Congenital anomaly rectified at birth: one-stage single-incision laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for newborns with anorectal malformations and recto-urethral fistula

Classification and Surgical Management of Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Evidence-based Guideline From the APSA Outcomes and Evidence-based Practice Committee

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of neonates with anorectal malformations (ARMs) can be challenging due to variability in anatomic definitions, multiple approaches to surgical management, and heterogeneity of reported outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize existing evidence, identify treatment controversies, and provide guidelines for perioperative care.

METHODS

The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee (OEBP) drafted five consensus-based questions regarding management of children with ARMs. These questions were related to categorization of ARMs and optimal methods and timing of surgical management. A comprehensive search strategy was performed, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to perform the systematic review to attempt to answer five questions related to surgical care of ARM.

RESULTS

A total of 10,843 publications were reviewed, of which 90 were included in final recommendations, and some publications addressed more than one question (question: 1 n = 6, 2 n = 63, n = 15, 4 n = 44). Studies contained largely heterogenous groups of ARMs, making direct comparison for each subtype challenging and therefore, no specific recommendation for optimal surgical approach based on outcomes can be made. Both loop and divided colostomy may be acceptable methods of fecal diversion for patients with a diagnosis of anorectal malformation, however, loop colostomies have higher rates of prolapse in the literature reviewed. In terms of timing of repair, there did not appear to be significant differences in outcomes between early and late repair groups. Clear and uniform definitions are needed in order to ensure similar populations of patients are compared moving forward. Recommendations are provided based primarily on A-D levels of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based best practices for ARMs are lacking for many aspects of care. Multi-institutional registries have made progress to address some of these gaps. Further prospective and comparative studies are needed to improve care and provide consensus guidelines for this complex patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Transurachal Catheter for Management of Difficult Catheterization in Anorectal Malformations: A Novel Technique

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract drainage is necessary to facilitate the maneuver in laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP). Male patients with Anorectal malformations (ARM) are often encounter difficult catheterization during surgery.

OBJECTIVE

We pioneered the urinary catheterization through the urachus in ARM patients and evaluated the efficacy.

METHOD

Fourteen ARM patients undergoing urinary catheterization through urachus between September 2015 and September 2023 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The median age at the time of surgery was 0.06 months. Nine neonatal patients underwent the one-stage LAARP, while five patients underwent staged procedure. Four ARM patients with rectoprostatic fistula, while ten with rectobulbar fistula. All patients successfully underwent transurachal catheterization. No incidents of catheter blockage, accidental removal, or urinary tract infection symptoms were detected during hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Transurachal catheterization is a safe, effective, and cosmetic procedure for ARM patients with difficulty urethral catheterization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for anorectal malformation with rectobulbar fistula: A two-center comparative study with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty

Due to the controversy on the feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for the treatment of the anorectal malformation (ARM) with rectobulbar fistula (RBF), this study aimed to compare the outcomes of LAARP and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for ARM with RBF. Demographic data, postoperative complications, and bowel function of RBF patients who underwent LAARP and PSARP at 2 medical centers from 2016-2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-eight children with RBF were enrolled, including 43 in the LAARP group and 45 in the PSARP group. There were no significant differences in the sacral ratio (P = .222) or sacral agenesis (P = .374). Thirty-seven and 38 patients in the LAARP and PSARP groups were followed up for a median of 4.14 years. The postoperative complications were comparable between the groups (P = .624), with no cases of urethral diverticulum. The urination of all cases was normal and no evidence of cyst formation was found on MCU or MRI during the follow-up period. The incidence of rectal prolapse was similar between the 2 groups (9.3% vs 17.8%, P = .247). The groups had equivalent Bowel Function Score (15.29 ± 2.36 vs 15.58 ± 2.88, P = .645), but the LAARP group had better voluntary bowel movement (94.6% vs 84.2%, P = .148) by Krickenbeck classification. The intermediate-term outcomes of LAARP show that the urethral diverticulum was rare by the intraluminal incision of the fistular and the bowel function was comparable to that of PSARP in ARM with rectobulbar fistula. However, LAARP was associated with smaller perineal wounds.

