Laparo-endoscopic versus open recurrent inguinal hernia repair: should we follow the guidelines?

A new groin hernia classification with clinical relevance

INTRODUCTION

Groin hernia is one of the most commonly managed surgical diseases around the world. The typical question asked by patients is "Does my hernia require urgent surgery?". The currently available classifications are insufficient to stratify patients into different groups. We propose a new classification that incorporates diverse clinical elements together with anatomical and other vital information, which allows us to stratify patients into different groups.

METHOD

A task force was formed by the Hong Kong Hernia Society, working with international expert hernia surgeons. The framework of the classification system was formulated. Clinical elements that are important in groin disease stratification were identified. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed. Those which dictate the severity of the disease were selected and compiled to form the new proposed classification. Application of this classification model to a single hernia surgeon's registry in The Hong Kong Adventist Hospital Hernia Centre was done for initial evaluation.

RESULT

This new classification incorporates important clinical characteristics forming a total of nine grades of differentiation, together with the anatomical details and special information. This comprehensive system allows the stratification of patients into different groups based on disease severity. It also enables more accurate data collection for future audits, comparisons of disease progression over time, and the effect of different management strategies for different-stage patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first classification system which incorporates essential clinical parameters, which allows the stratification of groin hernia into different stages. Further studies and validation should be performed to evaluate the usefulness and value of this classification in groin hernia management.

Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair for a Recurrent Inguinal Hernia After Kugel Hernioplasty Using the Pseudosac of Direct Inguinal Hernia: A Case Report

Here, we report a case of laparoscopic trans-inguinal hernia repair (transabdominal preperitoneal repair or TAPP) for a recurrent inguinal hernia following direct Kugel surgery. A 71-year-old man underwent direct Kugel hernioplasty for a right inguinal hernia at another hospital 4 years prior to presentation. The patient subsequently underwent laparoscopic surgery using the TAPP technique, during which the abdominal cavity was visualized with a laparoscope, revealing a tubular mesh protruding towards the abdominal cavity with a direct and indirect hernia ring. Three months post-surgery, no recurrence was observed.

Comparative analysis of different surgical approaches for recurrent inguinal hernia: a single-center observational study

Purpose

Managing recurrent inguinal hernias is complex, and choosing the right surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open) is vital for patient outcomes. This study compared the outcomes of using the same vs. different surgical approaches for initial and subsequent hernia repairs.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent recurrent inguinal hernia repair at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between January 2014 and May 2023. Patients were divided into the "concordant" and "discordant" groups, comprising patients who underwent same and different approaches in both surgeries, respectively. Preoperative baseline characteristics, index surgery data, postoperative outcomes, and recurrence rates were analyzed and compared.

Results

In total, 131 patients were enrolled; the concordant and discordant groups comprised 31 (open, n = 19; laparoscopic, n = 12) and 100 patients (open to laparoscopic, n = 68; laparoscopic to open, n = 32), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the mean operation time (50.5 ± 21.7 minutes vs. 50.2 ± 20.0 minutes, P = 0.979), complication rates (6.5% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.356), or 36-month cumulative recurrence rates (9.8% vs. 9.8%; P = 0.865). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the discordant than in the concordant group (1.8 ± 0.7 vs. 1.4 ± 0.6, P = 0.003).

Conclusion

Most recurrent inguinal hernia repairs were performed using the discordant surgical approach. Overall, concordance in the surgical approach did not significantly affect postoperative outcomes. Therefore, the selection of the surgical approach based on the patient's condition and surgeon's preference may be advisable.

Elective Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Repair: Value of an Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of an abdominal wall surgery unit on postoperative complications (within 90 days postoperatively), hernia recurrence and chronic postoperative inguinal pain after elective recurrent inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients who underwent elective recurrent inguinal hernia repair between January 2010 and October 2021. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the group of patients operated on in the abdominal wall surgery unit and the group of patients operated on by other units not specialized in abdominal wall surgery. A logistic regression model was performed for hernia recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients underwent elective surgery for recurrent inguinal hernia during the study period. The patients in the abdominal wall surgery group were younger (P ≤ 0.001) and had fewer comorbidities (P ≤ 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in terms of complications. The patients in the abdominal wall surgery group presented fewer recurrences (15% vs. 3%; P = 0.001). Surgery performed by the abdominal wall surgery unit was related to fewer recurrences in the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.123; 95% CI = 0.21-0.725; P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Specialization in abdominal wall surgery seems to have a positive impact in terms of recurrence in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. The influence of comorbidities or type of surgery (i.e., outpatient surgery) require further study.

