1
|
Lin H, Baker JW, Meister K, Lak KL, Martin Del Campo SE, Smith A, Needleman B, Nadzam G, Ying LD, Varban O, Reyes AM, Breckenbridge J, Tabone L, Gentles C, Echeverri C, Jones SB, Gould J, Vosburg W, Jones DB, Edwards M, Nimeri A, Kindel T, Petrick A. American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery: intra-operative care pathway for minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2024; 20:895-909. [PMID: 39097472 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical care pathways help guide and provide structure to clinicians and providers to improve healthcare delivery and quality. The Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Committee (QIPS) of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) has previously published care pathways for the performance of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and pre-operative care of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). OBJECTIVE This current RYGB care pathway was created to address intraoperative care, defined as care occurring on the day of surgery from the preoperative holding area, through the operating room, and into the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). METHODS PubMed queries were performed from January 2001 to December 2019 and reviewed according to Level of Evidence regarding specific key questions developed by the committee. RESULTS Evidence-based recommendations are made for care of patients undergoing RYGB including the pre-operative holding area, intra-operative management and performance of RYGB, and concurrent procedures. CONCLUSIONS This document may provide guidance based on recent evidence to bariatric surgeons and providers for the intra-operative care for minimally invasive RYGB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Lin
- Department of Surgery, Signature Healthcare, Brockton, Massachusetts.
| | - John W Baker
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - Kathleen L Lak
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - April Smith
- Department of Pharmacy, Creighton University School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | - Geoffrey Nadzam
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lee D Ying
- Department of Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Oliver Varban
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Angel Manuel Reyes
- Department of General Surgery, St. Michael Medical Center, Silverdale, Washington
| | - Jamie Breckenbridge
- Department of General Surgery, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, Virginia
| | - Lawrence Tabone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Charmaine Gentles
- Department of Surgery, Northshore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York
| | | | - Stephanie B Jones
- Department of Anesthesiology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Jon Gould
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Wesley Vosburg
- Department of Surgery, Grand Strand Medical Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
| | - Daniel B Jones
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | | | - Abdelrahman Nimeri
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tammy Kindel
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Anthony Petrick
- Department of Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Samad M, Sutherland M, Ganier D, Broussard D, Koveleskie J, Nossaman VE, Nossaman BD. Perioperative efficiency of sugammadex following minimally invasive gastric sleeve surgery: A superiority trial. J Perioper Pract 2024:17504589241267859. [PMID: 39133158 DOI: 10.1177/17504589241267859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have proposed that the routine use of sugammadex could provide perioperative time savings and a reduction in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of sugammadex on perioperative times and on the incidences of adverse events when compared with the active control, neostigmine, for minimally invasive gastric sleeve surgery. METHODS Following institutional review board approval, patient characteristics, type of primary neuromuscular blocking reversal agents, operating room discharge times, post-anaesthesia care unit recovery times, and incidences of and treatment for postoperative nausea and vomiting and orotracheal reintubation were the measures of interest. Superiority testing determined the between-group means differences of the reversal agents on the two perioperative time periods of interest. RESULTS Superiority testing demonstrated no improvement of the two perioperative times with sugammadex. There was no clinical difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting or in the number of antiemetic doses received in the post-anaesthesia care unit between the two groups. Finally, the two orotracheal reintubations in the post-anaesthesia care unit were in the sugammadex administered group. CONCLUSION These results with sugammadex provide no perioperative time savings or reduce the incidence and treatment for postoperative nausea and vomiting in the post-anaesthesia care unit when compared with neostigmine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mawadah Samad
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Macey Sutherland
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Donald Ganier
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - David Broussard
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Joseph Koveleskie
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Vaughn E Nossaman
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Bobby D Nossaman
