Study of self-expandable metallic stent placement intraluminal 125I seed strands brachytherapy of malignant biliary obstruction

Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers

Backgrounds/Aims

Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021.

Methods

Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop.

Results

In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing.

Conclusions

The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Therapeutic biliary stents: applications and opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Biliary stents are used to optimize ductal patency and enable bile flow in the management of obstruction or injury related to biliary tract tumors, strictures, stones, or leaks. Although direct therapeutic applications of biliary stents are less well developed, stents can be used to deliver drugs, radioisotopes, and photodynamic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This report provides an in-depth overview of the clinical indications, and therapeutic utility of biliary stents. Unique considerations for the design of biliary stents are described. The properties and functionalities of materials used for stents such as metal alloys, plastic polymers, or biodegradable materials are described, and opportunities for design of future stents are outlined. Current and potential applications of stents for therapeutic applications for biliary tract diseases are described.

EXPERT OPINION

Therapeutic biliary stents could be used to minimize inflammation, prevent stricture formation, reduce infections, or provide localized anti-cancer therapy for biliary tract cancers. Stents could be transformed into therapeutic platforms using advanced materials, 3D printing, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence. Whilst clinical study and validation will be required for adoption, future advances in stent design and materials are expected to expand the use of therapeutic biliary stents for the treatment of biliary tract disorders.

Stent Insertion for Inoperable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison Between Unilateral Radioactive Stent and Bilateral Normal Stent

OBJECTIVE

To comparatively analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral radioactive stent (RS) insertion versus bilateral normal stent (NS) insertion in patients with inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inoperable HC were treated in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2020. The treatment approach included the insertion of either unilateral RS or bilateral NS, evaluating the efficacy and safety of therapy in 2 distinct groups.

RESULTS

A total of 58 individuals experienced the insertion of a unilateral RS, whereas 57 patients underwent the insertion of bilateral NS. No statistically significant difference between the unilateral RS and bilateral NS groups was seen in the technical success rates (98.3% vs 94.7%, P = 0.598) and clinical success rates (98.2% vs 100%, P = 0.514). While there is no statistically significant difference in the rates of stent restenosis (19.3% vs 9.3%, P = 0.132) between the two groups, the unilateral RS group demonstrated substantially longer stent patency (202 vs 119 d, P = 0.016) and overall survival (229 vs 122 d, P = 0.004) compared with the bilateral NS group. Moreover, 8 patients (14.0%) in the unilateral RS group and 14 patients (25.9%) in the bilateral NS group had postoperative complications with no significant difference ( P = 0.116).

CONCLUSION

When inserting stents for inoperable HC, both unilateral RS and bilateral NS insertion procedures have demonstrated favorable therapeutic efficacy. Nevertheless, inserting a unilateral RS provided a longer duration of stent patency and overall survival than implantation of bilateral NS.

Safety and efficacy of biliary stenting combined with iodine-125 seed strand followed by hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib with PD-1 inhibitor for the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with malignant obstructive jaundice

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biliary stenting implantation with iodine-125 seed strand (SI) followed by hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus lenvatinib (Len) with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients diagnosed with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) and malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ).

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, the data of ECC patients with MOJ from March 2015 to January 2023 was assessed. Using probability score matching (PSM), the selection bias of patients was reduced. Primary study outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The OS and PFS were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated with the log-rank test.

Results

A total of 104 patients were enrolled finally, including 52 patients treated with interventional therapy (SI+HAIC) plus Len with PD-1 inhibitor (SI+HAIC+Len+P group) and 52 patients treated with interventional therapy (SI+HAIC) plus lenvatinib (SI+HAIC+Len group). 26 pairs of patients were matched after PSM analysis. After PSM analysis, the median OS and PFS in the SI+HAIC+Len+P group were significantly longer compared to those in the SI+HAIC+Len group (OS:16.6 vs. 12.3 months, P = 0.001; PFS:12.6 vs 8.5 months, P = 0.004). The DCR was significantly different between groups (P = 0.039), while ORR not (P = 0.548). The addition of PD-1 inhibitor was generally well tolerated without treatment-associated mortality.

Conclusion

Interventional therapy (SI+HAIC) plus Len with PD-1 inhibitor was effective for ECC patients accompanied by MOJ with a manageable safety profile.

Predicting early biliary infection after stenting of malignant biliary obstruction: model development and internal validation

PURPOSE

To analyze the risk factors and develop a clinical prediction model for early biliary infection (EBI) after percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).

METHODS

The clinical data of 236 patients with MBO treated with PTBS from June 2012 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Independent risk factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram model was constructed based on the results. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of this model were further assessed.

RESULTS

The technical success rate of PTBS was 100%, and EBI after PTBS was 20.3%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that hilar MBO (P = 0.020), diabetes (P = 0.001), previous surgical or endoscopic intervention (P = 0.007), procedure time > 60 min (P = 0.007), and intraprocedural biliary hemorrhage (P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for EBI after PTBS. A nomogram model was developed to predict the probability of EBI. ROC curves showed good discrimination of the model (area under curve = 0.831). The calibration plot indicated that the predicted probability of EBI by this model was in good agreement with the actual probability of EBI. The DCA curves showed that the net benefit of nomogram-assisted decisions was higher than or equal to the net benefit of treatment for all or none at a wide threshold probability (0-0.8).

CONCLUSION

The nomogram model based on the above independent risk factors can predict the probability of EBI and model-assisted treatment decisions contribute to improved clinical outcome. Therefore, MBO patients with probability of EBI > 0.20 based on the model should be recommended for perioperative broad-spectrum antibiotics and close monitoring.

Clinical outcomes of intraluminal Iodine-125 seed strand brachytherapy and percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with ureteral carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraluminal iodine-125 seed strand brachytherapy and percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with ureteral carcinoma.