Can Neonatal Pull-through Replace Staged Pull-through for the Management of Anorectal Malformation? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are managed classically in three stages - colostomy at birth, anorectal pull-through after 2-3 months, and stoma closure. Single-stage pull-through has been contemplated in neonatal age aimed to reduce the number of procedures, better long-term continence, the better psycho-social status of the child, and reduced cost of treatment, especially in resource-strained countries. We conducted a systematic review comparing neonatal single-stage pull-through with stage pull-through and did a meta-analysis for the outcome and complications. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched and RevMan 5.4.1 was used for the meta-analysis. Fourteen comparative studies including one randomized controlled trial were included in the systematic review for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 1845 patients including 866 neonates undergoing single-stage pull-through. There was no statistically significant difference for the occurrence of surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-2.83), urinary tract injury (OR 1.82, 95% CI: 0.85-3.89), rectal prolapse (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.21-5.04), anal stenosis/stricture, voluntary bowel movements (OR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.25-3.73), constipation (OR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.61-1.67), soiling (OR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52-1.51), mortality (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 0.04-39.74), or other complications. However, continence was seen to be better among patients undergoing neonatal pull-through (OR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.12-2.38). Thus, we can recommend single-stage pull-through for managing patients with ARMs in the neonatal age.

Efficacy of Laparoscopic Management of Posterior Urethral Diverticulum in Anorectal Malformations

BACKGROUND

A posterior urethral diverticulum (PUD) is a serious postoperative complication after anorectal malformation correction. Complete resection is technical demanding because of limited retrourethral working space deep in the pelvis.

OBJECTIVE

We pioneered the single-incision laparoscopic approach for PUD excision and evaluated the efficacy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-six PUD patients undergoing redo surgeries between June 2011 and June 2021 were reviewed.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

A series of transabdominal retraction sutures were placed through the PUD to facilitate dissection. The contents were evacuated to create a working space. Distal PUD dissection was carried along the submucosal layer to prevent injury of the urethra/pelvic nerve complex. The rectal mucosa was peeled off from the junction site for complete PUD excision. The muscular cuff of the distal rectum was then oversewn.

MEASUREMENTS

Operative time, postoperative recovery, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The mean age of redo surgery was 2.46 yr. The average operative duration was 2.35 h. The mean postoperative hospital stay, resumption of full diet, and bowel movement were 10.23, 2.15, and 1.54 d, respectively. The median follow-up period was 46 mo (12-132 mo). No remnant of PUD, recurrent fistula, or urinary leak was detected. None of the patients had difficulty in urination, urinary dribbling, urinary tract infection, constipation, or soiling. All patients retained morning erection, and two postpubertal patients had ejaculations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-incision laparoscopic redo surgery provides an effective approach for PUD excision. It minimizes complications. It also preserves urinary and bowel continence and sexual function.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Complete resection of a posterior urethral diverticulum (PUD) in anorectal malformation is technically demanding because of limited retrourethral working space in the deep pelvis. The outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic PUD excision were satisfactory.

One-stage versus staged laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for high-and intermediate anorectal malformations: Medium-term outcomes from a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The timing of anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations (ARMs) is controversial and essential for long-term bowel function. The advantages of laparoscopy make primary anoplasty possible for neonates. This study aims to report the medium-term results of the one-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) and compare them with the staged LAARP.

METHODS

This study included 242 boys who underwent LAARP between June 2013 and December 2018 in our center. Forty-five neonatal patients successfully underwent the one-stage LAARP, and the remaining 197 patients who had already undergone colostomy received staged procedures. The complications and bowel function were compared between the two groups after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Before matching, age at assessment and classification were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). After PSM, 42 patients were included in each of the two groups, and the patients were well balanced. The overall occurrence of postoperative complications in the one-stage group was significantly lower than in the staged group (P < 0.05). The median follow-up periods were 55.0 and 54.5 months, respectively. The mean value of BFS was similar in the two groups. After medical management, a second evaluation was conducted to distinguish overflow pseudo-incontinence from patients with no bowel control potential. The functional outcome in the two groups is comparable (P = 0.307).