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trauzeddel RF, Leitner M, Dehé L, Nordine M, Piper SK, Habicher M, Sander M, Perka C, Treskatsch S. Goal-directed fluid therapy using uncalibrated pulse contour analysis and balanced crystalloid solutions during hip revision arthroplasty: a quality implementation project. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:281. [PMID: 37024966 PMCID: PMC10078091 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03738-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To implement a goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) protocol using crystalloids in hip revision arthroplasty surgery within a quality management project at a tertiary hospital using a monocentric, prospective observational study. METHODS Adult patients scheduled for elective hip revision arthroplasty surgery were screened for inclusion in this prospective study. Intraoperatively stroke volume (SV) was optimized within a previously published protocol using uncalibrated pulse contour analysis and balanced crystalloids. Quality of perioperative GDFT was assessed by protocol adherence, SV increase as well as the rate of perioperative complications. Findings were then compared to two different historical groups of a former trial: one receiving GDFT with colloids (prospective colloid group) and one standard fluid therapy (retrospective control group) throughout surgery. Statistical analysis constitutes exploratory data analyses and results are expressed as median with 25th and 75th percentiles, absolute and relative frequencies, and complication rates are further given with 95% confidence intervals for proportions using the normal approximation without continuity correction. RESULTS Sixty-six patients underwent GDFT using balanced crystalloids and were compared to 130 patients with GDFT using balanced colloids and 130 controls without GDFT fluid resuscitation. There was a comparable increase in SV (crystalloids: 65 (54-74 ml; colloids: 67.5 (60-75.25 ml) and total volume infused (crystalloids: 2575 (2000-4210) ml; colloids: 2435 (1760-3480) ml; and controls: 2210 (1658-3000) ml). Overall perioperative complications rates were similar (42.4% (95%CI 30.3-55.2%) for crystalloids and 49.2% (95%CI 40.4-58.1%) for colloids and lower compared to controls: 66.9% (95%CI 58.1-74.9)). Interestingly, a reduced number of hemorrhagic complications was observed within crystalloids: 30% (95%CI 19.6-42.9); colloids: 43% (95%CI 34.4-52.0); and controls: 62% (95%CI 52.6-69.9). There were no differences in the rate of admission to the post-anesthesia care unit or intensive care unit as well as the length of stay. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative fluid management using a GDFT protocol with crystalloids in hip revision arthroplasty surgery was successfully implemented in daily clinical routine. Perioperative complications rates were reduced compared to a previous management without GDFT and comparable when using colloids. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01753050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R F Trauzeddel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Leitner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - L Dehé
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Nordine
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - S K Piper
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Habicher
- Department of Anesthesiology, Operative Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Straße 7, 35392, Gießen, Germany
| | - M Sander
- Department of Anesthesiology, Operative Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Straße 7, 35392, Gießen, Germany
| | - C Perka
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Virchow-Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Treskatsch
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society published guidelines for bariatric surgery reviewing the evidence and providing specific care recommendations. These guidelines emphasize preoperative nutrition, multimodal analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, anesthetic technique, nutrition, and mobilization. Several studies have since evaluated these pathways, showing them to be safe and effective at decreasing hospital length of stay and postoperative nausea and vomiting. This article emphasizes anesthetic management in the perioperative period and outlines future directions, including the application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery principles in patients with extreme obesity, diabetes, and metabolic disease and standardization of the pathways to decrease heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa L Riley
- Fellow, Surgical Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Penn Medicine, 6 Dulles, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Anesthesiologist & Intensivist, Department of Anesthesiology, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Orhon Ergun M, Zengin SU, Umuroglu T. Goal-Directed Fluid Management Using Plethysmographic Variability Index in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care 2021. [DOI: 10.1089/bari.2021.0075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Meliha Orhon Ergun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Pendik Research and Training Hospital, Marmara University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Seniyye Ulgen Zengin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Pendik Research and Training Hospital, Marmara University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tumay Umuroglu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Pendik Research and Training Hospital, Marmara University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seip RL, Lee S, McLaughlin T, Staff I, Nsereko A, Thompson S, Santana C, Tishler DS, Papasavas P. Utility of a Novel Scale to Assess Readiness for Discharge After Bariatric Surgery. World J Surg 2021; 46:172-179. [PMID: 34668048 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06324-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safe release of a patient from hospital care after bariatric surgery depends upon the achievement of satisfactory health status. Here, we describe a new objective scale (the Readiness for Discharge, RFD Scale) to measure the patient's suitability for hospital discharge after bariatric surgery. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, observational analysis of data collected in a randomized clinical trial of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy from 3/15/2018 to 1/12/2019. Nursing staff assessed 122 patients every 4-8 h after surgery using a checklist to document 5 components: ambulation, vital signs, pain, nausea, and oral intake of clear fluid. Satisfaction of each component was scored as "1" (satisfactory) or "0" (not satisfactory). Scores were summed and analyzed for patterns. RFD = 5 marked the patient as ready for discharge. RESULTS Sufficient intake of clear liquid was the last RFD component satisfied in 87% of patients. Two overall response patterns emerged: "Steady Progressors" (n = 51) whose RFD score rose steadily from 0 to 5 without reversion to a lower score; and "Oscillators" (n = 71) who had at least one temporary decrease in RFD score on the way to attaining 5, or showed a simultaneous oscillation of components without change in RFD. CONCLUSIONS The RFD checklist allows objective scoring of medical readiness for discharge after LSG and has the potential to improve clinical communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L Seip
- Hartford Hospital Surgical Weight Loss Program, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06102, US
| | - Samantha Lee
- Hartford Hospital Surgical Weight Loss Program, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06102, US
| | - Tara McLaughlin
- Hartford Hospital Department of Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06102, US
| | - Ilene Staff
- Hartford Hospital Research Program, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06106, US
| | - Aloys Nsereko
- Hartford Hospital Surgical Weight Loss Program, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06102, US
| | - Stephen Thompson
- Hartford Hospital Research Program, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06106, US
| | - Connie Santana
- Hartford Hospital Surgical Weight Loss Program, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06102, US
| | - Darren S Tishler
- Hartford Hospital Surgical Weight Loss Program, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06102, US
| | - Pavlos Papasavas
- Hartford Hospital Surgical Weight Loss Program, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06102, US.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Keeth S, D'Errico E, Champlin AM. A Nurse-Led Evidence-Based Practice Protocol to Reduce Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in the Bariatric Surgery Patient. J Perianesth Nurs 2020; 35:574-579. [PMID: 32732001 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2020.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To create and implement a standard care bundle to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the bariatric surgery patient. DESIGN Evidence-based quality improvement project. METHODS A pre- and postintervention chart review identified high-risk indicators for PONV in patients with longer lengths of stay (LOS), which led to the development of targeted care bundle components. FINDINGS A clinically significant difference was observed in predicted PONV for Apfel scores 3 and 4 in patients receiving the full bundle compared with those receiving a partial bundle. Decreased LOS after implementation of the antiemetic care bundle was found. Health care provider compliance with bundle administration was low (57%). CONCLUSIONS Clinically significant PONV scores were low after implementation of the antiemetic bundle for high-risk patients. The nurse-led creation and implementation of an antiemetic care bundle may have contributed to decreased LOS, reduced PONV, and reduced provider variability in care management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Keeth
- Surgical Services, VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA.
| | - Ellen D'Errico
- School of Nursing, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evaluate the safety of fast track (FT) surgery program in patients undergoing primary and revisional bariatric surgery (conversion from one procedure to another); identify limiting factors for early discharge and predictive factors for readmission. METHODS This is a retrospective review of 730 consecutive morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery between January 2016 and December 2017. Fast track protocol was applied on all patients. Target discharge was after one-night stay. The primary end point is length of stay. The secondary end point is frequency of hospital contact after discharge, readmissions and reinterventions within 30 days. RESULTS Primary procedures (n = 633) were banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (BRYGB, 79.3%), sleeve gastrectomy (10.7%), gastric band (4.7%) and others (5.3%). Mean age (± SD) was 44.32 ± 11.26 years, and mean BMI (± SD) was 43.58 ± 6.12 kg/m2. Conversion procedures (n = 97) were gastric band to BRYGB (40.2%), or to adjustable BRYGB (39.2%), Mason to BRYGB (11.3%), sleeve to BRYGB (4.1%) and others (5.2%). Mean age (± SD) was 47.22 ± 9.1 years, and mean BMI (± SD) was 37.9 ± 7.27 kg/m2. Mean LOS in primary patients was 1.3 ± 0.99, and that in conversion patients was 1.5 ± 1.4. Successful discharge at one night or less was achieved in 650 cases (573 primary and 77 conversion). After one-night discharge, incidence of contact to the hospital, readmission and reintervention was 23.9%, 5.9% and 1.9%, in the primary group and 31.2%, 13% and 5.2% in the conversion group. CONCLUSION One-night discharge in FT managed conversion procedures is safe, compared to primary procedures. It is associated with higher readmission rates; however, the postdischarge hospital contacts and surgical complications were not statistically significant different.
