The advantages of transumbilical single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia in 1583 children

Outcomes from a new modified single needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure and cut off for pediatric inguinal hernia

Inguinal hernia is a prevalent surgical condition in pediatric patients. Despite the efficacy of current treatment modalities, a certain recurrence rate still persists. Hence, our objective in this study is to introduce an innovative surgical technique designed to minimize surgical complications. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 809 pediatric cases that underwent laparoscopic repair with our innovative technique for inguinal hernia from June 2020 to June 2022. Demographic information, perioperative details, and postoperative follow-up outcomes were thoroughly assessed. All surgeries were conducted laparoscopically under general anesthesia. The procedure commenced by encircling the hernia sac with two sutures under laparoscopic guidance. Subsequently, the sac was exteriorized from the body using the two sutures, followed by ligation and excision of the hernia sac. The research findings demonstrate that the duration of unilateral and bilateral procedures was recorded as 15.9 ± 4.8 and 21.7 ± 3.9 min, respectively. Incision infection occurred in 7 patients (0.87%), and Male Complicated Inguinal Hernia (MCIH) was observed in 2 patients (0.23%). Notably, there were no occurrences of iatrogenic cryptorchidism, testicular atrophy, or recurrence (0%) during the follow-up period. In conclusion, our novel modification shows a notable reduction in postoperative recurrence rates and alleviates the impact of the procedure on the positioning of the testis or uterus. This modified technique is both safe and valuable, thus warranting broader adoption and promotion.

Single-Port Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Repair of Pediatric Inguinal Hernias and Hydroceles by Using Hernia Crochet Needle With a Cannula

PURPOSE

Numerous modifications laparoscopic techniques have mushroomed in recent years. Here we describe a modified technique of extracorporeal ligation of processus vaginalis in children using a hernia crochet needle with a cannula.

METHODS

Processus vaginalis repair was carried out on patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia or hydroceles using this novel technique between June 2021 and June 2022. The processus vaginalis was closed extracorporeally using a hernia crochet needle with a cannula. In the presence of patent processus vaginalis, the same procedure would be performed on the contralateral side. The primary outcomes was the safety and efficiency of this modified procedure, and the secondary outcomes was the post operative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 212 (165 inguinal hernia and 47 hydroceles) children were corrected by this novel technique. The mean operation time was 27.49 min for unilateral inguinal hernia cases and 36.55 min for bilateral cases. The unilateral hydrocele median operation time was 27.83 min and that for the bilateral cases was 37.30 min. During the mean of 10.92 months of follow-up, there was only a boy subject to a metachronous contralateral occurrence of hernia 10 months after surgery, and no other complications (knot reactions, testicular atrophy, postoperative hydrocele or iatrogenic) have been observed yet.

CONCLUSION

This study shown a unique procedure with using a hernia crochet needle with a cannula to be simple, safe, and effective in managing inguinal hernias and hydroceles in the pediatric population.

Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair Versus Open Repair in Boys with Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric inguinal hernia is a common surgical problem in boys. Open hernia repair surgery (OH) has been traditionally used to treat this condition, but it leads to complications, such as testicular complications. Laparoscopic hernia repair by using the extraperitoneal method (LHE) is performed through the percutaneous insertion of sutures and extracorporeal closure of patent vaginalis processus; thus, injury to spermatic cord structures is avoided. However, a meta-analysis comparing LHE and OH is lacking.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis of the retrieved studies was performed, and a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect size. The primary outcome was testicular complications, including ascending testis, hydrocele, and testicular atrophy. The secondary outcomes were surgical metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH), ipsilateral hernia recurrence, and operation time.

RESULTS

In total, 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 non-RCTs involving 17,555 boys were included. The incidence of ascending testis (risk ratio [RR]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.78; p = 0.008) and MCIH (RR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07-0.43; p = 0.0002) was significantly lower in LHE than in OH. The incidence of hydrocele, testicular atrophy, and ipsilateral hernia recurrence did not differ between LHE and OH.

CONCLUSION

Compared with OH, LHE led to fewer or equivalent testicular complications without increasing ipsilateral hernia recurrence. Moreover, MCIH incidence was lower in LHE than in OH. Hence, LHE could be a feasible choice with less invasiveness for inguinal hernia repair in boys.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study, LEVEL III.

Needle consideration in umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for patent processus vaginalis of children: hook-needle or forcep-needle

BACKGROUND

Although umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for the treatment of processus vaginalis patency of children has been verified to be safe and effective, the improvements of technical skills and instruments have been always on their ways. Recently, forcep-needle has begun to be used. In this study, we compared forcep-needle with hook-needle in this minimal invasive procedure for children suffered from hernia or hydrocele, with the aim to evaluate the instrumental convenience of the two needles.

