Outcome of dilatation and predictors of failed dilatation in patients with acid-induced corrosive esophageal strictures

Outcomes of pneumatic dilation in pediatric caustic esophageal strictures: a descriptive and analytic study from a developing country

OBJECTIVES

Corrosive substance ingestion in children represents a significant public health issue due to its long-term health sequelae. Esophageal stricture, main complication of this dangerous condition, is treated by pneumatic dilation and eventually by esophageal replacement. We aimed, through this study, to report the outcomes of esophageal pneumatic dilation complicating corrosive substance ingestion in children in a developing country.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed on the population of pediatric patients with caustic esophageal stenosis between January 2005 and December 2020. All patients underwent pneumatic balloon dilation. A logistic regression model was built to predict the probability of the occurrence of the event (success/failure) of the dilation. The ROC curve is used to evaluate the performance of the logistic regression model to discriminate between positive and negative values of the dependent variable.

RESULTS

The success rate of pneumatic balloon dilation was 80.4%. The median duration of overall management was 11 months. The severity of caustic stricture observed during endoscopy was significantly linked to worse outcomes (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the severity of stenosis and the number of dilation sessions were independent risk factors for failure of dilation. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve was 71.7%. A Cut-Off point value of 7 provided the best sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSION

Pneumatic balloon dilation has been proven to be efficacious in infants with caustic esophageal stricture. Pediatric surgeons should take into account factors to promptly switch to replacement surgery and avoid unnecessary and time-consuming serial dilations.

Efficacy of a patient with scar constitution combined with corrosive esophageal strictures after different endoscopic therapies

Oral corrosive substances can cause esophageal or gastrointestinal strictures, leading to malnutrition and gastrointestinal dysfunction, directly affecting the patients' quality of life. The aim of the case was to compare the efficacy of different endoscopic therapy methods.

Endoscopic dilation with bougies versus balloons in caustic esophageal strictures: 17-year experience from a tertiary care center

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic dilation is the preferred management strategy for caustic esophageal strictures (CES). However, the differences in outcome for different dilators are not clear. We compared the outcome of CES using bougie and balloon dilators.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2016, the following data of all the patients with CES were collected: demographic parameters, substance ingestion, number of strictures, number of dilations required to achieve ≥ 14 mm dilation, post-dilation recurrence, and total dilations. Patients were divided into two groups for the type of dilator, i.e., bougie or balloon. The two groups were compared for baseline parameter, technical success, short- and long-term clinical success, refractory strictures, recurrence rates, and major complications.

RESULTS

Of the 189 patients (mean age 32.17 ± 12.12 years) studied, 119 (62.9%) were males. 122 (64.5%) patients underwent bougie dilation and 67 (35.5%) received balloon dilation. Technical success (90.1% vs. 68.7%, p < 0.001), short-term clinical success (65.6% vs. 46.3%, p value 0.01), and long-term clinical success (86.9% vs. 64.2%, p < 0.01) were higher for bougie dilators compared to balloon dilators. Twenty-four (12.7%) patients developed adverse events which were similar for two groups. On multivariate analysis, use of bougie dilators (aOR 4.868, 95% CI 1.027-23.079), short-term clinical success (aOR 5.785, 95% CI 1.203-27.825), and refractory strictures (aOR 0.151, 95% CI 0.033-0.690) were independent predictors of long-term clinical success.

CONCLUSION

Use of bougie dilators is associated with better clinical success in patients with CES compared to balloon dilators with similar rates of adverse events.

The utility of intraoperative endoscopy in esophagogastric surgery

Flexible endoscopy (FE) plays a major role in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Although its intraoperative use has spread over the years, its use by surgeons is still limited in our setting. FE training opportunities are different among many institutions, specialties, and countries. Intraoperative endoscopy (IOE) presents peculiarities that increase its complexity compared to standard FE. IOE has a positive impact on surgical results, due to increased safety and quality, as well as a reduction in the complications. Due to its innumerable advantages, its intraoperative use by surgeons is currently a current project in many countries and is part of the near future in others because of the creation of better structured training projects. This manuscript reviews and updates the indications and uses of intraoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in esophagogastric surgery.

