1
|
González-Haba Ruiz M, Betés Ibáñez MT, Martínez Moreno B, Repiso Ortega A, de la Serna Higuera C, Iglesias García J, Sendino García O, Moris Felgueroso M, Agudo Castillo B, Esteban López-Jamar JM, Lindo Ricce MD, Soria San Teodoro MT, Moya Valverde E, Muñoz López D, Uribarri González L, Sevilla Ribota S, Lariño Noia J, Pérez Miranda M, Aparicio Tormo JR, Vila Costas JJ, Vázquez Sequeiros E, Subtil Íñigo JC, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Sánchez Yagüe A, Núñez Otero JA, Foruny Olcina JR. Endoscopic management of pancreatic collections. Endoscopic Ultrasound Group, Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) Clinical Guidelines. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2024; 116:423-437. [PMID: 38305682 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10276/2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It can develop complications such as fluid collections and necrosis. Infection of necrosis occurs in about 20-40 % of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and is associated with organ failure and worse prognosis. In the past few years the treatment of pancreatic collections has shifted from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage. These guidelines from a selection of experts among the Endoscopic Ultrasound Group, Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) are intended to provide advice on the management of pancreatic collections based on a thorough review of the available scientific evidence. It also reflects the experience and clinical practice of the authors, who are advanced endoscopists or clinical pancreatologists with extensive experience in managing patients with acute pancreatitis.
Collapse
|
2
|
Gornals JB, Velasquez-Rodriguez JG, Bas-Cutrina F, Garcia Garcia De Paredes A, Esteban JM, Teran A, Gonzalez-Huix F, Perez-Miranda M, Guarner-Argente C, Vila JJ, Garcia-Sumalla A, Foruny JR, Fisac-Vazquez J, Moris M, Miquel-Salas I, De-la-Serna Higuera C, Murzi-Pulgar M, Sanchez-Yague A, Salord S, Ruiz-Osuna S, Busquets J, Sanllorente-Melenchon M, Videla S, Moreno R, Tebe-Cordomi C, Hereu P, Vazquez-Sequeiros E. Plastic pigtail vs lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis (PROMETHEUS study): an open-label, multicenter randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2148-2159. [PMID: 38448625 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10699-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have displaced double-pigtail plastic stents (DPS) as the standard treatment for walled-off necrosis (WON),β but evidence for exclusively using LAMS is limited. We aimed to assess whether the theoretical benefit of LAMS was superior to DPS. METHODS This multicenter, open-label, randomized trial was carried out in 9 tertiary hospitals. Between June 2017, and Oct 2020, we screened 99 patients with symptomatic WON, of whom 64 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the DPS group (n = 31) or the LAMS group (n = 33). The primary outcome was short-term (4-weeks) clinical success determined by the reduction of collection. Secondary endpoints included long-term clinical success, hospitalization, procedure duration, recurrence, safety, and costs. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. CLINICALTRIALS gov, NCT03100578. RESULTS A similar clinical success rate in the short term (RR, 1.41; 95% CI 0.88-2.25; p = 0.218) and in the long term (RR, 1.2; 95% CI 0.92-1.58; p = 0.291) was observed between both groups. Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the LAMS group (35 vs. 45-min, p = 0.003). The hospital admission after the index procedure (median difference, - 10 [95% CI - 17.5, - 1]; p = 0.077) and global hospitalization (median difference - 4 [95% CI - 33, 25.51]; p = 0.82) were similar between both groups. Reported stent-related adverse events were similar for the two groups (36 vs.45% in LAMS vs. DPS), except for de novo fever, which was significantly 26% lower in LAMS (RR, 0.26 [0.08-0.83], p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS The clinical superiority of LAMS over DPS for WON therapy was not proved, with similar clinical success, hospital stay and similar safety profile between both groups, yet a significant reduction in procedure time was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03100578.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan B Gornals
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| | - Julio G Velasquez-Rodriguez
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Francesc Bas-Cutrina
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ana Garcia Garcia De Paredes
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose-Miguel Esteban
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro Teran
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Ferran Gonzalez-Huix
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Carlos Guarner-Argente
- Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Pathology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Juan J Vila
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Albert Garcia-Sumalla
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Jose Ramon Foruny
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquin Fisac-Vazquez
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Moris
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Isabel Miquel-Salas
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | - Marianette Murzi-Pulgar
- Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Pathology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Andres Sanchez-Yague
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain
| | - Silvia Salord
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Sandra Ruiz-Osuna
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Juli Busquets
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Hepato-bilio-Pancreatic Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Mireia Sanllorente-Melenchon
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Unit (UICEC), Plataforma Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCRen), Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Sebas Videla
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Unit (UICEC), Plataforma Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCRen), Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ramon Moreno
- Economics and Finance Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Cristian Tebe-Cordomi
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Biostatistics Department, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Pilar Hereu
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Unit (UICEC), Plataforma Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCRen), Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ektov VN, Fedorov AV, Khodorkovsky MA, Kurkin AV. [Transgastric necrectomy for acute pancreatitis]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2024:73-79. [PMID: 39422008 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202410173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
The review is devoted to transgastric necrectomy in the treatment of infected forms of acute pancreatitis. The authors discuss the indications for transgastric necrectomy and technical features of these interventions (direct endoscopic necrectomy, laparoscopic and open transgastric necrectomy). Numerous studies devoted to results of transgastric necrectomy indicate advisability of this procedure in carefully selected patients and interdisciplinary interaction of various specialists before and after surgery. Regional specialized centers for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis are necessary for wider introduction of minimally invasive surgical technologies and their personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V N Ektov
- Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University, Voronezh, Russia
| | - A V Fedorov
- Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
- Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - A V Kurkin
- Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University, Voronezh, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jaeger K, Meyer F, Füldner F, Will U. Endoscopic necrosectomy of infected WON in acute necrotising pancreatitis - Development of an effective therapeutic algorithm based on a single-center consecutive patient cohort. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:665-675. [PMID: 36126931 DOI: 10.1055/a-1890-5674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Development of an effective therapeutic algorithm for interventional (minimally invasive) approach to infected walled-off necrosis (WON) in patients with necrotising pancreatitis reflecting real-word data. MATERIAL/METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic necrosectomy for necrotising pancreatitis through a defined study period were enclosed in this retrospective observational case study. The therapeutic approach was analysed for clinical success rate, complication spectrum and rate as well as mortality and compared with data from the literature. Finally, a therapeutic algorithm was derived. RESULTS From 2004 to 2019, 126 patients with necrotising pancreatitis (median of APACHE II score, 10.5 points) were treated. In 92.9 % of cases (n=117), an infected WON with microbial pathogen detection was found. After a median of 18 days from symptom onset, first intervention was performed (53.2 % as percutaneous drainage with programmed rinsing, 29.4 % as EUS-guided internal drainage). From 2004 to 2010, double pigtail stents were used. Later, lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) such as AXIOSTM stent (Boston Scientific, Ratingen, Germany) was preferred. The combined percutaneous and internal drainage was performed in approximately 50 % of subjects.Endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy was performed in 123 patients (97.6 %) at a median of 33 days from symptom onset. Endoscopic percutaneous necrosectomy was conducted in 11.1 % of the individuals. A median number of two endoscopic necrosectomy sessions per patient was necessary for the therapy. The clinical success rate (discharge without surgical intervention) was 82.5 %. The complication rate (bleeding and perforation) and the need for surgery were both 9.5 %. The overall mortality was 8.7 %. CONCLUSION Therapy of necrotising pancreatitis with infected WON consists of early calculated antibiotic therapy with adequate drainage. Combined external and internal drainages with programmed rinsing seem to improve prognosis, as well as minimise I) : the need for forced necrosectomies (mainly via a transluminal access site) and II) : complication rate as well as, thus, improve outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Jaeger
- Dept. of Internal Medicine III (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, General Internal Medicine), Municipal Hospital ("SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera GmbH"), Gera, Germany
| | - Frank Meyer
- Dept. of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University with University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Frank Füldner
- Dept. of Internal Medicine III (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, General Internal Medicine), Municipal Hospital ("SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera GmbH"), Gera, Germany
| | - Uwe Will
- Dept. of Internal Medicine III (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, General Internal Medicine), Municipal Hospital ("SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera GmbH"), Gera, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sameera S, Mohammad T, Liao K, Shahid H, Sarkar A, Tyberg A, Kahaleh M. Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: An Evidence-based Approach. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:346-361. [PMID: 36040932 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Managing pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) remains a challenge for many clinicians. Recently, significant progress has been made in the therapy of PFCs, including improvements in technology and devices, as well as in the development of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques, many of which are proven less traumatic when compared with surgical options and more efficacious when compared with percutaneous techniques. This review will explore latest developments in the management of PFCs and how they incorporate into the current treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohini Sameera