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage LAARP is safe and feasible for neonates with high-and intermediate-type ARMs. Compared with staged LAARP, one-stage LAARP has fewer complications and comparable functional outcomes. The authors recommend these procedures to be performed in dedicated centers with sufficient expertise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Single-stage procedures for anorectal malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to describe all published studies of single-stage procedures for anorectal malformations and to perform a meta-analysis of studies that compared single-stage to staged procedures.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in Pubmed, Medline, Embase and CENTRAL. Meta-analysis was performed in RevMan and expressed as forest plots with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies were included in the narrative synthesis. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, representing 537 patients. The majority (70%) of patients included in this meta-analysis had either perineal or vestibular fistulas. Surgical site infection (SSI) was defined as any reported infection involving the neoanus (both superficial infection and dehiscence) and occurred in 51 of the 291 patients who underwent single-stage procedures, and 26 of the 244 patients who underwent staged procedure. Meta-analysis showed a 2.2 times higher risk of surgical site infection (SSI) amongst patients who undergo single-stage procedures (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.26, 3.92). Six of the 293 patients (2%) who underwent single-stage procedures required a rescue ostomy for wound dehiscence. In LMIC the risk of wound dehiscence was three-fold higher in single-stage (36/202) compared to staged procedures (12/126) (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.42, 6.63). In HIC there was no evidence of an increased risk of wound dehiscence in patients who underwent a single-stage (15/91) compared to a staged procedure (14/118) (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.65, 3.51). There is no evidence of a difference between single-stage versus staged procedures with regards to functional outcomes including voluntary bowel movements (79/90 versus 111/128), soiling (24/165 versus 20/203) or constipation (27/90 versus 36/128).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides further evidence that single-stage procedures for selected patients with anorectal malformations are safe. Whilst there is evidence of an increased risk of SSI, this did not translate to a significant difference in long-term functional outcomes.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Determination of the normal conus medullaris level in term infants: the role of MRI in early infancy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the migration process of the conus medullaris (CM) in early infancy using infant MRI and to evaluate the application of MRI for locating the infant CM level.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed the CM level on the lumbosacral MR images of 26 term infants aged < 3 months who were classified into three groups according to age. The authors numbered the CM level in each patient and analyzed the range and average of the CM level of the cohort. The authors studied the linear correlation between CM level and postnatal days with linear regression analysis, 1-way ANOVA, and the least significant difference test.

RESULTS

The CM level ranged from the superior border of the L1 vertebra to the top third of the L3 vertebra. About 96.2% of infants had CM higher than the superior border of the L3 vertebra. On average, CM was located between the L1-2 intervertebral disc and the inferior border of the L2 vertebra (mean ± SD score 1.64 ± 1.14). The three groups had no significant statistical difference in CM level (F = 1.071 and p = 0.359; groups 1 and 2, p = 0.408; groups 1 and 3, p = 0.170; groups 2 and 3, p = 0.755). CM level had no linear regression correlation with postnatal days within the first month (r2 = 0.061, F = 0.654, p = 0.438) or within the first 3 months (r2 = 0.002, F = 0.056, p = 0.816).

CONCLUSIONS

The CM level reaches the normal adult level by birth in term infants and does not ascend during childhood. On average, the CM was between the L1-2 intervertebral disc and the inferior border of the L2 vertebra in term infants. Considering the possibility of physiologically low-lying CM, the authors agree that normal CM is located above the L3 level in term infants and CM at the L3 level could be equivocal and should be investigated with other clinical data. The study data suggest that MRI is an accurate and valuable method for determining the CM level in term infants.

The incidence of different forms of ileus following surgery for abdominal birth defects in infants: a systematic review with a meta-analysis method

Objectives

Ileus following surgery can arise in different forms namely as paralytic ileus, adhesive small bowel obstruction or as anastomotic stenosis. The incidences of these different forms of ileus are not well known after abdominal birth defect surgery in infants. Therefore, this review aims to estimate the incidence in general between abdominal birth defects.

Content

Studies reporting on paralytic ileus, adhesive small bowel obstruction or anastomotic stenosis were considered eligible. PubMed and Embase were searched and risk of bias was assessed. Primary outcome was the incidence of complications. A meta-analysis was performed to pool the reported incidences in total and per birth defect separately.