METHODS

From July 2021 to May 2022, we begun to use hook-needle or forcep-needle in umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for children suffered from hernia or hydrocele. The hook-needle group included nineteen children and the forcep-needle group included twenty-four ones. The data of the patients age, sex, side, operation time, postoperative hospital-stay, follow-up time, postoperative complications were evaluated. Common silk thread was used to encircle the internal ring preperitoneally.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between the two groups for the following items: age, sex, side, operation time, postoperative hospital-stay and postoperative complications (P > 0.05). The follow-up time of the hook-needle group was longer than that of the forcep-one (P = 0.0020). No open transfer happened for all the patients. One hydrocele boy in the hook-needle group reoccurred 1 month postoperatively due to the peritoneal broken. The single pole retreating of the hook-needle accompanied with chaotic movements, while for that of the forcep-needle, the double-arm retreating movements were more orderly. The outer surface of the forcep-needle was smooth without restrain, as for the hook-needle, an inlaid barb held the danger of brokening the peritoneum.

CONCLUSION

In our preliminary experience of umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure using a hook-needle or a forcep-needle, in view of the instrumental convenience and safety, the double-arm and smooth outer surface designs of the forcep-needle contained more spatial orientation perceptions and safety.

Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal internal ring closure for paediatric inguinal hernia using a needle grasper

BACKGROUND

Single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure has been widely used for the repair of paediatric inguinal hernia. In this study, we aimed to introduce the usage of a needle grasper in single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in children.

METHODS

In our study, 447 children with inguinal hernia underwent single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure between October 2018 and October 2021 in Shenzhen Children' hospital were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 447 patients, there were 396 males and 51 females with a mean age of 2.24 ± 0.36 years. A contralateral patent processus vaginalis was present in 165 unilateral hernia patients. All patients underwent laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure successfully without converting to open operation. The mean operating time in unilateral and bilateral hernia patients were 10.23 ± 2.25 mine and 14.54 ± 2.81 mine respectively. One patient had subcutaneous emphysema, two male patients had inguinal hernia recurrence and none had complications such as hydrocele and testicular atrophy. Additional 0.3 cm port was done in 4 cases. The mean follow-up time was 22.36 ± 4.56 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of paediatric inguinal hernia using a needle grasper is a feasible and safe procedure. It has the advantages of fewer skin surgical incisions, short operating time, low complication and low recurrence rate.

Comparison of learning curves for laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy performed by 2 surgeons

We aimed to compare the learning curves of 2 surgeons with different endoscopic bases when performing laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy (LESS-M). We retrospectively analyzed and compared 2 groups of patients who underwent LESS-M performed by 2 surgeons with different bases in multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS) from October 2019 to December 2020 at West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University. Patients' characteristics and related surgical indicators were compared, and surgeons' learning curves were analyzed using a cumulative sum analysis. All of the patients completed LESS-M without converting to MLS or laparotomy, despite Surgeon A being MLS-unqualified and Surgeon B being MLS-qualified. There were no significant differences in patients' characteristics or surgical indicators between the 2 groups (P > 0.05 for all). Surgeons A and B crossed the learning curve after 21 and 18 cases, respectively. LESS-M is safe and feasible. Approximately 20 cases are required for surgeons to achieve LESS-M proficiency, and surgeons without MLS experience can still master LESS-M.

Anatomical laparoscopic orchiopexy and hybrid transcrotal orchiopexy for high inguinal undescended testis: A novel and interfascial technique

BACKGROUND

In traditional laparoscopic orchiopexy for inguinal undescended testis (UDT) surgery, the testicles are pulled back into the abdominal cavity by grasping and cephalad retracting the testicle and the cord. If this fails, a subsequent open inguinal incision is made to complete orchiopexy. To improve the orchiolysis and avoid extra open inguinal incision, we describe our early experience with and illustrate the surgical procedure of a novel anatomical laparoscopic orchiopexy (ALO) and hybrid transscrotal orchiopexy as required in high palpable UDT.

METHODS

From March 2018 to April 2020, ALO was performed in 140 consecutive patients (158 testes) with high inguinal UDT. After blunt and bloodless dissection of the inter-tunica vaginalis-cremasteric fascia plane, tunica vaginalis enveloping the testis was brought into the abdominal cavity as a whole. When the tunica vaginalis was unable to be brought into the abdominal cavity, given that the orchiolysis had already been partially carried out, the testis could be brought out of the external ring and descended when converting to transscrotal surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age in this study was 1.88 years (SD±1.95). The position of the testis assessed at surgery was peeping (58, 36.7%) and canalicular (100, 63.3%). In 128 testes (81.1%), ALO successfully brought the UDT into the abdominal cavity; the remaining 30 testes (18.9%) required a hybrid transscrotal technique. All testes were successfully descended without conversion to open inguinal procedure. The mean operative time was 43.99.2 minutes. All patients had follow-up within a median of 17.8 months, with satisfactory results in relation to viability and location of the testis.

