Unidirectional barbed sutures as a novel technique for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Despite advancements in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) using the intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique (sIPOM), recurrence remains a common postoperative complication. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of defect closure (IPOM-plus) versus non-closure in ventral and incisional hernia repair. The aim is to determine which technique yields better outcomes in terms of reducing recurrence and complication rates.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from their inception until October 1, 2022, to identify all online English publications that compared the outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with and without fascia closure.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eleven cohort studies involving 1585 patients met the inclusion criteria. The IPOM-plus technique was found to reduce the recurrence of hernias (OR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.35, 0.76], p < 0.01), seroma (OR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.32, 0.71], p < 0.01), and mesh bulging (OR = 0.08, 95% CI [0.01, 0.42], p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.29, 0.65], p < 0.0001), type of article (OR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.35, 0.76], p = 0.0008 < 0.01), geographical location (OR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.36, 0.82], p = 0.004 < 0.01), follow-up time (OR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.34, 0.73], p = 0.0004 < 0.01) had a significant influence on the postoperative recurrence of the IPOM-plus technique.

CONCLUSION

The IPOM-plus technique has been shown to greatly reduce the occurrence of recurrence, seroma, and mesh bulging. Overall, the IPOM-plus technique is considered a safe and effective procedure. However, additional randomized controlled studies with extended follow-up periods are necessary to further evaluate the IPOM-plus technique.

Switching from robotic-assisted extended transabdominal preperitoneal (eTAPP) to totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernia repair for umbilical and epigastric hernias

Our study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the robotic-assisted extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair compared to transabdominal preperitoneal (eTAPP) repair with a suprapubic trocar insertion to treat umbilical and epigastric hernias. On a prospectively maintained database, we identified patients who underwent either eTEP or eTAPP for treating umbilical and epigastric hernias. During the study period, 53 patients were included, 32 in the eTEP group and 21 in the eTAPP group. The mean age was 59.0 ± 13.9 years, 45 patients (84.9%) were male, and the mean BMI was 28.0 ± 5.9 kg/m2. Most hernias were umbilical (81.1%) and primary (83.0%). The operative time for eTEP was slightly shorter than for eTAPP (106 ± 43 min vs. 126 ± 74 min, p = 0.232). Postoperatively, only one case of bleeding and one seroma were recorded. No complication occurred during a mean follow-up of 11.3 ± 6.4 months in the eTEP group and 20.5 ± 9.7 months in the eTAPP group. In conclusion, our study showed that the eTEP with suprapubic approach was safe and feasible in the treatment of epigastric and umbilical hernias. According to our experience, shorter operative time, integrity of the posterior layers and increased overlap size are the main surgical reasons of switching from eTAPP to eTEP.

Unidirectional barbed sutures vs. interrupted intracorporeal knots in thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in pediatrics

Background

Intracorporeal suturing knots continue to be one of the most challenging and time-consuming steps in the thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Barbed unidirectional knotless sutures are designed to shorten surgical procedures by eliminating the need to tie knots. This work aimed to compare unidirectional barbed sutures and interrupted intracorporeal knots in the thoracoscopic repair of CDH in pediatrics regarding the time required to suture, operative time and complications.

Methods

This retrospective study included 139 patients presented with Bochdalek CDH. Patients were classified into early (neonatal) and late presentations. The hernia defect was repaired by unidirectional Barbed sutures (V-LocTM and StratafixTM sutures) in group B or by Conventional interrupted intracorporeal knots in group C.

Results

In both early and delayed presentations, the time required to suture (15 and 13 min in group B, 33 and 28 min in group C for neonatal and delayed presentation respectively) was significantly shorter in group B. Complications (visceral perforation, wound infection, and recurrence) insignificantly differed between group B and group C of early presentation. No patients suffered from major complications in both groups.

Conclusions

Both unidirectional barbed sutures and intracorporeal knots were safe and effective. However, unidirectional barbed sutures are a time-saving choices for CDH thoracoscopic repair in early and late presentations.

