1
|
Brand M, Fuchs KH, Troya J, Hann A, Meining A. The Role of Specialized Instruments for Advanced Endoscopic Resections in Gastrointestinal Disease. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2177. [PMID: 38004317 PMCID: PMC10672436 DOI: 10.3390/life13112177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advanced endoscopic therapy techniques have been developed and have created alternative treatment options to surgical therapy for several gastrointestinal diseases. This work will focus on new endoscopic tools for special indications of advanced endoscopic resections (ER), especially endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), which were developed in our institution. This paper aims to analyze these specialized instruments and identify their status. METHODS Initially, the technical process of ESD was analyzed, and the following limitations of the different endoscopic steps and the necessary manipulations were determined: the problem of traction-countertraction, the grasping force needed to pull on tissue, the instrument tip maneuverability, the limited angulation/triangulation, and the mobility of the scope and instruments. Five instruments developed by our team were used: the Endo-dissector, additional working channel system, external independent next-to-the-scope grasper, 3D overtube working station, and over-the-scope grasper. The instruments were used and applied according to their special functions in dry lab, experimental in vivo, and clinical conditions by the members of our team. RESULTS The Endo-dissector has a two-fold function: (1) grasping submucosal tissue with enough precision and strength to pull it off the surrounding mucosa and muscle, avoiding damage during energy application and (2) effectively dividing tissue using monopolar energy. The AWC system quickly fulfills the lack of a second working channel as needed to complete the endoscopic task on demand. The EINTS grasper can deliver a serious grasping force, which may be necessary for a traction-countertraction situation during endoscopic resection for lifting a larger specimen. The 3D overtube multifunctional platform provides surgical-like work with bimanual-operated instruments at the tip of the scope, which allows for a coordinated approach during lesion treatment. The OTSG is a grasping tool with very special features for cleaning cavities with debris. CONCLUSIONS The research and development of instruments with special features can solve unmet needs in advanced endoscopic procedures. The latter may help to increase indications for the endoscopic resections of gut lesions in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karl-Hermann Fuchs
- Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany; (M.B.); (J.T.); (A.M.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knoop RF, Amanzada A, Petzold G, Ellenrieder V, Engelhardt M, Neesse A, Bremer SCB, Kunsch S. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection with an external additional working channel (EMR+ and ESD+) are equivalent to using a double-channel endoscope: a systematic evaluation in a porcine ex vivo model. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7749-7758. [PMID: 37567979 PMCID: PMC10520185 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10295-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS With an external additional working channel (AWC) endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as well as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be extended to techniques termed "EMR+" and "ESD+." These novel techniques are systematically compared to EMR and ESD under the use of a double-channel endoscope (DC). METHODS Our trial was conducted prospectively in a pre-clinical porcine animal model (EASIE-R simulator) with standardized gastric lesions measuring 3 or 4 cm. RESULTS EMR+ and EMR DC showed both good results for 3 cm lesions with no adverse events and an en bloc resection rate of 73.33% (EMR+) and 60.00% (EMR DC, p = 0.70). They came to their limits in 4 cm lesions with muscularis damages of 20.00% (EMR+), 13.33% (EMR DC, p ≥ 0.99) and decreasing en bloc resection rates of 60.00% (EMR+) and 46.67% (EMR DC, p = 0.72). ESD+ and ESD DC were both reliable concerning en bloc resection rates (100% in all groups) and adverse events (0.00% in 3 cm lesions, 12.50% muscularis damages in both ESD+ and ESD DC in 4 cm lesions). Resection time was slightly shorter in all groups with the AWC compared to DC although only reaching significance in 3 cm ESD lesions (p < 0.05*). CONCLUSIONS With the AWC, a standard endoscope can easily be transformed to double-channel functionality. We could show that EMR+ and ESD+ are non-inferior to EMR and ESD under the use of a double-channel endoscope. Consequently, the AWC presents an affordable alternative to a double-channel endoscope for both EMR and ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard F Knoop
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Ahmad Amanzada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Golo Petzold
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Volker Ellenrieder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Michael Engelhardt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Rems-Murr-Hospital, Winnenden, Germany
| | - Albrecht Neesse
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Sebastian C B Bremer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Steffen Kunsch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Rems-Murr-Hospital, Winnenden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maselli R, Spadaccini M, Galtieri PA, Badalamenti M, Ferrara EC, Pellegatta G, Capogreco A, Carrara S, Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Hassan C, Repici A. Pilot study on a new endoscopic platform for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848221104953. [PMID: 37457137 PMCID: PMC10338719 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221104953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically demanding and time-consuming procedure, with an increased risk of adverse events compared to standard endoscopic resection techniques. The main difficulties are related to the instability of the operating field and to the loss of traction. We aimed to evaluate in a pilot trial a new endoscopic platform [tissue retractor system (TRS); ORISE, Boston scientific Co., Marlborough, MA, USA], designed to stabilize the intraluminal space, and