Laparoscopic partial splenectomy is safe and effective in patients with focal benign splenic lesion

Transumbilical single-site laparoscopic treatment of primary splenic cyst in child: a rare case report and review of literature

Background

Splenic cysts are relatively rare benign tumors that are asymptomatic in most patients and are usually discovered incidentally by imaging. In our case, we report a splenic cyst in a child who underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy.

Case description

A 13-year-old boy was admitted to the hospital after an incidental finding of a splenic cyst on an abdominal ultrasound conducted 4 days prior. He was asymptomatic before admission. Upon admission, abdominal ultrasound and CT revealed a cystic lesion in the spleen, highly suspicious for a splenic cyst. Then, we used transumbilical single-site laparoscopic exploration and found a cyst measuring approximately 12 cm × 11 cm × 10 cm at the upper pole of the spleen, so we performed a partial splenectomy and diagnosed a primary epithelioid splenic cyst via postoperative pathology.

Conclusions

Splenic cysts in children are very rare and can be treated conservatively in asymptomatic patients with a diameter of less than 5 cm, while surgery is required in symptomatic patients or those with a diameter greater than or equal to 5 cm. Transumbilical single-site laparoscopic partial splenectomy is a minimally invasive and effective treatment, especially for children.

Ten-year experience of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for patients with splenic benign lesions

BACKGROUND

The increasing comprehension of spleen function has led to the gradual endorsement of laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) as a treatment option for benign spleen lesions. However, it is important to note that the LPS technique remains challenging. This study explores the standardized process and surgical techniques in LPS, aiming to promote the application of this technique.

METHODS

The clinical data of 20 patients with benign cystic or solid spleen lesions who underwent LPS at Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University were retrospectively collected. Data include age, gender, imaging data, surgical process, and postoperative complications. Additionally, the surgical techniques and standardization process were recorded in detail.

RESULTS

All 20 cases completed LPS without conversion to laparotomy or splenectomy. The surgical time was 162.25 ± 37.96 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 93.00 ± 58.40 mL, no blood products were transfused during the operations, and the removed volume of the spleen was about 34.75 ± 12.19 %. There were no postoperative complications such as intra-abdominal bleeding, intra-abdominal infection, pancreatic fistula, and residual splenic infarction. Postoperative pleural effusion occurred in four cases, and symptoms improved after symptomatic treatment. The postoperative hospital stay was 7.0 ± 1.4 days. There were no perioperative deaths. The residual splenic vessels were normal during the follow-up period, and no vascular embolism occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

LPS is a safe, feasible, and effective surgical method for patients with benign cystic or solid spleen lesions. Subsequently, mastering related surgical techniques and standardized surgical procedures can control the surgical risks in suitable cases, making LPS the standard procedure for treating benign spleen diseases.

Laparoscopic anatomical partial splenectomy for extremely rare isolated splenic lymphangioma in an adult: a case report and literature review

Background

Benign tumors of the spleen are rare compared to those of other parenchymal organs, accounting for less than 0.007% of all tumors, and are often found incidentally. Splenolymphangiomas are much rarer, commonly occur in children, and tend to have multiple foci. Splenic lymphangiomas are rare in adults, and fewer than 20 adult patients with isolated splenic lymphangiomas have been reported. In this article, we report the case of a middle-aged female patient with isolated splenic lymphangioma who underwent laparoscopic anatomical hypophysectomy of the lower pole of the spleen. We also summarize the existing literature on splenic lymphangioma diagnosis and available treatment options.

Case presentation

A 58-year-old middle-aged woman was found to have a mass approximately 60 mm in diameter at the lower pole of the spleen during a health checkup that was not accompanied by other symptoms or examination abnormalities. After completing a preoperative examination with no contraindications to surgery, the patient underwent laparoscopic anatomical splenectomy of the lower extremity of the spleen. The patient recovered well without complications and was discharged from the hospital on the 7th postoperative day. Histopathological and immunohistochemical results confirmed the diagnosis of splenic lymphangioma. Prompt surgical intervention is safe and necessary when splenic lymphangiomas are large or associated with a risk of bleeding.

Conclusion

Splenic lymphangiomas are rare and require early surgical intervention in patients with large tumor diameters or those at risk of rupture and bleeding. After rigorous preoperative evaluation and preparation, laparoscopic anatomical partial splenectomy is safe and feasible for surgeons with experience in laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for a giant splenic pseudocyst with elevated CA19-9: a case report

Introduction and importance

Currently, there is a lack of reliable evidence on the management of splenic cysts, which are rare. Exploring the efficacy of laparoscopic partial splenectomy can aid in the accumulation of treatment-related evidence.