Summary

This study represents a total of 11,617 patients described in 152 studies of which 86 (56%) had a follow-up of at least half a year. Pooled proportions were calculated as follows; paralytic ileus: 0.07 (95%-CI, 0.05-0.11; I 2=71%, p≤0.01) ranging from 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08-0.23) in gastroschisis to 0.05 (95%-CI: 0.02-0.13) in omphalocele. Adhesive small bowel obstruction: 0.06 (95%-CI: 0.05-0.07; I 2=74%, p≤0.01) ranging from 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06-0.19) in malrotation to 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02-0.06) in anorectal malformations. Anastomotic stenosis after a month 0.04 (95%-CI: 0.03-0.06; I 2=59%, p=0.30) ranging from 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04-0.14) in gastroschisis to 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01-0.04) in duodenal obstruction. Anastomotic stenosis within a month 0.03 (95%-CI 0.01-0.10; I 2=81%, p=0.02) was reviewed without separate analysis per birth defect.

Outlook

This review is the first to aggregate the known literature in order approximate the incidence of different forms of ileus for different abdominal birth defects. We showed these complications are common and the distribution varies between birth defects. Knowing which birth defects are most at risk can aid clinicians in taking prompt action, such as nasogastric tube placement, when an ileus is suspected. Future research should focus on the identification of risk factors and preventative measures. The incidences provided by this review can be used in those studies as a starting point for sample size calculations.

Laparoscopic Approach in Anorectal Malformations: How We Do It

Laparoscopy has a major role in the treatment of anorectal malformations (ARM) since Georgeson et al. introduced the laparoscopic assisted anorectoplasty in 2000. The majority of ARM can be repaired through a posterior sagittal incision without the need to enter the abdomen. Some ARM types require an abdominal approach to detach the rectum from the urinary tract in males or the vagina in females. Those malformations benefit from laparoscopy. In this article, we aimed to highlight the technical aspects relevant to the current laparoscopic repair of ARM.

Refinements in surgical techniques for visualized tunnel formation in laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) is becoming a more popular procedure for anorectal malformation (ARM) repair. However, the conventional technique for creating pull-through tunnel between the perineal skin and the pelvic floor has been criticized as being semi-blind. This study aims to present a refined version of our previously reported clamp introduction technique for visualized tunnel formation in the center of the sphincter muscle complex (SMC) for rectal pull- through for ARMs.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for ARM patients who underwent LAARP from Jan 2019 to Jun 2020. Longitudinal muscle tube (LMT) tunnel was created using the clamp-dilator introduction technique: a laparoscopic dilator was used to create a pelvic tunnel within LMT in high ARM, and the clamp introduction under the direct vision technique was performed for creating the perineal tunnel of LMT for both high and intermediate ARMs.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (1-198 days) with high-type (27cases) and intermediate-type (43 cases) ARM underwent LAARP using clamp-dilation introduction technique. No patients suffered from urinary tract injury, recurrent rectourethral fistula, urethral diverticulum and urinary incontinence. One patient suffered from wound infection and rectal retraction which required a redo pull-through on postoperative day 7. Rectal prolapse requiring surgical intervention developed in one patient. Postoperative MRI examination confirmed central placement of the rectum within the LMT in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Our experience demonstrates that a visualized tunnel formation in the LMT center can be achieved by the clamp-dilator introduction technique in LAARP for both high and intermediate ARMs.

Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty-Surgical procedures and outcomes: A literature review

Anorectal malformation includes various types of anomalies. The goal of definitive surgery is achievement of fecal continence. Twenty years have passed since laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) was reported by Georgeson. Since LAARP is gaining popularity, its long-term outcomes should be evaluated. Presently, there is no evidence regarding the optimal method of ligating and dividing the fistula correctly and creating the pull-through canal accurately. Rectal prolapse and remnant of the original fistula (ROOF) tend to develop more often in LAARP patients than in posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) patients; however, robust evidence is not available. Prolapse may be prevented by suture fixation of the rectum to the presacral fascia; however, if prolapse occurs, the indication, timing, and the best method for surgical correction remain unclear. Most patients with ROOF are asymptomatic, and there is controversy regarding the indications for ROOF resection. This article aimed to detail the various modifications of the LAARP procedures reported previously and to describe the surgical outcomes, particularly focusing on rectal prolapse, ROOF, and fecal continence, by reviewing the literature. Functional outcomes after LAARP were almost similar to those noted after PSARP, and we have demonstrated that LAARP is not inferior to PSARP with respect to fecal continence. Although there is controversy regarding the application of LAARP for recto-bulbar cases, we believe that LAARP is still evolving, and we can achieve better outcomes by improving the procedure.