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith M, Nossaman B. A Dose-Response Analysis of Crystalloid Administration during Esophageal Resection. South Med J 2019; 112:412-418. [PMID: 31282973 DOI: 10.14423/smj.0000000000000991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the role of intraoperative crystalloid administration on postoperative hospital length of stay (phLOS) and on the incidence of previously reported adverse events in 100 consecutive patients who underwent esophageal resection. METHODS The role of previously reported patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and intraoperative crystalloid administration on the duration of phLOS underwent statistical screening criteria for multivariable analysis, including the use of an instrumental variable to measure the role of unmeasured confounders on phLOS. Tests to assess the likelihood of causality also were performed. RESULTS When the volumes of intraoperative crystalloids were expressed as dose-response relationships to outcomes, progressive decreases in phLOS, variances in phLOS, and the incidences of unplanned surgical intensive care unit admission, postoperative pneumonia, respiratory failure requiring orotracheal intubation, nonsinus cardiac dysrhythmias, and anastomotic leak were observed. Intraoperative transfusion of packed red blood cells greatly increased the duration of phLOS, which was not associated with estimated blood loss, length of surgical operation, or unplanned surgical intensive care unit admission. Instrumental variable analysis revealed no significant influence on phLOS. Causality tests supported the role of intraoperative crystalloid administration in reducing the duration and variance of phLOS. CONCLUSIONS A dose-response relationship was clinically observed between intraoperative crystalloid administration and the duration and variance of phLOS and with commonly reported postoperative adverse events. Intraoperative transfusion of packed red blood cells greatly increased phLOS that was not associated with the severity of the surgical operation. Instrumental variables and tests for causality further supported the role of intraoperative crystalloid administration in reducing the duration and variance of phLOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Smith
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, and the Ochsner Clinical School program of the University of Queensland (Australia) School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Bobby Nossaman
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, and the Ochsner Clinical School program of the University of Queensland (Australia) School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Omesiete N, Martinez C, Pandit V, Villalvazo Y, Jecius H, Thompson E, Norcera M, Nfonsam V. Restricting Intraoperative Fluid Volume Allows Earlier Return of Bowel Function After Colon and Rectal Surgery. J Surg Res 2019; 244:130-135. [PMID: 31284142 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Return of bowel function (ROBF) after abdominal surgery is an important determinant of patient outcomes. The role of intraoperative fluids (IOFs) in colon surgery remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of IOF on ROBF in patients undergoing colon surgery. We hypothesized that minimizing IOFs allows earlier ROBF. METHODS A 2-year (2016-2017) retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing elective colon resection was performed at our tertiary hospital using a protocol limiting IOF and postoperative narcotics. Patients were divided into two groups: preprotocol (2016) and postprotocol (PoP) (2017). Patients were matched using propensity score matching for age, gender, comorbidities, Anesthesiology Severity Score, indication for procedure, and procedure type. The outcome measured was ROBF. Secondary outcome measures were complication rates and hospital length of stay. RESULTS A total of 360 patients were analyzed. After propensity matching, 90 patients (preprotocol: 45; PoP: 45) were included. The mean age was 62.2 ± 14.8 y, 43.3% male, and 44.4% of procedures were performed laparoscopically. There was no difference in demographics and comorbidities between groups. PoP patients received lower IOF (P = 0.036, 2016: 1198.8 ± 1096.5 mL, 2017: 2176.7 ± 1458.3 mL) and lower postoperative narcotics (P = 0.042). PoP patients had earlier ROBF 2[2-4], 4[3-5] (odds ratio: 1.18 [1.05-1.52], P = 0.04), shorter length of stay 3[2-5] d versus 5[4-7] (odds ratio: 1.11 [1.09-1.89], P = 0.043), and trended toward lower complication rates (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS IOF volume independently impacts ROBF after colon surgery. Restricting IOF allows for earlier bowel function and shorter hospital stay. Further studies defining optimum fluid management impacting ROBF may help optimize patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Viraj Pandit
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - Hunter Jecius
