1
|
Tian Q, Wang H, Guo T, Yao B, Liu Y, Zhu B. The efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Program in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Med 2024; 56:2306194. [PMID: 38279689 PMCID: PMC10823895 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2306194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although ERAS Program had some advantages in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), its efficacy and safety remained unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the ERAS group and the traditional care (TC) group in LDG. METHODS Multiple databases were retrieved from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2023. The risk ratio (RR), standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the results. RESULTS Our meta-analysis contained 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies, which comprised 1468 patients. Regarding efficacy, the ERAS group had significantly shorter postoperative time to first flatus (SMD = -1.29 [95% CI: -1.68, -0.90]), shorter time to first defecation (SMD = -1.26 [95% CI: -1.90, -0.61]), shorter hospital stays (SMD = -0.99 [95% CI: -1.34, -0.63]), and lower hospitalization costs (SMD = -1.17 [95% CI: -1.86, -0.48]) compared to the TC group. Furthermore, in the ERAS group, C-reactive protein levels were lower on postoperative days 1, 3 or 4, and 7; albumin levels were higher on postoperative days 3 or 4 and 7; and interleukin-6 levels were lower on postoperative days 1 and 3. Regarding safety, the overall postoperative complication rate was lower in the ERAS group (RR: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.97]), but there was no significant difference in the individual postoperative complication rate. Other indicators were also not statistically significant. CONCLUSION The combination of ERAS Program with laparoscopy surgery was safe and effective for the perioperative management of patients with distal gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qihui Tian
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University/Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Hongying Wang
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University/Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Tianyu Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University/Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Bing Yao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University/Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Yefu Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University/Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Bo Zhu
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University/Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pesce A, Portinari M, Fabbri N, Sciascia V, Uccellatori L, Vozza M, Righini E, Feo CV. Impact of enhanced recovery program on clinical outcomes after elective colorectal surgery in a rural hospital. A single center experience. Heliyon 2024; 10:e33989. [PMID: 39071659 PMCID: PMC11282988 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The main purpose was to determine the impact on postoperative outcomes of a standardized enhanced recovery program (ERP) for elective colorectal surgery in a rural hospital. Methods A prospective series of patients (N = 80) undergoing elective colorectal resection completing a standardized ERP protocol in 2018-2020 (ERP group) was compared to patients (N = 80) operated at the same rural hospital in 2013-2015 (pre-ERP group), before the implementation of the program. The exclusion criteria for both groups were: ASA score IV, TNM stage IV, inflammatory bowel disease, emergency surgery, and rectal cancer. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LoS) which was used as an estimate of functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission and mortality rates as well as associated factors with both postoperative complications and prolonged hospital LoS. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. The median adherence to ERP protocol elements was 68 % versus 12 % in the retrospective control group. The median hospital LoS in the ERP-group was significantly lower than in the pre-ERP group (5 vs. 10 days) with no increase in 30-day readmission and mortality rates. The Body Mass Index ≥30 and the traditional peri-operative protocol were the associated factors to postoperative complications, while following a traditional peri-operative protocol was the only factor associated with a prolonged hospital LoS (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Although limited hospital resources are perceived as a barrier to ERP implementation, the current experience demonstrates how adopting an ERP program in a rural area is feasible and effective, despite it requires greater effort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Pesce
- Unit of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Mattia Portinari
- Unit of Surgery 2, Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Nicolò Fabbri
- Unit of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Valeria Sciascia
- Unit of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Lisa Uccellatori
- Unit of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Michela Vozza
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Emergency, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Erminio Righini
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Emergency, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Carlo V. Feo
- Unit of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
El-Kefraoui C, Do U, Miller A, Kouyoumdjian A, Cui D, Khorasani E, Landry T, Amar-Zifkin A, Lee L, Feldman LS, Fiore JF. Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on patient-reported outcomes after abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8043-8056. [PMID: 37474828 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10289-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence supports that enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) reduce length of stay and complications; however, these measures may not reflect the perspective of patients who are the main stakeholders in the recovery process. This systematic review aimed to appraise the evidence regarding the impact of ERPs on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after abdominal surgery. METHODS Five databases (Medline, Embase, Biosis, Cochrane, and Web of Science) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the impact of ERPs on PROs after abdominal surgery. We focused on distinct periods of recovery: early (within 7 days postoperatively) and late (beyond 7 days). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2.0. Results were appraised descriptively as heterogeneity hindered meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. RESULTS Fifty-six RCTs were identified [colorectal (n = 18), hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) (n = 11), upper gastrointestinal (UGI) (n = 10), gynecological (n = 7), urological (n = 7), general surgery (n = 3)]. Most trials had 'some concerns' (n = 30) or 'high' (n = 25) risk of bias. In the early postoperative period, ERPs improved patient-reported general health (colorectal, HPB, UGI, urological; very low to low certainty), physical health (colorectal, gynecological; very low to low certainty), mental health (colorectal, gynecological; very low certainty), pain (all specialties; very low to moderate certainty), and fatigue (colorectal; low certainty). In the late postoperative period, ERPs improved general health (HPB, UGI, urological; very low certainty), physical health (UGI, gynecological, urological; very low to low certainty), mental health (UGI, gynecological, urological; very low certainty), social health (gynecological; very low certainty), pain (gynecological, urological; very low certainty), and fatigue (gynecological; very low certainty). CONCLUSION This review supports that ERPs may have a positive impact on patient-reported postoperative health status (i.e., general, physical, mental, and social health) and symptom experience (i.e., pain and fatigue) after abdominal surgery; however, data were largely derived from low-quality trials. Although these findings contribute important knowledge to inform evidence-based ERP implementation, there remains a great need to improve PRO assessment in studies focused on postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbel El-Kefraoui
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Uyen Do
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Andrew Miller
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Araz Kouyoumdjian
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David Cui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Elahe Khorasani
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tara Landry
- Bibliothèque de la Santé, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Medical Libraries, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence Lee
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julio F Fiore
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, R2-104, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy After Colorectal Enhanced Recovery Pathway. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2023; 4:e267. [PMCID: PMC10431437 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the influence of enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) after colorectal surgery. Background: ERP improves early outcomes after colorectal surgery; however, little is known about its influence on PROMs and on RIOT. Methods: Prospective multicenter enrollment of patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis was performed, recording variables related to patient-, institution-, procedure-level data, adherence to the ERP, and outcomes. The primary endpoints were PROMs (administered before surgery, at discharge, and 6 to 8 weeks after surgery) and RIOT after surgery for malignancy, defined as the intended oncologic treatment according to national guidelines and disease stage, administered within 8 weeks from the index operation, evaluated through multivariate regression models. Results: The study included 4529 patients, analyzed for PROMs, 1467 of which were analyzed for RIOT. Compared to their baseline preoperative values, all PROMs showed significant worsening at discharge and improvement at late evaluation. PROMs values at discharge and 6 to 8 weeks after surgery, adjusted through a generalized mixed regression model according to preoperative status and other variables, showed no association with ERP adherence rates. RIOT rates (overall 54.5%) were independently lower by aged > 69 years, ASA Class III, open surgery, and presence of major morbidity; conversely, they were independently higher after surgery performed in an institutional ERP center and by ERP adherence rates > median (69.2%). Conclusions: Adherence to the ERP had no effect on PROMs, whereas it independently influenced RIOT rates after surgery for colorectal cancer. In this prospective multicenter study performed on 4529 patients who underwent colorectal resection, adherence to an enhanced recovery pathway showed no effect on patient-reported outcomes but independently influenced the return to intended oncologic therapy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:5-30. [PMID: 36515747 PMCID: PMC9839829 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09758-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) are dedicated to ensuring high-quality innovative patient care for surgical patients by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus as well as minimally invasive surgery. The ASCRS and SAGES society members involved in the creation of these guidelines were chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery and enhanced recovery. This consensus document was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus and develop clinical practice guidelines based on the best available evidence. While not proscriptive, these guidelines provide information on which decisions can be made and do not dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, healthcare workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. These guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient. This clinical practice guideline represents a collaborative effort between the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and was approved by both societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Irani
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Traci L Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Timothy E Miller
- Duke University Medical Center Library, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Benjamin D Shogan
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joel E Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Surgery (Colon and Rectal), 222 Piedmont #7000, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:15-40. [PMID: 36515513 PMCID: PMC9746347 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Irani
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Traci L. Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Timothy E. Miller
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Benjamin D. Shogan
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joel E. Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel L. Feingold
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Amy L. Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic
| | - Ian M. Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin Z, Li Y, Wu J, Zheng H, Yang C. Nomogram for prediction of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal resection. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1273. [PMID: 36474177 PMCID: PMC9724353 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10377-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is a major complication in patients undergoing colorectal resection. The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors contributing to PPOI, and to develop an effective nomogram to determine the risks of this population. METHODS A total of 1,254 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent radical colorectal resection at Fujian Cancer Hospital from March 2016 to August 2021 were enrolled as a training cohort in this study. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine the correlation between PPOI and clinicopathological characteristics. A nomogram predicting the incidence of PPOI was constructed. The cohort of 153 patients from Fujian Provincial Hospital were enrolled as a validation cohort. Internal and external validations were used to evaluate the prediction ability by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and a calibration plot. RESULTS In the training cohort, 128 patients (10.2%) had PPOI after colorectal resection. The independent predictive factors of PPOI were identified, and included gender, age, surgical approach and intraoperative fluid overload. The AUC of nomogram were 0.779 (95% CI: 0.736-0.822) and 0.791 (95%CI: 0.677-0.905) in the training and validation cohort, respectively. The two cohorts of calibration plots showed a good consistency between nomogram prediction and actual observation. CONCLUSIONS A highly accurate nomogram was developed and validated in this study, which can be used to provide individual prediction of PPOI in patients after colorectal resection, and this predictive power can potentially assist surgeons to make the optimal treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenmeng Lin