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zeng Y, Yang J, Zhang JW. Endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Progress and challenges. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:1888-1902. [PMID: 36998953 PMCID: PMC10044952 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i9.1888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) represents a severe condition in patients with acute pancreatitis. Invasive interventions are recommended in symptomatic INP. Growing evidence has suggested interventional strategies of INP evolving from traditional surgery to minimally invasive step-up endoscopic procedures. However, there is still no standardized protocol for endoscopic interventions. Recently, various studies have been published about the endoscopic management of INP. This article reviews published articles and guidelines to present the progress and challenges of endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy in INP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Zeng
- Department of Psychology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Jun-Wen Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Electrocautery-enhanced Lumen-apposing Metal Stents in the Management of Symptomatic Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Results From the Multicenter Prospective Pivotal Trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:218-226. [PMID: 33899781 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic decompression is considered a first-line treatment for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) with an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system [electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent (ELAMS)] may facilitate this procedure. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ELAMS in the management of symptomatic PFCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter, nonblinded, prospective, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, investigational device exemption clinical trial was conducted. Enrollment criteria included symptomatic PFCs ≥6 cm with ≥70% fluid fraction. Subjects were followed prospectively for safety, efficacy, and resolution of the collections. Primary endpoint success was defined as ≥50% reduction in PFC size. Clinical outcomes were compared with our previously published series of LAMS without the cautery-enhanced delivery system. RESULTS The target enrollment of 30 patients was achieved in 7 US tertiary care centers. All patients underwent successful placement of the ELAMS. The mean procedure duration, stent placement time, and fluoroscopy exposures were 28.1±12.5, 5.8±2.6, and 1.8±1.6 minutes, respectively. Eight patients had no fluoroscopy. The primary endpoint was achieved in 83.3% of patients. Two adverse events were attributed to the ELAMS: 1 bleeding upon stent removal and 1 stent migration. Relative to the comparator noncautery LAMS multicenter trial (N=33, 8 tertiary centers), there was a significantly shorter procedure duration [36 min ( P <0.001)] with similar technical and clinical outcomes in the ELAMS cohort. CONCLUSION LAMS placed using an electrocautery delivery system significantly reduce procedure duration and were safe and effective in the management of symptomatic PFCs.
Collapse
|
8
|
A surprising culprit for delayed gastrointestinal bleeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholecystoduodenostomy: the double-pigtail stent. Clin J Gastroenterol 2022; 16:279-282. [PMID: 36538256 PMCID: PMC9763802 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-022-01749-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage using a lumen-apposing metal stent has emerged as an accepted option for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients unfit for surgery. While metal stents carry a risk of intra- and post-procedural bleeding, the coaxial placement of a double-pigtail stents through lumen-apposing metal stents has been proposed to lower the bleeding risk by preventing tissue abrasion against the stent flanges. We present a case of an 83 year-old male who had previously undergone uncomplicated endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholecystoduodenostomy with this technique. Six months later, he presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to a duodenal pressure ulcer from the coaxial 10-Fr double-pigtail stent originally employed to prevent such bleeding. The 10-Fr stent was replaced with two 7-Fr stents whose increased flexibility and distribution of pressure across multiple points of contact with the duodenal wall was theorized to reduce the likelihood of erosion or perforation. Following the procedure, the patient's clinical course improved significantly with complete resolution of his symptoms of choledocholithiasis and cholecystitis. While 10-Fr double-pigtail stents are generally preferred for this indication due to their stiffness that reduces out-migration, use of more flexible 7-Fr stents may be advisable in thin-walled structures such as the duodenum.
Collapse
|
9
|
Przybyłkowski A, Nehring P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: What impacts treatment duration? Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 22:310-316. [PMID: 35568680 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are complications resulting from acute or chronic pancreatitis and require treatment in certain clinical conditions. The present study aimed to identify the factors influencing the duration of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts (PPCs), walled-off necrosis (WON), and acute necrotic collections (ANCs). METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 68 patients with PFCs who underwent EUS-guided drainage. The timing and duration of EUS-guided drainage of various PFCs (ANC, WON, and PPCs) were compared, and the factors influencing the duration of endoscopic treatment were identified. RESULTS The mean time to first EUS-guided PFC drainage since the acute pancreatitis episode was 372.0, 505.0, and 18.7 days for WON, PPC, and ANC, respectively, and the mean duration of treatment was 90, 60, and 63 days, respectively. A disconnected pancreatic duct, a history of percutaneous drainage, and an infected PFC were identified as factors influencing the treatment duration. A positive correlation was observed between the treatment duration and patients' age. Patients with a disconnected pancreatic duct had to undergo more procedures. In patients with PPC, clinically successful drainage was more frequently achieved after a single procedure without the need for repeated procedures than in those with WON (90% vs. 59%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Patients with a history of percutaneous drainage, disconnected pancreatic duct, or PFC infection may require longer endoscopic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Przybyłkowski
- Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Piotr Nehring
- Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jagielski M, Jackowski M. The Role of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in Transmural Endoscopic Drainage of Postinflammatory Pancreatic and Peripancreatic Fluid Collections. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2021; 2021:4351151. [PMID: 34691174 PMCID: PMC8528637 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4351151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Rapid development of advanced gastrointestinal endoscopic techniques contributed to the appearance of new biomedical materials including polymers, which are used for the production of different types of endoprostheses. Endotherapy (ET) of postinflammatory pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections (PPFCs) with the use of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is an effective method of treatment. This paper describes the high efficacy of ET and its potential complications, which are mostly related to the design of the LAMS used. The high efficacy of LAMS in the transmural drainage of PPFCs is associated with lower safety of treatment. Complications of ET presented in the manuscript are mainly related to endoprosthesis' construction. This paper presents possible directions of development in the field of transmural LAMSs, which in the future may contribute to the invention of an innovative type of LAMS based on new biomedical technologies. Possibly, subsequent novel endoprosthesis projects, based on the above results, will be able to meet the current needs and requirements associated with endoscopic transmural drainage procedures in cases of postinflammatory PPFCs. The ultimate goal is to improve safety of minimally invasive techniques for treatment of the local consequences of pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz Jagielski
- Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
| | - Marek Jackowski
- Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li J, Zhang Q, Zhou A, Zhao G, Li P. Comparative outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided lumen-apposing mental stents drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis: Case series and meta-analysis. Chronic Dis Transl Med 2021; 7:157-168. [PMID: 34505016 PMCID: PMC8413123 DOI: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage for pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) has become the first-line treatment with quicker recovery and more minor injury compared with surgery and percutaneous drainage. The efficacy of stents implantation and drainage for different PFCs remains controversial, especially lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of LAMS drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts (PPC) and walled-off necrosis (WON). Methods A meta-analysis was performed for LAMS drainage for WON and PPC by systematically searching PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases from January 2010 to January 2020. From 2017 to 2019, 12 patients who were treated with LAMS drainage for PFCs in our medical center were also reviewed and included in this study. Results Combining 11 copies of documents with the data from our medical center, a total of 585 patients with PFCs were enrolled in this meta-analysis, including 343 patients with WON and 242 with PPC. The technical success rate in WON is not significantly different from that of PPC (P = 0.08 > 0.05). The clinical success of LAMS placement was achieved in 99% vs 89% in PPC and WON, respectively (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98, P = 0.01 < 0.05). The further intervention of direct endoscopic necrosectomy was required by 60% of patients in WON group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events, including infection, bleeding, stent migration and stent occlusion, after LAMS placement between WON and PPC. Conclusions Endoscopic ultrasound-guided LAMS for PFCs are feasible, effective with preferable technical and clinical success rates. The clinical effect of LAMS on PPC is slightly better than that of WON, but its adverse reactions still need to be verified in a large-sample prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Anni Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Guiping Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Peng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fedorov AV, Ektov VN, Khodorkovsky MA. [Endoscopic transluminal interventions in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2021:85-92. [PMID: 34480460 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202109185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The review is devoted to endoscopic transluminal interventions in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Terminology, indications and options for transluminal drainage procedures and endoscopic sequestrectomy are presented in detail. The authors analyzed the results of numerous studies devoted to effectiveness of endoscopic interventions and possible combination of treatment options. Modern international clinical guidelines indicating the feasibility of endoscopic treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in multi-field specialized centers are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Fedorov
- Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia
| | - V N Ektov
- Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University, Voronezh, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oh CH, Lee JK, Song TJ, Park JS, Lee JM, Son JH, Jang DK, Choi M, Byeon JS, Lee IS, Lee ST, Choi HS, Kim HG, Chun HJ, Park CG, Cho JY. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Endoscopic Management of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections. Clin Endosc 2021; 54:505-521. [PMID: 34305047 PMCID: PMC8357592 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided intervention has gradually become a standard treatment for peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). However, it is difficult to popularize the procedure in Korea because of restrictions on insurance claims regarding the use of endoscopic accessories, as well as the lack of standardized Korean clinical practice guidelines. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) appointed a Task Force to develope medical guidelines by referring to the manual for clinical practice guidelines development prepared by the National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Previous studies on PFCs were searched, and certain studies were selected with the help of experts. Then, a set of key questions was selected, and treatment guidelines were systematically reviewed. Answers to these questions and recommendations were selected via peer review. This guideline discusses endoscopic management of PFCs and makes recommendations on Indications for the procedure, pre-procedural preparations, optimal approach for drainage, procedural considerations (e.g., types of stent, advantages and disadvantages of plastic and metal stents, and accessories), adverse events of endoscopic intervention, and procedural quality issues. This guideline was reviewed by external experts and suggests best practices recommended based on the evidence available at the time of preparation. This will be revised as necessary to address advances and changes in technology and evidence obtained in clinical practice and future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Hyuk Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Kyu Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tae Jun Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Seok Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jae Min Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Hyuk Son
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Dong Kee Jang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Seok Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul ST. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Teik Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Ho Soon Choi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho Gak Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hoon Jai Chun
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Guk Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Young Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cha University Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Oh CH, Song TJ, Lee JK, Park JS, Lee JM, Son JH, Jang DK, Choi M, Byeon JS, Lee IS, Lee ST, Choi HS, Kim HG, Chun HJ, Park CG, Cho JY. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Endoscopic Management of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections. Gut Liver 2021; 15:677-693. [PMID: 34305047 PMCID: PMC8444102 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided intervention has gradually become a standard treatment for peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). However, it is difficult to popularize the procedure in Korea because of restrictions on insurance claims regarding the use of endoscopic accessories, as well as the lack of standardized Korean clinical practice guidelines. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy appointed a Task Force to develop medical guidelines by referring to the manual for clinical practice guidelines development prepared by the National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Previous studies on PFCs were searched, and certain studies were selected with the help of experts. Then, a set of key questions was selected, and treatment guidelines were systematically reviewed. Answers to these questions and recommendations were selected via peer review. This guideline discusses endoscopic management of PFCs and makes recommendations on Indications for the procedure, pre-procedural preparations, optimal approach for drainage, procedural considerations (e.g., types of stent, advantages and disadvantages of plastic and metal stents, and accessories), adverse events of endoscopic intervention, and procedural quality issues. This guideline was reviewed by external experts and suggests best practices recommended based on the evidence available at the time of preparation. This will be revised as necessary to address advances and changes in technology and evidence obtained in clinical practice and future studies. (Gut Liver 2021;15:-693)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Hyuk Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Kore
| | - Tae Jun Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Kyu Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jin-Seok Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jae Min Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Hyuk Son
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Dong Kee Jang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Seok Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Teik Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | | | - Ho Gak Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hoon Jai Chun
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Guk Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Young Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA University Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fujiwara J, Matsumoto S, Sekine M, Mashima H. C-reactive protein predicts the development of walled-off necrosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. JGH OPEN 2021; 5:907-914. [PMID: 34386599 PMCID: PMC8341195 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aim Walled‐off necrosis (WON) is reported to occur in 1–9% of patients with acute pancreatitis. However, the factors associated with the onset of this condition have not been elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the potential predictive factors for WON in patients diagnosed with severe acute pancreatitis at our hospital. Methods This study included 26 patients with severe acute pancreatitis identified among the 211 patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to our hospital between January 2014 and December 2018. Patients with and without WON (WON and non‐WON groups, respectively) were compared to identify potential factors involved in the onset of this condition. Results The 26 patients had a median age of 67 years, and 65% were male. WON occurred in 15 patients (57.7%). In a univariate analysis, the WON and non‐WON groups differed significantly in terms of maximum C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels (median) (322.7 mg/L vs 163.8 mg/L [P = 0.001]). In a multivariate analysis, a significant association was identified between the maximum CRP level and the onset of WON (odds ratio: 1.20, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–1.37). The CRP level peaked within 3 days in 88%. Conclusion The maximum CRP level was identified as a predictive factor for the onset of WON, and a high proportion of patients with WON exhibited elevated CRP levels within 3 days after diagnosis. This work suggests the clinical importance of continuous monitoring at an early stage after diagnosis to identify the maximum CRP level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Fujiwara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University Saitama-shi Saitama Japan
| | - Satohiro Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University Saitama-shi Saitama Japan
| | - Masanari Sekine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University Saitama-shi Saitama Japan
| | - Hirosato Mashima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University Saitama-shi Saitama Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pereira F, Caldeira A, Leite S, Marques S, Moreira T, Moutinho-Ribeiro P, Nunes N, Bispo M. GRUPUGE Perspective: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Peripancreatic Collections. GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020; 28:39-51. [PMID: 33564703 PMCID: PMC7841806 DOI: 10.1159/000509193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic and peripancreatic collections (PPC) are a known complication of acute pancreatitis. They are categorized into four types of collection: (1) acute peripancreatic fluid collection, (2) pseudocyst, (3) acute necrotic collection and (4) walled-off necrosis. Most PPC resolve spontaneously or are persistent but asymptomatic. Intervention is needed in a minority of patients with infected or symptomatic collection. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage is currently the first-line treatment option for PPC management. It has shown great technical and clinical success, similar to percutaneous or surgical approaches, but with lower morbidity and costs and better quality of life. In this review article, the GRUPUGE presents an updated perspective on the potential role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of peripancreatic collections, addressing the selection criteria and the technical issues of different techniques and analysing emerging data on their efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flávio Pereira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Amato Lusitano, Castelo Branco, Portugal
- *Flávio Pereira, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Amato Lusitano, Av. Pedro Álvares Cabral, PT–6000-085 Castelo Branco (Portugal),
| | - Ana Caldeira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Amato Lusitano, Castelo Branco, Portugal
| | - Sílvia Leite
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Susana Marques
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Teresa Moreira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Moutinho-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Nuno Nunes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | - Miguel Bispo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jang DK, Lee JK. Recent development of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2020. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii200038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Kee Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jun Kyu Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Are Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents More Effective Than Plastic Stents for the Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020; 2020:4952721. [PMID: 32382266 PMCID: PMC7189322 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4952721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Recently, a new type of metal stent, named lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), has been designed to manage pancreatic fluid collections (PFC), and a few studies have reported its efficacy and safety. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the role of LAMS for PFC. Methods We searched the studies from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to May 2019. We extracted the data and analyzed the technical success, clinical success, and adverse events of LAMS to evaluate its efficacy and safety. Results Twenty studies with 1534 patients were included. The pooled technical success, clinical success, and adverse event rates of LAMS for PFC were 96.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 94.6%-97.4%), 86.8% (95% CI: 83.1%-89.8%), and 20.7% (95% CI: 16.1%-26.1%), respectively. Eight studies including 875 patients compared the clinical outcomes of LAMS with plastic stents. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of technical success and clinical success for LAMS and plastic stent was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98-1.04, P = 0.62) and 1.06 (95% CI: 1.01-1.12, P = 0.03), respectively. As for the overall adverse events, the pooled RR was 1.51 (95% CI: 0.67-3.44, P = 0.32). Conclusions Our current study revealed that LAMS has advantages over plastic stents for PFC, with higher clinical success rate and lower complication rate of infection and occlusion.