METHODS

From January 2014 to January 2023, 48 patients with ureteral cancer not suitable for surgical resection were enrolled. Iodine-125 seed strand was inserted in 26 patients under c-arm CT and fluoroscopic guidance (Group A), and 22 patients underwent percutaneous nephrostomy without seed strand (Group B). The clinical outcomes (technical success rate, tumor sizes, hydronephrosis Girignon grade, complications, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and survival time) were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 53 seed strands were successfully inserted and replaced in Group A, with a technical success rate of 100%. No procedure-related death or severe complications occurred in both group. Migration of seed strand or drainage tube was the most common complication. The Girignon grade of hydronephrosis was significantly improved 1, 3 and 6 months after procedure in both groups. DCR in Group A were 96.2%, 80.0%, and 70.0% at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow up, respectively. At 1 and 6 months later, ORR in Group A were significantly higher than those in Group B (p < 0.05). The median overall survival were 30.0 months in Group A and 16.1 months in Group B, respectively (p = 0.04). The median progression-free survival were 11.1 months in Group A and 6.9 months in Group B, respectively (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Intraluminal Iodine-125 seed strand brachytherapy and percutaneous nephrostomy is safe and effective in patients with ureteral carcinoma, with higher ORR and median overall survival than patients underwent percutaneous nephrostomy without seed strand.

Biliary drainage combined with simultaneous 125I seed strand brachytherapy for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) combined with ¹²⁵I seed strand brachytherapy (ISSB) for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).

METHODS

The clinical data of 64 patients with HCCA (median age 62.5, male 29, female 35) treated in our department from April 2017 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-four patients in the experimental group (EG) were treated with PBD combined with ISSB, while 30 patients in the control group (CG) were treated with PBD alone. The primary study endpoints were technical success, clinical success and the 2-month local tumor control (LTC) rate. Secondary endpoints were early/late complications, median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS).

RESULTS

The technical and clinical success in the EG and CG showed no significant differences (100 vs. 100%, 94.1 vs. 93.3%, P > 0.05). Both early and late complications showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). The 2-month LTC rates were significantly better in the EG versus the CG (94.1% vs. 26.7%, 157.7 ± 115.3 vs. 478.1 ± 235.3 U/ml), respectively (P < 0.05). The mPFS and mOS were 4.3 (95% CI 3.9-4.7) months and 2.8 (95% CI 2.5-3.1) months and 13.5 (95% CI 10.7-16.3) months and 8.8 (95% CI 7.8-9.8) months, respectively, with significant differences (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PBD combined with ISSB is a safe and effective treatment for HCCA that can inhibit local tumors and prolong PFS and OS.

Safety and efficacy of iodine-125 seed strand for intraluminal brachytherapy on ureteral carcinoma

Objective

Our aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iodine-125 seed strand for intraluminal brachytherapy on ureteral carcinoma.

Methods

From November 2014 to November 2021, 22 patients with ureteral cancer not suitable for surgical resection were enrolled. Iodine-125 seed strand was inserted under c-arm CT and fluoroscopic guidance. The technical success rate, complications, disease control rate, and survival time were evaluated. Hydronephrosis Girignon grade and ureteral cancer sizes before and after treatment were compared.

Results

A total of 46 seed strands were successfully inserted and replaced, with a technical success rate of 100% and median procedure time of 62 min. No procedure-related death, ureteral perforation, infection, or severe bleeding occurred. Minor complications were observed in eight (36.4%) patients, and migration of seed strand was the most common complication. Six months after seed strand brachytherapy, one complete response, three partial responses, and five stable diseases were evaluated, and the disease control rate was 64.3%. The Girignon grade of hydronephrosis was significantly improved 1 to 3 months after seed strand insertion. Disease control rates were 94.4, 62.5, and 64.3% at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Twenty patients were successfully followed up, with a mean follow-up of 18.0 ± 14.5 months. The median overall survival and progress-free survival were 24.7 and 13.0 months, respectively.

Conclusion

Iodine-125 seed strand is safe and effective for intraluminal brachytherapy and can be used as an alternative to patients with ureteral carcinoma who are not suitable for surgical resection or systemic combined therapy.

Brachytherapy Drainage Catheter and Chemotherapy for Unresectable Pancreatic Carcinoma Combined with Obstructive Jaundice

Background

Most patients with advanced pancreatic cancer do not have the chance to undergo surgery or chemotherapy because of their poor conditions. Biliary drainage is a palliative treatment to restore liver function and alleviate jaundice, but most patients still face the risk of biliary obstruction in the short term after operation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brachytherapy drainage catheter (BDC)-combined chemotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer complicated with obstructive jaundice.

Patients and Methods

From November 2017 and May 2019, 48 patients underwent the BDC or conventional drainage catheter (CDC) intervention with chemotherapy. The outcomes/endpoints analyzed were technical and clinical success, early complications, stent patency period, and survival.

Results

The technical and clinical success rates in both groups were 100%, and the early complication rates were not significantly different (P = 0.43). The median stent patency in the BDC group was significantly longer than that in the CDC group (7.8 ± 1.5 vs. 5.7 ± 0.7 months, P = 0.001), and the median overall survival period in the BDC group was prone to significant difference than that in the CDC group (9.4 ± 4.0 vs. 8.2 ± 0.3 months, P = 0.089).

Conclusion

The findings of this study show that BDC with chemotherapy was associated with better stent patency and survival. However, since the sample size was very small, large randomized controlled multicenter studies are needed to further evaluate the long-term survival effects of BDC in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma combined with obstructive jaundice.

I-125 seed-loaded versus normal stent insertion for obstructive esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

Introduction

Malignant esophageal obstruction is usually caused by esophageal and other chest cancers. More than 80% of cases of obstructive esophageal cancer (OEC) have lost the chance of curative resection. Stent insertion is a first-line palliative approach used to treat incurable OEC.

Aim

To gauge the relative clinical efficacy of I-125 seed-loaded stent (ISS) versus normal stent (NS) insertion as a treatment for OEC.

Material and methods

Querying of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to find all relevant studies published up to November 2020. The meta-analysis was undertaken using RevMan v5.3.