to provide tissue retraction and counter traction. Method We prospectively enrolled all consecutive patients who underwent an ESD for sigmoid/rectal lesions. The primary outcome was the rate of technical feasibility. Further technical aspects such as en-bloc and R0 resection rate, number of graspers used, circumferential incision time, TRS assemblage time, submucosal dissection time, and submucosal dissection speed were provided. Clinical outcomes (recurrence rate and adverse events) were recorded as well. Results In all, 10 patients (M/F 4/6, age: 70.4 ± 11.0 years old) were enrolled. Eight out of 10 lesions were located in the rectum. Average lesion size was 31.2 ± 2.7 mm, and mean lesion area was 1628.88 ± 205.3 mm2. The two sigmoid lesions were removed through standard ESD, because the platform assemblage failed after several attempts. All rectal lesions were removed in an en-bloc fashion. R0 resection was achieved in 7/8 (87.5%) patients in an average procedure time of 60.5 ± 23.3 min. None of the patients developed neither intraprocedural nor postprocedural adverse events. Conclusion TRS-assisted ESD is a feasible option when used in the rectum, with promising result in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes. Nevertheless, our pilot study underlines few technical limitations of the present platform that need to be overcome before the system could be widely and routinely used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Piera Alessia Galtieri
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Badalamenti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Chiara Ferrara
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Pellegatta
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Capogreco
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Azzolini F, Mandarino FV, Barchi A, Biamonte P, Napolitano M, Esposito D, Danese S. Novel approach to endoscopic submucosal dissection using an additional working channel: a case report. Endoscopy 2022; 54:E652-E653. [PMID: 35120384 DOI: 10.1055/a-1732-7113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Azzolini
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Vito Mandarino
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Barchi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Biamonte
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Napolitano
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Esposito
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mann R, Gajendran M, Umapathy C, Perisetti A, Goyal H, Saligram S, Echavarria J. Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:728704. [PMID: 35127735 PMCID: PMC8811151 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.728704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps and sessile serrated lesions. Screening colonoscopy and therapeutic polypectomy can potentially reduce colorectal cancer burden by early detection and removal of these polyps, thus decreasing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Most endoscopists are skilled in detecting and removing the vast majority of polyps endoscopically during a routine colonoscopy. Polyps can be considered “complex” based on size, location, morphology, underlying scar tissue, which are not amenable to removal by conventional endoscopic polypectomy techniques. They are technically more challenging to resect and carry an increased risk of complications. Most of these polyps were used to be managed by surgical intervention in the past. Rapid advancement in endoscopic resection techniques has led to a decreasing role of surgery in managing these complex polyps. These endoscopic resection techniques do require an expert in the field and advanced equipment to perform the procedure. In this review, we discuss various advanced endoscopic techniques for the management of complex polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupinder Mann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Agnes Medical Center, Fresno, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Rupinder Mann
| | - Mahesh Gajendran
- Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, United States
| | - Chandraprakash Umapathy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Abhilash Perisetti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States
| | - Hemant Goyal
- The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, PA, United States
| | - Shreyas Saligram
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Juan Echavarria
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mirza KL, Wickham CJ, Noren ER, Shin J, Cologne KG, Lee SW. Full-Thickness Laparoendoscopic Excision for Management of Complex Colon Polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:1559-1563. [PMID: 34596631 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benign colon polyps are increasingly being detected because of improved colonoscopic screening and early detection of masses on the adenoma-to-carcinoma pathway. Full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision is a colon-preserving technique for endoscopically unresectable polyps consisting of endoscopically guided nonanatomic wedge colectomy. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the safety and success of full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision compared to segmental colectomy for complex polyps not amenable to endoscopic resection. DESIGN This is a retrospective case-control study. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. PATIENTS A prospectively maintained institutional database identified 22 patients with benign complex polyps managed with full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision from 2015 to 2020. These patients were compared with 22 propensity score-matched controls from the same database that underwent laparoscopic segmental colectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was inpatient length of stay. Secondary outcomes included operative details and postoperative morbidities. RESULTS Full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision was successful in all patients. Patients had a median age of 64 years (41-85), and 82% were men. Final pathology revealed complete excision of benign lesions in 20 of 22 patients and adenocarcinoma in 2 of 22. For the adenocarcinomas, 1 patient underwent subsequent elective colectomy without complications, and 1 patient declined surgery. Propensity score matching was successful for age, sex, BMI, ASA score, colon location, and prior abdominal surgery. Compared with controls, cases had significantly shorter operative time (89.5 minutes (46-290) vs 122 minutes (85-200), p = 0.009), length of stay (1 day (0-17) vs 3 days (1-8), p < 0.001), and reduced blood loss (5 mL (2-15) vs 25 mL (10-150), p < 0.001). Thirty-day morbidity (9.1% vs 27.3%, p = 0.240) was not significantly different. An unplanned 30-day reoperation was performed in 1 patient for suspected small-bowel obstruction. There was 1 mortality due to decompensated cirrhosis in the treatment group. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its single-institution retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS Full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision is safe and successful compared with corresponding segmental colectomy for complex polyps. Favorable postoperative outcomes, including decreased operative time, length of stay, and blood loss, make it a useful approach for managing complex polyps throughout the colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasim L Mirza
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoffman A, Atreya R, Rath T, Neurath MF. Current Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Gastrointestinal Lesions: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Submucosal Dissection, and Full-Thickness Resection. Visc Med 2021; 37:358-371. [PMID: 34722719 DOI: 10.1159/000515354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic resection of dysplastic lesions in early stages of cancer reduces mortality rates and is recommended by many national guidelines throughout the world. Snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are established techniques of polyp removal. The advantages of these methods are their relatively short procedure times and acceptable complication rates. The latter include delayed bleeding in 0.9% and a perforation risk of 0.4-1.3%, depending on the size and location of the resected lesion. EMR is a recent modification of endoscopic resection. A limited number of studies suggest that larger lesions can be removed en bloc with low complication rates and short procedure times. Novel techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are used to enhance en bloc resection rates for larger, flat, or sessile lesions. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is employed for non-lifting lesions or those not easily amenable to resection. Procedures such as ESD or EFTR are emerging standards for lesions inaccessible to EMR techniques. Summary Endoscopic treatment is now regarded as first-line therapy for benign lesions. Key Message Endoscopic resection of dysplastic lesions or early stages of cancer is recommended. A plethora of different techniques can be used dependent on the lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Hoffman
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Aschaffenburg-Alzenau Clinic, Aschaffenburg, Germany
| | - Raja Atreya
- First Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie, DZI, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Timo Rath
- First Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie, DZI, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus Ferdinand Neurath
- First Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie, DZI, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Walter B, Krieger YS, Wilhelm D, Feussner H, Lueth TC, Meining A. Evaluation of improved bi-manual endoscopic resection using a customizable 3D-printed manipulator system designed for use with standard endoscopes: a feasibility study using a porcine ex-vivo model. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E881-E887. [PMID: 34079871 PMCID: PMC8159599 DOI: 10.1055/a-1395-7089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims A major drawback of endoscopic en-bloc resection technique is its inability to perform bimanual tasks. Although endoscopic platforms that enable bimanual tasks are commercially available, they are neither approved for various locations nor adaptable to specific patients and indications. Methods Based on evolution of an adaptive 3D-printable platform concept, system variants with different characteristic properties were evaluated for ESD scenarios, ex-vivo in two locations in the stomach and colorectum. Results In total 28 ESDs were performed (7 antrum, 7 corpus in inversion, 7 cecum, 7 rectum) in a porcine ex-vivo setup. ESD was feasible in 21 cases. Investigated manipulator variants are differently well suited for performing ESD within the varying interventions scenarios. Dual-arm manipulators allowed autonomous ESD, while single-arm flexible manipulators could be used more universally due to their compact design, especially for lesions difficult to access. Pediatric scopes were too frail to guide the overtube-manipulators in extremely angled positions. Working in the rectum was impaired using long-sized manipulator arms. Conclusions The presented endoscopic platform based on 3D-printable and customizable manipulator structures might be a promising approach for future improvement of ESD procedure. With regard to localization, especially flexible manipulators attached to standard endoscopes appear to be most promising for further application of specific and individualised manipulator systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Walter
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Yannick S. Krieger
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Micro Technology and Medical Device Technology (MIMED), Technical University of Munich, Munich Germany
| | - Dirk Wilhelm
- MITI Research Group, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hubertus Feussner
- MITI Research Group, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tim C. Lueth
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Micro Technology and Medical Device Technology (MIMED), Technical University of Munich, Munich Germany
| | - Alexander Meining