Trend of minimally invasive and open surgery experience of general surgery residents: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education general surgery case log in Thailand

Purpose

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers patients several benefits, such as smaller incisions, and fast recovery times. General surgery residents should be trained in both open and MIS. We aimed to examine the trends of minimally invasive and open procedures performed by general surgery residents in Thailand.

Methods

A retrospective review of the Royal College of Surgeons of Thailand and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education general surgery case logs from 2007 to 2018 was performed for common open and laparoscopic general surgery operations. The data were grouped by three time periods, which were 2007-2010, 2011-2014, and 2015-2018, and analyzed to explore changes in the operative trends.

Results

For Thai residents, the mean number of laparoscopic operations per person per year increased from 5.97 to 9.36 (56.78% increase) and open increased from 20.02 to 27.16 (35.67% increase). There was a significant increase in the average number of minimally invasive procedures performed among cholecystectomy (5.83, 6.57, 8.10; p < 0.001) and inguinal hernia repair (0.33, 0.35, 0.66; p < 0.001). Compared to general surgery residents in the United States, Thai residents had more experience with open appendectomy, but significantly less experience with all other operations/procedures.

Conclusion

The number of open and minimally invasive procedures performed or assisted by Thai general surgery residents has slowly increased, but generally lags behind residents in the United States. The Thai education program must be updated to improve residents' technical skills in open and laparoscopic surgery to remain competitive with their global partners.

Indications and Outcomes of a Hybrid Method Combining Laparoscopic and Anterior Approaches for Inguinal Hernia Repair

Introduction

Surgery for complex inguinal hernia (IH) (recurrent IH or IH after radical prostatectomy (RP)) may be difficult because of the presumed scar or adhesion in the retropubic space. A hybrid method combining the laparoscopic and anterior approaches (HLAA) in a bidirectional surgical technique may be an option in complex IH cases.

Methods

Patients at our institution who underwent IH repair for complex IH using HLAA from April 2018 to November 2019 were included. We retrospectively evaluated the patient characteristics, IH diagnosis, intraoperative variables, complications, and hernia recurrence during the follow-up period.

Results

Twenty patients were involved in this study. Seven patients underwent hLAA for recurrent IH, whereas the remaining 13 underwent hLAA for IH after RP. Five patients had bilateral IH, all of whom had IH after RP. The type of IH was lateral in 21 patients, medial in six patients, and lateral and medial in two patients. Hernia repair was performed using a patch alone in two patients and a plug and patch in 18 patients. Seroma or hematoma was observed in five patients, and one patient experienced chronic pain. No hernia recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 24 months.

Conclusion

hLAA could facilitate precise diagnosis and intraoperative confirmation of repair for recurrent IH and IH after RP. The intraoperative findings and the cause of recurrence can be easily shared among surgeons in hLAA. Further investigations are necessary to determine the long-term efficacy of hLAA in a larger cohort.

Risk Factors for Conversion in Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernioplasty

BACKGROUND

Conversion is a surgical concern because the surgical technique can change during surgery. Surprisingly, there is no study in the literature on the causes and risk factors leading to conversion in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal repair (TEP). There is also no consensus on the prevention and causes of this condition in TEP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors underlying the development of conversion during TEP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We recruited 962 consecutive patients who underwent TEP between May 2016 and May 2021. All data were collected retrospectively. The outcomes of patients who converted to open surgery were compared with those without conversion. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for conversion.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of conversion was 4.05% (n=39). The median age was 42 years (18 to 83) and body mass index was 25.2 kg/m2 (15.67 to 32.9). Significant clinical factors associated with conversion included old age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, large peritoneal tear (PT), Charlson comorbidity index, previous surgery, large hernial defects, presence of scrotal hernia, and the defect size of inguinal hernia. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for conversion: large hernial defect, large PT, previous lower abdominal surgery, previous hernia surgery, and scrotal hernia.

CONCLUSION

Conversion is a minor complication seen during TEP and its incidence varies depending on many factors. Previous lower abdominal surgery and a large PT carries a 6-fold increased risk for conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery during TEP.

Pre-operative factors associated with short- and long-term outcomes in the patient with inguinal hernia: What does the current evidence say?

Hernia repair is one of the most frequent interventions in surgery worldwide. The approach to abdominal wall and inguinal hernias remains a challenge due to emerging evidence on aspects such as timely diagnosis, use of innovative techniques or post-surgical care. However, pre-operative preparation is also a factor that substantially affects the absolute success rate of this type of condition. Time management between diagnosis and intervention, control of diseases that increase intra-abdominal pressure, weight and nutritional status, are some of the many elements to be considered in this type of patients before surgery. Considering that this condition carries high health care costs, especially in case of recurrence, has a risk of complications and affects the individual's functional capacity, the objective of this review is to synthesize evidence on the role of these factors on the short- and long-term outcome of inguinal hernia management, and to make suggestions on the general approach to this type of patients.