A novel combined enteroscopy and laparoscopy approach to prevent urethral complications in management of rectourethral fistula

BACKGROUND

For the last 20 years, laparoscopy management of anorectal malformations (ARM) has been challenged due to the development of postoperative urethral diverticulum or injury caused by the imprecise transection of rectourethral fistulae, particularly rectobulbar fistulae situated deep in the pelvis. We have developed a combined approach of enteroscopy and laparoscopy for intraluminal incision of a rectourethral fistula.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 47 ARM patients who underwent surgical corrections using the combined approach between January 2019 and June 2020. Early postoperative and subsequent follow-up results were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 12 months. The average age at surgery was 3.18 ± 0.64 months. The mean operative time of a single-incision laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (SILAARP) was 1.19 ± 0.29 h. The time for intraluminal incision of the fistula was shortened from 14 to 2 min. No patients underwent a conversion. The average postoperative hospital stay, time to full feeds and placement of an anal tube were 10 days, 1 day, and 5 days, respectively. No urethral diverticulum, urinary injury, wound infection, rectal retraction, anal stenosis or rectal prolapse was encountered in the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined enteroscopy and laparoscopy approach offers precise management of rectourethral fistulae. It could effectively obviate urethral complications, eliminating the obstacles of laparoscopy application in the management of ARMs.

Incisional hernia after surgical correction of abdominal congenital anomalies in infants: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Incisional hernia (IH) in children could result in life-threatening complications, including incarceration and bowel strangulation. The incidence and risk factors of IH in infants are scarcely reported. Since IH-correction may require extensive surgery and a long recovery program, identifying infants and birth defects at risk, may lead to a different approach during the primary surgery. Therefore, the aim of this review is to systematically review the available data on the incidence of IH following surgery for congenital anomalies in infants. All studies describing IH were considered eligible. PubMed and Embase were searched and risk of bias was assessed. Primary outcome was the incidence of IH, secondary outcomes were difference in IH occurrence between disease severity (complex vs simple) and closure method (SILO vs primary closure) in gastroschisis patients. A meta-analysis was performed to pool the reported incidences in total and per congenital anomaly separately. Subgroup analysis within gastroschisis articles was performed. The 50 included studies represent 3140 patients. The pooled proportion of IH was 0.03 (95% CI 0.02–0.05; I² = 79%, p ≤ 0.01) all anomalies combined. Gastroschisis (GS) reported highest pooled proportion 0.10 (95% CI 0.06–0.17; n = 142/1273; I² = 86%; p ≤ 0.01). SILO closure (OR 3.09) and simple gastroschisis, i.e. without additional anomalies, (OR 0.18) were of significant influence. This review reports the incidence of IH in infants with different congenital abdominal anomalies, of which gastroschisis reported the highest risk. In GS patients, complex GS and SILO closure are risk factors for IH development.

Lasting impact on children with an anorectal malformations with proper surgical preparation, respect for anatomic principles, and precise surgical management

Optimal outcomes in the management of children with Anorectal Malformation (ARM) require careful surgical preparation and detailed understanding of the anatomic principles and operative setup. A clear understanding of operative anatomy and surgical principals guides decision making. Adherence to the principles of ARM repair, as well as the application of operative and imaging adjuncts, will yield the safest and most successful approach to ARM. In this review, we detail the surgical preparation, anatomic principles, and surgical management issues unique to ARM.

Postoperative "complications" following laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty: A systematic review

AIM

This study reviewed the literature on the postoperative complications following laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP).

METHODS

A Medline and Embase search was performed for the terms "anorectal malformation" (ARM) "laparoscopic" and "complication". Articles without English full text, review articles, systematic reviews, case reports, case series < 5 cases and duplicate articles were excluded. Two reviewers independently performed the eligibility assessment and data extraction. Data were collected for type of malformation, surgical technique, postoperative complications and functional outcomes RESULTS: The search retrieved 108 articles, of which 38 met the inclusion criteria and offered 1058 patients for analysis. Rectoprostatic and rectobladder neck fistula were the most common types of ARM in males, whereas it was the common cloaca in females. Analysis of complications demonstrated rectal prolapse (n = 149; 14.08%) being the most prominent, followed by urethral diverticulum (n = 32; 3.02%), anal stenosis (n = 37; 3.49%), recurrent fistula (n = 7; 0.66%) and rectal stricture (n = 4; 0.37%). Krickenbeck classification was used for functional assessment in 638 patients, with fecal soiling grade 2 or > 2 in 79. Data on functional outcome specific to the type of malformation was available for 246 patients: fecal soiling grade 2 or > 2 in 15/94 (15.95%) with rectoprostatic fistula, 26/73 (35.61%) with rectobladder neck fistula, 6/47 (12.76%) with common cloaca, and 1/22 (4.54%) with no fistula.