Case presentation

Here, we report the case of a 31-year-old female who was diagnosed with a giant splenic cyst with elevated serum CA19-9 and subsequently underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy.

Clinical discussion

The effects of most treatment options for splenic cysts, including percutaneous aspiration and drainage, fenestration, and partial splenectomy, have not been confirmed by high-level evidence. With the development of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic partial splenectomy has drawn increasing attention. Additionally, the relationships between tumor markers and splenic cysts need to be further elucidated.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy might be recommended for patients with splenic cysts, especially when the cysts are not completely covered by the splenic parenchyma.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy in a patient with splenic hemangioma after distal gastrectomy for a neuroendocrine tumor

Herein, we report the case of a patient with splenic hemangioma after distal gastrectomy who was treated with laparoscopic partial splenectomy. A 64-year-old woman previously underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with regional lymph-node dissection for a gastric neuroendocrine tumor (G3) with venous infiltration and no lymph-node metastases. Periodic follow-up abdominal computed tomography revealed a well-defined, heterogeneous mass in the lower pole of the spleen 5 years after the operation, which grew from 12 to 19 mm 1 year later. A laparoscopic partial splenectomy was planned. During surgery, a smooth-surfaced mass with a lighter color than that of the surrounding area was observed at the lower pole of the spleen. The inferior polar branch of the splenic artery was transected, and the ischemic area of the lower pole of the spleen, where the tumor was present, was confirmed. First, the line used to perform splenic transection was determined using soft coagulation. The splenic parenchyma was then gradually transected using a vessel-sealing device system, and partial splenectomy was possible with almost no bleeding. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 8 without any complications. Pathological examination revealed a hemangioma without any malignant findings. Laparoscopic partial splenectomy is a safe and useful procedure that can be performed, considering the tumor size and location.

Robot-assisted resection of benign splenic tumors in children

PURPOSE

Robotic surgery is becoming increasingly widely used in the field of pediatric surgery. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted resection of benign pediatric splenic tumors and to discuss the technical points.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients who were diagnosed with benign splenic tumors and underwent minimally invasive surgery from January 2017 to September 2023 were included in the study. The clinical data including demographic criteria, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients underwent robot-assisted surgery, and 19 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The median operation time was 150 min, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 120 to 200 min for the robot-assisted group and 140 min with an IQR of 105 to 180 min in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.318). Despite four cases in the laparoscopic group (21%) being converted to laparotomy because of intraoperative bleeding, compared with none in the robot-assisted group, there was no significant difference between two groups (P = 0.128). The intraoperative volume of blood loss was significantly less (P = 0.041), and the hospitalization expense was significantly higher (P = 0.000) in the robot-assisted group than for the laparoscopic group. There was no significant difference in patients' age, tumor size, postoperative feeding time, and the postoperative hospitalization time between two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted benign splenic tumor resection was safe and feasible, and it reduced surgical trauma for the pediatric patient.

Laparoscopic management of benign splenic tumors in children

Background

The splenic tumor is relatively rare in children. However, diagnosing and managing this disease remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and pathological features of benign splenic tumors and to explore the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy in children.

Methods

The clinical data of all patients who were diagnosed with benign splenic tumors and admitted to our center between January 2014 and December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Factors that were documented included demographic criteria, clinical manifestations, preoperative examinations, surgical methods, histopathological characteristics, postoperative complications and outcomes.

Results

Totally, 24 consecutive patients with a mean age of 10.21±2.59 years were operated laparoscopically. Nine patients presented with recurrent abdominal pain, vomiting or backache. The remaining 15 cases were asymptomatic and were identified incidentally. Laparoscopic total splenectomy (LTS) was performed in 12 cases, laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) in 9 cases and deroofing of splenic cyst in 3 cases. No significant differences were observed in operation time, intraoperative bleeding and postoperative abdominal drainage between the LTS and LPS groups. Histopathology examination reported 12 cases of splenic epithelial cyst, 5 cases of splenic lymphangioma or lymphatic malformation, 3 cases of splenic hamartoma, 3 cases of splenic littoral cell angioma and 1 case of splenic hemangioma. No postoperative complications and tumor recurrence were observed.