- grid.415110.00000 0004 0605 1140Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014 Fujian Province China
| | - Yangming Li
- grid.415110.00000 0004 0605 1140Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014 Fujian Province China
| | - Jiansheng Wu
- grid.415108.90000 0004 1757 9178Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001 Fujian Province China
| | - Huizhe Zheng
- grid.415110.00000 0004 0605 1140Department of Anesthesiology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014 Fujian Province China
| | - Chunkang Yang
- grid.415110.00000 0004 0605 1140Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014 Fujian Province China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tolerating clear fluids diet on postoperative day 0 predicts early recovery of gastrointestinal function after laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:9262-9272. [PMID: 35254522 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09151-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A high proportion of colorectal surgery patients within an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) do not experience complications but remain hospitalized mainly waiting for gastrointestinal (GI) recovery. Accurate identification of these patients may allow discharge prior to the return of GI function. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine if tolerating clear fluid (CF) on postoperative day (POD) 0 was associated with uncomplicated return of GI function after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS Pooled data from three prospective studies from a single specialist colorectal referral center were analyzed (2013-2019). The present study included adult patients that underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy without stoma. Postoperative GI symptoms were collected daily in all three datasets. The main exposure variable, whether CF diet was tolerated on POD0, was defined as patients drinking at least 300 mL of CF without any nausea, anti-emetics, or vomiting (CF+ vs CF-). The main outcome measure was time to GI-3 (tolerating solid diet and passage of gas or stools). RESULTS A total of 221 patients were included in this study, including 69% CF+ and 31% CF-. The groups were similar in age, gender, and comorbidities, but the CF- patients were more likely to have surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. CF+ patients had faster time to GI-3 (mean 1.6d (SD 0.7) vs. 2.3d (SD 1.5), p < 0.001). The CF+ group also experienced fewer complications (19% vs. 35%, p = 0.009), shorter mean LOS (mean 3.6d (SD 2.9) vs. 6.2d (SD 9.4), p = 0.002), and were more likely to be discharged by the target LOS (66% vs. 50%, p = 0.024). CONCLUSION Toleration of CF on POD0 was associated with faster return of GI function, fewer complications, and shorter LOS. This may be used as a criteria for potential discharge prior to full return of GI function after laparoscopic colectomy within an ERP.
Collapse
|
9
|
Use of a mobile health application by adult non-congenital cardiac surgery patients: A feasibility study. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2022; 1:e0000055. [PMID: 36812537 PMCID: PMC9931304 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Mobile Health (mHealth) technologies are becoming integral to our healthcare system. This study evaluated the feasibility (compliance, usability and user satisfaction) of a mHealth application (app) for delivering Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) information to Cardiac Surgery (CS) patients peri-operatively. This single centre, prospective cohort study involved patients undergoing CS. Patients received a mHealth app developed for the study at consent and for 6-8 weeks post-surgery. Patients completed system usability, patient satisfaction and quality of life surveys pre- and post-surgery. A total of 65 patients participated in the study (mean age of 64 years). The app achieved an overall utilization rate of 75% (68% vs 81% for <65 and ≥65 years respectively). Pre-surgery, the majority of patients found the app easy to use (94%), user-friendly (89%), and felt confident using the app (92%). The majority also found the app's educational information useful (90%) and easy to find (88%). 75% of patients reported that they would like to use the app frequently. This percentage decreased to 57% in the post-discharge survey. A lower percentage of patients ≥65 years indicated their preference for the app over printed information (51% vs 87%) and their recommendation for the app (84% vs 100% for >65 and <65 years respectively) in the post-surgery survey. MHealth technology is feasible for peri-operative CS patient education, including older adult patients. The majority of patients were satisfied with the app and would recommend using it over the use of printed materials.
Collapse
|
10
|
Hardy PJ, Tavano A, Jacquet SV, Monseur JJ, Bastin ML, Kohnen LP, Haumann AE, Joris JL. The impact of orthostatic intolerance on early ambulation following abdominal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2022; 66:454-462. [PMID: 35118648 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of orthostatic intolerance on the day of surgery is more than 50% after abdominal surgery. The impact of orthostatic intolerance on ambulation on the day of surgery has been little studied. We investigated orthostatic intolerance and walking ability after colorectal and bariatric surgery in an enhanced recovery programme. METHODS Eighty-two patients (colorectal: n = 46, bariatric n = 36) were included and analysed in this prospective study. Walk tests for 2 min (2-MWT) and 6 min (6-MWT) were performed before and 24 h after surgery, and 3 h after surgery for 2-MWT. Orthostatic intolerance characterised by presyncopal symptoms when rising was recorded at the same time points. Multivariate binary logistic regressions modelling the probability of orthostatic intolerance and walking inability were performed taking into account potential risk factors. RESULTS Prevalence of orthostatic intolerance and walking inability was, respectively, 65% and 18% 3-hour after surgery. The day after surgery, patients' performance had greatly improved: approximately 20% of the patients experienced orthostatic intolerance, whilst only 5% of the patients were unable to walk. Adjusted binary logistic regressions demonstrated that age (p = .37), sex (p = .39), BMI (p = .74), duration of anaesthesia (p = .71) and type of surgery (p = .71) did not significantly influence walking ability. CONCLUSION Our study confirms that orthostatic intolerance was frequent (~ 60%) 3-hour after abdominal surgery but prevented a 2-MWT only in ~20% of patients. No risk factors for orthostatic intolerance and walking inability were evidenced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre‐Yves J‐P. Hardy
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine CHU Liège University of Liège Liège Belgium
- Groupe francophone de réhabilitation améliorée après chirurgie (GRACE; Francophone group for enhanced recovery after surgery) Beaumont France
| | - Alessandro Tavano
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine CHU Liège University of Liège Liège Belgium
| | - Sophie V. Jacquet
- Service of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation CHU Liège University of Liège Liège Belgium
| | - Justine J. Monseur
- Biostatistics Unit Department of Public Health University of Liège Liège Belgium
| | - Marie‐Hélène L. Bastin
- Service of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation CHU Liège University of Liège Liège Belgium
| | - Laurent P. Kohnen
- Service of Digestive Surgery CHU Liège University of Liège Liège Belgium
| | | | - Jean L. Joris
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine CHU Liège University of Liège Liège Belgium
- Groupe francophone de réhabilitation améliorée après chirurgie (GRACE; Francophone group for enhanced recovery after surgery) Beaumont France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gillis C, Ljungqvist O, Carli F. Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128:434-448. [PMID: 35012741 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This narrative review presents a biological rationale and evidence to describe how the preoperative condition of the patient contributes to postoperative morbidity. Any preoperative condition that prevents a patient from tolerating the physiological stress of surgery (e.g. poor cardiopulmonary reserve, sarcopaenia), impairs the stress response (e.g. malnutrition, frailty), and/or augments the catabolic response to stress (e.g. insulin resistance) is a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes. Prehabilitation interventions that include exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial components can be applied before surgery to strengthen physiological reserve and enhance functional capacity, which, in turn, supports recovery through attaining surgical resilience. Prehabilitation complements Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care to achieve optimal patient outcomes because recovery is not a passive process and it begins preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsia Gillis
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Francesco Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weed CN, Bernier GV, Christante DH, Feldmann T, Flum DR, Kaplan JA, Moonka R, Thirlby RC, Simianu VV. Evaluating variation in enhanced recovery for colorectal surgery: a report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:111-119. [PMID: 34610205 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM Robust data demonstrate that enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) decrease length of stay, complications and cost. However, little is known about the reasons for variation in compliance with ERPs. The aim of this work was to confirm the efficacy of ERPs in a regional network, and to determine factors that are associated with ERP delivery in diverse hospital settings. METHOD A prospective cohort of patients was created by recording all elective colorectal operations at hospitals in the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP). The delivery of 12 ERP components was tracked at all sites, and factors associated with ERP component delivery and affecting outcomes were reported. RESULTS From 2016 to 2019, 9274 elective colorectal operations were performed at 36 hospitals. Indications were 48% cancer, 23% diverticulitis and 8% inflammatory bowel disease. Minimally invasive surgery was used in 71%. The proportion of cases with six or more ERP components received increased from 23% in 2016 to 50% in 2019. An increase in components was associated with a shorter length of stay and fewer combined adverse events and reinterventions. Further, increasing numbers of ERP components provided an incremental benefit to patients even when delivered in a low-volume centre or by a low-volume surgeon, and regardless of patient presentation. CONCLUSION At SCOAP hospitals, the delivery of increasing numbers of ERP components was associated with improved perioperative outcomes and decreased complications after elective colorectal surgery. The variation in delivery of these evidence-based components in subsets of our cohort indicates an important opportunity for quality improvement initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina N Weed
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Greta V Bernier
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Clinic, University of Washington Medicine - Valley Medical Center, Renton, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - David R Flum
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jennifer A Kaplan
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ravi Moonka
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Richard C Thirlby
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Vlad V Simianu
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang F, Li L, Mi Y, Zou L, Chu X, Sun A, Sun H, Liu X, Xu X. Effectiveness of the Tailored, Early Comprehensive Rehabilitation Program (t-ECRP) based on ERAS in improving the physical function recovery for patients following minimally invasive esophagectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:5027-5036. [PMID: 35190895 PMCID: PMC9046291 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06924-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative rehabilitation management is essential to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Limited reports, however, have focused on quantitative, detailed early activity plans for patients receiving minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). The purpose of this research was to estimate the effectiveness of the Tailored, Early Comprehensive Rehabilitation Program (t-ECRP) based on ERAS in the recovery of bowel and physical functions for patients undergoing MIE. METHODS In this single-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group, randomized pilot clinical trial, patients admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2019 to February 2020 were selected and randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The participants in the IG received medical care based on the t-ECRP strategy during perioperative period, and participants in the CG received routine care. The recovery of bowel and physical functions, readiness for hospital discharge (RHD), and postoperative hospital stay were evaluated on the day of discharge. RESULTS Two hundred and fifteen cases with esophageal cancer (EC) were enrolled and randomized to the IG (n = 107) or CG (n = 108). The mean age was 62.58 years (SD 9.07) and 71.16% were male. For EC, 53.49% were mid-location cancers and 79.07% were classified as pathological stage II and III cancers. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics and baseline physical functions. Participants in the IG group presented significantly shorter lengths of time to first flatus (P < 0.001), first postoperative bowel movement (P = 0.024), and for up and go test (P < 0.001), and lower scores of frailty (P < 0.001). The analysis also showed that participants in the IG had higher scores of RHD and shorter lengths of postoperative stay than in the CG (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The t-ECRP appears to improve bowel and physical function recovery, ameliorate RHD, and shorten postoperative hospital stay for patients undergoing MIE. Clinicians should consider prescribing quantitative, detailed, and individualized early activity plans for these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01998230).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Funa Yang
