm single loop. Upper gastrointestinal fiberscopy for annual follow-up revealed a type 0-IIc-shaped tumor with ulcer scar, 4.0 cm in size, located in the gastric remnant near the jejunogastrostomy. A clinical diagnosis of cancer of the gastric remnant, clinical T1b(SM)N0M0, Stage IA, following the proximal gastrectomy was made and a laparoscopic approach was selected because of the cancer's early stage. Remnant total gastrectomy with D1 plus lymphadenectomy was carried out with five ports by a pneumoperitoneal method. Complete resection of the reconstructed jejunum was undergone along with the jejunal mesentery. Reconstruction by the Roux-en-Y method via the antecolic route was selected. Total operative time was 395 min and blood loss was 40 mL. Our patient was the first successful case of resection for carcinoma of the gastric remnant following proximal gastrectomy reconstructed with jejunal interposition in a laparoscopic approach.

Current status in remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) and gastric stump cancer after distal gastrectomy (DG) are recognized as the same clinical entity. In this review, the current knowledges as well as the non-settled issues of RGC are presented. Duodenogastric reflux and denervation of the gastric mucosa are considered as the two main factors responsible for the development of RGC after benign disease. On the other hand, some precancerous circumstances which already have existed at the time of initial surgery, such as atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, are the main factors associated with RGC after gastric cancer. Although eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in remnant stomach is promising, it is still uncertain whether it can reduce the risk of carcinogenesis. Periodic endoscopic surveillance after DG was reported useful in detecting RGC at an early stage, which offers a chance to undergo minimally invasive endoscopic treatment or laparoscopic surgery and leads to an improved prognosis in RGC patients. Future challenges may be expected to elucidate the benefit of eradication of H. pylori in the remnant stomach if it could reduce the risk for RGC, to build an optimal endoscopic surveillance strategy after DG by stratifying the risk for development of RGC, and to develop a specific staging system for RGC for the standardization of the treatment by prospecting the prognosis.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: a comprehensive review and case series

BACKGROUND

Remnant gastric cancer is increasing with the earlier detection of gastric cancer and improved medical care. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer has been reported sporadically in association with the increased use of minimally invasive techniques. However, because of the rarity of remnant gastric cancer, the number of cases reported per study has been small. We therefore reviewed all published English-language reports, including our experience, to better characterize the technical aspects of currently used procedures.

METHODS

Ten patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant cancer between August 2005 and March 2014 were retrospectively studied. A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed database to identify English-language studies on laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer that were published before May 2014.

RESULTS

There was no conversion to open surgery. The mean operating time was 325 min, and mean intraoperative blood loss was 55 g. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 22, and mean postoperative hospital stay was 13 days. There was only one minor wound infection (overall morbidity rate, 10%). From the literature review, all comparative studies revealed that laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer required a longer operating time, and most studies reported less intraoperative blood loss, an equivalent number of harvested lymph nodes, and a shorter postoperative stay as compared with open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Proficiency in advanced laparoscopic surgical techniques, such as proper adhesiolysis and stable laparoscopic anastomosis, will allow laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer to be performed with satisfactory short-term results. This minimally invasive approach can be one treatment option for remnant gastric cancer.

Entirely Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Colectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer with Gastric Outlet Obstruction and Transverse Colon Invasion

It is well known that gastrectomy with curative intent is the best way to improve outcomes of patients with remnant gastric cancer. Recently,several investigators reported their experiences with laparoscopic gastrectomy of remnant gastric cancer. We report the case of an 83-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with remnant gastric cancer with obstruction. She underwent an entirely laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with colectomy because of direct invasion of the transverse colon. The operation time was 200 minutes. There were no postoperative complications. The pathologic stage was T4b (transverse colon) N0M0. Our experience suggests that laparoscopic surgerycould be an effective method to improve the surgical outcomes of remnant gastric cancer patients.

Risk factors for radical reoperation in patients with remnant gastric cancer

AIM: To identify the risk factors for radical reoperation in patients with remnant gastric cancer.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of clinical data for 60 patients with recurrent gastric stump cancer who underwent a second surgery from January 2009 to January 2015 at Ningxia Guyuan Hospital. Risk factors for radical reoperation were identified.

RESULTS: Of 60 patients, 26 (43.33%) were treated by radical surgery, 16 (26.67%) were treated by palliative surgery, 15 (25.00%) by gastric bypass surgery and jejunostomy, and 3 (5.00%) did not underwent surgery. Univariate analysis showed that age, gastrointestinal reconstruction, TNM stage at initial surgery, N stage at initial surgery, lymph node dissection, symptomatic recurrence, interval between recurrence and the second surgery, time to recurrence, adjuvant chemotherapy, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, low stomach acid, and histology were significantly associated with a second radical surgery (P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age > 60 years, N stage at initial surgery, TNM stage at initial surgery, symptomatic relapse, H. pylori infection, histological type and low stomach acid were independent risk factors for a second radical surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Age > 60 years, TMN stage III at initial surgery, N0 stage at initial surgery, symptomatic relapse, H. pylori infection, low acid and histological type are independent risk factors for a second radical surgery in patients with remnant gastric cancer.

Minimally invasive surgery for remnant gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery

BACKGROUND

Completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is technically challenging, especially using the minimally invasive approach. Only a few small case series have reported the technical feasibility of completion total gastrectomy by minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and open surgery for RGC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 76 completion total gastrectomies for RGC between 2005 and 2012. Indications for MIS were limited to no evidence of serosa invasion or lymph node metastasis to extraperigastric areas on preoperative evaluation. We compared patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, post-operative outcomes, and survival for the MIS and open surgery groups.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent completion total gastrectomy with MIS (10 laparoscopic, 8 robotic) and 58 patients underwent open surgery. Operation time was longer in the MIS than the open group (266 vs. 203 min, P = 0.004), but the groups had similar estimated blood loss, frequency of unplanned other organ resection, and number of retrieved lymph nodes. The MIS group had a significantly earlier initiation of soft diet, shorter hospital stay, and fewer pain medication injections. Complication rates, recurrence, and overall 5-year survival were similar for the two groups. When we compared laparoscopy with robotic, similar result was shown in all parameters except operation time.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to open surgery, MIS for RGC demonstrated better short-term outcome and comparable oncologic results. MIS for RGC is feasible and safe and maintains advantages of minimal invasiveness. Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches are reasonable to the management of RGC.