Collapse
|
19
|
van der Wiel SE, May A, Poley JW, Grubben MJAL, Wetzka J, Bruno MJ, Koch AD. Preliminary report on the safety and utility of a novel automated mechanical endoscopic tissue resection tool for endoscopic necrosectomy: a case series. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E274-E280. [PMID: 32118101 PMCID: PMC7035027 DOI: 10.1055/a-1079-5015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic drainage of walled-off necrosis and subsequent endoscopic necrosectomy has been shown to be an effective step-up management strategy in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. One of the limitations of this endoscopic approach however, is the lack of dedicated and effective instruments to remove necrotic tissue. We aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcome of the EndoRotor, a novel automated mechanical endoscopic tissue resection tool, in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Methods Patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis in need of endoscopic necrosectomy after initial cystogastroscopy, were treated using the EndoRotor. Procedures were performed under conscious or propofol sedation by six experienced endoscopists. Technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes were evaluated and scored. Operator experience was assessed by a short questionnaire. Results Twelve patients with a median age of 60.6 years, underwent a total of 27 procedures for removal of infected pancreatic necrosis using the EndoRotor. Of these, nine patients were treated de novo. Three patients had already undergone unsuccessful endoscopic necrosectomy procedures using conventional tools. The mean size of the walled-off cavities was 117.5 ± 51.9 mm. An average of two procedures (range 1 - 7) per patient was required to achieve complete removal of necrotic tissue with the EndoRotor. No procedure-related adverse events occurred. Endoscopists deemed the device to be easy to use and effective for safe and controlled removal of the necrosis. Conclusions Initial experience with the EndoRotor suggests that this device can safely, rapidly, and effectively remove necrotic tissue in patients with (infected) walled-off pancreatic necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. E. van der Wiel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC – University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A. May
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany
| | - J. W. Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC – University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. J. A. L. Grubben
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC – University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. Wetzka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany
| | - M. J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC – University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A. D. Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC – University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lariño-Noia J, de la Iglesia-García D, González-Lopez J, Díaz-Lopez J, Macías-García F, Mejuto R, Quiroga A, Mauriz V, Jardí A, Iglesias-García J, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Endoscopic drainage with local infusion of antibiotics to avoid necrosectomy of infected walled-off necrosis. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:644-651. [PMID: 32076856 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07428-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) follows a step-up approach. Our group designed a step-up protocol that associates endoscopic drainage with local infusion of antibiotics through transmural nasocystic catheter. Aim of our study was to evaluate our step-up protocol for IPN in terms of proportion of patients avoiding necrosectomy. METHODS Retrospective analysis of patients admitted with acute pancreatitis (AP) between January 2015 and December 2018. The number of patients who responded to each therapeutic step were analysed: step 1, systemic antibiotics; step 2, endoscopic transmural drainage and local infusion of antibiotics; step 3, endoscopic necrosectomy. RESULTS 1158 patients with AP were included. 110 patients (8.4%) suffered from necrotising pancreatitis; 48 of them had IPN (42.6% of necrotising pancreatitis) and were treated with systemic antibiotics. Nineteen patients (39.6% of IPN) responded and did not required any invasive therapy. Six patients with IPN on systemic antibiotics died within the first 4 weeks of disease before step 2 could be applied. Urgent surgical necrosectomy in the first 4 weeks was performed in three additional patients. Endoscopic drainage and local antibiotic therapy was performed in the remaining 20 patients; 9 (45% of them) did well and 9 patients underwent necrosectomy (18.7% of IPN). Two patients died on drainage. Overall mortality of the total cohort of AP was 2.53% CONCLUSIONS: Addition of local infusion of antibiotics to endoscopic drainage avoids the need of necrosectomy in half of patients with IPN not responding to systemic antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Lariño-Noia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
| | - Daniel de la Iglesia-García
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Jaime González-Lopez
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Javier Díaz-Lopez
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Fernando Macías-García
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Rafael Mejuto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Adriano Quiroga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Violeta Mauriz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Andrea Jardí
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Julio Iglesias-García
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ahmad W, Fehmi SA, Savides TJ, Anand G, Chang MA, Kwong WT. Protocol of early lumen apposing metal stent removal for pseudocysts and walled off necrosis avoids bleeding complications. Scand J Gastroenterol 2020; 55:242-247. [PMID: 31942808 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1710246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs; pancreatic pseudocyst (PPC) or walled-off necrosis (WON)) using lumen apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is now standard of care. We adopted a protocol of early LAMS removal and prospectively followed patients to determine if this protocol avoids bleeding complications.Methods: Prospective, consecutive case series of all patients with PPC and WON who underwent drainage with LAMS at a tertiary care referral center from July 2016 to November 2018. LAMS was removed within 4 weeks for PPC and within 6 weeks for WON. Patients with residual necrosis after 6 weeks underwent removal of initial LAMS and replacement with new LAMS every 6 weeks until resolution. Patients were followed within protocol while monitoring for bleeding complications and clinical success. We also performed a literature review to determine rates of LAMS related bleeding at various timepoints.Results: Forty patients (PPC n = 19, WON n = 21) underwent drainage with LAMS. Median time for LAMS removal was 21.0 days for PPC and 33.5 days for WON. Technical success and clinical success were achieved in 40/40 patients with zero cases of delayed bleeding. A literature review of 21 studies and 1378 patients showed 52/1378 (3.8%) bleeding events with 24/52 (46.2%) events occurring within 1 week of LAMS placement.Conclusions: An early removal LAMS protocol for PFC is highly efficacious and prevents delayed bleeding. Based on analysis of published cases, half of LAMS related bleeding occurs within the first week suggesting procedural factors rather than stent dwell time impact risk of bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waseem Ahmad
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Syed A Fehmi
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Thomas J Savides
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Gobind Anand
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Michael A Chang
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Wilson T Kwong
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jagielski M, Smoczyński M, Szeliga J, Adrych K, Jackowski M. Various Endoscopic Techniques for Treatment of Consequences of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Practical Updates for the Endoscopist. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9010117. [PMID: 31906294 PMCID: PMC7019492 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite great progress in acute pancreatitis (AP) treatment over the last 30 years, treatment of the consequences of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) remains controversial. While numerous reports on minimally invasive treatment of the consequences of ANP have been published, several aspects of interventional treatment, particularly endoscopy, are still unclear. In this article, we attempt to discuss these aspects and summarize the current knowledge on endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis. Endotherapy has been shown to be a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment modality in patients with consequences of ANP. The evolution of endoscopic techniques has made endoscopic drainage more effective and reduced the use of other minimally invasive therapies for pancreatic necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz Jagielski
- Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland; (J.S.); (M.J.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Marian Smoczyński
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland; (M.S.); (K.A.)
| | - Jacek Szeliga
- Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland; (J.S.); (M.J.)
| | - Krystian Adrych
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland; (M.S.); (K.A.)