- Medical Clinic and Policlinic II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection using a novel robotic system (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:1172-1177. [PMID: 32991869 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS One of the difficulties in performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the lack of retraction during submucosal dissection. The development of the EndoMaster EASE System (EndoMaster Pte Ltd, Singapore) aims to enhance the safety and efficacy of ESD through 2 flexible robotic arms for tissue retraction and dissection. This is a preclinical animal study to evaluate the performance of colorectal ESD using the latest version of the EndoMaster EASE System. METHODS The latest version of the EndoMaster EASE System consists of an independently designed, flexible platform with a built-in endoscopic imaging system and 3 working channels, 2 for the passage of robotic arms and 1 for accessories. In this animal study, the outcome measures were operating time (from starting incision to finishing dissection), completeness of resection, procedure-related adverse events, and limitations of arm manipulation in a narrow working space as assessed by counting the frequency of blind cutting. RESULTS Five ESD procedures were performed in a 66.7-kg porcine model with the animal under general anesthesia. The mean operative time was 73.8 minutes, and the mean size of the specimen resected was 1340 mm2. There was no perforation, although profuse bleeding was encountered during 1 robotic ESD procedure. CONCLUSIONS The current preclinical study confirmed the feasibility of performing colorectal ESD using the latest version of the EndoMaster EASE System. The system was also tested for the ability to manage adverse events including bleeding and perforation. This study provided important preclinical experience for clinical trial.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wickham CJ, Wang J, Mirza KL, Noren ER, Shin J, Lee SW, Cologne KG. "Unresectable" polyp management utilizing advanced endoscopic techniques results in high rate of colon preservation. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2121-2128. [PMID: 33890178 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08499-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE "Endoscopically unresectable" benign polyps identified during screening colonoscopy are often referred for segmental colectomy. Application of advanced endoscopic techniques can increase endoscopic polyp resection, sparing patients the morbidity of colectomy. This retrospective case-control study aimed to evaluate the success of colon preserving resection of "endoscopically unresectable" benign polyps using advanced endoscopic techniques including endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoluminal surgical intervention, full-thickness laparo-endoscopic excision, and combined endo-laparoscopic resection. METHODS A prospectively maintained institutional database identified 95 patients referred for "endoscopically unresectable" benign polyps from 2015 to 2018. Cases were compared to 190 propensity score matched controls from the same database undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy for other reasons. Primary outcome was rate of complete endoscopic polyp removal. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, unplanned 30-day readmission and reoperation, 30-day mortality, and post-procedural complications. RESULTS Advanced endoscopic techniques achieved complete polyp removal without colectomy in 66 patients (70%). Failure was most commonly associated with previously attempted endoscopic resection and occult malignancy. Compared with matched colectomy controls, endoscopic polyp resection resulted in significantly shorter hospital length of stay (1.13 ± 2.41 vs 3.89 ± 4.57 days; p < 0.001), lower unplanned 30-day readmission (1.1% vs 7.7%; p < 0.05), and fewer postoperative complications (4.2% vs 33.9%; p < 0.001). Unplanned 30-day reoperation (2.1% vs 4.4%; p = 0.34) and 30-day mortality (0% vs 0.6%; p = 0.75) trended lower. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic resection of complex polyps can be highly successful, and it is associated with favorable outcomes and decreased morbidity when compared with segmental colon resection. Attempting colon preservation using these techniques is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carey J Wickham
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Jennifer Wang
- University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Kasim L Mirza
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erik R Noren
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joongho Shin
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sang W Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kyle G Cologne
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Double-clip traction could be superior to the pocket-creation method with cylindrical cap for colonic ESD: a randomized study in an ex vivo model. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:1482-1491. [PMID: 33398562 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08171-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In Western countries, debates between ESD vs piece-meal EMR as the best treatment for large colorectal adenomas persist regarding the difficulty of ESD the colon, and the safety and relatively good results of piece-meal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Pocket-creation method (PCM) and double-clip countertraction (DCT) are two strategies recently published to facilitate ESD in this challenging situation. METHOD This is a randomized animal study to compare PCM and DCT strategies for colonic ESD on ex vivo models (bovine colon) performed by 3 operators novice in ESD. Hybridknife type T was used to inject normal saline tinted with a small amount of blue dye in all procedures. Randomization was stratified according to the use of gravity assist. Primary endpoint was the difference in resection speed between PCM and DCT strategies. RESULTS Resection speed was significantly higher in the DCT group than in the PCM group (56.3 vs. 31.6 mm2/min, p = 0.01). Technical success rate, defined as en bloc resection in under 60 min, was significantly better in the DCT group than in the PCM group (100% vs. 84.4%, p = 0.024), perforation rate was lower (0% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.012), and difficulty score was better (2.4 vs. 6.2, p < 0.0001) as was procedure duration (24.2 vs. 40.2 min, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION DCT was superior to PCM for ESD in our validated bovine colon model. This strategy is inexpensive, easy to use and adaptive. It might facilitate the widespread use of colonic ESD in Western countries and change Western ideas regarding the use of colonic ESD compared with piece-meal EMR for large benign lesions.