CONCLUSIONS

ALO was shown to be not only safe, feasible, and effective for high inguinal UDT but also facilitated subsequent hybrid transscrotal orchiopexy; when the testis failed to be pulled into the abdominal cavity, the conversion to open inguinal orchiopexy could be obviated.

Comparison of the Detection and Ligation of Patent Processus Vaginalis Between Laparoscopy-Assisted Transscrotal Orchiopexy and Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy

This study aimed to compare the detection and ligation of patent processus vaginalis (PPV) between laparoscopy-assisted transscrotal orchidopexy (LATO) and single scrotal incision orchiopexy (SSIO) for low palpable undescended testis (UDT). We performed a retrospective medical record review of transscrotal orchidopexies performed for low palpable UDT at our institution from 2017 to 2019; 33 and 39 boys underwent LATO and SSIO, respectively. Data collection included patient demographics, incidence of PPV, operative time, and clinical outcomes. All 95 testes were delivered into the scrotum. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to patients' age, side, and mean operative time. The incidence of PPV in the LATO group was significantly higher than that in the SSIO group (56.52 vs. 34.69%, P = 0.04). The incidence of contralateral PPV in the LATO group was 45%. One patient in the SSIO group underwent unilateral PV ligation and laparoscopic exploration revealed bilateral PPV owing to metachronous contralateral hydrocele. One patient in the LATO group demonstrated obliterated PV in the initial transscrotal procedure, but an ipsilateral PPV was found in the latter laparoscopic procedure. In conclusion, LATO has a higher detection rate and higher ligation of the PPV than SSIO, suggesting that, LATO may help reduce recurrent PPV-related issues. However, long-term follow-up results are needed to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages in a larger case series.

Modified Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure Using a Sledge-Shaped Needle for Inguinal Hernia and Hydrocele in 1199 Pediatric Patients

Background: The objective of the study is to determine the safety and efficiency of the modified laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) to treat pediatric patients with inguinal hernia or hydrocele. Methods: From January 2014 to July 2018, the patients with inguinal hernia or hydrocele who were operated on using modified LPEC were included. We modified LPEC with a sledge-shaped needle and reinforcement flag. By means of medial umbilical fold, the reinforcement surgery should be performed on the patients with huge internal rings (diameter >1.5 cm). Operative time, complication rate, incidence of reinforcement, and contralateral patent processus vaginalis were described between inguinal hernia and hydrocele. Results: In this study, 764 patients with inguinal hernia and 435 patients with hydrocele were successfully performed by the modified LPEC. The 383 (50.1%) patients with inguinal hernia and 266 (61.1%) patients with hydrocele were identified with a contralateral patency of internal ring and underwent simultaneous prophylactic surgery. During surgical procedures, the medial umbilical fold reinforcement (inguinal hernia/hydrocele = 50/1) was performed on 51 patients. Hernia recurrence occurred in 2 cases. All patients had a good cosmetic appearance without additional dissection. Conclusion: Modified LPEC using a sledge-shaped needle and applying the medial umbilical fold reinforcement is a safe and effective surgical procedure.

Comparison of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure and laparoscopic intracorporeal suture in pediatric hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic inguinal repair use is rapidly growing because it is a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technique. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of one MIS over others. We compared laparoscopic intracorporeal suture (LIS) and laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) to determine which technique is superior.

METHODS

Between February 2017 and December 2019, 260 children who underwent LPEC and 214 children who underwent LIS were enrolled. Operative time, recovery score, and patient cosmetic satisfaction were compared. A total of 108 propensity score-matched pairs were analyzed using paired t-test for continuous measurements and McNemar test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

The mean surgery time was lower in the LPEC group for both unilateral (15.76 ± 5.35 vs. 19 ± 5.71 min; p = 0.04) and bilateral (21.56 ± 5.7 vs. 26.38 ± 6.94 min; p = 0.01) surgeries. The LPEC group required shorter time for complete recovery (p = 0.017). The mean rating for scar visibility was higher in the LIS group (p = 0.02); however, both groups had high levels of cosmetic satisfaction (p = 0.125).

CONCLUSION

LPEC for hernia repair is safe and efficient in children and reduced operative time, hastened recovery, and provided excellent cosmetic results.