Efficacy of bougie dilation for normal diet in benign esophageal stricture

OBJECTIVES

Bougination is one of the first-line treatments in benign esophageal stricture (BES). The aim of the study was to identify clinical and endoscopic factors affecting the achievement of a normal diet with only bougie dilation in patients with BES.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients treated with only bougination for BES at three hospitals were retrospectively investigated. Data including patient demographics, stricture and procedural characteristics were collected. Clinical success was defined as normal diet without additional procedures for two months after bougination. Clinical success rate and associated factors were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients with BES were included. The most common cause of BES was post-operative stricture (n = 55). Finally, 43 (36%) patients were able to eat a normal diet with only bougination. Of these patients, 42 (97.7%) achieved clinical success in the first three sessions or less. Among causes of stenosis, corrosive injury had the lowest success rate (9/40, 22.5%). Clinical success rate was significantly higher for those with the length of stricture of less than 2 cm (47.2%), those with pre-procedural dysphagia of semi-solid or soft diet (51.3%) and those with dilation of 13 mm or more (46.1%). However, the duration of symptom, the number of previous endoscopic treatments and the location of stenosis were not related to clinical success.

CONCLUSIONS

Normal diet is possible in one-third of BES after bougination alone. Predictable factors for achieving a normal diet were less than four sessions of dilation, short length of stricture, pre-procedural dysphagia status and diameter of dilator.

Perforations from Endoscopic Dilation of Corrosive Strictures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic dilation is an important therapeutic option for treatment of corrosive strictures. Its safety is unclear with variable perforation rates in previous studies. We aimed to evaluate its safety with regard to perforations and the effect of dilator type to perforation risk.

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature from inception to April 24, 2021, using PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted. Studies in adult subjects (mean age ≥ 18 years) reporting perforation rates of endoscopic dilation of corrosive esophageal and/or gastric strictures were included. Pooled cumulative perforation rates were computed as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included, perforation with each dilator subtypes, surgical or conservative modes of management and mortality. Random effect meta-analysis was used to estimate the frequency of each of these outcomes. Variables were reported as percentages with 95% CI.

RESULTS

A total of 712 subjects (N) who underwent 4840 dilations (n) were noted in the 15 studies that were included. Of which, eight were retrospective, while the remaining seven were prospective. On meta-analysis, the cumulative pooled perforation rate was 1% (1-2%) of the number of dilations (n%). The perforation rates with SG (1%, 0-3%) and balloon (1%, 0-5%) dilators were similar (p value < 0.01). 45/64 (59%, 11-94%) perforations were subjected to surgery while the remaining 14/64 (41%, 6-89%) was managed conservatively. Choice of management strategy was biased to the norms of the treating team. About 3/712 patients (0%, 0-2%) succumbed following perforation.

CONCLUSION

Perforation from endoscopic dilation of corrosive strictures occurs rarely, and there is no significant difference in perforation risk related to the type of dilator.

Outcomes of the management of corrosive injuries of the upper digestive tract in a tertiary care center

Esophageal stricture is the most common delayed sequelae of aerodigestive tract corrosive injuries. Early endoscopic dilatation is an integral part of corrosive injury management. Self-dilatation of the esophagus is effective in preventing stricture recurrence. In this prospective study, we included patients with corrosive aerodigestive tract injury from January 2009 to December 2020. We analyzed the outcome of the endoscopic dilatation and self-dilatation treatments administered to patients with a corrosive esophageal stricture. Among 295 patients, 164 had an esophageal injury, 73 had esophago-gastric injury, 55 had a gastric injury, and 3 had the pharyngeal injury. Of the 295 patients, 194 (81.85%) underwent dilatation, and 13 patients with diffuse esophageal injury underwent upfront surgery. Successful dilatation was performed in 169 (87.11%) patients. Of the 68 patients undergoing self-dilatation, 63 patients achieved nutritional autonomy by 28 days. Early endoscopic dilatation effectively prevents surgery, and self-dilatation appears promising to prevent recurrent esophageal stricture.