Collapse
|
12
|
Nishimura M. ESD and Pit Pattern Diagnosis: Lessons from a Japanese Endoscopist Working in the United States. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2020; 33:329-334. [PMID: 33162836 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed in 2000s to overcome the limitations of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), especially to accomplish en-bloc resection, and it has been accepted worldwide in the past decades. Many ESD devices and diagnosis modalities are currently available, which include pit pattern and narrow band imaging (NBI) diagnoses to evaluate the depth of the tumor preoperatively with sensitivities of 70 to 90%. Depending on the Japanese colorectal guideline, the intramucosal cancer and shallow invasion of the submucosal layer are the main good indications of ESD; however, the ESD practices between Japan and Western countries still vary, including pathologic definition of cancer, tumor/node/metastasis classification, and handling of ESD specimen. In the United States, despite the large demand for treatment of colorectal neoplasm, pit pattern and magnified NBI diagnoses are not widely accepted yet, and piecemeal EMR is still the major method in most of the institutions. Moreover, the specific guideline of ESD is also not available yet. More new technologies are being developed other than conventional ESD methods in Eastern and Western countries, and ESD is now expected to change in the next generation. It is recommended that not only gastroenterologists but also colorectal surgeons have appropriate knowledge of colorectal lesions and their management to ensure current treatments is applied to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Nishimura
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Trindade AJ, Kumta NA, Bhutani MS, Chandrasekhara V, Jirapinyo P, Krishnan K, Melson J, Pannala R, Parsi MA, Schulman AR, Trikudanathan G, Watson RR, Maple JT, Lichtenstein DR. Devices and techniques for endoscopic treatment of residual and fibrotic colorectal polyps (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:474-482. [PMID: 32641215 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Residual neoplasia after macroscopically complete EMR of large colon polyps has been reported in 10% to 32% of resections. Often, residual polyps at the site of prior polypectomy are fibrotic and nonlifting, making additional resection challenging. METHODS This document reviews devices and methods for the endoscopic treatment of fibrotic and/or residual polyps. In addition, techniques reported to reduce the incidence of residual neoplasia after endoscopic resection are discussed. RESULTS Descriptions of technologies and available outcomes data are summarized for argon plasma coagulation ablation, snare-tip coagulation, avulsion techniques, grasp-and-snare technique, EndoRotor endoscopic resection system, endoscopic full-thickness resection device, and salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection. CONCLUSIONS Several technologies and techniques discussed in this document may aid in the prevention and/or resection of fibrotic and nonlifting polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind J Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vinay Chandrasekhara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Pichamol Jirapinyo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kumar Krishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joshua Melson
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rahul Pannala
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Mansour A Parsi
- Section for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Allison R Schulman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Guru Trikudanathan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Rabindra R Watson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John T Maple
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - David R Lichtenstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Knoop RF, Wedi E, Petzold G, Bremer SCB, Amanzada A, Ellenrieder V, Neesse A, Kunsch S. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with an additional working channel (ESD+): a novel technique to improve procedure time and safety of ESD. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3506-3512. [PMID: 32676726 PMCID: PMC8195965 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07808-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background and aims A new external additional working channel (AWC) was recently introduced by which endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be converted to a technique termed “ESD+ ”. We aim to systematically evaluate this novel technique in flat gastric lesions and compare it to classical ESD. Methods The study was prospectively conducted in a pre-clinical ex vivo animal model (EASIE-R simulator) with porcine stomachs. Prior to intervention, we set standardized lesions measuring 3 cm or 4 cm in antegrade as well as in retrograde positions. Results Overall, 64 procedures were performed by an experienced endoscopist. Both techniques were reliable and showed en bloc resection rates of 100%. Overall, ESD+ reduced time of procedure compared to ESD (24.5 vs. 32.5 min, p = 0.025*). Particularly, ESD+ was significantly faster in retrograde lesions with a median of 22.5 vs. 34.0 min in 3 cm retrograde lesions (p = 0.002*) and 34.5 vs. 41.0 min (p = 0.011*) in 4 cm retrograde lesions. There were 0 perforations with both techniques. In ESD+ , 1 muscularis damage occurred (3.13%) compared to 6 muscularis damages with ESD (18.75%, p = 0.045*). Conclusions By its grasp-and-mobilize technique, ESD+ allows potentially faster and safer resections of flat gastric lesions compared to conventional ESD in an ex vivo porcine model. The potential advantages of ESD+ in terms of procedure time may be particularly relevant for difficult lesions in retrograde positions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07808-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard F Knoop