| | - Marek Jackowski
- Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland; (J.S.); (M.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhu CP, Guo JF, Wang YF, Han T, Qian YY, Chen J, Li ZS. Endoscopic management of metal stent migration after walled-off necrosis drainage for 3 months (with video). Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9:66-68. [PMID: 32056989 PMCID: PMC7038735 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_58_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Ping Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie-Fang Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun-Feng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang-Yang Qian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Address for correspondence Dr. Jie Chen, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai 200433, China. E-mail:
Dr. Zhao-Shen Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai 200433, China. E-mail:
| | - Zhao-Shen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Address for correspondence Dr. Jie Chen, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai 200433, China. E-mail:
Dr. Zhao-Shen Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai 200433, China. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gornals JB, Perez-Miranda M, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Vila J, Esteban JM, Gonzalez-Huix F, Guarner-Argente C, Sanchez-Yague A, Teran A, Bas-Cutrina F, De La Serna C, De Paredes AG, Ballester R, Velasquez-Rodriguez J, Salord S, Tebe C, Hereu P, Videla S. Multicenter study of plastic vs. self-expanding metal stents in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis - PROMETHEUS: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Trials 2019; 20:791. [PMID: 31888751 PMCID: PMC6937819 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3988-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It seems that lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are displacing plastic stents in the therapy of pancreatic-fluid collection in walled-off necrosis (WON). To date, there is no quality of evidence to recommend LAMS as the standard treatment in the management of WON. The theoretical benefit of LAMS over plastic stents needs to be proven. METHODS/DESIGN This is a randomized controlled, multicenter, prospective clinical trial with two parallel groups, without masking. One-hundred and fourteen patients with WON will undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural draining in nine tertiary hospitals in Spain and will be randomized to the LAMS or plastic-stent group. The primary endpoint is the short-term (4 weeks) clinical success determined by the reduction of the collection (to < 50% or < 5 cm in size), along with clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints: long-term (4 months) clinical success (total resolution or 5 cm), procedure duration, level of difficulty, safety, and recurrences. DISCUSSION The PROMETHEUS trial has been designed to determine whether LAMS are superior to plastic stents in EUS-guided transmural drainage of WON. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03100578. Registered on 4 April 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan B Gornals
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
- Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Service, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Vila
- Endoscopy Unit, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José M Esteban
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Alvaro Teran
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Francesc Bas-Cutrina
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | - Ana Garcia De Paredes
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Service, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Julio Velasquez-Rodriguez
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Silvia Salord
- Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristian Tebe
- Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research of Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar Hereu
- Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Unit (UICEC IDIBELL), Plataforma SCRen, Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Sebas Videla
- Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Unit (UICEC IDIBELL), Plataforma SCRen, Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Recently, with the advancement of techniques, endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapies have shown distinct advantages, especially in relieving benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), as well as in postoperative pancreaticobiliary diseases. Herein, we present five currently used approaches in endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using lumenapposing biflanged metal stents (LAMS), along with several examples of LAMS-based EUS treatment of pancreaticobiliary diseases. Compared with traditional treatment methods, EUS-guided procedures have – to some degree – shown higher success rates, both technical and clinical. Moreover, EUS-guided therapies reduce the risk of multiple surgical adverse events, including delayed gastric emptying, prolonged hospital stay, increased costs, and delay in cancer treatment. Particularly in terms of postoperative pancreaticobiliary diseases, EUS-guided therapy has assumed an essential role as a treatment option in cases where traditional methods are difficult to perform. Nevertheless, EUS-guided gastrointestinal procedures are still relatively new, with some clinical failures, and additional prospective clinical trials are warranted.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ali SE, Benrajab K, Mardini H, Su L, Gabr M, Frandah WM. Anchoring lumen-apposing metal stent with coaxial plastic stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: any benefit? Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32:620-625. [PMID: 31700240 PMCID: PMC6826067 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019.0414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Anchoring double-pigtail plastic stents (DPSs) within lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) has been proposed to prevent adverse events during endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who received LAMSs alone and those who received both LAMSs and anchoring DPSs for drainage of PFCs. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at the University of Kentucky. Patients with PFCs who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage using LAMSs, with or without DPSs, between January 2016 and March 2018 were included. Categorical data were analyzed using chi-square tests, and continuous variables using 2-sample t-tests. Adverse events were defined according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy’s Lexicon. The primary outcome was to evaluate the efficacy (PFC resolution), and safety (adverse events) of LAMSs with or without DPSs used to drain PFCs. Results: Fifty-seven patients with PFCs were treated by 2 experienced endoscopists over 26 months. Twenty-one (37%) patients received LAMSs alone, and 36 (63%) received LAMSs plus DPSs. Forty-three patients had walled-off pancreatic necrosis, and 14 patients had pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical success (resolution of PFCs) was achieved in 15 patients (71.4%) in the LAMSs alone group, and 21 patients (58.3%) with LAMSs plus DPSs (P=0.32). In patients with LAMSs alone, 6 patients (28.6%) had adverse events, while in those with LAMSs plus DPSs, 14 (38.9%) patients had adverse events (P=0.43). Conclusion: No significant difference was identified in fluid resolution or adverse events between patients with LAMSs alone and those with LAMSs plus DPSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Emhmed Ali
- Department of aInternal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine (Saad Emhmed Ali)
| | - Karim Benrajab
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Karim Benrajab, Houssam Mardini, Moamen Gabr, Wesam M. Frandah)
| | - Houssam Mardini
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Karim Benrajab, Houssam Mardini, Moamen Gabr, Wesam M. Frandah)
| | - Leon Su
- Statistics, College of Arts and Sciences, College of Public Health (Leon Su), University of Kentucky, USA
| | - Moamen Gabr
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Karim Benrajab, Houssam Mardini, Moamen Gabr, Wesam M. Frandah)
| | - Wesam M Frandah
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Karim Benrajab, Houssam Mardini, Moamen Gabr, Wesam M. Frandah)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Flynn DJ, Belkin E, Rolshud D, Potter BB, Howell D. Lumen-apposing metal stent–related splenic artery erosion: diagnosis and management. VideoGIE 2019; 4:261-265. [PMID: 31193948 PMCID: PMC6545064 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
28
|
Tamura T, Itonaga M, Tanioka K, Kawaji Y, Nuta J, Hatamaru K, Yamashita Y, Yoshida T, Ida Y, Maekita T, Iguchi M, Kitano M. Radical treatment for walled-off necrosis: Transmural nasocyst continuous irrigation. Dig Endosc 2019; 31:307-315. [PMID: 30565758 DOI: 10.1111/den.13319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Treatment efficiency of walled-off necrosis (WON) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage (EUS-D) with a double pigtail stent (DPS) is limited. Endoscopic necrosectomy is often carried out if EUS-D fails. However, endoscopic necrosectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Thus, we developed transmural nasocyst continuous irrigation (TNCCI) as an alternative therapeutic option for WON. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of TNCCI therapy for WON. METHODS Between April 2009 and March 2018, 19 of 39 patients admitted with WON underwent EUS-D. Ten consecutive patients also received TNCCI therapy (TNCCI group) between May 2015 and March 2018. TNCCI was carried out by inserting an external tube from the gastroduodenal lumen into the WON under endoscopic ultrasonography guidance and then continuously irrigating the WON with saline at a rate of 40 ml/h. Nine consecutive patients who underwent EUS-D without TNCCI therapy between April 2009 and April 2015 were used for comparison (control group). Various parameters were compared between the TNCCI and control groups. RESULTS Time taken to reduce WON (6 vs 32 days, P = 0.001), implementation rate of endoscopic necrosectomy (0% vs 55.6%, P = 0.01), and number of endoscopic necrosectomy sessions per patient (0 vs 0.8 ± 1.0, P = 0.008) were significantly lower in the TNCCI group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Walled-off necrosis can be effectively and safely treated by endoscopic drainage with a DPS and TNCCI. This technique can be an alternative therapeutic option before carrying out endoscopic necrosectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Tamura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Tanioka
- Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yuki Kawaji
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Junya Nuta
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Keiichi Hatamaru
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yasunobu Yamashita