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Restrictive Perioperative Fluid Management in Pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 2018; 42:2938-2950. [PMID: 29464346 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4545-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is significant interest and controversy surrounding the effect of restrictive fluid management on outcomes in major gastrointestinal surgery. This has been most studied in colorectal surgery, although the literature relating to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) patients is growing. The aim of this paper was to generate a comprehensive review of the available evidence for restrictive perioperative fluid management strategies and outcomes in PD. METHODS MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 2017. A review protocol was utilized and registered with PROSPERO. Primary citations that evaluated perioperative fluid management in PD, including those as part of a clinical pathway, were considered. The primary outcome was postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Secondary outcomes included delayed gastric emptying (DGE), complication rate, length of stay (LOS), mortality, and readmission. RESULTS A total of six studies involving 846 patients were included (2009-2015), of which four were RCTs. Pooled analysis of RCTs and high-quality observational studies found no effect of restrictive intraoperative fluid management on POPF, DGE, complication rate, LOS, mortality, and readmission. Only one study assessed postoperative fluid management exclusively and found prolonged LOS in patients in the restricted fluid group. CONCLUSION Based on results of RCTs and high-quality observational studies, intraoperative fluid restriction in PD has not been shown to significantly affect postoperative outcomes. There are too few studies assessing postoperative fluid management to draw conclusions at this time.
Collapse
|
12
|
Major P, Wysocki M, Torbicz G, Gajewska N, Dudek A, Małczak P, Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Radkowiak D, Budzyński A. Risk Factors for Prolonged Length of Hospital Stay and Readmissions After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obes Surg 2018; 28:323-332. [PMID: 28762024 PMCID: PMC5778173 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2844-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) are most commonly performed bariatric procedures. Laparoscopic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols managed to decrease length of hospital and morbidity. However, there are patients in whom, despite adherence to the protocol, the length of stay (LOS) remains longer than targeted. This study aimed to assess potential risk factors for prolonged LOS and readmissions. Methods The study was a prospective observation with a post-hoc analysis of bariatric patients in a tertiary referral university teaching hospital. Inclusion criteria were undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Exclusion criteria were occurrence of perioperative complications, prior bariatric procedures, and lack of necessary data. The primary endpoints were the evaluations of risk factors for prolonged LOS and readmissions. Results Median LOS was 3 (2–4) days. LOS > 3 days occurred in 145 (29.47%) patients, 79 after LSG (25.82%) and 66 after LRYGB (35.48%; p = 0.008). Factors significantly prolonging LOS were low oral fluid intake, high intravenous volume of fluids administered on POD0, and every additional 50 km distance from habitual residence to bariatric center. The risk of hospital readmission rises with occurrence of intraoperative adverse events and low oral fluid intake on the day of surgery on. Conclusions Risk factors for prolonged LOS are low oral fluid intake, high intravenous volume of fluids administered on POD0, and every additional 50 km distance from habitual residence. Risk factors for hospital readmission are intraoperative adverse events and low oral fluid intake on the day of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Major
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21 St., 31-501, Krakow, Poland.,Department of Endoscopic, Metabolic and Soft Tissue Tumors Surgery, Krakow, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Krakow, Poland
| | - Michał Wysocki
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21 St., 31-501, Krakow, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Krakow, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Torbicz
- Students' Scientific Group at 2nd Department of Surgery, JUMC, Krakow, Poland
| | - Natalia Gajewska
- Students' Scientific Group at 2nd Department of Surgery, JUMC, Krakow, Poland
| | - Alicja Dudek
- Students' Scientific Group at 2nd Department of Surgery, JUMC, Krakow, Poland
| | - Piotr Małczak
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21 St., 31-501, Krakow, Poland. .,Department of Endoscopic, Metabolic and Soft Tissue Tumors Surgery, Krakow, Poland. .,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Krakow, Poland.