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Edris Wedi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Golo Petzold
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Sebastian C B Bremer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ahmad Amanzada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Volker Ellenrieder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Albrecht Neesse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Steffen Kunsch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hossain E, Alkandari A, Bhandari P. Future of Endoscopy: Brief review of current and future endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal lesions. Dig Endosc 2020; 32:503-511. [PMID: 31242329 DOI: 10.1111/den.13475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic treatment of colorectal lesions has seen major developments in the last decade. It is now considered curative for intramucosal and superficial submucosal cancers. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in expert hands has very good outcomes with low complication rates but recurrence and inadequate treatment of early cancers remain an issue. This has led to a technical evolution that can lead to one piece resection of neoplasia. This includes a range of techniques from knife assisted snare resection (KAR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to full thickness resections. This article reviews all the resection techniques and the evidence base behind them.
Collapse
|
16
|
Wedi E, Knoop R, Jung C, Gromski M, Ho CN, Conrad G, Maiss J, Milenovic S, Klemme D, Baulain U, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Ellenrieder V, Koehler P. EMR + with the AWC improves endoscopic resection speed compared to ESD: a porcine ex-vivo pilot study. MINIM INVASIV THER 2019; 30:47-54. [PMID: 31597491 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1673778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To improve resection speed and to reach higher en bloc resection rates in lesions ≥ 2 cm, a novel grasp and snare EMR technique termed "EMR+", accomplished by an additional working channel (AWC), was developed. Its use compared to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is evaluated for the first time. MATERIAL AND METHODS We prospectively conducted a randomized pre-clinical ex-vivo pilot study in explanted porcine stomachs for the comparison of EMR + with classical ESD of mucosal-based lesions. Prior to intervention, we set flat lesions with a standardized size of 3 × 3 cm. RESULTS The median time of procedure was significantly shorter in the EMR + group (median 10.5 min, range 4.4-24 min) than in the ESD group (median 32 min, range 14-61.6 min, p < .0001). The rate of en bloc resection was significantly lower in the EMR + group (38 % vs. 95 %) (p < .0001). Nevertheless, an improvement in the learning curve for EMR + was achieved after the first 12 procedures, with a subsequent en bloc resection rate of 100 %. CONCLUSIONS EMR + could improve the efficiency of mucosal resection procedures. Initial experience demonstrates a higher and satisfactory en bloc resection rate after going through the learning curve of EMR+.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edris Wedi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Richard Knoop
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Carlo Jung
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Mark Gromski
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| | | | | | - Juergen Maiss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Associate Prof. Maiss, Forchheim, Germany
| | - Sinisa Milenovic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
| | - David Klemme
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Baulain
- Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Mariensee, Germany
| | - Ali Seif Amir Hosseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Volker Ellenrieder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Peter Koehler
- Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Mariensee, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
D'Amico F, Maselli R, Galtieri PA, Spadaccini M, Repici A. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a rectal nongranular laterally spreading tumor with the use of a new endoscopic platform. VideoGIE 2019; 4:140-141. [PMID: 30899896 PMCID: PMC6408738 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2018.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinando D'Amico
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Piera Alessia Galtieri
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Walter B, Schmidbaur S, Krieger Y, Meining A. Improved endoscopic resection of large flat lesions and early cancers using an external additional working channel (AWC): a case series. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E298-E301. [PMID: 30746432 PMCID: PMC6368484 DOI: 10.1055/a-0824-6912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background En-bloc resection of large, flat lesions or early stages of cancer is challenging. No bimanual tasks are possible using standard endoscopes. Dual-channel endoscopes are not available everywhere and have a small distance between the channels. Patients and methods A new external additional working channel (AWC) (Ovesco, Tuebingen, Germany) was designed and developed potentially enabling bimanual tasks. Fixed to the tip of a standard gastroscope or pediatric colonoscope, a second endoscopic tool can be inserted through the AWC and used for tissue retraction during endoscopic resection. Results In the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with a modified grasp-and-snare technique and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were performed successfully using the AWC in eight patients. Complications were acute arterial bleeding post-EMR in two cases treated by endoscopic clipping. Conclusions We conclude that a newly developed external additional working channel (AWC) enables endoscopic resection of large lesions in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Potential benefits are its suitability for EMR and ESD, no need for a dual-channel endoscope and an adjustable distance of working channels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Walter
