Minor laparoscopic liver resection: toward 1-day surgery?

Enhanced recovery protocol in laparoscopic liver surgery

Introduction

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) accelerate recovery and shorten postoperative hospital stay. This increased knowledge of ERPs has also gradually implemented into liver surgery. However, in laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS), the experience of optimized perioperative care protocols is still limited.

Methods

We prospectively studied the implementation of multimodal ERP principles to LLS in the first 100 consecutive patients. Opioid-sparing multimodal pain management was applied together with early mobilization already in the postoperative care unit (PACU). Drains and catheters were avoided and per oral intake was initiated promptly. Primary pain control was achieved with iv NSAIDS, low-dose opioid and corticosteroids. Combination of per oral ibuprofen and long-acting tramadol was routinely administered shortly after operation. The multiprofessional adherence to the protocol was also evaluated.

Results

Investigated LLS was performed during Aug 2016–Apr 2019. Operations were done due to malignancy in 83 (83%) of cases, mostly for colorectal liver metastases (n = 52, 52%). Forty-eight (48%) of the operated patients were female. Median age was 65 years (range 17–91). The American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) classification median was three. Median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days (range 1–8 days). More than seventy percent of patients were discharged by the second postoperative day and nearly ninety percent by the third postoperative day. Complications after surgery were few. The new ERP elements were adopted in most of the cases.

Conclusions

ERP was introduced safely and effectively after LLS. The adherence to the ERP was good. Routine discharge 1–2 days after LLS is realistic and achievable.

Laparoscopic Liver Resection Ameliorates the Postoperative Liver Function Impairment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

To study whether laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is able to alleviate the postoperative liver function impairment for hepatocellular carcinoma patients, the clinical data of 103 patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 42 patients who underwent LLR and 61 patients who underwent open liver resection (OLR), during the period spanning from 2012 to 2017. The postoperative peak aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels in the LLR group were significantly lower than those of the OLR group (209.76±189.516 vs. 262.55±181.19, P=0.046; 250.56±200.944 vs. 411.01±412.51, P=0.005, for aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, respectively). The recovering of postoperative total protein and albumin in the LLR group was faster than that in the OLR group, and the total protein and albumin levels on the postoperative day-5 were significantly higher in the LLR group than in the OLR group (62.528±9.427 vs. 57.87±6.101, P=0.019; 36.456±4.875 vs. 33.653±4.112, P=0.012, respectively). In conclusion, these data show that LLR alleviates postoperative liver function impairment and increases liver function recovery.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation as day surgery - short-term clinical results of 235 consecutive cases

Many studies have reported the good outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, the majority of published studies on PELD showed an average hospital stay of 2 to 5 days. Thus, the purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PELD for LDH as day surgery with the outcomes of patients managed as inpatients.A total of 402 patients who underwent PELD for single-level LDH were included. The visual analog scale score (VAS) for leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and Macnab criteria were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively (final follow-up). Operation time, duration of hospital stay, cost, postoperative complications, and the rates of and reasons for delayed discharge and readmission were recorded and analyzed.The mean operative time was 45.8 ± 8.4 minutes in the PELD-A (nonday surgery mode) group and 41.3 ± 8.7 minutes in the PELD-D (day surgery mode) group (P = .63). The average duration of hospital stay was 2.8 ± 1.1 days in the PELD-A group and 3.2 ± 0.9 hours in the PELD-D group (P < .001). The average hospitalization expenses of the PELD-A and PELD-D groups were 28,090 ± 286 RMB and 24,356 ± 126 RMB (P = .03), respectively. In both groups, the mean VAS and ODI scores improved significantly postoperatively compared with the preoperative scores. The satisfactory result rate was 89.8% in the PELD-D group and 91.0% in the PELD-A group, without a significant difference (P = .68). The delayed discharge rate in the PELD-A and PELD-D groups was 8.20% and 8.43%, respectively (P = .93). The main reasons for delayed discharge were dysesthesia, neurologic deficit, nausea, headache and residential distance from the hospital. The overall readmission rates were 5.99% and 5.53% in the PELD-A and PELD-D groups, respectively (P = .85). The most common reasons for readmission were reherniation, sequestered herniation and pain.In conclusion, PELD is safe and effective for the treatment of LDH and can reduce medical costs as day surgery, and it thus warrants increased attention.

Minor laparoscopic liver resection as day-case surgery (without overnight hospitalisation): a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Day-case surgery (DCS) has become increasingly popular over recent years, as has laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for the treatment of benign or malignant liver tumours. The purpose of this prospective study was to demonstrate the feasibility of minor LLR as DCS.

METHODS

Prospective, intention-to-treat, non-randomised study of patients undergoing minor LLR between July 2015 and December 2017. Exclusion criteria were resection by laparotomy, major LLR, difficult locations for minor LLR, history of major abdominal surgery, hepatobiliary procedures without liver parenchyma resection, cirrhosis with Child > A and/or portal hypertension, significant medical history and exclusion criteria for DCS. The primary endpoint was the unplanned overnight admission rate. Secondary endpoints were the reason for exclusion, complication data, criteria for DCS evaluation, satisfaction and compliance with the protocol.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-seven patients underwent liver resection during the study period. LLR was performed in 92 patients (55%), as DCS in 23 patients (25%). Reasons for minor LLR were liver metastasis (n = 9), hepatic adenoma (n = 5), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 4), ciliated hepatic foregut cyst (n = 2) and other benign tumours (n = 3). All day-case minor LLR, except two patients, consisted of single wedge resection, while one patient underwent left lateral sectionectomy. There were four unplanned overnight admissions (17.4%), one unscheduled consultation (4.3%), two hospital readmissions (8.6%) and no major complications/mortality. Compliance with the protocol was 69.5%. Satisfaction rate was 91%.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients, day-case minor LLR is feasible with acceptable complication and readmission rates. Day-case minor LLR can therefore be legitimately proposed in selected patients.

A novel scoring system for conversion and complication in laparoscopic liver resection

Background

Although laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been increasingly popular worldwide, there is lack of predictive model to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LLR. The aim of this study was to establish a scoring system for predicting the possibility of conversion and complication, which could facilitate the patient selection for clinicians and communication with patients and their relatives during the informed consent process.

Methods

Consecutively 696 patients between August 1998 and December 2016 underwent LLR were recruited. The entire cohort was divided randomly into development and validation cohorts. The scoring system for conversion and complication were established according to risk factors identified from multiple logistic analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the clinical application. And the C-index and decision curve analysis (DCA) were conducted to evaluate the discrimination in comparison with other predictive models.

Results

Six hundred and ninety-six patients were enrolled eventually. The rate of conversion in the development and validation cohorts was 8.3% and 10.3%, respectively. Compared with 12.6% complication rate in the development cohort, 12.9% was concluded in the validation cohort. Upon on the identified risk factors, the risk stratification model was established and validated. Subsequent subgroup analysis indicated low risk patients presented superior surgical outcomes compared with high risk patients. Besides, the C-index and DCA implied our models had better capacities of predicting conversion and complication in comparison with previous scoring systems.

Conclusions

This novel scoring system presents the remarkable capacities of predicting conversion, complication in LLR. And thereby, it could be a useful instrument to facilitate the patient selection for clinicians and communication with patients and their relatives during the informed consent process.