| | - Michał Pędziwiatr
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21 St., 31-501, Krakow, Poland.,Department of Endoscopic, Metabolic and Soft Tissue Tumors Surgery, Krakow, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Krakow, Poland
| | - Magdalena Pisarska
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21 St., 31-501, Krakow, Poland.,Department of Endoscopic, Metabolic and Soft Tissue Tumors Surgery, Krakow, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Krakow, Poland
| | - Dorota Radkowiak
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21 St., 31-501, Krakow, Poland.,Department of Endoscopic, Metabolic and Soft Tissue Tumors Surgery, Krakow, Poland
| | - Andrzej Budzyński
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21 St., 31-501, Krakow, Poland.,Department of Endoscopic, Metabolic and Soft Tissue Tumors Surgery, Krakow, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, Reynolds N, Roulin D, Demartines N, Vignaud M, Alvarez A, Singh PM, Lobo DN. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. World J Surg 2017; 40:2065-83. [PMID: 26943657 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3492-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 338] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the last two decades, an increasing number of bariatric surgical procedures have been performed worldwide. There is no consensus regarding optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery. This review aims to present such a consensus and to provide graded recommendations for elements in an evidence-based "enhanced" perioperative protocol. METHODS The English-language literature between January 1966 and January 2015 was searched, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached a consensus recommendation. RESULTS Although for some elements, recommendations are extrapolated from non-bariatric settings (mainly colorectal), most recommendations are based on good-quality trials or meta-analyses of good-quality trials. CONCLUSIONS A comprehensive evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society. The guidelines were endorsed by the International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) and based on the evidence available in the literature for each of the elements of the multimodal perioperative care pathway for patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Thorell
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital & Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, 116 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - A D MacCormick
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Surgery, Counties Manukau Health, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - S Awad
- The East-Midlands Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.,School of Clinical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - N Reynolds
- The East-Midlands Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK
| | - D Roulin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - N Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - M Vignaud
- Département d'anesthésie reanimation Service de chirurgie digestive, CHU estaing 1, place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - A Alvarez
- Department of Anesthesia, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires University, 1179, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - P M Singh
- Department of Anesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India
| | - D N Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Duration of Nil Per Os is causal in hospital length of stay following laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:1901-1905. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5191-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
15
|
Enomoto LM, Blackham A, Woo Y, Yamamoto M, Pimiento J, Gusani NJ, Wong J. Ratio of intra-operative fluid to anesthesia time and its impact on short term perioperative outcomes following gastrectomy for cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2016; 33 Pt A:13-7. [PMID: 27394407 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Revised: 06/17/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the short-term impact of fluid administration during gastrectomy for cancer. METHODS A multi-institutional database of patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer from three tertiary centers was reviewed. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS 205 patients were included. The majority of patients (n = 116, 57%) underwent proximal or total gastrectomy. Median anesthesia time was 280 min (range 95-691 min). Median intraoperative crystalloid administration was 2901 ml (range 500-10,700 ml). Median colloid administration was 0 (range 0-3835 ml), although only 66 patients (32%) received colloid. On multivariate analysis, patients who received <10.0 ml total fluid per minute of anesthesia had a significantly higher risk of complications (OR 4.12, p = 0.010). Crystalloid and total fluid administration ratios did not significantly affect LOS or discharge disposition. CONCLUSIONS Restricting intra-operative fluid resuscitation to <10 ml total fluid per minute anesthesia is associated with an increased risk of complications in patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Enomoto
- The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 500 University Drive, MC-H159, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA.
| | - Aaron Blackham
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| | - Yanghee Woo
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Maki Yamamoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| | - Jose Pimiento
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| | - Niraj J Gusani
- Program for Liver, Pancreas, & Foregut Tumors, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
| | - Joyce Wong
- Program for Liver, Pancreas, & Foregut Tumors, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|