Adding Laparoscopic Iliopubic Tract Repair to Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Treatment of Recurrent Inguinal Hernia After Totally Extraperitoneal Hernioplasty

Background: In patients with recurrent inguinal hernia (IH) after totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty, re-TEP hernioplasty is difficult because of fibrotic adhesions. Re-laparoscopic hernioplasty is possible by changing the approach from extraperitoneal to transabdominal. If iliopubic tract repair (IPTR), mainly used in the past for the open approach, is added as a laparoscopic procedure, re-laparoscopic hernioplasty is possible when treating recurrent IH. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of alternate transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty supplemented by IPTR for treating recurrent IH after TEP hernioplasty. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 2600 patients with IHs who underwent TAPP hernioplasty from January 2015 to December 2020. Among patients with recurrent IH, those who underwent primary TEP were included in the study. For reoperation, TAPP hernioplasty was performed and IPTR was added. IPTR was performed by suture closure of the internal inguinal ring by the iliopubic tract and medial aponeurotic arch of the transversus abdominis muscle. Results: Of the 35 patients (33 males and 2 females) with recurrent IH after primary TEP hernioplasty, 51% (18/35) of patients had recurrence within 2 years of the first operation. There were 28 recurrent IHs of the same type as the original, and 7 cases of a different type. The mean TAPP operation time was 41 minutes. Chronic inguinodynia and re-recurrence was not observed. One patient had inferior epigastric vessel injury, which was successfully repaired. Conclusion: Adding laparoscopic IPTR to TAPP hernioplasty is safe feasible treatment for recurrent IH after TEP hernioplasty.

Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair

OBJECTIVE

to describe the use of the robotic platform in inguinal hernia recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair.

METHODS

patients with recurrent inguinal hernias following a laparoscopic repair who have undergone robotic transabdominal preperitoneal between December 2015 through September 2020 were identified in a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes of interest included demographics, hernia characteristics, operative details and rates of 30-day surgical site occurrence, surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions, surgical site infection and hernia recurrence were abstracted.

RESULTS

nineteen patients (95% male, mean age 55 years, mean body mass index 28) had 27 hernias repaired (N=8 bilateral). Average operative time was 168.9 ± 49.3min (range 90-240). There were two intraoperative complications all of them were bleeding from the inferior epigastric vessel injuries. Three SSOs occurred (N=2 seromas and N=1 hematoma. After a median 35.7 months follow-up (IQR 13-49), no recurrence has been diagnosed. One patient developed chronic postoperative inguinal pain.

CONCLUSIONS

on a small number of selected patients and experienced hands, we found that the use of the robotic platform for repair of recurrent hernias after prior laparoscopic repair appears to be feasible, safe and effective despite being technically demanding. Further studies in larger cohorts are necessary to determine if this technique provides any benefits in recurrent inguinal hernia scenario.

[Evidence-based medicine of gallstone disease regarding development of national clinical guidelines]

OBJECTIVE

To study the Cochrane evidence base of systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding development of national guidelines for surgical treatment of gallstone disease and its complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the original database involving 35 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of Cochrane Library devoted to gallstone disease and its complications. Methodology of electronic and manual searching of trials was used for identification and screening of information for the period until October 2021.

RESULTS

There were 430 randomized controlled trials from different countries estimated in 35 systematic reviews of Cochrane Library. At the same time, Russian-language researches are not included in the world's evidence database of biliary tract surgery. Expert groups couldn't perform meta-analysis and limited to systematic-review in 6 (17%) publications because of insufficient statistical power or primary researches. Need for further research of this issue was determined after assessment of 26 (74%) meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION

We have to convey foreign experience as subbase of national clinical guidelines taking into account deficiency of scientific trials with high level of evidence in our country. Need for further evidence trials, considering the peculiarities of surgical care in the Russian Federation, is determined by unsolved issues of treatment of gallstone disease and its complications.

A multi-center study on recurrent inguinal hernias: assessment of surgeons' compliance to guideline-based repair and evaluation of short-term outcomes

INTRODUCTION

As patients with recurrent inguinal hernia (RIH) are at a higher risk of perioperative complications, international guidelines have been developed to mitigate these risks by recommending the reverse approach for repair. We aim to study the characteristics of RIH, compliance to guidelines-based repair (GR) and determine factors influencing compliance to guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with RIH was carried out at two tertiary institutions in Singapore, over 10 years from January 2010 to 2020.

