Outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D1 plus lymph node dissection in gastric cancer patients postoperatively diagnosed with locally advanced disease or lymph node metastasis

Current standards of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer remains the 5th most common cancer and the 3rd most common cause of cancer mortality. Most patients diagnosed with gastric cancer still have a poor prognosis due to its advanced presentation at diagnosis, even in countries with developed screening programs. Surgery is the cornerstone of the treatment for gastric cancer, often combined with perioperative chemotherapy. Lymph node dissection is a crucial component of the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. D1 lymphadenectomy is currently recommended for early stage tumors. The extent of lymphadenectomy in advanced gastric cancer, however, is still a matter of debate between Eastern and Western surgeons. Although a D2 dissection is the current standard recommended by most guidelines, there might be a place for more limited dissections such as D1 + in selected cases. This evidence-based review will help defining the optimal lymphadenectomy for patients with gastric cancer.

The Learning Curve for Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer Patients

(1) Background: Hand-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for patients with gastric cancer (GC) has been established as the standard surgical treatment at our center. This study aims to quantify the learning curve for surgeons performing minimally invasive total gastrectomy at a high-volume single center. (2) Methods: One hundred and eighteen consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive total gastrectomy between January 2014 and December 2020 at a single high-volume center were included and reviewed retrospectively. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis (RA-CUSUM) was used to monitor the surgical outcomes for patients with different risks of postoperative mortality using varying-coefficient logistic regression models. Patients were ordered by the sequential number of the procedure performed and divided into two groups according to the degree of surgeon proficiency as determined by RA-CUSUM analysis (group A: 45; group B: 73 patients). Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, pathology, and comorbidities were compared while primary endpoints comprised surgical parameters, postoperative course, and survival outcomes. (3) Results: Forty-four cases were required for the completion of the learning curve. During this time, the mean operating time decreased. Hand-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomy performed after a learning curve was associated with a shorter median operating time (OT) (360 min vs. 289 min, <0.001), and a reduced length of stay (A = 18.0 vs. B = 14.0 days) (p = 0.154), while there was a trend toward less major complications (Clavien−Dindo (CD) 3−5 within 90 days (12 (26.67%) vs. 10 (13.70%) p = 0.079). Our results showed no difference in anastomotic leakage between the two groups (group A vs. group B, 3 (6.67%) vs. 4 (5.48%) p = 0.99). Similarly, 30-day (0 (0%) vs. 1 (1.7%), p = 0.365) and 90-day mortality (1 (2.08%) vs. 2 (3.39%), p = 0.684) were comparable. Following multivariate analysis, the level of surgical proficiency was not a significant prognostic factor for overall survival. (4) Conclusions: A minimum of 44 cases are required for experienced laparoscopic surgeons to achieve technical competence for performing LTG. While operation time decreased after completion of the learning curve, quality criteria such as achievement of R0 resection, anastomotic leakage, and perioperative mortality remained unaltered. Of note, the level of surgical training showed no significant impact on the 2 year OS or DFS.

Comparison of East-Asia and West-Europe cohorts explains disparities in survival outcomes and highlights predictive biomarkers of early gastric cancer aggressiveness

Surgical resection with lymphadenectomy and peri-operative chemotherapy is the universal mainstay for curative treatment of gastric cancer (GC) patients with loco-regional disease. However, GC survival remains asymmetric in West- and East-world regions. We hypothesize this asymmetry derives from differential clinical management. Therefore, we collected chemo-naïve GC patients from Portugal and South-Korea to explore specific immunophenotypic profiles related to disease aggressiveness, and clinicopathological factors potentially explaining associated overall survival (OS) differences. Clinicopathological and survival data were collected from chemo-naïve surgical cohorts from Portugal (West-Europe cohort (WE-C); n=170) and South-Korea (East-Asia cohort (EA-C); n=367), and correlated with immunohistochemical expression profiles of E-cadherin and CD44v6 obtained from consecutive tissue microarrays sections. Survival analysis revealed a subset of 12.4% of WE-C patients, whose tumors concomitantly express E-cadherin_abnormal and CD44v6_very-high, displaying extremely poor OS, even at TNM stages I and II. These WE-C stages I and II patients were particularly aggressive compared to all other, invading deeper into the gastric wall (p=0.032) and more often permeating the vasculature (p=0.018) and nerves (p=0.009). A similar immunophenotypic profile was found in 11.9% of EA-C patients, but unrelated to survival. Stage I and II EA-C patients displaying both biomarkers also permeated more lymphatic vessels (p=0.003), promoting lymph node (LN) metastasis (p=0.019), being diagnosed on average 8-years earlier and submitted to more extensive LN dissection than WE-C. Concomitant E-cadherin_abnormal/CD44v6_very-high expression predicts aggressiveness and poor survival of stage I and II GC submitted to conservative lymphadenectomy.

D1-plus vs D2 nodal dissection in gastric cancer: a propensity score matched comparison and review of published literature

Background

The results of D1-plus lymphadenectomy following gastric resection are seldom investigated. The aim of this study was to compare results of D1-plus vs D2 resections and to provide a literature review.

