Laparoscopic liver hanging maneuver through the retrohepatic tunnel on the right side of the inferior vena cava combined with a simple vascular occlusion technique for laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy

Up-to-down open and laparoscopic liver hanging maneuver: an overview

BACKGROUND

The liver hanging maneuver (LHM) was described by Belghiti et al. to facilitate liver resection and is done classically by creating a space between the caudate lobe and the inferior vena cava starting on the edge of caudate lobe and extending cranially, in a para-caval fashion, towards the space between the right and middle hepatic veins. LHM facilitates liver transection, guides anatomical resections, decreases blood loss, facilitates harvesting of the liver graft in live donors, and also has oncological advantages.

STUDY DESIGN

We describe a new approach named "up-to-down" to perform LHM in open and laparoscopic liver resections. This approach was mainly used in obese patients, in laparoscopic liver resections and in cases of failure of the classic approach. The advantages/disadvantages, complications, and different modalities of LHM are also summarized.

RESULTS

The peritoneal layer between the liver capsule and the infrahepatic vena cava is opened, and a short blind dissection is initiated on the right anterolateral aspect of the inferior vena cava to the left of the hepatic vein of segment VI. The suprahepatic vena cava is exposed, and the space between the right and middle hepatic veins and the vena cava is created by gentle dissection. A 16-Fr nasogastric tube is positioned in the space between the right and middle hepatic vein, pointing inferiorly, and pushed downwards, in a para-caval manner caudally until it is seen inferiorly. The results of this approach are given.

CONCLUSION

LHM facilitates liver resection, and many variations have been described worldwide in open and laparoscopic liver surgery. The up-to-down approach should be part of the surgical armamentarium in order to offer a safer way to achieve LHM in some patients.

Hydrodissection of the Retrohepatic Space: A Technique to Physically Separate a Liver Tumour from the Inferior Vena Cava and the Ostia of the Hepatic Veins

OBJECTIVE

To report a technique of percutaneous retrohepatic hydrodissection, highlighting its potential to physically separate liver tumours from the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the ostia of the hepatic veins (HV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2017 and April 2018, hydrodissection of the retrohepatic IVC was performed in 5 patients (5 females; mean age 64.5 years) undergoing percutaneous ablation of 5 liver metastases (mean size: 3.6 cm) located adjacent to the IVC. Number of hydrodissection needles, volume of hydrodissection, separation of tumour/liver parenchyma from IVC/HV post-hydrodissection; technical success of ablation; and complications were tabulated.

RESULTS

Two to three 22G spinal needles were required per case for adequate dissection. Mean volume to obtain sufficient hydrodissection was 410 ml on average. Physical separation of the IVC and tumour/hepatic parenchyma was successful in all cases, by 9 mm on average (range 5-12 mm). It also leaded to physical separation of the ostia of the right and middle HV in all cases. There was no early or delayed complication, notably no venous thrombosis in the post-operative period. All lesions but one were completely ablated after one session at 3-month follow-up. The patient with residual tumour was successfully retreated.

CONCLUSION

Retrohepatic hydrodissection is a feasible technique to separate a tumour from the IVC and/or ostia of the HV. This could potentially limit the heat-sink effect/reduce the risk of thrombosis. Larger follow-up studies are required to assess efficacy on a long-term basis.