Results

We identified 158 studies initially, eight (4 randomized controlled trials and 4 retrospective studies) of which were used in this meta-analysis. We found that the two groups exhibited the comparable pooled Δdysphagia scores (MD = 0.02; p = 0.80), stent restenosis rates (OR = 0.97; p = 0.89), stent migration rates (OR = 0.81; p = 0.63), severe chest pain rates (OR = 1.05; p = 0.81), hemorrhage rates (OR = 1.53; p = 0.16), aspiration pneumonia rates (OR = 0.72; p = 0.38), and fistula formation rates (OR = 1.47; p = 0.44). The pooled time-to-restenosis and survival were both significantly longer in the ISS group (p = 0.04 and < 0.0001, respectively). Significant heterogeneity was detected in the endpoints of Δdysphagia scores and survival (I² = 73% and 86%, respectively). Funnel plot analysis indicated an absence of publication bias related to the selected study endpoints.

Conclusions

For patients with OEC, our meta-analysis indicated that ISS insertion could provide longer stent patency and survival than NS insertion.

Insertion of I-125 seed-loaded stent for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Introduction

Stent insertion is the most frequently used option to treat malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) patients. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) is the most common disease that causes hilar MBO.

Aim

To assess the clinical efficacy and long-term outcomes of I-125 seed-loaded stent (ISS) insertion for HCCA patients.

Material and methods

Consecutive patients with HCCA underwent either normal stent (NS) or ISS insertion between January 2017 and December 2019. The baseline and treatment data of these two groups were compared.

Results

During the period, a total of 93 patients with inoperable HCCA were divided into either NS (n = 48) or ISS (n = 45) insertion groups at our centre. Technical success rates of the NS and ISS insertion were 91.7% and 95.6%, respectively (p = 0.733). Clinical success rates were 93.2% and 100% in the NS and ISS groups, respectively (p = 0.24). Stent dysfunction was observed in 11 and 8 patients in the NS and ISS groups, respectively (p = 0.47). The median stent patency was 143 days and 208 days in the NS and ISS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). All patients died in the follow-up period, with median survival duration of 178 days and 220 days in the NS and ISS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). ISS insertion was the only predictor of longer patency (p = 0.002) and survival (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

ISS insertion might achieve longer patency and overall survival in patients with inoperable HCCA as compared with NS insertion.

Percutaneous biliary stent combined with brachytherapy using 125I seeds for treatment of unresectable malignant obstructive jaundice: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ) is a common pathologic manifestation of malignant biliary obstruction. Recently, several clinical trials have explored the clinical effectiveness of intraluminal ¹²⁵I seed-based brachytherapy for MOJ patients, and various outcomes have been reported.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous biliary stents with ¹²⁵I seeds compared to conventional metal stents in patients with unresectable MOJ.

METHODS

A systematic search of English-language databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies published prior to June 2020 that compared stents with or without ¹²⁵I seeds in the treatment of unresectable MOJ. The outcomes analyzed included primary outcomes (stent patency and overall survival) and secondary outcomes (complications and liver function parameters).

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials and four retrospective studies involving 875 patients were eligible for the analysis. Of the 875 included patients, 404 were treated with ¹²⁵I seed stents, while 471 were treated with conventional stents. Unadjusted pooled analysis demonstrated that compared to conventional stents, ¹²⁵I seed stents extended the stent patency time [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28-0.45, P < 0.0001] and overall survival period (HR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.42–0.64, P < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses based on the type of ¹²⁵I seed stent and type of study design showed consistent results. However, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of total complications [odds ratio (OR) = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.75-1.67, P = 0.57], hemobilia (OR = 1.02, 95%CI = 0.45-2.3, P = 0.96), pancreatitis (OR = 1.79, 95%CI = 0.42-7.53, P = 0.43), cholangitis (OR = 1.13, 95%CI = 0.60-2.13, P = 0.71), or pain (OR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.22-2, P = 0.47). In addition, there were no reductions in the levels of serum indices, including total bilirubin [mean difference (MD) = 10.96, 95%CI = -3.56-25.49, P = 0.14], direct bilirubin (MD = 7.37, 95%CI = -9.76-24.5, P = 0.4), alanine aminotransferase (MD = 7.52, 95%CI = -0.71-15.74, P = 0.07), and aspartate aminotransferase (MD = -4.77, 95%CI = -19.98-10.44, P = 0.54), after treatment. Publication bias was detected regarding the outcome overall survival; however, the conclusions were not changed after the adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Placement of stents combined with brachytherapy using ¹²⁵I seeds contributes to a longer stent patency and higher overall survival than placement of conventional stents without extra complications or severe liver damage. Thus, it can be considered an effective and safe treatment for unresectable MOJ.

Stent with radioactive strand insertion for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of unilateral and bilateral insertion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relative clinical efficacy associated with the unilateral and bilateral insertion of a stent with a radioactive strand (RS) for the treatment of inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) patients.

METHODS

From January 2017 to June 2020, consecutive patients diagnosed with inoperable HCCA underwent either unilateral or bilateral stent with RS insertion in our hospital. Outcomes compared between these groups included rates of technical success, clinical success, stent-related complications, stent patency and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Unilateral and bilateral stent with RS insertion procedures were performed in 36 and 30 patients over the study period, respectively, with 100% technical and clinical success rates in both groups. No instances of procedure-related complications were reported. Cholangitis was observed in 7 (19.4%) and 6 (20%) patients in unilateral and bilateral groups (p= .955), respectively, while these groups exhibited respective cholecystitis in 2 (5.5%) and 1 (3.3%) cases, respectively (p=.662), and stent restenosis in 9 (25%) and 7 (23.3%) cases, respectively (p=.661). The median duration of stent patency in the unilateral and bilateral groups was comparable at 208 and 222 d, respectively (p=.889). All patients died over the course of follow-up, with similar median OS rates in the unilateral and bilateral groups of 250 and 246 d, respectively (p=.483).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicated that similar inoperable HCCA patient clinical outcomes are achieved following stent with RS insertion regardless of whether it is conducted via a unilateral or bilateral approach.