- Nursing Department, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008 China
| | - Lijuan Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000 China
| | - Yanzhi Mi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000 China
| | - Limin Zou
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000 China
| | - Xiaofei Chu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000 China
| | - Aiying Sun
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000 China
| | - Haibo Sun
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000 China
| | - Xianben Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000 China
| | - Xiaoxia Xu
- Nursing Department, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008 China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pecorelli N, Mazza M, Guarneri G, Delpini R, Partelli S, Balzano G, Turi S, Meani R, Beretta L, Falconi M. Impact of care pathway adherence on recovery following distal pancreatectomy within an enhanced recovery program. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1815-1823. [PMID: 33975798 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In bowel surgery, adherence to enhanced recovery program (ERP) has been associated with improved recovery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of adherence to ERP elements on outcomes, and identify factors associated with successful recovery following distal pancreatectomy (DP). METHODS Data for 376 patients who underwent DP managed within an ERP including 16 perioperative elements were reviewed. Primary endpoint was successful recovery, a composite outcome defined as length of hospital stay≤7 days, no severe complications nor readmissions. RESULTS Patients had a mean (SD) overall adherence of 76 (14)%. Overall, 166 (44%) patients had a successful recovery. There was a positive association between overall adherence and successful recovery (OR 1.19, 95%CI 1.08-1.31 for every additional element, p = 0.001), while an inverse relationship was found with comprehensive complication index (8% reduction, 95%CI -15 to -2%, p = 0.011). Adherence to postoperative phase interventions had the greatest impact on recovery (OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.13-1.47 for every additional postoperative element; p < 0.001). At multivariable regression, early termination of IV fluids was the only ERP element associated with successful recovery (OR 2.80, 95%CI 1.73-4.54; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Increased adherence to ERP elements was associated with successful early recovery and reduction of postoperative complication severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Pecorelli
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Guarneri
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Partelli
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Balzano
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Turi
- Department of Anesthesia, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Renato Meani
- Department of Anesthesia, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Beretta
- Department of Anesthesia, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rollins KE, Lobo DN, Joshi GP. Enhanced recovery after surgery: Current status and future progress. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2021; 35:479-489. [PMID: 34801211 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways were first introduced almost a quarter of a century ago and represent a paradigm shift in perioperative care that reduced postoperative complications and hospital length of stay, improved postoperative quality of life, and reduced overall healthcare costs. Gradual recognition of the generalizability of the interventions and transferable improvements in postoperative outcomes, led them to become standard of care for several surgical procedures. In this article, we critically review the current status of ERAS pathways, address related controversies, and propose measures for future progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie E Rollins
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Dileep N Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Balvardi S, Feldman LS, Fiore JF. Response to the Comment on "Impact of Facilitation of Early Mobilization on Postoperative Pulmonary Outcomes After Colorectal Surgery": A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2021; 274:e940. [PMID: 34784687 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Saba Balvardi
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Concin N, Planchamp F, Abu-Rustum NR, Ataseven B, Cibula D, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Knapp P, Marth C, Morice P, Querleu D, Sehouli J, Stepanyan A, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zapardiel I, Persson J. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1508-1529. [PMID: 34795020 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of surgical care as a crucial component of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary management improves outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma, notably helping to avoid suboptimal surgical treatment. Quality indicators (QIs) enable healthcare professionals to measure their clinical management with regard to ideal standards of care. OBJECTIVE In order to complete its set of QIs for the surgical management of gynecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) initiated the development of QIs for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS QIs were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and documentation of the scientific evidence, two consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians and patient representatives. QIs were defined using a structured format comprising metrics specifications, and targets. A scoring system was then developed to ensure applicability and feasibility of a future ESGO accreditation process based on these QIs for endometrial carcinoma surgery and support any institutional or governmental quality assurance programs. RESULTS Twenty-nine structural, process and outcome indicators were defined. QIs 1-5 are general indicators related to center case load, training, experience of the surgeon, structured multi-disciplinarity of the team and active participation in clinical research. QIs 6 and 7 are related to the adequate pre-operative investigations. QIs 8-22 are related to peri-operative standards of care. QI 23 is related to molecular markers for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis and as determinants for treatment decisions. QI 24 addresses the compliance of management of patients after primary surgical treatment with the standards of care. QIs 25-29 highlight the need for a systematic assessment of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcome as well as standardized and comprehensive documentation of surgical and pathological elements. Each QI was associated with a score. An assessment form including a scoring system was built as basis for ESGO accreditation of centers for endometrial cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria .,Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial Sloann Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pawel Knapp
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Oncology Center of Bialystok, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Alsace, France
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Artem Stepanyan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Nairi Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, VKV American Hospital, Istambul, Turkey
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bertocchi E, Barugola G, Gentile I, Zuppini T, Zamperini M, Guerriero M, Avesani R, Bonadiman S, Anselmi C, Ruffo G. iColon, a patient-focused mobile application for perioperative care in colorectal surgery: an observational, real-world study protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045526. [PMID: 34728438 PMCID: PMC8565532 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol provides optimised care guidelines for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. To ensure high compliance with active ERAS elements, patients must be educated to actively participate in the perioperative care pathway. Mobile health is a rapidly expanding area of the digital health sector that is effective in educating and engaging patients during follow-up. iColon is a mobile application designed by the Operative Unit of General Surgery of IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital of Negrar of Valpolicella, which is specifically targeted at patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. iColon is organised into ERAS phases, and it provides real-time feedback to surgeons about a patient's adherence to perioperative active ERAS elements. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We hypothesise that by providing a patient-focused mobile application, compliance with active ERAS elements could be improved.The first coprimary objective is to build patient confidence in using the mobile application, iColon, during perioperative care. The second coprimary objective is to establish patient compliance with active ERAS elements.Secondary objectives include examining: length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction of received care.This study is a prospective observational real-world study of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery who are following the ERAS protocol and using iColon during perioperative periods between September 2020 and December 2022.By educating and engaging patients in the ERAS protocol, the mobile application, iColon, should stimulate patients to be more proactive in managing their healthcare by complying more closely with active ERAS elements. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by the local Ethics Committee with the protocol number 29219 of 25 May 2020. The results will be actively disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and various community engagement activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Bertocchi
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuliano Barugola
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Irene Gentile
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Teresa Zuppini
- Hospital Pharmacy, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Zamperini
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Guerriero
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Clinical Research Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Renato Avesani
- Rehabilitation Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Silvia Bonadiman
- Rehabilitation Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Anselmi
- Dietetic Service, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cardell CF, Knapp L, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Wick EC. Successful Implementation of Enhanced Recovery in Elective Colorectal Surgery is Variable and Dependent on the Local Environment. Ann Surg 2021; 274:605-612. [PMID: 34506315 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate local hospital success with enhanced recovery implementation as measured by colorectal surgery process measure (PM) compliance and characterize local environment factors associated with success within a contemporary quality improvement collaborative. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Enhanced recovery programs (ERP) have proven an effective perioperative quality improvement strategy, but local variation in implementation can hinder patient outcome improvement. METHODS Individual hospitals participating in a national colorectal ERP quality improvement program were evaluated with quantitative (patient-level process and outcome) and qualitative (survey and structured interviews with hospital teams) data between 2017 and 2020. Hospitals with implementation success were identified: high performers (80% of elective colorectal surgery patients compliant with >6/9 PMs) and high improvers (top quartile of PM adherence improvement over time). Hospital and implementation characteristics were compared with chi-square tests. Trends in average annual outcome change were estimated with logistic and linear regression. RESULTS Of 207 total hospitals, 62 were characterized as High Performance and 52 as High Improvement. High Performance hospitals were larger, with more annual colorectal surgeries (128 vs 101, P = 0.039). Qualitative assessment revealed fewer barriers of staff buy-in and competing priorities, and more experience with standardized perioperative care in High Performance hospitals. High Improvement hospitals had lower baseline PM adherence (54.1% vs 69.6%, P < 0.001) and less experience with standardized perioperative care (30.8% vs 58.1%, P < 0.001) but were noted to have a positive trend in annual patient outcomes: annual morbidity (Δ-1.14% vs -0.20%, P = 0.035), readmission (Δ-1.85% vs 0.002%, P = 0.037), and prolonged length of stay (Δ-3.94 vs -1.19, P = 0.037) compared to Low Improvement hospitals. CONCLUSIONS When evaluating a collection of hospitals implementing ERP, only half of hospitals reached consistent High Performance or high improvement. Characteristics of the local environment need further study to understand the barriers to effective implementation in a pragmatic setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea F Cardell
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Leandra Knapp
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark E Cohen
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Clifford Y Ko
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth C Wick
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Armstrong Institute for Quality and Safety, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
[Elective colorectal fast-track resections-Treatment adherence due to coordination by specialized nursing personnel]. Chirurg 2021; 93:499-508. [PMID: 34468784 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01484-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Fast-track treatment pathways reduce the frequency of postoperative complications in elective colorectal resections by approximately 40% and due to the rapid recovery reduce the postoperative duration of hospitalization by approximately 50%. Specialized nursing personnel (enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS, nurses) have already been appointed internationally to accompany and monitor the execution of multimodal perioperative treatment. In November 2018 a fast-track assistant was appointed in the Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery of the Municipal Clinic in Solingen for coordination of the fast-track treatment pathway. The results confirmed that a high adherence to perioperative fast-track treatment concepts can also be achieved in the German healthcare system by the assignment of specialized nursing personnel, with the known advantages for patients, nursing personnel, physicians and hospital sponsors.