CONCLUSION

Rectal prolapse, posterior urethral diverticulum and anal stenosis are the most common complications after LAARP. Inconsistent and non-uniform functional assessment and non-availability of information about the sacrum and spine make it difficult to analyze the functional outcome following LAARP.

Rectal Prolapse After Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectoplasty for Anorectal Malformations

Aim: To clarify the characteristics of patients with rectal prolapse after laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP), estimate the causes, and evaluate its impact on postoperative bowel function. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent LAARP for high- or intermediate-type anorectal malformation between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data were compared between patients with (Group P) and without prolapse (normal, Group N). Fecal continence was evaluated using the clinical assessment score for fecal continence developed by the Japanese Study Group of Anorectal Anomalies. For patients who underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before LAARP, atrophy, or asymmetry of the anal sphincter and levator ani was evaluated by a radiologist. Results: Of the 49 patients, 29 (59%) had rectal prolapse after LAARP (Group P) and 20 did not (Group N). We found no significant difference in gender, type of malformations, incidence of associated spinal or lumbosacral anomalies, procedure time, and postoperative bowel function at ages 4, 8, 12, and 16 years. However, LAARP was performed significantly earlier in Group N (median [range], 180 [123-498] days) than in Group P (210 [141-570] days). In Group P, 18 patients (62%) developed prolapse before colostomy takedown. Eight of 26 patients who underwent surgical prolapse repair required redo procedures. Twenty-five patients who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI showed no significant relationship between the muscular abnormalities and the incidence of postoperative rectal prolapse. Conclusions: Although recurrence is common, performing LAARP at a younger age might prevent postoperative prolapse development.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through for Currarino Syndrome

Objective: Currarino syndrome (CS) is characterized by the triad of sacral anomalies, presacral tumor, and anorectal malformation (ARM). This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) for CS. Materials and Methods: Children admitted for primary or redo repair of CS through LAARP between 2016 and 2019 were reviewed. The indication of redo included constipation with megarectosigmoid, residual presacral mass, anastomosis leak, and secondary fistula. ARM was corrected by excision of rectal stenosis, fistula, and its associated megarectosigmoid. This was followed by a complete surgical resection of the presacral tumor, with subsequent pull-through and anocolic anastomosis. This was done with a combined laparoscopic and transanal approach. The detailed surgical techniques, early postoperative complications, and mid-term functional outcomes were summarized. Results: Fourteen patients underwent LAARP for primary (N = 4) and redo (N = 10) repair of CS. Four of them had colostomy previously. Mean age at operation was 20.7 ± 13.9 months. Mean operative time was 120 ± 25 minutes. Median hospital stay was 8 days (range 7-9 days) postoperatively. None of the patients developed early postoperative complications such as anastomotic leaks, presacral abscesses, recurrent fistulas, and residual mass. Bowel function was assessed 1 year after LAARP in 10 patients. Mean follow-up time was 15.9 months. The frequency of bowel movements was 3.3 ± 1.5/day. Constipation occurred in 2 patients. Occasional soiling (<3 times/week) was reported in 4 patients and frequent soiling (>3 times/week) was in 1. Conclusion: LAARP for CS is safe and effective.

Laparoscopic surgical technique to enhance the management of anorectal malformations: 330 cases' experience in a single center

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) is considered to benefit the patients with vesico-prostatic fistula. The aim of this study is to present the details of our LAARP technique for improving the short- and long-term outcomes in the patients with high and intermediate types of anorectal malformations (ARMs).