RESULTS

There were 16 patients with bilateral recurrences and 214 patients with unilateral recurrences. The characteristics of patients with non-guidelines-based repair (NGR) versus GR were similar, p > 0.05. GR was performed for 128 (52.1%) hernias as compared to NGR for 118 (47.9%) hernias. The open approach was more common in NGR than GR, 115/118 (89.8%) versus 58/128 (45.3%), p < 0.001. Forty (n = 40, 16.3%) RIH presented emergently, of which 37 underwent NGR while 3 underwent GR, p < 0.0001. More consultants were present during GR 103/128 (80.5%) as compared to NGR 78/118 (66.1%), p = 0.018. Emergency presentation of hernia recurrence, OR 7.74 (CI 6.11-9.20), p = 0.005, and open repair during the index repair were significantly associated with NGR, OR 6.63 (CI 4.42-8.84), p = 0.01. Median length of stay was shorter in the GR 1 day (IQR 1-2 days) versus 2 days (IQR 2-5 days) in the NGR group, p = 0.02.

CONCLUSION

The compliance rate of GR for RIH is 52%. NGR for RIH had acceptable short-term outcomes. For elective presentation of RIH, GR should be encouraged given a shorter length of hospital stay.

Inguinal hernia repair in Spain. A population-based study of 263,283 patients: factors associated with the choice of laparoscopic approach

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (IHR) rate in Spain and identify the factors associated with the choice of this surgical approach.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 263,283 patients who underwent IHR from January 2016 to December 2018 was conducted. Data were extracted from the Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) of the Health Ministry database. The primary outcome was laparoscopic (LAP) rate utilization. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with LAP-IHR.

RESULTS

Only 5.7% (15,059) patients underwent LAP-IHR, whereas the remnant 94.3% (248,224 patients) underwent open repair. High variability in the LAP-IHR rate across the country was observed; ranged between provinces from 0 to 19.7%, for a unilateral hernia, and between 0 to 57.4% in the case of bilateral hernias. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the patient place of residence was the most remarkable factor associated with the likelihood of receiving LAP-IHR (OR 4.96; p < 0.001). There were also significant differences favoring LAP-IHR for bilateral operation (OR 4.596; p < 0.001), insurance coverage (OR 4.439, p < 0.001) and self-pay patients (OR 2.317; p < 0.001), as well as a recurrent hernia (OR 1.780; p < 0.001), age younger than 65 years (OR 1.555; p < 0.001) and male sex (OR 1.162, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LAP-IHR remains a not frequent choice among surgeons in Spain, even when dealing with recurrent and bilateral hernias. The results suggest that the choice of LAP-IHR could depend on the surgeon's preference rather than on the indication appropriateness.

Laparoscopic treatment (reTAPP) for recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

For inguinal hernia recurrences, the European Hernia Society guidelines recommend laparo-endoscopic repair (LR) following a previous open surgery (OS) and, conversely, OS following previous laparo-endoscopic repair. Laparoscopic treatment of recurrences after previous LR is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and reliability of a repeated transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic repair (reTAPP) for a recurrent hernia.

METHODS

We analyzed and compared a series of patients with recurrent inguinal hernia after LR who underwent repair by a conventional approach with similar patients who underwent reTAPP between January 2010 and December 2018.

RESULTS

Between January 2010 and December 2018, 2488 transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia (TAPP) repairs were performed. Recurrence was observed in 46 (1.8%). Of these patients, 18 (39%; Group 1; G1) underwent conventional open repair (Lichtenstein technique) and 28 (61%; Group 2; G2) reTAPP. In G2, repair was successful in 24 patients (86%); however, four cases (14%) needed conversion to OS because of technical difficulties. Two patients re-recurred (4.3%), one in G1 which was resolved in a third approach with a reTAPP and the other in G2 which was resolved with OS.

CONCLUSION

ReTAPP surgery for recurrences after previous TAPP repair proved to be safe and was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay and morbidity and recurrence rates comparable to OS at a highly specialized center. Randomized studies with a larger number of cases are necessary to confirm these findings and draw more robust and objective conclusions.

[Diagnostic and treatment approaches for acute appendicitis in the Russian Federation. Results of the all-Russian survey]

OBJECTIVE

To improve treatment outcomes in patients with acute appendicitis (AA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An internet survey was performed. Questionnaire consisted of 15 questions concerning diagnosis and treatment of AA: application of prognostic scales, incidence and technical aspects of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative management, compliance with international and national clinical guidelines. A total of 690 questionnaires were received and analyzed (3.67% of all surgeons in the Russian Federation).