Radioactive Seed Strand Efficacy in Superior Vena Cava Stenting Due to Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Obstruction

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine the clinical effectiveness of a stent with radioactive seed strand (RSS) inserted in patients with superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction (SVCO) secondary to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2019, 63 patients with SVCO related to NSCLC received stent implantation with (n = 30) or without (n = 33) RSS insertion at our center. The clinical efficacy, stent patency duration, and overall survival (OS) were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

Both groups achieved 100% clinical and technical success rates. There were no obstacles associated with the procedure performed for the patients. Two patients in the RSS group and 7 patients in the stent-alone group experienced stent re-stenosis. The rate of re-stenosis between the two groups was not significantly different (P = .099). Patients in the RSS group had significantly longer median patency than those in the stent-alone group (381 vs 309 days, P = .045). All patients died because of the development of tumors during the follow-up. Patients in the RSS group had a significantly longer median OS than those in the stent-alone group (229 vs 178 days, P = .026). During the follow-up, no patient in the RSS group suffered RSS migration or brachytherapy-related complications.

CONCLUSION

For patients with SVCO secondary to NSCLC, a stent with RSS insertion is efficacious and safe, and it may improve stent patency and OS.

Locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma with jaundice: the benefit of a sequential treatment with stenting followed by CT-guided 125I seeds implantation

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of sequential therapy with percutaneous biliary stenting and CT-guided iodine-125 seed implantation for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma with concomitant obstructive jaundice.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2018, 42 patients diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma with concomitant obstructive jaundice were enrolled retrospectively. All patients received biliary stenting via percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) to alleviate obstructive jaundice. Thereafter, twenty-two patients underwent CT-guided iodine-125 seed implantation (treatment group), and 20 did not (control group). The prescribed dose in the treatment group was 110-130 Gy. The clinical data, duration of biliary stent patency, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, the total bilirubin level decreased from 275.89 ± 115.44 to 43.08 ± 43.35 μmol/L (p < 0.001) 1 month after percutaneous biliary stenting. In the treatment group, the postoperative median dose covering 90% of the target volume was 129.71 Gy. Compared with the control group, the treatment group had a long mean duration of biliary stent patency and median OS (11.42 vs. 8.57 months, p < 0.01; 11.67 vs. 9.40 months, p < 0.01, respectively). The overall positive response rates 6 months post-treatment in the treatment and control groups were 72.7% (16/22) and 30% (6/20), respectively. Adverse events of more than grade 3 were not observed during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Sequential therapy with percutaneous biliary stenting and CT-guided iodine-125 seed implantation is an effective and safe treatment alternative for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma with concomitant obstructive jaundice, which is worthy of clinical application.

KEY POINTS

• Obstructive jaundice was alleviated after biliary stent placement in all patients, and the total bilirubin level decreased. • The overall positive response rates at 6 months post-treatment were higher in the treatment group than in the control group, and adverse events of more than grade 3 were not observed during the follow-up period. • Sequential therapy with percutaneous biliary stenting and CT-guided iodine-125 seed implantation can prolong biliary stent patency and improve survival.

A Comparative Study of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Combined with Double 125I Seeds Strands or Single 125I Seeds Strand in the Treatment of Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma with Malignant Obstructive Jaundice

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMs) with a novel brachytherapy biliary drainage catheter (BBDC, double ¹²⁵I seeds strands) or a single ¹²⁵I seeds strand in the treatment of advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) with malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ).

Methods

From September 2016 to December 2018, we retrospectively enrolled patients with biliary stent implantation after receiving either BBDC loaded with ¹²⁵I seeds (double-strands irradiation group) or an ¹²⁵I seed strand treatment (single-strand irradiation group, control group). The outcomes were analyzed regarding the relief of obstructive jaundice, and interventional-related complications. Moreover, the Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze stent patency and survival.

Results

The success rate of interventional therapy in both groups was 100%, and all patients with MOJ were alleviated. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.02), the grade 3 or 4 complications in the BBDC group and in the control group were 6/34 (17.65%) and 7/39 (17.95%), respectively (P > 0.05). The median and mean overall stent patency of the BBDC group and the control group were 207 days versus 180 days, 204.212 days versus 186.278 days (P = 0.043). The median and mean overall survivals in the BBDC group were higher than those in the control group (245 days versus 212 days, 244.883 days versus 221.844 days, P = 0.030).

Conclusion

This interim analysis showed that BBDC (double-stranded irradiation) can prolong the stent patency time compared with ¹²⁵I seed strand treatment (single-stranded irradiation) and had the advantage of reducing jaundice, which seemed to extend the survival period of advanced pCCA.

Stent insertion for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison of radioactive and normal stenting

To assess effectiveness and safety associated with radioactive stenting for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) patients.This single-center retrospective study compared baseline and treatment data of recruited consecutive patients with HCCA underwent either normal or radioactive stenting between January 2016 and December 2019. Clinical success was defined by total bilirubin (TBIL) levels falling below 70% of the preoperative baseline within 2 weeks post stent insertion.Sixty-five patients with inoperable HCCA underwent normal (n = 35) or radioactive (n = 30) stenting at our center. Technical success of both types of the normal and radioactive stent insertion was 100%. Each patient received 1 stent. In the radioactive stent group, each patient received 1 radioactive seed strand (RSS), containing 10 to 12 radioactive seeds. Clinical success rates were 86.8% and 100% in normal and radioactive groups, respectively (P = .495). We observed stent dysfunction in 9 patients (normal group) and 7 patients (radioactive group) (P = .824). Median duration of stent patency was 165 days (normal group) and 226 days (radioactive group) (P < .001). During follow-up, all patients died from tumor progression, with respective median survival of 198 days (normal group) and 256 days (radioactive group) (P < .001). Seven and 5 patients in the normal and radioactive groups suffered from stent-related complications (P = .730).Radioactive stenting is effective and safe for inoperable HCCA patient and may prolong stent patency and survival.