Conclusions

It is still difficult to precisely diagnose the splenic tumor preoperatively. Laparoscopic splenectomy is safe and feasible in treating the benign splenic tumors, and partial splenectomy is of great significance in preserving the immune function in children.

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Splenectomy with Temporary Splenic Artery Occlusion in Pediatric Patients: The Experience in a Chinese Tertiary Children's Hospital

Background: The hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS) approach overcomes the difficulties experienced with conventional laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) with added advantages. In this study, we compared the HALS technique with standard LS based on the feasibility and intermediate postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients. Methods: We retrospectively investigated pediatric patients who underwent HALS or LS from October 2013 to May 2021 at the Children's Hospital, Chongqing Medical University. Potential parameters related to HALS or LS were explored, and the intermediate-term clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The quality of life and splenic regrowth data were followed up routinely for 12 months after the operation. Results: In total, 39 patients underwent splenectomy (11 for HALS and 28 for LS) and were eligible for this research. Patients who underwent HALS had a greater proportion of focal benign splenic lesions (P < .001) and partial splenectomy (P < .001). The HALS operative time was reduced compared with LS (P = .032). No operation conversion was noted in the HALS group, whereas 4 (14.3%) cases were converted to an open operation (P = .249). For partial splenectomies, favorable outcomes with HALS, including short operative time (P = .001) and reduced blood loss (P = .014), were noted compared with LS. No postoperative mortality was observed. During the follow-up period, a good quality of life and splenic regrowth were noted for most of the patients. Conclusions: Although another incision is necessary, HALS confers the advantages of a minimally invasive technique to manage the fragile spleen, especially in pediatric patients requiring partial splenectomy.

Clinical effect of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for both benign tumours and trauma-10 years of experience at a single institution

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to present our surgical experience in patients with benign tumour or trauma in spleen who underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) and to compare the results with those of patients who underwent an open partial splenectomy (OPS).

METHODS

We analysed the medical data of patients who underwent LPS or OPS between January 2010 and January 2020.

RESULTS

In total, 41 patients were enrolled. Nine patients underwent open surgery, 32 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The proportion of patients with tumours in the upper pole in LPS group was more than patients in OPS group. No difference was observed in estimated blood loss, allogeneic transfusion, postoperative stay, pathology and complications between LPS and OPS groups. The operation time in the LPS group (137.5 ± 30.8 min) was longer than that in the OPS group (88.3 ± 30.1 min) for patients with splenic traumatic rupture (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

LPS is an effective and safe spleen-preserving surgery as OPS. The advantages are small trauma, light pain and quick recovery. It is suitable for patients with benign tumours or trauma confined to one side of the spleen.

Minimally Invasive Partial Spleen Resection Preserving the Lower Pole in Children: A Technical Report on Feasibility and Safety

Background: Laparoscopic partial splenectomy is a surgical option for removing part of the spleen with a pathological mass in a way that ensures preservation of the spleen's physiological functions. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of this procedure, performed while preserving the blood supply from the left gastroepiploic artery, in children. Materials and Methods: Following institutional review board approval, this retrospective study was conducted on patients who, between January 2015 and December 2019, underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy with preservation of blood supply from the left gastroepiploic vessels. In the article, we described patient indications for surgery, surgical technique, surgery time, complications, and follow-up outcomes. Results: Eleven patients (mean age: 12.3 ± 3.4 years) underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy. Indications for surgery included nonparasitic cysts (n = 8), pseudocysts (n = 2), and hamartomas (n = 1). The mean benign mass diameter was 60 ± 22 mm. The mean operative time was 193.2 ± 55.1 minutes. The mean size of the retained lower pole was 31.1% ± 3.8%. There was no conversion to open splenectomy or any significant complication. The mean postoperative stay was 9 ± 0.7 days. No thrombosis of the splenic and portal veins was noted in the follow-up period, and no splenic remnant infarction occurred. Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial splenectomy with preservation of blood supply arising from the left gastroepiploic vessels seems to be safe in children. However, a larger study is needed to confirm our results.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open partial splenectomy in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

In order to avoid consequences of total splenectomy, partial splenectomy (PS) is increasingly reported. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic PS (LPS) and open PS (OPS) in children and adolescents.