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takeichi Yoshida
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Ida
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takao Maekita
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Mikitaka Iguchi
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Walled of pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is a new term coined for encapsulated fluid collection developing after acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP). It is a heterogeneous collection containing varying amount of liquid as well as solid necrotic material. The literature on its natural history as well as appropriate management is gradually expanding thereby improving treatment outcomes of this enigmatic disease. Areas covered: This review discusses currently available literature on etiology, frequency, natural history, and imaging features WOPN. Also, updated treatment options including endoscopic, radiological and surgical drainage are discussed. Expert opinion: WOPN is alocal complication of ANP occurring in the delayed phase of ANP and may be asymptomatic (50%) or present with pain, fever, jaundice, or gastric outlet obstruction. Natural courses of asymptomatic WOPN have been infrequently studied, and it appears that the majority remain asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously. Magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasound are the best imaging modalities to evaluate solid necrotic debris. Symptomatic WOPN usually needs immediate drainage, this can be done endoscopically, radiologically, or surgically. Current evidence suggests that endoscopic transluminal drainage is the preferred drainage technique as it is effective and associated with lower mortality, risk of organ failure, adverse effects, and length of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surinder Singh Rana
- a Department of Gastroenterology , Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) , Chandigarh , India
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yao Y, Zhang D, Guo J, Qi K, Li F, Zhu J, Wang D, Chen J, Xu C, Wang L, Wang K, Jin Z, Li Z. A novel self-expanding biflanged metal stent vs tubular metal stent for EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: A retrospective, cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e14179. [PMID: 30653165 PMCID: PMC6370115 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000014179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with metal stents is generally preferred over plastic stents, its superiority among different types of metal stents has not yet been well studied. We conducted this study to compare clinical outcomes and complications of a novel self-expanding biflanged metal stent (BFMS) and a traditional-shaped tubular metal stent (TMS) in treating pancreatic pseudocyst (PPC).This was a retrospective analysis on consecutive patients with PPC underwent EUS-guided transmural drainage with either TMS or BFMS in a single tertiary center with expertise in management of complex biliary and pancreatic problems. The technical and functional success rate, reintervention, complications, and recurrence rate were evaluated.From September 2013 to January 2018, 125 patients (66.4% male, median age 47 years) underwent EUS-guided transmural drainage for PPC. Among them, 49 used TMS and 76 used BFMS. All patients met the inclusion criteria that cyst diameter was >6 cm or the distance between cyst and stomach wall was shorter than 1 cm. There was no difference in technical success (98% vs 97.4%, P = 1.0) or functional success rate (87.8% vs 92.1%, P = .54) using 2 types of metal stents. However, more procedure related complications occurred in TMS than in BFMS group. TMS group had a much higher migration rate than BFMS group (14.6% vs 0, P = .001), even though there was no significant difference in bleeding, infection, or death rate between 2 groups. With similar clinical outcomes, TMS group required more additional plastic stent placement than BFMS group for better drainage.TMS and BFMS placement can both be considered as methods of endoscopic transmural PPC drainage with equal efficacy, whereas BFMS could be preferred for fewer complications or less need of additional plastic stent placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| | - Dingguo Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jiefang Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| | - Ke Qi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| | - Feng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital, Tyler, TX
| | - Jianwei Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| | - Dong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| | - Can Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| | - Luowei Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| | - Kaixuan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| | - Zhendong Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| | - Zhaoshen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Valverde-López F, Wilcox CM, Redondo-Cerezo E. Evaluation and management of acute pancreatitis in Spain. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2018; 41:618-628. [PMID: 30149943 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2018] [Revised: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
32
|
Lumen Apposing Metal Stents (LAMSs) for Drainage of Pancreatic and Gallbladder Collections: A Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 52:835-844. [PMID: 29016384 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000000934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage using lumen apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is becoming a popular and promising therapeutic approach for drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections. There has been an increasing number of studies evaluating LAMS for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP), walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN), and gallbladder (GB) drainage. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the literature to date regarding the clinical success, technical success, and adverse events of LAMS in treatment of pancreatic fluid collections and GB drainage. METHODS A comprehensive search of multiple literature databases through November 2016 was performed. Human studies with at least 10 subjects that examined the clinical success, technical success, and adverse events of LAMS in treating PP, WOPN, and GB drainage were included. RESULTS A total of 993 patients (608-WOPN; 204-PP; 181-GB drainage) underwent drainage from 20 trials. For drainage of WOPN, the pooled technical success was 98.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 98.2% to 99.7%] and clinical success was 90% (95% CI: 87% to 93%) (τ=0.001). For drainage of PP, the pooled technical success was 97% (95% CI: 95% to 99%) and clinical success was 98% (95% CI: 96% to 100%), (τ=0.001). For GB drainage, the pooled technical success was 95% (95% CI: 91% to 99%) and clinical success was 93% (95% CI: 90% to 97%), (τ=0.001). Total adverse events occurred in 11% of patients with higher complication rates observed in GB drainage. There was no evidence of publication bias in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage using LAMS is becoming a widely accepted therapeutic approach for the treatment of PP, WOPN, and GB drainage with high clinical and technical success rates and acceptable adverse events. Further prospective randomized trials reporting long-term clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness are needed to validate LAMS as a therapeutic modality for pancreatic and GB collections.
Collapse
|
33
|
Jiang TA, Xie LT. Algorithm for the multidisciplinary management of hemorrhage in EUS-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collections. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6:308-321. [PMID: 30283794 PMCID: PMC6163138 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i10.308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), common sequelae of acute or chronic pancreatitis, are broadly classified as pancreatic pseudocysts or walled-off necrosis according to the revised Atlanta classification. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is often considered a standard first-line therapy preferable to surgical or interventional radiology approaches for patients with symptomatic PFC. EUS-guided drainage is effective and successful; it has a technical success rate of 90%-100% and a clinical success rate of 85%-98%. Recent studies have shown a 5%-30% adverse events (AEs) rate for the procedure. The most common AEs include infection, hemorrhage, perforation and stent migration. Hemorrhage, a severe and sometimes deadly outcome, requires a well-organized and appropriate treatment strategy. However, few studies have reported the integrated management of hemorrhage during EUS-guided drainage of PFC. Establishing a practical therapeutic strategy is an essential and significant step in standardized management. The aim of this review is to describe the current situation of EUS-guided drainage of PFCs, including the etiology and treatment of procedure-related bleeding as well as current problems and future perspectives. We propose a novel and meaningful algorithm for systematically managing hemorrhage events. To our limited knowledge, a multidisciplinary algorithm for managing EUS-guided drainage for PFC-related bleeding has not been previously reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian-An Jiang
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Li-Ting Xie
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Falk V, Kenshil S, Sandha S, Teshima C, D'Souza P, Sandha G. The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2018; 3:26-35. [PMID: 34169224 PMCID: PMC8218535 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwy049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While most pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) resolve spontaneously, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) may be necessary. EUS-TD has evolved from multiple double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) to fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). This study compares clinical attributes of DPPS, FCSEMS and LAMS. Methods This is a single-centre retrospective review of EUS-TD for PFCs. The primary outcome was clinical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure time, hospital length of stay (HLOS), number of endoscopies, need for necrosectomy, adverse events (AEs) and overall cost. Results Fifty-eight patients (37 male, average age 49 years) underwent a total of 60 EUS-TD procedures for PFCs (average size 11.2 cm with 29 pseudocysts and 29 walled-off necrosis). Ten patients (17%) underwent EUS-TD with DPPS and 48 patients (83%) with metal stents (32 FCSEMS, 16 LAMS). Overall technical and clinical success was 100% and 84%, respectively. Lumen-apposing metal stents had shorter procedure times (14.9 versus 63.6 DPPS, 39.1 min FCSEMS, P < 0.001), and no difference in AEs (3 of 16 versus 4 of 10 DPPS, 12 of 34 FCSEMS, ns). Double-pigtail plastic stents required more endoscopies (3.7 versus 2.3 LAMS, 2.3 FCSEMS, P = 0.013) and necrosectomies (4 of 10 [40%]) compared with 5 of 34 [15%] in the FCSEMS group and 3 of 16 [19%] in the LAMS group, respectively, P = 0.001) to achieve clinical resolution. The overall cost and HLOS was not significantly different between groups. Conclusion The use of LAMS for PFCs is not associated with any significant increase in cost despite technical (shorter procedure time) and clinical advantages (shorter indwell time, reduced need for necrosectomy and no increase in AEs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Falk