Predictors of successful endoscopic management of caustic esophageal strictures in children: When to stop the dilatations?

BACKGROUND

Caustic esophageal strictures are mainly managed by endoscopic dilatations. Cases that do not respond to the dilatations eventually require an esophageal replacement. The aim of our study was to identify factors that could allow us to predict if the dilatations will be successful or not.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the chart of 100 patients with caustic esophageal injuries treated at our center between 2012 and 2019. Collected data included age, gender, type of caustic substance, duration of the dilatations, length and extent of the strictures, number and time interval between dilatations, presence of gastroesophageal reflux, occurrence of esophageal perforation, and outcome of the dilatation program.

RESULTS

The patient ages ranged from 1 to 8 years old. The overall success rate was 98.2% for patients with short strictures and 81.8% for patients with long strictures (>3 cm). A long stricture, a pharyngeal extension of the stricture, the occurrence of an esophageal perforation, and the presence of gastroesophageal reflux were strong predictors of the failure of the dilatation program. The median treatment time for the patients to achieve a cure was 5 months in cases of short strictures and 17 months in cases of long strictures. Within the subgroup of patients with long strictures, a dysphagia-free period within the first year of management of 8 weeks was associated with the success of the dilatation program.

CONCLUSION

A length of more than 3 cm, pharyngeal involvement, the occurrence of esophageal perforation, and the presence of gastroesophageal reflux are predictors of failure of dilatations for the management of caustic esophageal strictures. A dysphagia-free period of 8 weeks or more within the first year of dilatations is considered a predictor of success of dilatations in patients with long strictures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

[Noninvasive magnetic stimulation with endoscopic navigation for the treatment of cricopharyngeal failure in chronic critical illness]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of treatment of cricopharyngeal insufficiency in chronic critical illness caused by severe brain injury using non-invasive magnetic stimulation with endoscopic navigation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty patients (19 men and 11 women, mean age 50±12 years) were studied. The exposure was carried out by a bipolar alternating magnetic field using an inductor located in the projection of the hyoid bone. The study compared the standard therapy and the complex of therapeutic measures, in which the proposed non-invasive magnetic stimulation method with endoscopic navigation was included. The procedure was carried out daily without regime changes, with objective control 1 time in 10 days. The duration of the first course was 10 days, followed by a decision to extend the course for another 10 days, depending on the objective dynamics. Evaluation was performed with the Rosenbek Penetration and Aspiration Scale (PAS), the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS), The Mann assessment of swallowing ability (MASA) and the Functional oral intake scale (FOIS).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Improvements of swallowing function were observed in both groups, but qualitative changes were more pronounced in the main group. The use of the proposed method made it possible to obtain a more stable and predictable result.

Accuracy of contrast swallow study in assessment of caustic esophageal stricture length in children: Agreement study

BACKGROUND

Caustic esophageal stricture length assessment is essential for planning endoscopic management and predicting its prognosis. We aimed to assess the accuracy of contrast swallow study (CSS) in measuring stricture length in comparison to endoscopy (definitive investigation for actual length measurement).

METHOD

Medical records of caustic esophageal strictures between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Reliability study was done to compare between radiological and endoscopic measurement of stricture length.

RESULT

124 CSSs for 91 patients were analyzed. Six studies showed no stricture, single stricture was reported in 101 studies, double strictures were reported in 16 studies, triple strictures were reported in one study (136 radiological stricture). Endoscopy revealed 133 true strictures. Number of the strictures was consistent between CSS and endoscopy in 112 studies (90.3%) and different in 12 studies (9.7%). Eight endoscopies revealed strictures not reported in CSS (5.5% false negative strictures), while 10 CSSs reported 11 strictures that were not detected during the endoscopy (7.6% false positive strictures). Reliability analysis revealed interclass correlation coefficient = 0.6 (95% CI 0.5 to 0.7) indicating moderate reliability.

CONCLUSION

CSS is not accurate in assessing caustic esophageal stricture length. Combination of CSS and endoscopic investigation is better for proper evaluation of these patients. Level III of evidence.