AIM

To compare perioperative outcomes of patients with LPS and OPS.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, a total of 26 patients that underwent LPS or OPS between January 2008 and July 2018 were identified from the database of our tertiary referral center. In total, 10 patients had LPS, and 16 patients underwent OPS. Blood loss was calculated by Mercuriali’s formula. Pain scores, analgesic requirements and complications were assessed. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparison. To compare categorical variables, Fisher’s exact test was applied.

RESULTS

LPS was performed in 10 patients; 16 patients had OPS. Demographics (except for body mass index and duration of follow-up), indicating primary disease, preoperative spleen size and postoperative spleen volume, perioperative hematological parameters, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements, adverse events according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index, median time from operation to initiation of feeds, median time from operation to full feeds, median time from operation to mobilization and median length of hospital stay did not differ between LPS and OPS. Median (range) operative time (min) was longer in LPS compared to the OPS group [185 (135-298) vs 144 (112-270), respectively; P = 0.048]. Calculated perioperative blood loss (mL of red blood cell count) was higher in the LPS group compared to OPS [87 (-45-777) vs -37 (-114-553), respectively; P = 0.039].

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that compared outcomes of LPS and OPS. Both operative approaches had comparable perioperative outcomes. LPS appears to be a viable alternative to OPS.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy using the harmonic scalpel for parenchymal transection: two case reports and review of the literature

Laparoscopic splenectomy is nowadays widely performed for the treatment of benign and malignant diseases of the spleen. However, removing the spleen increases the risk of postoperative infections, therefore patients need long-life antibiotics. Advancement in surgical technique and instrumentation have led to the development of partial splenectomy, which is mainly indicated to treat localized lesions of the spleen. The main advantage is the preservation of the immune function, so that long-life prescription of antibiotics is no longer needed. The introduction of the laparoscopic approach to laparoscopic splenectomy seems to add further benefits, namely a faster recovery. We report two cases of benign splenic cysts, which were treated by laparoscopic partial splenectomy. Technical aspects on the parenchymal transection and data from the most recent literature are discussed as well.

Partial Splenectomy for a Sizeable Cavernous Hemangioma: Case Report and a Review of the Literature

The recent awareness of the spleen's important role, especially its immune function, has fundamentally changed the management of splenic diseases, promoting the splenic preserving surgery, and protecting from the significant risk of total splenectomy: overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis. Partial splenectomy is a safe and feasible technique that offers, according to the literature, the same results of a total approach, either in achieving hematological benefits in congenital hemolytic anemia, or treating the focal splenic lesion such as hemangioma, while preserving the immune function.

Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: A Critical Appraisal of an Emerging Technique. A Review of the First 457 Published Cases

Background: Laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) may allow avoiding total splenectomy (TS) complications and maximizing the advantages of mini-invasive approach. The objective of this review is to assess feasibility and safety of LPS, to compare this approach with alternative options. Materials and Methods: A literature review of articles reporting LPS is performed. Several parameters, including age, indication, surgical technique, devices used for splenic section/hemostasis, adverse outcomes, including morbidity/mortality, conversions to open surgery, conversions to TS, operative time (OT), and hospital stay (HS), are analyzed. Articles comparing LPS' results with those of open partial splenectomy and laparoscopic TS are also analyzed. Results: Fifty-nine articles reporting 457 LPS were included. Patients' characteristics varied widely, concerning age and indications, including hematological disease (hereditary spherocytosis, drepanocytosis), splenic focal masses, and trauma. Several technical options are reported. Mean OT and HS are 128 ± 43.7 minutes and 4.9 ± 3.8 days, respectively. No mortality and 5.7% morbidity are reported. Conversion rates to open surgery and to TS are 3.9% and 3.7%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion LPS is feasible and safe, with no mortality, low morbidity, and low conversion rates to laparotomy and to TS. LPS may be accomplished by various techniques and tools. Major complications are sporadically reported, thus potential risks should not be underestimated.

Treatment options for sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of spleen

BACKGROUND

To summarise the clinical features of Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen and to compare the efficacy of three different surgical treatments.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with SANT of spleen treated at our center from 2009 to 2018. We compared the efficacy and safety of three different types of surgical procedures. ANOVA and the chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients were included. Most (35/37; 94.6%) were asymptomatic. A number presented as obscure boundary lesions such that malignancy could not be excluded. Open splenectomy was performed for 12 patients, laparoscopic splenectomy for 12 patients and laparoscopic partial splenectomy for 13 patients. Operation time (P = 0.355), blood loss (P = 0.135), length of hospital stay after operation (P = 0.271) and postoperative complications (P = 0.502) were comparable between the three groups. Duration of drainage tube placement was significantly longer in laparoscopic partial splenectomy patients (P = 0.006). Peak platelet count after operation was significantly lower in laparoscopic partial splenectomy patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy appears to be a technically feasible and therapeutically effective approach for SANT.