Laparoscopic treatment of ventral hernias: the Italian national guidelines

Primary and incisional ventral hernias are significant public health issues for their prevalence, variability of professional practices, and high costs associated with the treatment In 2019, the Board of Directors of the Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery (SICE) promoted the development of new guidelines on the laparoscopic treatment of ventral hernias, according to the new national regulation. In 2022, the guideline was accepted by the government agency, and it was published, in Italian, on the SNLG website. Here, we report the adopted methodology and the guideline's recommendations, as established in its diffusion policy. This guideline is produced according to the methodology indicated by the SNGL and applying the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology. Fifteen recommendations were produced as a result of 4 PICO questions. The level of recommendation was conditional for 12 of them and conditional to moderate for one. This guideline's strengths include relying on an extensive systematic review of the literature and applying a rigorous GRADE method. It also has several limitations. The literature on the topic is continuously and rapidly evolving; our results are based on findings that need constant re-appraisal. It is focused only on minimally invasive techniques and cannot consider broader issues (e.g., diagnostics, indication for surgery, pre-habilitation).

A prospective randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of barbed sutures versus standard fixation techniques using tackers in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair

Background

Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia mesh repair (LVIHR) has become the standard of care due to shorter recovery time, low rate of complication and recurrence. The most common fixation technique for mesh is by tackers but results in patients having more pain in the early postoperative period. One modality to reduce pain has been to use intracorporeal conventional sutures but with the disadvantage of inherent difficulty in handling, suturing and knotting which is obviated by barbed sutures.

Methods

The study was conducted over a period of two years. Sixty patients with primary ventral and incisional hernia were randomized to either fixation of mesh with barbed sutures or to tackers with transfacial sutures. Primary end points were used to evaluate and compare mesh fixation time, early postoperative pain and complications, whereas secondary end points were used to compare the incidence of chronic pain and recurrence.

Results

Of the 60 patients, 51% had primary ventral hernia, and the rest had incisional hernia. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score for the barbed suture group at all intervals postoperatively was significantly lower than that for tackers. The mean time taken for fixation in the tacker group was significantly lower. Only one patient under the tacker group developed recurrence.

Conclusion

Barbed suture group had significantly less pain and is economical with the same rates of recurrence as compared with tackers. Hence, low pain scores, cost effectiveness and relatively easier intracorporeal suturing make barbed sutures a viable alternative for intracorporeal mesh fixation in LVIHR.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF KNOTLESS BARBED SUTURES IN CAPSULAR CLOSURE FOLLOWING DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURE FIXATION

Introduction

Good wound closure is an important step in management of distal femur fracture to prevent infection and faster rehabilitation. Knotless barbed sutures can save time and distribute wound tension evenly. However, its role in terms of functional outcome, closure time, and postoperative complications has not been studied in a distal femur fracture.

Material and methods

A total of 47 patients aged more than 18 years of distal femur fracture treated with distal femur locking plate were randomized either into either barbed or traditional suture groups. in the barbed group, capsular wound closure was carried out with 2-0 bidirectional barbed knotless sutures (Quill SRS^® PDO, Angiotech, Vancouver, BC, Canada). In patients assigned to group B, capsular closure was done with 1-0 Vicryl^® (Ethicon inc. Somerville, NJ) and 5-0 Ethibond^® alternatively.

Results

The mean flexion at the knee joint was 105.7±15.6 degrees in the study group while it was 110.4±13.7 in the control group (p= 0.2133). Mean estimated closure time was significantly shorter in the study group as compared to the control group (p<0.05). Cases of needle prick injury were higher in traditional suture group. Patients developed stitch abscess and superficial infection in both groups. However, the difference in incidence between the two was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Barbed suture is an efficient method of wound closure. It reduces wound closure time with similar complication rate as with use of conventional sutures. Evidence Level II; Randomized Clinical Trial.

Non-absorbable Barbed Sutures for Primary Fascial Closure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

Purpose

The aim of this study is to describe the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal fascial closure using a barbed suture prior to mesh placement.

Materials and methods

Patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were included in this retrospective review. Patients were divided into two groups. In the first group, primary fascial closure was performed with a 2-polypropylene non-absorbable unidirectional barbed suture followed by fixation of the intraperitoneal mesh. In the second group, the mesh was fixed intraperitoneally using tacks without closing the fascial defect.