RESULTS

Eighteen percent of respondents use at least one prognostic scale. The vast majority of surgeons (92%) use antibiotic prophylaxis. Almost half of respondents place trocars in the triangulation position (44%), one third of surgeons ligate the mesentery of the appendix (35%), most respondents perform mesoappendectomy (60%) with monopolar and bipolar cautery. Forty-five percent of all respondents do not invert the appendix stump. Significant number of respondents use abdominal drainage routinely. Only 3.5% of surgeons use multimodal postoperative analgesia. Less than 22% of patients are operated under low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Standardization of surgical technique and perioperative approaches including those specified in the guidelines is absent. We also found insufficient awareness of surgeons about international and national clinical guidelines.

CONCLUSION

This study may be useful for standardizing treatment approaches, choosing the best practice, popularizing and improving of current clinical guidelines.

What is the outcome of re-recurrent vs recurrent inguinal hernia repairs? An analysis of 16,206 patients from the Herniamed Registry

INTRODUCTION

The proportion of recurrent repairs in the total collective of inguinal hernia repairs among men is 11.3-14.3% and among women 7.0-7.4%. The rate of re-recurrences is reported to be 2.9-9.2%. To date, no case series has been published on second and ≥ third recurrences and their treatment outcomes. Only case reports are available.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In an analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry the perioperative and 1-year follow-up outcomes of 16,206 distinct patients who had undergone first recurrent (n = 14,172; 87.4%), second recurrent (n = 1,583; 9.8%) or ≥ third recurrent (n = 451; 2.8%) inguinal hernia repair between September 1, 2009 and July 1, 2017 were compared.

RESULTS

The intraoperative complication rate for all recurrent repairs was between 1-2%. In the postoperative complications a continuous increase was observed (first recurrence: 3.97% vs second recurrence: 5.75% vs ≥ third recurrence 8.65%; p < 0.001). That applied equally to the complication-related reoperation rates (first recurrence: 1.50% vs second recurrence: 2.21% vs ≥ third recurrence 2.66; p = 0.020). Likewise, the re-recurrence rate rose significantly (first recurrence: 1.95% vs second recurrence: 2.72% vs ≥ third recurrence 3.77; p = 0.005). Similarly, the rate of pain requiring treatment rose highly significantly with an increasing number of recurrences (first recurrence: 5.21% vs second recurrence: 6.70% vs ≥ third recurrence 10.86; p = < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The repair of re-recurrences in inguinal hernia is associated with increasingly more unfavorable outcomes. For the first recurrence the guidelines should definitely be noted. For a second and ≥ third recurrence diagnostic laparoscopy may help to select the best possible surgical technique.

Comparing large pore lightweight mesh versus small pore heavyweight mesh in open mesh plug repair of primary and recurrent unilateral inguinal hernia - A questionnaire study for a retrospective analysis of a cohort of elective groin hernia patients using propensity score matching

PURPOSE

For surgical treatment of inguinal hernia, large-pore, lightweight mesh has been shown to offer advantages over small-pore, heavyweight options in terms of chronic post-operative inguinal pain, but without the disadvantage of having to deal with an increased recurrence rate. Limited data are available for the mesh plug repair technique. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to compare large-pore, lightweight mesh versus small-pore, heavyweight mesh for mesh plug repair with regard to chronic pain and recurrences in elective primary unilateral hernias. In addition, we report our experience in repairing recurrent hernias.

METHODS

Using a modified version of the questionnaire from the Danish Hernia Registry, two groups were surveyed: elective primary unilateral hernias and recurrent unilateral hernias. In both groups small-pore, heavyweight mesh (HWM) and lightweight, large-pore mesh (LWM) were compared with respect to chronic pain and recurrences. Propensity score matching (PS) was carried out on a pool of 1,782 patients. Effect sizes were assessed by using Cohen's d and Cramer's V.

RESULTS

If the questionnaire item 'lump/swelling' is considered as a surrogate for recurrence (clinically verified in our study), the results in primary hernias after HWM show a 6.0% recurrence rate and 7.3% after LWM (p = 0.487) with a mean follow up of 31,3 months in HWM and 29,2 months in LWM respectively. The questionnaire item 'pain impacting on work/leisure activities' was answered with Yes in 11.5% following HWM and in 10.5% following LWM (p = 0.665). After the evaluation of the overall surgical results, we did not find differences. Comparing primary and recurrent hernia repair we found below small effect size differences with respect to the items of the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LWM in repairing elective unilateral primary hernias by the mesh plug technique does not result in less chronic pain and more recurrences when compared with HWM. Recurrent hernias repaired by the mesh plug technique may have same outcomes like in primary hernia repair when considering the magnitude of effect sizes.