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Sana Kenshil
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simrat Sandha
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christopher Teshima
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pernilla D'Souza
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gurpal Sandha
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
The last decade has seen dramatic shift in paradigm in the management of pancreatic fluid collections with the rise of endoscopic therapy over radiologic or surgical management. Endosonographic drainage is now considered the gold standard therapy for pancreatic pseudocyst. Infected pancreatic necroses are being offered endoscopic necrosectomy that has been facilitated by the arrival on the market of large diameter lumen-apposing metal stent. Severe pancreatitis or failure to thrive should receive enteral nutrition while pancreatic ductal disruption or strictures are best treated by pancreatic stenting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman Andalib
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hammad T, Khan MA, Alastal Y, Lee W, Nawras A, Ismail MK, Kahaleh M. Efficacy and Safety of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Are They Better Than Plastic Stents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63:289-301. [PMID: 29282638 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4851-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage has been increasingly utilized as a first-line therapeutic modality for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC). Recently, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been utilized for management of PFCs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the cumulative efficacy and safety of LAMS in the management of PFC (primary outcome). We also compared the efficacy and safety of LAMS with multiple plastic stents (MPS) in the management of PFC (secondary outcome). METHODS We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases from inception to November 5, 2016, to identify studies (with ≥ 10 patients) reporting technical success, clinical success, and adverse events (AE) of EUS-guided transmural drainage of PFC using LAMS. Weighted pooled rates (WPR) were calculated for technical success, clinical success and AE. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated and pooled to compare LAMS with MPS in terms of technical success, clinical success, and AE. Pooled mean difference (MD) was calculated to compare the number of endoscopic sessions required by each type of stent to achieve clinical success. All analyses were done using random effects model. RESULTS Eleven studies with 688 patients were included in this meta-analysis. WPR for technical success of LAMS in PFC management was 98% (96, 99%), (I 2 = 15%). WPR for clinical success was 93% (89, 96%) with moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 50%). There was no difference in clinical success for pseudocysts (PP) versus walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) (P = 0.51). WPR for AE was 13% (9, 20%), (I 2 = 64%). AE were 10% more in WON as compared to PP (P = 0.009). Most common AE requiring intervention was stent migration (4.2%), followed by infection (3.8%), bleeding (2.4%), and stent occlusion (1.9%). Six studies with 504 patients compared the performance of LAMS with MPS. Pooled RR for technical success was 1.71 (0.38, 7.37). Pooled RR for clinical success was 0.37 (0.20, 0.67) in favor of LAMS. Pooled RR for AE was 0.39 (0.18, 0.84), (I 2 = 50%). Pooled MD for number of endoscopic sessions was - 0.84 (- 1.69, 0.01). CONCLUSIONS LAMS seem to have excellent efficacy and safety in the management of PFCs. They may be preferred over plastic stents as they are associated with better clinical success and lesser adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariq Hammad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Muhammad Ali Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Yaseen Alastal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Wade Lee
- Carlson and Mulford Libraries, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Ali Nawras
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Mohammad Kashif Ismail
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1305 York Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Metal stents versus plastic stents for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87:30-42.e15. [PMID: 28867073 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2017] [Accepted: 08/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic transluminal drainage of symptomatic walled-off necrosis (WON) is a good management option, although the optimal choice of drainage site stent is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare metal stents (MSs) and plastic stents (PSs) in terms of WON resolution, likelihood of resolution after 1 procedure, and adverse events. METHODS An expert librarian queried several databases to identify studies that assessed WON management, and selection was according to a priori criteria. Publication bias, heterogeneity, and study quality were evaluated with the appropriate tools. We performed single and 2-arm meta-analyses for noncomparative and comparative studies using event rate random-effects model and odds ratio (OR)/difference in means, respectively. RESULTS We included 41 studies involving 2213 patients. In 2-arm study meta-analysis, WON resolution was more likely with MSs compared with PSs (OR, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.6; P < .001). Resolution with a single endoscopic procedure was similar between stents (47% vs 44%), although for those cases requiring more than 1 intervention, the MS group had fewer interventions, favored by a mean difference of -.9 procedures (95% CI, -1.283 to -.561). In single-arm study meta-analysis, when compared with PSs, MS use was associated with lower bleeding (5.6% vs 12.6%; P = .02), a trend toward lower perforation and stent occlusion (2.8% vs 4.3%, P = .2, and 9.5% vs 17.4%, P = .07), although with higher migration (8.1% vs 5.1%; P = .1). CONCLUSION Evidence suggests that MSs are superior for WON resolution, with fewer bleeding events, trend toward less occlusion and perforation rate, but increased migration rate compared with PSs.
Collapse
|
38
|
Consiglieri CF, Gornals JB, Busquets J, Peláez N, Secanella L, De-La-Hera M, Sanzol R, Fabregat J, Castellote J. Fluoroscopy-assisted vs fluoroless endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: A comparative study. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2017; 41:12-21. [PMID: 28882615 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The need for fluoroscopy guidance in patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TMD) of peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) remains unclear. AIMS The aim of this study was to compare general outcomes of EUS-TMD of PFCs under fluoroscopy (F) vs fluoroless (FL). METHODS This is a comparative study with a retrospective analysis of a prospective and consecutive inclusion database at a tertiary centre, from 2009 to 2015. All patients were symptomatic pseudocyst (PSC) and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). Two groups were assigned depending on availability of fluoroscopy. The groups were heterogeneous in terms of their demographic characteristics, PFCs and procedure. The main outcome measures included technical and clinical success, incidences, adverse events (AEs), and follow-up. RESULTS Fifty EUS-TMD of PFCs from 86 EUS-guided drainages were included during the study period. Group F included 26 procedures, PSC 69.2%, WON 30.8%, metal stents 61.5% (46.1% lumen-apposing stent) and plastic stents 38.5%. Group FL included 24 procedures, PSC 37.5%, WON 62.5%, and metal stents 95.8% (lumen-apposing stents). Technical success was 100% in both groups, and clinical success was similar (F 88.5%, FL 87.5%). Technical incidences and intra-procedure AEs were only described in group F (7.6% and 11.5%, respectively) and none in group FL. Procedure time was less in group FL (8min, p=0.0341). CONCLUSIONS Fluoroless in the EUS-TMD of PFCs does not involve more technical incidences or intra-procedure AEs. Technical and clinical success was similar in the two groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia F Consiglieri
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Joan B Gornals
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| | - Juli Busquets
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Nuria Peláez
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Lluis Secanella
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Meritxell De-La-Hera
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Resurrección Sanzol
- Anaesthesia Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Joan Fabregat
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - José Castellote
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Extended Cystogastrostomy with Hydrogen Peroxide Irrigation Facilitates Endoscopic Pancreatic Necrosectomy. DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY 2017; 2017:7145803. [PMID: 29056844 PMCID: PMC5605784 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7145803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2017] [Revised: 07/02/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is a major complication of acute pancreatitis. We hypothesized that an extended (2 cm) cystogastrostomy opening combined with hydrogen peroxide irrigation can increase the success of endoscopic necrosectomy and decrease the number of required endoscopic interventions. The aim of the study is to assess the safety and feasibility of the technique in the management of WOPN. METHODS This is a retrospective chart review of all cases that underwent EUS with extended cystogastrostomy and hydrogen peroxide irrigation prior to necrosectomy in a tertiary referral medical center. Clinical success was defined as complete resolution of the cyst cavity or a cyst cavity less than 2 cm in size on follow-up imaging. RESULTS 19 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. The mean size of the walled-off cavity was 11 + 0.9 cm. Technical success of the procedure was 100%. The median number of necrosectomy sessions was 2 (range 1 to 7). Cavity resolution was noted in 18 out of 19 patients resulting in a clinical success of 94.7%. The median follow-up period was 12 months. The adverse events rate in our cohort was 15.7%. CONCLUSION Extended cystogastrostomy coupled with hydrogen peroxide irrigation of WOPN cavity is safe and feasible.