Collapse
|
21
|
Delivery of ERAS Care in an Academic Hospital: An Analysis of Pathway Deviations and Obstacles to Adherence. Am J Med Qual 2021; 36:320-327. [PMID: 33967194 DOI: 10.1097/01.jmq.0000735452.37223.72] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways in colorectal surgery improve outcomes and reduce disparities, but pathway adherence rates are variable. Sustainability of adherence following initial implementation, particularly in academic settings with trainee involvement, is underexplored. This study measures and describes ERAS adherence for 163 consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal resection in an academic colorectal surgery department with a well-established ERAS pathway. Providers, including residents and nursing staff, were surveyed regarding pathway knowledge and obstacles to adherence. Adherence was higher preoperatively (80%) and intraoperatively (93%) than postoperatively (61%). Opioid-sparing analgesia and bowel motility agents were underdosed on up to 63% of hospital days, without clinical rationale in ≥50% of cases. Providers cited peer teaching (71%) as the primary source of pathway knowledge and identified individual surgeon preferences as an obstacle to adherence. Formalized ERAS pathway education, communication, and coordination among attending physicians are needed to reduce provider-driven deviation in an academic setting.
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Regenbogen SE, Cain-Nielsen AH, Syrjamaki JD, Norton EC. Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery Dissemination in Michigan Hospitals. Ann Surg 2021; 274:199-205. [PMID: 33351489 PMCID: PMC8211908 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate real-world effects of enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) dissemination on clinical and economic outcomes after colectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Hospitals aiming to accelerate discharge and reduce spending after surgery are increasingly adopting perioperative ERPs. Despite their efficacy in specialty institutions, most studies have lacked adequate control groups and diverse hospital settings and have considered only in-hospital costs. There remain concerns that accelerated discharge might incur unintended consequences. METHODS Retrospective, population-based cohort including patients in 72 hospitals in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative clinical registry (N = 13,611) and/or Michigan Value Collaborative claims registry (N = 14,800) who underwent elective colectomy, 2012 to 2018. Marginal effects of ERP on clinical outcomes and risk-adjusted, price-standardized 90-day episode payments were evaluated using mixed-effects models to account for secular trends and hospital performance unrelated to ERP. RESULTS In 24 ERP hospitals, patients Post-ERP had significantly shorter length of stay than those Pre-ERP (5.1 vs 6.5 days, P < 0.001), lower incidence of complications (14.6% vs 16.9%, P < 0.001) and readmissions (10.4% vs 11.3%, P = 0.02), and lower episode payments ($28,550 vs $31,192, P < 0.001) and postacute care ($3,384 vs $3,909, P < 0.001). In mixed-effects adjusted analyses, these effects were significantly attenuated-ERP was associated with a marginal length of stay reduction of 0.4 days (95% confidence interval 0.2-0.6 days, P = 0.001), and no significant difference in complications, readmissions, or overall spending. CONCLUSIONS ERPs are associated with small reduction in postoperative length of hospitalization after colectomy, without unwanted increases in readmission or postacute care spending. The real-world effects across a variety of hospitals may be smaller than observed in early-adopting specialty centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott E Regenbogen
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Michigan Value Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Anne H Cain-Nielsen
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - John D Syrjamaki
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Michigan Value Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Edward C Norton
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Michigan Value Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Economics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ruel M, Ramirez Garcia M, Arbour C. Transition from hospital to home after elective colorectal surgery performed in an enhanced recovery program: An integrative review. Nurs Open 2021; 8:1550-1570. [PMID: 34102021 PMCID: PMC8186688 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to investigate the transition from hospital to home after elective colorectal surgery performed in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme. DESIGN An integrative review. METHODS A search of ten electronic databases was conducted. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors. Data analysis and synthesis were based on Meleis' Transitions Theory (2010). RESULTS Forty-two articles were included, and most (N = 27) were of good or very good quality. The researchers identified five categories to document the nature of transition postsurgery, three conditions affecting such transition, eleven indicators informing about the quality of the transition and several nursing interventions. Overall, this review revealed that the transition from hospital to home after ERAS colorectal surgery is complex. A holistic understanding of this phenomenon may help nurses to recognize what they need to do to optimize the in-home recovery of this clientele.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria‐Pilar Ramirez Garcia
- Faculty of NursingUniversité de MontréalMontréalQCCanada
- Research CenterCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMontréalQCCanada
| | - Caroline Arbour
- Faculty of NursingUniversité de MontréalMontréalQCCanada
- Research CenterHôpital du Sacré‐Cœur de MontréalCIUSSS du Nord‐de‐l’Île‐de‐MontréalMontréalQCCanada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zorrilla-Vaca A, Stone AB, Ripolles-Melchor J, Abad-Motos A, Ramirez-Rodriguez JM, Galan-Menendez P, Mena GE, Grant MC. Institutional factors associated with adherence to enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery: Secondary analysis of a multicenter study. J Clin Anesth 2021; 74:110378. [PMID: 34144497 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adherence to Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) is associated with faster functional recovery, better patient satisfaction, lower complication rates and reduced length of hospital stay. Understanding institutional barriers and facilitators is essential for improving adherence to ERPs. The purpose of this study was to identify institutional factors associated with adherence to an ERP for colorectal surgery. METHODS A secondary analysis of a nationwide study was conducted including 686 patients who underwent colorectal surgery across twenty-one institutions in Spain. Adherence to ERPs was calculated based upon the components recommended by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society. Institutional characteristics (i.e., case volume, ERP duration, anesthesia staff size, multidisciplinary meetings, leadership discipline) were captured from each participating program. Multivariable regression was performed to determine characteristics associated with adherence. RESULTS The median adherence to ERAS was 68.2% (IQR 59.1%-81.8%). Multivariable linear regression revealed that anesthesiologist leadership (+5.49%, 95%CI +2.81% to +8.18%, P < 0.01), duration of ERAS implementation (+0.46% per year, 95%CI +0.06% to +0.86%, P < 0.01) and the use of regular multidisciplinary meetings (+4.66%, 95%CI +0.06 to +7.74%, P < 0.01) were independently associated with greater adherence. Case volume (-2.38% per 4 cases weekly, 95%CI -3.03 to -1.74, P < 0.01) and number of anesthesia providers (-1.19% per 10 providers, 95%CI +2.23 to -8.18%, P < 0.01) were negatively associated with adherence. CONCLUSION Adherence to ERPs is strongly associated with anesthesiology leadership, regular multidisciplinary meetings, and program duration, whereas case volume and the size of the anesthesia staff were potential barriers. These findings highlight the importance of strong leadership, experience and establishing a multidisciplinary team when developing an ERP for colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Zorrilla-Vaca
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Alexander B Stone
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Javier Ripolles-Melchor
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ane Abad-Motos
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Gabriel E Mena
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael C Grant
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Impact of Early Mobilization on Recovery after Major Head and Neck Surgery with Free Flap Reconstruction. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13122852. [PMID: 34201003 PMCID: PMC8227616 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary For patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC), surgery to remove the tumour is a standard treatment. The surgery is complex-in most cases, the mouth and throat need to be rebuilt using tissue from another area of the body to restore appearance and function. Recovery from HNC surgery is challenging, and complications occur frequently. It is recommended that patients get out of bed and move (are “mobilized”) as early as possible after surgery (within 24 h) to improve recovery. However, evidence for this recommendation mainly comes from other types of cancer. Therefore, this study investigated whether early mobilization impacts recovery in patients undergoing HNC surgery. We found that delaying mobilization (after 24 h) was linked with more complications and a longer stay in the hospital. Helping patients mobilize within 24 h after HNC surgery should be a priority for healthcare teams. Abstract Surgery with free flap reconstruction is a standard treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). Because of the complexity of HNC surgery, recovery can be challenging, and complications are common. One of the foundations of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is early postoperative mobilization. The ERAS guidelines for HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction recommend mobilization within 24 h. This is based mainly on evidence from other surgical disciplines, and the extent to which mobilization within 24 h improves recovery after HNC surgery has not been explored. This retrospective analysis included 445 patients from the Calgary Head and Neck Enhanced Recovery Program. Mobilization after 24 h was associated with more complications of any type (OR = 1.73, 95% CI [confidence interval] = 1.16–2.57) and more major complications (OR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.00–3.16). When accounting for patient and clinical factors, mobilization after 48 h was a significant predictor of major complications (OR = 2.61; 95% CI = 1.10–6.21) and prolonged length of stay (>10 days; OR = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.41–5.76). This comprehensive analysis of the impact of early mobilization on postoperative complications and length of stay in a large HNC cohort provides novel evidence supporting adherence to the ERAS early mobilization recommendations. Early mobilization should be a priority for patients undergoing HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction.