Laparoscopic near-total splenectomy. Report of a case

•

We describe a case report of near total splenectomy managed by laparoscopy for a large lesion of the upper pole of the spleen.

•

When total splenectomy is performed, an increased risk of potentially lethal infections arises. Asplenia and impaired splenic function are related to the increase of morbidity and mortality from infectious complications.

•

The overwhelming post splenectomy infections (OPSI) are mostly represented by fulminating sepsis, meningitis or pneumonia.

•

laparoscopic near total splenectomy is an innovative partial splenectomy technique consisting on preserving a residual spleen volume.

•

The comparison between other spleen preserving techniques shows that LNTS is associated with a lower rate of secondary surgery and postoperative recurrence of anaemia.

Introduction

Splenectomy is a surgical procedure indicated for the treatment of most benign and malignant splenic diseases, especially hematologic disorders. Laparoscopic approach is preferable to the open surgery for most indications because it reduces intra- and post-operative complications and shortens hospital stay. Laparoscopic approach is also feasible for partial splenectomy. Spleen-preserving techniques reduce the risk of severe infections and thromboembolic events that can occur after total splenectomy

Case presentation

We report a case of a 50-year old woman with an incidentally discovered voluminous lesion in the superior pole of spleen. A laparoscopic near-total splenectomy was performed.

Discussion

The evidence about the potential complications in splenectomised patients speaks in favour of performing spleen-sparing surgical techniques whenever possible. Most common indications for laparoscopic partial splenectomy are non-parasitic splenic cystic, benign splenic tumors, splenic haematological diseases, non-cystic intraparenchymal lesions, spleen rupture, splenic abscess, vascular abnormalities. Laparoscopic near total splenectomy is an innovative partial splenectomy technique consisting on preserving a residual spleen volume.

Conclusion

LNTS seems to be a safe and effective technique for the management of benign spleen diseases. The comparison between other spleen preserving techniques shows that LNTS is associated with a lower rate of secondary surgery and postoperative recurrence of anaemia.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for splenic lymphangioma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Lymphangioma is a benign malformation of the lymphatic system and is often found in the neck and axilla, the orbit, the mediastinum, etc. However, isolated splenic lymphangioma is a rare disease in young women, and its treatment is controversial. We report a case of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for isolated splenic lymphangioma in a young woman.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 18-year-old woman with mild epigastralgia was admitted to a nearby hospital. Abdominal ultrasound detected a 6-cm mass confined to the upper pole of the spleen; thereafter, she was referred to our department for surgical treatment. Although a benign tumor, we decided to resect it because of her symptoms. To preserve part of the normal spleen, laparoscopic partial splenectomy was performed with a co-axial approach using four ports and a liver retractor in the lithotomy position. After dissection around the spleen hilum, we identified that the tumor was being fed from the splenic vessels of the upper pole and severed the branch. Postoperatively, the patient showed no complications and was discharged on postoperative day 8 without symptoms. Pathological examination revealed splenic lymphangioma, which is rare in young women. No recurrence was seen 1 year after surgery, and a computed tomography scan showed no problems with the remaining spleen.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for a young woman with an isolated splenic lymphangioma, we determined that laparoscopic partial splenectomy is a safe, effective, and valuable option for the treatment of benign splenic tumors.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy with temporary occlusion of the trunk of the splenic artery in fifty-one cases: experience at a single center

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) for splenic benign space-occupying lesions has been reported by many researchers; however, few studies have described methods to control intraoperative bleeding. Trustworthy experience in LPS with a satisfactory intraoperative hemorrhage control technique is therefore necessary. The current study aims to present our experience in LPS with temporary occlusion of the trunk of the splenic artery for controlling intraoperative bleeding with a large sample of 51 cases and to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and reproducibility of this technique.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients from August 2014 to April 2019 who underwent LPS in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical techniques were described in detail.

RESULTS

All patients had successfully undergone LPS with temporary occlusion of the trunk of the splenic artery. Conversions to open surgery, hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomies, or blood transfusions were not needed. The operative time was 94.75 ± 18.91 min, the estimated blood loss was 71.13 ± 53.87 ml, and the volume of resected spleen was 34.75 ± 12.19%. The range of postoperative stays was 4-14 days. One female patient (2%, 1/51) suffered from postoperative complications. No perioperative mortality, incision infections, postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs), splenic infarctions, or portal/splenic vein thromboembolic events occurred.