Results

A total of 148 patients who underwent laparoscopic primary ventral hernia repair were included. A total of 72 (48.6%) patients were included in the barbed suture with mesh group and 76 (51.4%) patients in the mesh-only group. The mean fascial defect size was 25 cm² in the first group and 64 cm² in the second group. The median suturing time for fascial closure was 15 minutes. The average surgery time was 98 minutes in the first group and 96 minutes in the second group. The mean follow-up period was 80 days for Group 1 and 135 days for Group 2. No hernia recurrence or mortality occurred in this study.

Conclusion

The barbed suture closure technique is a fast, safe, and effective technique for fascial closure during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in combination with mesh placement. Further evidence to support these findings and longer follow-up periods are warranted to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Laparoscopic repair for primary epigastric hernia containing falciform ligament: A case report and review of literature

Falciform ligament herniation is a rare type of epigastric hernia. We report a case of a primary epigastric hernia containing a falciform ligament repaired using nonabsorbable barbed suture under laparoscopic surgery. A 74-year-old woman presented with discomfort in the upper abdomen. Physical examination revealed a 3-cm non-tender mass, and abdominal computed tomography revealed epigastric hernia with an incarcerated falciform ligament. By observation with a laparoscope, the fascial defect was single and 1.0 cm in diameter, thus sutured repair was selected. At 4 months follow-up, she had no complications or recurrence. The laparoscopic approach is useful for diagnosis and deciding a repair method of an epigastric hernia. The barbed suture closure system is convenient and effective for intracorporeal hernial defect closing. Both primary and incisional falciform ligament herniation have been reported in the past, and we reviewed six cases, including our case.

Incidence, Burden on the Health Care System, and Factors Associated With Incisional Hernia After Trauma Laparotomy

Importance

The evidence provided supports routine and systematic capture of long-term outcomes after trauma, lengthening the follow-up for patients at risk for incisional hernia (IH) after trauma laparotomy (TL), counseling on the risk of IH during the postdischarge period, and consideration of preventive strategies before future abdominal operations to lessen IH prevalence as well as the patient and health care burden.

Objective

To determine burden of and factors associated with IH formation following TL at a population-based level across health care settings.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based cohort study included adult patients who were admitted with traumatic injuries and underwent laparotomy with follow-up of 2 or more years. The study used 18 statewide databases containing data collected from January 2006 through December 2016 and corresponding to 6 states in diverse regions of the US. Longitudinal outcomes were identified within the Statewide Inpatient, Ambulatory, and Emergency Department Databases. Patients admitted with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for traumatic injuries with 1 or more concurrent open abdominal operations were included. Data analysis was conducted from March 2020 through June 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was IH after TL. Risk-adjusted Cox regression allowed identification of patient-level, operative, and postoperative factors associated with IH.

Results

Of 35 666 patients undergoing TL, 3127 (8.8%) developed IH (median [interquartile range] follow-up, 5.6 [3.4-8.6] years). Patients had a median age of 49 (interquartile range, 31-67) years, and most were male (21 014 [58.9%]), White (21 584 [60.5%]), and admitted for nonpenetrating trauma (28 909 [81.1%]). The 10-year IH rate and annual incidence were 11.1% (95% CI, 10.7%-11.5%) and 15.6 (95% CI, 15.1-16.2) cases per 1000 people, respectively. Within risk-adjusted analyses, reoperation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.2-1.37]) and subsequent abdominal surgeries (aHR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.56-1.88]), as well as obesity (aHR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.69-2.10]), intestinal procedures (aHR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.36-1.59]), and public insurance (aHRs: Medicare, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.20-1.57]; Medicaid, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.21-1.51]) were among the variables most strongly associated with IH. Every additional reoperation at the index admission and subsequently resulted in a 28% (95% CI, 20%-37%) and 71% (95% CI, 56%-88%) increased risk for IH, respectively. Repair of IH represented an additional $36.1 million in aggregate costs (39.9%) relative to all index TL admissions.

Conclusions and Relevance

Incisional hernia after TL mirrors the epidemiology and patient profile characteristics seen in the elective setting. We identified patient-level, perioperative, and novel postoperative factors associated with IH, with obesity, intestinal procedures, and repeated disruption of the abdominal wall among the factors most strongly associated with this outcome. These data support preemptive strategies at the time of reoperation to lessen IH incidence. Longer follow-up may be considered after TL for patients at high risk for IH.