Collapse
|
27
|
Caminsky NG, Hamad D, He BH, Zhao K, Al Mahroos M, Feldman LS, Lee L, Boutros M, Fiore JF. Optimizing discharge decision-making in colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study of discharge practices in a recently implemented enhanced recovery pathway. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1507-1514. [PMID: 33423346 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The objectives of this project were (1) to compare time to readiness for discharge by set criteria and actual length of stay (LOS) in a newly implemented colorectal enhanced recovery pathway and (2) to identify reasons for delayed hospital discharge. METHOD We conducted a prospective cohort study of 73 adult patients (age 67 ± 14 years, 56% men, 51% laparoscopic, 13% stoma creation) undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a university hospital with a recently implemented recovery pathway (<2 years). Time to readiness for discharge (oral intake, flatus, pain control, ability to walk, and no complications) was compared to actual LOS using a correlation-adjusted log-rank test. The treating team was interviewed, and thematic analysis was used to identify reasons for patients remaining in hospital after discharge criteria (DC) were achieved. RESULTS Median LOS was 6 (4-8) days and median time to readiness for discharge was 5 (3-8) days (P < 0.001). Twenty-eight patients (37%) remained in hospital after DC were achieved. Although some delayed discharges were medically justified (e.g., workup [13%] or treatment of complications not captured by DC [2.6%]), unnecessary hospital stays were common (e.g., perceived need for observation [16%], or patients not willing to be discharged [11%]). CONCLUSIONS Unnecessary hospital stays were common within a recently implemented enhanced recovery pathway and represent a target for quality improvement. Efforts should be directed at optimizing patient education regarding discharge expectations, early consultation of the discharge planning team and improving discharge decision-making using standardized DC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha G Caminsky
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Doulia Hamad
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Billy Haitian He
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kaiqiong Zhao
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Liane S Feldman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marylise Boutros
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Julio F Fiore
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Díaz-Vico T, Cheng YL, Bowers SP, Arasi LC, Chadha RM, Elli EF. Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols Versus Conventional Management in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 32:176-182. [PMID: 33989060 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways focus on decreasing surgical stress and promoting return to normal function for patients undergoing surgical procedures. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of an ERAS protocol on outcomes of patients undergoing primary sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), and management of postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) measured by pain medications and antiemetic use, respectively. Incidence of 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and complications were also analyzed. Methods: A retrospective review was performed from October 1, 2016 to October 31, 2018 of patients enrolled in the ERAS versus the conventional pathway. Patient baseline characteristics, pain and nausea scores, LOS, and postoperative outcome variables were collected. Results: Non-ERAS (n = 193) and ERAS (n = 173) groups had similar patient characteristics. Fewer ERAS patients required postoperative opioids and antiemetics (P < .01), with a significant difference in postoperative nausea control in favor of ERAS patients (P < .05). There was a decreasing trend in median LOS (2 versus 1, P = .28), 90-day postoperative readmissions (10.4% versus 8.1%, P = .47), and major adverse events (5.2% versus 1.7%, P = .07) after ERAS implementation. The ED visits and postoperative need for intravenous fluid for dehydration were significantly lower in the ERAS group (P = .01). Conclusion: Implementation of ERAS pathway for bariatric surgery was associated with less opioid usage, PONV, ED visits, and postoperative need for intravenous fluids, without increasing LOS, 90-day readmission or rates of adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Díaz-Vico
- Divisions of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Yilon Lima Cheng
- Divisions of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Steven P Bowers
- Divisions of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Lisa C Arasi
- Divisions of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Ryan M Chadha
- Divisions of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Enrique F Elli
- Divisions of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Balvardi S, Pecorelli N, Castelino T, Niculiseanu P, Alhashemi M, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F, Mayo NE, Feldman LS, Fiore JF. Impact of Facilitation of Early Mobilization on Postoperative Pulmonary Outcomes After Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2021; 273:868-875. [PMID: 32324693 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the extent to which staff-directed facilitation of early mobilization impacts recovery of pulmonary function and 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after colorectal surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Early mobilization after surgery is believed to improve pulmonary function and prevent PPCs; however, adherence is low. The value of allocating resources (eg, staff time) to increase early mobilization is unknown. METHODS This study involved the analysis of a priori secondary outcomes of a pragmatic, observer-blind, randomized trial. Consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomized 1:1 to usual care (preoperative education) or facilitated mobilization (staff dedicated to assist transfers and walking during hospital stay). Forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and peak cough flow were measured preoperatively and at 1, 2, 3 days and 4 weeks after surgery. PPCs were defined according to the European Perioperative Clinical Outcome Taskforce. RESULTS Ninety-nine patients (57% male, 80% laparoscopic, median age 63, and predicted FEV1 97%) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (usual care 49, facilitated mobilization 50). There was no between-group difference in recovery of forced vital capacity [adjusted difference in slopes 0.002 L/d (95% CI -0.01 to 0.01)], FEV1 [-0.002 L/d (-0.01 to 0.01)] or peak cough flow [-0.002 L/min/d (-0.02 to 0.02)]. Thirty-day PPCs were also not different between groups [adjusted odds ratio 0.67 (0.23-1.99)]. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized controlled trial, staff-directed facilitation of early mobilization did not improve postoperative pulmonary function or reduce PPCs within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02131844.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saba Balvardi
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nicolò Pecorelli
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tanya Castelino
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Petru Niculiseanu
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mohsen Alhashemi
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Barry Stein
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Franco Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nancy E Mayo
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julio F Fiore
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Effect of two different pre-operative exercise training regimens before colorectal surgery on functional capacity: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2021; 37:969-978. [PMID: 32976204 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimodal prehabilitation, including exercise training, nutritional therapy and anxiety reduction, has been shown to attenuate functional decline associated with surgery. Due to the growing interest in functional status as a targeted surgical outcome, a better understanding of the optimal prescription of exercise is critical. OBJECTIVE The objective is to compare peri-operative functional trajectory in response to two different exercise training protocols within a 4-week, supervised, multimodal prehabilitation programme. DESIGN This was a single blinded, single centre, randomised controlled study. Participants performed four assessments: at baseline, after prehabilitation (just before surgery), and at 1 and 2 months after surgery. PATIENTS Adult patients scheduled for elective resection of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer were included provided there were no absolute contraindications to exercise nor poor language comprehension. INTERVENTION Patients followed either high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), as part of a 4-week multimodal prehabilitation programme. Both groups followed the same supervised resistance training, nutritional therapy and anxiety reduction interventions. All patients followed standardised peri-operative management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Changes in oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold, measured with sequential cardio-pulmonary exercise testing, were assessed and compared between groups. RESULTS Forty two patients were included in the primary analysis (HIIT n = 21 vs. MICT n = 21), with mean ± SD age 64.5 ± 11.2 years and 62% were men. At 2 months after surgery, 13/21 (62%) in HIIT and 11/21 (52%) in MICT attended the study visits. Both protocols significantly enhanced pre-operative functional capacity, with no difference between groups: mean (95% confidence interval) oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold 1.97 (0.75 to 3.19) ml kg min in HIIT vs. 1.71 (0.56 to 2.85) in MICT, P = 0.753. At 2 months after surgery, the HIIT group showed a higher improvement in physical fitness: 2.36 (0.378 to 4.34) ml kg min, P = 0.021. No adverse events occurred during the intervention. CONCLUSION Both MICT and HIIT enhanced pre-operative functional capacity. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03361150.