CONCLUSION

LPS is an effective spleen-preserving surgery. Although there are many other bleeding control methods, temporarily occluding the trunk of the splenic artery was found to be a safe, feasible, and reproducible technique in LPS. The outcomes of this technique and the efficacy of splenic parenchyma preservation are acceptable.

Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) is a challenging procedure. The aim of this review was to evaluate its feasibility, safety, and potential benefits.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review for the years 1995-2018 to retrieve all relevant articles.

RESULTS

A total of 44 studies with 252 patients undergoing LPS were reviewed. Six studies described combined operations. Ranges of operative time and estimated blood loss were 50-225 min and 0-1200 ml, respectively. There are eight patients need blood transfusion in 231 patients with available data. The conversion rate was 3.6% (9/252). Overall, 27 patients (10.7%;27/252) developed postoperative or intraoperative complications. Overall mortality was 0% (0/252). The length of postoperative stay (POS) varied (1-11 days). Among four comparative studies, one showed LPS could reduce POS than laparoscopic total splenectomy (LTS) (LTS 5.4 ± 1.8 days, LPS 4.2 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.027) and complications (pleural effusion (LTS 9/22, LPS 0/15, p = 0.005), splenic vein thrombosis (LTS 10/22, LPS 0/15, p = 0.002)). Another comparative study showed LPS may benefit emergency patients. However, one comparative study showed LPS was associated with more pain, longer time to oral intake, and longer POS in children with hereditary spherocytosis. The fourth comparative study showed robotic subtotal splenectomy was comparable to laparoscopy in terms of POS and complication. The main benefits were lower blood loss, vascular dissection time, and a better evaluation of splenic remnant volume.

CONCLUSIONS

In early series of highly selected patients, LPS appears to be feasible and safe when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Partial splenectomy: Who, when and how. A systematic review of the 2130 published cases

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

In order to avoid consequences of total splenectomy (including severe postsplenectomy sepsis), partial splenectomy (PS) is increasingly reported. Without guidelines and indications concerning a rarely-indicated procedure, a review of literature should be an asset.

METHODS

A systematic review of all PSs from 1960 to December 2017 was performed, with special focus on surgical indications, sites of resection, approaches and techniques of vascular dissection and parenchymal section/hemostasis of the spleen, perioperative morbidity/mortality, including complications compelling to perform total splenectomy.

RESULTS

Among 2130 PSs, indications for resection were hematological disease in 1013 cases and nonhematological conditions in 1078, including various tumors in 142 and trauma in 184. Parenchymal transection was performed using several techniques through the years, most frequently after having induced partial ischemia by splenic hilum vascular dissection/ligation. 371 laparoscopic/robotic PSs were reported. Rescue total splenectomy was required in 75 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although good results are probably overestimated by such a retrospective review, PS should be considered as a procedure associated with a low morbidity/mortality. Nevertheless, severe complications are also reported, and the need of total splenectomy should not to be minimized. Laparoscopic/robotic procedures are increasingly performed, with good results and rare conversions.

TYPE OF STUDY

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: A Safe and Feasible Treatment for Splenic Benign Lesions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic partial splenectomy in treating splenic benign lesions (SBL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 16 SBL patients clearly diagnosed before surgery (8 cases of splenic cysts, 5 cases of splenic lymphangioma, and 3 cases of splenic hemangioma) underwent 2D or 3D laparoscopic partial splenectomy from October 2013 to August 2016. The diameters of the SBL were 5 to 17 cm with an average of 8.7 cm; 12 cases were located in the upper pole of the spleen, and 4 cases were located in the lower pole of the spleen.

RESULTS

All 16 patients successfully completed laparoscopic partial splenectomy, and no patients required conversion to an open operation. There were 3 cases of resection using the 3D laparoscope. There were 14 cases of resection of half of the spleen and 2 cases of partial resection of the lower spleen. The operation time was 110 to 195 minutes with an average time of 157 minutes. The amount of intraoperative blood loss was 80 to 200 mL, and no patients required blood transfusion. The postoperative abdominal drainage time was 3 to 5 days, and no abdominal bleeding, pancreatic leakage, subphrenic infection, or other complications occurred; the postoperative hospital stay lasted 5 to 6 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy is safe and feasible for the treatment of splenic benign lesions.