- Clinic for Internal Medicine I, Department of Gastroenterology, InExEn, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany,Corresponding author Dr. med. Benjamin M. Walter Uniklinik UlmKlinik für Innere Medizin IAlbert-Einstein-Allee 2389081 Ulm+0049 731/500 44502
| | - Simone Schmidbaur
- Clinic for Internal Medicine I, Department of Gastroenterology, InExEn, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Yannick Krieger
- Institute of Microtechnology and Medical Device Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Meining
- Clinic for Internal Medicine I, Department of Gastroenterology, InExEn, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dobashi A, Storm AC, Wong Kee Song LM, Gostout CJ, Deters JL, Miller CA, Knipschield MA, Rajan E. Efficacy and safety of an internal magnet traction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo study in a porcine model (with video). Surg Endosc 2018; 33:663-668. [PMID: 30353242 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6486-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate traction allows for safer and easier endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an internal magnet traction device (MTD) for ESD in an ex vivo porcine model. METHODS The MTD consisted of a small neodymium magnet and a suture attached to a through-the-scope clip. A circumferential mucosal incision was completed around a 30-mm diameter template that served as the target lesion. The first MTD was deployed at the proximal edge of the lesion. A second MTD was deployed on the wall opposite the lesion. With both magnets connected, this created traction or lifting of the target lesion towards the opposing wall during submucosal dissection. Primary endpoint was comparison of submucosal dissection times between conventional ESD (C-ESD) and MTD-assisted ESD (MTD-ESD). RESULTS Twenty lesions along the anterior wall, posterior wall and greater curvature were resected using either C-ESD or MTD-ESD. The submucosal dissection time in MTD-ESD was significantly shorter than C-ESD (median: 6.4 [interquartile range {IQR} 4.6-8.7] min vs. 14.4 min [IQR 11.8-18.0], p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between MTD-ESD and C-ESD in total procedure times for lesions on the posterior gastric wall and greater curvature (median: 23.0 min [IQR 21.1-24.5] vs. 29.2 min [IQR 24.8-33.2], p < 0.05) with no difference for lesions on the anterior gastric wall (median: 18.8 min [IQR 15.5-20.5] vs. 17.1 min [IQR 13.1-20.0], p = 0.5). The number of muscularis propria injuries per lesion was significantly lower in MTD-ESD than C-ESD (median: 0 [IQR 0-0] vs. 1 [IQR 0-2], p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS MTD for ESD is effective and safe when compared to C-ESD. This approach significantly reduced submucosal dissection times with less injury to the muscularis propria. Furthermore, MTD-ESD was particularly beneficial for more challenging gastric lesions located on the posterior wall and greater curvature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Dobashi
- Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Andrew C Storm
- Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Louis M Wong Kee Song
- Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Christopher J Gostout
- Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jodie L Deters
- Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Charles A Miller
- Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Mary A Knipschield
- Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Elizabeth Rajan
- Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Friedel D, Stavropoulos SN. Introduction of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10:225-238. [PMID: 30364783 PMCID: PMC6198314 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i10.225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Revised: 07/21/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is well established in Asia as a modality for selected advanced lesions of both the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, but ESD has not attained the same niche in the West due to a variety of reasons. These include competition from traditional surgery, minimally invasive surgery and endoscopic mucosal resection. Other obstacles to ESD introduction in the West include time commitment for learning and doing procedures, a steep learning curve, special equipment, lack of mentors, cost issues, interdisciplinary conflicts, concern regarding complications and lack of support from institutions and interfacing departments. There are intrinsic differences in pathology prevalence (e.g., early gastric cancer) between the two regions that are less conducive for ESD implementation in the West. We will elaborate on these issues and suggest measures as well as a protocol to overcome these obstacles and hopefully allow introduction of ESD as a tenable option for appropriate patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Friedel