Collapse
|
31
|
Tankou JI, Foley O, Falzone M, Kalyanaraman R, Elias KM. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols improve time to return to intended oncology treatment following interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced gynecologic cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1145-1153. [PMID: 33858950 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine whether the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is associated with earlier return to intended oncology treatment following interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced gynecologic cancers. METHODS Participants comprised consecutive patients (n=278) with a preoperative diagnosis of stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer, divided into those that received treatment before versus after implementation of an ERAS protocol at our institution. All patients received at least three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a platinum based regimen and underwent interval cytoreduction via laparotomy with the intent to deliver additional cycles of chemotherapy postoperatively. The primary outcome was defined as the timely return to intended oncologic treatment, defined as the percentage of patients initiating adjuvant chemotherapy within 28 days postoperatively. RESULTS The study cohorts included 150 pre-ERAS patients and 128 post-ERAS patients. Median age was 65 years (range 58-71). Most patients (211; 75.9%) had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3, and the median operative time was 174 min (range 137-219). Median length of stay was 4 days (range 3-5 days) in the pre-ERAS cohort versus 3 days (range 3-4) in the post-ERAS cohort (p<0.0001). At 28 days after operation, 80% of patients had resumed chemotherapy in the post-ERAS cohort compared with 64% in the pre-ERAS cohort (odds ratio (OR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36 to 3.84; p=0.002). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the ERAS protocol was the strongest predictor of timely return to intended oncology treatment (OR 10.18, 95% CI 5.35 to 20.32). CONCLUSION An ERAS protocol for gynecologic oncology patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery is associated with earlier resumption of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Isabelle Tankou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Olivia Foley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michele Falzone
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Kevin M Elias
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mazzotta E, Villalobos-Hernandez EC, Fiorda-Diaz J, Harzman A, Christofi FL. Postoperative Ileus and Postoperative Gastrointestinal Tract Dysfunction: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Novel Treatment Strategies Beyond Colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:583422. [PMID: 33390950 PMCID: PMC7774512 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.583422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Postoperative ileus (POI) and postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction (POGD) are well-known complications affecting patients undergoing intestinal surgery. GI symptoms include nausea, vomiting, pain, abdominal distention, bloating, and constipation. These iatrogenic disorders are associated with extended hospitalizations, increased morbidity, and health care costs into the billions and current therapeutic strategies are limited. This is a narrative review focused on recent concepts in the pathogenesis of POI and POGD, pipeline drugs or approaches to treatment. Mechanisms, cellular targets and pathways implicated in the pathogenesis include gut surgical manipulation and surgical trauma, neuroinflammation, reactive enteric glia, macrophages, mast cells, monocytes, neutrophils and ICC's. The precise interactions between immune, inflammatory, neural and glial cells are not well understood. Reactive enteric glial cells are an emerging therapeutic target that is under intense investigation for enteric neuropathies, GI dysmotility and POI. Our review emphasizes current therapeutic strategies, starting with the implementation of colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to protect against POI and POGD. However, despite colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery, it remains a significant medical problem and burden on the healthcare system. Over 100 pipeline drugs or treatments are listed in Clin.Trials.gov. These include 5HT4R agonists (Prucalopride and TAK 954), vagus nerve stimulation of the ENS-macrophage nAChR cholinergic pathway, acupuncture, herbal medications, peripheral acting opioid antagonists (Alvimopen, Methlnaltexone, Naldemedine), anti-bloating/flatulence drugs (Simethiocone), a ghreline prokinetic agonist (Ulimovelin), drinking coffee, and nicotine chewing gum. A better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms for short and long-term outcomes is necessary before we can develop better prophylactic and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvio Mazzotta
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | | | - Juan Fiorda-Diaz
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Alan Harzman
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Fievos L. Christofi
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
An AHRQ national quality improvement project for implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2020.100778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
34
|
Catarci M, Benedetti M, Maurizi A, Spinelli F, Bernacconi T, Guercioni G, Campagnacci R. ERAS pathway in colorectal surgery: structured implementation program and high adherence for improved outcomes. Updates Surg 2020; 73:123-137. [PMID: 33094366 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00885-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Although there is clear evidence that an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery leads to significantly reduced morbidity rates and length of hospital stay (LOS), it is still unclear what modalities and levels of implementation of the program are necessary to achieve these results. The purpose of this study is to analyze the methods and results of the first year of structured implementation of a colorectal ERAS program in two surgical units of the Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR) Marche in Italy. A two-center observational study on a prospectively maintained database was performed on 196 consecutive colorectal resections (excluding emergencies and American Society of Anesthesiologists class > III cases) over a 1-year period. More than 50 variables including adherence to the individual items of the ERAS program were considered. Primary outcomes were overall morbidity, major morbidity, mortality and anastomotic leakage rates; secondary outcomes were LOS, re-admission and re-operation. The results were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses through logistic regression. After a median follow-up of 39.5 days, we recorded complications in 72 patients (overall morbidity 36.7%), major complications in 14 patients (major morbidity 7.1%), 6 deaths (mortality 3.1%), anastomotic dehiscence in 9 cases (4.9%), mean overall LOS of 6.6 days, 10 readmissions (5.1%) and 13 reoperations (6.7%). The mean adherence rate to the items of the ERAS program was 85.4%, showing a significant dose-effect curve for overall and major morbidity rates, anastomotic leakage rates and LOS. The implementation methods of a colorectal ERAS program in this study led to a high adherence (> 80%) to the program items. High adherence had significant effects also on major morbidity and anastomotic leakage rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy. .,Direttore UOC Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale "C. e G. Mazzoni"-AV5-ASUR Marche, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
| | - Michele Benedetti
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Angela Maurizi
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Francesco Spinelli
- Anesthesiology Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Tonino Bernacconi
- Anesthesiology Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Gianluca Guercioni
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Roberto Campagnacci
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fischer CP, Knapp L, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Reinke CE, Wick EC. Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery in Emergency Colorectal Operation. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 232:178-185. [PMID: 33069852 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency colorectal operations account for considerable surgical morbidity, leading to increased recognition of the importance of standardized care. Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) have successfully provided a framework to standardize elective surgical care, with some ERP elements spreading to emergency procedures. This study aims to characterize the degree of spread and demonstrate feasibility of ERP extension to emergency colorectal operations. STUDY DESIGN Patients undergoing colorectal operations were identified from a national ERP collaborative. Adherence to ERP process measures-multimodal pain control, early Foley removal, postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, early mobilization, early feeding, and 30-day clinical outcomes-was analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate association between process measure adherence and 30-day clinical outcomes. RESULTS A total of 31,511 patients underwent colorectal operations at 235 hospitals; 3,086 were emergencies and 28,425 were elective. For emergency cases, rates of early Foley removal (92.0%) and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (75.7%) were highest. Rates of multimodal pain control (55.9%), early mobilization (37.1%), and early liquid intake (33.4%) were modest. Nonadherence was more common in patients younger than 65 years (43.4%), with independent functional status (94%), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification 1 to 3 (62.5%), and without physiologic derangement (39.9%). Lack of mobilization or liquid intake was independently associated with increased odds of ileus (odds ratio [OR] 1.43; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.75 and OR 2.41; 95% CI, 1.96 to 2.95) and prolonged length of stay (OR 2.29; 95% CI, 1.85 to 2.83 and OR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.70 to 2.47). CONCLUSIONS Although the unplanned nature of emergency colorectal operations historically excluded patients from ERPs, our findings suggest ERPs have observable diffusion beyond elective surgical procedures. Deliberate implementation with adherence auditing can improve ERP uptake and outcomes in emergency colorectal operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea P Fischer
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL.
| | - Leandra Knapp
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
| | - Mark E Cohen
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
| | - Clifford Y Ko
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL; Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Elizabeth C Wick
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Armstrong Institute for Quality and Safety, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Simple Versus Complex Preoperative Carbohydrate Drink to Preserve Perioperative Insulin Sensitivity in Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2020; 271:819-826. [PMID: 31356274 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
37
|
Barbero M, García J, Alonso I, Alonso L, San Antonio-San Román B, Molnar V, León C, Cea M. ERAS protocol compliance impact on functional recovery in colorectal surgery. Cir Esp 2020; 99:108-114. [PMID: 32564875 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Compliance to ERAS protocols is a process quality measure that is associated to better outcomes. The main objective of this study is to analyze the association between protocol compliance, surgical stress and functional recovery. The secondary objective is to identify independent factors associated to functional recovery. METHODS A prospective observational single-centre study was performed. Patients who had scheduled colorectal surgery within an ERAS program from January 2017 to June 2018 were included. We analysed the relationship between protocol compliance percentage and surgical stress (defined by C reactive protein [CRP] blood levels on postoperative 3rd day), and functional recovery (defined by the proportion of patients who meet the discharge criteria on the 5th PO day or before). Multivariate analysis was performed to asses independent factor associated to functional recovery. RESULTS 313 were included. For every additional percentage point of compliance to the protocol 3rd day C reactive protein plasmatic level decreases 1,46 mg/dL and increases 7% the probability to meet the discharge criteria (p < 0.001 both). Independent factors associated to functional recovery were ASA III-IV (OR 0.26; 0.14-0.48), surgical CR-POSSUM score (OR 0.68; 0.57-0.83), early mobilization (OR 4.22; 1.43-12.4) and removal of urinary catheter (OR 3.35; 1.79-6.27), p < 0,001 each of them. CONCLUSION Better compliance to ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery decreases surgical stress and accelerates functional recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macarena Barbero
- Servicio Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, España.