Clinical value of the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique in recurrent inguinal hernia repair

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical value of the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique in recurrent inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

The clinical data of 354 patients with recurrent inguinal hernia who underwent TAPP surgery from June 2010 to June 2016 at the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic surgery was successfully completed in all 360 patients. Among them TAPP were finished in 354 patients, while TAPP repair were attempted but finally converted to open or TAPE repair in 6 patients. The mean operation time was 54.7 ± 19.4 min (range 30-90 min), mean duration of hospitalization was 4.7 ± 2.1 days (range 2-14 days), and mean duration of follow-up was 37.7 ± 12.4 months (range 12-60 months). The rate of intraoperative injury was 4.5% (16/354), and the rate of postoperative complications was 13.6% (48/354). No patient developed a foreign body sensation, wound infection, intestinal obstruction, mesh infection, or chronic pain. Two patients (0.6%) developed re-recurrence requiring reoperation, with no further recurrence.

CONCLUSION

When performed by an experienced surgeon with excellent technique, the TAPP technique is safe and effective for recurrent hernia after surgical treatment via the anterior repair, and maybe a good alternative for recurrent hernia after surgical treatment via the posterior repair.

Chronic pain after two laparoendoscopic inguinal hernia repairs compared with laparoendoscopic repair followed by the Lichtenstein repair: an international questionnaire study

BACKGROUND

The best repair of a recurrent inguinal hernia after primary laparoendoscopic repair is debatable. The aim was to assess chronic pain after two laparoendoscopic repairs in the same groin compared with Lichtenstein reoperation preceded by a laparoendoscopic repair.

METHODS

This cohort study included adult patients who had received two laparoendoscopic repairs (Lap-Lap) or a laparoendoscopic repair followed by the Lichtenstein repair (Lap-Lich). Eligible patients were identified in the Danish and the Swedish hernia databases. Lap-Lap was matched 1:3 with Lap-Lich, and patients were sent validated questionnaires. The primary outcome was the proportion with chronic pain-related functional impairment, compared between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included chronic pain during various activities.

RESULTS

In total, 74% (546 patients) responded to the questionnaires with a median follow-up since the second repair of 4.9 years (0.9-21.9 years). Regarding the primary outcome, 21% in Lap-Lap and Lap-Lich had chronic pain-related functional impairment of daily activities (p = 0.94). More patients in Lap-Lap compared with Lap-Lich reported pain ≥ 20 mm measured by the visual analog scale, 11% versus 5%, p = 0.04. However, there was no difference in the median VAS score or in the vast majority of the remaining secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no overall difference in chronic pain between patients who had received Lap-Lap compared with Lap-Lich. Choice of operative strategy for the second repair should, therefore, not be based on risk of chronic pain.

[HerniaSurge: international guidelines on treatment of inguinal hernia in adults : Comments of the Surgical Working Group Hernia (CAH/DGAV) and the German Hernia Society (DHG) on the most important recommendations]

SURGICAL TECHNIQUES

The HerniaSurge guidelines have the highest evidence with respect to a strong recommendation for mesh-based surgical techniques. This evidence is equally valid for the Lichtenstein procedure as for the minimally invasive procedures TEP/TAPP. In the case of discrete symptomatic or asymptomatic inguinal hernias, watchful waiting can be an option, taking into account health status and social circumstances. Femoral hernias, on the other hand, should be treated promptly with mesh insertion. Also favored are laparoendoscopic techniques. The Shouldice repair achieves the least recurrences from the suturing procedures and may be an acceptable alternative when indicated or when the patient does not desire mesh reinforcement. In this case, a detailed patient education is necessary.

MESH CHOICE

The complication potential of plastic meshes should be explained. The weight is no longer considered a suitable parameter for the classification of meshes and is no longer recommended for mesh selection. Large pore (>1-1.5 mm) monofilament implants have the best integration potential and should have a tear strength of approximately 16 Nm². Traumatic mesh fixation is only recommended for large medial hernias (M3-EHS). Primarily not recommended are Plug & Patch, double-layered plastic implants (such as the PHS system) or other three-dimensional devices, as this could affect both the anterior and posterior planar layers and complicate the complementary surgical technique in the event of recurrence. In addition, the higher costs have to be considered.

PERIOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE ASPECTS

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in open repair procedures is recommended only in patients with an increased risk of infections. In laparoendoscopic procedures, antibiotic prophylaxis should not be performed or used with the utmost restraint. Careful preparation reduces chronic inguinal and testicular pain. In the case of interference of mesh and nerve, the nerve can be resected. A return to daily activity is recommended within 3-5 days.