Partial splenectomy: A case series and systematic review of the literature

Backgrounds/Aims

Partial splenectomy (PS) is a surgical option for splenic mass, in order to reduce postoperative complications and preserve the splenic function. Despite this, data in literature is still scarce. The present study aimed to reveal our recent experience and provide a comprehensive overview of the feasibility and complications related to various surgical approaches.

Methods

Data of patients who underwent PS, between 2014 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Literature was searched for studies reporting all types of PS in adult or adolescent patients.

Results

Five PS were performed in our department: two (40%) by laparoscopy and three (60%) by laparotomy. Two (40%) postoperative complications were detected, and in one of them, total splenectomy (TS) by laparotomy was finally required. There were no deaths or complications at last follow-up. Twenty studies including 213 patients were identified in the literature search. The rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was 3% (range, 5–50%) and in 3% of cases (range, 7–10%) PS was converted into total TS and the overall morbidity rate was 8% (range, 5–25%). In comparison to laparotomy, the conversion rate of laparoscopic approach to TS was 3.5% (vs. 1.4%) and a morbidity rate of 9.8% (vs. 4.3%).

Conclusions

The present review shows that PS is a viable procedure in selected cases. The mini-invasive approach seemed to be feasible despite the presence of higher rate of complications than the open technique. In future, further studies on this topic are needed by involving more patients. Furthermore, it is proposed that the development of robotic surgery could make this approach the new gold-standard technique for spleen-preserving surgery.

Feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: A retrospective analysis

The increased awareness of asplenia-related life-threatening complications has led to the development of parenchyma sparing splenic resections in past few years. The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) in selected emergency patients.From January 2013 to December 2015, there were 46 emergency patients, diagnosed with splenic rupture, admitted in our department. Selection criteria for LPS: (1) Preoperative CT scan revealed single pole rupture without spleen pedicle injury; (2) BP>90/60 mm Hg and heart rates <120 bpm; (3) No sigh of multiple organ injury. Eventually, LPS was performed in 21 patients (Group LPS), while laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) was performed in 20 patients (Group LS).The main cause of splenic rupture was traffic accident, followed by blunt injury and high falling injury. Abdominal CT scan showed the mean longitudinal diameter of spleen of group LPS was 14.2 ± 1.8 cm (range 12-17 cm), while the size of remnant spleen was 5.5 ± 1.2 cm. Between 2 groups, operation time (LPS: 122.6 ± 17.2 min vs LS: 110.5 ± 18.7 minutes, P = .117), and intraoperative blood loss (LPS: 174 ± 22 mL vs LS: 169 ± 29 mL, P = .331) were similar. There were 2 patients suffered subsequent unstable vital sign altering during mobilization when performing LPS. Conversion to LS (2/21, 9.52%) was decided and successfully completed. Although there was no patient suffered postoperative OPSI or thrombocytosis events in both groups after 6-month follow-up, the mean platelets and leukocyte count were significantly lower in group LPS. Splenic regrowth was evaluated in 20 patients of group LPS. And the mean regrowth of splenic volume reached 19% (10%-26%).Due to its minimal invasive effect and functional splenic tissue preservation, LPS may be a safe and feasible approach for emergency patients. And prospective trials with clear inclusion criteria are needed to proof the benefit of LPS.

[Robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial splenectomy for nonparasitic cysts]

21 patients with nonparasitic spleen cysts were operated. Robot-assisted (RA) interventions were applied in 10 cases, laparoscopic--in 11 patients. Men surgery duration was 124 minutes in case of RA-technique and 120 minutes if laparoscopy was used. Blood loss was significantly lower in the group of RA resection (p=0.035). There were no conversions of access in the group of RA-operations while in group of laparoscopy conversion has been required in 1 case. We did not observe complications in case of RA-surgeries. Laparoscopic method was associated with 2 complications (left-sided hydrothorax and fluid accumulation in resection area). Postoperative hospital-stay did not differ in both groups and was 7.1 and 6.4 room-nights in case of RA-interventions and laparoscopy respectively. There were no deaths. Indications for robot-assisted partial splenectomy for nonparasitic cysts include location of mass in upper pole or hilus of spleen, its diameter more than 8 cm, body mass index more than 30 and splenomegaly. Lower pole resection and splenectomy are more advisable using laparoscopic method.