| | - Javier García
- Servicio Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, España; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, España
| | - Isabel Alonso
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, España
| | - Laura Alonso
- Servicio Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, España
| | - Belén San Antonio-San Román
- Servicio Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, España
| | - Viktoria Molnar
- Servicio Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, España
| | - Carmen León
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, España
| | - Matías Cea
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pickens R, Cochran A, Tezber K, Berry R, Bhattacharya E, Koo D, King L, Iannitti DA, Martinie JB, Baker EH, Ocuin LM, Hunt J, Vrochides D. Using a Mobile Application for Real-Time Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery within an ERAS® Pathway. Am Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481908500847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential for patient-centered health care. This pilot study implemented a mobile application customized to an hepatopancreatobiliary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) program—a novel environment—for real-time collection of PROs, including ERAS® pathway compliance. Patients undergoing hepatectomy, distal pancreatectomy, or pancreaticoduodenectomy through the ERAS® program were prospectively enrolled over 10 months. The application provided education and questionnaires before surgery through 30 days postdischarge. Thresholds were set for initial adoption of the application (75%), PRO response rate (50%), and patient satisfaction (75%). Daily postdischarge health checks integrated customized responses to guide out-of-hospital care. Of 165 enrolled patients, 122 met inclusion criteria. Application adoption was 93 per cent (114/122) and in-hospital engagement remained high at 88 per cent (107/122). Patients completed 62 per cent of PRO on quality of life, postoperative pain, nausea, opioid consumption, and compliance to ERAS® pathway items, including ambulation and breathing exercises. During postcharge tracking, 12 patients reported that the application prevented a phone call to the hospital and three patients reported prevention of an emergency room visit. PRO collection through this mobile device created an integrated platform for comprehensive perioperative care, patient-initiated outcome tracking with automatic reporting, and real-time feedback for process change. Improving proactive outpatient management of complex patients through mobile technology could help restructure health-care delivery and improve resource utilization for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Pickens
- Division ofHPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Allyson Cochran
- Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Carolinas Center for Surgical Outcomes Science, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Kendra Tezber
- Division ofHPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Renna Berry
- Information and Analytics Services, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; and
| | | | | | - Lacey King
- Division ofHPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - David A. Iannitti
- Division ofHPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - John B. Martinie
- Division ofHPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Erin H. Baker
- Division ofHPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Lee M. Ocuin
- Division ofHPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Jarrett Hunt
- Information and Analytics Services, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cibula D, Planchamp F, Fischerova D, Fotopoulou C, Kohler C, Landoni F, Mathevet P, Naik R, Ponce J, Raspagliesi F, Rodolakis A, Tamussino K, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zahl Eriksson AG, Querleu D. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:3-14. [PMID: 31900285 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer.To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice. METHODS Quality indicators were developed using a four-step evaluation process that included a systematic literature search to identify potential quality indicators, in-person meetings of an ad hoc group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large panel of European clinicians and patient representatives. RESULTS Fifteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were selected. Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are also detailed to define how the indicator will be measured in practice. Each indicator has a target which gives practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes. DISCUSSION Implementation of institutional quality assurance programs can improve quality of care, even in high-volume centers. This set of quality indicators from the European Society of Gynaecological Cancer may be a major instrument to improve the quality of surgical treatment of cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Daniela Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Christhardt Kohler
- Asklepios Hambourg Altona and Department of Gynecology, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Gynaecology, Universita degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Patrice Mathevet
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois Departement de gynecologie-obstetrique et genetique medicale, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raj Naik
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK
| | - Jordi Ponce
- University Hospital of Bellvitge (IDIBELL), LHospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | | | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athinon, Greece
| | | | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Clinical Research Unit, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mariano ER, Schatman ME. A Commonsense Patient-Centered Approach to Multimodal Analgesia Within Surgical Enhanced Recovery Protocols. J Pain Res 2019; 12:3461-3466. [PMID: 31920369 PMCID: PMC6935269 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s238772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Edward R Mariano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Michael E Schatman
- Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Adherence to Enhanced Recovery Protocols in NSQIP and Association With Colectomy Outcomes. Ann Surg 2019; 269:486-493. [PMID: 29064887 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of protocol adherence on length of stay (LOS) and recovery-specific outcomes after colectomy. BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) may decrease postoperative morbidity and LOS; however, the effect of overall protocol adherence remains unclear. METHODS Using American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy data (July 2014-December 2015) and 13 novel ERP variables, propensity scores were constructed for low (0-5), moderate (6-9), and high adherence (10-13 components). Prolonged LOS (>75th percentile, uncomplicated cases) was modeled with multivariable logistic regression with robust standard errors, adjusted for hospital-level clustering and propensity score. Secondary recovery-specific outcomes were modeled with negative binomial regression. Subgroup analysis was conducted on uncomplicated cases. RESULTS Among 8139 elective colectomies at 113 hospitals, LOS increased with decreasing adherence (4.3 days [SD 3.3] high adherence vs 7.8 [SD 6.8] low adherence; P < 0.0001). High adherence was associated with fewer complications, including postoperative ileus, compared with moderate (P < 0.0001) and low adherence (P < 0.0001). High-adherence patients achieved recovery milestones earlier (vs low adherence), with return of bowel function at 1.9 (vs 3.7) days, tolerance of diet at 2.4 (vs 5.4) days, and oral pain control at 2.7 (vs 5.0) days (P < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted odds of prolonged LOS were significantly increased for low (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 2.0-3.6) and moderate-adherence (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.1) groups. In a negative binomial regression, time to recovery was 60% to 95% longer for low versus high adherence (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In this large, multi-institutional North American data registry, high adherence to ERPs was associated with earlier recovery, decreased complications, and shorter LOS. ERPs can improve outcomes; however, benefits correlate with adherence.
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Hospital discharge after colorectal resection within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program occurs earlier compared to standard-care postoperative pathways but often later than what objective criteria of "readiness for discharge" could allow. The aim of this study was to analyse reasons and risk factors of such discharge delay. METHODS All elective patients admitted for colorectal resection at the regional Hospital of Lugano in 2014 and 2015 were included. The postoperative day on which patients fulfilled consensus agreed criteria (according to Fiore) for readiness for discharge (POD-F) and the effective day of discharge (POD-D) were determined. We analysed the reasons for discharge delay (POD-D>POD-F) and performed univariate and multivariate analysis to determine risk factors. RESULTS One hundred thirty-eight patients were included in the study. Median POD-F was 5 (2-48) days, POD-D was 6 (3-50) days. In 94 patients, POD-D occurred later than POD-F with a median delay of 1 (1-11) days. Reasons for discharge delay were insufficient social support in 13 (14%), patient's preference in 39 (41%) and medical team preference in 41 (44%). Private insurance (OR 2.61, 95%CI 1.08-6.34, p = 0.034) and patient discharged on a day other than Monday (OR 2.94, 95%CI 1.16-7.14, p = 0.023) were independent predictors for discharge delay. CONCLUSION Even when objective criteria for readiness for discharge have been fulfilled, patients and/or doctors often do not feel comfortable with hospital discharge at this time point. Length of stay, even within an ERAS program, is still influenced by several non-medical factors and is therefore not a precise surrogate marker of outcomes.
Collapse
|
43
|
Validity of the I-FEED score for postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:2219-2226. [PMID: 31363895 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07011-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative ileus (POI) is common after gastrointestinal surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and costs. However, POI is poorly defined. The I-FEED score is a novel outcome measure for POI, developed by expert consensus. It contains five elements (intake, response to nausea treatment, emesis, exam, and duration, each scored with 0, 1, or 3 points) and classifies patients into normal, postoperative gastrointestinal intolerance (POGI), and postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD). However, it has not yet been validated in a clinical context. The objective was to provide validity evidence for the I-FEED score to measure the construct of POI in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS Data previously collected from a clinical trial investigating the impact of different perioperative fluid management strategies on primary POI in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy (2013-2015) were analyzed. Patients were managed by a longstanding Enhanced Recovery program (expected length of stay (LOS): 3 days). Daily I-FEED scores were generated (normal 0-2, POGI 3-5, POGD 6+ points) up to hospital discharge or postoperative day 7. Validity was assessed by testing the hypotheses that I-FEED score was higher (1) in patients with longer time to GI3 (tolerating diet + flatus/bowel movement), (2) with longer LOS (> 3 days vs shorter), (3) in patients with complications vs without, (4) in patients with poorer recovery (measured by Quality of Recovery-9 questionnaire). RESULTS A total of 128 patients were included for analysis (mean age 61.7 years (SD 15.2), 57% male, 71% malignancy, and 39.1% rectal resection). Median LOS was 4 days [IQR3-5], and 32% experienced postoperative in-hospital morbidity. Overall, 48% of patients were categorized as normal, 22% POGI, and 30% POGD. The data supported all 4 hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS This study contributes preliminary validity evidence for the I-FEED score as a measure for POI after colorectal surgery.