Irradiation stent insertion for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The purpose of the study was to compare the relative clinical efficacies of irradiation stent (IRS) and conventional stent (CVS) insertions for the treatment of patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the date of inception through to August 2020. Data analysis was performed using RevMan v5.3. This meta-analysis included eight RCTs which included a total of 319 patients who had undergone IRS insertion, and 328 who had undergone CVS insertion. No significant differences in pooled Δ total bilirubin values (MD 0.34; P = 0.92), incident rates of cholangitis (P = 0.47), hemobilia (P = 0.60), or pancreatitis (P = 0.89) were detected between two groups. The rate of stent dysfunction was significantly lower in the IRS group compared to the CVS group (22.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.02). The pooled stent patency (P < 0.00001) and survival (P < 0.00001) were significantly longer in the IRS group compared to the CVS group. Significant heterogeneity was detected in the endpoints of rate of stent dysfunction (I² = 52%; P = 0.08) and survival (I² = 77%; P = 0.0005). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the different IRS types and showed significantly longer survival in the IRS group based on both types of IRS. Funnel plot analyses did not detect any evidence of publication bias. This meta-analysis included eight RCTs which included a total of 319 patients who had undergone IRS insertion, and 328 who had undergone CVS insertion. No significant differences in pooled Δ total bilirubin values (MD 0.34; P = 0.92), incident rates of cholangitis (P = 0.47), hemobilia (P = 0.60), or pancreatitis (P = 0.89) were detected between 2 groups. The rate of stent dysfunction was significantly lower in the IRS group compared to the CVS group (22.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.02). The pooled stent patency (P < 0.00001) and survival (P < 0.00001) were significantly longer in the IRS group compared to the CVS group. Significant heterogeneity was detected in the endpoints of rate of stent dysfunction (I² = 52%; P = 0.08) and survival (I² = 77%; P = 0.0005). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the different IRS types and showed significantly longer survival in the IRS group based on both types of IRS. Funnel plot analyses did not detect any evidence of publication bias. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that IRS insertion can prolong stent patency and the survival of patients with MBO compared to CVS insertion.

Irradiation stent insertion for distal biliary obstruction secondary to primary common biliary cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of irradiation stent insertion for patients with distal biliary obstruction (DBO) secondary to primary common biliary cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-two consecutive patients with DBO secondary to primary common biliary cancer were treated via either normal (n = 45) or irradiation stenting (n = 37) between January 2013 and December 2019. The instant and long-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Technical success rates of normal and irradiation stenting were both 100%. Clinical success rates of normal and irradiation stenting were 91.1 and 100%, respectively (p = .179). Stent reobstruction was observed in 13 and 7 patients in the normal and irradiation stenting groups, respectively (p = .295). The median stent patency was 162 and 225 days in the normal and irradiation stenting groups, respectively (p < .001). The median survival was 178 and 250 days in the normal and irradiation stenting groups, respectively (p < .001). Cholangitis was, respectively, observed in 8 and 12 patients in normal and irradiation stenting groups (p = .124).

CONCLUSION

Irradiation stenting is effective and safe for patients with DBO secondary to primary common biliary cancer and can prolong stent patency and survival.

A stent with radioactive seed strand insertion for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess the relative clinical effectiveness of stent insertion with or without radioactive seed strand (RSS) insertion in patients suffering from malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Relevant articles published as of November 2020 in the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were identified and analyzed. Primary study endpoints for this meta-analysis were stent dysfunction, stent patency, and overall survival (OS), whereas secondary endpoints were rates of clinical success and complications. RevMan v5.3 was used to perform all meta-analyses.

RESULTS

In total, there were nine studies incorporating 643 patients (280 and 363 who underwent stent insertion with and without RSS, respectively). No differences were observed between these groups with respect to pooled rates of clinical success (p = 0.25), stent dysfunction (p = 0.47), cholangitis (p = 0.97), cholecystitis (p = 0.95), or pancreatitis (p = 0.66). However, stent patency duration (p < 0.00001) and patients' OS (p < 0.00001) were significantly increased in patients in the stent + RSS group. No heterogeneity was detected for any of these endpoints, nor did funnel plots yield any publication bias. A subgroup analysis of patients with hilar MBO similarly exhibited stent + RSS insertion to be associated with longer stent patency and OS as compared with stent insertion alone.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings showed that relative to stent insertion, stent + RSS insertion is associated with longer OS and stent patency in patients with inoperable MBO.

Biliary stent combined with iodine-125 seed strand implantation in malignant obstructive jaundice

BACKGROUND

Malignant obstructive jaundice is mainly caused by cholangiocarcinoma. Only a few patients are indicated for surgical resection, and the 3-year survival rate is < 50%. For patients who are not eligible for surgery, biliary stent placement can relieve biliary obstruction and improve liver function and quality of life. However, restenosis after biliary stents has a poor prognosis and is a clinical challenge. Biliary stent combined with iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed implantation can prolong stent patency and improve survival.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of biliary stent combined with ¹²⁵I seed strand implantation in malignant obstructive jaundice.

