1
|
Cao B, Lu J, Tan Y, Liu D. Efficacy and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for gastric submucosal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2020; 113:52-59. [PMID: 33222480 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6989/2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) can be an effective treatment for submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the esophagus and cardia. However, STER may be more difficult to perform in the stomach than in the esophagus due to special anatomical and physiological features. The feasibility of STER to remove gastric STMs has not been systematically investigated. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of STER for gastric SMTs. MATERIAL AND METHODS a comprehensive literature search of the Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. Complete resection and en-bloc resection rates were considered as the primary outcome measures. The secondary outcome measure was the pooled estimate of complications. RESULTS nine studies including 301 patients with 305 lesions were finally included. The pooled estimate of en-bloc resections was 95.1 % (95 % CI: 88.9-97.9 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.151, and the weighted pooled rate (WPR) for complete resection was 97.9 % (95 % CI: 93.6-99.3 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.778. In addition, the pooled estimate of gas-related complications was 8.7 % (95 % CI: 4.6-15.9 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.057. The pooled estimate for mucosal laceration was 4.2 % (95 % CI: 2.2-7.9 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.572. The pooled estimate for delayed bleeding was 2.1 % (95 % CI: 0.9-4.8 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.985. The pooled estimate of inflammation-related complications was 8.6 % (95 % CI: 5.2-13.9 %), Cochran's Q-test, p = 0.308. CONCLUSION STER is an effective and safe technique for removing gastric SMTs with low complications, and complications, when encountered, can be treated conservatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- BenDaXin Cao
- Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South Unive, China
| | - JiaXi Lu
- Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South Unive, China
| | - YuYong Tan
- Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South Unive, China
| | - DeLiang Liu
- Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South Unive, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Q, Cai JQ, Wang Z. Usefulness of tumor traction with a snare and endoclips in gastric submucosal tumor resection: a propensity-score-matching analysis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2020; 9:125-132. [PMID: 34026219 PMCID: PMC8128025 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goaa050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic resection, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR), was used to resect small gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). Our team explored a method of tumor traction using a snare combined with endoclips to assist in the resection of SMTs. This study aims to explore the safety and effectiveness of the method. Methods This research performed a propensity-score-matching (PSM) analysis to compare ESD/EFR assisted by a snare combined with endoclips (ESD/EFR with snare traction) with conventional ESD/EFR for the resection of gastric SMTs. Comparisons were made between the two groups, including operative time, en bloc resection rate, perioperative complications, and operation-related costs. Results A total of 253 patients with gastric SMTs resected between January 2012 and March 2019 were included in this study. PSM yielded 51 matched pairs. No significant differences were identified between the two groups in perioperative complications or the costs of disposable endoscopic surgical accessories. However, the ESD/EFR-with-snare-traction group had a shorter median operative time (39 vs 60 min, P = 0.005) and lower rate of en bloc resection (88.2% vs 100%, P = 0.027). Conclusions ESD/EFR with snare traction demonstrated a higher efficiency and en bloc resection rate for gastric SMTs, with no increases in perioperative complications and the costs of endoscopic surgical accessories. Therefore, the method seems an appropriate choice for the resection of gastric SMTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Jian-Qun Cai
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tan Y, Zhou B, Zhang S, Deng F, Li R, Gao S, Huo J, Liu D. Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Submucosal Tumors: a Comparison Between Cardia and Non-cardia Location. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:2129-2135. [PMID: 30859427 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04182-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) was initially used to remove submucosal tumors (SMTs) located at the esophagus and cardia; only few researchers have reported the feasibility of STER for gastric SMTs beyond cardia due to the technical difficulty, and little is known about the comparison of STER for cardia and non-cardia gastric SMTs. The purpose was to compare the feasibility and efficacy of STER for cardia and non-cardia gastric SMTs, as well as to explore the risk factors for failure of en bloc resection. METHODS We retrospectively collected the clinical data about patients with gastric SMTs who received STER at our hospital from June 2012 to June 2018. Demographics, tumor size, procedure-related parameters, complications, hospital stay, and follow-up data were compared between cardia and non-cardia SMTs. And multivariate analyses were conducted to look for the risk factors for failure of en bloc resection. RESULTS A total of 46 SMTs were removed, and 25 of them were located at cardia, while the other 21 at non-cardia position. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, tumor size, en bloc resection rate, operation time, complications, and hospital stay (p > 0.05). No recurrence was noticed in all the cases. Multivariate analyses revealed that irregular shape was an independent risk factor for failure of en bloc resection. CONCLUSION STER is feasible for both cardia and non-cardia gastric SMTs, and the efficacy between cardia and non-cardia location is comparable. Irregular shape was an independent risk factor for failure of en bloc resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuyong Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Bingyi Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Shilan Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Feihong Deng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Rong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Shan Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Jirong Huo
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Deliang Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang Q, Cai JQ, Wang Z, Xiao B, Bai Y. Snare combined with endoscopic clips in endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumor: a method of tumor traction. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E1150-E1162. [PMID: 31475234 PMCID: PMC6715454 DOI: 10.1055/a-0849-9625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Mucosal traction as a supportive technique is very useful for endoscopists during endoscopy. For gastric submucosal tumor (SMT), our team explored a method of pulling the SMT with a snare combined with endoclips (PSMT-SE). This study preliminarily explored its feasibility to assist resection of gastric SMT. Patients and methods Operation-related data from patients who underwent gastric SMT removal assisted by PSMT-SE at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center of Guangzhou Nanfang Hospital, China between January 2017 and October 2018 were retrospectively collected: tumor size and location, origin of tumor, total operation time, en bloc resection rate, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results Forty-two gastric SMTs in 41 patients were included in this study. Fifteen tumors were located in the gastric fundus, 11 in the gastric body, two in the gastric angle, 10 in the gastric antrum, and four in the greater curvature of the gastric fundus and the body junction. Further, 11 tumors originated from the submucosa and 31 originated from the muscularis propria. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full-thickness resection assisted by PSMT-SE were performed to resect 30 and 12 tumors, respectively. PSMT-SE could effectively expose the surgical field. Median diameter of resected tumors was 2.0 (0.7) cm, the total operation time was 45.5 (27.0) min, and the en bloc resection rate was 100 %. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Conclusion PSMT-SE is a potentially useful method for assisting resection of gastric SMT with tumor traction. Further prospective studies with large sample sizes are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jian-qun Cai
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Bing Xiao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yang Bai
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen H, Li B, Li L, Vachaparambil CT, Lamm V, Chu Y, Xu M, Cai Q. Current Status of Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114:718-725. [PMID: 31082838 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Most gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SETs) are identified incidentally during endoscopic examination and are located in the stomach. Some SETs are malignant or have the potential to become malignant. Tumors originating from deeper layers, such as the muscularis propria or serosa, are not easy to diagnose and resect. Current guidelines recommend yearly endoscopic surveillance of SETs smaller than 2 cm. This recommendation may not be cost-effective in managing GI SETs. Endoscopic resection results not only in obtaining sufficient tissue for pathological diagnosis but also in resection and curing the tumor. Many different endoscopic methods for resection of GI SETs have been published in the literature. To avoid confusion, we have divided these methods into standard endoscopic submucosal dissection, modified endoscopic submucosal dissection, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, and nonexposed and exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection. These procedures offer less invasive approaches than surgery for resection of GI SETs and may be the most cost-effective in taking care of patients with GI SETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huimin Chen
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Baiwen Li
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lianyong Li
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology, PLA 306th Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Cicily T Vachaparambil
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Vladimir Lamm
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yuan Chu
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Meidong Xu
- Endoscopic Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Cai
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|