Collapse
|
44
|
A mobile device application (app) to improve adherence to an enhanced recovery program for colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:742-751. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06823-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
45
|
Jamel S, Tukanova K, Markar SR. The evolution of fast track protocols after oesophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:S675-S684. [PMID: 31080644 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Fast track is a standardised goal directed patient's care pathway that aims to facilitate recovery following surgery. Currently, there are large variations in the fast track protocols used in oesophagectomy due to the complexity of the procedure. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the evolution of fast track protocols following oesophagectomy since its implementation and the resulting effect on postoperative outcomes. Relevant electronic databases were searched for studies assessing the clinical outcome from fast track in oesophagectomy and also those assessing the effects of the individual key components in fast track protocols. The search yielded twenty-three publications regarding fast track implementation in oesophagectomy. A pattern of consistent evolution in fast-track protocols was clearly demonstrated and these have shown variations in the core-identified components across the studies. However, evolution in fast track protocols over time showed, an overall improvement in length of stay, anastomotic leak, pulmonary complications and mortality over time. Thirty publications were included that evaluated specific components of fast track protocols, with an increasing trend towards addressing the nutritional aspect in oesophagectomy care in more recent years. The variations in the key components of fast track protocol of care identify the need for continued assessment and identification for areas of improvement. In the future incremental gains through focused improvements in key components will lend itself to even better postoperative outcomes and patient experience during oesophageal cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Jamel
- Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Karina Tukanova
- Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lohsiriwat V. Learning curve of enhanced recovery after surgery program in open colorectal surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 11:169-178. [PMID: 31057701 PMCID: PMC6478598 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i3.169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) reduces hospitalization and complication following colorectal surgery. Whether the experience of multidisciplinary ERAS team affects patients’ outcomes is unknown.
AIM To evaluate and establish a learning curve of ERAS program for open colorectal surgery.
METHODS This was a review of prospectively collected database of 380 “unselected” patients undergoing elective “open” colectomy and/or proctectomy under ERAS protocol from 2011 (commencing ERAS application) to 2017 in a university hospital. Patients were divided into 5 chronological groups (76 cases per quintile). Surgical outcomes and ERAS compliance among quintiles were compared. Learning curves were calculated based on criteria of optimal recovery: defined as absence of major postoperative complications, discharge by postoperative day 5, and no 30-d readmission.
RESULTS Hospitalization more than 5 d occurred in 22.6% (n = 86), major complication was present in 2.9% (n = 11) and 30-d readmission rate was 2.4% (n = 9) accounting for unsuccessful recovery of 25% (n = 95). Conversely, the overall rate of optimal recovery was 75%. The optimal recovery significantly increased from 57.9% in 1st quintile to 72.4%-85.5% in the following quintiles (P < 0.001). Average compliance with ERAS protocol gradually increased over the time - from 68.6% in 1st quintile to 75.5% in 5th quintile (P < 0.001). The application of preoperative counseling, nutrition support, goal-directed fluid therapy, O-ring wound protector and scheduled mobilization significantly increased over the study period.
CONCLUSION A number of 76 colorectal operations are required for a multidisciplinary team to achieve a significantly higher rate of optimal recovery and high compliance with ERAS program for open colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varut Lohsiriwat
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Construct Validity and Responsiveness of the Abdominal Surgery Impact Scale in the Context of Recovery After Colorectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62:309-317. [PMID: 30489323 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Abdominal Surgery Impact Scale is a patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates quality of life after abdominal surgery. Evidence supporting its measurement properties is limited. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to contribute evidence for the construct validity and responsiveness of the Abdominal Surgery Impact Scale as a measure of recovery after colorectal surgery in the context of an enhanced recovery pathway. DESIGN This is an observational validation study designed according to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist. SETTING This study was conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. PATIENTS Included were 100 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery (mean age, 65; 57% male). INTERVENTION There were no interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Construct validity was assessed at 2 days and 2 and 4 weeks after surgery by testing the hypotheses that Abdominal Surgery Impact Scale scores were higher 1) in patients without vs with postoperative complications, 2) with higher preoperative physical status vs lower, 3) without vs with postoperative stoma, 4) in men vs women, 5) with shorter time to readiness for discharge (≤4 days) vs longer, and 6) with shorter length of stay (≤4 days) vs longer. To test responsiveness, we hypothesized that scores would be higher 1) preoperatively vs 2 days postoperatively, 2) at 2 weeks vs 2 days postoperatively, and 3) at 4 weeks vs 2 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS The data supported 3 of the 6 hypotheses (hypotheses 1, 5, and 6) tested for construct validity at all time points. Two of the 3 hypotheses tested for responsiveness (hypotheses 1 and 2) were supported. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by the risk of selection bias due to the use of secondary data from a randomized controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS The Abdominal Surgery Impact Scale was responsive to the expected trajectory of recovery up to 2 weeks after surgery, but did not discriminate between all groups expected to have different recovery trajectories. There remains a need for the development of recovery-specific, patient-reported outcome measures with adequate measurement properties. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A814.
Collapse
|
48
|
Pecorelli N, Balvardi S, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F, Feldman LS, Fiore JF. Does adherence to perioperative enhanced recovery pathway elements influence patient-reported recovery following colorectal resection? Surg Endosc 2019; 33:3806-3815. [PMID: 30701367 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06684-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are pivotal to promote patient-centered perioperative care. Adherence to enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) is associated with improved clinical outcomes (i.e., morbidity, length of stay), but the impact of adherence on PROMs is uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent to which adherence to an ERP for colorectal surgery is associated with postoperative recovery as assessed using PROMs. METHODS AND PROCEDURES 100 patients were included [median age 63 (IQR 50-71) years, 81 laparoscopic, 37 rectal surgery]. Overall adherence to the ERP and adherence to specific ERP elements were analyzed. Adjusted linear regression was used to evaluate the association of adherence with PROMs assessing early recovery [Abdominal surgery impact scale (ASIS) and Multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) on POD2] and late recovery (Duke Activity Status Index, RAND-36 Physical and Mental Summary Scores, Life-Space Mobility Assessment at 4 weeks after surgery). Missing data were addressed using multiple imputations. RESULTS Median adherence to the ERP was 80% (16/20 elements, IQR 70-90%). Overall adherence was associated with ASIS scores on POD2 (4% increase per additional element, 95% CI 1-8%; p = 0.018). When specific ERP elements were analyzed, ASIS scores were associated with adherence to PONV prophylaxis (34% increase, 95% CI 5-63%; p = 0.023) and early solid food diet (20% increase, 95% CI 5-35%; p = 0.009). MFI General fatigue and MFI Mental fatigue scores on POD2 were associated with adherence to PONV prophylaxis (36% decrease, 95% CI - 64 to - 8%, p = 0.014 and 22% decrease, 95% CI - 44 to - 8%, p = 0.042). Overall adherence and adherence to specific elements were not associated with PROMs at 4 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that, from the perspective of patients, adherence to an ERP for colorectal surgery impacts early, but not late postoperative recovery. This result may reflect the lack of PROMs able to validly measure postoperative recovery beyond hospital discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Pecorelli
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, E19-125, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.,Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Saba Balvardi
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, E19-125, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - A Sender Liberman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patrick Charlebois
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Barry Stein
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Franco Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, E19-125, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julio F Fiore
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, E19-125, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Eriksen JR, Munk-Madsen P, Kehlet H, Gögenur I. Orthostatic intolerance in enhanced recovery laparoscopic colorectal resection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2019; 63:171-177. [PMID: 30094811 DOI: 10.1111/aas.13238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Orthostatic hypotension (OH) and intolerance (OI) are common findings in the early postoperative period after major surgery and may delay early mobilization. The mechanism of impaired orthostatic competence and OI symptoms is not fully understood, and specific data after colorectal surgery with well-defined perioperative care regimens and mobilization protocols are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, possible risk factors and the impact of OI in patients undergoing elective minimal invasive colorectal cancer resection. METHODS A prospective single-centre study with an optimal enhanced recovery program and multimodal analgesic treatment. OI and OH were evaluated using a well-defined mobilization protocol preoperatively and 6 hour and 24 hour postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 100 patients were included in the data analysis. The overall median length of stay was 3 days (1-38). OI was observed in 53% of the patients 6 hour postoperatively and in 24% at 24 hour. OI at 6 hour postoperatively was associated with younger age, lower BMI, and female gender. At 24 hour postoperatively, female gender and ASA class >1 was associated with OI. Opioid consumption and intravenous fluid during the first 24 hour was not associated with OI. Postoperative complications were equally observed between patients with and without OI. Although not statistically significant, patients with OI at 24 hour postoperatively had prolonged LOS (mean 4.0 vs 7.5 days, P = 0.069) compared with patients without OI. CONCLUSION Postoperative orthostatic intolerance is a common problem during the first 24 hour following laparoscopic colorectal resection and may be followed by delayed recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens R. Eriksen
- Department of Surgery; Colorectal Cancer Unit; Zealand University Hospital; Roskilde Denmark
| | - Pia Munk-Madsen
- Department of Surgery; Colorectal Cancer Unit; Zealand University Hospital; Roskilde Denmark
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Section for Surgical Pathophysiology; Rigshospitalet; University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Ismail Gögenur
- Department of Surgery; Colorectal Cancer Unit; Zealand University Hospital; Roskilde Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
|