A systematic review of outcome reporting in incisional hernia surgery

Background

The incidence of incisional hernia is up to 20 per cent after abdominal surgery. The management of patients with incisional hernia can be complex with an array of techniques and meshes available. Ensuring consistency in reporting outcomes across studies on incisional hernia is important and will enable appropriate interpretation, comparison and data synthesis across a range of clinical and operative treatment strategies.

Methods

Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE (from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All studies documenting clinical and patient-reported outcomes for incisional hernia were included.

Results

In total, 1340 studies were screened, of which 92 were included, reporting outcomes on 12 292 patients undergoing incisional hernia repair. Eight broad-based outcome domains were identified, including patient and clinical demographics, hernia-related symptoms, hernia morphology, recurrent incisional hernia, operative variables, postoperative variables, follow-up and patient-reported outcomes. Clinical outcomes such as hernia recurrence rates were reported in 80 studies (87 per cent). A total of nine different definitions for detecting hernia recurrence were identified. Patient-reported outcomes were reported in 31 studies (34 per cent), with 18 different assessment measures used.

Conclusions

This review demonstrates the significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting in incisional hernia studies, with significant variation in outcome assessment and definitions. This is coupled with significant under-reporting of patient-reported outcomes.

Seroma prevention strategies in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) has been increasing in popularity over the years. Seroma formation is a common complication of LVHR. The aim of this study is to review the current evidence on seroma prevention strategies following LVHR.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase (1946-13 February 2019) and Medline (1946-13 February 2019) databases was conducted using terms which include "seroma", "hernia, ventral" and "laparoscopy". All studies are comparative retrospective or prospective human adult studies in peer-reviewed journals describing at least one intra-operative intervention designed to decrease the rate of seroma formation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

RESULTS

The database searches identified 3762 citations, and 21 studies were included for final analysis. Five studies compared the different methods of mesh fixation, nine studies compared primary defect closure (PFC) and bridged repair, two studies compared the effect of different types of meshes, two studies looked into the use of electrical cauterization, one study compared single- site laparoscopy with conventional laparoscopy, one study looked into the use of fibrin sealant and one study compared transabdominal preperitoneal placement of mesh with conventional repair. PFC appears to be the most promising with large studies showing a low rate of seroma formation with additional benefits of decreasing wound infection and recurrence rate. Cauterisation of hernia sac and injection of fibrin sealant also show promising results but are mainly derived from small studies. Other strategies did not demonstrate benefit.

CONCLUSION

Currently, primary fascial closure appears to be the most promising strategy available to decrease seroma formation after LVHR based on the results of large studies. Other promising strategies that decrease dead space such as cauterisation of the sac and fibrin sealant injection will require further multicentre trials to confirm benefit before an increase in operative time and cost can be justified for their routine use.

Complete intracorporeal defect closure using unidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: Preliminary experience with short-term follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Surgical techniques to close defects in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair vary across the literature. We herein demonstrate our original and standardized surgical technique for laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with complete intracorporeal defect closure using barbed suture.

MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Complete intracorporeal defect closures were indicated for defects less than or equal to 6 cm in transverse diameter. We performed a defect closure with a running suture using barbed suture in a caudal to cranial direction, with tissue bites and inter-suture spacing of 1 cm each. The hernial sac was incorporated into the suturing to reduce possible dead space. After the procedure, intraperitoneal onlay mesh was placed. Seven patients underwent this procedure. The median total operative time was 188 min, and the median time specifically for defect closure was 25 min. There was no seroma, mesh bulge, persisting pain, or hernia recurrence at follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Our proposed technique is simple and can be safely performed with good short-term outcomes.

A systematic methodological review of non-randomised interventional studies of elective ventral hernia repair: clear definitions and a standardised minimum dataset are needed

BACKGROUND

Ventral hernias (VHs) often recur after surgical repair and subsequent attempts at repair are especially challenging. Rigorous research to reduce recurrence is required but such studies must be well-designed and report representative and comprehensive outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assesses methodological quality of non-randomised interventional studies of VH repair by systematic review.