A prospective randomized controlled trial of omeprazole for preventing esophageal stricture in grade 2b and 3a corrosive esophageal injuries

OBJECTIVES

Esophageal stricture is a significant complication of grade 2b and 3a esophageal injuries and causes much patient suffering. Preventing strictures would be beneficial to patients but there are currently no proven effective drugs. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of omeprazole for preventing esophageal stricture in adults with grade 2b and 3a corrosive esophageal injuries.

METHODS

This study was an open single-center prospective randomized controlled trial that took place from April 2018 to January 2020. Patients were randomized to standard treatment or 80 mg/day intravenously × 3 days followed by 40 mg/day orally for 4 weeks. They were endoscoped at baseline and 4 weeks post discharge. Strictures were confirmed radiologically.

RESULTS

20 patients were enrolled: 15 with grade 2b and five with grade 3a injuries. Standard care and omeprazole groups numbered 10 each. At 1 month, seven and two patients developed strictures in the standard and omeprazole groups, respectively, p = 0.024, for a risk reduction of 71.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole reduced the risk of short-term developing esophageal strictures following grade 2b and 3a corrosive esophageal injuries. Larger studies are needed to reconfirm this finding. Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) number TCTR20190504001.

Risk factors and clinical outcomes of endoscopic dilation in benign esophageal strictures: a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic dilation (ED) is still the mainstay of therapeutic management of benign esophageal strictures (BESs). This study aimed to establish risk factors for refractory BESs and assess long-term clinical outcomes of ED.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study in 891 patients who underwent ED from 2003 to 2018 for BESs. We searched electronic medical records in 6 tertiary care centers in the Netherlands for data on clinical outcome of ED. Median follow-up was 39 months. The primary endpoint was risk factors for refractory BESs, defined as factors associated with an increased number of ED sessions during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were time from first to last ED session and adverse events.

RESULTS

Dilation up to 13 to 15 mm was associated with a higher number of ED sessions than dilation up to 16 to 18 mm (5.0 vs 4.1; hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; P = .001). Compared with peptic strictures, anastomotic (4.9 vs 3.6; HR, 2.1; P < .001), radiation (5.0 vs 3.6; HR, 3.0; P < .001), caustic (7.2 vs 3.6; HR, 2.7; P < .001), and postendotherapy (3.9 vs 3.6; HR, 1.8; P = .005) strictures were associated with a higher number of ED sessions. After 1 year of follow-up, the proportions of patients who remained free of ED was 75% in anastomotic, 71% in radiation, 70% in peptic, 83% in postendotherapy, and 62% in caustic strictures. Esophageal perforation occurred in 23 ED sessions (.4%) in 22 patients (2.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 60% of patients with BESs remain free of ED after 1 year of follow-up. Because dilation up to 16 to 18 mm diameter was associated with fewer ED sessions during follow-up, we suggest that clinicians should consider dilation up to at least 16 mm to reduce the number of ED sessions in these patients.

Esophageal Stricture Caused by the Ingestion of Undissolved Picosulfate Powder

Picosulfate solution is widely used as a small volume bowel cleansing agent and is considered to be effective and relatively safe. A case of a 75-year-old woman ingested picosulfate powder and drank a small volume of water, subsequently experienced severe burning pain in the chest. Endoscopy was performed and showed a submucosal hemorrhage and exudative ulcers at the mid to lower esophagus. At 2 weeks, her symptoms improved with conservative treatment. However, liquid food dysphagia developed 11 weeks after ingestion. A follow-up endoscopy revealed multiple esophageal strictures, which were treated with a fully covered metal stent and esophageal balloon dilation. Consequently, the esophageal strictures improved after one year. As this case demonstrates, detailed information about picosulfate powder ingestion after dissolving it in more than 200 mL of water should be presented to patients to avoid esophageal injury.