QUALITY ASSURANCE

The documentation of patient data should be done by establishing hernia registers for quality assurance and for the development of further treatment options. The implementation of the guidelines is supported by HerniaSurge.

Accreditation and certification requirements for hernia centers and surgeons: the ACCESS project

INTRODUCTION

There is a need for hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons because of the increasing complexity of hernia surgery procedures due to new techniques, more difficult cases and a tailored approach with an increasing public awareness demanding optimal treatment results. Therefore, the requirements for accredited/certified hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons should be formulated by the international and national hernia societies, while taking account of the respective health care systems.

METHODS

The European Hernia Society (EHS) has appointed a working group composed of 18 hernia experts from all regions of Europe (ACCESS Group-Hernia Accreditation and Certification of Centers and Surgeons-Working Group) to formulate scientifically based requirements for hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons while taking into consideration different health care systems. A consensus was reached on the key questions by means of a meeting, a telephone conference and the exchange of contributions. The requirements formulated below were deemed implementable by all participating hernia experts in their respective countries.

RESULTS

The ACCESS Group suggests for an adequately equipped hernia center the following requirements: (a) to be accredited/certified by a national or international hernia society, (b) to perform a higher case volume in all types of hernia surgery compared to an average general surgery department in their country, (c) to be staffed by experienced hernia surgeons who are beyond the learning curve for all types of hernia surgery recommended in the guidelines and are responsible for education and training of hernia surgery in their department, (d) to treat hernia patients according to the current guidelines and scientific recommendations, (e) to document each case prospectively in a registry or quality assurance database (f) to perform follow-up for comparison of their own results with benchmark data for continuous improvement of their treatment results and ensuring contribution to research in hernia treatment. To become a specialist hernia surgeon, the ACCESS Group suggests a general surgeon to master the learning curve of all open and laparo-endoscopic hernia procedures recommended in the guidelines, perform a high caseload and additionally to implement and fulfill the other requirements for a hernia center.

CONCLUSION

Based on the above requirements formulated by the European Hernia Society for accredited/certified hernia centers and hernia specialist surgeons, the national and international hernia societies can now develop their own programs, while taking account of their specific health care systems.

Hybrid method with explorative laparoscopy and anterior open approach for re-recurrent inguinal hernia

The new guidelines of the HerniaSurge group recommend that only an expert hernia surgeon should repair a re-recurrent inguinal hernia. We report the efficacy of the hybrid method with explorative laparoscopy and anterior open approach for re-recurrent inguinal hernia repair. A 61-year-old man underwent anterior open preperitoneal mesh repair for right inguinal direct hernia and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for recurrence. Two years after the second surgery, re-recurrent inguinal hernia was confirmed. We carried out explorative laparoscopy for the re-recurrent inguinal hernia, which revealed a re-recurrent hernia orifice. We performed the anterior open approach while observing from the abdominal cavity. Explorative laparoscopy can help in accurately determining the orifice of the re-recurrent inguinal hernia. Based on that information, the hernia sac can be reached through the shortest route using the anterior open approach.

Novel Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty Technique for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia: Overlapping of Whole Posterior Wall with Newly Added Mesh and Pre-Existing Mesh by Closing Hernia Defect

Purpose: In some patients with recurrent inguinal hernias who have undergone previous laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, dissecting the entire posterior wall is difficult due to mesh adhesion. We applied a novel transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty technique that involves closing of the hernia defect and implantation of a newly added mesh while preserving the pre-existing mesh for inguinal hernia recurrence after laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. This study was performed to evaluate this novel technique for treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias. Methods: We evaluated 24 adult patients (23 male, 1 female; mean age, 55.8 ± 14.0 years; range, 26-77 years) with recurring inguinal hernias. A modified TAPP (mTAPP) procedure involving closing of the defect and implantation of an 8 × 6-cm² newly added mesh was performed. The new technique covered the whole posterior wall with pre-existing mesh. Results: Among the 24 patients, there were 12 direct hernias and 12 indirect hernias. The mean postoperative pain scores after 1 week were 2.5 and 2.0 in patients with direct and indirect hernias, respectively, and the mean duration until return to normal activities was 8.5 and 7.5 days in patients with direct and indirect hernias, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 21.0 ± 17.0 (range, 2-56) months. No chronic inguinodynia or rerecurrence was observed. Conclusions: In this novel mTAPP procedure for recurring inguinal hernias, closing sutures prevented mesh migration, and complete posterior wall overlap was possible using the pre-existing mesh and newly added mesh. The mTAPP procedure was an effective operation with few recurrences and complications.