METHODS

We enrolled 67 patients between January 2016 and June 2018 with malignant obstructive jaundice and randomized them into a biliary stent combined with ¹²⁵I seed strand treatment (combined) group (n = 32) and biliary stent (control) group (n = 35). All patients underwent enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and were tested for biochemical and cancer markers. Twelve patients underwent pathological examination before surgery. All patients were followed up by telephone or clinical visit. Postoperative liver function improvement, postoperative complications, stent patency time, and survival time were compared between the two groups. Prognostic risk factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all patients in both groups. Postoperative liver function improved significantly in all patients (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase decreased significantly in all patients, the P values were less than 0.05). There was no significant difference in preoperative or postoperative indexes between the two groups for changes in total bilirubin (P = 0.147), direct bilirubin (P = 0.448), alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.120), and aspartate aminotransferase (P = 0.387) between the two groups. The median stent patency time of the combined group was 9.0 ± 1.4 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.3-11.8 mo], which was significantly longer than the that of the control group (6.0 ± 0.3 mo, 95%CI: 5.5-6.5 mo, P = 0.000). The median survival time of the combined group was 11.0 ± 1.4 mo (95%CI: 8.2-13.7 mo), which was significantly longer than that of the control group (7.0 ± 0.3 mo, 95%CI: 6.4-7.6 mo, P = 0.000). Location of obstruction and number of stents were independent risk factors affecting prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Biliary stent combined with ¹²⁵I seed strand implantation is safe and effective in malignant obstructive jaundice and improves stent patency time and median survival time.

Investigation of a novel brachytherapy ureteral stent: trial studies on normal beagle dogs

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of a newly designed ¹²⁵I brachytherapy ureteral stent (BUS) in normal dogs.

METHODS

A BUS loaded with 10 ¹²⁵I seeds (Group A: 0.8 mCi, Group B: 0.4 mCi, Group C: 0 mCi) was designed and tested in 27 normal beagle dogs. Routine blood tests, gross observations, cumulative radiation doses, tissue reaction assessed by hematoxylin-eosin/Masson staining, mRNA analysis by RT-qPCR and protein expression of Caspase-3, Collagen I, PCNA, and α-SMA were performed at 2, 4 and 8 weeks.

RESULTS

The BUS was implanted successfully in all dogs (27/27) without surgery-related death. The ureter diameter and radiation injury score increased along with radiation accumulation (p < 0.05). Histopathologic analysis showed necrotic tissue and lateral fibrosis to different extents in the ureteral walls that gradually increased in all groups (p < 0.05); however, epithelial cell proliferation in groups A and B was lighter than that in the control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Placement of the newly designed ¹²⁵I BUS was safe and feasible in dogs, and clinical studies are required to test its use in humans.

Stent insertion with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for malignant biliary obstruction: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted in order to understand the clinical efficacy of stent insertion with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).

METHODS

The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all relevant studies published through July 2020. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan v5.3, with analyzed study endpoints including the rate of stent dysfunction, time to stent dysfunction, stent patency, complication rate, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 35 potentially relevant studies were initially identified, of which 6 were ultimately included in the present meta-analysis. These 6 studies included 429 MBO patients that were treated either only via stenting (n = 221) or via stenting in combination with HIFU ablation (n = 208). Pooled stent dysfunction rates in the stent and stent with HIFU groups were 25.9% and 18.0%, respectively (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 0.88, 2.84, P = .12). The average time to stent dysfunction was significantly longer in the stent with HIFU group relative to the stent group (MD: -3.15; 95% CI: -3.53, -2.77, P < .0001). Pooled complication rates in the stent and stent with HIFU groups were 17.1% and 19.6%, respectively (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.58, P = .67). Stent patency and OS were both significantly longer in the stent with HIFU group relative to the stent group (P < .0001 and.0001, respectively). Funnel plot analyses did not reveal any significant evidence of publication bias linked to the selected study endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found that a combined stenting and HIFU ablation approach can achieve better stent patency and OS in MBO patients relative to stent insertion alone.

Covered vs bare stent for distal malignant biliary obstruction due to primary common biliary cancer

This study was designed as a means of comparing the clinical efficacy and long-term outcomes of covered vs bare stent insertion as a treatment for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) caused by primary common biliary cancer (PCBC).This retrospective study was designed using data collected between January 2012 and December 2019 to assess the short- and long-term outcomes in patients with DMBO caused by PCBC treated by inserting either bare or covered stents were compared.Ninety two patients with DMBO caused by PCBC were divided between bare (n = 51) or covered (n = 41) stent groups. Technical success rates in both groups were 100%. Clinical success of bare vs covered stent use were 96.1% and 97.6% (P = 1.00). Stent dysfunction was seen in 17 and 6 patients in the bare and covered stent groups, respectively (P = .04). The median stent patency for bare and covered stents was 177 and 195 days, respectively (P = .51). The median survival was 188 and 200 days in the bare and covered stent groups, respectively (P = .85).For patients with DMBO caused by PCBC, using bare vs covered stents yields similar clinical efficacy and long term outcomes.

Managing occluded stents in biliary obstruction using radiofrequency ablation combined with 125I-strand brachytherapy

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) combined with iodine-125 (125I) seed strand brachytherapy (125I-BT) for treatment of occluded biliary stents.

METHODS

From November 2015 to September 2017, 13 consecutive patients with occluded biliary metal stents, implanted for malignant obstruction, underwent PRFA combined with 125I-BT to reopen the bile duct. Data included clinical and technical success, stent patency, complications, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The clinical and technical success rates were both 100%. One month after treatment, the total serum bilirubin level had decreased significantly (P < 0.001). Early complications of cholangitis or hemobilia were experienced by one patient each. Three patients (23.1%) had late complications, including two cases of cholangitis and one case of cholecystitis. During the mean follow-up of 233±82.9 days (range, 88-365 days), the stent patency time was 239±26.5 days (95% CI, 187-291 days), and the 6-month stent patency rate was 68.4%. Five patents died; the mean survival time was 298±30.1 days (95% CI, 239-358 days). The 6-month survival rate was 83%.

CONCLUSION

PRFA therapy combined with 125I-BT is feasible and safe for patients with occluded metal stents placed for malignant biliary obstruction. Nevertheless, randomized controlled trails are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this new approach.