Corrosive Esophageal Strictures: From Dilatation to Replacement: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Endoscopic dilatation is the recommended primary therapy for chronic corrosive esophageal strictures (ES), and surgery is reserved for failed dilatation. Through this study, we intend to analyze the efficacy and long-term outcomes of both endoscopic and surgical interventions in corrosive ES. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with chronic corrosive ES, managed with endoscopic or surgical procedures at a tertiary teaching institute in North India from December 2009 to December 2016, was performed from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome measure was the absence of dysphagia following dilatation or surgery. During the study period, 64 patients with ES underwent surgical or endoscopic treatment. Associated gastric strictures and pharyngeal strictures were present in 39 (60%) and 22 patients (28.9%), respectively. The mean age was 28.8 years and mean BMI was 14.2 kg/m². Acid was the most common corrosive substance. Endoscopic dilatation using Savary-Gilliard (SG) dilators was successful in achieving persistent symptom relief in 46 patients (71.8%) after a total of 358 sessions (mean number of dilatations were 5.2 ± 1.2) of dilatations over 2 years. The dilatation therapy failed in 18 patients (28.1%) including technical failures (15.6%), perforations (3.1%), refractory stricture (1.5%) and recurrent strictures (7.8%). Increasing stricture length (more than 6 cm) was associated with poor outcome of endoscopic dilatation (p < 0.001). Only eleven patients (17%) required esophageal replacement (resection: 0, bypass: 11) for failed dilatations including seven gastric pull-ups and four pharyngo-coloplasty. The stricture rate after surgery was 36.3% (4/11). The median follows up was 32 months. Endoscopic dilatation of corrosive ES is safe and effective therapy and should be the first-line therapy for these patients and surgery should be considered only in patients who have unsuccessful outcome following dilatation therapy.

Tight near-total corrosive strictures of the proximal esophagus with concomitant involvement of the hypopharynx: Flexible endoscopic management using a novel technique

AIM

To investigate the role of a novel minimally invasive endoscopic technique in the management of tight near-total corrosive strictures of the proximal esophagus involving the hypopharynx.

METHODS

Two patients with near-total corrosive strictures of the proximal esophagus involving the hypopharynx were managed with the novel endoscopic technique. The technique involved passing a 0.025-inch flexible guide-wire across the stricture, and stricture dilatation, using 10F coaxial diathermy and balloon dilators, followed by electro-incision of the proximal aspect of the residual eccentric stricture by means of a novel approach using a wire-guided sphincterotome.

RESULTS

Both patients were successfully managed on an outpatient department basis with the complete relief of symptoms and resolution of strictures on endoscopy and an esophagogram. No adverse events were seen during or after the procedure. There was no recurrence of symptoms at a follow-up of over a year in both cases. There was a significant improvement in the body mass index of both patients after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

We report a novel flexible endoscopic technique for the management of complex hypopharyngo-esophageal strictures. In experienced hands, the procedure is relatively simple, safe and effective with a durable response.

Role of endoscopy in caustic injury of the esophagus

Caustic injury of the esophagus is a problematic condition challenging endoscopists worldwide. Although the caustic agents and motives are different among countries and age groups, endoscopy still plays an invaluable role in diagnosis and treatment. Endoscopy can determine the severity of caustic ingestion which is of great importance in choosing appropriate treatment. However, some aspects of endoscopy in diagnosis of caustic injury remain controversial. Whether or not all patients need endoscopy, when to perform endoscopy and how to assess the severity are just some examples of these controversies. Due to lack of randomized controlled trials, many findings and suggestions are inconclusive. Computerized tomography scan of the chest and abdomen gains popularity in assessing the severity of caustic injury and avoiding unnecessary surgery. If esophageal stricture eventually develops, endoscopic dilatation is a mainstay. Maneuvers such as steroid injection and esophageal stent may be used in a refractory stricture. Nevertheless, some patients have to undergo surgery in spite of vigorous attempts with esophageal dilatation. To date, caustic injury remains a difficult situation. This article reviews all aspects of caustic injury of the esophagus focusing on endoscopic role. Pre-endoscopic management, endoscopy and its technique in acute and late phase of caustic injury including the endoscopic management of refractory stricture, and the treatment outcomes following each endoscopic intervention are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the role of endoscopy in the long term follow-up of patients with esophageal caustic injury is addressed.