- Gastroenterology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY 11501, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Longcroft-Wheaton G, Bhandari M, Alkandari A, Bhandari P. Recent advances in the management of large and complex colonic polyps. F1000Res 2018; 7:304. [PMID: 29568503 PMCID: PMC5850093 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.12930.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The endoscopic management of large colonic polyps is a rapidly changing field. Rapid evolution in endoscopic techniques and skills has resulted in diminishing the role of surgery in the management of larger and complex polyps. This is resulting in organ preservation for many who otherwise would have undergone surgery. However, it also poses new challenges. This article reviews these new advances and the developments which are overcoming these difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK.,Department of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Winston Churchill Avenue, Portsmouth P01 2UP, UK
| | - Megha Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK
| | - Asma Alkandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK.,Department of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Winston Churchill Avenue, Portsmouth P01 2UP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In Japan, colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is being conducted safely and effectively as shown by the increased number of the cases, however, it is still regarded as a complicated and challenging procedure. Therefore, piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (p-EMR) is still regarded as an appropriate treatment, rather than ESD for large colorectal tumors, especially in Western countries. Areas covered: There are several factors those are responsible for colorectal ESD difficulty. Firstly, there is no adequate traction or counter-traction in colorectal ESD. Secondly, it is challenging to handle the colonoscope in a redundant and narrow colonic lumen. Thirdly, the risk of perforation is estimated to be relatively higher compared to the stomach or esophagus Expert commentary: To overcome these difficulties, various traction and counter-traction methods have been reported and finally, the new concept of the Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER) has been developed and is soon to be available for clinical use. The authors have reviewed the history of colorectal ESD and MASTER in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaka Saito
- a Director of Endoscopy Center, Chief of Endoscopy Division , National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Kazuki Sumiyama
- b Department of Endoscopy , Jikei University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Philip Wai-Yan Chiu
- c Department of Surgery, Institute of Digestive Disease , The Chinese University of Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection: technique and new directions. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2017; 33:315-319. [PMID: 28704212 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Most of small tumours in gastrointestinal tract are easily removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, EMR are sometimes not reliable to ensure the complete resection for large tumours. Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed, it had a higher risk for complications such as perforation and bleeding. The techniques and clinical outcomes of EMR and ESD are reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS ESD is more effective for early gastric and oesophageal cancer with higher en-bloc resection rate and lower local recurrence in comparison to EMR. Several studies report favourable long-term outcomes of ESD. ESD has become a standard technique in Japan and other East Asian countries. Piecemeal resection using EMR technique is widely accepted for colorectal large adenomas and results in good clinical outcomes in most patients. However, apparent cancerous lesions need endoscopic en-bloc resection by ESD. SUMMARY Further development of the technique, devices and training systems will promote worldwide standardization of ESD.
Collapse
|
25
|
Longcroft-Wheaton G, Bhandari P. Management of early colonic neoplasia: where are we now and where are we heading? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 11:227-236. [PMID: 28052695 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1279051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
There have been considerable advances in the endoscopic treatment of colorectal neoplasia. The development of endoscopic submucosal dissection and full thickness resection techniques is changing the way benign disease and early cancers are managed. This article reviews the evidence behind these new techniques and discusses where this field is likely to move in the future. Areas covered: A PubMed literature review of resection techniques for colonic neoplasia was performed. The clinical and cost effectiveness of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is examined. The development of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and knife assisted resection is described and issues around training reviewed. Efficacy is compared to both EMR and transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The future is considered, including full thickness resection techniques and robotic endoscopy. Expert commentary: The perceived barriers to ESD are falling, and views that such techniques are only possible in Japan are disappearing. The key barriers to uptake will be training, and the development of educational programmes should be seen as a priority. The debate between TEMS and ESD will continue, but ESD is more flexible and cheaper. This will become less significant as the number of endoscopists trained in ESD grows and some TEMS surgeons may shift across towards ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton
- a Department of Endoscopy , Queen Alexandra Hospital , Portsmouth , UK.,b Department of Pharmacy and Biomedical sciences , University of Portsmouth , Portsmouth , United Kingdom
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- a Department of Endoscopy , Queen Alexandra Hospital , Portsmouth , UK.,b Department of Pharmacy and Biomedical sciences , University of Portsmouth , Portsmouth , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|