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair in patients with previous lower abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

We have performed laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair for inguinal hernia repair for the last 20 years. We use two balloon dilators (sphere and kidney type) to dissect the preperitoneal space for the TEP repair. It may be difficult to obtain exposure in patients who previously underwent lower abdominal surgery, because of adhesions to the abdominal wall. We reviewed our experience with inguinal hernia repairs to retrospectively analyze factors that limit the laparoscopic TEP approach.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2016, 313 patients (281 men and 32 women) underwent laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair at Yuki Hospital. The medical records of these patients were reviewed, and data for patients who previously underwent lower abdominal surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients previously underwent lower abdominal surgery including appendectomy (N = 23), inguinal hernia repair [N = 45; including contralateral TEP repair (N = 26), ipsilateral anterior approach (N = 11)], and laparotomy with a lower abdominal midline incision (N = 22). TEP repair was successfully completed in 75 patients (75/84; 89%) and the procedure changed in nine patients to an anterior approach (N = 5), or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair (N = 4). The reasons for changing the procedure included difficulty to develop the operative field (N = 5), violation of the integrity of the peritoneal envelope (N = 2), and intraoperative bleeding (N = 2). Seven patients had a contralateral inguinal hernia after TEP repair.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients with an inguinal hernia and previous lower abdominal surgery underwent successful laparoscopic TEP repair. There is no need to avoid the laparoscopic TEP approach, even in patients with a history of previous lower abdominal surgery. However, patients after TEP repair of a contralateral inguinal hernia may be at increased risk for peritoneal injury and the approach may need to be changed.

Current Concepts of Inguinal Hernia Repair

With more than 20 million patients annually, inguinal hernia repair is one of the most often performed surgical procedures worldwide. The lifetime risk to develop an inguinal hernia is 27-43% for men and 3-6% for women. In spite of all advances, 11% of all patients suffer from a recurrence and 10-12% from chronic pain following primary inguinal hernia repair. By developing evidence-based guidelines and recommendations, the international hernia societies aim to improve the outcome of inguinal hernia repair due to standardization of care. From a total of more than 100 different repair techniques for inguinal and femoral hernias, classified as tissue repair, open mesh repair, and laparo-endoscopic mesh repair, the new International Guidelines of the Hernia-Surge Group only recommend the totally extraperitoneal patch plasty (TEP), transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP), and Lichtenstein techniques. Since a generally accepted technique suitable for all inguinal hernias does not exist, surgeons should provide both an anterior open (Lichtenstein) and a posterior laparo-endoscopic (TEP or TAPP) approach option. The guidelines strongly recommend that surgeons tailor the treatment of inguinal hernias based on expertise, local/national resources, and patient- and hernia-related factors. A tailored approach in inguinal hernia repair should pay heed to the patient- and hernia-related factors, unilateral hernia in men and women, bilateral hernia, recurrent hernia, scrotal hernia, previous pelvic and lower abdominal surgery, severe cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities, and incarcerated hernia.

Diagnostic Laparoscopy as Decision Tool for Re-recurrent Inguinal Hernia Treatment Following Open Anterior and Laparo-Endoscopic Posterior Repair

INTRODUCTION

The guidelines of the international hernia societies recommend posterior repair in laparo-endoscopic technique for recurrent inguinal hernia after open anterior mesh repair and, conversely, open anterior repair for recurrence after laparo-endoscopic primary repair. Even when these guidelines are followed, already 1 year after repair a re-recurrence rate of 1-2% must be expected, with that rate rising further in the subsequent years. Accordingly, increasingly more patients with re-recurrence after anterior and posterior mesh implantation must be treated, which constitutes a problem that to date has been investigated in only very few studies. Hence, there are no well-founded recommendations. This paper now presents a number of case reports aimed at identifying the role of explorative laparoscopy as decision tool for re-recurrent inguinal hernia treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Based on three case reports the role of explorative laparoscopy as decision tool for re-recurrent inguinal hernia treatment is presented below.

RESULTS

In all the three cases described explorative laparoscopy played a key role as decision tool when deciding how best to treat re-recurrence after anterior and posterior inguinal hernia repair. In one case severe adhesions after robotic prostatectomy and in another case correct placement of the mesh in the posterior plane, adhesions from the cecum to the groin region and no definitive finding of a re-recurrence resulted in an open repair. In the third case, an insufficient laparoscopic posterior mesh placement made the re-recurrent TAPP procedure relatively easy.

CONCLUSION

Explorative laparoscopy is an important decision tool for re-recurrent inguinal hernia treatment to minimize the risks of the procedure for the patients.