METHODS

330 patients with high-type (174 cases) and intermediate-type (156 cases) anorectal malformation (aged 8 days to 15 years) underwent LAARP from 2001 to 2019. LAARP was performed for full mobilization and resection of the dilated rectum, intra-rectal closure of the fistula, visualization, and enlargement of the center of the longitudinal muscle tube (LMT) from pelvic and perineal aspects.

RESULTS

LAARP was performed in all patients and no patient was converted to open procedure. The urethral diverticulum was found in three patients (1.02%, 3/294) according to postoperative protocol voiding cystourethrogram but was not associated with any symptoms such as urinary tract infection and dysuria. Rectal prolapse requiring surgical intervention developed in 25 (7.6%) of 330 patients. Anal stricture occurred in three patients and re-do anoplasty was performed 5 months after LAARP. Anal retraction occurred in two patients and re-pull-through was conducted at 5 and 6 days, respectively, after LAARP. 228 patients who were older than 3 years were followed up. The median follow-up period was 5.8 years (range 3-15 years). 217 patients (95.2%) had voluntary bowel movements; 202 patients (88.6%) were free from soiling or with grade 1 soiling; 30 patients (13.6%) and 25 patients (11.3%) suffered from grade 1 and grade 2 constipation, respectively, while no patient had grade 3 constipation.

CONCLUSION

Our experience demonstrates that the LAARP has advantages on rectal mobilization and resection, intra-rectal fistula closure and accurate tunnel formation in the LMT with minimal trauma. The improvement of the short-term and long-term outcomes after LAARP has been shown not only for high-type ARM but also for intermediate-type ARM.

Two-Staged Versus Three-Staged Laparoscopic Anorectoplasty for Patients with Rectoprostatic and Bladder Neck Fistulas: A Comparative Study

Purpose: To compare the results of two- versus three-staged laparoscopic anorectoplasty (LARP) in children with rectoprostatic and bladder neck fistulas. Materials and Methods: The present study was retrospectively initiated among 32 consecutive patients who underwent two-staged LARP from October 2010 to December 2012. The associated defects, age at the operation, operative time, complications, length of the postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, and functional results (according to the Krickenbeck scoring system) were evaluated. The results were compared with those of 19 cases who underwent three-staged LARP from October 2008 to September 2010. Results: The average age at the second operation was 4.5 ± 1.2 months in the two-staged group, and 4.2 ± 1.3 months in the three-staged group. In the two-staged group, there were statistically shorter overall operative time and postoperative hospital stay duration. Also, a significantly lower total hospitalization cost was achieved. There was no anastomotic leak in either group. The rates of perineal wound infection, recurrent fistula, and rectal prolapse were 3.85% versus 0% (P = 1.000), 0% versus 5.3% (P = .422), and 11.5% versus 15.8% (P = .686), respectively (two-staged versus three-staged group). The median follow-up time was 67 (range, 54-80) months and 88 (range, 81-104) months, respectively. No significant difference in functional outcome was observed. Conclusions: Two-staged LARP is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective, with comparable incidences of complications and functional outcomes with respect to a three-staged procedure.

Development of pediatric minimally invasive surgery in mainland China

Pediatric laparoscopic surgery has developed rapidly in the past 20 years in mainland China with the help of international collaborative training programs. High-volume laparoscopic workload has enabled Chinese pediatric surgeons to innovate and gain experience within a short span of time. We feel that outcomes are comparable or even in some cases superior to that of open surgery. In this article, based on the Storz Lecture to the 65th BAPS Congress in Liverpool, we share our experience of this rapid development of pediatric laparoscopy. EVIDENCE LEVEL: V.

The midterm outcomes of 1-stage versus 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in anorectal malformations with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula: A retrospective cohort study

