Effects of mesenchymal stem cell and fibroblast coating on immunogenic potential of prosthetic meshes in vitro

A global survey in the developmental landscape of possible vaccination strategies for COVID-19

The development of COVID-19 vaccines was promptly regulated to ensure the best possible approach. By January 2022, 75 candidates reached preclinical evaluation in various animal models, 114 vaccines were in clinical trials on humans, and 48 were in the final testing stages. Vaccine platforms range from whole virus vaccines to nucleic acid vaccines, which are the most promising in prompt availability and safety. The USA and Europe have approved vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNa1273). So far, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca-University of Oxford, Sinopharm, Sinovac Biotech Gamaleya, Bharat Biotech, and Novavax have documented effective vaccines. Even with technological advances and a fast-paced development approach, many limitations and problems need to be overcome before a large-scale production of new vaccines can start. The Key is to ensure equal and fair distribution globally through regulatory measures. Recent studies link Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination programs and lower disease severity.

Biomaterial Implants in Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair: A Review on the Importance of the Peritoneal Interface

Biomaterials have long been used to repair defects in the clinical setting, which has led to the development of a wide variety of new materials tailored to specific therapeutic purposes. The efficiency in the repair of the defect and the safety of the different materials employed are determined not only by the nature and structure of their components, but also by the anatomical site where they will be located. Biomaterial implantation into the abdominal cavity in the form of a surgical mesh, such as in the case of abdominal hernia repair, involves the contact between the foreign material and the peritoneum. This review summarizes the different biomaterials currently available in hernia mesh repair and provides insights into a series of peculiarities that must be addressed when designing the optimal mesh to be used in this interface.

Meshes in a mess: Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies for soft tissue reinforcement

Surgical meshes are frequently used for the treatment of abdominal hernias, pelvic organ prolapse, and stress urinary incontinence. Though these meshes are designed for tissue reinforcement, many complications have been reported. Both differentiated cell- and mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies have become attractive tools to improve their biocompatibility and tissue integration, minimizing adverse inflammatory reactions. However, current studies are highly heterogeneous, making it difficult to establish comparisons between cell types or cell coating methodologies. Moreover, only a few studies have been performed in clinically relevant animal models, leading to contradictory results. Finally, a thorough understanding of the biological mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cells in the context of foreign body reaction is lacking. This review aims to summarize in vitro and in vivo studies involving the use of differentiated and mesenchymal stem cells in combination with surgical meshes. According to preclinical and clinical studies and considering the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells, it is expected that these cells will become valuable tools in the treatment of pathologies requiring tissue reinforcement. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The implantation of surgical meshes is the standard procedure to reinforce tissue defects such as hernias. However, an adverse inflammatory response secondary to this implantation is frequently observed, leading to a strong discomfort and chronic pain in the patients. In many cases, an additional surgical intervention is needed to remove the mesh. Both differentiated cell- and stem cell-based therapies have become attractive tools to improve biocompatibility and tissue integration, minimizing adverse inflammatory reactions. However, current studies are incredibly heterogeneous and it is difficult to establish a comparison between cell types or cell coating methodologies. This review aims to summarize in vitro and in vivo studies where differentiated and stem cells have been combined with surgical meshes.

Nanoscience-Based Strategies to Engineer Antimicrobial Surfaces

Microbial contamination and biofilm formation of medical devices is a major issue associated with medical complications and increased costs. Consequently, there is a growing need for novel strategies and exploitation of nanoscience-based technologies to reduce the interaction of bacteria and microbes with synthetic surfaces. This article focuses on surfaces that are nanostructured, have functional coatings, and generate or release antimicrobial compounds, including "smart surfaces" producing antibiotics on demand. Key requirements for successful antimicrobial surfaces including biocompatibility, mechanical stability, durability, and efficiency are discussed and illustrated with examples of the recent literature. Various nanoscience-based technologies are described along with new concepts, their advantages, and remaining open questions. Although at an early stage of research, nanoscience-based strategies for creating antimicrobial surfaces have the advantage of acting at the molecular level, potentially making them more efficient under specific conditions. Moreover, the interface can be fine tuned and specific interactions that depend on the location of the device can be addressed. Finally, remaining important challenges are identified: improvement of the efficacy for long-term use, extension of the application range to a large spectrum of bacteria, standardized evaluation assays, and combination of passive and active approaches in a single surface to produce multifunctional surfaces.