Collapse
|
40
|
Bansal RK, Puri R, Choudhary NS, Bhatia S, Patel N, Patle SK, Patil GK, Agarwal A, Prabha C, Sud R. Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck - make it an easy row to hoe. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5:E847-E853. [PMID: 28924588 PMCID: PMC5595574 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-112854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success rate and the option of necrosectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS guided drainage of patients with WON by using FCSEMS and intracavitary lavage with a solution containing hydrogen peroxide and adopting a step-up approach. METHODS A prospective open label study was carried out at a single tertiary care center between January 2014 and January 2016. Patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS guided drainage followed by FCSEMS placement were included. Primary end points were complete drainage with improvement in symptoms or major adverse events. Secondary end points were minor adverse events related to the procedures. RESULTS A total of 64 patients (mean age 36 years; 52 males) were included. Technical success was achieved in 100 % of patients and clinical success was achieved in 90.6 %. Complete drainage was achieved with FCSEMS alone in 18 (28.1 %), FCSEMS with necrosectomy using lavage in 40 (62.5 %), FCSEMS with percutaneous drainage (PCD) in 5 (7.8 %), and 1 (1.6 %) patient required salvage surgery. The major adverse event was life threatening bleeding in 3 (4.7 %) patients. Minor adverse events were non-life threatening bleeding in 2 (3.1 %) patients and stent migration in 3 (4.7 %) patients. CONCLUSION EUS guided WON drainage with FCSEMS followed by necrosectomy with lavage using a solution containing hydrogen peroxide as a step-up approach is a minimally invasive and effective method with a high technical and clinical success rate. Patients with solid debris > 40 % need aggressive management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinkesh Kumar Bansal
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Rajesh Puri
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India,Corresponding author Dr Rajesh Puri Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary SciencesMedanta The MedicitySector 38GurugramDelhi NCRIndiaPIN 122001
| | - Narendra S. Choudhary
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Sumit Bhatia
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Nisharg Patel
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Saurabh K. Patle
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Gaurav K. Patil
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Amit Agarwal
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Chandra Prabha
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Randhir Sud
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Saumoy M, Kahaleh M. Superiority of metal stents for pancreatic walled-off necrosis: bigger is better! Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85:1253-1254. [PMID: 28522015 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Saumoy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weil Cornell Medical, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weil Cornell Medical, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Endoscopic "step-up approach" using a dedicated biflanged metal stent reduces the need for direct necrosectomy in walled-off necrosis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85:1243-1252. [PMID: 27845053 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS-guided drainage using plastic stents may be inadequate for treatment of walled-off necrosis (WON). Recent studies report variable outcomes even when using covered metal stents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a dedicated covered biflanged metal stent (BFMS) when adopting an endoscopic "step-up approach" for drainage of symptomatic WON. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS-guided drainage using BFMSs over a 3-year period. Reassessment was done between 48 and 72 hours for resolution. Endoscopic reinterventions were tailored in nonresponders in a stepwise manner. Step 1 encompassed declogging the blocked lumen of the BFMS. In step 2, a nasocystic tube was placed via BFMSs with intermittent irrigation. Step 3 involved direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN). BFMSs were removed between 4 and 8 weeks of follow-up. The main outcome measures were technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and need for DEN. RESULTS Two hundred five WON patients underwent EUS-guided drainage using BFMSs. Technical success was achieved in 203 patients (99%). Periprocedure adverse events occurred in 8 patients (bleeding in 6, perforation in 2). Clinical success with BFMSs alone was seen in 153 patients (74.6%). Reintervention adopting the step-up approach was required in 49 patients (23.9%). Incremental success was achieved in 10 patients with step 1, 16 patients with step 2, and 19 patients with step 3. Overall clinical success was achieved in 198 patients (96.5%), with DEN required in 9.2%. Four patients failed treatment and required surgery (2) or percutaneous drainage (2). CONCLUSIONS The endoscopic step-up approach using BFMSs was safe, effective, and yielded successful outcomes in most patients, reducing the need for DEN.
Collapse
|
43
|
Bank JS, Adler DG. Lumen apposing metal stents: A review of current uses and outcomes. GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2017. [DOI: 10.18528/gii160033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S. Bank
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Douglas G. Adler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Guo J, Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Fusaroli P, Giovannini M, Mishra G, Rana SS, Ho S, Poley JW, Ang TL, Kalaitzakis E, Siddiqui AA, De La Mora-Levy JG, Lakhtakia S, Bhutani MS, Sharma M, Mukai S, Garg PK, Lee LS, Vila JJ, Artifon E, Adler DG, Sun S. A multi-institutional consensus on how to perform endoscopic ultrasound-guided peri-pancreatic fluid collection drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6:285-291. [PMID: 29063871 PMCID: PMC5664848 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_85_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a lack of consensus on how endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pseudocyst drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy should be performed. This survey was carried out amongst members of the EUS Journal Editorial Board to describe their practices in performing this procedure. This was a worldwide multi-institutional survey amongst members of the EUS Journal Editorial Board in May 2017. The responses to a 22-question survey with respect to the practice of EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy were obtained. Twenty-two endoscopists responded to the questionnaire as follows: 72.7% (16/22) were of the opinion that lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) should be the standard of care for the creation of an endoscopic cystenterostomy in patients with pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON); 95.5% (21/22) recommended large diameter (d=15 mm) LAMS for drainage in patients with WON; 54.5% (12/22) would not dilate LAMS after placement into the WOPN; 86.4% (19/22) would not perform endoscopic necrosectomy during the same procedure as the creation of the cystenterostomy; 45.5% (10/22) recommend that agents, such as diluted hydrogen peroxide, should be used to lavage the peri-pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) cavity in patients with WON; and 45.5% (10/22) considered a naso-cystic or other tube to be necessary for lavage of WON after initial drainage. The mean optimal interval recommended for endoscopic necrosectomy procedures after EUS-guided drainage was 6.23 days. The mean optimal interval recommended for repeat imaging in patients undergoing endoscopic necrosectomy was 12.32 days. The mean time recommended for LAMS removal was 4.59 weeks. This is the first worldwide survey on the practice of EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy. There were wide variations in practice and randomized studies are urgently needed to establish the best approach for management of this condition. There is also a pressing need to establish a best practice consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jintao Guo
- Endoscopy Center, Sheng Jing Hospital of Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Department of Endoscopy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania
| | - Peter Vilmann
- Endoscopy Department, GastroUnit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Pathology Unit (Flora Poizat), Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Surinder S Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sammy Ho
- Montefiore Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tiing Leong Ang
- Gastroenterology Department, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Evangelos Kalaitzakis
- Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Disease Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ali A Siddiqui
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Sundeep Lakhtakia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, USA
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Malay Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jaswant Rai Specialty Hospital, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, USA
| | - Shuntaro Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pramod Kumar Garg
- Department of Gastroenterology, All Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Linda S Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Juan J Vila
- Endoscopy Unit, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Everson Artifon
- Department of Surgery, Ana Costa Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Siyu Sun
- Endoscopy Center, Sheng Jing Hospital of Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rodrigues-Pinto E, Baron TH. Evaluation of the AXIOS stent for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016; 13:793-805. [PMID: 27545192 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1222898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic ultrasound guided translumenal drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) has been widely practiced for over a decade, using conventional plastic and self-expandable metal stents. The use of such stents for transmural drainage is off-label and limited by the lack of lumen-to-lumen anchorage, which can lead to leakage, migration and tissue trauma. AREAS COVERED Novel stent designs dedicated to applications of translumenal drainage have recently emerged and promise to make transmural drainage quicker, safer, and more effective. Achieving faster resolution of the fluid collection, decreasing adverse events, decreasing recurrence rates, and lowering costs are critical to advancing the endoscopic management of PFCs. Expert commentary: Our paper suggests that the AXIOS stent is an innovative therapeutic approach for PFC drainage with excellent efficacy, safety, and relatively few adverse outcomes. Preliminary reports appear promising and large multicenter prospective studies are needed in the future to further determine its safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Todd H Baron
- b Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill , North Carolina , USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Predictors of successful non-operative management of grade III & IV blunt pancreatic trauma. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2016; 10:103-9. [PMID: 27594995 PMCID: PMC4995476 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Revised: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although surgery is the preferred treatment for grade III&IV pancreatic trauma, there is a growing movement for non-operative management. in blunt pancreatic trauma. Very few studies compare operative versus non-operative management in adult patients. Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed from 2004 to 2013 in the department of gastrointestinal surgery, NIMS, Hyderabad. Comparative analysis was performed between patients who failed versus those who were successfully managed with non-operative management. Results 34 patients had grade III/IV trauma out of which 8 were operated early with the remaining 26 initially under a NOM strategy, 10 of them could be successfully managed without any operation. Post-traumatic pancreatitis, Necrotizing pancreatitis, Ileus, contusion on CT, surrounding organ injuries are independently associated with failure of NOM on a univariate analysis. On multivariate logistic regression presence of necrosis& associated organ injury are factors that predict failure of NOM independently. Development of a pseudocyst is the only significant factor that is associated with a success of NOM. Conclusions Non-operative measures should be attempted in a select group of grade III&IV blunt pancreatic trauma. In hemodynamically stable patients with a controlled leak walled off as a pseudocyst without associated organ injuries and pancreatic necrosis, NOM has a higher success rate. Non-operative measures should be attempted in a select group of high grade (grade III/IV) pancreatic trauma. Controlled leak walled off as a pseudocyst, absent necrosis&organ injuries predict high success rate for NOM. Dedicated nutritional, gastrointestinal and interventional radiological support are the key components of care.
Collapse
|