METHODS

We searched the indexed literature for non-randomised studies of interventions for VH repair, January 1995 to December 2017 inclusive. Each prospective study was coupled with a corresponding retrospective study using pre-specified criteria to provide matched, comparable groups. We applied a bespoke methodological tool for hernia trials by combining relevant items from existing published tools. Study introduction and rationale, design, participant inclusion criteria, reported outcomes, and statistical methods were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty studies (17,608 patients) were identified: 25 prospective and 25 retrospective. Overall, prospective studies scored marginally higher than retrospective studies for methodological quality, median score 17 (IQR: 14-18) versus 15 (IQR 12-18), respectively. For the sub-categories investigated, prospective studies achieved higher median scores for their, 'introduction', 'study design' and 'participants'. Surprisingly, no study stated that a protocol had been written in advance. Only 18 (36%) studies defined a primary outcome, and only 2 studies (4%) described a power calculation. No study referenced a standardised definition for VH recurrence and detection methods for recurrence varied widely. Methodological quality did not improve with publication year or increasing journal impact factor.

CONCLUSION

Currently, non-randomised interventional studies of VH repair are methodologically poor. Clear outcome definitions and a standardised minimum dataset are needed.

Laparoscopic percutaneous jejunostomy with intracorporeal V-Loc jejunopexy in esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Barbed sutures are widely used in various laparoscopic digestive surgeries. The purpose of this paper is to present our initial experience of laparoscopic percutaneous jejunostomy with unidirectional barbed sutures in esophageal cancer patients and compare it with our early cases using traditional transabdominal sutures.

METHODS

A total of 118 esophageal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic percutaneous jejunostomy were identified in a single institution in Taiwan from June 2014 to May 2016. The authors' traditional technique consisted of using transabdominal sutures with bolsters to fix a jejunum loop onto the anterior abdominal wall. A novel technique was introduced using intracorporeal suturing with knotless unidirectional barbed monofilament absorbable sutures (V-Loc) to attain a seal around the feeding catheter. A comparison between these two techniques was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty cases with barbed V-Loc sutures and 98 cases with transabdominal sutures were identified. The V-Loc sutures appeared to reduce peristomal skin ulcers (19.4 vs. 0 %, p = 0.040), postoperative pain scores during the first 24 h (1.8 ± 1.4 vs. 0.9 ± 1.1, p = 0.007) and on postoperative day 2 (1.7 ± 1.4 vs. 1.0 ± 0.8, p = 0.026) when compared to patients receiving transabdominal sutures. The mean suturing time using V-Loc sutures was 22 min (14-60 min). The mean onset to resumption of enteral feeding was 1.8 ± 0.8 days and the mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was 8 ± 5.1 days, both of which were comparable in the two groups. There was no surgical mortality in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

In the study cohort, the use of knotless unidirectional barbed sutures instead of traditional transabdominal sutures had similar outcomes and appears to be a feasible option for intracorporeal jejunopexy when performing laparoscopic jejunostomy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Barbed Suture Is Associated With Increased Risk of Wound Infection After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Literature addressing the risks of barbed suture in arthroplasty remains limited. No study to our knowledge has compared rates of wound infection between barbed and conventional suture after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). We hypothesized that barbed suture would be associated with an increased risk of wound infection in patients undergoing UKA.

METHODS

Electronic records were retrieved for 1040 UKA procedures. Odds ratios with postoperative wound infection as the outcome and barbed suture as the exposure were calculated. Binary logistic regression corrected for age, gender, body mass index, operative time, and risk factors (smoking, diabetes, renal insufficiency, and immunosuppression). Barbed suture consisted of Quill #2 polydioxanone (or #0 Vicryl) for deep closure and Quill 2-0 Monoderm for subcuticular closure. Conventional suture consisted of #0 Vicryl for deep closure and subcuticular 2-0 Monocryl or staples for skin closure.

RESULTS

A total of 839 procedures were included. Barbed suture was used in 333 surgeries, and conventional suture was used in 506. Eight cases of postoperative wound infection were identified. All infections occurred in the barbed suture cohort. Regression analysis revealed an association between subcuticular barbed suture and postoperative wound infection (odds ratio = 22.818, confidence interval = 2.69-2923.91; P = .0074).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that the use of barbed suture in subcuticular layer closure is associated with an increased risk of wound infection. This may be exacerbated by early intensive mobilization, commonly undertaken after UKA to permit rapid functional return. We recommend against the use of barbed suture for subcuticular layer closure in UKA.