The aim of this study was to compare the midterm outcomes of 1-stage and 3-stage surgical procedures to treat anorectal malformations (ARMs) with rectoprostatic and rectobulbar fistula using laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP).A total of 56 patients with ARMs and rectoprostatic and rectobulbar fistula who underwent LAARP from January 2011 to May 2014 in our institution were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups according to the stage of procedure. The patients' data and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. The Krickenbeck classification was used for assessing the bowel functions.About 20 ARM newborns (rectoprostatic fistula [12], rectobulbar fistula [8]) successfully underwent a 1-stage LAARP, and about 36 ARM children (rectoprostatic fistula [20], rectobulbar fistula [16]) underwent a 3-stage LAARP (colostomy, LAARP, and closure of colostomy). The average age at the LAARP procedure in 1-stage group was significantly lower than that in 3-stage group (39.8 ± 8.1 hours vs 4.9 ± 1.2 months; P = .00). The average operative time during the definitive procedure was 132.2 ± 15.9 minutes in the 1-stage group and 120.5 ± 12.7 minutes in the 3-stage group (P = .13). There was only 5 to 10 mL of blood loss during the LAARP procedure both the groups (P = .75). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative hospital stay during the definitive procedure (10.2 ± 2.3 days vs 8.5 ± 2.2 days; P = .22). The rate of surgical site infection and dehiscence was 5% (1/20) in the 1-stage group and 5.6% (2/36) in 3-stage group (P = 1.00). During the period of follow-up, the rate of voluntary bowel movement was 90% (18/20) in 1-stage group and 94.4% (34/36) in 3-stage group (P = .94). Free from soiling or grade I soiling was 80% (16/20) in 1-stage group and 83.3% (30/36) in 3-stage group (P = 1.00); grade II soiling was found in 3 (10%) patients in 1-stage group and 85.7% in 3-stage group (P = .75); grade III soiling was found in 3 (10%) patients in 1-stage group and 85.7% in 3-stage group (P = 1.00). Three patients (15%) in 1-stage group and 5 patients (13.9%) in 3-stage group suffered from grade I constipation (P = 1.00); while 3 (15%) patients in 1-stage group and 4 patients (11.1%) in 3-stage group had grade II constipation (P = 1.00); no patients in the 2 groups suffered from grade III constipation.The 1-stage LAARP procedure for neonate with rectoprostatic and rectobulbar fistula can achieve comparable midterm outcomes as the conventional 3-stage LAARP procedure. It provides an alternative method to rectify the ARMs with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula without colostomy.

Management of acquired rectourethral fistulas in adults

Rectourethral fistula is an uncommon but devastating condition resulting from surgery, radiation, trauma, inflammation, or occasionally anorectal anomaly. Because of involving the urinary and the digestive system, surgical repair can be challenging. More than 40 different surgical approaches were described in the literature. However, no standardized management exists due to the rarity and complexity of the problem. Spontaneous closure of fistula is rare and most cases need reconstructive procedures. Appropriate preoperative assessment is crucial for the decision of operation time and method. Gradually accumulating evidence indicates surgeons should take fistula size, tissue health and vascularity associated with radiation or infection, urethral stricture, and bladder neck sclerosis into consideration and make a proper treatment plan according to the features of various approaches. Accurate preoperative evaluation and proper approach selection would increase success rates. Multiple surgical team corporation, including colorectal, urological and plastic surgeons, would optimize the outcomes.

Single-incision laparoscopy surgery: a systematic review

Background

Laparoscopic surgery is a modern surgical technique in which operations are performed far from their location through small incisions elsewhere in the body.

Objective

This systematic review is aimed to overview single-incision laparoscopy surgery.

Methods

This systematic review was carried out by searching studies in PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and IranMedex databases. The initial search strategy identified about 87 references. In this study, 54 studies were accepted for further screening and met all our inclusion criteria [in English, full text, therapeutic effects of single-incision laparoscopy surgery and dated mainly from the year 1990 to 2016]. The search terms were “single-incision,” “surgery,” and “laparoscopy.”

Results

Single-incision laparoscopy surgery is widely used for surgical operations in cholecystectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, cholecystoduodenostomy, hepatobiliary disease, colon cancer, obesity, appendectomy, liver surgery, rectosigmoid cancer, vaginal hysterectomy, vaginoplasty, colorectal lung metastases, pyloroplasty, endoscopic surgery, hernia repair, nephrectomy, rectal cancer, colectomy and uterus-preserving repair, bile duct exploration, ileo-ileal resection, lymphadenectomy, incarcerated inguinal hernia, anastomosis, congenital anomaly, colectomy for cancer.

Conclusion

Based on the findings, single-incision laparoscopy surgery is a scarless surgery with minimal access. Although it possesses lots of benefits, including less incisional pain and scars, cosmesis, and the ability to convert to standard multiport laparoscopic surgery, it has some disadvantages, for example, less freedom of movement, fewer number of ports that can be used, and the proximity of the instruments to each other during the operation.