Advances in stent therapy for malignant biliary obstruction

Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), result of pancreatobiliary diseases is a challenging condition. Most patients with MBO are inoperable at the time of diagnosis, and the disease is poorly controlled using external-beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Biliary stent therapy emerged as a promising strategy for alleviating MBO and prolonging life. However, physicians find it difficult to determine the optimal type of biliary stent for the palliation of MBO. Here, we review the safety and efficacy of available biliary stents, used alone or in combination with brachytherapy, photodynamic therapy and advanced chemotherapeutics, in patients with pancreatobiliary malignancies and put forward countermeasures involving stent obstruction. Furthermore, 3D-printing stents and nanoparticle-loaded stents have broad application prospects for fabricating tailor-made biliary stents.

Iodine-125 Seeds Combined With Biliary Stent Placement Versus Stent Placement Alone For Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background and Aims: Malignant biliary obstruction is always caused by tumors which are unresectable so that palliative stent placement is conducted for drainage of bile duct tree. Recently, irradiation stent with 125I seeds has been used to improve the stent patency and survival time of patients. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of biliary stent placement with 125I seeds compared with stent placement alone in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. Methods: We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Embase and CNKI databases for all relevant studies up to 1 May 2020. Patient survival, stent patency, and adverse events were the primary outcome measured. Also, Review Manager 5.3 and Stata/SE15.0 were used to perform the analysis. Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials with a total of 767 patients were included for meta-analysis. Stent combined with 125I seeds showed lower risk of stent occlusion at 3 month (Odds Ratios(OR) = 0.15; 95%CI: 0.05-0.49, P =0.002), 6 month (OR = 0.18; 95%CI: 0.08-0.44, P = 0.0001), 9 month (OR = 0.10; 95%CI: 0.05-0.20, P < 0.00001) and 1 year (OR = 0.15; 95%CI: 0.07-0.31, P < 0.00001) and better mean survival (MD = 125days; 95% CI 91-159 days; P < 0.00001) compared with stent placement alone. Also, reconstructed Kaplan-Meier data demonstrated improved survival in patients treated with stent plus 125I seeds (hazard ratio(HR)= 1.886; 95% CI: 1.609 to 2.210; P < 0.0001) Moreover, our analysis did not show significant difference between the two groups about the risk of adverse events including abdominal pain, hemobilia, pancreatitis, cholangitis and cholecystitis. Conclusion: 125I seeds combined with stent demonstrated superior stent patency and improved survival time compared to stent alone with acceptable complications.

Managing occluded stents in biliary obstruction using radiofrequency ablation combined with 125I-strand brachytherapy

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) combined with iodine-125 (125I) seed strand brachytherapy (125I-BT) for treatment of occluded biliary stents.

METHODS

From November 2015 to September 2017, 13 consecutive patients with occluded biliary metal stents, implanted for malignant obstruction, underwent PRFA combined with 125I-BT to reopen the bile duct. Data included clinical and technical success, stent patency, complications, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The clinical and technical success rates were both 100%. One month after treatment, the total serum bilirubin level had decreased significantly (P < 0.001). Early complications of cholangitis or hemobilia were experienced by one patient each. Three patients (23.1%) had late complications, including two cases of cholangitis and one case of cholecystitis. During the mean follow-up of 233±82.9 days (range, 88-365 days), the stent patency time was 239±26.5 days (95% CI, 187-291 days), and the 6-month stent patency rate was 68.4%. Five patents died; the mean survival time was 298±30.1 days (95% CI, 239-358 days). The 6-month survival rate was 83%.

CONCLUSION

PRFA therapy combined with 125I-BT is feasible and safe for patients with occluded metal stents placed for malignant biliary obstruction. Nevertheless, randomized controlled trails are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this new approach.

An iodine-125 seed strand combined with a metal stent versus a metal stent alone for obstructive jaundice caused by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of an iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed strand combined with a metal stent compared with a metal stent for treatment of obstructive jaundice caused by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis was carried out of patients who were referred to Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University with a diagnosis of PDAC between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2019. A total of 110 consecutive patients with obstructive jaundice caused by PDAC were divided into the iodine-125 seed strand combined with a metal stent group (Group A = 48) and the metal stent group (Group B = 62). The primary outcome was stent obstruction-free survival time, and secondary outcomes were overall survival and complications.

RESULTS

The median stent obstruction-free survival time was 133.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 166.093-149.907) days, and the median overall survival was 212.0 (95% CI: 187.183-236.817) days in all patients. Median stent obstruction-free survival time was 175 days (95% CI 103.165-246.835 days) in Group A versus 120 days (95% CI 87.475-152.525 days) in Group B (p = 0.035). A lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (p = 0. 000) and iodine-125 seed strand combined with metal stent implantation (p = 0.008) were associated with a longer stent obstruction-free survival time. Obstruction length (p = 0.083), ECOG score (p = 0.000), and iodine-125 seeds (p = 0.037) might have potential impact on stent obstruction-free survival time and were included for multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. Stent restenosis was observed in 18.8% (9/48) of patients in Group A and 54.8% (34/62) in Group B, respectively. There was no significant difference in median survival between Group A and Group B (p = 0.409). The median survival in Group A was 209 days (95% CI 150.750-267.250) and 202 days (95% CI 190.624-233.376) in Group B. The median survival of patients with a lower ECOG score was better than that of patients with a higher ECOG score (267 days vs 132 days, p = 0.000). The Grade 3 or 4 complications occurred in 4 (8.3%) of the 48 patients in Group A (one case of hemobilia, one case of liver abscess, two cases of choleperitonitis) and in 5 (8.1%) of the 62 patients in Group B (one case of hemobilia, two cases of liver abscess, two cases of choleperitonitis) (p = 0.972).

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of an iodine-125 seed strand combined with a metal stent provides longer obstruction-free survival time compared with a metal stent in patients with obstructive jaundice caused by PDAC. It seems reasonable to choose an iodine-125 seed strand combined with a metal stent as a treatment for these patients.