Methods

Patients who underwent upfront R0 gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma from 2000 to 2016 in three Institutions were selected using propensity scores and categorized according to lymphadenectomy. Statistical analyses were performed for the nodal harvest (LNH) and survival. Published literature comparing D1-plus and D2 was reviewed and analyzed according to PICO and PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Two matched groups of 93 D1-plus and 93 D2 resections were selected. LNH was significantly greater in D2 vs D1-plus dissections (mean 31.2 vs 27.2, p 0.04), however LNH distribution was similar. The cumulative incidence curves for overall survival, disease free and disease specific events did not report significant differences, however Cox regression analysis disclosed that total gastrectomies (HR 1.8; 95% 1.0–2.9), advanced stages (HR 5.9; 95% 3.4–10.3) and D1-plus nodal dissection (HR 2.1; 95% 1.26–3.50) independently correlated with disease free survival. Literature review including 297 D1-plus and 556 D2 lymphadenectomies documented LNH in favor of D2 sub-group (SMD -0.772; 95%CI -1.222- -0.322).

Conclusion

D2 provided greater LNH than D1-plus dissections; prospective studies should aim to investigate long-term survival of D1-plus lymphadenectomy.

Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic (laparoscopy-assisted) gastrectomy (LG) has several short-term benefits as compared with open distal gastrectomy (OG) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Survival rates did not differ significantly between LG and OG in retrospective studies of AGC, although some studies included unmatched groups of patients or patients with AGC who had a preoperative diagnosis of early gastric cancer. The aim of present study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with AGC who underwent LG with those of patients with AGC who underwent OG using a propensity-score matching analysis.

METHODS

The study group comprised patients with a preoperative and pathologically confirmed diagnosis of AGC who underwent LG or OG with lymphadenectomy between January 2001 and December 2012 in our hospital. To minimize bias between the LG and OG groups, propensity scores were calculated using a logistic regression model and the following variables: sex, age, body-mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class, type of gastrectomy, and clinical and pathological tumor stage. After propensity-score matching, 104 patients (52 who underwent LG and 52 who underwent OG) were studied.

RESULTS

LG was associated with significantly earlier initiation of food intake (p <0.01) and a significantly shorter period of postoperative hospitalization (p <0.01). The incidence of all-grade overall, surgical, and medical complications did not differ significantly between the LG group and OG group (p = 0.24, p = 0.12, and p >0.99). Overall and relapse-free survival also did not differ between the LG group and OG group (p = 0.96, p = 0.91). In each tumor stage, overall and relapse-free survival did not differ significantly between the LG group and OG group.

CONCLUSION

LG can be a feasible treatment that is beneficial in terms of earlier recovery after operation and can be expected to result in similar survival as OG in patients with AGC.

Feasibility of Total Gastrectomy with D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer and Predictive Factors for Its Short- and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes after total gastrectomy (TG) with D2 lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TG with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer between December 2008 and December 2011 were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for the short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 229 patients were analyzed, and 22.3 % developed complications within 30 days of surgery. No patient died within 30 days, while 2.6 % died within 90 days of the operation. In the multivariate analysis, age ≥65 years and cardiopulmonary comorbidities were associated with morbidity, whereas hypoproteinemia and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage III were associated with the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The number of preoperative risk factors stratified the morbidity from 10.3 % in those without any risk factors to 40.5 % in patients with both risk factors. Similarly, 5-year survival rates decreased from 68.9 % (DFS) and 71.1 % (OS) in those without risk factors to 20.2 % (DFS) and 22.9 % (OS) in patients with both risk factors.

CONCLUSION

TG with D2 lymphadenectomy has acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. Patient risk stratification may allow for more rational selection of patients and therapeutic strategies for gastric resection.

Evaluation of immune responses of gastric cancer patients treated by laparoscopic and open gastrectomy

Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to offer more advantages than open surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer. However, the perioperative immune responses after laparoscopic surgery remain largely unexplored. Here, we analyzed the immunity of gastric cancer patients treated by laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) or open gastrectomy (OG) with D2 dissection. Seventy patients were randomized into LAG and OG groups. The operative details and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were compared. The immune factors were measured preoperatively as well as on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days (POD). Our results indicate that there was no significant difference between two groups in clinical characteristics. The profiles of white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, as well as the lymphocyte subpopulations, including T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, CD4(+) T cells, and CD8(+) T cells were similar in the LAG and the OG groups. Only the natural killer cell counts were significantly higher in LAG-treated patients than in OG-treated ones on POD7. Moreover, no statistical differences were found between the two groups with respect to the levels of perioperative cytokines, including IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-6, and TNF-α. However, compared with the OG group, most of the immune factors in the LAG group had trends to return to preoperative levels on POD7. Our study demonstrates that the immune function of LAG-treated patients showed patterns similar to that of OG-treated patients, although larger prospective multicenter trials are needed to further evaluate the immunological status of LAG.