Stent with radioactive seeds strand insertion for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Purpose: This study aimed to assess clinical efficacy and long-term patient outcomes in individuals with malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) that had been treated via insertion of a stent with a radioactive seed strand (RSS).Material and methods: A total of 84 MHBO patients were treated via either normal stent insertion (n = 48) or stent with RSS insertion (n = 36) from January 2015 to December 2018.Results: The technical success rates of normal stent insertion and stent with RSS insertion were 93.8% (45/48) and 97.2% (35/36), respectively (p = .632), with clinical success rates of 93.3% (42/45) and 100% (35/35), respectively (p = .252). In these two patient groups, 11 and seven patients, respectively, suffered from stent dysfunction (p = .637). In the normal and RSS groups, median stent patency was 165 and 225 days, respectively (p < .001). All patients in the present study died due to tumor progression, with median survival times of 188 and 250 days in the normal and RSS stent groups, respectively (p < .001).Conclusion: Relative to normal stent insertion, combined stent with RSS insertion can effectively prolong both stent patency and patient survival in patients with MHBO.

Stent placement with iodine-125 seeds strand effectively extends the duration of stent patency and survival in patients with unresectable malignant obstructive jaundice

Background: This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes and safety between stent placement with or without Iodine-¹²⁵ (¹²⁵I) seeds strand for patients with unresectable malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ).Methods: A total of 84 patients with unresectable MOJ treated in our hospital were retrospectively included and divided into the stent group (n = 54) undergoing biliary stent placement and the stent + seeds group (n = 30) receiving stent placement with ¹²⁵I seeds strand. The therapeutic outcome, postoperative complications, duration of patient survival and stent patency were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare the duration of patient survival and stent patency between groups. Cox-regression analysis was performed to investigate predictive factors for disease-free survival and overall survival.Results: The stent + seeds group had significantly longer duration of patency (231.57 ± 256.54 vs. 110.37 ± 120.52) and overall survival (310.57 ± 330.54 vs. 173.15 ± 219.40) than the stent group (both p < .05). In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed that the stent + seeds group had longer duration of patency (log-rank test, p = .001) and higher overall survival rate (log-rank test, p = .020) than the stent group. Furthermore, Cox-regression analysis demonstrated that treatment methods was an independent factor associated with disease-free survival (HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19-0.70; p = .003) and overall survival (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01; p < .001).Conclusion: The stent placement with ¹²⁵I seeds strand can significantly improve the primary patency rate and overall survival time in MOJ patients.

The role of seed implantation in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using ERCP

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of iodine-125 seed implantation, guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or percutanous ultrasound, in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 101 patients with obstructive jaundice due to unresectable pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled between January 2010 and December 2017 in this retrospective study. Of these patients, 50 underwent implantation of iodine-125 seeds under EUS and/or percutaneous ultrasound guidance after receiving a stent via ERCP (treatment group), and 51 received a stent via ERCP without undergoing seed implantation (control group). The clinical data and therapeutic outcomes of these patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the treatment group obtained significant relief of abdominal pain at the 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month followup (p < 0.05), with a significantly lower visual analog scale pain score (p < 0.05). The treatment group obtained a longer median survival (8.8 vs. 6.5 months, p = 0.02), longer median duration of stent patency (10.8 ± 1.4 vs. 6.9 ± 0.8 months, p = 0.02), and prolonged average time to gastric outlet obstruction (6.8 ± 1.6 vs. 5.3 ± 1.3 months, p = 0.02). Differences between liver function and appetite for the two groups were not significant (p > 0.05 and p = 0.59, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Iodine-125 seed implantation after relief of obstructive jaundice via ERCP prolongs survival, biliary stent patency, and time to gastric outlet obstruction and improves patient quality of life by relieving pancreatic pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.

Biliary self-expandable metallic stent combined with Iodine-125 seeds strand in the treatment of hilar malignant biliary obstruction

Objective

To assess the safety and effectiveness of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) combined with Iodine-125 seeds strand to treat hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).

Methods

This retrospective study included patients who had received SEMS with ¹²⁵I seeds strand (seeds group) or SEMS alone (controls) to treat hilar MBO. Demographic, biochemical, stent patency, overall survival and complications data were extracted and analysed.

Results

A total of 76 patients were included (seeds group, n = 40; controls, n = 36), with a total of 608 seeds deployed in the seeds group (mean, 15.2 ± 4.1 [range, 8–25] seeds per patient). Statistically significant between-group differences were shown in median stent patency time (seeds group, 387.0 ± 27.9 days [95% confidence interval {CI} 332.4, 441.6] versus controls, 121.0 ± 9.1 days [95% CI 103.2, 138.8]) and in median overall survival (seeds group, 177.0 ± 17.9 days [95% CI 141.8, 212.2] versus controls, 123.0 ± 20.4 [95% CI 83.0, 163.0]). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in complication rates.

Conclusion

SEMS combined with ¹²⁵I seeds strand is safe, feasible, and tolerable in treating patients with hilar MBO, and may be effective in prolonging stent patency time and overall survival.

Study of Percutaneous Stent Placement with Iodine-125 Seed Strand for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of simultaneous placement of a self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) and iodine-125 seed strand in the management of malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 132 patients with MOJ treated from November 2015 to October 2017. Forty-five patients underwent insertion of SEMS with iodine-125 seed strands (Seeds group); the remaining 87 patients underwent SEMS placement alone (Control group). Technical success was defined as accurate, successful deployment of SEMS with or without iodine-125 seed strand; clinical success was defined as 20% reduction in serum bilirubin within 1 week after the procedure, compared with baseline. Complications, duration of primary stent patency, and overall survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all patients in both groups. In the Seeds group, an average of 14 seeds (range 8-22) were implanted in the bile duct as a strand. Clinical success rates were similar between the groups (Seeds group, 93.3%; Control group, 95.4%). Major complications occurred in only one patient, in the Control group. The median period of primary stent patency was significantly longer in the Seeds group (194 days) than in the Control group (86 days; P = 0.049). The median overall survival was also significantly longer in the Seeds group (194 days) than in the Control group (96 days; P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

SEMS combined with iodine-125 seed strands is effective and safe in the management of MOJ and can improve stent patency and patient survival.